Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

From Jesus to Christ
GA 131

12 October 1911, Karlsruhe

Lecture VIII

Yesterday we indicated that it was now necessary to answer the question: What really happened to that Being whom we designate as Christ Jesus from the Baptism by John in Jordan to the Mystery of Golgotha? To answer this question as far as possible, we must recall briefly what we know from former lectures concerning the life of Jesus of Nazareth, who in his thirtieth year became the bearer of the Christ. The essential points are given in my recently published book, The Spiritual Guidance of Mankind.

We know that in Palestine, at the time which concerns us, not one but two Jesus-children were born, one of them from the Solomon line of the House of David. This is the Jesus child of whom the Matthew Gospel speaks. The peculiar contradiction between the beginnings of the Matthew and the Luke Gospels derives from the fact that the writer of the Matthew Gospel was concerned with one of the Jesus-children, the one born from the Solomon line. Then, at almost but not quite the same time, another Jesus-child was born, from the Nathan line of the House of David.

The important thing is to understand clearly what kind of beings these two children were. Occult investigation shows that the individuality who was in the Solomon Jesus-child was none other than Zarathustra. After Zarathustra's most important mission, of which we have spoken in connection with the ancient Persian civilisation, he had been incarnated again and again; lastly during the Babylonian-Chaldaic civilisation, and now as the Solomon Jesus-child. This Zarathustra individuality, with all the great and powerful inner forces which in the nature of things he had brought over from earlier incarnations, had to incarnate in a body descended from the Solomon side of the House of David; a body adapted for working up and further developing the great faculties of Zarathustra, in the way that human faculties, when they are already at a very high level, can be brought further on, in so far as they belong to the being who is going from incarnation to incarnation. We are concerned therefore with a human body which did not wait until later years to work on these faculties, but could do so in a youthful, child-like and yet powerful organism. Hence we see the Zarathustra-individuality growing up in such a way that the faculties of the child developed comparatively early. The child soon showed an extent of knowledge which would normally have been impossible at his age.

One fact, however, we must keep firmly in mind: the Solomon Jesus-child, although the incarnation of so lofty an individuality, was only a highly developed man. Hence he was encumbered—as even the most highly developed man must be—with certain liabilities to error and moral difficulties, though not exactly vices or sins. Then we know that in his twelfth year the individuality of Zarathustra, by an occult process known to everyone who has made himself conversant with such facts, forsook the body of the Solomon Jesus-child and went over into the body of the Nathan Jesus-child. Now the body of this Nathan Jesus-child—or, better, his three-fold bodily organisation physical body, etheric body, astral body—was formed in a quite special manner. In fact, this body was such that the child showed capacities exactly contrary to those of the Solomon Jesus-child. Whereas the latter was remarkable because of his great gifts in relation to things one can learn externally, it might almost be said that in this respect the Nathan Jesus-child was untalented. You will understand that saying this implies not the slightest deprecation. The Nathan Jesus-child was not in a position to familiarise himself with the products of human culture on earth. By contrast, the remarkable fact is that he could speak as soon as he was born. A faculty which belongs more to the physical body was thus present in him from his birth. But—according to a good tradition which can be occultly confirmed—the language he spoke could be understood by his Mother only. The child's most strongly marked characteristics were qualities of the heart. He had an immense capacity for love and a disposition capable of immense self-sacrifice. And the remarkable thing is that from the first days of his life his mere presence, or his touch, had beneficent effects—magnetic effects, one might perhaps call them nowadays. Thus all the qualities of heart were manifest in this child, enhanced to such a degree that they could have a beneficent magnetic influence on his environment.

We know also that active in the astral body of this child were the forces which had once been acquired by that Bodhisattva who became Gautama Buddha. We know indeed—and in this respect the oriental tradition is absolutely correct, for it can be confirmed by occult science—that the Bodhisattva, who on becoming Buddha five centuries before our era no longer needed to incarnate further on earth, worked from the spiritual world upon all those who devoted themselves to his teachings. It is characteristic of such an individuality, who rises to heights from which he need no longer incarnate in a body of flesh, that he can then take part in the affairs and destiny of our earth existence from out of the spiritual worlds. This can happen in the most manifold ways. In fact, the Bodhisattva who went through his last incarnation on the earth as Gautama Buddha has taken an essential part in the further evolution of humanity. Our human spiritual world stands continually in connection with all the rest of the spiritual world. The human being not only eats and drinks and so takes into himself the substance of the physical earth; he continually receives soul-spiritual nourishment from the spiritual world. In the most varied ways forces continually flow into physical earthly-existence from out of the spiritual world. Such an in-flow of the forces which Buddha had gained for himself came into the wider stream of humanity through the fact that the Buddha forces permeated the astral body of the Nathan Jesus-child. We know, too, from earlier lectures that the words we still have today as a Christmas message—‘The Divine reveals itself from the heights, and on earth peace will spread in the hearts of men of good will!’—originate in essence from the influence which flowed down into human evolution through the immersion of the Buddha powers in the astral body of the Nathan Jesus-child.

Thus we see the Buddha forces working further in the stream of earth-existence which took its start from the Events of Palestine. And it is interesting that precisely the researches made by western occultism in quite recent years have led to the recognition of a very important connection between European civilisation and the Buddha forces. For a long time these Buddha forces have been working from the spiritual worlds, particularly upon everything in Western civilisation which is unthinkable without the specific influence of Christianity. All those philosophical streams which have developed during recent centuries up to the nineteenth century, in so far as they are Western spiritual currents, are permeated by the Christ-Impulse, but the Buddha has always been working into them from out of the spiritual worlds. Hence the most important thing that European humanity can receive from Buddha today does not depend on the handing down of the teaching that Buddha gave to men about 500 years before the Christian era, but on what he has become since that time. For he has not remained at a standstill; he has progressed; and it is through this progress, as a spiritual being in the spiritual worlds, that he has in the highest sense been able to take part in the further evolution of Western civilisation. The outcome of our own occult investigation harmonises in a wonderful way with much that had been known previously, before this important influence could be investigated again. For we know that the same individuality who appeared as Gautama Buddha in the East had previously worked in the West, and that certain legends and traditions connected with the name of Buddha or Wotan have to do with this same individuality, just as Buddhism has with Gautama Buddha in the East; hence the same field of action in human evolution which had been prepared earlier by the same individuality has again been occupied in a certain sense. Thus are interlaced the ways taken by the spiritual currents within the evolution of humanity.

Today the most important thing for us is to establish that in the astral body of the Jesus-child described by Luke we have the Buddha forces at work. And when this Nathan Jesus-child was twelve years old, the Zarathustra individuality passed over into his three-fold being.

Why is it, then, that this Jesus-child had the remarkable qualities we have just characterised? It was because he was not a human individuality like every other, but in a certain respect quite different, and in order to understand him we must go back to the ancient Lemurian time in which, strictly speaking, the Earth-evolution of man took its start. We must clearly understand that everything before the Lemurian time was really only a repetition of the Saturn, Sun, and Moon periods. Only in the Lemurian time was the first germ-condition laid down in man as a potentiality, so that during the Earth-evolution he could receive the fourth member of his being, the Ego. We can say the extension of mankind over the Earth—a subject dealt with more precisely in the Outline of Occult Science—is to be traced to certain human ancestors in the Lemurian period, the period with which our present Earth took its start.

It is only after a certain point of time in this Lemurian period that we can speak correctly, in a modern sense, of the human race. Before this, those Egos who have since continued to incarnate were not present in men on Earth. They were not yet separate from the substance of that Hierarchy which had first brought the human Ego into being: the Hierarchy of the Spirits of Form. We can now picture to ourselves—occult research shows this—that part of the substance of the Spirits of Form entered into the incarnations of men for the building up of the human Ego. But when in due time man was given over to his physical incarnations on the Earth, something was held back. A certain Ego substance was not brought into the stream of physical incarnations. If we were to represent the stream of physical human incarnations, beginning with him whom the Bible calls ‘Adam’, the progenitor of the human race, we should have to draw a genealogical tree with wide-spreading branches. Instead, let us simply imagine that the substance poured down from the Spirits of Form now flows onward, but that something was held back: an Ego that was now protected from entering into physical incarnations. Instead, this Ego preserved the form, the substantiality, which man had had before proceeding to his first earthly incarnation. This Ego lived on collaterally with the rest of humanity, and at the time of which we are now speaking, when the Event of Palestine was to take place, it was still in the same condition, if we wish to speak according to the Bible, as was the Ego of Adam before his first embodiment in flesh.

In examining what occult science knows about this Ego—which naturally for modern man is something extremely foolish—we see that this Ego, which was, as it were, held back ‘in reserve’, was given into the care of the Holy Mysteries through Atlantean and post-Atlantean times. It was preserved in an important Mystery centre, as in a tabernacle, and because of this it had quite special characteristics; it was untouched by everything that a human Ego could have learnt on Earth. It was therefore untouched by any Luciferic and Ahrimanic influences; it was indeed something we can think of, in contrast to other human Egos, as an empty sphere, still completely virginal with regard to all earth experiences—a nothing, a negative, in this respect. Hence it seemed as though the Nathan-child, described in the Luke Gospel, really had no Ego; as though he consisted only of physical, etheric and astral body. And it is quite adequate if at first we say that an Ego, developed as Egos had developed in Atlantean and post-Atlantean times, was not there at all in the Luke Jesus-child.

We speak in the true sense of the words when we say that in the Matthew Jesus-child we have to do with a completely human being; whereas in the Nathan Jesus-child of the Luke Gospel we have to do with a physical, an etheric and an astral body which are interrelated in the harmonious unity that belonged to man when he emerged from the Saturn, Sun and Moon evolutions. Hence this Jesus-child, as the Akashic Record tells us, was untalented for all that human culture had developed. He could not receive it because he had never been among it. External abilities and adaptations to existence are the outcome of certain experiences in earlier incarnations. Anyone who had never shared in such experiences would show himself without talent for all that men have accomplished during the earth-evolution. If the Nathan Jesus-child had been born in our time, he would have been totally ungifted for learning to write, since in Adamic times writing was unknown. By contrast, the Luke Jesus-child revealed in a high degree the qualities he had brought with him—qualities that had not fallen into decadence through the Luciferic influence. Even more interesting is the remarkable language he spoke.

Here we must bring to mind something I mentioned in The Spiritual Guidance of Mankind: that the languages which are now spread over the earth took their rise comparatively late in evolution: they were preceded by what can truly be called a primal human language. It is the disuniting spirits of the Luciferic and Ahrimanic world who have made many languages out of the primal language. The primal language is lost, and can be spoken today by nobody with an Ego which in the course of earth-evolution has passed from incarnation to incarnation. This Jesus-child, who had not gone through human incarnations, acquired from the starting-point of human evolution the faculty of speaking, not this or that language, but a language of which we can rightly say that it was not comprehensible to those around him. But, because of the inner qualities of heart that lived in it, it was understood by his Mother's heart. This points to a phenomenon of immense significance in the case of the Luke Jesus-child.

We have seen that when this Luke Jesus-child was born, he was provided with everything that had not been influenced by the Lucifer-Ahrimanic forces. He did not possess an Ego that had been through a series of incarnations; therefore nothing had to be discarded when, in his twelfth year, the individuality of Zarathustra passed over from the Solomon Jesus-child into the Nathan Jesus-child. I have already said that the human element which had remained behind, and up to this time had developed in the Mysteries by the side of the rest of humanity, was born for the first time in the Palestine period as the Nathan Jesus-child. There was a transference from a Mystery centre in Western Asia, where this human kernel had been preserved, into the body of the Nathan Jesus-child. This child grew on, and in his twelfth year the individuality of Zarathustra passed into him. We know also that this passing over is intimated in the scene of the twelve-year-old Jesus in the Temple. It was quite natural that the parents of the Nathan Jesus-child, who were accustomed to regard him in the light we have described, should find a remarkable change when they discovered him in the Temple after he had been lost. For that was the moment when Zarathustra passed over into this twelve-year-old child. From the twelfth to the thirtieth year, therefore, we have to do with the individuality of Zarathustra in the Luke Jesus-child.

Now in the Luke Gospel we have a remarkable expression which indicates something that can be made clear only by occult investigation. You know that in the Luke Gospel, after the description of the scene with the twelve-year-old Jesus in the Temple, there is a passage: ‘And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man’. (Luke II:52). In truth this passage stands as follows when we restore the text of the Gospels from the Akashic record: The twelve-year-old child increased in everything wherein an astral body can increase, i.e., in wisdom; in everything wherein an etheric body can increase, i.e. in all the qualities of kindliness, goodness, etc; and in everything wherein a physical body can increase, i.e., in all that pours itself into external beauty of form. In this passage, therefore, a special indication is given that the Jesus-child, not having gone from incarnation to incarnation, had up to his twelfth year remained untouched, and could not be touched in his individuality, by the Luciferic and Ahrimanic forces. The Luke Gospel intimates this again by tracing the sequence of generations back through Adam to God, thus indicating that the substance in question was uninfluenced by all that had taken place in human evolution.

So this Jesus-child lived on, increasing in all that was possible for a three-fold organism not touched by the contamination which has affected the three-fold bodies of other men. And this enabled the individuality of Zarathustra, from the twelfth to the thirtieth year of life, to pour into this three-fold human being all that could come from the heights to which he himself had previously attained. Hence we form a correct idea of Jesus of Nazareth, up to the thirtieth year of his life, when we think of him as a lofty human individuality, for whose coming into existence the greatest possible preparations had been made.

But we must now be clear about one thing if we want to understand how the fruits of a development we go through in our bodies are of benefit to the individuality. Our bodies enable our individuality to absorb the fruits of our life for its future evolution. When in death we forsake our bodies, we do not usually leave in them what we have achieved and gained for ourselves as individuals. Later on we shall see under what special conditions something may remain in the bodies; but it is not the rule that the individuality should leave behind in his bodies whatever he has won for himself. When Zarathustra forsook the threefold bodily being of Jesus of Nazareth in the thirtieth year, he left behind the three bodies, physical, etheric, and astral. But all that he had been able to gain through these instruments went into the individuality of Zarathustra and lived on further with him, to his benefit. Something however, was gained by the three-fold bodily organism of Jesus of Nazareth. His human nature, still free, as it always had been, from Luciferic and Ahrimanic influences, was conjoined for a period with the individuality who had unequalled insight into the spirituality of the cosmos.

Think what this Zarathustra had experienced! While he was founding the ancient Persian civilisation and looking up to the great Sun Spirit, he was even then gazing out into the cosmic realms of the spiritual. Through successive incarnations his development went on. When the innermost part of human nature, together with the most intensive powers of sympathy and love, had become manifest through the unsullied human substance which had been preserved until the birth of the Nathan Jesus, and when the astral body had permeated itself with the forces of Gautama Buddha, there was present in this child what we may call the most intimate inwardness of man. And then into this bodily nature there entered the individuality who above all others had seen most clearly and deeply into the spirituality of the Macrocosm. By this means the bodily instrument, the entire organism, of the Nathan Jesus was so transformed that it could be the vehicle capable of receiving into itself the Christ-extract of the Macrocosm. If this bodily nature had not been permeated by the Zarathustra-individuality up to the thirtieth year, the eyes would not have been able to endure the substance of the Christ from the thirtieth year up to the Mystery of Golgotha; the hands would not have been capable of being permeated with the substance of the Christ in the thirtieth year. To be able to receive the Christ, this bodily nature had to be prepared, expanded, through the individuality of Zarathustra. Thus in Jesus of Nazareth, as he was at the moment when Zarathustra took leave of him and the Christ-Individuality entered into him, we have to do neither with an adept, nor with anything like a higher human being. For an adept is an adept because he has a highly developed individuality, and it was just this that had passed out of the threefold bodily nature of Jesus of Nazareth. We have simply the bodily nature so prepared through the indwelling of Zarathustra that it could take into itself the Christ-Individuality. But now, through the union of the Christ-Individuality with this bodily nature, by necessity the following consequence came about.

During these three years, from the Baptism by John in Jordan onwards to the Mystery of Golgotha, the development of the physical body, the etheric body, and the astral body was quite different from the bodily development of other human beings. Since the Nathan Jesus had received no influence from the Luciferic and Ahrimanic powers, the possibility was given that, from the Baptism in Jordan onwards—now that there was in Jesus of Nazareth no human Ego, but solely the Christ Individuality—everything which is normally at work in a human organism was not developed.

We said yesterday that the human Phantom, the primal form which draws into itself the material elements that fill out the physical body and are laid aside at death, had degenerated in the course of time up to the Mystery of Golgotha. At the beginning of human evolution it was intended that the Phantom should remain untouched by the material elements that man takes for his nutrition from the animal, plant, and mineral kingdoms. But it did not remain untouched. For the Luciferic influence brought about a close connection between the Phantom and the forces which man absorbs through his earthly evolution; a connection particularly with the ashy constituents. The result was that the Phantom, while continuing to accompany man during his further evolution, was strongly drawn to these ashy constituents, and instead of adhering to the etheric body, it attached itself to these products of disintegration. But where the Luciferic influences had been kept away, as they were from the Nathan Jesus, no force of attraction arose between the Phantom and the material elements that had been taken into the bodily organism. Throughout the three years from the Baptism up to the Mystery of Golgotha, the Phantom remained untouched by these elements.

In occult terms we can say: The human Phantom, according to its intended development through the Saturn, Sun, and Moon periods, should not have been attracted to the ashy constituents but only to the dissolving salt constituents, so that it would have taken the path of volatilisation in so far as the salt constituents dissolved. In an occult sense one can say that it would have dissolved and passed over, not into the earth but into the volatile constituents. The remarkable fact is that with the Baptism in Jordan and the entry of the Christ Individuality into the body of the Nathan Jesus, all connection of the Phantom with the ashy constituents was wiped out; only the connection with the salt constituents remained.

This is alluded to in the passage where Christ Jesus wishes to explain to his first-chosen disciples: ‘Through the way in which you feel yourselves united with the Christ Being, a certain possibility for the future evolution of humanity will come about. It will be possible for the one body risen from the grave—the spiritual body—to pass over into men’. That is what Christ wished to say when he used the phrase, ‘You are the salt of the earth’. All these words we find in the Gospels, reminding us of the terminology and craft language of the later alchemists, the later occultism, have the deepest imaginable significance. And in fact this significance was well known to the mediaeval and later alchemists—not to the charlatans mentioned in the history books—and not one of them spoke of these connections without feeling in his heart a connection with Christ.

Thus it followed that when Christ Jesus was crucified, when his body was nailed to the Cross—you will notice that here I use the exact words of the Gospel, for they are con-firmed by true occult research—when this body of Jesus of Nazareth was fastened to the Cross, the Phantom was perfectly intact; it existed in a spiritual bodily form, visible only to super-sensible sight, and was much more loosely connected with the body's material content of earth-elements than has ever happened with any other human being. In every other human being a connection of the Phantom with these elements has occurred, and it is this that holds them together. In the case of Christ Jesus it was quite different. The ordinary law of inertia sees to it that certain material portions of a human body hold together after death in the form man has given them, until after some time they crumble away, so that hardly anything of them is visible. So it was with the material portions of the body of Christ Jesus. When the body was taken down from the Cross, the parts were still coherent, but they had no connection with the Phantom; the Phantom was completely free of them. When the body became permeated with certain substances, which in this case worked quite differently from the way in which they affect any other body that is embalmed, it came to pass that after the burial the material parts quickly volatilised and passed over into the elements. Hence the disciples who looked into the grave found the linen cloths in which the body had been wrapped, but the Phantom, on which the evolution of the Ego depends, had risen from the grave. It is not surprising that Mary of Magdala, who had known only the earlier Phantom when it was permeated by earthly elements, did not recognise the same form in the Phantom, now freed from terrestrial gravity, when she saw it clairvoyantly. It seemed to her different.

Moreover we must clearly understand that it was only through the power of the companionship of the disciples with the Christ that all the disciples, and all those persons of whom the same is told, could see the Risen One, for He appeared to them in the spiritual body, the body of which Paul says that it increases as a grain of seed and passes over into all people. Paul himself is convinced that it was not a body permeated by the earthly elements which had appeared to the other apostles, but that the same which had appeared to him had also appeared to them, as he says in the following passage:

For I have delivered unto you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures, that He was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures; and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. Then he appeared to more than five hundred brethren at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. Then He appeared to James, then to all the apostles. Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me. (I Corinthians XV:3–8.)

But what was it that convinced Paul? In a certain sense Paul was an Initiate before the Event of Damascus. His Initiation had combined the ancient Hebrew principle and the Greek principle. He knew that an Initiate became, in his etheric body, independent of the physical body, and could appear in the purest form of his etheric body to those who were capable of seeing it. If Paul had had the vision of a pure etheric body, independent of a physical body, he would have spoken differently. He would have said that he had seen someone who had been initiated and would be living on further in the course of earth-evolution, independently of the physical body. He would not have found this particularly surprising. What Paul experienced on the road to Damascus could not have been that. He had experienced something which he knew could be experienced only when the Scriptures were fulfilled; when a perfect human Phantom, a human body risen from the grave in a super-sensible form, would appear in the spiritual atmosphere of the earth. And that is what he saw! That is what appeared to him on the road to Damascus and left him with the conviction: ‘He was there—He is risen! For what is there could come only from Him: it is the Phantom which can be seen by all human individualities who seek to relate themselves to the Christ.’ This is what convinced him that Christ was already there; that he would not come first in the future, but was actually present there in a physical body, and that this physical body had rescued the primal form of the human physical body for the salvation of all men.

That this deed could be accomplished only through the greatest unfolding of divine love, and in what sense it was an act of love, and then in what sense the word ‘salvation’ is to be understood in the further evolution of humanity—this will be our subject tomorrow.

Achter Vortrag

Es ist gestern angedeutet worden, daß es nun wichtig wird, uns die Frage zu beantworten: Was ist eigentlich geschehen mit jener Wesenheit, die wir als den Christus Jesus bezeichnen, von der JohannesTaufe im Jordan an bis zu dem Mysterium von Golgatha? Um diese Frage so weit zu beantworten, als es zunächst möglich ist, werden wir kurz uns vergegenwärtigen, was wir aus früheren Vorträgen wissen über das Leben des Jesus von Nazareth, der dann in seinem dreißigsten Jahre der Christus-Träger wurde. In wenigen Worten ist ja das Wesentliche auch angedeutet in meiner kürzlich erschienenen Schrift über «Die geistige Führung des Menschen und der Menschheit».

Wir wissen, daß in Palästina in derjenigen Zeit, auf die es ankommt, nicht ein, sondern zwei Jesusknaben geboren worden sind, und zwar wurde das eine Kind geboren aus der salomonischen Linie des Hauses David. Es ist im wesentlichen dasjenige Jesuskind, wovon das Matthäus-Evangelium erzählt. Der eigentümliche Widerspruch im Beginne des Matthäus- und des Lukas-Evangeliums rührt eben davon her, daß sich die Angaben des Schreibers des Matthäus-Evangeliums auf den einen Jesusknaben beziehen, den aus der salomonischen Linie des Hauses David. Dann wurde, nicht ganz, aber ziemlich gleichzeitig, ein anderer Jesusknabe geboren aus der nathanischen Linie des Hauses David. Das Wichtige ist nun, sich klarzumachen, was das für Wesenheiten waren. Da zeigt die okkulte Forschung, daß die Individualität, die in dem salomonischen Jesusknaben war, keine andere ist als die des Zarathustra. Zarathustra war nach seiner hauptsächlichsten Mission, von der wir bei der urpersischen Kultur gesprochen haben, immer wieder und wieder inkarniert worden, zuletzt auch innerhalb der babylonisch-chaldäischen Kultur, und dann eben als dieser salomonische Jesusknabe. Es war notwendig, daß diese Zarathustra-Individualität sich zunächst mit all den großen, starken, inneren Kräften, die sie sich naturgemäß aus den früheren Inkarnationen mitbrachte, in einem Leib inkarnierte, der aus der salomonischen Linie des Hauses David stammte, und der geeignet war, die großen Fähigkeiten des Zarathustra zu verarbeiten und sie in der Weise weiterzubringen, wie menschliche Fähigkeiten weitergebracht werden können, die schon auf einer sehr hohen Stufe stehen, insofern sie der Wesenheit angehören, die von Inkarnation zu Inkarnation geht. Es handelt sich also um einen menschlichen Leib, der jetzt diese Fähigkeiten nicht erst in einem späteren Alter, sondern in einer jugendlichen, kindhaft kräftigen Organisation verarbeiten kann. Wir sehen daher die Zarathustra-Individualität heranwachsen in einer solchen Art, daß sich die Fähigkeiten des Knaben verhältnismäßig früh entwickeln. Dieser Knabe zeigte früh sogar gewisse Kenntnisse, die sonst unmöglich in einem solchen kindlichen Alter sind. Aber das eine müssen wir feststellen, daß dieser salomonische Jesusknabe, trotzdem er die Verkörperung einer so hohen Individualität war, eben ein hochstehender Mensch war, das heißt, daß er in derselben Art, wie selbst der höchststehende Mensch, behaftet war mit gewissen Fähigkeiten zu irren, mit gewissen Fähigkeiten auch zu moralischen Schwierigkeiten, wenn auch nicht gerade zu Lastern oder Sünden. Dann wissen wir, daß die Individualität des Zarathustra im Sinne eines okkulten Vorganges, der jedem bekannt ist, der sich überhaupt mit solchen Tatsachen vertraut gemacht hat, im zwölften Jahre den Leib des salomonischen Jesusknaben verließ und hinüberging in den Leib des nathanischen Jesusknaben. Nun war der Leib dieses nathanischen Jesusknaben, oder besser gesagt, die dreifache Leiblichkeit: physischer Leib, Ätherleib und Astralleib dieses Knaben in einer ganz besonderen Art beschaffen. Denn dieser Leib war in der Tat so, daß der Knabe, der ihn hatte, gerade die entgegengesetzten Fähigkeiten zeigte wie der salomonische Jesusknabe. Während der letztere auffiel durch seine große Begabung in bezug auf äußere Dinge, die man eben äußerlich lernen kann, könnte man den nathanischen Jesusknaben in bezug auf äußere Dinge, man möchte fast sagen — Sie werden begreifen, daß dies auch nicht in der geringsten Weise abfällig gesagt werden kann — unbegabt nennen. Er war nicht in der Lage, sich hineinzufinden in diejenigen Dinge, welche die Menschenkultur auf der Erde geschaffen hat. Dagegen tritt das Merkwürdige hervor, daß er gleich von der Geburt an sprechen konnte. Also das, was mehr körperlich ist, zeigte sich als schon von der Geburt an vorhandene Fähigkeit. Es ist eine ganz richtige Überlieferung, daß er, allerdings in einer für alle andern Menschen unverständlichen Sprache, gesprochen hat. Aber was gerade in dieser Sprache von der Geburt an drinnen lag, von dem wird erzählt — und es ist dies eine gute Überlieferung, die auch okkult festgestellt werden kann —, daß von der Mutter verstanden werden konnte, was dieser Knabe sagte. Es ist so, daß gerade diejenigen Eigenschaften bei dem Knaben ausgeprägt waren, die wir die Herzenseigenschaften nennen können; eine ungeheure Liebefähigkeit und ein ungeheuer hingebungsfähiges Naturell zeichneten diesen Knaben aus. Und das Merkwürdige war, daß er von dem ersten Tage seines Lebens an durch seine bloße Gegenwart oder auch durch seine Berührung wohltätige Wirkungen ausübte, Wirkungen, die man heute vielleicht magnetische Wirkungen nennen würde. Also alle Herzenseigenschaften — und die Herzenseigenschaften so gesteigert, daß sie zu.einer magnetischen Wohltat für die Umgebung werden konnten, zeigten sich bei diesem Knaben.

Wir wissen auch, daß in dem Astralleib dieses Knaben die Kräfte wirkten, welche sich einstmals jener Bodhisattva erworben hatte, der dann der Gotama Buddha wurde. Wir wissen ja — und in dieser Beziehung ist die orientalische Überlieferung absolut richtig, denn sie kann geprüft werden von der Geheimwissenschaft —, daß der Bodhisattva, der ein halbes Jahrtausend vor unserer Zeitrechnung mit dem Buddhawerden die Notwendigkeit verloren hatte, sich weiter in physischen Leibern auf der Erde zu inkarnieren, von da ab namentlich zunächst auf alle diejenigen wirkte, welche sich seinem Bekenntnisse hingaben, aber nurmehr aus der geistigen Welt herunter. Das ist das Eigentümliche einer solchen Individualität, die aufsteigt bis zu der Höhe, wo sie nicht mehr in einem fleischlichen Leibe inkarniert wird, daß sie dann teilnehmen kann an den Angelegenheiten und Schicksalen unseres Erdendaseins von den geistigen Welten herunter. Das kann in der mannigfaltigsten Weise geschehen. In der Tat hat der Bodhisattva, der als Gotama Buddha seine letzte fleischliche Inkarnation auf der Erde hatte, im wesentlichen mit teilgenommen an der Weiterentwickelung der Menschheit. Denn seien wir uns nur darüber klar, daß unsere menschliche geistige Welt fortwährend im Zusammenhang steht mit der ganzen übrigen geistigen Welt. Seien wir uns darüber klar, daß der Mensch nicht nur ißt und trinkt und damit die Stoffe der physischen Erde in sich aufnimmt, sondern aus der geistigen Welt fortwährend seelisch geistige Nahrung empfängt, daß fortwährend auf die verschiedensten Weisen aus den geistigen Welten Kräfte einfließen in das physische, irdische Dasein. Ein solches Einfließen der Kräfte, die sich Buddha erworben hatte, in den weiteren Strom der Menschheit geschah dadurch, daß die Buddha-Kräfte den Astralleib des nathanischen Jesusknaben durchsetzten, so daß in dem Astralleib dieses Knaben das wirkte, was der Buddha in seiner damaligen Form der Menschheit zu geben hatte. Wir wissen ja auch aus früheren Vorträgen, daß im wesentlichen die Worte, die wir heute noch als Weihnachtsspruch haben: «Offenbarung läßt sich erkennen aus der Höhe der Welten, und Friede wird sich breiten auf Erden in den Herzen derer, die eines guten Willens sind!», herrühren aus dem, was herniederfloß in die Menschheitsentwickelung dadurch, daß die Buddhakräfte eintauchten in den Astralleib des nathanischen Jesusknaben. So sehen wir die Buddhakräfte weiterwirken in dem Strom des Erdendaseins, der durch die Ereignisse von Palästina seinen Ausgangspunkt nahm. Diese Buddha-Kräfte haben dann auch weiter gewirkt. Und es ist immerhin sehr interessant, daß gerade die neueren okkulten Forschungen, die im westlichen Okkultismus in den allerletzten Jahren gemacht worden sind, dazu geführt haben, zu erkennen, daß ein sehr wichtiger Zusammenhang der europäischen Kultur mit den Buddha-Kräften vorhanden ist. Seit langer Zeit nämlich wirken herein aus den geistigen Welten diese Buddha-Kräfte namentlich auf alles dasjenige, was in der abendländischen Kultur ohne den spezifisch christlichen Einfluß undenkbar ist. Also alle diejenigen Weltanschauungsströmungen, die wir in den letzten Jahrhunderten bis herauf ins neunzehnte Jahrhundert sich entwickeln sehen, sie sind, insofern es abendländische Geistesströmungen sind, alle durchdrungen von dem Christus-Impuls, aber es wirkte immer herein der Buddha aus der geistigen Welt. Daher dürfen wir sagen: Das Wichtigste, was die europäische Menschheit heute von dem Buddha empfangen kann, darf eben nicht herrühren aus der Überlieferung dessen, was der Buddha ein halbes Jahrtausend vor der christlichen Zeitrechnung den Menschen gegeben hat, sondern von dem, was er seither geworden ist. Denn er ist ja nicht stehengeblieben, sondern fortgeschritten; und gerade durch diesen Fortschritt als geistiges Wesen in den geistigen Welten hat er im eminentesten Sinne teilnehmen können an der Fortentwickelung der abendländischen Kultur. Es ist dies durchaus ein Resultat innerhalb unserer okkulten Forschung, daß mit vielem, was uns schon früher hat entgegentreten können, bevor dieser wichtige Einfluß genau wieder erforscht worden ist, gerade dieses Resultat in einer wunderbaren Weise zusammenstimmt. Denn wir wissen, daß dieselbe Individualität, die als Gotama Buddha im Osten auftrat, schon früher einmal im Westen gewirkt hat, und daß gewisse Legenden und Überlieferungen, die an den Namen Bodha oder Wotan anknüpfen, es mit derselben Individualität zu tun haben, wie der Buddhismus mit dem Gotama Buddha im Osten; so daß in gewisser Weise derselbe Schauplatz wieder eingenommen ist, der schon früher von der gleichen Individualität in bezug auf die Menschheitsentwickelung vorbereitet worden war. So verschlungen sind die Wege, welche die geistigen Strömungen innerhalb der Menschheitsentwickelung nehmen.

Heute ist nun für uns am wichtigsten, daß wir in dem Astralleib des Lukas-Jesusknaben die Buddha-Kräfte wirksam haben. Als nun dieser Jesusknabe zwölf Jahre alt ist, geht die Zarathustra-Individualität hinüber in die dreifache Leiblichkeit dieses nathanischen Jesusknaben. Woher rührte es denn, daß dieser Jesusknabe die merkwürdigen Eigenschaften hatte, die wir eben charakterisiert haben? Das rührte eben davon her, daß dieser Jesusknabe nicht eine menschliche Individualität war wie jede andere. Diese Individualität war in einer gewissen Weise ganz anders, und um sie zu verstehen, müssen wir schon zurückgehen in die alte lemurische Zeit, in welcher im Grunde genommen erst die irdische Entwickelung der Menschen so recht den Anfang genommen hat. Wir müssen uns darüber klar sein, daß alles, was vor der lemurischen Zeit lag, eigentlich nur eine Wiederholung war des Saturn-, Sonnen- und Mondendaseins, und daß erst da die erste Keimanlage — als Möglichkeit — in den Menschen gelegt worden ist, so daß er das vierte Glied seiner Wesenheit in der Erdentwickelung annehmen konnte: das Ich. Wenn wir die ganze Strömung der Menschheitsentwickelung nehmen, müssen wir sagen: Die Menschheit, wie sie sich über die Erde verbreitet hat — Sie haben diese Weiterverbreitung genauer in der «Geheimwissenschaft im Umriß» dargestellt —, ist in der lemurischen Zeit auf gewisse menschliche Vorfahren dieser Anfangsperiode unserer heutigen Erde zurückzuführen. Und wir müssen dabei in der lemurischen Zeit einen Zeitpunkt festsetzen, nach welchem im heutigen Sinne erst richtig vom Menschengeschlecht gesprochen werden kann. Was vorher war, kann noch nicht so besprochen werden, daß man sagen könnte, es wären schon jene Iche in den Erdenmenschen vorhanden gewesen, die sich dann immer weiter und weiter inkarniert haben. Das war nicht der Fall. Vorher war das Ich des Menschen keineswegs noch abgetrennt von der Substanz derjenigen Hierarchie, die zunächst zu diesem Ich des Menschen die Veranlassung gegeben hat, von der Hierarchie der Geister der Form. Wir können uns nun vorstellen — das zeigt die okkulte Forschung —, daß gleichsam ein Teil der Substanz der Geister der Form eingegangen ist in die menschlichen Inkarnationen zur menschlichen Ich-Bildung. Aber als damals der Mensch seinen fleischlichen Inkarnationen auf der Erde übergeben worden ist, wurde von dem, was Mensch werden sollte, etwas zurückbehalten. Es wurde also gleichsam eine Ich-Substanz zurückbehalten, die nicht in den Strom der fleischlichen Inkarnationen geleitet wurde. Wenn wir uns diesen Strom der fleischlichen Inkarnationen des Menschen vorstellen wollten, der da beginnt mit dem, was die Bibel den Stammvater des Menschengeschlechtes, den Adam nennt, so müßten wir einen weitverzweigten Stammbaum zeichnen. Aber wir können uns einfach vorstellen: was von den Geistern der Form heruntergeströmt worden ist, das fließt nun fort; nur wurde gleichsam etwas zurückbehalten, gleichsam ein Ich, das nun bewahrt wurde vor dem Eingehen in die fleischlichen Inkarnationen — ein Ich, das nicht immer als Mensch wiedererschien, sondern das jene Gestalt, jene Substantialität behielt, die der Mensch hatte, bevor er zu seiner ersten Erdeninkarnation fortgeschritten war. Also ein Ich, das fortlebte neben der übrigen Menschheit, und das bis zu der Zeit, von der wir jetzt sprechen, wo die Ereignisse von Palästina geschehen sollten, noch nicht in einem menschlichen physischen Leibe jemals verkörpert gewesen war, ein Ich, das noch in derselben Lage war wie — wenn wir jetzt biblisch sprechen wollten — das Ich des Adam vor seiner ersten irdischen fleischlichen Verkörperung. Ein solches Ich war immer vorhanden.

Wenn wir nun die okkulten Erkenntnisse über dieses Ich, die natürlich für den heutigen Menschen etwas ungeheuer 'Törichtes sind, ein wenig berühren, so sehen wir, daß dieses Ich, das gleichsam in Reserve zurückbehalten wurde, nicht in einen Menschenleib geleitet worden ist, sondern eigentlich nur übergeben worden ist den heiligen Mysterien, wie sie bestanden haben durch die atlantischen Zeiten, durch die nachatlantischen Zeiten hindurch. In einer wichtigen Mysterienstätte war es wie in einem Tabernakel aufbewahrt. Dieses Ich hatte dadurch ganz besondere Eigentümlichkeiten; es hatte die Eigentümlichkeit, daß es unberührt war von allem, was überhaupt ein menschliches Ich jemals auf der Erde hatte lernen können. Es war also auch unberührt von allen luziferischen und ahrimanischen Einflüssen; war überhaupt etwas, was wir uns gegenüber den anderen Ichen der Menschen vorstellen können wie eine leere Kugel, eigentlich nur wie etwas, was noch vollständig jungfräulich war gegenüber allen Erdenerlebnissen, ein Nichts, ein Negatives gegenüber allen Erdenerlebnissen. Daher sah es so aus, als ob jener nathanische Jesusknabe, den das Lukas-Evangelium schildert, überhaupt kein Menschen-Ich hätte, als ob er nur bestünde aus physischem Leib, Ätherleib und Astralleib. Und es genügt vollständig, wenn wir zunächst sagen: ein so entwickeltes Ich, wie es sich durch die atlantische und nachatlantische Zeit entwickelt hatte, ist bei dem Lukas- Jesusknaben gar nicht vorhanden. Im rechten Sinne des Wortes sprechen wir, wenn wir sagen: beim Matthäus-Jesusknaben haben wir es mit einem völlig ausgebildeten Menschen zu tun; bei dem nathanischen Jesusknaben des Lukas-Evangeliums haben wir es zu tun mit einem physischen Leib, Ätherleib und Astralleib, die so angeordnet sind, daß sie harmonisch darstellen den Menschen, wie er herüberkam als Resultat der Saturn-, Sonnen- und Mondentwickelung. Daher war dieser Jesusknabe, wie die Akasha-Chronik es lehrt, unbegabt für alles, was die menschliche Kultur entwickelt hatte; das konnte er nicht aufnehmen, weil er nie dabeigewesen war. Was die äußeren Geschicklichkeiten und Fertigkeiten des Daseins sind, das zeigen wir, weil wir in früheren Inkarnationen bei gewissen Verrichtungen schon dabei waren; jemand, der nie dabei war, zeigt sich unbegabt für alles, was Menschen geleistet haben während der Erdentwickelung. Wenn der nathanische Jesusknabe in unsere Zeit hineingeboren worden wäre, würde er sich höchst unbegabt gezeigt haben in bezug auf Schreibenlernen, weil die Menschen zu Adams Zeiten nicht geschrieben haben und vorher erst recht nicht. Also, für alles was so war, daß es erst im Laufe der Menschheitsentwickelung angeeignet wurde, zeigte sich der LukasJesusknabe höchst unbegabt. Dagegen die inneren Eigenschaften, die er sich mitgebracht hatte, die sonst nur eigentlich in die Dekadenz gekommen waren durch die luziferischen Einflüsse, die zeigten sich in einem hohen Grade. Und daß dieser Jesusknabe eine merkwürdige Sprache zeigte, das ist etwas noch viel Interessanteres. Denn da müssen wir auf etwas blicken, was ich auch in meiner Schrift über «Die geistige Führung des Menschen und der Menschheit» erwähnt habe: daß die Sprachen, die heute über die Erde verbreitet sind, die bei den verschiedenen Volksstämmen auftreten, verhältnismäßig spät innerhalb der Menschheitsentwickelung entstanden sind; ihnen aber ging voraus, was man wirklich eine menschliche Ursprache nennen könnte. Und die trennenden Geister der luziferischen und ahrimanischen Welt sind es, die aus der Ursprache die vielen Sprachen in der Welt gemacht haben. Die Ursprache ist verloren und kann heute mit einem solchen Ich, das im Laufe der Erdentwickelung von Inkarnation zu Inkarnation gegangen ist, von keinem Menschen zunächst gesprochen werden. Jener Jesusknabe, der nicht durch menschliche Inkarnationen gegangen war, bekam vom Ausgangspunkte der Menschheitsentwickelung die Fähigkeit mit, nun nicht diese oder jene Sprache, sondern eine Sprache zu sprechen, von der mit einem gewissen Recht behauptet wird, daß sie nicht verständlich war für die Umgebung, die aber durch das, was drinnen lebte an Herzinnigkeit, von dem Mutterherzen verstanden wurde. Es wird damit auf ein ungeheuer bedeutendes Phänomen bei diesem Lukas-Jesusknaben hingewiesen.

Als dieser Lukas-Jesusknabe geboren war, war er also ausgestattet mit alledem, was unbeeinflußt war von den luziferisch-ahrimanischen Kräften. Ein solches Ich, das sich immer wieder und wieder inkarniert hatte, hatte er nicht; daher brauchte auch nichts ausgestoßen zu werden in seinem zwölften Lebensjahre, als die Individualität des Zarathustra herüberging aus dem salomonischen Jesusknaben des Matthäus-Evangeliums in den nathanischen Jesusknaben. Ich sagte vorhin, daß dieses zurückgebliebene Menschenteil, das sich bis dahin neben der übrigen Menschheit in den Mysterien entwickelt hatte, eigentlich jetzt zum ersten Male in der palästinensischen Zeit als der nathanische Jesusknabe geboren worden war. Es war ein Überleiten aus einem vorderasiatischen Mysterium, wo dieser Menschenkeim aufbewahrt war, in den Leib des nathanischen Jesusknaben. Nun wuchs dieser Knabe heran, und im zwölften Jahre überkam ihn die Individualität des Zarathustra. Wir wissen auch, daß uns dieses Herübergehen angedeutet wird durch die Szene des zwölfjährigen Jesus im Tempel. Es ist verständlich, daß die Eltern des nathanischen Jesusknaben, die gewohnt waren, dieses Kind so zu betrachten, wie wir es eben beschrieben haben, eine merkwürdige Veränderung finden mußten, als sie den Knaben im Tempel wiederfanden, nachdem sie ihn vorher verloren hatten. Denn das war der Zeitpunkt, wo in den zwölfjährigen Knaben hinüberzog die Individualität des Zarathustra, so daß wir jetzt weiter, vom zwölften bis zum dreißigsten Jahre, in dem Lukas-Jesusknaben die Individualität des Zarathustra haben.

Nun haben wir im Lukas-Evangelium einen merkwürdigen Ausspruch, mit dem auf etwas hingedeutet wird, was erst durch die okkulte Forschung klar werden kann. Sie wissen, daß es im LukasEvangelium, nachdem die Szene mit dem zwölfjährigen Jesus im Tempel geschildert worden ist, eine Stelle gibt: «Und Jesus nahm zu an Weisheit und Gestalt und Gnade bei Gott und den Menschen» (Lukas 2, 52). So lautet sie in der Weizsäckerschen Übersetzung. Luther übersetzt: «Und Jesus nahm zu an Weisheit, Alter und Gnade bei Gott und den Menschen». Sehr sinnvoll ist das auch nicht. Denn wenn da steht «Jesus nahm zu an Alter», so möchte ich einmal wissen, was es heißen soll, daß ein zwölfjähriger Knabe zunimmt an Alter? Es braucht dazu doch nur die Zeit vorwärts zu schreiten! In Wahrheit aber steht an dieser Stelle, wenn wir den Text der Evangelien aus der Akasha-Chronik herstellen, daß er zunahm an alledem, woran ein astralischer Leib zunehmen kann, nämlich an Weisheit; daß er zunahm an alledem, woran ein Ätherleib zunehmen kann, nämlich an all den Eigenschaften der Güte, des Wohlwollens und so weiter; und dann zunahm an allem, woran ein physischer Leib zunehmen kann, was sich hineingießt in die äußere Wohlgestalt. Damit soll ganz besonders angedeutet werden, daß dieser Jesusknabe durch die Eigentümlichkeit, die er bis zum zwölften Jahre hatte, unberührt geblieben war, in seiner Individualität gar nicht berührt werden konnte von den luziferischen und ahrimanischen Kräften; weil es eben keine solche Individualität war, die von Inkarnation zu Inkarnation gegangen war. Das Lukas-Evangelium deutet das noch ganz besonders dadurch an, daß es die Generationenreihe hinauf verfolgt über Adam bis zu Gott, um damit zu sagen, daß es die Substanz war, die unbeeinflußt war von allem, was durch die menschliche Entwickelung gegangen ist.

So lebt also dieser Jesusknabe heran, zunehmend an alledem, was möglich ist in der Entwickelung einer dreifachen Leiblichkeit, die eben nicht von dem berührt werden konnte, wovon andere dreifache Leiblichkeiten der Menschen berührt werden. Und die ZarathustraIndividualität hatte jetzt die Möglichkeit, all die Höhe, zu der sie es bis dahin gebracht hatte, zu verbinden mit all dem Wunderbaren, was in einer solchen dreifachen Leiblichkeit war, weil sie durch nichts beirrt ward, sondern alles entwickeln konnte, was nur ein idealer physischer Leib, ein idealer Ätherleib, ein idealer astralischer Leib im Außern entwickeln kann. Das soll angedeutet werden mit dem Satz des Lukas-Evangeliums, der eben angeführt worden ist. Dadurch war die Möglichkeit gegeben, daß bis zum dreißigsten Lebensjahre in der Entwickelung dieses Jünglings etwas eingetreten war, von dem wir sagen können: im dreißigsten Lebensjahre war diese Individualität des Zarathustra in der Lage, alles, was aus einer so hohen Individualität kommen kann, in diese dreifache menschliche Leiblichkeit hineinzugießen. So daß wir uns bis zum dreißigsten Lebensjahre von dem Jesus von Nazareth die richtige Vorstellung machen, wenn wir ihn als eine hohe menschliche Individualität vorstellen; eben als eine Individualität, zu derem Zustandekommen die größtmöglichen Veranstaltungen gemacht worden sind, wie wir gesehen haben.

Aber jetzt müssen wir uns über eines klar werden, wenn wir uns darüber verständigen wollen, daß die Früchte einer Entwickelung, die wir in unsern Leibern durchmachen, der Individualität zugute kommen. Unsere Leiber geben uns die Veranlassung, daß gleichsam unsere Individualität aus dem Leben heraussaugt die Früchte für ihre weitere Entwickelung. Wenn wir im Tode — jetzt im Tode eines gewöhnlichen Menschen — unsere Leiber verlassen, so lassen wir das, was wir in ihnen als Individualität uns erworben, uns erarbeitet haben, zunächst nicht in den Leibern. Wir werden später noch sehen, unter welchen besonderen Umständen etwas in den Leibern bleiben kann; aber die Regel, das Gesetz ist es nicht, daß die Individualität das, was sie sich erworben hat, den Leibern zurückläßt. Indem also Zarathustra die dreifache Leiblichkeit des Jesus von Nazareth im dreißigsten Jahre verläßt, läßt er zurück die drei Leiber: physischen Leib, Ätherleib und Astralleib. Alles dasjenige aber, was Zarathustra als Individualität durch diese Werkzeuge hat gewinnen können, das geht in die Individualität des Zarathustra hinein, lebt mit dieser Individualität weiter, die jetzt herausgeht aus der dreifachen Leiblichkeit. Das kommt dieser Individualität zugute. Dagegen ist allerdings eines erreicht worden in der dreifachen Leiblichkeit des Jesus von Nazareth: daß nämlich die Menschennatur, wie sie war vor den luziferischen und ahrimanischen Einflüssen, verbunden war mit derjenigen Individualität, die am bedeutsamsten hineingeschaut hatte in die Geistigkeit des Makrokosmos. Denn denken Sie nur einmal, was diese Zarathustra-Individualität durchgemacht hatte! Einstmals, da sie zuerst bei Begründung der urpersischen Kultur wirkte im Hinaufblicken nach dem großen Sonnengeist, da schon ging der Blick des Zarathustra in die Weltenweiten des Geistigen. Und immer weiter und weiter entwickelte sich durch die folgenden Inkarnationen gerade diese Individualität. — Wenn das Innerste der Menschennatur mit den intensivsten Kräften der Liebe und des Mitleids dadurch zustande gekommen war, daß eine reine Menschensubstanz bewahrt geblieben war bis zur Geburt des nathanischen Jesus, und dann der Astralleib sich noch durchdrungen hatte mit den Kräften des Gotama Buddha, wenn also in dem nathanischen Jesus das vorhanden war, was wir «iinnerlichste Innerlichkeit» des Menschen nennen können, so verband sich mit dieser Leiblichkeit im zwölften Jahre jene menschliche Individualität, die unter allen menschlichen Individualitäten am klarsten, am tiefsten hineingeschaut hatte in die Geistigkeit des Makrokosmos. Dadurch aber wurden die Werkzeuge des nathanischen Jesus so umgestaltet, daß sie in der Tat als Werkzeuge jetzt fähig waren, den Extrakt, den Christus-Extrakt des Makrokosmos, in sich aufzunehmen. Hätte nicht die Individualität des Zarathustra bis zum dreißigsten Jahre diese Leiblichkeit durchdrungen, so wären ihre Augen nicht fähig gewesen, zu ertragen die Substanz des Christus vom dreißigsten Jahre bis zum Mysterium von Golgatha, wären die Hände nicht fähig gewesen sich zu durchdringen mit der Substanz des Christus im dreißigsten Jahre. Um den Christus aufnehmen zu können, mußte diese Leiblichkeit eben gleichsam vorbereitet, ausgeweiter werden durch die Individualität des Zarathustra. So haben wir allerdings in dem Jesus von Nazareth, wie er in dem Moment war, da Zarathustra von ihm Abschied nahm und die ChristusIndividualität in ihn hineinging, weder einen Adepten noch sonst irgend etwas von einem höheren Menschen vor uns. Denn ein Adept ist dadurch Adept, daß er eine hochentwickelte Individualität hat; die ist aber gerade aus der dreifachen Leiblichkeit des Jesus von Nazareth herausgegangen. Wir haben nur die dreifache Leiblichkeit durch die Anwesenheit des Zarathustra so präpariert, daß sie aufnehmen konnte die Christus-Individualität. Aber nun war durch die Verbindung der Christus-Individualität mit diesem Leibe, den wir eben beschrieben haben, das Folgende nötig geworden.

Durch die drei Jahre, von der Johannes-Taufe im Jordan an bis zum eigentlichen Mysterium von Golgatha, war die leibliche Entwickelung des physischen Leibes, des Ätherleibes und des Astralleibes eine ganz andere, als die leibliche Entwickelung bei andern Menschen. Dadurch, daß auf den nathanischen Jesus in früheren Inkarnationen luziferische und ahrimanische Kräfte nicht Einfluß genommen hatten, war die Möglichkeit gegeben, daß von der Johannes-Taufe im Jordan ab — da jetzt nicht eine menschliche Ich-Individualttät in diesem Jesus von Nazareth war, sondern die Christus-Individualität — alles das nicht herausgebildet wurde, was sonst beim Menschen in seiner Leiblichkeit immer wirken muß. Wir haben gestern davon gesprochen, daß das, was wir das menschliche Phantom nennen, die eigentliche Urgestalt, die in sich auffaßt, einsaugt die materiellen Elemente und sie dann mit dem Tode abgibt — daß dieses Phantom degenerierte im Laufe der menschlichen Entwickelung bis zum Mysterium von Golgatha. Wir können diese Degenerierung in einer gewissen Weise so auffassen, daß eigentlich vom Anfange der menschlichen Entwickelung an dieses Phantom dazu bestimmt war, unberührt zu bleiben von den materiellen Teilen, die aus dem Mineral-, Pflanzen- oder Tierreich vom Menschen als Nahrungsmittel aufgenommen werden. Unberührt davon sollte das Phantom bleiben. Es war aber nicht unberührt geblieben. Denn durch den luziferischen Einfluß trat eine enge Verbindung ein zwischen dem Phantom und den Kräften, die der Mensch aufnimmt durch die irdische Entwickelung — besonders mit den Aschenbestandteilen. Das war also die Folge des luziferischen Einflusses, daß das Phantom, während es mit der weiteren Entwickelung der Menschheit mitgeht, eine starke Anziehung zu den Aschenbestandteilen entwickelte; und dadurch, anstatt mit dem Ätherleib des Menschen mitzugehen, ging es nun mit dem mit, was Zerfallprodukte sind. Das waren alles die Folgen der luziferischen Einflüsse. Und wo die luziferischen Einflüsse so hintan gehalten waren, wie dies beim nathanischen Jesus der Fall war, wo ja kein menschliches Ich da war, sondern wo die kosmische Christus-Wesenheit von der Johannes-Taufe an vorhanden war, da zeigte es sich, das sich keinerlei Anziehungskräfte geltend machten zwischen dem menschlichen Phantom und dem, was als materielle Teile aufgenommen wurde. Es blieb das Phantom durch alle drei Jahre unberührt von den materiellen Teilen. Man drückt das okkult so aus, daß man sagt: Eigentlich sollte das menschliche Phantom nach dem, wie es sich herübergebildet hatte durch die Saturn-, Sonnen- und Mondenzeit, keine Anziehungskräfte haben zu den Aschenbestandteilen, sondern es sollte nur mit den sich lösenden Salzbestandteilen eine Anziehung haben, so daß es den Weg der Verflüchtigung nimmt in dem Maße, als die Salzbestandteile sich auflösen. Im okkulten Sinne würde man sagen, daß es sich auflöst und übergeht — nicht in die Erde, sondern in die flüchtigen Bestandteile. Das war aber gerade das Eigentliche, daß mit der Johannes-Taufe im Jordan, der Versetzung der Christus-Individualität in den Leib des nathanischen Jesus, aller Zusammenhang des Phantoms mit den Aschenbestandteilen vernichtet, vertilgt worden war und der einzige Zusammenhang blieb mit den Salzbestandteilen. Das tritt uns auch da hervor, wo der Christus Jesus denjenigen, die er zunächst erwählt hatte, klarmachen will: Es soll durch die Art, wie ihr euch verbunden fühlt mit der ChristusWesenheit, zur weiteren menschlichen Entwickelung die Möglichkeit herbeigeführt werden, daß der eine aus dem Grabe auferstandene Leib — der Geistleib — auf die Menschen übergehen kann. — Dies will der Christus sagen, als er die Worte gebraucht: «Ihr seid das Salz der Erde!» Alle diese Worte, an die wieder erinnern die Terminologie, die Kunstausdrücke der späteren Alchimisten, des späteren Okkultismus, alle diese Worte, die wir in den Evangelien finden, haben die denkbar tiefste Bedeutung. Und es war in der Tat diese Bedeutung gerade den mittelalterlichen und auch den nachmittelalterlichen wirklichen Alchimisten — nicht den Scharlatanen, von denen die Literatur erzählt — voll bekannt, und keiner sprach diese Zusammenhänge aus, ohne daß er im Herzen fühlte den Zusammenhang mit dem Christus.

So stellte sich denn heraus: Als der Christus Jesus gekreuzigt wurde, sein Leib an das Kreuz genagelt wurde — Sie merken, daß ich genau mit den Worten des Evangeliums hier spreche, aus dem einfachen Grunde, weil die wirklichen okkulten Forschungen tatsächlich hier die Worte des Evangeliums absolut bestätigen —, als dieser Leib des Jesus von Nazareth ans Kreuz geschlagen wurde, da war in der Tat das Phantom völlig intakt, bestand als die geistleibliche, aber nur übersinnlich sichtbare Form und war in einem viel loseren Zusammenhange mit dem materiellen Inhalt aus den Erdenelementen als bei irgendeinem Menschen. Aus dem einfachen Grunde, weil bei jedem andern Menschen eine Verbindung des Phantoms mit den Elementen eingetreten ist, die diese Elemente zusammenhält. Bei dem Christus Jesus war es in der Tat ganz anders. Es war so, wie, ich möchte sagen, nach dem Gesetz des Beharrungsvermögens gewisse materielle Teile noch zusammenhalten in der Form, die man ihnen gegeben hat und dann nach einiger Zeit zerfallen, so daß kaum von ihnen etwas sichtbar ist. So war es mit den materiellen Teilen des Leibes des Christus Jesus. Als er vom Kreuze herabgenommen wurde, waren sozusagen die Teile noch zusammenhaltend, aber sie waren in keiner Verbindung mit dem Phantom, weil das Phantom von ihnen völlig frei war. Als der Leib dann mit gewissen Substanzen versetzt wurde, die dann wieder auf diesen Leib ganz anders wirkten als auf einen andern Leib, der einbalsamiert wird, da geschah es, daß sich die materiellen Stoffe nach dem Begräbnis rasch verflüchtigten, rasch in die Elemente übergingen. Daher fanden die Jünger, die nachschauten, die Tücher, mit denen er zugedeckt war, — das Phantom aber, woran die Entwickelung des Ich hängt, das war aus dem Grabe auferstanden. Daß Maria von Magdala, die das frühere, von den Elementen der Erde durchsetzte Phantom nur kannte, in dem von aller Erdenschwere befreiten Phantom, das sie jetzt hellseherisch sah, nicht wiedererkennen konnte dieselbe Gestalt, das ist nicht zu verwundern. Sie kam ihr anders vor. Insbesondere müssen wir uns darüber klar sein, daß nur durch die Kraft des Beisammenseins der Jünger mit dem Christus alle Jünger und alle Menschen, von denen uns das erzählt wird, den Auferstandenen sehen konnten; denn er erschien im Geistleib, in dem Leibe, von dem Paulus sagt, daß er sich wie das Samenkorn vermehrt und übergeht in alle Menschen. Daß aber auch Paulus selbst überzeugt ist davon, daß nicht der von den irdischen Elementen durchsetzte Leib den andern Jüngern erschienen ist, sondern daß dasselbe, was ihm erschienen war, auch den andern Jüngern erschienen war, das sagt er an der Stelle:

«Ich habe es euch überliefert in erster Linie,. wie ich es selbst überkommen habe: daß Christus gestorben ist um unserer Sünden willen, so daß die Schriften sich erfüllen mußten, und daß er begraben wurde, und daß er auferweckt wurde am dritten Tage, gemäß dem, was in den Schriften immerdar gestanden hat, und daß er erschienen ist dem Kephas [Simon Petrus], dann den Zwölf. Hernach erschien er mehr als fünfhundert Brüdern auf einmal, von welchen die meisten noch leben, etliche aber sind entschlafen. Hernach erschien er dem Jakobus, dann den sämtlichen Aposteln; zuletzt aber gleich allen als dem zu früh Geborenen erschien er auch mir.» (1. Korinther 15, 3—8.)

Dem Paulus erschien der Christus durch das Ereignis von Damaskus. Und daß die Art, durch die er ihm erschien, gleichgestellt ist mit den Erscheinungen gegenüber den andern Jüngern, das bezeugt, daß der Christus dem Paulus in derselben Gestalt erschienen ist, wie den andern. Was aber war es, was Paulus überzeugte?

Paulus war in einem gewissen Sinne schon ein Eingeweihter vor dem Ereignis von Damaskus. Aber es war eine Einweihung, die zusammengesetzt war aus dem althebräischen und dem griechischen Prinzip. Ein Eingeweihter war er, der bis dahin nur wußte, daß die, welche sich mit der geistigen Welt durch die Initiation verbunden haben, in ihrem Actherleib unabhängig geworden sind von dem physischen Leib und in einer gewissen Weise denen, die dazu fähig sind, erscheinen können in ihrer reinsten Gestalt des Ätherleibes. Würde Paulus nur die Erscheinung eines reinen, von dem physischen Leibe unabhängigen Ätherleibes gehabt haben, so würde er anders gesprochen haben. Er würde gesagt haben, er hätte geschaut einen, der eingeweiht worden war und unabhängig von dem physischen Leibe mit der Erdentwickelung weiterlebt. Das würde für ihn auch nichts besonders Überraschendes gehabt haben. Das konnte es also nicht sein, was er vor Damaskus erlebt hat. Was er erlebt hat, war das, wovon er wußte, man kann es erst erleben, wenn die Schriften erfüllt sind: daß einmal in der geistigen Atmosphäre der Erde ein vollständiges menschliches Phantom, ein aus dem Grabe erstandener menschlicher Leib als übersinnliche Gestalt da sein werde. Das aber hatte er gesehen! Das war es, was ihm vor Damaskus erschien und ihn überzeugte: Er war da! Er ist auferstanden! Denn es ist das da, was nur von ihm kommen kann: es ist das Phantom da, was gesehen werden kann von allen menschlichen Individualitäten, die einen Zusammenhang suchen mit dem Christus! — Das war es, was ihn überzeugen konnte, daß der Christus schon da war, daß er nicht erst kommen werde, daß er wirklich in einem physischen Leibe war, und daß dieser physische Leib die eigentliche Urform des physischen Leibes herausgerettet hat zum Heile aller Menschen.

Daß diese Tat nur geschehen konnte durch die größte Entfaltung der göttlichen Liebe, und in welchem Sinne diese Tat eine Liebestat war, und in welchem Sinne dann das Wort «Erlösung» zu nehmen ist in der weiteren Entwickelung der Menschheit — davon wollen wir morgen sprechen.

Eighth Lecture

Yesterday it was indicated that it is now important to answer the question: What actually happened to the being we call Christ Jesus, from his baptism by John in the Jordan to the mystery of Golgotha? In order to answer this question as far as possible, we will briefly recall what we know from previous lectures about the life of Jesus of Nazareth, who became the Christ bearer in his thirtieth year. The essentials are also indicated in a few words in my recently published book on “The Spiritual Guidance of Man and Humanity.”

We know that in Palestine, at the time that matters, not one but two boys named Jesus were born, one of whom was born of the Solomonic line of the House of David. This is essentially the Jesus child of whom the Gospel of Matthew tells us. The peculiar contradiction at the beginning of the Gospels of Matthew and Luke stems precisely from the fact that the information provided by the writer of the Gospel of Matthew refers to the one Jesus boy, the one from the Solomonic line of the House of David. Then, not quite, but at about the same time, another Jesus boy was born from the Nathanic line of the House of David. The important thing now is to understand what kind of beings these were. Occult research shows that the individuality that was in the Solomon line of the baby Jesus is none other than that of Zarathustra. After his main mission, which we have discussed in relation to the original Persian culture, Zarathustra was incarnated again and again, most recently within the Babylonian-Chaldean culture, and then as this Solomon-line Jesus boy. It was necessary for this Zarathustra individuality to first incarnate in a body that came from the Solomon line of the House of David, which was suited to process the great abilities of Zarathustra and carry them forward in the way that was appropriate for the time. in a body that came from the Solomonic line of the House of David and was suited to processing the great abilities of Zarathustra and developing them in the way that human abilities can be developed when they are already at a very high level, insofar as they belong to the essence that passes from incarnation to incarnation. It is therefore a human body that is now able to process these abilities not only at a later age, but in a youthful, childlike, vigorous organization. We therefore see the Zarathustra individuality growing up in such a way that the boy's abilities develop relatively early. This boy even showed certain knowledge at an early age that would otherwise be impossible at such a young age. But we must note that this Solomonic boy Jesus, despite being the embodiment of such a high individuality, was nevertheless a highly developed human being, which means that, in the same way as even the most highly developed human being, he was endowed with certain capacities for error, with certain capacities for moral difficulties, even if not exactly for vices or sins. Then we know that the individuality of Zarathustra, in the sense of an occult process familiar to anyone who has familiarized themselves with such facts, left the body of the Solomon boy Jesus in the twelfth year and passed over into the body of the Nathan boy Jesus. Now, the body of this Nathanic Jesus boy, or rather, the threefold physical body: the physical body, the etheric body, and the astral body of this boy, was of a very special nature. For this body was in fact such that the boy who had it showed precisely the opposite abilities to the Solomon Jesus boy. While the latter stood out for his great talent in relation to external things that can be learned externally, the Nathanic Jesus child could be called, in relation to external things, one might almost say — you will understand that this cannot be said in the slightest way disparagingly — untalented. He was unable to find his way into the things that human culture has created on earth. On the other hand, it is remarkable that he was able to speak from birth. So what is more physical showed itself as an ability already present from birth. It is a completely accurate tradition that he spoke, albeit in a language incomprehensible to all other humans. But what was inherent in this language from birth is recounted — and this is a reliable tradition that can also be confirmed occultly — that the mother could understand what this boy was saying. It is so that precisely those qualities that we can call heart qualities were pronounced in this boy; an immense capacity for love and an immensely devoted nature distinguished this boy. And the remarkable thing was that from the first day of his life, he exerted beneficial effects through his mere presence or even through his touch, effects that today we might call magnetic effects. So all the qualities of the heart — and the qualities of the heart so heightened that they could become a magnetic blessing for those around him — were evident in this boy.

We also know that the forces that had once been acquired by the Bodhisattva who later became Gotama Buddha were at work in the astral body of this boy. We know — and in this respect the Eastern tradition is absolutely correct, for it can be verified by secret science — that the Bodhisattva, who half a millennium before our era, with the advent of the Buddha, had lost the need to incarnate further in physical bodies on earth, from then on worked primarily on all those who devoted themselves to his teachings, but now only from the spiritual world. This is the peculiarity of such an individuality that ascends to the height where it is no longer incarnated in a physical body, that it can then participate in the affairs and destinies of our earthly existence from the spiritual worlds. This can happen in the most varied ways. In fact, the Bodhisattva, who had his last incarnation on earth as Gotama Buddha, essentially participated in the further development of humanity. For let us be clear that our human spiritual world is constantly connected with the entire rest of the spiritual world. Let us be clear that human beings do not just eat and drink and thereby take in the substances of the physical earth, but that they continually receive spiritual nourishment from the spiritual world, that forces flow into physical, earthly existence in the most diverse ways from the spiritual worlds. Such an inflow of the forces that Buddha had acquired into the wider stream of humanity took place through the Buddha forces permeating the astral body of the Nathanic Jesus child, so that what the Buddha had to give to humanity in his former form was active in the astral body of this child. We also know from earlier lectures that the words we still have today as the Christmas saying: “Revelation can be seen from the heights of the worlds, and peace will spread on earth in the hearts of those who are of good will!” originate from what flowed down into human evolution through the Buddha forces immersing themselves in the astral body of the Nathanic Jesus child. Thus we see the Buddha forces continuing to work in the stream of earthly existence that began with the events in Palestine. These Buddha forces have continued to work. And it is very interesting that recent occult research in Western occultism in the last few years has led to the recognition that there is a very important connection between European culture and the Buddha forces. For a long time now, these Buddha forces have been working from the spiritual worlds, especially on everything that is unthinkable in Western culture without the specific Christian influence. Thus, all the worldview currents that we have seen develop in the last centuries up to the nineteenth century are, insofar as they are Western spiritual currents, all permeated by the Christ impulse, but the Buddha has always been working from the spiritual world. We can therefore say that the most important thing that European humanity can receive from the Buddha today does not come from the tradition of what the Buddha gave to humanity half a millennium before the Christian era, but from what he has become since then. For he did not remain static, but progressed; and it is precisely through this progress as a spiritual being in the spiritual worlds that he has been able to participate in the most eminent sense in the further development of Western culture. It is a result of our occult research that much of what we encountered before this important influence was thoroughly investigated corresponds in a wonderful way with this result. For we know that the same individuality that appeared as Gotama Buddha in the East had already been active in the West, and that certain legends and traditions associated with the names Bodha or Wotan have to do with the same individuality as Buddhism has with Gotama Buddha in the East; so that in a certain sense the same stage has been taken up again, which had already been prepared earlier by the same individuality in relation to the development of humanity. So intricate are the paths taken by the spiritual currents within the development of humanity.

Today, it is most important for us that the Buddha forces are active in the astral body of the boy Jesus Luke. When this boy Jesus is twelve years old, the Zarathustra individuality passes into the threefold body of this Nathanic boy Jesus. Where did this boy Jesus get the remarkable qualities we have just described? It came from the fact that this Jesus boy was not a human individuality like any other. This individuality was in a certain way completely different, and in order to understand it, we must go back to the ancient Lemurian time, when the earthly development of human beings really began. We must be clear that everything that preceded the Lemurian era was actually only a repetition of the Saturn, Sun, and Moon existences, and that it was only then that the first seed — as a possibility — was planted in human beings so that they could take on the fourth member of their being in Earth's development: the I. If we take the entire flow of human development, we must say: Humanity, as it spread across the Earth — you have described this spread in more detail in “An Outline of Secret Science” — can be traced back in the Lemurian period to certain human ancestors of this early period of our present Earth. And we must fix a point in time in the Lemurian period after which we can properly speak of the human race in the modern sense. What came before cannot yet be discussed in such a way that we could say that those I's were already present in human beings on Earth, which then incarnated further and further. That was not the case. Before that, the human I was by no means separated from the substance of the hierarchy that initially gave rise to this human I, from the hierarchy of the spirits of form. We can now imagine — as occult research shows — that a part of the substance of the spirits of form entered into human incarnations for the formation of the human ego. But when human beings were handed over to their fleshly incarnations on earth, something was retained from what was to become human. A substance of the I was retained, as it were, which was not led into the stream of physical incarnations. If we wanted to imagine this stream of human incarnations, which begins with what the Bible calls the progenitor of the human race, Adam, we would have to draw a widely ramified family tree. But we can simply imagine that what has flowed down from the spirits of form now flows on; only something has been held back, as it were, an I that has now been preserved from entering into the fleshly incarnations — an I that did not always reappear as a human being, but retained the form, the substantiality that human beings had before they advanced to their first incarnation on earth. Thus, an I that lived on alongside the rest of humanity and, until the time we are now speaking of, when the events in Palestine were to take place, had never been embodied in a human physical body, an I that was still in the same situation as — if we wanted to speak biblically — the I of Adam before his first earthly incarnation in the flesh. Such an ego always existed.

If we now touch upon the occult knowledge about this ego, which is of course something incredibly 'foolish' for modern human beings, we see that this ego, which was held back in reserve, so to speak, was not directed into a human body, but was actually only handed over to the sacred mysteries as they existed throughout the Atlantean and post-Atlantean times. It was kept in an important mystery center, as if in a tabernacle. This I therefore had very special characteristics; it had the characteristic of being untouched by anything that a human I could ever have learned on Earth. It was therefore also untouched by all Luciferic and Ahrimanic influences; it was something we can imagine as a kind of empty sphere in comparison to the other I's of human beings, something that was completely virgin in relation to all earthly experiences, a nothingness, a negative in relation to all earthly experiences. Therefore, it appeared as if the Nathanic Jesus boy described in the Gospel of Luke had no human ego at all, as if he consisted only of a physical body, an etheric body, and an astral body. And it is sufficient to say for now that an ego as developed as it had become during the Atlantean and post-Atlantean periods was completely absent in the Jesus boy of Luke's Gospel. We are speaking in the true sense of the word when we say: in the case of the Jesus boy in Matthew, we are dealing with a fully developed human being; in the case of the Nathanic Jesus boy in Luke's Gospel, we are dealing with a physical body, etheric body, and astral body that are arranged in such a way that they harmoniously represent the human being as he came over as a result of the Saturn, Sun, and Moon evolutions. Therefore, as the Akashic Records teach us, this Jesus boy was untalented in everything that human culture had developed; he could not absorb it because he had never been there. We demonstrate what the external skills and abilities of existence are because we were already present in previous incarnations when certain tasks were performed; someone who was never present shows himself to be unskilled in everything that human beings have achieved during the development of the Earth. If the Nathanic Jesus boy had been born in our time, he would have shown himself to be extremely unskilled in learning to write, because people did not write in Adam's time, and certainly not before that. So, for everything that was acquired in the course of human development, the Luke Jesus boy showed himself to be extremely unskilled. On the other hand, the inner qualities he had brought with him, which had otherwise only come into decadence through the Luciferic influences, showed themselves to a high degree. And the fact that this Jesus boy spoke a strange language is something even more interesting. For here we must look at something I have also mentioned in my book on “The Spiritual Guidance of Men and Humanity”: that the languages that are spread across the earth today, which occur among the various tribes, arose relatively late in human development; but they were preceded by what could truly be called a human proto-language. And it is the dividing spirits of the Luciferic and Ahrimanic worlds that have made the many languages of the world out of the original language. The original language has been lost and cannot be spoken today by any human being with an ego that has passed from incarnation to incarnation in the course of Earth's development. The boy Jesus, who had not passed through human incarnations, was given the ability from the starting point of human evolution to speak not this or that language, but a language which, with a certain right, can be said to have been incomprehensible to those around him, but which was understood by the mother's heart because of what lived within it in heartfelt sincerity. This points to an enormously significant phenomenon in this Luke-Jesus child.

When this Luke-Jesus child was born, he was thus endowed with everything that was uninfluenced by the Luciferic-Ahrimanic forces. He did not have such an ego that had incarnated again and again; therefore, nothing needed to be cast out in his twelfth year, when the individuality of Zarathustra passed from the Solomonic Jesus boy of the Gospel of Matthew into the Nathanic Jesus boy. I said earlier that this part of humanity that had remained behind and developed alongside the rest of humanity in the mysteries had actually been born for the first time in the Palestinian period as the Nathanic Jesus boy. It was a transition from a Near Eastern mystery, where this human germ had been preserved, into the body of the Nathanic Jesus boy. Now this boy grew up, and in his twelfth year the individuality of Zarathustra came over him. We also know that this transition is hinted at in the scene of the twelve-year-old Jesus in the temple. It is understandable that the parents of the Nathanic Jesus boy, who were accustomed to viewing this child as we have just described, must have found a strange change when they found the boy in the temple after having lost him. For that was the moment when the individuality of Zarathustra passed into the twelve-year-old boy, so that we now have the individuality of Zarathustra in the Luke Jesus boy from the age of twelve to thirty.

Now we have a remarkable statement in the Gospel of Luke that points to something that can only be understood through occult research. You know that in the Gospel of Luke, after the scene with the twelve-year-old Jesus in the temple has been described, there is a passage: “And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man” (Luke 2:52). This is how it reads in Weizsäcker's translation. Luther translates it as: “And Jesus grew in wisdom, age, and grace with God and men.” This does not make much sense either. For if it says “Jesus grew in age,” I would like to know what it means for a twelve-year-old boy to grow in age. All that is needed for that is for time to pass! In truth, however, if we reconstruct the text of the Gospels from the Akashic Records, it says here that he grew in all that an astral body can grow in, namely in wisdom; that he grew in all that an etheric body can grow in, namely in all the qualities of goodness, benevolence, and so on; and then increased in everything that a physical body can increase in, which pours into the outer form. This is meant to indicate in particular that this child Jesus, through the peculiarity he possessed until the age of twelve, remained untouched, his individuality could not be touched by the Luciferic and Ahrimanic forces, because it was not an individuality that had passed from incarnation to incarnation. The Gospel of Luke indicates this very particularly by tracing the line of generations back through Adam to God, in order to say that it was the substance that was unaffected by everything that had gone through human development.

So this boy Jesus grew up, increasingly imbued with all that is possible in the development of a threefold physical body that could not be touched by what touches other threefold physical bodies of human beings. And the Zarathustra individuality now had the opportunity to connect all the heights it had reached up to that point with all the wonderful things that were in such a threefold physical body, because it was not disturbed by anything, but could develop everything that only an ideal physical body, an ideal etheric body, an ideal astral body can develop in the outer world. This is indicated by the sentence from the Gospel of Luke that has just been quoted. This made it possible that, by the age of thirty, something had happened in the development of this young man that we can say: at the age of thirty, this individuality of Zarathustra was able to pour everything that can come from such a high individuality into this threefold human physicality. Thus, by the age of thirty, we can form a correct picture of Jesus of Nazareth if we imagine him as a high human individuality; precisely as an individuality whose coming into being was made possible by the greatest possible measures, as we have seen.

But now we must be clear about one thing if we want to agree that the fruits of a development that we undergo in our bodies benefit individuality. Our bodies give us the opportunity to draw the fruits for our further development out of life, as it were. When we leave our bodies in death—now in the death of an ordinary human being—we do not initially leave behind what we have acquired and worked for in them as individuality. We will see later under what special circumstances something can remain in the bodies; but it is not the rule, the law, that individuality leaves behind what it has acquired. Thus, when Zarathustra leaves the threefold body of Jesus of Nazareth at the age of thirty, he leaves behind the three bodies: the physical body, the etheric body, and the astral body. But everything that Zarathustra was able to gain as individuality through these instruments goes into the individuality of Zarathustra and lives on with this individuality, which now emerges from the threefold physicality. This benefits this individuality. On the other hand, one thing was achieved in the threefold physical body of Jesus of Nazareth: namely, that human nature, as it was before the Luciferic and Ahrimanic influences, was connected with the individuality that had looked most meaningfully into the spirituality of the macrocosm. Just think what this Zarathustra individuality had gone through! Once, when it first worked in the founding of the ancient Persian culture, looking up to the great Sun Spirit, Zarathustra's gaze already went into the world-wide expanse of the spiritual. And through the following incarnations, this individuality developed further and further. — When the innermost essence of human nature had come into being with the most intense forces of love and compassion through the preservation of a pure human substance until the birth of the Nathanic Jesus, and then the astral body had become permeated with the forces of Gotama Buddha, when, in other words, what we can call the “innermost innermost” of human beings, then in the twelfth year that human individuality, which had looked most clearly and deeply into the spirituality of the macrocosm of all human individualities, was connected with this physicality. But this transformed the instruments of the Nathanic Jesus in such a way that they were now indeed capable, as instruments, of taking in the extract, the Christ extract of the macrocosm. If the individuality of Zarathustra had not permeated this physicality by the age of thirty, his eyes would not have been able to bear the substance of Christ from the age of thirty to the mystery of Golgotha, and his hands would not have been able to permeate themselves with the substance of Christ at the age of thirty. In order to be able to take in Christ, this physicality had to be prepared, expanded, as it were, by the individuality of Zarathustra. Thus, in Jesus of Nazareth, as he was at the moment when Zarathustra took leave of him and the Christ individuality entered into him, we have neither an adept nor anything else of a higher human being before us. For an adept is an adept because he has a highly developed individuality; but this had just left the threefold physical body of Jesus of Nazareth. We have only prepared the threefold physicality through the presence of Zarathustra so that it could take in the Christ individuality. But now, through the connection of the Christ individuality with this body that we have just described, the following became necessary.

During the three years from the baptism of John in the Jordan to the actual mystery of Golgotha, the physical development of the physical body, the etheric body, and the astral body was completely different from the physical development of other human beings. Because Luciferic and Ahrimanic forces had not influenced the Nathanic Jesus in earlier incarnations, it was possible that from the baptism of John in the Jordan onwards — since there was now no human ego individuality in this Jesus of Nazareth, but the Christ individuality — everything that must otherwise always be active in the physical body of a human being did not develop. Yesterday we spoke of how what we call the human phantom, the actual archetype that takes in and absorbs the material elements and then releases them at death, degenerated in the course of human evolution until the Mystery of Golgotha. We can understand this degeneration in a certain way, namely that from the beginning of human development this phantom was actually destined to remain untouched by the material parts that humans take in as food from the mineral, plant, and animal kingdoms. The phantom was supposed to remain untouched by these. But it did not remain untouched. For through the influence of Lucifer, a close connection arose between the phantom and the forces that human beings take in through earthly development — especially with the ash components. So it was the consequence of the Luciferic influence that the phantom, while accompanying the further development of humanity, developed a strong attraction to the ash components; and thus, instead of accompanying the etheric body of the human being, it now accompanied what are decay products. These were all consequences of the Luciferic influences. And where the Luciferic influences were held back, as was the case with the Nathanic Jesus, where there was no human ego, but where the cosmic Christ being was present from the baptism of John, it became apparent that no forces of attraction were at work between the human phantom and what was taken in as material parts. The phantom remained untouched by the material parts throughout the three years. In occult terms, this is expressed as follows: after forming through the Saturn, Sun, and Moon periods, the human phantom should not have any attractive forces toward the ash components, but should only be attracted to the dissolving salt components, so that it takes the path of evaporation to the extent that the salt components dissolve. In the occult sense, one would say that it dissolves and passes over—not into the earth, but into the volatile components. But this was precisely the point: with the baptism of John in the Jordan, the transfer of the Christ individuality into the body of the Nathanic Jesus, all connection between the phantom and the ash components was destroyed, annihilated, and the only connection that remained was with the salt components. This also becomes clear to us when Christ Jesus wants to make it clear to those he had initially chosen: Through the way in which you feel connected to the Christ Being, the possibility should be brought about for further human development, so that the body that rose from the grave — the spiritual body — can pass over to human beings. This is what Christ means when he uses the words: “You are the salt of the earth!” All these words, which are recalled in the terminology and artistic expressions of later alchemists and later occultism, all these words that we find in the Gospels, have the deepest possible meaning. And it was indeed this meaning that was fully known to the real alchemists of the Middle Ages and also of the post-Medieval period — not to the charlatans of whom literature tells — and no one spoke of these connections without feeling in his heart the connection with Christ.

So it turned out that when Christ Jesus was crucified, his body was nailed to the cross — you will notice that I am speaking here exactly in the words of the Gospel, for the simple reason that real occult research actually confirms the words of the Gospel here — when this body of Jesus of Nazareth was nailed to the cross, the phantom was in fact completely intact, existing as a spiritual body, but only visible to the supersensible senses, and was in a much looser connection with the material content from the earthly elements than in any human being. For the simple reason that in every other human being, a connection has been established between the phantom and the elements that hold these elements together. With Christ Jesus, it was indeed quite different. It was as if, according to the law of inertia, certain material parts still held together in the form that had been given to them and then, after some time, disintegrated so that hardly anything was visible of them. This was the case with the material parts of the body of Christ Jesus. When he was taken down from the cross, the parts were still holding together, so to speak, but they were not connected to the phantom, because the phantom was completely free of them. When the body was then mixed with certain substances, which then acted on this body in a completely different way than on another body that is embalmed, it happened that the material substances quickly evaporated after the burial, quickly passing into the elements. Therefore, the disciples who looked after found the cloths with which he was covered, but the phantom, on which the development of the I depends, had risen from the grave. It is not surprising that Mary Magdalene, who had only known the earlier phantom, permeated by the elements of the earth, could not recognize the same figure in the phantom she now saw clairvoyantly, freed from all earthly heaviness. She appeared different to her. In particular, we must be clear that it was only through the power of the disciples' being together with Christ that all the disciples and all the people of whom we are told could see the risen one; for he appeared in the spirit body, in the body of which Paul says that it multiplies like a seed and passes into all people. But Paul himself is also convinced that it was not the body permeated by earthly elements that appeared to the other disciples, but that the same thing that appeared to him also appeared to the other disciples, as he says in the following passage:

"I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, that Christ died for our sins, that the Scriptures might be fulfilled, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, and that He appeared to Cephas [Simon Peter], then to the Twelve. After that, he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at once, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. After that, he appeared to James, then to all the apostles; last of all, he appeared to me also, as to one born too soon.” (1 Corinthians 15:3-8)

Christ appeared to Paul through the event at Damascus. And the fact that the manner in which he appeared to him is equivalent to the appearances to the other disciples testifies that Christ appeared to Paul in the same form as to the others. But what was it that convinced Paul?

Paul was, in a certain sense, already an initiate before the event at Damascus. But it was an initiation that was composed of the ancient Hebrew and Greek principles. He was an initiate who knew only that those who had connected themselves with the spiritual world through initiation had become independent of the physical body in their etheric body and could, in a certain way, appear to those who were capable of seeing them in their purest form as etheric bodies. If Paul had only experienced the appearance of a pure etheric body independent of the physical body, he would have spoken differently. He would have said that he had seen someone who had been initiated and who continued to live independently of the physical body with the earth's evolution. That would not have been particularly surprising to him. So that could not have been what he experienced before Damascus. What he experienced was what he knew could only be experienced once the scriptures had been fulfilled: that one day, in the spiritual atmosphere of the earth, a complete human phantom, a human body risen from the grave, would appear as a supersensible form. But that was what he had seen! That was what appeared to him before Damascus and convinced him: He was there! He had risen! For it is there, and it can only come from him: the phantom is there, visible to all human individuals who seek a connection with Christ! That was what convinced him that Christ was already there, that he would not come first, that he was really in a physical body, and that this physical body had rescued the actual archetype of the physical body for the salvation of all human beings.

That this deed could only have been accomplished through the greatest unfolding of divine love, and in what sense this deed was an act of love, and in what sense the word “redemption” is to be understood in the further development of humanity — that is what we will discuss tomorrow.