A Sound Outlook for To-day and a Genuine Hope for the Future
GA 181
25 June 1918, Berlin
I. States of Consciousness
Today I should like to look back, drawing together and amplifying what has been said here in the past. In this way I want to lay a foundation for: carrying certain essential themes to a conclusion in the present lectures.
In spiritual-scientific inquiries we encounter besides the two forms of consciousness known to everybody—dreaming and ordinary day-time life from waking to sleeping—a third form, best described perhaps as “higher perceptive consciousness”. Dream-consciousness we reckon in ordinary life as merely a sort of interruption of ordinary consciousness, but that is because we recall only a small part of our dreams. We are really dreaming all the time from falling asleep to waking, and what we commonly describe as the content of our dream-consciousness is merely such fragments of dreaming experience as we are able to remember when we are awake. From the standpoint of Spiritual Science, therefore we must say: We know three stages or kinds of consciousness; that of dreams, that of waking life, and the consciousness in which the spiritual world is open to higher perception.
You will have no difficulty in recognising that each type of consciousness has a certain quality in common with the one next above it in rank. For instance, dream-consciousness gives us pictures—we know that our dream-experiences are pictures. When you recall them you are unable to fit then into the sequence of Cause and Effect in daily life. To try to do that would mean confusing dream life and day-life, and you would become visionaries. Dream-experiences consist of pictures in contrast to realities, by which we mean the events experienced in waking life.
If we now compare our ordinary waking-experiences with those of the higher perceptive consciousness, we find an exactly similar relationship. Here, compared with what is experienced by this higher consciousness as spiritual, super-sensible reality, the experiences of the day-time from waking to falling asleep, are pictures. Therefore, to the degree in which the awakened, higher perceptive consciousness is experienced, it is possible to say (this must be done with prudence): “I experience in this consciousness a genuine reality, compared with which ordinary so-called reality is only a set of pictures”.
Put in this abstract way, the statement has little value. Of course, many people are quite content with these abstract phrases, believing that thereby the riddles of the world can be solved. This is not so. Such a statement has value only when it is applied directly to the actual practice of life. Hence it has to be made relevant to certain definite realms of experience.
There is a realm to which I have already drawn attention from time to time, one which we needs must contemplate if we would make progress in Spiritual Science. It lies nearest to us, yet it is often quite beyond our ken—the realm of man himself. The common opinion is that though we are ignorant of the super-sensible man, we do know the physical man, but this is true only up to a certain point. Anatomy and physiology, as usually understood, are woven out of countless illusions. To-day let us start, if only apparently, from the outer form of man as a physical being and proceed on the lines of the threefold division of his organism to which I have often referred.
If he is viewed in relation to the super-sensible world, and thus as a picture—not as the reality which ordinary anatomy and physiology take him to be—he falls into three markedly different divisions, even as regards his outer physical form: the man of head, chiefly concentrated there; the breast-man; and the man of the extremities or limbs. It must be understood however, that this third man does not consist only of arms and legs, but that these limbs have terminations within the body, as contrasted with the outside, and that all these together make up the whole third man. These three divisions must be kept in mind.
Without sinning against the reality of the super-sensible world, we cannot actually speak of three “men”: for, as regards the super-sensible being of man, a fundamental distinction exists between these three parts. The different forces, or streams of force, which went to build into the structure of these different bodily parts, come from widely different sources. If the human form is examined with super-sensible faculties, the structure of the head is seen to be derived from forces operative before birth or conception. One must go back to the spiritual world, not to the stream of physical heredity. In the formation of the head one can trace—admittedly in its finer details—a share of what belongs, in the spiritual world, to the forces of the human soul before it unites itself with the physical stream of heredity through birth or conception. The chief shore in the formation of the head, belongs not so much to the outer configuration of what a man lived through in his previous earth-life, but to his behaviour, the character of his actions, and to some extent his feelings. When super-sensible perception has so far advanced as to awaken a sense for this kind of form, it is possible to see, through the formation of the head, into what we call the preceding incarnation. Here we touch an extremely significant mystery of human development. More than is usually supposed by initiates of a lower grade, the form of the head is linked with a man's karma—with his karma as it comes over from the previous into the present incarnation.
Leaving aside the breast-man, let us focus our attention on the limb-man (or “man-of-extremities”), with the inner terminations I have mentioned. Here we find by no means so decided, so individual a form as in the head. Each person has his own individual form of head, pointing back to an earlier earth-life. The limb-system, with which the sex- organisation is essentially connected, points forward to future earth-lives. Everything there is still undifferentiated and what corresponds in the soul to this organisation points forward towards lives still to come.
To consider the breast man attentively is specially important. This part of his organism is the combined work of the forces which play their part in man's spiritual life before conception and after death between death and the next birth. What has been the soul's environment between the last death and this conception or birth, acts together with what will surround it between the next death and birth, (or conception). The two interweave. This interweaving of the two sets of forces works itself out in man's breast-organisation, and is principally noticeable in its most conspicuous activity, the process of breathing. Out-breathing gives a picture—here again we must use this word—of what took place in the soul between the last death and this birth; while in-breathing gives a picture of what will operate in and around the soul between death and the next conception or birth.
Here is a concrete fact. The procedure of ordinary anatomy and physiology is to put things down in a row:—head, breast, limbs, and in the same way a collection of nerves and blood vessels. Supersensible perception discriminates between them, realising the essential differences of these members of the human form. Ordinary anatomy and physiology see merely the immediate realities. Spiritual Science sees in the shape of the head a picture of the deeds and feelings of the last incarnation: in the out-breathing, with its distinct individual form in each person (differing in each one according to the particular formation of his head) a picture of the forces surrounding the soul between the last death and rebirth; in the in-breathing, the forces to be met with by the soul between the present death and the next birth. The life of the limbs presents a picture of the next earth-life. Thus the vast panorama of super-sensible life which lies open to spiritual consciousness is interwoven with pictures, even as daytime-life is in dreams. But these pictures represent the reality of our daily life. We arrive at the conclusion that each successive world of phenomena, viewed from the point of view of spiritual consciousness, presents the next to us in pictures. Our prosaic reality is a picture of super-sensible reality, and in dreams we have in picture-form the ordinary realities grasped in everyday life.
Spiritual consciousness is needed to make all this clear, simply because the contemplation of the outer form alone is not sufficient for the purpose. Suppose there were a person possessing a low degree of clairvoyance, of the kind in which there is more “sensing” than full perception—that might lead him, through the head, breast and limbs, to a dim idea of what has just been said, and this would not be at all difficult even to a quite low grade of clairvoyance. But there would be no certainty about it. Conviction of its accuracy could hardly be possible without the searching proof acquired through clairvoyance endowed with the states of consciousness connected with those three members of the human organism. For the head not only shows by its outer form that it points back to a former life; it is clearly marked out by its own soul-qualities, as well as by its inner construction, from the other parts of nan's being. Ordinary consciousness is blind to this fact. For either it dreams, or is occupied with daily realities and fails to notice something which “underlies”, so to speak, the activity of the head. By this I mean the following.—We go through our daily experiences in waking consciousness, we fill our minds, through the medium of the head, with outer perceptions, with the pictures brought to us by the senses, and the mental conceptions we form about the sense-pictures. For the ordinary consciousness, all this is so vivid, so intensely real, that a subtle undercurrent of finer consciousness, a low-toned background as it were, is overlooked.
The truth is that the head is dreaming all the time we are awake. This is the remarkable fact, that behind our waking: consciousness the head has a continual flow of dreams. This we can easily discover for ourselves; no very extensive training is needed, only an endeavour to attain the stage in which consciousness is “empty”—awake, but devoid of perceptions, even of thoughts. In ordinary life we are in some way or other busy with the world of outer perceptions, with memories of them, or with thoughts arising from them. Oftener than we think we are given up to a pure waking consciousness, unknowingly. It is dim. When we endeavour to attain to the soul-state which can be described as “nothing but waking”—outer perceptions, memories, and thoughts all banished, so that we are trying solely to be awake—perceptions will at once arise which are not to be clothed in ordinary ideas. They have, as they emerge, something of the nature of dim feeling—picture-like, yet lacking; the substantial character of pictures. One frequently meets people who are familiar with this state. They speak of it, perhaps, as a state of soul in which they perceive something that defies description; they perceive it, but it is not like a perception of the outer world. It is not unusual to find people speaking in this way, and there are many more than we suppose who, if we get, to know them well, will tell us about such things.
The source of these perceptions is the weaving of the “underlying” consciousness which I have mentioned, and this is itself a kind of dream. But what is the dream about? It is actually about the former incarnation, the last earth-life. The interpretation is the difficulty. Latent in the consciousness of the head lies this dream of a former life on earth. In this subjective fashion it is possible to arrive at such a dream, although it may be hard to interpret. We shall return to this question.
Hence you will see that what I have described as the human head is, in terms of soul-life, somewhat complex, inasmuch as two forms of consciousness belong to it, closely interwoven: the ordinary waking day-consciousness and the underlying dream-consciousness, which is a kind of reflection of the former incarnation. Another interesting characteristic of the life of soul concerns the other pole in man, the man of limbs, or extremities. This limb-man, too, is extremely complicated psychically—that is, in terms of the corresponding part of the soul. I have often pointed out that we are “asleep” as regards this limb-man, although “awake” as regards the head; and our will really acts as though asleep. All that we are able to bring into clear consciousness is what the will accomplishes. Nobody carrying out the idea, “I move my hand”, perceives how all the bodily apparatus comes into it. This goes on as unconsciously as do the bodily processes during sleep. Sleep continually pervades the daytime consciousness of this man of limbs, inasmuch as the will of man is sunk in sleep.
The curious thing is that this “third man” wakes in a sense at night, when, during sleep, man is outside the physical and etheric bodies, and neither consciousness nor self-consciousness function, or only very dimly. Man at his present stage cannot penetrate behind the scenes with his ordinary consciousness, because this sleep-dimness prevents him from following up the activity of the limb-man in the night, when self-consciousness is detached from the physical body. This activity is also a sort of dream. The limb-man actually “dreams” in the night. So, as the head dreams by day, below the clear day-consciousness, so the limb-man dreams in the night, below the dim sleep-consciousness—parallel with it. What does he dream? He dreams of the next earth-incarnation. In truth, we not only bear the past and future in our outer physical form, but we have within us, as soul-life, in the form of usually unrecognised dreams, an ever-present, underlying consciousness of our past and future earth-lives.
Then, as to the breast-man. Although the processes of out-breathing and in-breathing are not followed with any , distinctness by the ordinary consciousness, our organic functions are closely bound to them. In the East, the processes of out-breathing and in-breathing are so attentively followed as to be lifted into consciousness. This procedure is no longer suitable for us; we must attain spiritual consciousness in a different way. The Eastern seeker tries to dim or suppress the head-consciousness, and to stimulate, to clarify the breast-consciousness. He really tries to perform the breathing processes so as to arouse a distinctive type of breath-consciousness. Tracing the inhaled air, as it pervades his organism, and the exhaled air as it leaves the body, and streams out, he raises to consciousness what would otherwise remain unconscious. In this way he attains to a state in which he has a distinct consciousness of the reality pictured in the breathing-process—that is, of the life in the spiritual world between death and birth. This clear knowledge, of which the West has no conception at all, still Persists in the East to a much greater extent than is supposed, and is one reason why understanding between East and West is so difficult. In the East it is no theory that a life of spirit and soul lies before birth and after death, but as clear a certainty as that the road extends before and behind a traveler on the physical plane. Just as it is an obvious fact that the road in front and the road behind possess such and such features, so, for the Oriental, what lies before birth or conception and after death is not a theory, not a result of forming ideas about it; but something perceptible to him through the breathing process raised to consciousness. This breast-part of man never ceases dreaming. It does not entirely wake with our waking, or sleep with our sleeping; but there is a difference between these two states. The breast-man's dream-consciousness by day is dimmer than in the sleeping-state, when it is rather clearer; the difference is not so very great, but there is a slight variation.
This all shows us that we have not only a threefold man in our outer form, but complicated states of consciousness within us. They compose our soul-life, as they interweave and reflect each other. Through the waking-day consciousness of the head, what we know as the life of perception and thought is made possible; through the unbroken dream-consciousness of the breast-man, what we call the life of feeling; and through the limb-man's consciousness—asleep by day, but awake at night—what we call our will.
One thing more. When we consider merely the outer aspect of man, we have to do with more than a visible physical organism, for we bear a fine etheric, super-sensible organism in us—to which in the later issues of the magazine “Das Reich”, I have applied, to avoid misunderstanding, the term “body of formative forces”. It is less differentiated, compared with the physical organism; approaching nearer to a unity: only crude observation will ascribe unity to man's outer form. Man's proper unity lies in his etheric body, which can be divided into parts like the physical body, but not into limbs side by side. The parts of the etheric body call rather for the approach that we have used in speaking of states of consciousness. The etheric body also is in a constantly varying state of consciousness—a different state between waking and falling asleep from that which prevails between falling asleep and waking. Here again, with this super-sensible body, we carry something very significant in ourselves. Some theosophical theorists may think they have accomplished something important in dividing man's being into physical body, etheric body, astral body, etc., but they delude themselves. That is reducing it to a kind of system, and systematising is never any good.
The only way to gain insight is to examine what is happening in the etheric body. If anyone merely says, “We have an etheric body,” that is no more than a phrase, calling up a picture of the thinnest kind of mist, and to take this for the real thing is self-deception. The point is that in the etheric body we have something very real and substantial, though it is not perceptible in ordinary life. Living and weaving in the etheric body, ceaselessly from waking to falling asleep, is the karma of earlier earth-lives. In truth, the etheric body weaves in our subconscious, and through its weaving brings to view our karma from previous incarnations. The clairvoyant knows something of karma because he can make use of his etheric body as he does at other tires of his physical body. Anyone who has learnt to do this cannot help seeing that karma is a reality. The etheric body as concrete reality means this—from waking to falling asleep, it has the vision of karma from earlier earth-lives, and during sleep, of karma in the making. I am again describing it from a clairvoyant's point of view.
The dreams of the breast-man accordingly, are not only about experiences between the last death and birth; we look also at what the past has laid upon our shoulders as karma—at what is spread out below our normal consciousness by the functioning of the lower body, and viewed by the etheric body, although by a spiritual eye, as the karma of the past. Neither do we perceive through the consciousness of our extremities, as we breathe in, only what is bound up with the incarnation to come; for the etheric body becomes the eye of the spirit, giving us, in a fashion unknown to ordinary life, a vision of karma in the making. It is not easy for present-day man to bring the training of his soul to such a point, although it is necessary for everybody to envisage truly all that I have described. (There are certain difficulties, discussed in the book “Knowledge of Higher Worlds and its Attainment.”) It was far easier in bygone ages. Even in historical times life has undergone more changes than we think, and one momentous point in human history (described in “Occult Science” and other writings of mine) is the transition from the third to the fourth post-Atlantean epoch of civilisation, the inception of the Graeco-Latin age. It was at this point that it became so intensely difficult for civilised humanity to penetrate into the worlds I have just described. Before this, it had been comparatively easy, and Orientals still retain something of this facility. The Western man doss not possess it; therefore he cannot do the same exercises, but must resort to those described in “Knowledge of Higher Worlds.” The period which began about 700 to 600 B.C. marks a deeper descent of man into the physical world. Another period will dawn, approximately at the beginning of the third millennium after the Mystery of Golgotha, and preparation must be made for it. Something indefinable will arise in every soul—inexplicable save through occult science. It is not merely a subjective ideal or tendency which Spiritual Science has to prepare and establish in readiness for the next millennium; it answers to a need in mankind's development. The middle of the third millennium will be a critical moment in the development of civilisation, for then a point will be reached when human nature will have progressed so far that it will be thrown back into decay unless it has acquired the vision of repeated earth-lives and karma, lost since the seventh or eighth century before Christ. In earlier times, human nature had a healthy power of response; knowledge came naturally to it. In future it will become diseased unless it takes this teaching into itself. We understand our age only if we keep in mind that it lies between two poles. One pole lies far back, beyond the seventh or eighth century before the Mystery of Golgotha. Those were the times when knowledge of the soul's super-sensible experience was given by human nature itself. The other pole will be in the third millennium, when (as described in “Knowledge of Higher Worlds”) man must acquire super-sensible knowledge in spiritual ways, so that health, and not sickness, may stream into the body. Our age can be understood in both its inner and its outer aspects only if we keep this in mind. Naturally the change will be slow and gradual. But anyone who does not want to dream through the most important things of our age in a dull, sleepy way, but wishes to live in conscious wakefulness—it behooves him to mark what is seeking entry into human life. It will not enter completely until the middle of the third millennium; but little by little it will make its presence felt, and humanity must now consciously be alive to and prepare for its inevitable advent. Learn to study life, and even outer phenomena—especially those of human life—will yield a superficial perception of this truth. With a brain of the coarse development normal for most people to-day, it is certainly not easy to acquire what has to be taken intelligently into the mind, as Spiritual Science depicts it. But I would like to add this: it is tragic to see what unknown powers (I shall speak of them in the next lecture) are trying to make of mankind. At the present day there are certain sick natures—that is why I use the word ‘tragic’—which are abnormal for their time; yet they receive intimations of much that men will encounter normally in the future. I have often mentioned a very well-known contemporary whose life ran its course in alternating health and sickness: Otto Weininger, who wrote the remarkable book, “Sex and Character”. Weininger was altogether an extraordinary man. Picture someone who in his very early twenties presented the first chapter of his book as a University thesis—this book which has roused as much enthusiasm in some quarters as fury in others—both ill-founded. But something else might well have been noted. For he came to live more and more into the problems raised in his book. He travelled in Italy, jotted down his experiences, seeing very different things from other travellers in that country. I find much that is remarkable in Weiniger's Italian diary. As you know, I describe much that can be described only in Imaginations: concerning the Atlantean and Lemurian periods, and the appearance of things in times which to-day can no longer be followed with ordinary consciousness or by historical research. Certain concepts and ideas are necessary in order to present such descriptions to human consciousness. When I read Weininger's notes, something in then strikes me as a fine, artistic caricature of the truth. His life is certainly remarkable. He was only 23 when a thought struck him which puzzled him terribly: that he would have to commit suicide lest he should kill somebody else; he thought that a murderer, a criminal, was latent in his soul—a symptom easily to be explained by occultism. Equally mingled in his life were greatness, punctiliousness and affectation. He left his parents' house, took a room in Beethoven's house in Vienna, stayed there one night—and in the morning shot himself.
The characteristic of this soul was that its union with the body was never quite complete. For external psychology, Weininger was merely a case of hysteria; but for anyone who appreciates the facts it was obvious that an irregular union between his spiritual -psychic and his physical-bodily principles must have existed. With normal present-day people, the former principles leave the latter at the moment of falling asleep, rejoining it on awaking; but with Weininger it was different. I could show you passages from which it is evident that at times his spiritual-psychic part was just a little outside his physical-bodily part and then suddenly dived down into it: as this occurred, a thought flashed through him, which he wrote down often in quite a dry fashion: but of course in diving down he acted imaginatively—and very strangely. To anybody who understands the matter it is clear that an irregular union of these principles brings in a remarkable and peculiar way a knowledge which humanity will have in the future. Think—in a man labeled “hysterical” by a clumsy psychology, there arises a knowledge which all humanity must possess in times to come—only it is caricatured. From what I have said you can quite understand that through such abnormalities something like pioneers of the future appear amongst us, (just as there are “stragglers” from the past): a future in which humanity will inevitably know about recurrent earth-lives, about karma and the dreams of karma. And because such people appear as the pioneers of the future, the knowledge makes them ill. So, by means of an unhealthy organism, there comes out in caricature what is some day to be the wisdom of humanity. Look for instance at a paragraph in Weininger's “Last Things”, (printed by his friend Rappaport): “Perhaps no memory is possible of the state before birth, because we have sunk so deeply through birth itself; we have lost the consciousness and chosen to be born through impulse alone, without rational decision or knowledge, and that is why we know nothing of such a past.”
One thing is clear—although the knowledge shining forth in this utterance is a caricature, yet someone writes as though absolutely convinced: “Through my birth I passed from a state, a spiritual life, in which I previously lived.” If that had been written ten or twelve centuries before the birth of Christ, or at the time of Origen, it would not have been surprising, but here in our time is a man who has set such a thing down in a fashion of his own, full of passionate feeling, as a direct illumination of consciousness, not as a theory.
I could adduce many such instances. What do they mean? They are presages of the super-sensible knowledge which is coming to mankind, and because it is not sought on the path of anthroposophical spiritual science, it comes convulsively, shattering human nature, making it sick, as in the case of Weininger. I say “sick”, not in the common sense of the word, but surely the outer facts show that there is something really abnormal when a man of twenty-three shoots himself because he finds a hidden murderer concealed within him, and saves himself from becoming a murderer by committing suicide.
A hundred,—nay, a thousand,—examples could be given; this knowledge must inevitably come; and it be well if as many souls as possible could be awakened to the fact. In the subconscious of mankind the longing for such knowledge is extraordinarily widespread. External powers, which I have often described, hold it back. We must very carefully keep in mind what is implied in the close of my article on Christian Rosenkreutz, in “Das Reich.” We must remember that what became evident in the seventeenth century had been noticeable since the fifteenth, Growing steadily stronger. In speaking of it now to people of our own time, the customary scientific formulae must be used. I described in the last number of “Das Reich” how it was manifested in the writing of the “Chemical Marriage” of Christian Rosenkreuz by Johann Valentin Andreae. Philologists have racked their brains about this: Johann Valentin Andreae wrote down the “Chemical Marriage”, in which really deep occult knowledge was hidden, but behaved afterwards in a very remarkable fashion, Not only was he unable to explain certain words he had spoken in connection with writings which he had produced at the same time as the “Chemical Marriage”, but in spite of having transcribed this great work, he appeared to be entirely without understanding of it. This bigoted Pastor, who afterwards wrote all kinds of other things, does not understand anything of the “Chemical Marriage”, nor of the other works composed by him at the same period. He was only seventeen when he wrote it. He never altered; he remained just the same person; but a totally different power had spoken through him. Philologists cudgelled their brains, and corresponded about it. His hand wrote it; his body was present, assisting; but through his human equipment a spiritual power, not then in earthly incarnation, wished to make it known to mankind, in the style of those days.
Then came the Thirty Years War, the tomb of much which should then have come to mankind. What should have been then understood, was not understood, was even consigned to oblivion. The “Chemical Marriage” was written down about 1603, ostensibly by one who signed himself Johann Valentin Andreae; little notice was taken of it because in 1613 the Thirty Years War began. Such things often happen before a war. Then one can truly read in the signs of the times: “What is now planted as a seed, must one day bear flowers and fruit”.
This is all part of what I am now pointing out—what is to be read in the signs of the times, in our own catastrophic century.
Fünfzehnter Vortrag
Ich möchte heute zusammenfassend auf Verschiedenes zurückkommen und es erweitern, was hier im Laufe der Zeit besprochen worden ist, weil ich dadurch eine Grundlage schaffen möchte zu einigen weiteren ganz prinzipiellen Ausführungen, die wir in der nächsten Zeit hier absolvieren wollen.
Im geisteswissenschaftlichen Forschen tritt zu den zwei Bewußtseinsformen, die jeder Mensch kennt - das Traumbewußtsein und das gewöhnliche Tagesbewußtsein, in dem wir vom Aufwachen bis zum Einschlafen leben -, eine dritte hinzu, diejenige, die wir das schauende Bewußtsein nennen. Das Traumbewußtsein kennen wir allerdings im gewöhnlichen Leben nur wie eine Art Unterbrechung des fortwährenden Bewußtseins. Allein, das ist nur aus dem Grunde, weil der Mensch sich nur zum geringen Teil seiner Träume erinnert. Er träumt eigentlich fortwährend vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen, und was wir gewöhnlich als den Inhalt unseres Traumbewußtseins bezeichnen, das sind ja nur diejenigen Teile unserer gesamten Traumerlebnisse, an die sich der Mensch im wachen Tagesleben erinnert. Vom Standpunkte der Geisteswissenschaft aus müssen wir also sagen: Wir kennen drei Stufen oder auch drei Arten unseres Bewußtseins: das Traumbewußtsein, das gewöhnliche tagwachende Bewußtsein und das schauende Bewußtsein, dem die übersinnliche Welt offen ist. |
Nun wird es Ihnen ein leichtes sein, mit einer Eigenschaft eines jeden folgenden Bewußtseins mit Bezug auf das vorhergehende wenn wir von oben, vom schauenden Bewußtsein anfangen — sich vertraut zu machen. Denken Sie nur an das Traumbewußtsein: Es gibt uns Bilder. Wir wissen, daß die Traumerlebnisse Bilder sind. Sie können, wenn Sie besonnen sind, diese Traumerlebnisse nicht ohne weiteres einreihen in den Ursachenzusammenhang des Tageslebens. Würden Sie das wollen, würden Sie Traumleben und Tagesleben vermischen, Sie würden zu Phantasten werden. Also mit Bildern haben wir es in den Traumerlebnissen zu tun, im Gegensatz zur Wirklichkeit. Wirklichkeiten nennen wir dabei die Tageserlebnisse.
Wenn wir aber nun das Verhältnis aufsuchen zwischen den gewöhnlichen Tageserlebnissen und dem Inhalt des schauenden Bewußtseins, dann haben wir ein ganz Ähnliches. Denn für das, was das schauende Bewußtsein als geistige, übersinnliche Wirklichkeit erlebt, ist das, was wir im gewöhnlichen Tagesleben vom Aufwachen bis zum Einschlafen erleben, Bild. Also insofern der Mensch im schauenden Bewußtsein, das heißt in einem erweckten Zustande sich befindet, kann er durchaus sagen, er muß es nur mit Besonnenheit tun: Ich erlebe in diesem schauenden Bewußtsein eine wahre Wirklichkeit, und dieser Wirklichkeit gegenüber ist das, was man sonst Wirklichkeit nennt, nur eine Summe von Bildern.
So abstrakt die Sache ausgesprochen, hat sie nicht viel Wert. Gewiß, viele Menschen sind schon recht zufrieden, wenn sie solche Sachen abstrakt aussprechen. Sie glauben, mit einem solchen abstrakten Aussprechen Weltenrätsel zu lösen. Das tut man aber nicht. Einen Wert hat eine solche Sache nur, wenn man auf das ganz Konkrete, auf das Unmittelbare der Lebenspraxis eingeht. Das kann man aber immer nur auf bestimmten Gebieten.
Nun habe ich Sie schon im Laufe der Zeit auf ein Gebiet aufmerksam gemacht, das wir immer wieder und wieder betrachten müssen, wenn wir im Geisteswissenschaftlichen weiterkommen wollen. Es ist dies Gebiet — das uns nächstliegende, unserer Erkenntnis oftmals so fernliegende — der Mensch selber. Man glaubt gewöhnlich, den physischen Menschen kenne man; man kenne nur nicht den übersinnlichen Menschen. Aber auch das ist nur bis zu einem gewissen Grade der Fall. Was man im gewöhnlichen Leben Anatomie, Physiologie nennt, das webt ja in unzähligen Illusionen. Wir wollen heute zunächst einmal ausgehen, aber nur scheinbar, von der äußeren Gestalt des Menschen: von dem physischen Menschen. Wir wollen uns dabei auf jene Dreigliederung des physischen Menschen beziehen, die ich schon öfter angeführt habe.
Betrachtet man den Menschen in seinem Verhältnis zur übersinnlichen Welt, also so, wie er Bild ist, nicht wie er eine Wirklichkeit ist im Sinne der landläufigen Anatomie und Physiologie, so zerfällt er in drei streng voneinander verschiedene Teile auch mit Bezug auf seine äußere physische Gestalt: in den Hauptesmenschen, den Menschen, der vorzugsweise im Haupt konzentriert ist, in den Rumpfesmenschen und in den Extremitäten- oder Gliedmaßenmenschen, nur müssen wir uns dabei vorstellen, daß dieser dritte Mensch nicht nur aus Armen und Beinen besteht, sondern daß diese Gliedmaßen ihre «Einläufer» im Gegensatz zu den «Ausläufern» — fortsetzen, und daß dies der ganze Mensch ist. Diese drei wollen wir einmal ins Auge fassen. Man könnte eigentlich gar nicht, ohne gegen die Wirklichkeit des Übersinnlichen zu sündigen, von drei Menschen wirklich sprechen; denn mit Bezug auf das Übersinnliche des Menschen haben diese drei eben angeführten Glieder eine ganz erhebliche Kluft zwischen einander. Die verschiedenen Kräfte, oder, sagen wir, Kraftströmungen, welche an der Bildung dieser Gestaltenglieder teilnehmen, gehen nach ganz verschiedenen Seiten hin. Wenn man mit übersinnlicher Erkenntnis die menschliche Gestalt untersucht, so ist das Haupt wirklich so gebildet, daß man seine Bildungskräfte eigentlich vor der Geburt oder Empfängnis suchen muß. Man muß rückwärts in die geistige Welt gehen, nicht in die physische Vererbungsströmung. So wie des Menschen Haupt gebildet ist- man muß dann allerdings auf die feinere Bildung eingehen -, so hat an dieser Bildung vorzugsweise alles das Anteil, was in der geistigen Welt an Kräften des Menschen Seele durchsetzt, bevor sie dutch die Geburt oder Empfängnis sich mit der physischen Vererbungsströmung vereinigt hat. Und einen hauptsächlichen Anteil gerade an der Bildung des Hauptes hat nicht einmal so sehr das, was der Mensch in seinem vorherigen Erdenleben durchlebt hat, nicht seiner Gestalt nach, sondern seinem Aufführen, seinen Taten, auch zum Teil seinen Gefühlen nach. Wenn übersinnliche Erkenntnis so weit gekommen ist, daß sie in sich den Sinn für eine solche Gestalt erweckt hat, so schaut sie von der Gestaltung des Hauptes hinüber in das, was man die vorherige Inkarnation nennt. Man berührt da außerordentlich bedeutsame Geheimnisse der menschlichen Entwickelung. Und mehr, als gewöhnlich von Eingeweihten niederer Sorte vorausgesetzt wird, hängt die menschliche Hauptesgestalt mit dem Karma zusammen, wie es sich aus der vorherigen Inkarnation herüberentwickelt.
_Fassen wir jetzt, indem wir den Rumpfesmenschen auslassen, den Extremitätenmenschen ins Auge, aber mit seinen Fortsetzungen nach innen. In diesem Extremitätenmenschen haben wir etwas, was uns keineswegs in einer so ausgesprochenen, so individuellen Gestaltung entgegentritt wie im menschlichen Haupte. Jeder Mensch hat sein individuell ausgebildetes Haupt, weil das Haupt zurück weist auf frühere Erdenleben. Mit Bezug auf die Extremitätenorganisation, mit der die Sexualorganisation wesentlich zusammenhängt, weist der Mensch hin auf seine folgenden Erdenleben. Da ist noch alles undifferenziert. Das seelische Korrelat für diesen Organismus weist auf die folgenden Erdenleben hin. Ganz besonders wichtig ist auch, daß man die Rumpforganisation ins Auge faßt. Sie ist ein Zusammenwirken aus Kräften, welche im menschlichen Geistesleben spielen vor der Geburt oder Empfängnis und nach dem Tode, also zwischen dem Tode und der nächsten Geburt. Was also die Seele zwischen dem letzten Tode und dieser Empfängnis oder dieser Geburt umgeben hat, das wirkt zusammen mit dem, was sie umgeben wird zwischen diesem Tode und der nächsten Geburt oder Empfängnis. Das webt sich ineinander. Und dieses Ineinanderweben der Kräfte wirkt im menschlichen Rumpfesorganismus, und zwar so, daß es hauptsächlich anschaulich wird in demjenigen, was ja auch das Hervorragendste in der Betätigung der Rumpfesorganisation ist: im Atmungsprozeß, so daß das Ausatmen vorzugsweise ein Bild - jetzt komme ich auch hier zu dem Ausdrucke «Bild» — dessen ist, was sich mit der Seele abgespielt hat seit dem letzten Tode bis zu dieser Empfängnis; und die Einatmung ist ein Bild desjenigen, was sich an Kräften um und in der Seele abspielen wird zwischen dem Tode, der uns nach dieser Verkörperung treffen wird, und der nächsten Empfängnis oder Geburt.
Hier haben Sie ein Konkretes auf diesem Gebiete. Was die gewöhnliche Anatomie und Physiologie an der menschlichen Gestalt betrachtet, das betrachtet sie so, daß sie die Dinge nebeneinander hinstellt: Hier sind Kopf und Rumpf und Gliedmaßen in gleicher Weise eine Summe von Nerven und Blutgefäßen. Die übersinnliche Erkenntnis muß die Dinge auseinanderhalten; ihr sind die verschiedenen Gestaltenglieder verschiedenwertig. So sieht die gewöhnliche Anatomie und Physiologie unmittelbare Wirklichkeiten. Unsere Geisteswissenschaft sieht in der Hauptesgestalt das Bild von den Taten und Fühlungen der vorigen Inkarnation; sie sieht in der Ausatmung, wie sie sich bei jedem Menschen doch individuell gestaltet - denn jeder hat in dem Grade, wie sein Haupt differenziert ist, auch den Atmungsprozeß differenziert -— ein Bild der Kräfte, welche die Seele zwischen dem letzten Tode und der nächsten Geburt umspielten, und der Einatmungsprozeß ist ja ein Bild dessen, was die Seele umspielen wird an Kräften zwischen dem jetzigen Tode und der nächsten Geburt. Und in dem Extremitätenprozeß haben wir schon ein Bild vom nächsten Erdenleben. So wird in der Tat, wie im Traume das Tagesleben von Bildern durchwoben wird, das großartig ausgedehnte übersinnliche Leben, das sich dem schauenden Bewußtsein öffnet, von Bildern durchwoben. Aber diese Bilder sind unsere gegebene, im Tagwachen gegebene Wirklichkeit. Wir kommen also dazu, daß wir jede folgende Erscheinungswelt, angefangen vom schauenden Bewußtsein, auffinden als Bilder der nächsten Erscheinungen. Unsere prosaische Wirklichkeit ist Bild der übersinnlichen Wirklichkeit, und unsere Traumeswirklichkeit ist Bild der gewöhnlichen, im Alltagsleben erfaßten Wirklichkeit.
Was ich hier sage, wird eigentlich erst so recht dem schauenden Bewußtsein klar, aus dem einfachen Grunde, weil in der äußeren Gestalt allein man nicht recht aufsuchen kann, was ich jetzt angeführt habe. Nehmen Sie einmal an, es hätte jemand einen niederen Grad von Hellsichtigkeit, gerade von dem Hellsehen, in dem mehr geahnt wird, als in voller Besonnenheit erfaßt, so könnte er noch aus der Erfassung des Hauptes, des Rumpfes und der Gliedmaßen erahnend auf das kommen, was ich jetzt gesagt habe. Auch einem niederen Grade des Hellsehens wäre das nicht besonders schwierig. Aber man würde keine Sicherheit haben; man würde sich kaum davon überzeugt halten, wenn man es nicht kritisch prüfen könnte durch jenes Hellsehen, das nun auch die entsprechenden Bewußtseinszustände erfaßt für das, was ich jetzt als Glieder der menschlichen Gestalt angeführt habe. Denn dieses Haupt ist nicht nur in seiner äußeren Gestalt so, daß es auf vorige Leben hinweist, sondern es ist schon so, daß es auch in bezug auf sein Seelisches erstens sich gut abdifferenziert von den andern Teilen des Menschenwesens, aber auch in sich selbst sich merkwürdig differenziert. Die Sache verbirgt sich nur dem gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein. Denn dieses träumt entweder, oder es hat während des Inhalts der alltäglichen Wirklichkeit - aber es merkt dies nicht - für den Kopf des Menschen etwas anderes, wenn ich mich des Ausdruckes bedienen darf: unterlegt. Ich meine folgendes damit: Wir gehen im wachenden Bewußtsein durch unsere Alltagserfahrungen; wir erfüllen uns durch das Bewußtsein, das uns unser Kopf vermittelt, mit den äußeren Wahrnehmungen, mit den Bildern, die uns von den Sinnen kommen, und mit dem, was wir uns als Vorstellungen über diese Sinnesbilder machen. Das alles ist für das gewöhnliche wache Bewußtsein so lebhaft, so intensiv, daß ein feineres Bewußtsein, das fortwährend darunter rieselt — ich sagte deshalb, daß es unterlegt ist -, ein hintergründliches Bewußtsein, das nicht so sehr tönt wie das Tagesbewußtsein, übersehen wird.
Unser Kopf träumt nämlich fortwährend, wenn wir wachen. Das ist das Bedeutsame, daß unser Haupt hinter dem Tagesbewußtsein ein fortwährendes Fortträumen hat. Sie können auf dieses Fortträumen schon kommen; man braucht dazu nicht sehr weitgehende Übungen zu machen. Man braucht dazu eigentlich nur zu versuchen, in jenen Zustand des seelischen Lebens einzutreten, in welchem man leeres Bewußtsein hat, wo das Bewußtsein zwar wach ist, aber keine Wahrnehmungen und auch keine Gedanken hat. Im gewöhnlichen Leben gehen ja die Dinge so, daß man entweder irgendwie auf die äußere Wahrnehmungswelt gerichtet ist, oder Erinnerungsbilder von diesen Wahrnehmungen hat, oder aufsteigende Gedanken, die auch mit diesen Erinnerungen zusammenhängen. Man gibt sich öfter, als man glaubt, dem bloßen wachenden Bewußtsein hin, aber man bemerkt es nicht. Es ist dumpf. Wenn Sie aber versuchen, in Ihrer Seelenverfassung das zu haben, was ich nennen möchte: «nichts weiter als wachen», nichts, was herstammt weder von äußeren Wahrnehmungen noch Erinnerungen daran, noch Erinnerungsgedanken, wenn Sie bloß versuchen zu wachen, so werden Ihnen alsbald nicht so ganz ordentlich in Vorstellungen gekleidete Wahrnehmungen aufsteigen. So etwas dumpf Gefühlsmäßiges haben diese Vorstellungen, die da auftauchen. Sie können sagen: Sie nehmen sich aus wie Bilder, aber sie nehmen sich so aus, daß sie nicht die Vollgewichtigkeit von Bildern haben. Man trifft oft Menschen, welche diesen Zustand haben. Die sagen: Es gibt in mir eine Seelenverfassung, da nehme ich etwas wahr, was ich aber nicht beschreiben kann; es ist wahrgenommen, aber es ist nicht in der Weise ein Wahrnehmen, wie man die äußere Welt wahrnimmt. — Es ist nicht unzutreffend, wenn die Menschen so sprechen, und es gibt viel mehr Menschen, als man glaubt, die, sobald man mit ihnen vertraut wird, über solche Dinge Mitteilungen machen können.
Was da aufsteigt, ist das Weben dieses unterlegten Bewußtseins, von dem ich gesprochen habe. Und dieses unterlegte Bewußtsein ist eine Art Träumen. Aber was wird geträumt? Es wird geträumt, tatsächlich geträumt, von der vorigen Inkarnation, von dem vorigen Erdenleben. Nur ist die Deutung dann schwierig. Aber was so im Bewußtsein, im Hauptesbewußtsein sitzt, ist Traum des vorigen Erdenlebens. Auf diese subjektive Art, die ich geschildert habe, kann man schon den Traum des vorigen Erdenlebens finden, wenn auch die Deutung schwierig ist. Davon wollen wir noch später reden.
So ist das, was ich als menschliches Haupt schilderte, auch seelisch etwas Kompliziertes, indem eigentlich zwei Bewußtseine ineinanderlaufen: das gewöhnliche tagwachende Bewußtsein und das unterlegte Traumbewußtsein, das eine Art Spiegelung aus der vorigen Inkarnation ist.
Eine andere interessante Seelencharakteristik können wir geben, wenn wir einen andern Pol des Menschen ins Auge fassen: den Extremitäten-, den Gliedmaßenmenschen. Auch dieser Gliedmaßenmensch ist seelisch — das heißt in seinem seelischen Korrelat, was ihm seelisch entspricht — eigentlich wiederum kompliziert. Ich habe öfter darauf aufmerksam gemacht, daß wir mit Bezug auf diesen Gliedmaßenmenschen schlafen, während wir mit Bezug auf unser Haupt wachen. Und unser Wille wirkt wirklich wie schlafend. Wir haben ja nur die Vorstellung dessen, was unser Wille ausführt. Niemand hat, wenn er die Vorstellung ausführt: Ich bewege die Hand -, ein Bewußtsein davon, wie dies mit alldem organischen Apparat zusammenhängt. Das ist so unterbewußt, wie die Vorgänge des Schlafes. Schlaf durchzieht fortwährend das Tagesbewußtsein dieses Gliedmaßen-, dieses Extremitätenmenschen, und zwar indem das Wollen des Menschen i in einen Schlafzustand eingetaucht ist.
Nun aber ist das Merkwürdige: Wenn nachts, im Schlafe, der Mensch aus seinem physischen Leibe heraus ist, das heißt, wenn das Ich und der astralische Leib den physischen Leib und den ätherischen Leib verlassen haben, wenn also Bewußtsein und Selbstbewußtsein nicht oder nur dumpf funktionieren, dann wacht in einer gewissen Weise gerade dieser Extremitätenmensch. Nur hat der Mensch, wie er jetzt in seiner Entwickelung ist, keine Möglichkeit, mit dem gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein dahinterzukommen. Weil er schlafend sein Bewußtsein nur dumpf betätigen kann, so kann er nicht mit dem Bewußtsein verfolgen, was der bei Tag schlafende Gliedmaßenmensch in der Nacht, wenn das Selbstbewußtsein nicht im physischen Leibe drinnen ist, eigentlich vollführt. Es ist auch eine Art Träumen. Es träumt dieser Gliedmaßenmensch eigentlich in der Nacht. So wie der Kopf bei Tage unter dem hellen Tagesbewußtsein träumt, so träumt der Gliedmaßenmensch schlafend unter dem dumpfen Schlafbewußtsein, man könnte sagen, parallel neben dem dumpfen Schlafbewußtsein. Und was träumt er? Er träumt von der nächsten Erdeninkarnation. Wir tragen als Mensch in der Tat in bezug auf unsere äußere physische Gestalt nicht nur Vergangenheit und Zukunft in uns, sondern wir tragen in uns, in unserem Seelenleben, in Form von gewöhnlich nicht wahrnehmbaren Träumen, in Form von allerlei unterlegtem Bewußtsein, vorige Erdenleben und künftige Erdenleben.
Und der Rumpfesmensch. Die Vorgänge des Aus- und Einatmens werden ja vom gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein nicht mit Deutlichkeit verfolgt, aber die organischen Funktionen sind doch enger daran geknüpft. Gerade diese Aus- und Einatmungsprozesse werden ja von den Orientalen — was uns nicht mehr angemessen ist, wir müssen auf andere Weise in das schauende Bewußtsein eintreten — gerade so verfolgt, daß sie ins Bewußtsein heraufgehoben werden. Der Orientale, als Geistsucher, versucht das Kopfbewußtsein dumpf zu machen, zu unterdrücken, und dagegen das Rumpfbewußtsein anzuregen, zu erhellen. Er versucht wirklich den Atmungsprozeß so auszuführen, daß im Atmen Bewußtsein auftaucht. Das ist ein anderes Bewußtsein. Indem er die eingeatmete Luft verfolgt, wie sie sich im Organismus ausbreitet, und indem er verfolgt die ausgeatmete Luft, wie sie herausströmt und den Leib verläßt, hebt er ins Bewußtsein herauf, was sonst recht unbewußt bleibt. Dadurch kommt bei ihm das zustande, daß er ein sehr deutliches Bewußtsein von dem hat, wovon der Atmungsprozeß Bild ist: von dem Leben in der geistigen Welt zwischen dem Tode und der Geburt. Das deutliche Wissen, von dem sich der Okzidentale eigentlich gar keinen Begriff macht, das heute im Orient noch immer sehr viel mehr ausgebreitet ist, als man denkt - deshalb verstehen sich auch der Orientale und der Okzidentale oft so schwer -, das deutliche Bewußtsein davon, daß vor der Geburt ein geistig-seelisches Leben liegt, nach dem Tode ein geistig-seelisches Leben folgt, das ist dort keine Theorie, sondern das ist dort so Gewißheit, wie es für Sie eine Gewißheit ist, wenn Sie irgendwo einen Weg gegangen sind, stehenbleiben, zurückschauen und das, was Sie als Weg durchgemacht haben, anschauen und dann rückwärtsblicken. Wie das für Sie eine Gewißheit ist, die neben Ihnen ist, daß der Weg vorher und der Weg nachher dieses und jenes enthält, so ist es für den Orientalen keine Theorie, nicht etwas, worauf er durch Vorstellungsverbindung kommt, sondern was er anschaut, aber anschaut durch seinen ins Bewußtsein heraufgehobenen Atmungsprozeß: was vor der Geburt oder Empfängnis und was nach dem Tode liegt.
Dieser Teil des Menschen, der Rumpfesmensch können wir sagen, träumt fortwährend. Der wacht nicht ganz auf, wenn wir wachen, der schläft auch nicht ganz ein, wenn wir schlafen. Ein Unterschied zwischen diesen beiden Zeiten ist ja doch. Das Bewußtsein, das Traumesbewußtsein dieses Rumpfesmenschen bei Tage ist dumpfer als sein Traumesbewußtsein im schlafenden Zustande, dies ist etwas heller; der Unterschied ist zwar nicht so sehr groß, aber es ist doch eine Abschattierung da.
So sehen wir, daß wir nicht nur der äußeren Gestalt nach einen dreigliedrigen Menschen, sondern auch komplizierte Bewußtseinszustände in uns tragen. Darin besteht aber unser Seelenleben. Diese Bewußtseinszustände wirken ineinander, spiegeln sich ineinander. Durch das tagwachende Bewußtsein unseres Hauptes kommt vorzugsweise das zustande, was wir unser Vorstellungs- und Denkleben nennen; durch das fortwährende Traumesbewußtsein unseres Rumpfesmenschen kommt das zustande, was wir unser Gefühlsleben nennen, und durch das bei Tag schlafende, bei der Nacht wachende Traumesbewußtsein des Gliedmaßenmenschen kommt das zustande, was wir unser Wollen nennen.
Nun bleibt noch eines übrig. Wir haben, wenn wir bloß die Außenseite des Menschen ins Auge fassen, es nicht nur mit dem sichtbaren physischen Organismus des Menschen zu tun, sondern wir tragen auch einen feinen, ätherischen, übersinnlichen Organismus in uns, den ich, damit keine Mißverständnisse entstehen, in den neueren Ausführungen in der Zeitschrift «Das Reich» den Bildekräfteleib genannt habe. Dieser übersinnliche Organismus ist im Verhältnis zum äußeren physischen Organismus weniger differenziert, er ist eigentlich mehr eine Einheit; und nur durch eine grobe Beobachtung schreiben wir der äußeren Gestalt des Menschen eine Einheit zu. Die eigentliche Einheit des Menschen ruht in seinem ätherischen Leibe. Dieser ätherische Leib ist nun geradeso zu gliedern wie der physische Leib, aber eben nicht so, daß die Glieder nebeneinanderliegen; sondern beim ätherischen Leibe muß man so die Gliederung vornehmen, wie ich es zuletzt getan habe mit Bezug auf die Bewußtseinszustände. Dieser ätherische Leib ist auch in immer abwechselndem Bewußtsein, und zwar so, daß er im Tagesleben vom Aufwachen bis zum Einschlafen ein anderes Bewußtsein hat als vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen. Da tragen wir wieder mit diesem übersinnlichen Leibe etwas sehr Bedeutungsvolles in uns. Wenn manche theosophische Theoretiker glauben, schon etwas besonderes damit getan zu haben, daß sie den Menschen gliedern in physischen Leib, ätherischen Leib, astralischen Leib und so weiter, so ist das eigentlich eine Art von Selbsttäuschung. Es ist eine Art von Systematik, und Systematiken sind nie eigentlich etwas wert. Einsichten bekommt man erst, wenn man näher untersucht, was eigentlich in diesem ätherischen Leibe vorgeht. Denn wenn man nur sagt: In uns lebt der ätherische Leib -, so hat der Mensch zunächst nur ein Wort, täuscht sich hinweg, glaubt eine Sache zu haben, indem er sich einen möglichst dünnen Nebel und so weiter vorstellt. Das ist aber Selbsttäuschung. Worauf es ankommt, das ist, daß wir in diesem Ätherleibe etwas sehr Wesentliches haben, nur kann es der Mensch im gewöhnlichen Leben nicht wahrnehmen. Aber was in diesem Ätherleibe im Tagesleben vom Aufwachen bis zum Einschlafen immer webt und lebt, das ist das Karma von früheren Erdenleben, das schaut er an. In der Tat, in unserem Unterbewußtsein webt dieser Ätherleib, und sein Weben ist Anschauung unseres Karma aus früheren Verkörperungen. Daß der Hellseher etwas vom Karma weiß, beruht darauf, daß er den Ätherleib so gebrauchen lernt wie sonst den physischen Leib. Lernt man ihn gebrauchen, so kann man gar nicht da herumkommen, im Karma eine Wirklichkeit zu sehen. Denn vom Aufwachen bis zum Einschlafen ist der Ätherleib konkret, als Wirklichkeit gefaßt, dies, daß er das Karma anschaut, und zwar vom Aufwachen bis zum Einschlafen das Karma aus früheren Erdenleben, und vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen das werdende Karma. Es ist dies wieder vom hellsichtigen Gesichtspunkte aus geschildert.
Also wir träumen in unserer Brust nicht nur von dem, was wir zwischen dem letzten Tode und dieser Geburt durchgemacht haben, wir schauen nicht nur in dieser Weise die Vergangenheit an, wir schauen auch auf das, was sie uns als Karma auferlegt, das unter unserem gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein durch die Funktion des Unterleibes von dem Ätherleibe wie vor einem geistigen Auge als vergangenes Karma geschaut wird. Und wir schauen nicht nur durch unser Extremitätenbewußtsein durch das Einatmen das, was verknüpft ist mit einer folgenden Inkarnation, sondern unser Ätherleib wird das Geistesauge, durch das wir auf eine für das gewöhnliche Leben unbewußte Art das werdende Karma anschauen. Es ist für den Menschen der Gegenwart nicht leicht, die Übungen seiner Seele so weit zu treiben, obwohl es durchaus für jeden Menschen nötig ist, daß er alles das wirklich anschaut, was ich jetzt geschildert habe. Es bietet gewisse Schwierigkeiten, über die Näheres in dem Buche «Wie erlangt man Erkenntnisse der höheren Welten?» gesagt ist. Viel leichter ging das in der Zeit, die abgelaufenem Lebensalter der Erdenmenschheit entspricht. Denn auch das geschichtliche Leben ist differenzierter, als man denkt, und ein besonders wichtiger Punkt im geschichtlichen Leben der Menschheit, der auch in meiner «Geheimwissenschaft im Umriß» und in andern Schriften charakterisiert ist, ist der, als der vierte nachatlantische Kulturzeitraum den dritten ablöste, als das begann, was wir die griechisch-lateinische Kultur nennen. Dieser Zeitraum ist der, in welchem es für die Kulturmenschheit so schwierig geworden ist, in diese Welten einzudringen, die ich jetzt geschildert habe. Vorher war es verhältnismäßig leichter, und die Orientalen haben sich etwas von dieser leichteren Natur zurückbehalten. Der Okzidentale hat es nicht, darum kann er auch nicht die Übungen machen, welche von den Orientalen geschildert werden, sondern nur diejenigen machen, die zum Beispiel in dem Buche «Wie erlangt man Erkenntnisse der höheren Welten?» beschrieben sind. Das Zeitalter, das mit dem 7., 8. Jahrhundert vor dem Mysterium von Golgatha eingetreten ist, ist schon dasjenige, in dem der Mensch mehr in die physische Welt herausgeworfen wurde. Es wird ein anderes Zeitalter wieder kommen -— ungefähr das 3. Jahrtausend wird der deutliche Beginn dieses Zeitalters sein -, und das muß vorbereitet sein. Da wird etwas Unbestimmtes aus der Menschennatur in jeder Seele auftreten; man wird es nicht deuten können, wenn man es nicht mit der Geheimwissenschaft kann, wenn man ihm nicht mit Geisteswissenschaft entgegenkommt. Es ist wirklich nicht bloß ein subjektives Ideal oder eine subjektive Tendenz, was die Geisteswissenschaft für das nächste Jahrtausend vorbereiten und begründen muß, sondern es entspricht einer Notwendigkeit in der Menschheitsentwickelung. Die Mitte des 3. Jahrtausends wird ein bedeutungsvoller Einschnitt in der Kulturentwickelung sein, weil dann der Zeitpunkt kommt, wo die Menschennatur so weit sein wird, daß sie ungesund reagieren wird, wenn die Menschen bis dahin nicht die Anschauung von den wiederholten Erdenleben und vom Karma in sich aufnehmen, die in der Zeit seit dem 7., 8. vorchristlichen Jahrhundert verlorengegangen ist. Vorher hat die Menschennatur gesund reagiert, da ging das Wissen selbst aus ihr hervor. Nachher wird sie krankhaft erscheinen, wenn die Menschen ihr nicht die Lehre entgegenbrächten. Wir verstehen unser Zeitalter nur, wenn wir dies ins Auge fassen, daß wir zwischen zwei Polen eingeschlossen sind. Der eine liegt zurück hinter dem 7., 8. Jahrhundert vor dem Mysterium von Golgatha. Das war die Zeit, wo die Menschennatur selbst das Wissen von den übersinnlichen Erlebnissen der Menschenseele hergab. Der andere Pol wird das 3. Jahrtausend sein, wo die Menschenseele aus sich heraus auf eben die Art, wie es in dem Buche «Wie erlangt man Erkenntnisse der höheren Welten?» beschrieben ist, das übersinnliche Wissen sich auf geistige Art erwerben muß, damit der Körper, in den dann die Gesundheit hineinstrahlen muß, nicht mit der Krankheit reagiert. Man versteht unser Zeitalter in seinen äußeren und inneren Erscheinungen nur, wenn man dies ins Auge fassen kann. Das entwickelt sich natürlich langsam und allmählich. Und für denjenigen Menschen, der nicht dumpf, wie schlafend die wichtigsten Dinge seines Zeitalters verträumen will, sondern der selbstbewußt, wachend leben will, für ihn geziemt es sich, in unserer Zeit schon darauf aufzumerken, was ins Leben herein will. In voller Art wird dies erst in der Mitte des 3. Jahrtausends hereinkommen. Aber nach und nach will es herein, und die Menschheit muß jetzt alles bewußt machen, muß bewußt vorbereiten, was da herein will. Man muß das Leben beobachten lernen; dann zeigt sich auch in den äußeren Erscheinungen — zunächst in den Erscheinungen des Menschenlebens - eine oberflächliche Anschauung, daß es wahr ist, was“ich jetzt gesagt habe. In der groben Gehirnentwickelung, die heute zumeist das Normale der Menschheit ist, geht ja nicht leicht dasjenige auf, was sinngemäß erworben werden muß, so wie wir es in der Geisteswissenschaft schildern. Aber ich möchte sagen: Auf tragische Weise sieht man gewissermaßen, was unbekannte Mächte - von denen ich im nächsten Vortrage sprechen werde — von der Menschheit eigentlich wollen. Es gibt in der Gegenwart gewisse krankhafte Naturen, deshalb sagte ich, auf tragische Weise; sie sind krankhaft für die Gegenwart; trotzdem kündigt sich an ihnen mancherlei an, was den Menschen in gesunden Tagen der Zukunft treffen wird.
Ich habe öfter den Namen eines sehr merkwürdigen Menschen der Gegenwart ausgesprochen, der wirklich in seinem Leben zwischen Gesundheit und Krankheit hin und her pendelte: Orzo Weininger, der das merkwürdige Buch «Geschlecht und Charakter» geschrieben hat. Es ist ja der ganze Weininger ein höchst merkwürdiger Mensch. Stellen Sie sich einen Menschen vor, der aus dem ersten Kapitel dieses genannten Buches im Anfang seiner Zwanzigerjahre seine Dissertation macht, dieses Buches, über das einzelne ebenso in Begeisterung gekommen sind, wie andere sich an ihm geärgert haben — beides nicht begründet, sondern etwas anderes, Objektives wäre vonnöten gewesen. Dann immer mehr und mehr ein ganz merkwürdiges SichHineinleben in die in «Geschlecht und Charakter» angeschlagenen Probleme. Er macht dann eine Reise nach Italien, notiert seine Erlebnisse auf, und sieht ganz andere Dinge, als andere Menschen in Italien sehen. Ich muß bei vielem in diesem Italienischen Tagebuche Weiningers ganz Merkwürdiges sehen. Sie wissen, ich schildere manches, was man nur in Imaginationen schildern kann: aus der atlantischen Zeit, aus der lemurischen Zeit, und wie es ausgesehen hat in Zeiten, die heute nicht mehr mit dem äußeren, auch nicht mit dem historischen Bewußtsein zu verfolgen sind. Dabei muß man gewisse Vorstellungen und Begriffe gebrauchen, um das, was man so in Begriffen schildert, vor das menschliche Bewußtsein hinzustellen. Wenn ich nun die Notizen Weiningers lese, kommt mir manches vor wie eine gelungene, künstlerische Karikatur der Wahrheit. Es ist überhaupt dieses Weininger-Leben ein merkwürdiges. Dreiundzwanzig Jahre war er alt, da trifft ihn ein Gedanke, der ihn furchtbar hypnotisiert: daß er sich selbst morden müsse, weil er sonst einen andern morden müsse, derGedanke, daß ein Mörder, ein Verbrecher in seiner Seele ruht. Eine Erscheinung, die man okkult sehr gut erklären kann. Dabei mischt sich in diesem Leben ein Großes, Exaktes gleich mit Koketterie. Er verläßt sein Elternhaus, nimmt sich ein Zimmer im Beethoven-Haus in Wien, bewohnt es eine Nacht, und am Morgen erschießt er sich.
Diese Seele hat das Eigentümliche, daß sie nie ganz mit dem Leibe verbunden war. Für den äußeren Psychiater war Weininger Hysteriker; für den, der die Sachen durchschaut, war es so, daß ein unregelmäßiger Zusammenhang zwischen seinem Geistig-Seelischen und seinem Physisch-Leiblichen vorhanden war. Was sonst normal ist, daß das Geistig-Seelische mit dem Einschlafen aus dem Physisch-Leiblichen herausgeht und mit dem Aufwachen wieder mit ihm zusammenkommt, das war bei Weininger anders. Ich könnte Ihnen die Stellen anführen, aus denen hervorgeht, wie zuzeiten das Geistig-Seelische aus dem Physisch-Leiblichen ein bißchen heraus ist, dann wieder rasch untertaucht, und im Untertauchen leuchtet ihm ein Gedanke auf, den er dann aufschreibt, oft in einer trockenen Weise; aber im Untertauchen wird er eben imaginativ und sehr merkwürdig. So erscheint dem, der die Sache durchschaut, was unregelmäßiger Zusammenhang ist des Geistig-Seelischen mit dem Physisch-Leiblichen, und in diesen unregelmäßigen Zusammenhang tritt auf merkwürdige Weise, aber in ganz besonderer Art, ein Wissen ein, das die Menschheit in der Zukunft wird haben müssen. Denken Sie sich: In einem Menschen, der ja für einen ganz grobklotzigen Psychiater Hysteriker ist, tritt ein Wissen auf, das die Menschheit in der Zukunft wird haben müssen, aber nun auch karikiert. Sie können sich nach dem, was ich heute gesagt habe, leicht vorstellen, daß durch irgendwelche Abnormitäten etwas wie Vorzügler einer Zukunft — wie es Nachzügler der Vergangenheit gibt — unter uns erscheinen, einer Zukunft, wo die Menschen werden wissen müssen von wiederholten Erdenleben, von Karma und vom Träumen des Karma. Und weil solche Menschen als Vorzügler solcher künftigen Zeiten auftreten, deshalb heilt das Wissen den Organismus nicht, sondern macht ihn krankhaft. Dann wird in einer etwas karikierten Weise mit Hilfe des krankhaften Organismus das herauskommen, was einstmals ein Wissen der Menschheit werden wird. Nehmen Sie zum Beispiel eine Stelle wie die folgende aus dem Buche «Über die letzten Dinge» von Weininger, herausgegeben von seinem Freund Rappaport: «Aus unserem Zustand vor der Geburt ist vielleicht darum keine Erinnerung möglich, weil wir so tief gesunken sind durch die Geburt: wir haben das Bewußtsein verloren, und gänzlich triebartig geboren zu werden verlangt, ohne vernünftigen Entschluß und ohne Wissen, und darum wissen wir gar nichts von dieser Vergangenheit.»
Das eine ist da klar, wenn auch das Wissen, das da aufgeleuchtet ist, karikiert ist, daß jemand dieses Wissen wieder hinschreibt, wo es ihm eine absolute Gewißheit wurde: Da bin ich durch meine Geburt durchgegangen aus einem Zustande eines geistigen Lebens, den ich vorher verbracht habe. - Wenn das jemand hingeschrieben hätte, im 10. oder 12. Jahrhundert vor Christi Geburt oder noch im Zeitalter des Origenes, so brauchte man sich nicht zu verwundern; aber in unserer Zeit schreibt einer das in seiner von Gefühlen durchtränkten Art nieder; da ist es etwas, was unmittelbar im Bewußtsein aufleuchtet, nicht etwas Theoretisiertes.
Ich könnte viele solcher Erscheinungen anführen. Was zeigen diese Erscheinungen? Nichts anderes, als daß sich dieses übersinnliche Wissen, das jetzt in die Menschennatur herein will, ankündigt; und weil es auf dem Wege anthroposophisch orientierter Geisteswissenschaft noch nicht gesucht wird, kommt es in Kataklysmen herein, kommt so herein, daß es die menschliche Natur erschüttert, sie krankhaft macht in dem Grade, wie es die Person Weiningers krank machte. Ich sage krank, wobei ich nichts Philiströses verstehe, sondern eben nur das äußerlich Tatsächliche, daß es in der Tat etwas Krankhaftes hat, wenn sich ein Mensch mit dreiundzwanzig Jahren erschießt, weil er in sich einen verborgenen Mörder findet und sich durch den Selbstmord retten will vor dem Mord.
Man könnte es an hundert, an tausend Beispielen zeigen: Dieses Wissen will herein! Und es wäre gut, wenn möglichst viele Menschen darauf kommen würden, daß es so ist. In den Unterbewußtseinen der Menschen ist ungeheuer weit verbreitet die Sehnsucht nach solchem Wissen vorhanden. Äußere Mächte, die ich öfter schon charakterisiert habe, halten das Wissen zurück. Wir müssen gar sehr berücksichtigen, was aus der Bemerkung hervorgeht, die ich am Schlusse meines Aufsatzes über Christian Rosenkrentz in der Zeitschrift «Das Reich» gemacht habe. Wir sollten berücksichtigen, was sich im 17. Jahrhundert, eigentlich schon seit dem 15. Jahrhundert, ankündigte, wenn es auch immer lauter und lauter wird. Jetzt aber muß man auf dem Wege des gewöhnlichen wissenschaftlichen Formulierens zu den Zeitgenossen darüber sprechen. Damals jedoch kam es auf die Weise, die ich im letzten «Reich» charakterisiert habe, wo ich zeigte, daß dieser Johann Valentin Andreae die «Chymische Hochzeit des Christian Rosenkreutz» niedergeschrieben hat. Nun hat das den Philologen viel Kopfzerbrechen gemacht: dieser Johann Valentin Andreae schreibt die «Chymische Hochzeit» nieder, in der eigentlich ein tiefes, okkultes Wissen verborgen ist, und nachher benimmt er sich eigentlich sehr merkwürdig. Er kommt nicht nur darauf, an gewissen Worten zu deuteln, die er gesprochen hat in bezug auf Schriften, die in der Zeit von ihm geschrieben wurden, als er die «Chymische Hochzeit» niedergeschrieben hatte, sondern er zeigt sich, trotzdem er dieses Große niedergeschrieben hat, als ein Mensch, von dem man genau angeben kann: Er versteht nichts von dem, was er geschrieben hat. Der pietistische Pastor, der nachher allerlei anderes geschrieben hat, versteht nichts von der «Chymischen Hochzeit» und auch nichts von den andern Schriften, die er gleichzeitig verfaßt hat. Er war erst siebzehn Jahre alt, als er die «Chymische Hochzeit» schrieb. Nun ist er nicht anders geworden, er ist immer gleich geblieben, nur eine ganz andere Macht hat in ihn hineingesprochen. Die Philologen zerbrechen sich die Köpfe und vergleichen allerlei Briefstellen. Seine Hand hat es niedergeschrieben, sein Körper ist dabeigesessen, aber durch seinen Menschen hat eben eine geistige Macht, die damals nicht auf der Erde inkarniert war, dies der Menschheit verkündigen wollen, in der Art, wie es damals verkündigt worden ist.
Dann kam der Dreißigjährige Krieg, der vieles von dem begraben hat, was damals in die Menschheit hereinkommen sollte. Man hätte in der Zeit des Dreißigjährigen Krieges verstehen sollen, was man nicht verstanden hat, was man gerade begraben hat. Hingeschrieben war die «Chymische Hochzeit» schon von dem, der sich äußerlich Johann Valentin Andreae geschrieben hat, 1603 war sie nachweisbar schon niedergeschrieben; man ist darauf nicht eingegangen, denn 1618 begann der Dreißigjährige Krieg. Bevor Kriege beginnen, geschehen manchmal solche Dinge. Dann ist es das Richtige, in den Zeichen der Zeit zu lesen, daß man weiß: Es muß das, was als Keim gelegt, auch Blüten und Früchte tragen!
Das gehört zu dem, was ich jetzt andeutete, was aus den Zeichen der Zeit unseres so katastrophalen Zeitalters gelesen werden muß. Davon nächste Woche weiter.
Fifteenth Lecture
Today I would like to summarize and expand on various points that have been discussed here over time, because I would like to lay the foundation for some further fundamental remarks that we intend to make here in the near future.
In spiritual scientific research, the two forms of consciousness familiar to every human being—dream consciousness and ordinary daytime consciousness, in which we live from waking to falling asleep—are joined by a third, which we call contemplative consciousness. In ordinary life, however, we know dream consciousness only as a kind of interruption of continuous consciousness. But that is only because human beings remember only a small part of their dreams. We actually dream continuously from the moment we fall asleep until we wake up, and what we usually call the content of our dream consciousness is only those parts of our entire dream experience that we remember in our waking daily life. From the standpoint of spiritual science, we must therefore say that we know three stages or three types of consciousness: dream consciousness, ordinary waking consciousness, and contemplative consciousness, to which the supersensible world is open.
Now it will be easy for you to familiarize yourself with a characteristic of each subsequent consciousness in relation to the previous one, if we start from the top, from the contemplative consciousness. Just think of dream consciousness: it gives us images. We know that dream experiences are images. If you are thoughtful, you cannot readily classify these dream experiences in the causal context of daily life. If you wanted to do so, you would mix dream life and daily life, and you would become a fantasist. So we are dealing with images in dream experiences, in contrast to reality. We call the experiences of daily life realities.
But if we now seek the relationship between ordinary daily experiences and the content of the observing consciousness, we find something very similar. For what the observing consciousness experiences as spiritual, supersensible reality is an image of what we experience in ordinary daily life from waking up to falling asleep. So insofar as human beings are in contemplative consciousness, that is, in an awakened state, they can certainly say, provided they do so with prudence: I experience a true reality in this contemplative consciousness, and compared to this reality, what is otherwise called reality is only a sum of images.
Expressed in such abstract terms, this has little value. Certainly, many people are quite satisfied when they express such things abstractly. They believe that by expressing them abstractly, they are solving the riddles of the universe. But this is not the case. Such a thing has value only if one goes into the concrete, into the immediate reality of life. But this is only possible in certain areas.
Over time, I have drawn your attention to an area that we must consider again and again if we want to make progress in the spiritual sciences. This area — the one closest to us, yet often so distant from our knowledge — is the human being itself. People usually believe that they know the physical human being; they just do not know the supersensible human being. But even that is only true to a certain extent. What we call anatomy and physiology in ordinary life is woven into countless illusions. Today, let us start, but only apparently, from the outer form of the human being: from the physical human being. Let us refer to the threefold division of the physical human being that I have mentioned many times before.
If we consider the human being in relation to the supersensible world, that is, as an image and not as a reality in the sense of conventional anatomy and physiology, he breaks down into three strictly distinct parts, also with reference to his outer physical form: the head-human being, the human being who is primarily concentrated in the head; the trunk-human being; and the extremities- or limb-human being. However, we must imagine that this third human being does not consist solely of arms and legs, but that these limbs have their “inlets” as opposed to their “outlets,” and that this is the whole human being. Let us consider these three for a moment. One could not really speak of three human beings without sinning against the reality of the supersensible, for in relation to the supersensible aspect of the human being, these three members mentioned above have a very considerable gap between them. The different forces, or, let us say, currents of force, which participate in the formation of these members of the form, go in completely different directions. When one investigates the human form with supersensible knowledge, one finds that the head is really formed in such a way that one must actually look for its formative forces before birth or conception. One must go back into the spiritual world, not into the physical stream of heredity. Just as the human head is formed—one must then, of course, go into the finer details of its formation—so everything that permeates the human soul in the spiritual world before it unites with the physical stream of heredity through birth or conception has a predominant share in this formation. And it is not so much what a person has experienced in their previous earthly life that has a major influence on the formation of the head, not in terms of its shape, but in terms of their behavior, their actions, and to some extent their feelings. When supersensible knowledge has progressed to the point where it has awakened within itself the sense for such a form, it looks from the formation of the head over into what is called the previous incarnation. There one touches upon extraordinarily significant secrets of human development. And more than is usually assumed by initiates of a lower order, the human head shape is connected with karma as it has developed from the previous incarnation.
Let us now, leaving aside the trunk man, consider the extremity man, but with his continuations inward. In this extremity man we have something that does not appear to us in such a pronounced, such an individual form as in the human head. Every human being has his individually formed head, because the head points back to previous earthly lives. With regard to the organization of the extremities, with which the sexual organization is essentially connected, the human being points to his subsequent earthly lives. Everything is still undifferentiated there. The soul correlate for this organism points to the subsequent earthly lives. It is also particularly important to consider the organization of the torso. It is an interaction of forces that play a role in human spiritual life before birth or conception and after death, i.e., between death and the next birth. What surrounded the soul between the last death and this conception or birth interacts with what will surround it between this death and the next birth or conception. This weaves itself together. And this interweaving of forces works in the human trunk organism in such a way that it becomes most evident in what is indeed the most remarkable aspect of the activity of the trunk organization: in the breathing process, so that exhalation is primarily an image—here I come to the expression “image” — of what has taken place with the soul since the last death until this conception; and inhalation is an image of what will take place in terms of forces around and within the soul between the death that will come to us after this incarnation and the next conception or birth.
Here you have something concrete in this field. What ordinary anatomy and physiology consider in the human form, they consider in such a way that they place things side by side: here the head, trunk, and limbs are in the same way a sum of nerves and blood vessels. Super-sensible knowledge must keep things apart; for it, the different parts of the body have different values. This is how ordinary anatomy and physiology see immediate realities. Our spiritual science sees in the shape of the head the image of the deeds and feelings of the previous incarnation; it sees in the exhalation, as it is individually shaped in each human being—for each has differentiated the breathing process in the same way as his head is differentiated—a picture of the forces that surrounded the soul between the last death and the next birth, and the inhalation process is also differentiated. the degree to which his head is differentiated, also differentiates the breathing process — an image of the forces that surrounded the soul between the last death and the next birth, and the inhalation process is indeed an image of what will surround the soul in terms of forces between the present death and the next birth. And in the process of the extremities we already have an image of the next earthly life. Thus, just as in dreams the daily life is interwoven with images, so the magnificently expanded supersensible life that opens itself to the seeing consciousness is interwoven with images. But these images are our given reality, given to us in waking life. We thus arrive at the conclusion that we find every subsequent world of appearances, beginning with the seeing consciousness, as images of the next appearances. Our prosaic reality is an image of the supersensible reality, and our dream reality is an image of the ordinary reality grasped in everyday life.
What I am saying here only really becomes clear to the seeing consciousness for the simple reason that what I have just mentioned cannot be found in the external form alone. Suppose someone had a low degree of clairvoyance, specifically the kind of clairvoyance in which one senses more than one comprehends with full deliberation. Then, based on their perception of the head, torso, and limbs, they could still intuitively arrive at what I have just said. Even with a low degree of clairvoyance, this would not be particularly difficult. But one would have no certainty; one would hardly be convinced if one could not critically examine it through that clairvoyance which now also grasps the corresponding states of consciousness for what I have now mentioned as the members of the human form. For this head is not only in its outer form such that it points to previous lives, but it is also such that, in relation to its soul, it is well differentiated from the other parts of the human being, but also strangely differentiated within itself. This fact is hidden from ordinary consciousness. For the latter either dreams, or during the content of everyday reality—but without realizing it—has something else for the human head, if I may use the expression: something underlying. What I mean by this is the following: in our waking consciousness, we go through our everyday experiences; we fill ourselves with the external perceptions, with the images that come to us from the senses, and with what we make of these sensory images as ideas, through the consciousness that our head conveys to us. All this is so vivid, so intense for ordinary waking consciousness that a finer consciousness, which constantly trickles beneath it — that is why I said it is underlying — a background consciousness, which does not sound as loudly as daytime consciousness, is overlooked.
Our head dreams continuously when we are awake. The significant thing is that our head has a continuous dream behind our daytime consciousness. You can already come to this continuous dreaming; you do not need to do very extensive exercises to do so. All you really need to do is try to enter that state of mental life in which you have empty consciousness, where consciousness is awake but has no perceptions and no thoughts. In ordinary life, things are such that we are either somehow directed toward the external world of perception, or we have memory images of these perceptions, or we have rising thoughts that are also connected with these memories. More often than we think, we surrender ourselves to mere waking consciousness, but we do not notice it. It is dull. But if you try to have in your soul what I would call “nothing more than waking,” nothing that comes from external perceptions or memories of them, or from thoughts of memories, if you simply try to wake, then perceptions will soon arise that are not quite properly clothed in ideas. These perceptions that arise have a dull, emotional quality. You could say they look like images, but they don't have the full weight of images. You often meet people who are in this state. They say: There is a state of mind in me in which I perceive something that I cannot describe; it is perceived, but it is not perception in the same way that one perceives the external world. It is not inaccurate when people speak in this way, and there are many more people than one might think who, once one becomes familiar with them, can communicate such things.
What arises is the weaving of this underlying consciousness of which I have spoken. And this underlying consciousness is a kind of dreaming. But what is being dreamed? It is dreamed, actually dreamed, of the previous incarnation, of the previous life on earth. Only the interpretation is difficult. But what sits in consciousness, in the head consciousness, is the dream of the previous earthly life. In this subjective way that I have described, one can already find the dream of the previous earthly life, even if the interpretation is difficult. We will talk about this later.
Thus, what I have described as the human head is also something complicated in terms of the soul, in that two consciousnesses actually run into each other: the ordinary waking consciousness and the underlying dream consciousness, which is a kind of reflection from the previous incarnation.
We can give another interesting characteristic of the soul when we consider another pole of the human being: the extremities, the limb man. This limb man is also soulful — that is, in his soul counterpart, which corresponds to him soulfully — and is actually complicated again. I have often pointed out that we sleep in relation to this limb-human being, while we are awake in relation to our head. And our will really seems to be asleep. We only have the idea of what our will is doing. When we carry out the idea, “I am moving my hand,” no one is conscious of how this is connected with the entire organic apparatus. This is as subconscious as the processes of sleep. Sleep pervades the daytime consciousness of this limb-based, extremity-based human being, in that the human will is immersed in a state of sleep.
But now the strange thing is this: when at night, during sleep, the human being is out of his physical body, that is, when the ego and the astral body have left the physical body and the etheric body, when consciousness and self-consciousness are not functioning or are functioning only dimly, then in a certain sense this extremity-man awakens. However, human beings, as they are now in their development, have no way of discovering this with their ordinary consciousness. Because they can only dimly exercise their consciousness while asleep, they cannot follow with their consciousness what the limb-man, who is asleep during the day, actually does at night when self-consciousness is not present in the physical body. It is also a kind of dreaming. This limb-man actually dreams at night. Just as the head dreams during the day under the bright consciousness of the day, so the limb-man dreams while sleeping under the dull consciousness of sleep, one might say, parallel to the dull consciousness of sleep. And what does he dream? He dreams of his next incarnation on earth. As human beings, we not only carry the past and the future within us in relation to our outer physical form, but we also carry within us, in our soul life, in the form of usually imperceptible dreams, in the form of all kinds of underlying consciousness, previous earthly lives and future earthly lives.
And the torso man. The processes of exhalation and inhalation are not clearly perceived by ordinary consciousness, but the organic functions are nevertheless closely connected with them. It is precisely these processes of exhalation and inhalation that are followed by Orientals — which is no longer appropriate for us, we must enter into contemplative consciousness in a different way — in such a way that they are raised into consciousness. The Oriental, as a seeker of the spirit, tries to dull and suppress the head consciousness and, in contrast, to stimulate and illuminate the trunk consciousness. He really tries to carry out the breathing process in such a way that consciousness arises in breathing. This is a different kind of consciousness. By following the inhaled air as it spreads throughout the organism and by following the exhaled air as it flows out and leaves the body, he raises into consciousness what otherwise remains quite unconscious. This enables him to have a very clear awareness of what the breathing process is a picture of: life in the spiritual world between death and birth. This clear knowledge, of which Westerners actually have no concept, but which is still much more widespread in the East today than one might think—which is why Easterners and Westerners often find it so difficult to understand each other—this clear awareness that there is a spiritual-soul life before birth and that a spiritual-soul life follows after death is not a theory there, but a certainty, just as it is a certainty for you when you have walked along a path somewhere, stopped, looked back, and seen the path you have traveled, and then looked back again. Just as it is a certainty for you that the path before you and the path after you contain this and that, so it is not a theory for the Oriental, not something he arrives at through association, but something he sees, but sees through his breathing process raised into consciousness: what lies before birth or conception and what lies after death.
This part of the human being, the trunk man, we might say, dreams continuously. He does not wake up completely when we are awake, nor does he fall completely asleep when we sleep. There is, however, a difference between these two states. The consciousness, the dream consciousness of this trunk man during the day is duller than his dream consciousness in the sleeping state, which is somewhat brighter; the difference is not so great, but there is nevertheless a shade of difference.
Thus we see that we are not only threefold human beings in our outer form, but also carry within us complex states of consciousness. This is what constitutes our soul life. These states of consciousness interact and reflect each other. The waking consciousness of our head gives rise primarily to what we call our life of imagination and thought; through the continuous dream consciousness of our trunk being, what we call our emotional life comes into being, and through the dream consciousness of the limb being, which sleeps during the day and is awake at night, what we call our will comes into being.
Now there is one thing left. When we consider only the outer aspect of the human being, we are not dealing merely with the visible physical organism of the human being, but we also carry within us a fine, ethereal, supersensible organism, which, in order to avoid misunderstandings, I have called the image-forming body in the more recent articles in the magazine Das Reich. This supersensible organism is less differentiated in relation to the outer physical organism; it is actually more of a unity, and it is only through coarse observation that we attribute unity to the outer form of the human being. The actual unity of the human being rests in its etheric body. This etheric body is structured just like the physical body, but not in such a way that the members lie next to each other; rather, in the etheric body, the structure must be understood as I have done recently with reference to the states of consciousness. This etheric body is also in ever-changing consciousness, in such a way that in daily life, from waking up to falling asleep, it has a different consciousness than from falling asleep to waking up. Here again, we carry something very significant within us with this supersensible body. When some theosophical theorists believe they have done something special by dividing human beings into physical body, etheric body, astral body, and so on, this is actually a kind of self-deception. It is a kind of systematization, and systematizations are never really worth anything. Insight can only be gained by examining more closely what actually goes on in this etheric body. For if one merely says, “The etheric body lives within us,” then the human being initially has only a word, deceives himself, believes he has something by imagining a mist as thin as possible, and so on. But that is self-deception. What matters is that we have something very essential in this etheric body, only human beings cannot perceive it in ordinary life. But what is always weaving and living in this etheric body in daily life, from waking up to falling asleep, is the karma from previous earthly lives, and that is what he sees. In fact, this etheric body weaves in our subconscious, and its weaving is the perception of our karma from previous incarnations. The fact that clairvoyants know something about karma is based on the fact that they learn to use the etheric body in the same way as they normally use the physical body. If one learns to use it, one cannot avoid seeing karma as a reality. For from the moment of waking until the moment of falling asleep, the etheric body is concrete, grasped as reality, in that it beholds karma, namely, from the moment of waking until the moment of falling asleep, the karma from previous earthly lives, and from the moment of falling asleep until the moment of waking, the karma that is becoming. This is again described from the clairvoyant point of view.
So we do not only dream in our hearts of what we have gone through between our last death and this birth; we do not only look at the past in this way, we also look at what it imposes on us as karma, which is seen as past karma before a spiritual eye through the function of the lower abdomen from the etheric body, beneath our ordinary consciousness. And we do not only see through our consciousness of the extremities, through inhalation, that which is connected with a subsequent incarnation, but our etheric body becomes the spiritual eye through which we see the karma that is becoming, in a way that is unconscious to ordinary life. It is not easy for people of the present day to carry out the exercises of their souls to this extent, although it is absolutely necessary for every human being to truly see everything I have just described. There are certain difficulties, which are explained in detail in the book “How to Know Higher Worlds.” This was much easier in the period corresponding to the past age of human life on Earth. For historical life is more differentiated than one thinks, and a particularly important point in the historical life of humanity, which is also characterized in my “Outline of the Secret Science” and in other writings, is when the fourth post-Atlantean cultural period replaced the third, when what we call the Greek-Latin culture began. This period is when it became so difficult for cultural humanity to penetrate into the worlds I have just described. Before that, it was relatively easier, and the Orientals retained something of this easier nature. Westerners have not retained this, which is why they cannot perform the exercises described by Easterners, but only those described, for example, in the book How to Know Higher Worlds. The age that began with the 7th and 8th centuries before the Mystery of Golgotha is already the age in which human beings were thrown more into the physical world. Another age will come again—the 3rd millennium will mark the clear beginning of this age—and it must be prepared. Something indefinable will arise from human nature in every soul; it will not be possible to interpret it unless one has knowledge of the occult sciences, unless one approaches it with spiritual science. What spiritual science must prepare and establish for the next millennium is not merely a subjective ideal or a subjective tendency, but corresponds to a necessity in human evolution. The middle of the third millennium will be a significant turning point in cultural development, because then the time will come when human nature will have reached a point where it will react unhealthily if people have not by then taken up the view of repeated lives on earth and of karma, which has been lost since the 7th or 8th century BC. Before that, human nature reacted healthily, and knowledge arose from within it. Afterwards, it will appear sickly if people do not counter it with the teaching. We can only understand our age if we realize that we are caught between two poles. One lies behind us, before the 7th and 8th centuries, before the Mystery of Golgotha. That was the time when human nature itself imparted knowledge of the supersensible experiences of the human soul. The other pole will be the third millennium, when the human soul will have to acquire supersensible knowledge in a spiritual way, just as described in the book How to Know Higher Worlds, so that the body, into which health must then radiate, does not react with illness. Our age can only be understood in its outer and inner manifestations if one can grasp this. This develops slowly and gradually, of course. And for those who do not want to dream away the most important things of their age in a dull, sleepy manner, but want to live self-consciously and alertly, it is fitting to pay attention already in our time to what wants to come into life. This will only come into full effect in the middle of the third millennium. But it wants to come in gradually, and humanity must now make everything conscious, must consciously prepare for what wants to come in. One must learn to observe life; then a superficial view will also appear in the outer manifestations — initially in the manifestations of human life — that what I have just said is true. In the crude development of the brain, which is now the norm for most of humanity, it is not easy for what must be acquired in a meaningful way, as we describe it in spiritual science, to unfold. But I would like to say that, in a tragic way, we can see what unknown forces — which I will discuss in my next lecture — actually want from humanity. There are certain sickly natures in the present, which is why I said “in a tragic way”; they are sickly for the present, but nevertheless they foreshadow many things that will affect human beings in healthier times to come.
I have often mentioned the name of a very remarkable contemporary figure who really did oscillate between health and illness throughout his life: Orzo Weininger, who wrote the remarkable book Sex and Character. Weininger is a highly peculiar individual. Imagine a person who, in his early twenties, writes his dissertation based on the first chapter of this book, a book that has been met with equal enthusiasm and irritation—neither of which is justified; something more objective would have been necessary. Then, more and more, he became completely absorbed in the problems raised in “Sex and Character.” He then took a trip to Italy, wrote down his experiences, and saw things that were completely different from what other people see in Italy. I find much of Weininger's Italian diary very strange. You know, I describe things that can only be described in the imagination: from the Atlantean era, from the Lemurian era, and what it looked like in times that can no longer be traced with the external, nor with the historical consciousness. In doing so, one must use certain ideas and concepts in order to present what one describes in terms to the human consciousness. When I read Weininger's notes, some things strike me as a successful, artistic caricature of the truth. Weininger's life is a strange one in general. He was twenty-three years old when he was struck by a thought that hypnotized him terribly: that he must kill himself, because otherwise he would have to kill someone else, the thought that a murderer, a criminal, rested in his soul. A phenomenon that can be explained very well by the occult. At the same time, something great and precise mixes with coquetry in this life. He leaves his parents' house, takes a room in Beethoven's house in Vienna, lives there for one night, and in the morning he shoots himself.
This soul has the peculiarity of never having been completely connected to the body. To the external psychiatrist, Weininger was a hysteric; to those who saw through things, there was an irregular connection between his spiritual-soul and his physical-bodily aspects. What is normal, namely that the mental and spiritual leave the physical body when we fall asleep and return to it when we wake up, was different in Weininger. I could cite passages that show how at times the mental-emotional aspect is slightly detached from the physical-corporeal aspect, then quickly submerges again, and in submerging, a thought flashes into his mind, which he then writes down, often in a dry manner; but in submerging, he becomes imaginative and very strange. Thus, to those who see through the matter, what appears to be an irregular connection between the spiritual-soul and the physical-bodily emerges, and into this irregular connection enters, in a strange way but in a very special manner, a knowledge that humanity will have to possess in the future. Just think: in a person who, to a very crude psychiatrist, is a hysteric, there appears a knowledge that humanity will have to acquire in the future, but now in a caricatured form. Based on what I have said today, you can easily imagine that through some kind of abnormality, something like the leaders of the future — just as there are the laggards of the past — will appear among us, a future in which people will need to know about repeated lives on Earth, about karma, and about dreaming of karma. And because such people appear as the advanced individuals of such future times, this knowledge does not heal the organism, but makes it sickly. Then, in a somewhat caricatured way, with the help of the sickly organism, what will one day become the knowledge of humanity will emerge. Take, for example, a passage like the following from the book “On the Last Things” by Weininger, published by his friend Rappaport: “Perhaps we have no memory of our state before birth because we have sunk so deeply through birth: we have lost consciousness, and being born completely instinctive, without rational decision and without knowledge, we know nothing of this past.”
One thing is clear, even if the knowledge that has been illuminated here is caricatured, namely that someone has written down this knowledge again where it has become an absolute certainty for him: Through my birth, I have passed from a state of spiritual life that I had previously experienced. If someone had written this in the 10th or 12th century BC or even in the age of Origen, it would not have been surprising; but in our time, someone writes this down in his emotion-filled manner; it is something that immediately flashes into consciousness, not something theorized.
I could cite many such phenomena. What do these phenomena show? Nothing other than that this supersensible knowledge, which now wants to enter human nature, is announcing itself; and because it is not yet being sought through anthroposophically oriented spiritual science, it enters in cataclysms, in such a way that it shakes human nature, making it sick to the degree that it made Weininger sick. I say sick, by which I do not mean anything philistine, but only the outward fact that there is indeed something sick in a man shooting himself at the age of twenty-three because he finds a hidden murderer within himself and wants to save himself from murder by committing suicide.
One could show this with a hundred, a thousand examples: this knowledge wants to come out! And it would be good if as many people as possible realized that this is the case. The longing for such knowledge is widespread in the subconscious of human beings. External forces, which I have often characterized, are holding back this knowledge. We must take very seriously what emerges from the remark I made at the end of my essay on Christian Rosenkrantz in the magazine Das Reich. We should take into account what was already becoming apparent in the 17th century, and indeed since the 15th century, even if it is becoming louder and louder. Now, however, we must speak about this to our contemporaries using the usual scientific terminology. At that time, however, it came about in the way I described in the last issue of Das Reich, where I showed that Johann Valentin Andreae wrote The Chymical Wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz. Now this has caused philologists a great deal of headache: this Johann Valentin Andreae writes down the “Chymical Wedding,” in which deep, occult knowledge is actually hidden, and afterwards he behaves very strangely. Not only does he fail to explain certain words he used in relation to writings he composed at the time he wrote The Chymical Wedding, but despite having written this great work, he reveals himself to be a person of whom one can say with certainty: he understands nothing of what he has written. The pietistic pastor, who later wrote all sorts of other things, understands nothing of the “Chymical Wedding” and nothing of the other writings he composed at the same time. He was only seventeen years old when he wrote the “Chymical Wedding.” Now he has not changed; he has always remained the same, only a completely different power has spoken through him. Philologists rack their brains and compare all kinds of passages from letters. His hand wrote it down, his body was there, but through him, a spiritual power that was not incarnated on earth at that time wanted to proclaim this to humanity in the way it was proclaimed at that time.
Then came the Thirty Years' War, which buried much of what was supposed to come into humanity at that time. During the Thirty Years' War, people should have understood what they did not understand, what they had just buried. The “Chymical Wedding” had already been written by the person who outwardly called himself Johann Valentin Andreae, and it can be proven that it was already written down in 1603; but no one paid any attention to it because the Thirty Years' War began in 1618. Sometimes things like this happen before wars begin. Then it is right to read the signs of the times and know that what has been sown as a seed must also bear blossoms and fruit!
This is part of what I have just hinted at, what must be read from the signs of the times of our catastrophic age. More on this next week.