Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

The Challenge of the Times
GA 186

1 December 1918, Dornach

3. The Mechanistic, Eugenic and Hygienic Aspects of the Future

What I have had in mind in the course of these reflections has been to cast light upon the form that social thinking should take today. I should like now to add something to what we have already discussed that may make it possible for you to lift these things to a higher level. This is really necessary just because of the special demands of the spirit of our epoch. Everything that I have presented to you and will still present, I hope you will consider, if I may repeat this request, not as a criticism of the existing conditions of the times, but simply to provide material suitable for giving direction to our judgment that may provide the foundation for a general survey of conditions characterized by the necessary insight. The spiritual-scientific point of view cannot be that of providing a social critique but solely that of calling attention to these things without pessimism or optimism. Yet this fact compels us, naturally, to use words that will be understood by some persons to be intended as criticism of one or another of the social classes. Such is not the case. When we speak here of the bourgeoisie, it is as if we were speaking of an inevitable historical phenomenon, and not for the purpose of raising any objection to what has simply been unavoidable according to certain spiritual-scientific points of view. I beg you to understand in the same way also what I shall present to you today.

Let us take as our point of departure the comprehensive motive force that underlies in powerful form the present social demands of the proletariat, just as it underlies all or many human movements. This force is more or less clearly expressed, but it is also instinctive, unconscious, confused, and unclear' though nonetheless fundamental in these movements. This consists in the fact that a certain ideal exists for bringing about a social order that will be satisfying in all its aspects. If we wish to describe in a radical way what is thus basic in these things, there is reason to say that an endeavor is made to think out and to realize a social order that will bring about a paradise on earth, or at least that happy state worthy of the human being that is looked upon by the proletariat population at the present time as something to be desired. This is called the “solution of the social problem.” What I have just said is inherent in the instinct behind what is called the solution of the social problem.

Now, in considering the expression “solution of the social problem,” it is necessary that the spiritual scientist, who should not surrender himself to illusions in any field but should fix his attention upon realities, shall in this case also indulge in no illusions. The essential fact in this field is that those who are striving for these things do not proceed from a standpoint free of illusions, but from a point of view confronted by a great number of such illusions, especially the fundamental illusion that it is possible to solve the social problem.

The fact that in our epoch there is no consciousness of the difference between the physical plane and the spiritual world, but the physical plane is looked upon in a certain instinctive way as the only world, is connected with the other fact that it longs to create a paradise on this physical plane. Because of this conception our epoch is compelled to believe that the human being is condemned either never to achieve justice, the harmonizing of his impulses and needs, or else to find these things within the physical earthy existence.

The physical plane, however, manifests itself to one who observes the world imaginatively, and thus takes cognizance of actual reality, in such a way that he must declare there is no perfection in this world but only imperfection. Thus, it is impossible to speak at all of an absolutely complete solution of the social problem. You may endeavor in any way you please, on the basis of all the profoundest knowledge, to solve the social problem, yet it will never be solved in the sense in which many persons expect the solution in our day. But this need not lead anyone to say that if the social problem is simply not to be solved, we should permit the old nonsense to continue on its course. The truth is that the course of things resembles the action of a pendulum: the force for the upward swing is gained in the downward swing. In other words, just as the opposite force is accumulated by the downward swing and is then used in the upward swing, such is the case also in the rhythmical succession characterizing the historic life of humanity. What you may consider for a certain epoch as the most perfect social order, or even as any social order at all, wears out when you have once brought it to realization, and leads after a certain time once more to disorder. The evolutionary life is not such that it steadily ascends, but its course consists in ebb and flow; it progresses with a wave movement. The best that you may be able to establish, when once realized on the physical plane, gives rise to conditions that lead to its own destruction after the necessary length of time. The state of humanity would be entirely different if this irrevocable law in the historic course of events were adequately recognized. It would not then be supposed possible in the absolute sense of the word to establish a paradise on earth, but people would be compelled to give attention to the cyclic law of humanity's evolution. As we exclude from consideration an absolute answer to the question, “What should be the form of social life?” we shall do the right thing by asking ourselves what must be done for our epoch? What are the exact demands of the motive forces of our fifth post-Atlantean epoch? What actually demands to be made a reality? With the consciousness that what is brought to realization will inevitably be destroyed in turn in the course of the cyclic reversals, we are compelled to see clearly that we can think socially also only in this relative way when we recognize the impelling evolutionary forces of a definite epoch. It is imperatively necessary to work in harmony with reality. We are working against reality when we suppose that we shall be able to accomplish anything by means of abstract and absolute ideals.

For the spiritual scientist, therefore, who desires to fix his attention upon reality and not illusion, the question takes the limited form of what bears the impulse within it to be brought to realization within the actual situation of the immediate present?

Our explanations of yesterday also were intended to be considered from this point of view. You interpret me quite wrongly if you suppose that I mean an absolute paradise will be brought about through the fact, let us say, that what is produced by labor will be separated from labor. On the contrary, I consider this, on the basis of the profound laws of the evolution of humanity, only as something that must necessarily occur at the present time. What is anchored in all the instincts of man, toward which the proletariat conception of life especially is striving, even if they sometimes push things to the extreme of such demands as those I enumerated to you yesterday as the demands of bolshevism—behind what people have in their consciousness there lies, of course, what they instinctively will to bring to realization. Anyone who directs his effort toward reality does not pay attention to programs proposed to him, not even that of the Russian Soviet Republic, but he endeavors to see what is still in instinctive form today behind these things that people express outwardly with stammering tongues. This is what really matters. Otherwise, if we do not view the matter thus, we shall never deal with these things in the right way. What men are instinctively striving for is absolutely inherent in the fundamental character of our fifth post-Atlantean epoch, which is essentially different from the fourth epoch, the Greco-Latin, and likewise from the preceding third, the Egypto-Chaldean. Men of today, in their social relationships—not as individuals, but in social group relationships—must will something absolutely definite.

Instinctively they do actually will this. They will today what could not have been willed in the fourth post-Atlantean epoch, or even up to the fifteenth century of our Christian era. They will today an existence worthy of the human being, that is, the fulfillment as a reflection in the social order of what they vaguely sense in this epoch as the ideal for humanity. Men will today instinctively that what the human being is in himself shall be reflected in the social structure.

During the third post-Atlantean epoch, the Egypto-Chaldean, this was different, and different likewise still earlier during the second epoch. In the second epoch, the ancient Persian, the human being was still entirely in his inner nature; man was then still a being of wholly inner nature. He did not then demand instinctively to find duplicated in the external world what he possessed inwardly as his needs. He did not need a social structure that would enable him to recognize in external things what he possessed inwardly as impulse, instincts and needs. Then came the third post-Atlantean epoch, the Egypto-Chaldean, and the human being demanded that the part of his being that was connected with his head should appear to him in the mirror of external social reality. So we observe that, from the third post-Atlantean epoch on, from the Egypto-Chaldean epoch, the endeavor was made to achieve a theocratic social arrangement in which everything pertaining to theocratic social institutions was in some way permeated by religion. The rest remained still instinctive. What was connected with the second man, the breast and breathing man, and what was connected with the metabolic man, remained instinctive. The human being did not yet think at all of seeing these reflected in the mirror of the external order. In the ancient Persian epoch there was also only an instinctive religion, guided by those initiated in Zarathustrianism. But everything that the human being developed was still inward and instinctive. He did not yet feel any need to seek things in external reflection in the social structure. He began during the period that ended approximately with the founding of the ancient Roman kingdom, the actual year was 747 B.C., to demand that what could live as though in his head should be found again in the social order.

Then came the epoch that began in the eighth century, 747 B.C., and ended in the fifteenth century A.D., the Greco-Latin epoch. Man then demanded that two members of his being, the head man and the rhythmic, breathing, breast man should be reflected externally in the social structure. What constituted the ancient theocratic order, but now only in an echo, had to be reflected. As a matter of fact, the real theocratic institutions bear a close resemblance to the third post-Atlantean epoch and this includes even the institutions of the Catholic Church. This continued, and something new was added to it that was derived especially from the Greco-Latin epoch. The external institutions of the res publica, those institutions that have to do with the administration of the external life so far as justice and injustice and such things come into consideration were added. Man now demanded as regards two members of his being that he should not only bear these within himself but should see them reflected externally as in a mirror.

For instance, you do not understand Greek culture if you do not know that the situation was such that the merely metabolic life, which is expressed externally in the economic structure, still remained instinctive, inner and without the need of external reflection. The tendency to demand an external reflection for this appeared first in the fifteenth century of the Christian era. If you study history in its reality, not in the form of legends fabricated within our so-called science of history, you will find confirmed even externally what I have told you on the basis of occult knowledge about the Greek slave class and slavery, without whose existence the Greek culture we so greatly admire would be unthinkable. This can be conceived as existing in the social structure only when we know that this whole fourth post-Atlantean epoch was dominated by the striving for an external system of institutions in the field of law and religion, but not yet for any other than an instinctive economic order.

It is our own epoch, the time that begins in the fifteenth century of the Christian era, in which the demand was first made to see the whole three-membered human being as a picture also in his external social structure.

We must, therefore, study the three-membered human being today since, for the first time, he develops a threefold instinct to have in the external structure, in the community structure, what I have mentioned to you, that is, firstly, a spiritual sphere, which has its own administration and its own structure, secondly, a sphere of administration, of security and order—a political sphere—that is likewise self-sufficing, and, thirdly, an economic sphere, because our epoch demands for the first time this economic sphere in external organization. The demand to see the human being brought to realization and pictured in the social structure arises as an instinct in our epoch. This is the deeper reason why it is no longer a mere economic instinct that is at work. The economic class that has just been created, the proletariat, strives toward the goal of setting up the economic structure externally just as consciously as the fourth post-Atlantean epoch set up the administrative structure of the system of laws, and the third post-Atlantean epoch, the Egypto-Chaldean, the theocratic structure.

This is the inner reason. Only by giving attention to this inner reason can you judge rightly the conditions of the present time, and you will then understand why I had to present to you this threefold social order a week ago. It has certainly not been invented as programs are invented today by innumerable societies, but it is asserted on the basis of those forces that can be observed if we enter into the reality of evolution. We must come to the point, for time is pressing in that direction, when the impelling evolutionary forces within the development of humanity shall really be understood concretely and objectively. Time is pressing in that direction. People still struggle against this. It is really astonishing even if we observe those who make the furthest advance. A short time ago a book was published entitled Letters of a Lady to Walther Rathenau Concerning the Transcendence of Coming Events. All sorts of things are, of course, discussed in this book. For example:

It is the intention of this pamphlet to publish the essential intuitional contents of epistolary writings. Personal communications have been excluded since they have no immediate relationship to this. The result is the elimination of the fragmentary letter form, and thus also the constant repetition of the customary salutations and conclusions. A lady endowed as a seeress communicates here to the author of the book, Of Things To Come, her unusual experience and knowledge in regard to the new soul of the time and the new birth of the world. The powers of the future struggling today for a higher form of life manifest themselves here in an individual human destiny as the experienced reality of the new soul powers.

It is strange that many things are here spoken of, but one observes something curious. The lady discovers that man can develop higher spiritual faculties and that genuine realities can be perceived only by means of these. The book really comes to an end with this. Its last chapter is entitled, Cosmic Conclusions Regarding the World Soul and the Human Soul. But the book proceeds no further than to the insight that a person can possess higher faculties and not to the point of telling what he actually perceives by means of these higher faculties. It is as if one should say to a person, “You have eyes,” but then not bring him to the point of seeing anything of reality with them. A strange attitude is taken by certain persons with reference to spiritual science. They actually shrink back in terror even if we merely begin to speak of what can be seen. One should like to say to an author such as this lady, “You admit that higher faculties may evolve in the human being. Spiritual science exists in order to report what one sees precisely in connection with important matters if these higher faculties are evolved.” But people shrink back from this and do not want to listen.

You see how urgently the time impels us to reach the point where spiritual science wills to arrive, and how meanwhile there are jumbled together in people those things of which I spoke in the latest issue of the magazine, “Das Reich,” edited by Alexander von Bernus, in my article entitled Luciferic and Ahrimanic Elements In Our Contemporary History, in the Life of Man. This is all in such a tangled mass in the human soul that even those who admit that it is possible to see a spiritual reality as a genuine reality that can be beheld regard as a fantastic person anyone who speaks concretely of such a spiritual reality.

I have referred to this lady simply because she is not a unique phenomenon. What appears in her appears in many individuals. It is actually a characteristic of the time that even though people feel impelled to look beyond the ordinary external reality, they still withdraw and refrain from doing so. In this book for example, attention is called to a certain relationship between human beings and cosmic forces. But one should not try, let us say, to explain to these people the content of my book, An Outline of Occult Science, in which these relationships are expounded. They then shrink back. But we do not gain an insight into social matters, which must be considered as I have told you, if we simply admit that it is possible to see and do not consider what can be seen. It is of enormous importance to realize this. Otherwise, we shall always make the mistake already pointed out in the first sentences I uttered today of making an absolute principle out of something that is valid concretely for the individual single case—so that the question is asked, for example, in regard to the social problem, “How must human institutions be set up throughout the world?” But this question is really not presented to us. Human beings in various parts of the earth differ from one another, and in the future this differentiation will increase. Utterly unreal thoughts are expressed by one, therefore, who supposes that it is possible to proceed socially in the same way in Russia, China, South America, Germany or France. Such a one expresses absolute thoughts where individual and relative thoughts alone correspond with reality. It is extremely important that this fact be clearly seen.

During recent years, when it was so important that these things should be understood in the appropriate places, it has been a source of great distress to me that they have simply been misunderstood. You will recall that I drew a map here two years ago that is now becoming a reality, and I did not show this map only to you. I presented the map at that time to explain how the impelling forces are moving from a certain side, since it is a law that, if we know these impelling forces, if we take cognizance of them, if we grasp them in our consciousness, they may be corrected in a certain way and given a different direction. It is important that this should be comprehended.

But no one in a responsible position has taken cognizance of these things, or taken them earnestly in the real sense of the word. Present events certainly show that they should have been taken earnestly.

Now the fact that must be taken into consideration in connection with these things is that, in regard to certain fundamental laws of world evolution, nothing is actually known in a comprehensive way such that this knowledge is brought into external application anywhere except within certain secret societies of the English-speaking peoples. This is something that it is important to observe. Secret societies among other peoples are fundamentally only a matter of empty phrases. Secret societies among the English-speaking peoples, on the contrary, are sources from which truths are acquired in certain ways by means of which things can be guided politically. I may speak of them some time, but it would take us too far afield today. Thus we may say that those forces flowing from these secret societies into the politics of the West move actually in accordance with history. They reckon with the laws of historic evolution. It is not necessary that in external matters everything shall be correct even to the dotting of the last “i”. What matters is whether the person proceeds in accordance with historic evolution in an objective sense, or whether he proceeds as a dilettante following his arbitrary notions.

The politics of Central Europe, for example, were predominantly amateur politics, utterly without relation to any historical law. The politics that were not amateurish, that followed the facts—or, if I may use the crass expression, professional politics—were those of the English-speaking peoples, the British Empire and its annex, America. This is the great difference, and this is the significant point that must be clearly seen. Its importance lies in the fact that what was known in those circles is actually flowing into the world of reality. It also flows into the instincts behind those persons who occupy positions as political representatives, even if they act only out of political instincts. Behind these are the forces to which I am now referring. You need not inquire, therefore, whether Northcliff or even Lloyd George is initiated to one degree or another into these forces. This is not what counts. The decisive question is whether or not there is a possibility that they may conduct themselves in accordance with these forces. They need to take up in their instincts alone what runs parallel with these forces. But there is such a possibility; this does happen, and these forces act in the general direction of world history. This is the essential point, and it is possible to act successfully within the interrelationships of world history only when one really takes up into one's knowledge what is going on in this manner in the world. Otherwise, the other person, who is acting knowingly in accordance with world history, or causing such action, always has the power, while the one who knows nothing of it is powerless. It is in this way that power may master powerlessness. This is an external occurrence. But the victory of power over powerlessness in these things depends, in the last analysis, upon the difference' between knowing and not knowing. It is this that must be clearly grasped.

It is important also to see that the chaos now in its initial stages in the East and in Central Europe demonstrates how terrible everything was that pretended to bring political order into this chaos but has now been swept away. But what is happening now in Central and Eastern Europe demonstrates that nothing but dilettantism permeates public life in this region. In the West, among the English-speaking population of the world, there is dominant everywhere by no means dilettantism, but—if I may be permitted to use the crass expression—an expert consideration of these things.

This is what will determine the form of the history of the coming decades. No matter what lofty ideals may be set up in Central and Eastern Europe, no matter how much good will may be manifested in one or another set of programs, nothing will be accomplished in this way if people are not able to take their departure from the motive forces that are derived in the same or even in a better way from the other side of the threshold of consciousness, just as the motive forces of the West, of the English-speaking peoples, are taken in the last analysis from the other side of the threshold of consciousness.

Those friends who have heard these things discussed that I have presented to you for years precisely as I am doing today, have always made a mistake in this connection and it is generally difficult to persuade even our best friends to abandon it. This is the mistake of thinking, “But what good does it do to say to people that one thing or another has its origin in certain secret centers of the West? Surely it is necessary to convince them first that there are such secret societies.” It has often been thought that the most important thing would be to awaken the conviction that such secret societies exist, but this is not what should receive primary consideration. You will meet with little response if you undertake to convince statesmen of the calibre of a Kuhlmann, let us say, that there are secret societies in possession of such impelling forces, but that is by no means the important point. Indeed, it is a blunder when this is considered fundamental. The fact that this is considered fundamental is due to the affectation of mystery brought over from the bad habits of the old Theosophical Society and still to be found even among anthroposophists. If anyone utters the word secret or occult and is able to refer to anything whatsoever that is secret or occult, what an altogether special distinction he thus confers upon himself! But this is not something that can produce favorable results when we are dealing with external realities. What matters is that we shall show how things occur and simply point out what anyone can understand with his sound common sense. Within those societies dealing with such occult truths as have a bearing upon reality, the principle was observed, for example, that after the Empire of the Russian Czar had been overthrown for the benefit of the Russian people, a political course would have to be pursued that would provide an opportunity to undertake socialistic experiments in Russia. People will not undertake them in Western countries because in those regions they are not considered advantageous or desirable.

So long as I simply assert that this has been stated in secret societies, it may be doubted. But, if it is pointed out that the whole direction of politics is such that this principle evidently underlies it, people are then within reality with their ordinary sound common sense. The important matter is that a feeling for reality should be awakened.

What has been developed in Russia is, fundamentally, only a realization of what has been purposed in the West. The fact that up to the present time only unskillful socialistic experiments are carried out by non-Englishmen, that things come to realization by all sorts of roundabout paths, is so well-known by these societies that they suffer no serious headaches because of them. They know that the important thing is to bring these countries to the point where socialistic experiments become unavoidable. If these are then conducted in connection with ignorance of the nature of a social order, one then actually forms the social order related to these lands and makes oneself the director of the socialistic experiment.

You see, the holding back of a certain kind of occult knowledge that is carefully practiced in these centers gives rise to enormous power. The opposite side cannot save itself in any way from this power except by acquiring this knowledge and confronting this power with it.

In this field there can be no discussion of guilt or innocence. Here we must speak simply of the inevitable, of things that must come to pass because they already exist under the surface, because they are at work in the realm of forces that are not yet phenomena. They are already forces, however, and will become phenomena.

Surely I need scarcely emphasize that I hold fast to what I have always asserted. The real being of the German people cannot perish. This real being of the German people must search for its path but it is important that it shall be able to find its path, that it shall not follow false roads in its search, and shall not search in ways where there is no knowledge. Do not interpret, therefore, what I shall now say in such a sense as to make it in the least contradictory of what I have asserted over a period of years. Things always have two sides and what I have indicated to you is, in large measure, a matter of the will. It is possible for this to be paralyzed if forces are brought into play also from the opposite side but these forces must rest upon knowledge, not upon an amateurish lack of it.

You see the essence of the thing is that if no resistance is raised from the East, and by the East I mean the whole region lying from the Rhine eastward even into Asia, British world domination will develop after the destruction of the Roman-Latin French element in the way intended by those forces that I have indicated once more today, as I have frequently done already, as lying behind the instincts. For this reason it is important that, in dealing with what Woodrow Wilson says, we shall not employ merely that kind of thinking generally developed in people today. Rather, what appears only in the instincts even in such a person as Woodrow Wilson should be grasped by means of a deeper knowledge. When formulated into all kinds of maxims, this infatuates people, and when it comes from Wilson's mind, infatuates for the sole reason that his mind is possessed in a certain way by subconscious forces.

The really important fact is that in groups in the West who keep their knowledge secret the greatest pains are taken to see that things shall develop in such a way as to insure under all circumstances the mastery of the West over the East. Whatever people may say today on the basis of their consciousness, the goal striven for is to establish a caste of masters in the West and a caste of economic slaves in the East, beginning with the Rhine and extending eastward all the way into Asia. This does not mean a caste of slaves in the ancient Greek sense, but a caste of economic slaves organized in a socialistic way to take up all sorts of impossibilities in the social structure that then shall not be applied among the English-speaking peoples. The essence of the matter is to make the English-speaking peoples into a population of masters of the world.

Now this is rightly thought out from that side in the most comprehensive sense. I now reach the proper place for the explanation of something that I beg you really to receive in full awareness of the fact that if such assertions are made today, they are made under the pressure and urgency of contemporary events and must really not be received except in an earnest sense. What I am here asserting is most carefully kept secret by the centers in the West to which I have often referred. It is considered obvious in the West that the people of the East shall not be permitted to know anything of these matters that these Western persons possess in the form of knowledge, as I have already said, through methods I may later discuss. They possess these things as knowledge in such a way that, since the others are not to know of them, world mastery shall be established through their help. This is the only possible method for attaining their ends.

Beginning with this fifth post-Atlantean epoch, definite forces will become prominent in the evolution of humanity. Human evolution is, of course, moving forward. Within the limits of the brief span of time that comes under the survey of anthropology or history in the field of external materialistic science, it is never possible to form a judgment regarding the forces manifest in the evolution of humanity. Little in the external process of development has undergone any change within this limited span of time. On the basis of this knowledge no one knows, for example, how utterly different things looked, even in the second epoch, not to mention the first or others still farther back. This can be known only through spiritual science. Only through spiritual science, likewise, is it possible to indicate the forces that will develop in future in a wholly elemental manner out of the nature of man. The fact that such forces, which will transform life on earth, will develop out of the human being is known in those secret centers. It is this that is concealed from the East by people in the West who intend to retain it themselves. It is known, moreover, that these capacities, possessed by man today only in their very first beginning, will be threefold in their nature. They will evolve out of the nature of man in the same way in which other capacities have come into existence in the course of humanity's evolution.

This threefold capacity, of which every knowing person within these secret circles speaks—these three capacities that will evolve in human nature, I must make intelligible to you in the following way. First, there are the capacities having to do with so-called material occultism. By means of this capacity—and this is precisely the ideal of British secret societies—certain social forms at present basic within the industrial system shall be set up on an entirely different foundation. Every knowing member of these secret circles is aware that, solely by means of certain capacities that are still latent but evolving in man, and with the help of the law of harmonious oscillations, machines and mechanical constructions and other things can be set in motion. A small indication is to be found in what I connected with the person of Strader in my Mystery Dramas.

These things are at present in process of development. They are guarded as secrets within those secret circles in the field of material occultism. Motors can be set in motion, into activity, by an insignificant human influence through a knowledge of the corresponding curve of oscillation. By means of this principle it will be possible to substitute merely mechanical forces for human forces in many things. The number of human beings on the earth today in actual fact is 1,400,000,000. Labor is performed however, not only by these 1,400,000,000 persons—as I once explained here—but so much labor is performed in a merely mechanical way that we say the earth is really inhabited by 2,000,000,000 persons. The others are simply machines. That is, if the work that is done by machines had to be done by people without machines, it would be necessary to have 600,000,000 more persons on the earth. If what I am now discussing with you under the name of mechanistic occultism enters into the field of practical action, which is the ideal of those secret centers, it will be possible to accomplish the work not only of 500,000,000 or 600,000,000 but of 1,080,000,000 persons. The possibility will thus come about of rendering unnecessary nine-tenths of the work of individuals within the regions of the English-speaking peoples. Mechanistic occultism will not only render it possible to do without nine-tenths of the labor still performed at present by human hands, but will give the possibility also of paralyzing every uprising attempted by the then dissatisfied masses of humanity.

The capacity to set motors in motion according to the laws of reciprocal oscillations will develop on a great scale among the English-speaking peoples. This is known in their secret circles, and is counted upon as the means whereby the mastery over the rest of the population of the earth shall be achieved even in the course of the fifth post-Atlantean epoch. Something else is known also in those circles. It is known that there are two other capacities that will likewise develop. One, which I shall venture to call the eugenic capacity, will evolve primarily among people of the East, of Russia and the Asiatic hinterland. It is also known in those secret circles of the West that this eugenic occultism will not evolve out of the inborn potentialities of the English-speaking peoples, but only of the inborn potentialities belonging precisely to the Asiatic and the Russian populations. These facts are known in the secret circles of the West. They are taken into account and are looked upon as constituting certain motive forces that must become active in future evolution.

By the eugenic capacity I mean the removal of the reproduction of human beings from the sphere of mere arbitrary impulse and accident. Among the peoples of the East there will gradually develop a brilliantly clear knowledge as to how the laws of population, the laws of peopling the earth, must run parallel with certain cosmic phenomena. From this information they will know that, if conception is brought about in accord with certain constellations of the stars, opportunities will thus be given for souls that are either good or evil in their natures to obtain access for earthly incarnation. This capacity will be acquired only by those individuals who constitute the continuation of races, the continuation in the blood stream, of the Asiatic population. They will be able simply to see in detail how what works today chaotically and arbitrarily in conception and birth can be brought into harmony with the great laws of the cosmos in individual concrete cases. Here abstract laws are of no avail. What will be acquired is a concrete single capacity in which it will be known in individual cases whether or not a conception should occur at a particular time.

This knowledge, which will make it possible to bring down from the heavens the impelling forces for the moralizing or demoralizing of the earth through the nature of man himself, this special capacity evolves as a continuation of the blood capacity in the races of the East. What evolves as a capacity there I call eugenic occultism. This is the second capacity—the capacity that will prevent the evolution of humanity as regards conception and birth from taking its course according to arbitrary impulses, and more or less accidentally. I beg you to consider the enormous social consequences, the enormous social motive forces that enter here! These capacities are latent. It is well known in those secret circles of the English-speaking peoples that these capacities will evolve among the peoples of the East. They know that they themselves will not possess these capacities within their own potentialities bestowed upon them through birth. They know that the earth could not reach its goal, could not pass over from earth to Jupiter—indeed, they know that the earth would within a relatively short time diverge from the path leading to its goal if only the forces belonging to the West should be employed. It would gradually come about that only a soulless population could evolve in the West, a population that would be as soulless as possible. This is known. For this reason these people endeavor to develop within their own circles, through their capacities, mechanistic occultism. The endeavor is also made to establish a mastery over those peoples who will develop eugenic occultism. Every instructed person in the circles of the West says, for example, “It is necessary that we rule over India for the reason that only through the continuation of what comes out of Indian bodies—when this unites with what tends in the West in a wholly different direction, in the direction of mechanistic occultism—can bodies come into existence in which souls will be able to incarnate in future who will carry the earth over to its future evolutionary stages.” The English-speaking occultists know that they cannot depend upon the bodies that come out of the fundamental character of their own people, and so they strive to possess the mastery over a people who will provide bodies with the help of which the evolution of the earth may be carried forward in the future.

The American occultists know that they can never carry over into the future what they will to carry over unless they nurture what will develop in the form of bodies for the future within the Russian population through its eugenic occult potentialities, unless they gain the mastery of this, so that a social union can gradually come into existence between their own decadent race characteristics and the germinating psychic race characteristics of European Russia.

I must speak to you also regarding a third capacity, which is latent today but which will evolve. This is what I venture to call the hygienic occult capacity. Now we have all three: the materialistic occult capacity, the eugenic occult capacity, and the hygienic occult capacity. This hygienic occult capacity is well on its way and will not be long, relatively speaking, in arriving. This capacity will come to maturity simply through the insight that human life, in its course from birth to death, progresses in a manner identical with the process of an illness. Processes of illnesses are, in other words, only special and radical transmutations of the quite ordinary, normal life process taking its course between birth and death, except that we bear within ourselves not only the forces that create illness but also those that heal. These healing forces, as every occultist knows, are precisely the same as those that are applied when a person acquires occult capacities, in which case these forces are transmuted into the forces of knowledge. The healing power innate in the human organism, when transmuted into knowledge, gives occult forms of knowledge.

Now, every knowing person in the Western circles is aware that materialistic medicine will have no basis in the future. As soon as the hygienic occult capacities evolve, a person will need no external material medicine, but the possibility will exist of treating prophylactically in a psychic way to prevent those illnesses that do not arise through karmic causes because karmic illnesses cannot be influenced. Everything in this respect will change. This seems at present like a mere fantasy, but it is actually something that will soon come about. Now, the situation is such that these three faculties will not come into existence equally among all the peoples of the earth. Indeed, you have already seen the differentiation. This differentiation has to do, naturally, only with the bodies and not with the souls, which always pass, of course, from race to race, from people to people. But with the bodies this differentiation has much to do. From the bodies of the English-speaking peoples the possibility of developing eugenic occult capacities in the future through birth can never arise. It is precisely in the West that these will be applied, but the manner in which they will be applied will be that a mastery will be established over the Eastern lands, and marriages will be brought about between people of the West and people of the East. Thus use will be made of what can be learned only from the people of the East.

The potentiality of hygienic occult capacities is present in special measure among the people of the Central countries. English-speaking people cannot acquire the hygienic occult capacities through their inborn potentialities, but they can acquire these capacities in their development in the course of time between birth and death. These can become acquired characteristics during that time. In the case of the population occupying the area approximately eastward from the Rhine and all the way into Asia, these capacities will be present on the basis of birth. The population of the Central countries cannot acquire the eugenic occult potentialities through birth, but may acquire them in the course of their lives if they become apprentices of the people of the East. It is in this way that these capacities will be distributed. The people of the East will have not the least capacity for material occultism; they will be able to receive this only when it is given to them, when it is not kept secret from them. It will always be possible to keep it secret, especially when the others are so stupid as not to believe in things that are asserted by a person who is in a position to see into them. In other words the people of the East and those of the Central countries will have to receive material occultism from the West. They will receive its benefits, its products. Hygienic occultism will develop primarily in the Central countries, and eugenic occultism in the Eastern lands. It will be necessary, however, for intercommunication to exist between people. This is something that must be taken up into the impelling forces of the social order of the future. It makes it imperative for people to see that they will be able to live in future throughout the world only as total human beings. If an American should wish to live only as an American, although he would be able to achieve the loftiest material results, he would condemn himself to the fate of never progressing beyond earthly evolution. If he should not seek social relationships with the East, he would condemn himself to being bound within the earthly sphere after a certain incarnation, haunting the sphere of the earth like a ghost. The earth would be drawn away from its cosmic connections, and all these souls would have to be like ghosts. Correspondingly, if the people of the East should not take up the materialism of the West with their eugenic occult capacities that pull down the earth, the Eastern man would lose the earth. He would be drawn into some sort of mere psychic-spiritual evolution, and he would lose the earthly evolution. The earth would sink away under him as it were, and he would not be able to possess the fruit of the earthly evolution.

Mutual confidence among men in a profound inner sense is what must come about. This is manifest through their remarkable future evolution.

Within the intelligent minds of those centers of the West, a purpose exists to foster things only in the way in which they can foster them. It is not the business of Westerners to pay particular attention to what is evolving in the East from the viewpoint of the Eastern person; what evolves among others must simply be left to those others.

This is something that must be inscribed deeply upon our souls, that we arrive at a point here where guilt or innocence or similar concepts lose their significance, where the fact to bear in mind is that we must take these things in with the utmost earnestness, in the profoundest sense of the word, for the reason that these things embody a knowledge that alone is capable of passing over into the guidance of humanity in the future.

These things are of great importance, and it is important that we should view them in a certain way. Just consider that I have told you that three kinds of occult capacities will evolve and will intertwine over the entire earth, differentiated according to different peoples, in harmony with those of the West, of the Central countries, and of the East. I have said, indeed, that they will so intertwine that the people of the West will possess the potentialities of material occultism from birth, but will be able to acquire hygienic occultism; that those of the Middle countries will possess through birth primarily the potentiality for hygienic occultism, but will be able to acquire for themselves—if it is given to them—a material occultism from the West and a eugenic from the East; that those of the East will possess from birth the potentiality for eugenic occultism, but will be able to acquire for themselves from the Middle countries hygienic occultism.

These capacities appear differentiated, distributed among the humanity of the world, but at the same time in such a way that they intertwine. Through this intertwining will the future social bond of community life be determined throughout the world. But there are hindrances against the development of these capacities. These hindrances are manifold in character, and their action is really complicated.

For example, in the case of the people of the Central countries and the Eastern lands it is an important hindrance to the evolution of these capacities, especially their evolution in a knowing way, when strong antipathies against the people of the Western countries are active within them. Then these things cannot be viewed objectively. This is a hindrance in the evolution of these capacities.

But the potentiality of developing another occult capacity is also even strengthened in a certain way if it is developed out of a certain instinct of hatred. This is a strange phenomenon. We often ask ourselves, and we are dealing here with something that must be considered quite objectively, why such senseless abuse has been practiced in the Western countries. This also comes out of the instinct tending toward these capacities. For what constitutes the profoundest impelling forces in Western occultism is fostered by nothing more powerfully than by the development of feelings that are untrue but are sensed as in some way holy, and that can represent the people of the East and especially those of the Central countries as barbarians. The potentialities of material occultism, for example, are fostered by the attitude of mind constituting the so-called crusading temperament in America. This consists in the feeling that America is called to spread over the whole earth freedom and justice and I know not what other beautiful things. Of course, the people there believe that. What I am saying here has nothing to do with fault finding. The people believe that they are engaged in a crusade, but this belief in something false constitutes a support working in a certain direction. If a person should consciously make an untrue statement, he would not have this support. For this reason, what is now happening is tremendously helpful on the one side and a hindrance on the other in the development of those capacities that we must assert to be still latent at the present time in the case of most individuals who bear within themselves the will toward evolution in the future and are destined to influence profoundly the social structure of humanity.

Just think how everything that is happening at the present time is rendered luminous and transparent with understanding and insight when you fix your attention upon those backgrounds, and realize clearly that the subconscious instincts dealt with in our reflections lie back of everything that is constantly uttered today in a conscious way.

The most important fact in this connection, however, is that it is precisely the English-speaking peoples who, by reason of quite special evolutionary processes, possess occult centers where these things are known.

It is also known what capacities they will possess in future as members of the English-speaking population, and what capacities they will lack. They know how they must arrange the social structure in order that they may be able to subject to their purposes what is deficient in them.

It is the instincts that work in the direction of such things, and these instincts have already exerted their influence. They have exerted an enormous influence, a highly significant influence.

One especially useful means that can be set in motion by Western occultism when things are to be directed into the wrong channels consists in so influencing the East that it shall continue to hold fast in future to its ancient inclination toward the development of religion alone without science. The leaders of Western secret circles will take pains to see that nothing shall exist in their own regions constituting mere religion or mere science, but that there shall be a synthesis of both, the reciprocal influence of knowledge and faith. They will also take pains to see that this science shall work only in secret, that it shall permeate, for example, only the more important affairs of humanity and the political guidance of the world through the achievement of world dominion by the British. Contrariwise, if the East refrains as completely as possible from permeating religious conceptions with science, this will be enormously helpful in the spread of this world dominion.

Now just consider how everything Russian favors precisely this Western effort. The aspiration to be pious still continues in Russia, but not an aspiration to permeate the content of this piety with a science of the spirit. The aspiration remains in a certain way within an unclear mysticism, which would constitute an excellent means for supporting the dominion over the East that is willed by the West.

From another point of view, what is undertaken is to render science, which belongs to the earth, as theistic as possible. Just here the future of the English-speaking peoples has been most fruitful in recent times. They have achieved something tremendous by spreading throughout the world, in a fundamental sense, their scientific trend, that is, science void of religion, atheistic science. This has become the ruling power over the whole earth. Goetheanism, which is the opposite of this, quite consciously its opposite, could not develop even in the country of Goethe himself. It is an almost unknown affair in Goethe's own land! The dominating intellect in science today is kept completely harmonious with what is intended to become publicly manifest as the external expression of that science practiced by those circles in secret. They are, however, practiced there as a synthesis between science and religion. Thus there is atheistic science for the external world, but for the inner circles that are to guide the course of world events there is a science that also constitutes religion, and a religion constituting science.

The East can be kept in hand best of all if a religion without science can be maintained there. The Central countries can be kept in hand best if there can be grafted upon them a science void of religion, since religion cannot be grafted upon them. These things are aided in full consciousness by those who constitute the knowing ones within the circles we have mentioned, and instinctively by the others. Since the ruling powers of the Central countries, surviving from ancient times, have been swept away, there is nothing at present in the Central countries that can be put in their place. This makes it extraordinarily difficult, too, to form a correct judgment of the whole state of things at present in its world-historical setting. The whole world has been occupied with the question of guilt and of causes in connection with this war catastrophe. But all things will be illuminated only when we consider them against the background of the effective forces that do not come to manifestation in the external phenomena. Precisely for the reasons that have been set forth today, it is not possible to form opinions in regard to these things according to the categories, the thought categories, within which judgments are generally formed when the question of guilt or innocence is raised.

I am fully aware that at the present time, when Wilson has actually been called the Pope of the twentieth century, not in a disparaging but in an approving sense on the ground that he is justifiably the lay Pope of the twentieth century—I am well aware that even in the Central countries a confused judgment will gradually develop in regard to the course of this “war,” as it is called, for the reason that the correct statements of the questions are overlooked. Every document will confirm what I am saying, but they must be viewed in the light of what underlies them. It is most of all necessary to be able to form a judgment, which cannot be reached in this case by anyone except the person who can throw some light upon these things from beyond the threshold. I fear that the events now occurring day by day, we might say, will cause increasingly false methods of judgment to become prevalent, that an increasingly small number of persons will be inclined to deal with the questions in such a way as to produce fruitful results. I suppose that people will have curious ideas when they are informed now, for example, by the press—this might or might not be true—that the abdicated German Kaiser says, “I was really not even present when the war began; I was really not present at all. This was done by Bethman and Jagow! They did this.” (You have probably read this in the most recent papers.)

It is, naturally, unheard of that such a statement has been made by this mouth, obviously unheard of! But secretly influenced judgments, which are pushed into false ways by such things, are present everywhere. You see, what it-is necessary to bear in mind in this connection is that we must really give thorough consideration to the facts in order to be able to state the right questions. If we realize this, we shall then see that we should not view so superficially as is generally done the profound, tragic necessity lying at the bottom of this catastrophe. Even the superficial events must not be viewed superficially.

I will call your attention to an instance and you will see immediately why I select such an individual detail. Some time ago I undertook to make it clear to you that many sequences of events, sequences of facts, took place in Germany that beyond doubt might really have led to the war but were then broken off and did not lead to the war, whereas what actually led to the war did not have any real connection with these other things. I will not repeat today what I have already said to you in this connection. I should like, however, to have you consider one thing in order that you may see how in the course of world history, things that serve as external symptoms coincide, we might say, whereas the great affairs of which I have spoken to you today are behind these.

The question might be raised whether the whole war catastrophe, as it has come about since July or August 1914, might under certain circumstances have taken a different course. I shall not enter at present into the question whether or not this catastrophe as such could have been avoided—we shall have to turn to another page for that—but I will raise the question whether this catastrophe might have taken a different course.

Now, it might have taken a different course. This is entirely conceivable although there is nothing more than a methodological value in such statements after the event. It is entirely conceivable, both on the basis of the events and also on the basis of the occult backgrounds, that the whole catastrophe might have taken a different course. We have to form judgments according to a series of strata. What I am saying is valid only as regards a certain stratum of the facts. Within this stratum of the facts, something like the following might be arrived at in our judgment. We might say that it is conceivable that the war might have begun in 1914 in such a way that the German army would have marched toward the East and there would have been a time of waiting to see whether a beginning of war in the East would have led likewise to war in the West. It is conceivable that the main body of the German army might have been led against Russia and a mere defensive position taken up in the West, and that the Germans would then have waited to see whether or not the French, who were not bound in such a case by any treaty, would have attacked. The French would have had no obligation imposed upon them by a treaty at that moment if there had been no declaration of war in the East but the Germans had simply waited for the Russian armies actually to attack. They would certainly have attacked; there can be no doubt that they would have attacked. I do not deny that a different hypothesis might have been valid five years earlier, pointing in a different direction, but this was no longer possible in 1914. Within this stratum of the facts it is possible to conceive that the war might have taken its main direction toward the East. This might have been possible.

Yet, as things were, it was impossible. In spite of everything, it was still actually impossible for the reason that there was no plan of campaign with reference to the East. The idea had never been conceived that the event, the casus belli, could take place in any other way than that Germany would be provoked into an attack against Russia, and that the condition attaching to the treaty between Russia and France would thus apply to France, so that Germany would have to wage a war on two fronts. Under the influence of the axiom that had taken form in the German system of strategy from the beginning of the twentieth century, every consideration began with the idea that this war on two fronts could not be conducted in any other way than offensively. The only plan of campaign existing was to force France into a separate peace by means of a sudden invasion toward the West through Belgium—this was certainly an illusion, but such illusions existed—and then to hurl the masses of the army toward the East.

Now, I beg you to consider the nature of such a plan of strategy. Every detail for every day is calculated. There is an exact calculation as to how long it is permissible to wait from the day when the Russian general mobilization occurs until the first command is given for German mobilization, which cannot then be delayed but must continue further, because the Russian general mobilization constitutes the first impetus. On the day. thereafter, the second day thereafter, and the third day thereafter, this must take place. If there is a delay for a single day after the Russian general mobilization, the entire plan is thrown into confusion and can no longer be carried out. It is this that I beg you to consider. Such a thing as this therewith took its course, which was actually decisive at a moment when there was absolutely no Central European policy. This is naturally the essential point: there was no Central European policy. For von Bethman still continues today to talk nonsense. People were in despair when Bethman uttered his most unbelievable and impossible statements in the German Reichstag, and he continues still to utter them. There was absolutely no policy, but only strategy, but a strategy developed on the basis of one perfectly definite contingent event. Here it was not possible to change anything. Here nothing could be changed even with respect to the hour.

In other words, I beg you to reflect that it was not necessary according to the external causative circumstances for anyone in Germany to wish for a war; it had to occur in any case. It was not at all necessary to wish for it. I beg you to give attention to this fact. It had to begin for the simple reason that, the moment Russia issued the order for general mobilization, the thought arose in the mind of the German Commander-in-Chief, quite automatically and inevitably, “Now I must mobilize.” From that point on, everything proceeded automatically. This by no means occurred for the reason that it had been willed. It occurred for the reason that it had been prepared years before.

The attack through Belgium against France was to follow quite automatically upon the Russian general mobilization because this was considered the only rational thing to do. The Kaiser could not be told this for the reason, as I have already related to you, that people knew he was so indiscreet that, if this were said to him today, the whole world would know it tomorrow. The fact that the attack was to be through Belgium he learned first at the actual time of mobilization. Such things as this have happened many times. I beg you to give consideration to these things, and you will then say to yourselves that it was certainly not at all necessary for anyone inside Germany to will it. The war had to occur. I say this, however, on the condition that we shall remain within this stratum of facts. You may naturally pass over to a different stratum of the facts, but there you become involved in complicated questions.

The facts are such that something great that becomes a catastrophe for humanity, reminds us of the story of the good Rector Kaltenbrunner that I related to you in connection with Hamerling. Recall how I related this to you. I said to you that, if we let our minds rest upon the poetic personality of Robert Hamerling and understand him, we shall say to ourselves that what is effective in this personality is due in great measure to the fact that he went to Trieste at a certain definite time as a teacher in a German secondary school and that he was able to go from there on vacations to Venice. In other words, that he came to the shore of the Adriatic. The whole inner structure of soul of this Hamerling is due to the fact that he was able to live in Trieste on the Adriatic, as a teacher in a secondary school. This was the only thing he could do according to the preceding course of his development. How did he happen to go there? I told you that while he was a substitute teacher in Graz, he wrote an application for a position that had become vacant in Budapest. Now, just consider this. He sent an application there. If the official had received this and approved it, Hamerling would have spent the whole ten years in Budapest. His entire poetic personality would have been eliminated; it would not have existed. Anyone who knows this personality knows that this is true. How did it come about that he did not go to Budapest, but to Trieste? The good Rector Kaltenbrunner to whom the application had first to be delivered forgot all about the matter and left the application in his desk drawer so long that the position in Budapest was filled. After the position was filled and Hamerling said, “Good Heavens! I should have been so happy to get that position in Budapest!” the good Rector Kaltenbrunner blushed and said, “Bless my soul! I completely forgot your application. It is still lying in my desk drawer.” So Hamerling was saved from going to Budapest. The next time that Hamerling applied for a position in Trieste, the good Rector Kaltenbrunner, in the light of the preceding occurrence, did not forget to pass on the application. Hamerling came to Trieste and thereby became the Hamerling. Now I ask you whether the good Rector Kaltenbrunner gave Hamerling his place in the world as a poet. Yet there is no other primary cause among the external phenomena to explain this except that Hamerling became the real Hamerling through the fact that the good Kaltenbrunner, Rector in Graz in Steiermark, blundered. The simple fact is that it is possible to get under the surface of things only when we practice symptomatology. This guides us to the correct estimate of the external phenomena and to seeing what stands behind the symptoms. This is the really important point. This is what I should like to arrive at more and more.

When we survey the catastrophe of the present time, it is by no means a simple matter to find our way out of all the confusion. Just consider the great difficulty we face. Suppose that Lord Grey should undertake to prove, on the basis of the external documents alone, that he was entirely free of blame in connection with the outbreak of the war. Of course, this is the easiest thing in the world to prove. On the basis of the external documents it is possible to present the most convincing evidence that the British Government was not in any way to blame for the outbreak of this war. But what matters in all cases is the question as to how much weight attaches to this evidence. You can get under the surface of these things only if you state the question as I have stated it here before you for a number of years. “Would it have been possible, for example, for the British Government to prevent the invasion of Belgium?” Then you must say, “Yes, it would have been able to do so.” That is just what I demanded in my Memorandum, that unadorned facts should be presented to the world. These would naturally have brought it about that the gentleman who has now deserted and gone to Holland would even then have been obliged in some way to vanish. Perhaps this has something to do with the fact that my Memorandum has received so little favorable response even in the case of those who could have formed a judgment of it. But I demanded that the events should be narrated from minute to minute—unadorned, without any coloring—the events that occurred at the same time in Berlin and in London between 4:30 Saturday afternoon—Saturday afternoon, you know, mobilization was ordered in Berlin at about 4:30, between 4:30 on Saturday afternoon and 10:30 that night. These decisive events, into which nothing enters of all those things about which the world has talked, afford the proof if they are simply narrated, that it would have been possible for the British Government to prevent the invasion of Belgium. It was not prevented. For that reason at 10:30 Saturday night, the only command to which His Majesty had aroused himself, contrary to the will of German strategy, this only command, that the army should be halted, that it should not be made to march toward the West but should be made to take a defensive position in the West—this sole order was countermanded at about 10:30 Saturday night, and the old strategy was adhered to. But the events must, then, be truly related from minute to minute, the facts merely narrated, which occurred between Saturday afternoon at 4:30 and Saturday night at approximately 10:30. From this there will then naturally result an entirely different picture. Most important of all it will lead to the correct formulation of questions.

It is to be feared that the public in all parts of the world will permit itself to be influenced by what is discovered in the archives, but the particular decisive facts that occurred between 4:30 on Saturday afternoon and 10:30 Saturday night, will probably never find their way out of the archives to the world. They have apparently never even been written down; that is, they have actually been written down but in such a way that the writings will never be found in the archives.

You see it is discretion in forming judgments that must also be attained. If this discretion in forming judgments can be gained it will be a great help toward the development of those latent capacities of which I have spoken to you today, which must develop in the future of humanity, differentiated in a threefold way in the various parts of the world. You will then discover that what I described to you a week ago as the only justifiable solution of the social problem so far as we can speak today in the sense indicated of such a solution, was by no means developed from mere intellectual ideas as an abstract program.

Dritter Vortrag

Es war mir bei diesen Betrachtungen daran gelegen, einige Streiflichter zu werfen auf die Gestalt, die das soziale Denken in der Gegenwart annehmen sollte. Ich möchte heute zu dem Betrachteten einiges hinzufügen, das Ihnen Gelegenheit geben kann, diese Dinge auf ein höheres Niveau zu rücken, was wirklich eben nach den besonderen Anforderungen des Geistes unseres Zeitalters sehr notwendig ist. Alle die Dinge, die ich vorgebracht habe, und die ich noch vorbringen werde — ich möchte dies noch einmal wiederholen -, bitte ich Sie, so zu betrachten, daß damit nicht eine Kritik der Zeit, der Verhältnisse gemeint ist, sondern daß lediglich Materialien geliefert werden sollen zur Richtung des Urteiles, Materialien, die eine Grundlage geben können, um einsichtsvoll die Verhältnisse überschauen zu können. Der geisteswissenschaftliche Gesichtspunkt kann nicht der sein, etwa eine soziale Kritik zu geben, sondern lediglich der, ohne Pessimismus und ohne Optimismus auf das hinzuweisen, was ist. Deshalb ist man ja natürlich doch immer genötigt, Worte zu gebrauchen, die von dem einen oder dem andern so aufgefaßt werden, als ob man die eine oder die andere Gesellschaftsklasse kritisieren wollte. Das ist nicht der Fall. Wenn hier von Bourgeoisie gesprochen wird, so wird so gesprochen wie eben von einer historisch notwendigen Erscheinung, nicht, daß irgendein Vorwurf gegen das erhoben werden soll, was ja von einem gewissen geisteswissenschaftlichen Gesichtspunkte aus eben einfach notwendig war. Und so bitte ich auch die Dinge aufzufassen, die ich heute vorbringen werde.

Zunächst gehen wir von dem umfassenden Impuls aus, der, wie allen oder einer großen Anzahl von menschlichen Bewegungen, so der heutigen proletarischen sozialen Forderung, mehr oder weniger ausgesprochen und auch mehr oder weniger instinktiv und unbewußt, konfus und unklar, aber doch stark zugrunde liegt. Das ist der, daß ein gewisses Ideal besteht, eine soziale Ordnung herzustellen, welche nach allen Seiten hin befriedigend ist. Man hat ja, wenn man das, was da zugrunde liegt, radikal - und deshalb eben falsch - charakterisieren will, Gelegenheit, zu sagen: Es wird versucht, eine soziale Ordnung auszudenken und zu verwirklichen, welche das Paradies auf Erden oder wenigstens allen Menschen jenen menschenwürdigen Glückszustand bringen soll, der eben in unserer Zeit von der proletarischen Bevölkerung als ein wünschenswerter angesehen wird. - «Lösung der sozialen Frage» nennt man das, und das, was ich eben gesagt habe, steckt instinktiv hinter dem, was man Lösung der sozialen Frage nennt.

Nun, mit Bezug auf diese Lösung der sozialen Frage ist es notwendig, daß der Geisteswissenschafter, der auf keinem Gebiete sich Illusionen hingeben, sondern die Wirklichkeit betrachten soll, sich auch da keinen Illusionen hingibt. Denn das ist gerade auf diesem Gebiete das Wesentliche, daß die Menschen, die diese Dinge anstreben, nicht von illusionsfreiem Standpunkte ausgehen, sondern von einem Gesichtspunkte aus, vor den sich eine große Summe von Illusionen stellt, vor allem die eine Grundillusion, daß es möglich sei, die soziale Frage zu «lösen».

Es hängt in einer gewissen Weise damit zusammen, daß unsere Zeit kein Bewußtsein hat von der Differenz zwischen dem physischen Plan und den geistigen Welten; daß diese unsere Zeit gewissermaßen instinktiv den physischen Plan für die einzige Welt ansieht und auf diesen physischen Plan das Paradies zaubern möchte. Dadurch ist sie genötigt, zu glauben, daß der Mensch entweder verurteilt ist, nirgends Gerechtigkeit, nirgends Harmonisierung seiner Triebe und Bedürfnisse zu finden, oder sie eben innerhalb des physischen Erdendaseins zu finden. Der physische Plan aber zeigt sich für denjenigen, der die Welt imaginativ betrachtet, der also auf die wahre Wirklichkeit geht, so, daß man sagen muß: Auf ihm gibt es keine Vollkommenheit, sondern nur Unvollkommenheit. — Daher ist es unmöglich, von einer restlosen Lösung der sozialen Frage überhaupt zu sprechen. Sie können, wie Sie wollen, aus allen Tiefen des Erkennens heraus die soziale Frage zu lösen versuchen, sie ist niemals in dem Sinne zu lösen, wie heute sehr viele Menschen glauben. Das aber darf nicht dazu führen, daß man sagt: Nun, wenn die soziale Frage eben nicht zu lösen ist, dann lassen wir es stehen, dann lassen wir den ganzen alten Kohl weitergehen. — Die Sache ist nämlich wie bei einem Pendel: die Kraft zum Hinaufschwung wird beim Herunterschwingen als Fallkraft gewonnen. Wie also gerade die entgegengesetzte Kraft angesammelt wird beim Herunterschwung, die dann verbraucht wird beim Hinaufschwung, so ist es in rhythmischer Folge im geschichtlichen Leben der Menschheit. Was Sie für ein gewisses Zeitalter finden können als die vollkommenste soziale Ordnung, überhaupt als irgendeine Ordnung: Wenn Sie es realisieren, so verbraucht es sich und führt nach einiger Zeit wiederum in die Unordnung hinein. Das Evolutionsleben ist nicht ein solches, daß es gleichmäßig aufsteigend ist, sondern das Evolutionsleben verläuft in Ebbe und Flut, verläuft in einer Wellenschwingung. Und durch das Beste, was Sie einrichten, wenn Sie es realisieren auf dem physischen Plan, rufen Sie Zustände hervor, welche nach der entsprechenden Zeit die Vernichtung desjenigen bewirken, was Sie eingerichtet haben. Es würde ganz anders um die Menschheit stehen, wenn man dieses unerbittliche Gesetz der Notwendigkeit im geschichtlichen Geschehen gehörig erkennen würde. Man würde dann nicht glauben, daß man im absoluten Sinne ein Paradies auf Erden begründen kann, aber man würde genötigt sein, hinzuschauen auf das zyklische Gesetz der Menschheitsevolution. Und indem man eine absolute Beantwortung der Frage: Wie soll das soziale Leben sich gestalten? - ausschließt, wird man das Richtige tun, wenn man fragt: Was muß für unser Zeitalter getan werden? Was erfordern gerade die Impulse unseres fünften nachatlantischen Zeitalters? Was will sich in Wirklichkeit umsetzen? — Indem man sich bewußt ist, daß dasjenige, was man realisiert, sich im zyklischen Umschwunge notwendigerweise wieder vernichten wird, muß man sich klar sein, daß man nur in dieser relativen Weise, indem man die Entwickelungsimpulse eines bestimmten Zeitalters erkennt, auch sozial denken kann. Man muß mit der Wirklichkeit arbeiten. Man arbeitet gegen die Wirklichkeit, wenn man glaubt, mit abstrakt-absoluten Idealen irgend etwas einrichten zu können. Für den Geisteswissenschafter, der die Realität, nicht die Illusion, ins Auge fassen will, beschränkt sich eben die Frage so: Was will sich unmittelbar in der gegenwärtigen Wirklichkeit realisieren?

Von diesem Gesichtspunkt waren auch die gestrigen Auseinandersetzungen gemeint, und Sie interpretieren mich ganz falsch, wenn Sie glauben, daß ich meine, daß ein absolutes Paradies dadurch hervorgerufen wird, daß etwa das Arbeitserträgnis von der Arbeit getrennt wird. Vielmehr betrachte ich das aus den tieferen Gesetzen der Menschheitsentwickelung heraus nur als eine Notwendigkeit, die jetzt geschehen muß. Denn hinter dem, was die Menschen im Bewußtsein haben, wonach namentlich die proletarische Lebensauffassung drängt, wenn sie auch die Dinge zuweilen in so radikale Forderungen drängt wie die, welche ich Ihnen gestern als die bolschewistischen aufgezählt habe, liegt ja dasjenige, was sie instinktiv verwirklichen wollen. Und wer auf die Wirklichkeit geht, läßt sich nicht Programme vorlegen, auch nicht das der russischen Räte-Republik, sondern er geht darauf, dasjenige anzuschauen, was heute noch instinktiv hinter diesen Dingen ist, die man äußerlich, stammelnd ausdrückt. Darauf kommt es an; sonst wird man niemals mit diesen Dingen zurechtkommen, wenn man das nicht so ansieht. Dasjenige, wonach instinktiv gestrebt wird, ist eben ganz und gar gelegen in dem Grundcharakter unseres fünften nachatlantischen Zeitraums, der sich wesentlich unterscheidet zum Beispiel von dem vorhergehenden vierten, dem griechisch-lateinischen, oder wieder von dem vorhergehenden dritten, dem ägyptisch-chaldäischen. Die Menschen müssen heute in sozialer Beziehung nicht als einzelne individuelle Wesen, sondern in sozialer Beziehung da, wo sie gruppenhaft auftreten, etwas ganz Bestimmtes wollen. Und das wollen sie auch instinktiv. Sie wollen heute, was im vierten nachatlantischen Zeitraum, was bis ins fünfzehnte Jahrhundert unserer christlichen Zeitrechnung noch nicht gewollt werden konnte, ein menschenwürdiges Dasein, das heißt, in der sozialen Ordnung widergespiegelt, eine Erfüllung desjenigen, was diesem Zeitraum als Menschheitsideal vorschwebt. Die Menschen wollen heute instinktiv, daß sich widerspiegle das, was der Mensch ist, in der sozialen Struktur.

Das war im dritten nachatlantischen, im ägyptisch-chaldäischen Zeitraum anders. Und noch anders war es vorher im zweiten. Dieser zweite Zeitraum, also der urpersische, der hatte den Menschen noch ganz in seiner Innerlichkeit; da war der Mensch noch ganz innerlich. Da forderte der Mensch instinktiv, nicht äußerlich in der Welt das wiederzuerkennen, was er innerlich als Bedürfnisse hatte; da forderte der Mensch keine soziale Struktur, die im Äußerlichen das erkennen ließ, was er innerlich als Trieb, Instinkt, als Bedürfnisse hatte. Dann kam der dritte nachatlantische Zeitraum, der ägyptisch-chaldäische. Da forderte der Mensch, daß ein Teil seines Wesens ihm im Spiegel der äußeren sozialen Wirklichkeit erscheine, nämlich dasjenige, was an das Haupt gebunden ist. Daher sehen wir, daß vom dritten nachatlantischen, vom ägyptisch-chaldäischen Zeitraum an gesucht wird theokratische soziale Einrichtung, alles dasjenige, was sich auf theokratische, auf gewissermaßen religiös durchdrungene soziale Einrichtungen bezieht. Das andere blieb noch instinktiv; dasjenige, was sich auf den zweiten Menschen, auf den Brustmenschen bezieht, auf den Atmungsmenschen, und dasjenige, was sich auf den Stoffwechselmenschen bezieht, das blieb instinktiv. Da dachte der Mensch noch nicht daran, das irgendwie im Spiegelbilde der äußeren Ordnung zu sehen. Im urpersischen Zeitraum gab es auch nur eine instinktive Religion, die von den Eingeweihten des Zarathustrismus geleitet wurde. Aber alles dasjenige, was der Mensch entwickelte, war noch innerlich instinktiv. Er hatte noch nicht das Bedürfnis, die Dinge äußerlich im Spiegelbild, in der sozialen Struktur zu sehen. Er fing an, in der Zeit, die ungefähr mit der Begründung des alten Römischen Reiches endete — 747 ist die wahre Jahreszahl vor der christlichen Zeitrechnung -, in dem Zeitraume, der dieser Jahreszahl voranging, zu fordern, daß in der sozialen Ordnung das wiedergefunden werde, was als Gedanke in seinem Kopfe leben kann.

Nun kam der Zeitraum, welcher im achten Jahrhundert, seit dem Jahr 747 in der vorchristlichen Zeit, begann und mit dem fünfzehnten nachchristlichen Jahrhundert endete, der griechisch-lateinische Zeitraum. Da forderte der Mensch, daß sich zwei Glieder seines Wesens äußerlich in der sozialen Struktur widerspiegeln: der Kopfmensch und der rhythmische oder der Atmungsmensch, der Brustmensch. Spiegeln sollte sich dasjenige, was alte theokratische Ordnung war, aber jetzt schon im Nachklang. Tatsächlich haben die eigentlich theokratischen Einrichtungen sehr große Ähnlichkeit mit dem dritten nachatlantischen Zeitraum, selbst die Einrichtungen der katholischen Kirche. Das setzt sich also fort, und neu kommt dazu das, was speziell dem griechisch-lateinischen Zeitraum entstammt: die äußeren Einrichtungen der res publica, diejenigen Einrichtungen, die sich auf die Verwaltung des äußeren Lebens beziehen, insofern Recht und Unrecht und dergleichen in Betracht kommt. Von zwei Gliedern seines Wesens fordert der Mensch, daß er sie nicht nur in sich trägt, sondern daß er sie im Spiegel äußerlich betrachten kann. Sie verstehen zum Beispiel die griechische Kultur nicht, wenn Sie nicht wissen, daß die Sache so ist, daß noch instinktiv, innerlich, bleibt, ohne daß ein äußeres Spiegelbild gefordert wird, das reine Stoffwechselleben, das sich äußerlich in der ökonomischen Struktur ausdrückt. Dafür wird noch kein äußerliches Spiegelbild verlangt. Die Tendenz, dafür ein äußeres Spiegelbild zu verlangen, tritt erst auf mit dem fünfzehnten nachchristlichen Jahrhundert. Studieren Sie die Geschichte, wie sie wirklich ist, nicht wie die Legenden sind, die fabriziert worden sind innerhalb unserer sogenannten Geschichtswissenschaft, so werden Sie das auch äußerlich bewahrheitet finden, was ich Ihnen aus okkulten Gründen mitgeteilt habe über das Sklaventum in Griechenland, ohne dessen Dasein die griechische Kultur, die wir so bewundern, undenkbar ist. Es ist als in der sozialen Struktur befindlich nur zu denken, wenn man weiß: Diesen ganzen vierten nachatlantischen Zeitraum beherrscht das Streben, außen eine Gesetzes- und religiöse Einrichtung zu haben, aber noch keine andere als eine instinktive ökonomische Ordnung.

Und erst unser Zeitraum, die Zeit, die aber erst mit dem fünfzehnten nachchristlichen Jahrhundert beginnt, fordert, den ganzen dreigliedrigen Menschen im Bilde auch in der sozialen äußeren Struktur zu sehen, in der er sich drinnen befindet.

So müssen wir heute studieren den dreigliedrigen Menschen, weil er den dreigliedrigen Instinkt entwickelt, in der äußeren Struktur, in der gesellschaftlichen Struktur das zu haben, was ich Ihnen gesagt habe: erstens ein geistiges Gebiet, das Selbstverwaltung, Selbststruktur hat; zweitens ein Verwaltungsgebiet, ein Sicherheits- und Ordnungsgebiet, ein politisches Gebiet also, das wiederum in sich selbständig ist, und drittens ein ökonomisches Gebiet; und dieses ökonomische Gebiet in äußerlicher Organisation fordert erstmals unser Zeitalter. Den Menschen verwirklicht zu sehen im Bilde der sozialen Struktur, das tritt als ein Instinkt erst in unserem Zeitalter auf. Das ist der tiefere Grund, warum nicht mehr ein bloßer ökonomischer Instinkt wirkt, sondern warum diejenige ökonomische Klasse, die erst geschaffen worden ist, das Proletariat, dahin strebt, so bewußt äußerlich die ökonomische Struktur einzurichten, wie der vierte nachatlantische Zeitraum die Verwaltungsstruktur des Gesetzeswesens, und der dritte nachatlantische Zeitraum, der ägyptisch-chaldäische, die theokratische Struktur eingerichtet hat.

Dies ist der innere Grund, meine lieben Freunde. Nur wenn Sie auf diesen inneren Grund hinschauen, können Sie die Verhältnisse in der Gegenwart richtig beurteilen. Dann werden Sie auch verstehen, warum ich Ihnen heute vor acht Tagen diese dreigliedrige soziale Ordnung vorlegen mußte. Sie ist wahrhaftig nicht erfunden, wie eben heute von unzähligen Gesellschaften Programme erfunden werden, sondern sie ist aus den Kräften heraus gesprochen, die man beobachten kann, wenn man auf die Wirklichkeit der Evolution geht. Das muß erreicht werden, daß man wirklich konkret und objektiv die Evolutionsimpulse, die in der Entwickelung der Menschheit sind, versteht. Die Zeit drängt dazu. Die Menschen sträuben sich noch dagegen. Es ist merkwürdig, wenn man selbst diejenigen betrachtet, die am weitesten gehen. Da sind erschienen vor kurzer Zeit «Briefe einer Frau an Walther Rathenau; zur Transzendenz der kommenden Dinge». In diesem Buche wird von verschiedenen Dingen schon gesprochen. So zum Beispiel: «Mit vorliegendem Heft ist die Veröffentlichung eines wesentlichen Anschauungsgehaltes brieflicher Niederschriften beabsichtigt. Die persönliche Mitteilung ward soweit ausgeschaltet, als sie . nicht damit in einem unmittelbaren Zusammenhang steht. Es ergibt sich daraus von selbst fragmentarische Briefform, darin auch die stete Wiederkehr üblicher Anrede und Abschlüsse vermieden ist. Eine seherisch veranlagte Frau spricht darin ihr ungewöhnliches Erleben und Wissen über die neue Zeitseele und das neue Weltwerden gegen den Verfasser des Buches

Nun ist es merkwürdig, daß hier schon von sehr vielen Dingen gesprochen wird, aber etwas Kurioses liegt vor: Diese Frau kommt darauf, daß der Mensch höhere geistige Fähigkeiten entwickeln und daß man durch diese erst die wahre Wirklichkeit schauen kann. Damit schließt im Grunde das Buch, dessen letztes Kapitel heißt: «Kosmische Schlußbetrachtungen über Weltenseele und Menschenseele. » Aber es kommt nicht weiter als bis zur Einsicht, daß der Mensch gewisse höhere Fähigkeiten haben kann; aber ja nicht bis dahin, was man nun sieht mit diesen höheren Fähigkeiten. Es ist so, wie wenn man dem Menschen dozieren würde: Du hast Augen, - aber ihn nicht dazu kommen ließe, irgend etwas von der Wirklichkeit mit diesen Augen zu sehen. Es ist merkwürdig, wie von gewissen Leuten die Stellung zur Geisteswissenschaft heute genommen wird. Sie schrecken geradezu davor zurück, wenn man beginnt, davon zu sprechen, was nun gesehen werden kann. Man möchte solch einer Verfasserin sagen: Du gibst zu, höhere Fähigkeiten können sich im Menschen entwickeln. Geisteswissenschaft ist dazu da, um zu sagen, was man dann gerade in wichtigen Dingen sieht, wenn diese höheren Fähigkeiten entwickelt werden. - Aber davor zucken die Leute zurück, das mögen sie noch nicht hören.

Sie sehen, wie sehr die Zeit danach drängt, gerade dahin zu kommen, wo Geisteswissenschaft hinwill, und wie gleichzeitig im Menschen sich zusammenschoppen die Dinge, von denen ich im letzten Aufsatz des Bernus’schen «Reiches » gesprochen habe in meinem Aufsatz: «Luziferisches und Ahrimanisches in ihrem Verhältnis zum Menschen.» Das schoppt sich so zusammen in der Menschenseele, daß selbst diejenigen, die zugeben, man könne eine geistige Wirklichkeit schauen, denjenigen heute noch für einen Phantasten anschauen, der nun von dieser geistigen Wirklichkeit spricht, von der sie selber zugeben, daß sie die wahre Wirklichkeit ist, daß man sie schauen kann.

Ich habe diese Dame erwähnt, weil sie nicht eine einzelne Erscheinung ist, sondern weil das, was in ihr auftritt, in vielen Fällen auftritt, weil gerade das charakteristisch ist, daß die Menschen dazu gedrängt werden, hinauszuschauen über die gewöhnliche äußere Wirklichkeit, aber es doch nicht wollen, es nicht tun. Es wird da hingewiesen zum Beispiel in diesem Buche, wie der Mensch eine gewisse Verwandtschaft hat mit kosmischen Kräften. Aber man soll nur ja nicht etwa kommen und den Inhalt meiner «Geheimwissenschaft», in dem diese Beziehungen entwickelt werden, den Leuten vortragen! Da zucken sie davor zurück. Man kommt aber nicht zu einer Einsicht gerade in die sozialen Dinge, die so betrachtet werden müssen, wie ich es Ihnen gesagt habe, wenn man nur sich darauf einläßt, daß geschaut werden kann, und nicht darauf sich einläßt, was geschaut werden kann. Das ist von einer ungeheuren Wichtigkeit, dieses wirklich einzusehen. Sonst wird man immer in den Fehler verfallen, der schon angedeutet wurde bei dem allerersten heute gesprochenen Satze, daß man dasjenige, was konkret für das individuelle einzelne gilt, verabsolutiert, daß man frägt zum Beispiel mit Bezug auf die soziale Frage: Wie sollen die menschlichen Einrichtungen über die ganze Erde hin getroffen werden? — Aber diese Frage ist gar nicht gegeben. Die Menschen sind über die Erde hin verschieden. Und gerade gegen die Zukunft hin wird sich diese Verschiedenheit trotz allem Internationalismus immer mehr und mehr zeigen. Und die Folge wird sein, daß derjenige einen ganz unwirklichen Gedanken ausspricht, der da glaubt, man könne in Rußland geradeso wie in China, geradeso wie in Südamerika, in Deutschland oder wie in Frankreich sozialisieren, der also absolute Gedanken da ausspricht, wo individuelle, relative Gedanken allein der Wirklichkeit entsprechen. Das ist außerordentlich wichtig, daß man dieses ins Auge faßt.

Es war mein großer Schmerz in den letzten Jahren, wo es so notwendig gewesen wäre, daß diese Dinge an den geeigneten Orten verstanden worden wären, daß diese Dinge eben nicht verstanden worden sind. Sie erinnern sich, ich habe vor zwei Jahren hier eine Karte aufgezeichnet, die sich jetzt realisiert. Und diese Karte habe ich nicht nur Ihnen aufgezeichnet. Ich habe diese Karte dazumal angeben wollen, um auszusprechen, wie die Impulse von einer gewissen Seite her gehen, weil es ein Gesetz ist, daß, wenn man diese Impulse kennt, wenn man sich einläßt darauf, wenn man sie ins Bewußtsein aufnimmt, sie in einer gewissen Weise korrigiert, sie in anderes gelenkt werden können. Das ist sehr wichtig, daß man dies erfaßt. Aber es hat sich eben niemand gefunden, auf den es angekommen wäre, der sich auf diese Dinge eingelassen hätte, der diese Dinge in wirklichem Sinne ernst genommen hätte. Daß sie ernst zu nehmen waren, das zeigen ja die heutigen Geschehnisse.

Die Tatsache, die dabei berücksichtigt werden muß, ist die, daß von gewissen Grundgesetzen der Weltevolution heute tatsächlich in größerem Umfange und so, daß dieses Wissen auch äußerlich betätigt wird, nur etwas gewußt wird innerhalb gewisser geheimer Gesellschaften der britisch sprechenden Bevölkerung. Dies ist etwas, was wichtig ist zu berücksichtigen. Geheime Gesellschaften bei den andern Bevölkerungen sind im Grunde genommen nur Phrasengeklingel. Geheime Gesellschaften dagegen innerhalb der britisch sprechenden Bevölkerung sind Quellen, von welchen aus durch gewisse Methoden, über die ich ja vielleicht auch einmal sprechen werde, was aber heute zu weit führen würde, Wahrheiten gewonnen werden, nach denen man die Dinge politisch lenken kann. So daß man sagen kann: Jene Kräfte, welche einfließen von diesen geheimen Gesellschaften in die Politik des Westens, gehen mit der Geschichte in sachgemäßem Sinne. Sie rechnen mit den Gesetzen der historischen Entwickelung. Es braucht nicht im Äußeren immer bis aufs i-Tüpfelchen alles zu stimmen, es handelt sich darum, ob man mit den Gesetzen der historischen Entwickelung in sachgemäßem Sinne geht, oder ob man dilettantisch vorgeht, bloß nach willkürlichen Einfällen.

Im eminentesten Sinne eine dilettantische Politik, die gottverlassen von allen historischen Gesetzen ist, war zum Beispiel die mitteleuropäische Politik. Eine nicht dilettantische, eine sachgemäße oder, wenn ich mich des Spießerausdrucks bedienen darf, eine fachliche Politik war die Politik der britisch sprechenden Bevölkerung, des britischen Reiches und seines Anhanges Amerika. Das ist der große Unterschied, das ist das Bedeutsame, das ins Auge gefaßt werden muß. Es ist aus dem Grunde bedeutsam, weil das, was in jenen Kreisen gewußt wird, schon in die Wirklichkeit hineinfließt. Es fließt auch in die Instinkte derjenigen Menschen hinein, die dann äußerlich auf ihrem Platze stehen und die Repräsentativpolitiker sind, wenn sie auch nur aus politischen Instinkten heraus handeln. Hinter ihnen stehen die Kräfte, von denen ich eben Andeutung mache. Sie brauchen daher nicht zu fragen, ob Northcliffe oder selbst Lloyd George in diesem oder jenem Grade in die Kräfte, um die es sich handelt, eingeweiht sind. Darauf kommt es gar nicht an, sondern darauf, ob es eine Möglichkeit gibt, daß sie im Sinne dieser Kräfte sich verhalten. Sie brauchen das, was in der Richtung ihrer Kräfte liegt, nur in ihre Instinkte aufzunehmen. Das gibt es aber; das geschieht. Und diese Kräfte wirken in der Richtung der Weltgeschichte. Das ist das Wesentliche. Und man kann günstig im weltgeschichtlichen Zusammenhange nur wirken, wenn man wirklich wissentlich aufnimmt, was in dieser Weise in der Welt vorgeht. Sonst hat der andere, der wissentlich im Sinne der Weltgeschichte wirkt oder wirken läßt, immer die Macht, und derjenige, der nichts weiß, die Ohnmacht. Solcherweise kann die Macht über die Ohnmacht siegen. Das ist ein äußeres Geschehnis. Aber der Sieg der Macht über die Ohnmacht geht letzten Endes in diesen Dingen auf den Unterschied von Wissen und Nichtwissen zurück. Das ist es, was ins Auge gefaßt werden muß.

Und wichtig ist es, daß jenes Chaos, das sich im Osten und in Mitteleuropa jetzt vorbereitet, auf der einen Seite ja zeigt, wie schrecklich alles das war, was vorgab, in dieses Chaos staatliche Ordnung hineinzubringen, und was jetzt hinweggefegt ist; aber auf der anderen Seite zeigt dasjenige, was in Mittel- und Osteuropa geschieht, daß eben Dilettantismus auf diesem Gebiete das öffentliche Leben durchsetzt. Im Westen, in der englisch sprechenden Bevölkerung der Erde, herrscht gar nicht Dilettantismus, herrscht überall — wie gesagt, wenn ich mich des Spießerausdrucks bedienen darf — fachmännische Betrachtung dieser Dinge.

Das ist es aber, was der Geschichte der nächsten Jahrzehnte seine Gestalt geben wird. Man mag noch so hehre Ideale aufstellen in Mittel- und Osteuropa, man mag noch so guten Willen haben in diesen oder jenen Programmen, mit alledem ist nichts getan, solange man nicht von Impulsen auszugehen vermag, die ebenso oder besser von jenseits der Schwelle des Bewußtseins hergenommen sind, wie letzten Endes die Impulse des Westens, der britisch sprechenden Bevölkerung von jenseits der Schwelle des Bewußtseins hergenommen werden.

Die Freunde, die wenigstens auf die Dinge gehört haben, wie ich sie seit Jahren, ebenso wie heute vor Ihnen, vorgebracht habe, haben immer bei diesen Dingen einen Fehler gemacht, von dem in der Regel auch unsere besten Freunde schwer abzubringen sind, den Fehler, der etwa von dem Gedanken ausgeht: Ja, was nützt es denn, wenn man den Leuten auch sagt, aus gewissen geheimen Zentren des Westens gehen diese oder jene Dinge aus; man muß ihnen doch erst den Glauben beibringen können, daß es solche Geheimgesellschaften gibt! Das wurde vielfach als das Fundamentale betrachtet, diesen Glauben zu erwecken, daß es solche geheime Gesellschaften gibt. Das ist aber nicht das, worauf man in erster Linie sehen sollte. Sie werden wenig Entgegenkommen finden, wenn Sie etwa einem Staatsmann vom Kaliber eines Kühlmann beibringen wollen, daß es Geheimgesellschaften gibt, die solche Impulse haben. Aber darauf kommt es gar nicht an. Man macht sogar einen Fehler, wenn man das als das Fundamentale ansieht. Daß man davon als von einem Fundamentalen ausgeht, rührt nur her von der ja auch bei Anthroposophen vorhandenen, noch aus den Unsitten der alten Theosophischen Gesellschaft heraufgetragenen Geheimniskrämerei. Man meint, wenn man das Wort geheim oder okkult ausspricht und auf irgend etwas Geheimes oder Okkultes hinweisen kann, da gibt man sich schon ein ganz besonderes Ansehen dadurch. Das ist es aber nicht, was irgendwie günstig wirkt, wenn es sich um die äußere Wirklichkeit handelt. Darum handelt es sich, daß man aufzeigt, wie die Dinge geschehen, daß man einfach auf das, was jeder mit seinem gesunden Menschenverstand verstehen kann, hinweist.

Innerhalb jener Gesellschaften, die solche okkulten Wahrheiten, die auf die Wirklichkeit gehen, pflegten, wurde zum Beispiel der Satz ausgesprochen: Man muß eine solche Politik befolgen, daß, nachdem das russische Zarenreich zum Heile des russischen Volkes gestürzt sein wird, in Rußland die Möglichkeit geboten wird, sozialistische Experimente zu unternehmen, die man in westlichen Ländern nicht unternehmen will, weil sie sich da nicht als vorteilhaft, nicht als wünschenswert herausstellen würden. — Solange ich sagen, daß das in geheimen Gesellschaften gesagt worden ist, kann man es ja bezweifeln. Aber wenn man dann darauf hinweist, daß die ganze politische Leitung so verläuft, daß dieser Satz zugrunde liegt, dann steht man mit dem gewöhnlichen gesunden Menschenverstand in der Wirklichkeit drinnen, und darum handelt es sich, daß man Wirklichkeitssinn erwecke.

Was sich da in Rußland entwickelt hat, ist im Grunde genommen nur eine Realisierung desjenigen, was im Westen gewollt ist. Daß heute noch ungeschickte sozialistische Experimente von Nichtengländern gemacht werden, daß sich die Dinge in allerlei Windungen realisieren, das wissen diese Gesellschaften so gut, daß ihnen das nicht besonderen Kopfschmerz macht; denn sie wissen eben, es handelt sich darum, daß man diese Länder zunächst so weit bringt, daß sozialistische Experimente notwendig sind. — Erhält man sie dann bei dem Nichtwissen über eine soziale Ordnung, dann macht man die soziale Ordnung bei ihnen, dann macht man sich zum Regierer der sozialistischen Experimente.

Sie sehen, in dem Vorenthalten einer gewissen Art von okkultem Wissen, das sehr sorgfältig gerade in diesen Zentren gepflegt wird, liegt eine ungeheure Macht. Und keine Rettung gibt es gegen diese Macht, als indem das Wissen von der anderen Seite erworben wird und entgegengehalten werden kann. Auf diesem Gebiete redet man nicht von Schuld oder Unschuld, auf diesem Gebiete redet man eben einfach von Notwendigkeiten, von den Dingen, die da kommen müssen, weil sie jetzt schon in den Untergründen, in der Region der Kräfte, die noch nicht Phänomene sind, aber die schon Kräfte sind und zu Phänomenen werden, wirksam sind.

Ich brauche wohl kaum zu betonen, daß ich das festhalte, was ich immer ausgesprochen habe: daß das eigentliche Wesen des deutschen Volkstums nicht untergehen kann. Dieses eigentliche Wesen des deutschen Volkstumes muß sich seinen Weg suchen. Aber eben darum handelt es sich, daß es den Weg finden kann, daß es nicht auf falschen Wegen sucht, nicht auf unwissenden Wegen sucht. Also deuten Sie das, was ich jetzt sagen werde, nicht etwa in dem Sinne, daß es irgendwie widersprechen würde dem, was ich im Laufe der Jahre gesagt habe; denn die Dinge haben alle zwei Seiten, und das, was ich angedeutet habe, ist in vieler Beziehung ein Wollen. Es kann ja paralysiert werden, wenn von der anderen Seite auch Kräfte spielen; die aber müssen auf Wissen beruhen, nicht auf dilettantischer Unwissenheit.

Sehen Sie, worauf es ankommt, das ist dieses: Wenn vom Osten aus - und mit dem Osten meine ich alles dasjenige, was vom Rhein nach Osten liegt bis nach Asien hinüber — kein Widerstand erhoben wird, so wird eben die britische Weltherrschaft sich mit dem Untergange des romanisch-lateinischen Franzosenelementes so entwickeln, wie es in den Intentionen jener Kräfte liegt, die ich heute wiederum und schon öfter als hinter den Instinkten gelegen bezeichnet habe. Hinter den Instinkten liegen sie. Es ist daher wichtig, nicht bloß mit dem heute vielfach den Menschen anerzogenen Denken sich an das zu machen, was Woodrow Wilson sagt, sondern es ist wichtig, daß man mit einem tieferen Wissen erfaßt, was selbst in solchen Menschen wie Woodrow Wilson nur an Instinkten zutage tritt, was dann in allerlei Sätzen formuliert die Menschen berückt, was aber doch nur dadurch aus der betreffenden Seele kommt, daß diese Seele in einer gewissen Weise von unterbewußten Kräften besessen ist.

Um was es sich handelt, ist doch, daß in den ihr Wissen geheimhaltenden Zirkeln des Westens sehr darauf gesehen wird, daß gewisse Dinge sich so herausbilden, daß dieser Westen unter allen Umständen über den Osten die Herrschaft erwirbt. Mögen die Leute heute in ihrem Bewußtsein sagen, was sie wollen, dasjenige, was angestrebt wird, ist, eine Herrenkaste des Westens zu begründen und eine wirtschaftliche Sklavenkaste des Ostens, die beim Rhein beginnt und weiter nach Osten bis nach Asien hinein geht. Nicht eine Sklavenkaste im alten griechischen Sinne, aber eine ökonomische Sklavenkaste, eine Sklavenkaste, welche sozialistisch organisiert werden soll, welche alle Unmöglichkeiten einer sozialen Struktur aufnehmen soll, die aber dann nicht angewendet werden soll auf die englisch sprechende Bevölkerung. Darum handelt es sich, die englisch sprechende Bevölkerung zu einer Herrenbevölkerung der Erde zu machen.

Nun, richtig gedacht ist dieses von jener Seite in allerumfänglichstem Sinne. Und ich komme dazu, jetzt etwas auseinanderzusetzen, was ich Sie bitte, wirklich so aufzunehmen, daß Sie sich bewußt sind: Wenn solche Dinge heute ausgesprochen werden, so werden sie eben unter dem Druck und Drang der Zeitereignisse ausgesprochen und dürfen wahrhaftig nicht in unernstem Sinne genommen werden. Was ich da ausspreche, wird von den Zentren im Westen, die ich öfter angedeutet habe, sorgfältigst geheim gehalten. Und es gilt im Westen als selbstverständlich, daß man die Menschen des Ostens nichts wissen läßt von diesen Dingen, die man selbst, wie ich vorhin sagte, durch Methoden, über die ich vielleicht auch noch sprechen werde, als Wissen besitzt, und zwar so als Wissen besitzt, daß man, weil die anderen diese Dinge nicht wissen sollen — und das ist die einzige Art, auf die es sein kann -, mit ihrer Hilfe die Weltherrschaft begründen will.

Sehen Sie, von diesem fünften nachatlantischen Zeitraum ab werden sich in der Evolution der Menschheit ganz bestimmte Kräfte erheben. Die Menschheit entwickelt sich ja vorwärts. Man kann niemals von dem kleinen Zeitraum, den man anthropologisch oder historisch in der äußeren materialistischen Wissenschaft überschaut, ein Urteil gewinnen über die Kräfte, die sich in der Menschheitsevolution ergeben. Denn in diesem kleinen Zeitraum, den man anthropologisch oder historisch in dem äußeren Werden überschaut, hat sich eben nur sehr wenig geändert. Mit dieser Wissenschaft weiß man nicht, wie es zum Beispiel ganz anders ausgesehen hat schon im zweiten oder geschweige denn im ersten Zeitraum oder noch weiter zurück. Das kann man nur mit Geisteswissenschaft wissen. Und so kann man auch nur mit Geisteswissenschaft hindeuten auf diejenigen Kräfte, welche sich in Zukunft aus der Menschennatur selbst auf ganz elementare Weise herausentwickeln. Daß solche Kräfte, die das Leben der Erde umgestalten werden, sich entwickeln werden aus dem Menschen heraus, das weiß man in jenen geheimen Zentren. Das ist dasjenige, was man dem Osten verschweigen will, was man als ein Wissen für sich behalten will. Und man weiß auch, daß von dreifacher Art diese Fähigkeiten sein werden, die der Mensch heute erst in den allerersten Anfängen hat. Sie werden sich so aus der Menschennatur herausentwickeln, wie sich im Laufe der Menschheitsevolution andere Fähigkeiten ergeben haben.

Ich muß Ihnen diese dreifache Fähigkeit, von der jeder Wissende innerhalb dieser geheimen Zirkel spricht und die sich in der Menschennatur entwickeln werden, in folgender Weise plausibel machen. Erstens sind es die Fähigkeiten zum sogenannten materiellen Okkultismus. Durch diese Fähigkeit —- und das ist gerade das Ideal der britischen Geheimgesellschaften - sollen gewisse, heute der Industrialisierung zugrunde liegende soziale Formen auf eine ganz andere Grundlage gestellt werden. Es weiß jedes wissende Mitglied dieser geheimen Zirkel, daß man einfach durch gewisse Fähigkeiten, die heute noch beim Menschen latent sind, die sich aber entwickeln, mit Hilfe des Gesetzes der zusammenklingenden Schwingungen in großem Umfange Maschinen und maschinelle Einrichtungen und anderes in Bewegung setzen kann. Eine kleine Andeutung finden Sie in dem, was ich in meinen Mysteriendramen an die Person des Strader geknüpft habe.

Diese Dinge sind heute im Werden. Diese Dinge werden innerhalb jener geheimen Zirkel auf dem Gebiete des materiellen Okkultismus als ein Geheimnis gehütet. Motoren gibt es, welche dadurch, daß man die betreffende Schwingungskurve kennt, durch sehr geringfügige menschliche Beeinflussung in Tätigkeit, in Betrieb gesetzt werden können. Dadurch wird es möglich sein, vieles, wozu man heute Menschenkräfte braucht, durch rein mechanische Kräfte zu ersetzen. Heute ist es schon so, daß die Menschen auf der Erde vierzehnhundert Millionen sind; aber es wird nicht bloß Arbeit geleistet von diesen vierzehnhundert Millionen - ich habe das einmal hier ausgeführt -, sondern es wird so viel Arbeit geleistet auf rein mechanische Weise, daß man sagen kann, die Erde ist heute eigentlich von zweitausend Millionen Menschen bevölkert; die anderen sind eben einfach Maschinen; das heißt, würde die Arbeit, welche von Maschinen geleistet wird, durch Menschen geleistet werden müssen ohne Maschinen, so müßten sechshundert Millionen mehr Menschen auf der Erde leben. Aber man wird, wenn das, was ich jetzt vor Ihnen mechanischen Okkultismus nenne, in das Gebiet der praktischen Wirksamkeit tritt, was ein Ideal jener geheimen Zentren ist, man wird nicht nur für fünf- oder sechshundert Millionen Menschen Arbeit leisten können, sondern man wird für tausend und mehr Millionen Menschen Arbeit leisten können.

Dadurch wird die Möglichkeit gegeben sein, daß innerhalb des Gebietes der englisch sprechenden Bevölkerung neun Zehntel der Menschenarbeit unnötig wird. Aber der mechanische Okkultismus macht möglich nicht nur, daß man neun Zehntel der Arbeit, die heute noch von Menschenhänden geleistet wird, entbehren kann, sondern er macht es auch möglich, daß man jede aufständische Bewegung der dann unbefriedigten Menschenmasse paralysieren kann. Die Fähigkeit, nach dem Gesetze der ineinanderklingenden Schwingungen Motoren in Bewegung zu setzen, diese Fähigkeit wird sich gerade in ausgiebigem Maße bei der britisch sprechenden Bevölkerung entwickeln. Das weiß man in jenen geheimen Zirkeln. Damit rechnet man als mit demjenigen, was einem noch im Laufe des fünften nachatlantischen Zeitraums die Übermacht über die übrige Erdenbevölkerung geben wird.

Aber man weiß in jenen Kreisen noch etwas anderes. Man weiß, daß es zwei andere Fähigkeiten gibt, die sich auch entwickeln werden. Und eine Fähigkeit wird sich entwickeln, die ich nennen möchte die eugenetische Fähigkeit. Und diese eugenetische Fähigkeit wird sich vorzüglich entwickeln bei den Menschen des Ostens, bei den Menschen Rußlands und des asiatischen Hinterlandes. Und auch das weiß man in jenen geheimen Zirkeln des Westens, daß dieser eugenetische Okkultismus sich nicht aus den angeborenen Anlagen der britisch sprechenden Bevölkerung heraus entwickeln wird, sondern aus den angeborenen Anlagen gerade der asiatischen und russischen Bevölketung. Man kennt diese Tatsachen in den geheimen Zirkeln des Westens, und man rechnet damit. Man zählt mit ihnen als mit gewissen Impulsen, welche in der Entwickelung der Zukunft tätig sein müssen. Eugenetische Fähigkeit nenne ich die Heraushebung der Menschenfortpflanzung aus der bloßen Willkür und dem Zufall. Innerhalb der Bevölkerung des Ostens wird sich nämlich ein instinktiv helles Wissen entwickeln, welches Kenntnis davon haben wird, wie mit gewissen kosmischen Erscheinungen parallel laufen müssen die Gesetze der Population, die Gesetze der Bevölkerung; wie man, wenn man im Einklange mit gewissen Sternkonstellationen die Empfängnis einrichtet, dadurch Veranlassung gibt, gut gearteten oder übel gearteten Seelen den Zugang zur Erdenverkörperung zu verschaffen. Nur diejenigen Menschen, welche die Rassenfortsetzung, die Blutsfortsetzung der asiatischen Bevölkerung bilden, werden die Fähigkeit erlangen können, einfach im einzelnen zu schauen, wie das, was heute chaotisch, nach Willkür, über die Erde hin wirkt - Konzeption, Geburt -, im Einklange mit den großen Gesetzen des Kosmos im einzelnen, konkreten Falle zu machen ist. Da nützen nämlich abstrakte Gesetze nichts, sondern was da erworben wird, ist eine konkrete Fähigkeit, die im einzelnen Falle wissen wird: jetzt darf eine Konzeption sein oder jetzt darf keine Konzeption sein.

Dieses Wissen, welches in der Lage sein wird, vom Himmel herunter die Impulse zu holen für Moralisierung oder Demoralisierung der Erde durch die Natur des Menschen selbst, diese besondere Fähigkeit entwickelt sich als eine Fortsetzung der Blutsfähigkeit bei den Rassen des Ostens, und ich nenne das, was da als Fähigkeit sich entwickelt, eugenetischen Okkultismus. Das ist die zweite Fähigkeit, welche verhindern wird, daß die Evolution der Menschheit mit Bezug auf Konzeption und Geburt bloß nach Willkür, mehr oder weniger durch Zufall in der Welt verläuft. Und jetzt sehen Sie auf die ungeheuere soziale Folge, auf den ungeheueren sozialen Impuls, der damit hereinkommt! Diese Fähigkeiten sind latent. Man weiß gut in jenen geheimen Zirkeln der britisch sprechenden Bevölkerung, daß diese Fähigkeiten sich bei der Bevölkerung des Ostens entwickeln werden. Man weiß, daß man sie selber in seinen durch die Geburt vermittelten Anlagen nicht haben wird. Man weiß, daß die Erde ihr Ziel nicht erreichen könnte, nicht von der Erde zum Jupiter hinüberkommen könnte, ja daß sogar schon verhältnismäßig bald die Erde von ihrem Ziele sich abwenden würde, wenn nur mit den Kräften des Westens gearbeitet würde. Wenn nur mit den mechanischen okkulten Fähigkeiten des Westens gearbeitet würde, dann würde allmählich eine seelenlose Bevölkerung im Westen sich allein entwickeln können, eine Bevölkerung, welche so seelenlos wie möglich werden würde. Das weiß man. Daher strebt man an, innerhalb des eigenen Kreises dasjenige, was man entwickeln kann durch seine Fähigkeiten, zu entwickeln: den mechanischen Okkultismus; und man strebt an, zu beherrschen diejenige Bevölkerung, welche den eugenetischen Okkultismus entwickelt. Jeder Wissende in den Zirkeln des Westens sagt: Es ist notwendig, daß wir zum Beispiel Indien beherrschen, aus dem Grunde, weil nur in der Fortsetzung desjenigen, was aus indischen Leibern kommt — wenn es sich mit dem verbindet, was im Westen nach ganz anderer Richtung hin, nach der Richtung des nur mechanischen Okkultismus geht -, Körper entstehen, in denen sich zukünftig Seelen verkörpern können, die die Erde zu ihren künftigen Entwickelungsstadien hinübertragen. Die englisch sprechenden Okkultisten wissen, daß sie verzichten müssen auf die Leiber, welche aus ihrer eigenen Volksgrundlage heraus kommen, und sie streben danach, die Herrschaft über eine Bevölkerung zu haben, welche Leiber liefern wird, mit Hilfe welcher die Entwickelung der Erde in die Zukunft hinausgetragen werden kann.

Die amerikanischen Okkultisten wissen, daß sie nur, wenn sie von sich aus dasjenige pflegen, was innerhalb der russischen Bevölkerung sich an Leibern der Zukunft durch die eugenetisch okkulte Anlage entwickelt, wenn sie das beherrschen, so daß allmählich eine soziale Verbindung zwischen ihren absterbenden Rasseeigentümlichkeiten und den aufkeimenden psychischen Rasseeigentümlichkeiten des europäischen Rußland zustande kommt, daß sie nur dann in die Zukunft hinübertragen können, was sie hinübertragen wollen.

Von einer dritten Fähigkeit, die heute latent ist und die sich entwickeln wird, muß ich Ihnen sprechen. Es ist diejenige, die ich nennen möchte die hygienische okkulte Fähigkeit. Nun haben wir alle drei: die materielle okkulte Fähigkeit, die eugenetische okkulte Fähigkeit und die hygienische okkulte Fähigkeit. Diese hygienische okkulte Fähigkeit ist auf dem guten Wege und wird verhältnismäßig nicht lange auf sich warten lassen. Diese Fähigkeit wird einfach durch die Einsicht reifen, daß das menschliche Leben, indem es von der Geburt bis zum Tode verläuft, nach einem Prozeß verläuft, der ganz identisch ist mit einem Krankheitsprozeß. Krankheitsprozesse sind nämlich nur spezielle und radikale Umbildungen des ganz gewöhnlichen, normalen Lebensprozesses, der zwischen Geburt und Tod verläuft, nur daß wir in uns nicht nur die krankmachenden Kräfte tragen, sondern auch die gesundmachenden Kräfte. Und diese gesundmachenden Kräfte, das weiß jeder Okkultist, sind ganz genau dieselben wie diejenigen, welche man dann anwendet, wenn man sich okkulte Fähigkeiten erwirbt, indem man diese Kräfte in Erkenntnisse umwandelt. Die dem menschlichen Organismus innewohnende Heilkraft in Erkenntnis umgewandelt gibt eben okkulte Erkenntnisse.

Es weiß nun wiederum jeder Wissende in den westlichen Zirkeln, daß in Zukunft die materialistische Medizin keinen Boden haben wird. Denn in dem Augenblicke, wo sich die hygienisch-okkulten Fähigkeiten entwickeln, wird man nicht eine äußere materielle Medizin brauchen, sondern es wird die Möglichkeit da sein, jene Krankheiten, die nicht durch karmische Ursachen entstehen und deshalb unbeeinflußbar sind, auf psychischem Wege prophylaktisch zu behandeln, zu verhüten. Es wird sich alles in dieser Beziehung ändern. Das erscheint heute noch wie eine bloße Phantasie, aber das ist etwas, was sogar sehr bald kommen wird.

Nur liegt die Sache so, daß diese drei Fähigkeiten nicht etwa gleichmäßig über alle Bevölkerung der Erde kommen. Sie haben ja schon die Differenzierung gesehen. Diese Differenzierung hat natürlich nur etwas zu tun mit den Leibern, nicht mit den Seelen, die ja immer von Rasse zu Rasse und von Volk zu Volk gehen; aber mit den Leibern hat sie sehr viel zu tun, diese Differenzierung. Aus den Leibern der englisch sprechenden Bevölkerung kann niemals herauskommen die Fähigkeit, durch Geburt eugenetisch-okkulte Fähigkeiten in Zukunft zu entwickeln. Sie werden angewendet werden gerade im Westen, aber dadurch angewendet werden, daß man Östländer beherrschen wird und Ehen herbeiführen wird zwischen den Menschen des Westens und den Menschen des Ostens; daß man benützen wird dasjenige, was man nur von den Menschen des Ostens erfahren kann.

Für die hygienisch-okkulten Fähigkeiten sind besonders veranlagt die Menschen der Mittelländer. Und die Sache liegt so, daß die englischsprechende Bevölkerung nicht durch die Geburtsanlage die hygienisch-okkulten Fähigkeiten erlangen kann, daß sie aber im Laufe der Zeit in der Entwickelung zwischen Geburt und Tod sich diese Fähigkeiten erwerben kann. Da können sie erworbene Eigenschaften werden. Und bei der Bevölkerung ungefähr östlich vom Rhein bis nach Asien hinein werden sie durch die Geburt vorhanden sein. Und wiederum ist es so, daß die Bevölkerung der Mittelländer die eugenetischokkulte Anlage nicht unmittelbar erwerben kann durch Geburt, aber sie im Laufe des Lebens sich aneignen kann, wenn sie in die Lehre geht bei den Menschen des Ostens. So werden diese Fähigkeiten verteilt sein. Die Menschen des Ostens werden gar keine Fähigkeit haben zum materiellen Okkultismus; sie werden ihn nur empfangen können, wenn man ihn ihnen gibt, wenn man ihn nicht vor ihnen geheim hält. Und man kann immer die Mittel finden, ihn geheim zu halten, besonders wenn die andern so töricht sind, an die Dinge nicht zu glauben, die jemand sagt, der einmal in der Lage ist, in diese Dinge ungefähr hineinzuschauen. Die Menschen also des Ostens und die Menschen der Mittelländer werden den materiellen Okkultismus vom Westen erhalten müssen. Sie werden die Segnungen eben erhalten — die Produkte. Der hygienische Okkultismus, er wird sich vorzugsweise in den Mittelländern entwickeln, der eugenetische in den Ostländern. Aber eine Kommunikation wird zwischen den Menschen stattfinden müssen. Das ist etwas, was in die sozialen Impulse der Zukunft aufgenommen werden muß; das ist etwas, was notwendig macht, daß die Menschen einsehen: Sie können über die ganze Erde hin in der Zukunft nur noch als Gesamtmenschheit leben. Denn wollte der Amerikaner nur als Amerikaner leben, so würde er zwar den höchsten materiellen Effekt erreichen können, aber er würde sich dazu verdammen, niemals über die Erdenentwickelung hinauskommen zu können. Er würde sich dazu verdammen, wenn er nicht die sozialen Beziehungen zum Osten suchte, als Seele nach irgendeiner Inkarnation in das Erdengebiet gebannt zu werden und nur innerhalb des Erdengebietes zu spuken. Die Erde würde herausgehoben werden aus ihrem kosmischen Zusammenhange, und es würden alle diese Seelen spuken müssen. Der Mensch des Ostens hingegen würde, wenn er nicht aufnehmen würde mit seinen eugenetisch-okkulten Fähigkeiten das, was zur Erde niederzieht, den Materialismus des Westens, die Erde verlieren. Er würde bloß in irgendeine psychisch-spirituelle Entwickelung hineingezogen werden, und er würde die Erdenentwickelung verlieren; die Erde würde gleichsam unter ihm versinken, er würde die Früchte der Erdenentwickelung nicht haben können.

Vertrauen unter den Menschen im tief innersten Sinn muß eintreten. Das zeigt gerade diese merkwürdige Menschenentwickelung der Zukunft. Es liegt durchaus im vernünftigen Sinn der Zentren des Westens, die Dinge nur so zu pflegen, wie sie sie pflegen können. Es ist nicht an den Menschen des Westens, auf dasjenige besonders zu sehen, was sich im Osten entwickelt von dem Gesichtspunkte der Menschen des Ostens aus; was sich bei andern entwickelt, das muß den andern überlassen bleiben. Das ist es, was man sich recht, recht tief in die Seelen schreiben soll, daß hier ein Punkt erreicht ist, wo Schuld oder Unschuld oder dergleichen Begriffe überhaupt ihre Bedeutung verlieren, wo es sich darum handelt, die Dinge im allertiefsten Sinne voll ernst zu nehmen, weil sie ein Wissen enthalten, das allein geeignet ist, in die Lenkung der Menschheit in der Zukunft überzugehen.

Es ist sehr wichtig, diese Dinge in einer gewissen Art zu betrachten. Denn bedenken Sie, daß über die Erde hin, differenziert nach den verschiedenen Menschen, nach den Menschen des Westens, der Mittelländer und des Ostens, sich dreierlei okkulte Fähigkeiten entwickeln, die sich gewissermaßen verschlingen, und zwar so sich ineinanderschlingen, daß der Mensch des Westens Anlage hat zum materiellen Okkultismus von der Geburt, aber sich erwerben kann hygienischen Okkultismus; daß der Mensch der Mittelländer vorzugsweise durch die Geburt Anlage hat für den hygienischen Okkultismus, daß er sich aber erwerben kann, wenn man sie ihm gibt, vom Westen her den materiellen, vom Osten her den eugenetischen Okkultismus; daß der Mensch des Ostens von der Geburt Anlage hat für den eugenetischen Okkultismus, daß er sich aber erwerben kann, von den Mittelländern aus, den hygienischen Okkultismus. Diese Fähigkeiten treten differenziert über die Menschheit der Erde verteilt auf, aber zu gleicher Zeit so, daß sie sich verschlingen. Und durch die Verschlingungen wird eben das zukünftige soziale Gemeinschaftsband über die ganze Erde bedingt sein.

Nun gibt es aber Hindernisse für die Entwickelung dieser Fähigkeiten; und die sind mannigfaltiger Art, und ihre Wirksamkeit ist eigentlich eine recht komplizierte. So ist zum Beispiel gerade für den Menschen der Mittelländer und der Ostländer ein bedeutsames Hindernis, die Fähigkeiten, die da kommen sollen, namentlich wissentlich zu entwickeln, wenn starke Antipathien gegen die Menschen der Westländer in ihnen spielen, wenn diese Dinge nicht objektiv betrachtet werden können. Das ist ein Hindernis für die Entwickelung dieser Fähigkeiten. Dagegen wird in einer gewissen Weise sogar die Anlage zu einer späteren okkulten Fähigkeit unterstützt, wenn sie aus gewissen Instinkten des Hasses heraus entwickelt wird. Das ist eine sehr eigentümliche Erscheinung. Denn man fragt sich doch so oft - hier liegt nämlich etwas, was recht objektiv betrachtet werden sollte -: Warum ist denn eigentlich auf dem Gebiete der Westländer so unsinnig geschimpft worden? - Das zielt auch aus dem Instinkte schon nach diesen Fähigkeiten hin. Denn nichts wird das, was in den tiefsten Impulsen des westlichen Okkultismus liegt, mehr fördern, als wenn sich unwahre, aber gewissermaßen als heilig empfundene Gefühle entwickeln, welche die Menschen des Ostens, namentlich die Menschen der Mittelländer als «Barbaren » hinstellen können. Gefördert werden die materiellen okkulten Anlagen gerade zum Beispiel durch jene Stimmung, welche in Amerika die sogenannte «Kreuzzugstimmung » ist. Diese besteht darin, daß Amerika berufen sei, Freiheit und Recht, und ich weiß schon nicht, was die schönen Dinge alle sind, über die ganze Erde zu bringen. Die Leute glauben das selbstverständlich. Hier ist nicht die Rede von irgendwelcher Anschuldigung. Die Leute glauben, daß sie einen Kreuzzug machen. Aber gerade darin, daß man das Unrichtige glaubt, darinnen liegt die Unterstützung nach einer gewissen Richtung hin. Würde man bewußt das Unrichtige sagen, dann würde man diese Unterstützung nicht haben. So ist auf der einen Seite dasjenige, was jetzt geschieht, unendlich förderlich, auf der andern Seite hinderlich gerade der Entwickelung derjenigen Fähigkeiten, von denen man sagen muß, daß sie heute bei den meisten Menschen noch latent sind, daß sie sich aber gegen die Zukunft hin entwickeln wollen, und daß sie tief eingreifen werden in die soziale Struktur der Menschen der Zukunft.

Denken Sie einmal, wie sich Ihnen durchglüht und durchsättigt mit Verständnis und Einsicht alles das, was in der Gegenwart geschieht, wenn Sie diese Hintergründe ins Auge fassen, wenn Sie erkennen, daß hinter all dem, was bewußt heute vielfach gesagt wird, die diesen Ausführungen entsprechenden unterbewußten Instinkte liegen! Die wichtigste Tatsache dabei ist aber diese, daß durch ganz besondere Evolutionsvorgänge eben die britisch sprechende Bevölkerung solche geheimen okkulten Zentren hat, die diese Dinge kennen, die wissen, welche Fähigkeiten sie in der Zukunft haben werden als Angehörige der britisch sprechenden Bevölkerung und welche Fähigkeiten ihnen mangeln werden, die daher auch wissen, wie sie die soziale Struktur einrichten müssen, damit sie das, was ihnen mangelt, auch in ihren Dienst stellen können. In der Richtung solcher Dinge wirken aber die Instinkte, und diese Instinkte haben auch schon gewirkt, sie haben ungeheuer gewirkt, sie haben bedeutungsvoll gewirkt.

Ein besonders brauchbares Mittel, wenn man ins unrichtige Fahrwasser lenken will, was durch das westliche okkulte Wissen impulsiert werden kann, ist, den Osten so zu bearbeiten, daß er seinen alten Hang, bloße Religion ohne Wissenschaft zu entwickeln, auch in der Zukunft beibehält. Die Führer der westlichen Geheimzirkel werden dafür sorgen, daß es etwas, was weder bloße Religion noch bloße Wissenschaft ist, sondern die Synthese von beiden, das Zusammenwirken von Wissen und Glauben, dort nicht gibt. Aber sie werden auch dafür sorgen, daß jene Wissenschaft, die sonst auch auf den Inhalt der Religion übergeht, eben bloß im Geheimen wirkt, daß sie bloß die wichtigeren Angelegenheiten der Menschheit und die politische Führung der Erde beim Erringen der britischen Weltherrschaft durchdringt. Ungeheuer helfen wird es bei der Ausbreitung dieser Weltherrschaft, wenn der Osten möglichst die religiösen Vorstellungen nicht mit Wissenschaft durchdringt.

Nun denken Sie, wie gerade alles Russische diesem westlichen Streben entgegenkommt. Da ist auf der einen Seite in Rußland heute noch das Streben, fromm zu sein, aber nicht zu durchdringen den Inhalt der Frömmigkeit mit spiritueller Wissenschaft, gewissermaßen in einer unklaren Mystik zu bleiben. Diese unklare Mystik, die würde ein gutes Förderungsmittel sein für das, was der Westen als Oberherrschaft über den Osten will.

Auf der andern Seite handelt es sich darum, die Wissenschaft, die für die Erde ist, womöglich atheistisch zu machen. Und darin hat gerade die Kultur der britisch sprechenden Bevölkerung in der neueren Zeit ungeheuer Fruchtbares geleistet. Diese britisch sprechende Bevölkerung kann sich wahrhaftig nicht beklagen. Sie hat Ungeheueres erreicht, denn sie hat ihre wissenschaftliche Richtung, die religionslose Wissenschaft, die atheistische Wissenschaft im Grunde über die ganze Erde verbreitet. Die ist Herrscherin geworden über die ganze Erde. Der Goetheanismus, der ganz bewußt das Gegenteil davon ist, konnte ja selbst im Lande Goethes nicht aufkommen, ist selbst im Lande Goethes eine ziemlich unbekannte Sache! Dasjenige, was als Intellekt heute die Wissenschaft beherrscht, das ist durchaus im Sinne desjenigen gehalten, was offenbar werden soll als äußerlicher Ausdruck der von den Zirkeln im Geheimen gepflegten, aber dort wohl als Synthese zwischen Wissenschaft und Religion gepflegten Wissenschaft. Für die Außenwelt soll es nur die atheistische Wissenschaft geben; für die inneren Zirkel, welche den Gang der Weltereignisse leiten sollen, eine Wissenschaft, welche zu gleicher Zeit Religion, eine Religion, welche zu gleicher Zeit Wissenschaft ist.

Am besten in der Hand haben wird man den Osten, wenn man ihm eine wissenschaftslose Religion erhält. Am besten in der Hand haben wird man die Mittelländer, wenn man ihnen aufpfropft, weil sie sich eine Religion nicht aufpfropfen lassen, eine religionslose Wissenschaft. Diese Dinge werden von denjenigen, die als Wissende in den genannten Zirkeln stehen, ganz bewußt, von den andern instinktiv gefördert. Und nachdem die aus überlebter Zeit herstammenden Herrschaftsmächte der Mittelländer weggefegt sind, ist ja in den Mittelländern zunächst nichts da, was an die Stelle gesetzt werden kann. Das macht es ja auch so schwierig, die ganze welthistorische Sachlage der Gegenwart richtig zu beurteilen. Alle Welt hat sich befaßt mit der Frage der Schuld oder der Ursache dieser kriegerischen Katastrophe. Aber alle diese Dinge finden nur ihre Beleuchtung, wenn man sie auf dem Hintergrunde desjenigen betrachtet, was als wirksame Kräfte nicht in den äußeren Phänomenen zutage tritt. Es läßt sich über diese Dinge nicht urteilen nach den Kategorien, nach den Denkkategorien, nach denen man gewöhnlich urteilt, wenn man die Schuld- oder Unschuld-Frage aufwirft - gerade aus den heute Ihnen dargelegten Gründen nicht.

Ich weiß sehr gut, daß heute, wo man sogar schon Wilson den Papst des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts nennt, aber nicht im abträglichen, sondern im zustimmenden Sinne, weil er berechtigterweise der Laienpapst des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts ist, selbst in den Mittelländern sich nach und nach ein getrübtes Urteil über den Hergang dieses Weltkrieges, wie man ihn nennt, entwickeln wird, weil man die eigentlichen Fragestellungen nicht berücksichtigen wird. Jedes Dokument wird das beweisen, was ich sage. Aber man muß die Dokumente auf dem richtigen Untergrunde sehen. Man muß vor allem die Möglichkeit haben, ein Urteil zu gewinnen. Dieses Urteil ergibt sich in diesem Falle nur demjenigen, der etwas Licht von jenseits der Schwelle auf die Dinge bringen kann. Denn sehen Sie, ich fürchte, daß sich durch die Dinge, die ja jetzt, man könnte sagen, Tag für Tag zutage treten, immer falschere und falschere Urteilswege geltend machen werden, daß immer weniger Menschen geneigt sein werden, auf die Frage so einzugehen, daß dieses Eingehen fruchtbar sein kann. Ich glaube, die Leute werden sich sonderbare Gedanken machen, wenn sie jetzt zum Beispiel durch die Zeitungen erfahren - mag es wahr sein oder nicht wahr sein, es könnte aber wahr sein -, daß der abgedankte deutsche Kaiser sagt: Ich bin ja gar nicht dabei gewesen, als der Krieg gemacht worden ist - Sie werden es in den letzten Blättern gelesen haben -, das haben Bethmann und Jagow gemacht!

Es ist natürlich unerhört, wenn so etwas von diesem Munde ausgesprochen wird, selbstverständlich unerhört! Aber es gibt überall im geheimen beeinflußte Urteile, die dann in falsche Wege geraten durch solche Dinge. Sehen Sie, um was es sich da handelt, das ist, daß man wirklich ganz genau die Tatsachen berücksichtigen muß, um die richtigen Fragen stellen zu können. Dann wird man schon sehen, daß man wahrhaftig die tiefe, tragische Notwendigkeit, die dieser Katastrophe zugrunde liegt, nicht so oberflächlich wird ins Auge fassen dürfen, wie das so häufig geschieht. Auch die oberflächlichen Ereignisse dürfen nicht oberflächlich ins Auge gefaßt werden.

Ich will Sie auf einen Fall aufmerksam machen; Sie werden gleich nachher sehen, warum ich solch eine Einzelheit herausgreife. Ich habe schon vor einiger Zeit hier auseinandergesetzt, daß ja eigentlich gewiß viele Ereignisreihen, Tatsachenreihen in Deutschland vorhanden gewesen sind, die zum Kriege hätten führen können, die aber dann abgerissen sind, die nicht zu ihm geführt haben, während tatsächlich dasjenige, was zum Kriege geführt hat, im Grunde genommen aus gewissen Voraussetzungen erst sehr spät eingesetzt hat und in gar keinem Zusammenhang steht mit den anderen Dingen. Ich will heute nicht wiederholen, was ich Ihnen nach dieser Richtung schon gesagt habe, aber ich möchte Ihnen eines heute zu bedenken geben, damit Sie sehen, wie in der Weltgeschichte die Dinge, ich möchte sagen, zusammenklappen, die als äußere Symptome wirken, während dem die großen Dinge hinter ihnen stehen, von denen ich Ihnen heute gesprochen habe.

Sehen Sie, man kann die Frage aufwerfen: Hätte die ganze kriegerische Katastrophe, wie sie vom Juli 1914 oder August 1914 an eingetreten ist, unter Umständen auch einen anderen Verlauf nehmen können als den, den sie genommen hat? Ich will jetzt nicht darauf eingehen, ob diese Katastrophe als solche hätte vermieden werden können oder nicht, das steht auf einem andern Blatte, aber ich will die Frage aufwerfen: Hätte diese Katastrophe einen anderen Verlauf nehmen können? Nun, sie hätte einen anderen Verlauf nehmen können; das wäre durchaus denkbar, obwohl diese Dinge hinterher zu sagen, ich möchte sagen, nur einen methodischen Wert hat. Aber denkbar wäre es nach den Ereignissen und auch nach den okkulten Hintergründen, daß die ganze Katastrophe einen anderen Verlauf genommen hätte. Man muß schichtenweise urteilen. Dasjenige, was ich jetzt sage, gilt natürlich wiederum nur für eine gewisse Schicht der Tatsachen. Und innerhalb dieser Schichte der Tatsachen kann man etwa folgendes urteilen. Man kann sagen: Es wäre auch denkbar gewesen, daß der Krieg 1914 so begonnen worden wäre, daß das deutsche Heer nach Osten gezogen wäre, und man abgewartet hätte, ob dadurch, daß im Osten der Krieg entsteht, im Westen dann auch ein Krieg folgen werde. Es wäre denkbar gewesen, daß man mit der Hauptmasse des deutschen Heeres gegen Rußland gezogen wäre, daß man gegen den Westen eine bloße Defensive eingehalten und abgewartet hätte, ob die Franzosen, die ja in diesem Falle keine Bündnispflicht gehabt hätten, angreifen. Sie hätten keine Bündnispflicht in dem Augenblicke gehabt, wenn man nicht den Krieg nach Osten erklärt haben würde, sondern abgewartet hätte, bis die russischen Armeen wirklich einfallen. Sie wären nämlich eingefallen; das ist ohne Frage, daß sie eingefallen wären. Ich behaupte jetzt nicht, daß es nicht fünf Jahre früher eine andere Hypothese gegeben hätte, die in anderer Richtung hätte gehen können, aber 1914 war es nicht mehr möglich. Innerhalb dieser Schichte der Tatsachen könnte man sich denken, daß der Krieg eine Grundwendung nach Osten hin genommen hätte. Das wäre möglich gewesen. Und dennoch war es unmöglich. Es war eigentlich dennoch tatsächlich unmöglich aus dem Grunde, weil nach Osten hinüber kein deutscher Feldzugsplan vorlag. Man hat niemals daran gedacht, daß der Kriegsfall anders eintreten könnte, als daß Deutschland provoziert würde zu einem Angriff auf Rußland, daß dadurch für Frankreich der Bündnisfall für Rußland-Frankreich gegeben sei, und daß Deutschland dann einen Zweifrontenkrieg zu führen hat.

Nun ging man unter dem Axiom, das sich innerhalb der deutschen Strategie vom Beginne des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts an gebildet hat, davon aus, daß dieser Zweifrontenkrieg nicht anders als oflensiv geführt werden kann. Nur der Feldzugsplan war da, mit einem Einmarsch durch Belgien rasch nach Westen hin Frankreich zu einem Sonderfrieden zu zwingen — das war gewiß eine Illusion, aber es waren diese Illusionen vorliegend -, und dann die Heeresmassen nach Osten zu werfen. Nun bitte ich Sie zu bedenken, was ein solcher strategischer Plan ist. Er ist für jede Einzelheit, für jeden Tag berechnet. Er rechnet genau, wie lange es dauern darf von dem Tage, an dem die russische Gesamtmobilisation eintritt, bis der erste Befehl gegeben wird für die deutsche Mobilisation, die dann nicht warten kann, sondern weitergeht, weil der erste Anstoß die russische Gesamtmobilisation ist. Am Tage danach, am zweiten Tage danach, am dritten Tage danach muß das und das geschehen. Wartet man nur einen Tag nach der russischen Generalmobilisation, so ist der ganze Plan umgeworfen und kann nicht mehr ausgeführt werden. Das ist es, was ich Sie bitte zu bedenken, daß so etwas tatsächlich entscheidend war in dem Augenblicke, wo gar keine mitteleuropäische Politik vorhanden war. Das ist natürlich das Wesentliche, daß keine mitteleuropäische Politik vorhanden war. Denn Bethmann redet heute noch immer Unsinn. Man war verzweifelt, wenn Bethmann im deutschen Reichstage seine unglaublichsten, seine unmöglichsten Dinge redete; aber er redet sie noch heute. Es war gar keine Politik vorhanden, sondern nur Strategie, aber eine Strategie, welche auf einen ganz bestimmten Fall aufgebaut war. Da konnte man nichts ändern, da konnte man nicht einmal in der Stunde etwas ändern.

Ich bitte Sie also zu bedenken, daß nach der äußeren Veranlassung niemand in Deutschland den Krieg zu wollen brauchte, er mußte doch entstehen. Man brauchte ihn gar nicht zu wollen. Das bitte ich Sie zu berücksichtigen. Er mußte entstehen, einfach aus dem Grunde, weil ganz automatisch - selbstverständlich indem Augenblicke, wo Rußland Befehle zur Gesamtmobilisation erläßt, wie wenn der Zeiger einer Uhr auf Zwölf rückt - in dem deutschen Heerführer der Gedanke entsteht: Jetzt muß ich mobilisieren. - Und von da ab geht alles automatisch. Das entsteht gar nicht durch den Willen, das entsteht dadurch, daß es jahrelang vorbereitet ist. Ganz automatisch folgt auf die russische Gesamtmobilisation der Einfall durch Belgien nach Frankreich, weil man das als das einzig Vernünftige ansieht. Dem Kaiser konnte man es nicht sagen, weil man - ich habe es Ihnen ja schon erzählt - wußte: der ist so indiskret, wenn man es ihm heute sagte, so weiß es morgen die ganze Welt. Daß durch Belgien eingefallen wurde, hat er erst erfahren in der Stunde, als mobilisiert wurde. Ähnliche Dinge sind massenhaft vorgekommen. Diese Dinge bitte ich Sie zu berücksichtigen, dann werden Sie sich sagen: Man brauchte natürlich überhaupt nicht zu wollen innerhalb Deutschlands - der Krieg mußte entstehen. Ich sage: Wenn man innerhalb dieser Tatsachenschichte bleibt. Natürlich können Sie übergehen zu einer anderen Tatsachenschichte; aber da kommen Sie zu ganz verwickelten Fragen.

Es ist wirklich so, daß einen da einmal etwas Großes, etwas, was zur Menschheitskatastrophe wird, erinnert an die Geschichte von dem braven Rektor Kaltenbrunner, die ich Ihnen erzählt habe mit Bezug auf Hamerling. Sie erinnern sich, daß ich Ihnen erzählt habe: Wenn man sich Robert Hamerlings Dichterpersönlichkeit vor die Seele führt und sie versteht, so sagt man sich: Was in dieser Persönlichkeit wirkt, rührt zum großen Teil davon her, daß er in einem bestimmten Zeitpunkte als Gymnasiallehrer nach Triest kam und von da seine Urlaube nach Venedig antreten konnte, daß er also an die Gestade der Adria kam. Die ganze innere Seelenstruktur dieses Hamerling hängt davon ab, daß er zehn Jahre als Gymnasiallehrer — denn nur das hat er sein können nach den Antezedenzien seiner Entwickelung - in Triest an der Adria verleben konnte. Aber wodurch ist er dahin gekommen? Ich habe es Ihnen erzählt: Er hat ein Gesuch geschrieben, als er Supplent in Graz war, um eine erledigte Stelle in Budapest. Nun denke man sich: Da hat er ein Gesuch geschrieben; wenn die Behörde das bekommen und genehmigt hätte, wäre Hamerling die ganzen zehn Jahre nach Budapest gekommen. Die ganze Dichterpersönlichkeit wäre aufgehoben, die wäre nicht da; wer sie kennt, der weiß das. Wodurch ist das bewirkt, daß er nicht nach Budapest kam, sondern nach Triest? Der brave Rektor Kaltenbrunner, dem das Gesuch zunächst übergeben werden mußte, verbummelte es, ließ es in seiner Schublade so lange liegen, bis die Stelle in Budapest besetzt war. Und als die Stelle besetzt war und Hamerling sagte: Um Gotteswillen, ich wäre so gerne auf die Stelle in Budapest gekommen! — da wurde der brave Rektor Kaltenbrunner rot und sagte: Ach Gott, jetzt hab’ ich das ganz vergessen, das liegt noch in meiner Schublade! - Und Hamerling wurde davor gerettet, nach Budapest zu kommen. Das nächste Mal, als sich Hamerling nach Triest meldete, da vergaß nach diesem Vorgange der brave Rektor Kaltenbrunner nicht, es weiterzugeben, Hamerling kam nach Triest und wurde dadurch «der Hamerling». Nun frage ich Sie: Hat der brave Rektor Kaltenbrunner den Hamerling als Dichter in die Welt gestellt? - Dennoch gibt es keinen anderen Urheber unter den äußeren Phänomenen, als daß Hamerling «der Hamerling» geworden ist durch die Bummelei des braven Kaltenbrunner, Rektor in Graz in der Steiermark. Es ist eben nur möglich, hinter die Dinge zu kommen, wenn man Symptomatologie treibt; denn diese Symptomatologie, die leitet einen dazu an, die äußeren Erscheinungen in der richtigen Weise zu taxieren und dasjenige zu sehen, was hinter den Symptomen steht. Das ist das Wichtige. Das ist es, was ich immer mehr erreichen möchte.

Wenn man diese Katastrophe der Gegenwart anschaut, dann findet man eben durchaus nicht eine leichte Möglichkeit, aus den Wirrnissen herauszukommen. Betrachten Sie nur die große Schwierigkeit, die vorliegt. Nehmen wir an, Mr. Grey ginge darauf aus, bloß aus den äußeren Dokumenten zu beweisen, daß er ganz schuldlos ist an dem Ausbruch des Krieges. Das kann man selbstverständlich beweisen, so leicht wie möglich. Man kann aus den äußeren Dokumenten ganz strikte den Beweis führen, daß die britische Regierung unschuldig ist an dem Ausbruch dieses Krieges. Aber überall handelt es sich darum, was die Beweise für ein Gewicht haben. Sie können nur dahinterkommen, wenn Sie die Frage so stellen, wie ich sie seit Jahren auch vor Ihnen hier gestellt habe: Wäre zum Beispiel die britische Regierung in der Lage gewesen, den Einfall in Belgien zu verhindern? — Darauf müssen Sie sagen: Ja, sie wäre in der Lage gewesen. — Denn das ist es gerade, was ich wiederum forderte in meiner Denkschrift, daß vor der Welt schlicht Tatsachen hingestellt worden wären. Die hätten natürlich auf der einen Seite dazu geführt, daß jener Herr, der jetzt nach Holland desertiert ist, dazumal schon irgendwie hätte verduften müssen. Vielleicht hängt das zusammen damit, daß meine Denkschrift ja so wenig Anklang gefunden hat, auch bei denen, die sie haben beurteilen können. Aber ich habe verlangt, daß die Ereignisse vor allen Dingen von Minute zu Minute erzählt werden, schlicht, ohne Färbung, so wie sie sich abgespielt haben zu gleicher Zeit in Berlin und in London zwischen halb fünf Uhr Sonnabend - Sie wissen, Sonnabend ist die Mobilisation um halb fünf Uhrin Berlin unterschrieben worden - und halb elfUhr nachts. Diese entscheidenden Ereignisse, in die nichts hineinspielt von alledem, wovon die Welt geredet hat, schlicht erzählt, liefern den Beweis, daß es möglich gewesen wäre, daß der Einfall in Belgien von der britischen Regierung hätte verhindert werden können. Er ist nicht verhindert worden. Daher wurde am Sonnabend um halb elf Uhr der einzige Befehl, zu dem sich die Majestät gegen den Willen der deutschen Strategie aufgerafft hatte, das Heer zurückzuhalten, nicht nach Westen marschieren zu lassen, sondern im Westen nur Defensive zu machen - dieser einzige Befehl wurde Sonnabend um halb elf Uhr rückgängig gemacht, und es blieb bei der alten Strategie. Da müssen aber dann die Ereignisse von Minute zu Minute, möchte ich sagen, zwischen Sonnabend um halb fünf und um halb elf Uhr nachts wirklich erzählt werden, bloß die Tatsachen schlicht erzählt werden. Da stellt sich dann natürlich ein ganz anderes Bild heraus, vor allen Dingen ein Bild, welches dahin führt, die Fragestellungen richtig zu machen.

Nun steht ja zu fürchten, daß das Weltenpublikum sich von dem beeinflussen läßt, was man in den Archiven findet; aber die Tatsachen, die die entscheidenden sind, die sich Sonnabend von halb fünf Uhr bis halb elf Uhr nachts zugetragen haben, die werden wahrscheinlich niemals aus Archiven an die Welt kommen, denn sie sind wahrscheinlich gar nicht aufgeschrieben worden, das heißt, sie sind aufgeschrieben worden, aber sie sind nicht so aufgeschrieben worden, daß man die Niederschriften in Archiven finden wird.

Sehen Sie, Vorsicht im Urteilen, das ist es, was man auch gewinnen muß. Wenn man diese Vorsicht im Urteilen gewinnen kann, so ist das eine große Hilfe für die Entwickelung jener latenten Fähigkeiten, von denen ich Ihnen eben heute gesprochen habe, die sich in der Menschheitszukunft entwickeln müssen, dreigliederig differenziert über die Erde hin. Und dann werden Sie schon darauf kommen, daß wahrhaftig nicht aus irgendeinem intellektuellen Gedanken heraus als ein abstraktes Programm heute vor acht Tagen dasjenige entwickelt worden ist, was ich als die einzige berechtigte Lösung der sozialen Frage, soweit man heute im angegebenen Sinne von einer solchen Lösung sprechen kann, bezeichnete.

Third Lecture

In these reflections, it was important to me to shed some light on the form that social thinking should take in the present. Today, I would like to add a few things to what I have already said, which may give you the opportunity to raise these issues to a higher level, which is indeed very necessary given the special demands of the spirit of our age. I would ask you to consider all the things I have said and will say—I would like to repeat this once again—not as a criticism of the times or the circumstances, but merely as material for forming a judgment, material that can provide a basis for gaining an insightful overview of the circumstances. The point of view of the spiritual sciences cannot be to offer social criticism, but merely to point out what is, without pessimism or optimism. That is why one is naturally always compelled to use words that are interpreted by some as criticism of one social class or another. That is not the case. When we speak of the bourgeoisie here, we speak of it as a historically necessary phenomenon, not to level any accusation against what was, from a certain humanistic point of view, simply necessary. And I would ask you to understand the things I am going to say today in this light.

First, we start from the comprehensive impulse that, like all or a large number of human movements, lies more or less explicitly and also more or less instinctively and unconsciously, confusedly and unclearly, but nevertheless strongly, at the root of today's proletarian social demands. This is the impulse to create a social order that is satisfactory in all respects. If one wants to characterize what lies at the root of this in a radical—and therefore false—way, one might say: An attempt is being made to conceive and realize a social order that will bring about paradise on earth, or at least that state of happiness for all people that is considered desirable by the proletarian population in our time. This is called the “solution to the social question,” and what I have just said is instinctively behind what is called the solution to the social question.

Now, with regard to this solution to the social question, it is necessary that the scholar of the humanities, who should not indulge in illusions in any field but should look at reality, should not indulge in illusions here either. For it is precisely in this field that it is essential that people who strive for these things do not start from an illusion-free standpoint, but from a standpoint before which a great sum of illusions stands, above all the one fundamental illusion that it is possible to “solve” the social question.

This is connected in a certain way with the fact that our age has no awareness of the difference between the physical plane and the spiritual worlds; that our age instinctively regards the physical plane as the only world and wants to conjure up paradise on this physical plane. This forces it to believe that human beings are either condemned to find justice and harmony between their instincts and needs nowhere, or to find them within physical existence on earth. But the physical plane, to those who view the world imaginatively, who therefore go to the true reality, appears in such a way that one must say: There is no perfection in it, only imperfection. — Therefore, it is impossible to speak of a complete solution to the social question at all. You can try as you like to solve the social question from the depths of your knowledge, but it can never be solved in the sense that many people believe today. But that must not lead us to say: Well, if the social question cannot be solved, then let's leave it as it is, let's continue with the same old nonsense. — The situation is like that of a pendulum: the force that swings it upward is gained from the force of gravity as it swings downward. Just as the opposite force is accumulated during the downward swing and then used up during the upward swing, so it is in the rhythmic sequence of human history. Whatever you may find to be the most perfect social order for a certain age, or indeed any order at all, once you realize it, it wears itself out and after a while leads back into disorder. Evolutionary life is not such that it rises evenly, but rather it proceeds in ebb and flow, in a wave-like vibration. And through the best things you establish, when you realize them on the physical plane, you bring about conditions which, after a certain time, cause the destruction of what you have established. The situation of humanity would be quite different if this inexorable law of necessity were properly recognized in historical events. One would then not believe that it is possible to establish paradise on earth in the absolute sense, but one would be compelled to look at the cyclical law of human evolution. And by ruling out an absolute answer to the question: How should social life be organized? — one will do the right thing when one asks: What must be done for our age? What exactly do the impulses of our fifth post-Atlantean age require? What does reality want to achieve? By being aware that what we realize will necessarily be destroyed again in the cyclical reversal, we must be clear that we can only think socially in this relative way, by recognizing the developmental impulses of a particular age. One must work with reality. One works against reality if one believes that one can achieve anything with abstract, absolute ideals. For the spiritual scientist who wants to grasp reality, not illusion, the question is limited to this: What wants to be realized immediately in the present reality?

Yesterday's discussions were also meant from this point of view, and you are completely misinterpreting me if you believe that I think an absolute paradise will be created by separating the fruits of labor from labor itself. Rather, based on the deeper laws of human development, I consider this to be a necessity that must now happen. For behind what people have in their consciousness, behind what the proletarian view of life in particular urges, even if it sometimes pushes things into such radical demands as those I listed to you yesterday as Bolshevik demands, lies what they instinctively want to achieve. And those who look at reality do not allow themselves to be presented with programs, not even that of the Russian Soviet Republic, but rather they seek to see what still lies instinctively behind these things that are expressed outwardly in a stammering manner. That is what matters; otherwise, one will never come to terms with these things if one does not look at them in this way. What is instinctively strived for is entirely rooted in the fundamental character of our fifth post-Atlantean epoch, which differs essentially from, for example, the previous fourth, the Greek-Latin epoch, or again from the previous third, the Egyptian-Chaldean epoch. In social relationships today, people must not exist as individual beings, but in social relationships, where they appear as groups, wanting something very specific. And they want this instinctively. Today they want what could not be wanted in the fourth post-Atlantean period, which lasted until the fifteenth century of our Christian calendar: a dignified existence, that is, reflected in the social order, a fulfillment of what this period envisages as the ideal of humanity. People today instinctively want what man is to be reflected in the social structure.

This was different in the third post-Atlantean, Egyptian-Chaldean period. And it was even different before that, in the second period. This second period, the original Persian period, still had man completely within his inner self; man was still completely inward. Then came the third post-Atlantean period, the Egyptian-Chaldean period. Then man demanded that a part of his being should appear to him in the mirror of external social reality, namely that part which is connected with the head. That is why we see that from the third post-Atlantean, the Egyptian-Chaldean period, there is a search for theocratic social institutions, for everything that relates to theocratic, in a sense religiously permeated social institutions. The rest remained instinctive; that which relates to the second human being, to the breast human being, to the breathing human being, and that which relates to the metabolic human being, remained instinctive. At that time, human beings did not yet think of seeing this in any way in the mirror image of the external order. In the ancient Persian period, there was also only an instinctive religion, which was led by the initiates of Zoroastrianism. But everything that man developed was still instinctive within him. He did not yet feel the need to see things externally in their mirror image, in the social structure. In the period that ended roughly with the founding of the ancient Roman Empire — 747 is the true date before the Christian era — and in the period preceding that date, they began to demand that what could live as a thought in their minds be rediscovered in the social order.

Then came the period that began in the eighth century, since the year 747 in the pre-Christian era, and ended with the fifteenth century after Christ, the Greek-Latin period. Then man demanded that two members of his being be reflected outwardly in the social structure: the head man and the rhythmic or breathing man, the chest man. What had been the old theocratic order was to be reflected, but now only in echoes. In fact, the actual theocratic institutions bear a great resemblance to the third post-Atlantean period, even the institutions of the Catholic Church. This continues, and what is new is what comes specifically from the Greek-Latin period: the external institutions of the res publica, those institutions that relate to the administration of external life, insofar as right and wrong and the like come into consideration. Man demands of two members of his nature that he not only carry them within himself, but that he be able to observe them externally in a mirror. For example, you cannot understand Greek culture if you do not know that the pure metabolic life, which is expressed externally in the economic structure, remains instinctive and internal, without requiring an external mirror image. No external mirror image is required for this. The tendency to demand an external mirror image only appeared in the fifteenth century AD. Study history as it really is, not as the legends that have been fabricated within our so-called historical science, and you will find outward confirmation of what I have told you for occult reasons about slavery in Greece, without the existence of which the Greek culture we so admire is unthinkable. It can only be understood in terms of social structure if one knows that this entire fourth post-Atlantean period is dominated by the striving to have a legal and religious institution on the outside, but still no other than an instinctive economic order.

And only our period, the time that begins with the fifteenth century AD, demands that we see the whole threefold human being in the image of the social outer structure in which he finds himself.

So today we must study the threefold human being because he develops the threefold instinct to have in the external structure, in the social structure, what I have told you: firstly, a spiritual realm that has self-government and self-structure; secondly, an administrative realm, a realm of security and order, a political realm, which in turn is independent within itself; and thirdly, an economic realm; and this economic realm in its external organization is demanded for the first time by our age. To see human beings realized in the image of the social structure is something that appears as an instinct only in our age. This is the deeper reason why it is no longer a mere economic instinct that is at work, but why the economic class that has just been created, the proletariat, strives to establish the economic structure as consciously as the fourth post-Atlantean period established the administrative structure of the legal system, and the third post-Atlantean period, the Egyptian-Chaldean period established the theocratic structure.

This is the inner reason, my dear friends. Only if you look at this inner reason can you correctly assess the conditions of the present. Then you will also understand why I had to present this threefold social order to you eight days ago. It is truly not invented, as countless societies invent programs today, but it is spoken from the forces that can be observed when one looks at the reality of evolution. It must be achieved that the evolutionary impulses that are in the development of humanity are understood in a truly concrete and objective way. Time is pressing for this. People are still resisting it. It is remarkable when one considers even those who go furthest. Recently, “Letters from a Woman to Walther Rathenau; on the Transcendence of Coming Things” appeared. This book already speaks of various things. For example: “The present volume is intended to publish the essential content of a series of letters. Personal communication has been omitted insofar as it is not directly related to the subject matter. This results in a fragmentary letter form, in which the constant repetition of customary salutations and closings has been avoided. A woman with clairvoyant abilities recounts her unusual experiences and knowledge about the new spirit of the times and the new world coming into being, in opposition to the author of the book “Von kommenden Dingen” (Of Things to Come). The forces of the future, which are struggling today for a higher form of life, are revealed here in an individual human destiny as the lived reality of the new spiritual powers.

Now it is strange that many things are already mentioned here, but there is something curious: this woman comes to the conclusion that human beings can develop higher spiritual abilities and that only through these abilities can one see true reality. This basically concludes the book, whose last chapter is entitled: “Cosmic Concluding Remarks on the World Soul and the Human Soul. “ But it does not go beyond the insight that human beings can have certain higher abilities; it does not go as far as what one can now see with these higher abilities. It is like lecturing to a person: “You have eyes,” but not allowing them to see anything of reality with those eyes. It is strange how certain people take the position on spiritual science today. They recoil when one begins to speak of what can now be seen. One would like to say to such an author: You admit that higher faculties can develop in human beings. Spiritual science is there to tell us what we see in important matters when these higher faculties are developed. But people shy away from this; they do not want to hear it yet.

You see how urgently the time is pressing to get to where spiritual science wants to go, and how at the same time the things I spoke about in the last essay of Bernus's “Reich” are piling up in human beings in my essay: “The Luciferic and Ahrimanic in their relationship to the human being.” This is piling up in the human soul to such an extent that even those who admit that one can see a spiritual reality still regard those who speak of this spiritual reality, which they themselves admit is the true reality, as fantasists.

I mentioned this lady because she is not an isolated case, but because what occurs in her occurs in many cases, because it is characteristic that people are urged to look beyond the ordinary external reality, but do not want to, do not do so. This book points out, for example, how human beings have a certain affinity with cosmic forces. But one must not come and lecture people on the contents of my “Secret Science,” in which these relationships are developed! They shy away from it. But you cannot gain insight into social matters, which must be viewed as I have described to you, if you only allow yourself to believe that it is possible to see, and do not allow yourself to see what can be seen. It is of tremendous importance to really understand this. Otherwise, one will always fall into the error that was already hinted at in the very first sentence spoken today, namely, that one absolutizes what is concrete for the individual, that one asks, for example, with reference to the social question: How should human institutions be organized throughout the whole world? — But this question does not arise at all. People are different across the Earth. And especially in the future, this difference will become more and more apparent, despite all internationalism. And the consequence will be that those who believe that one can socialize in Russia just as in China, just as in South America, in Germany or in France, who express absolute ideas where individual, relative ideas alone correspond to reality, will be expressing a completely unrealistic idea. It is extremely important to bear this in mind.

It has been my great sorrow in recent years, when it would have been so necessary for these things to be understood in the right places, that they have not been understood. You will remember that two years ago I drew a map here, which is now coming true. And I did not draw this map just for you. I wanted to show this map at that time in order to explain how the impulses are coming from a certain side, because it is a law that if one knows these impulses, if one allows oneself to be influenced by them, if one takes them into consciousness and corrects them in a certain way, they can be directed in a different direction. It is very important to understand this. But no one could be found who would have been willing to engage with these things, who would have taken them seriously in a real sense. That they were to be taken seriously is shown by today's events.

The fact that must be taken into account here is that certain fundamental laws of world evolution are actually known today to a greater extent, and in such a way that this knowledge is also applied externally, only within certain secret societies of the British-speaking population. This is something that is important to bear in mind. Secret societies among other populations are basically just empty phrases. Secret societies within the British-speaking population, on the other hand, are sources from which, through certain methods that I may discuss at some point, but which would take us too far afield today, truths are gained that can be used to steer things politically. So one can say that the forces that flow from these secret societies into Western politics are in line with history in a meaningful sense. They reckon with the laws of historical development. It is not always necessary for everything to be perfect in outward appearance; what matters is whether one is acting in accordance with the laws of historical development in a meaningful sense, or whether one is acting amateurishly, merely following arbitrary ideas.

In the most eminent sense, Central European politics, for example, was an amateurish policy that was godforsaken by all historical laws. A non-amateurish, appropriate, or, if I may use the bourgeois expression, professional policy was the policy of the British-speaking population, the British Empire, and its appendage, America. That is the big difference, that is what is important and must be taken into account. It is important because what is known in those circles is already flowing into reality. It also flows into the instincts of those people who then outwardly stand in their places and are representative politicians, even if they act solely out of political instinct. Behind them stand the forces I have just hinted at. You therefore need not ask whether Northcliffe or even Lloyd George are to this or that degree privy to the forces in question. That is not at all important, but rather whether there is a possibility that they will behave in accordance with these forces. They only need to absorb into their instincts what lies in the direction of their forces. But this exists; it happens. And these forces work in the direction of world history. That is the essential thing. And one can only act favorably in the context of world history if one really consciously accepts what is happening in the world in this way. Otherwise, the other person, who consciously acts or allows things to happen in accordance with world history, always has the power, and the one who knows nothing has no power. In this way, power can triumph over powerlessness. That is an external event. But the victory of power over powerlessness ultimately boils down to the difference between knowledge and ignorance. That is what must be taken into account.

And it is important that the chaos now brewing in Eastern and Central Europe shows, on the one hand, how terrible everything was that pretended to bring state order into this chaos and has now been swept away; but on the other hand, what is happening in Central and Eastern Europe shows that amateurism in this area pervades public life. In the West, among the English-speaking population of the world, there is no amateurism at all; everywhere there is—as I said, if I may use the bourgeois expression—expert consideration of these matters.

But this is what will shape the history of the coming decades. No matter how lofty the ideals may be in Central and Eastern Europe, one may have all the good will in the world in this or that program, none of it will amount to anything as long as one is unable to draw on impulses that are taken equally or better from beyond the threshold of consciousness, just as, in the final analysis, the impulses of the West are taken from beyond the threshold of consciousness by the British-speaking population.

Those friends who have at least listened to the things I have been saying for years, as I am saying to you today, have always made a mistake in these matters, a mistake that even our best friends find difficult to shake off, a mistake that stems from the idea that Yes, what good does it do to tell people that certain things originate from secret centers in the West? You have to first convince them that such secret societies exist! This was often considered fundamental: to awaken the belief that such secret societies exist. But that is not what one should focus on in the first place. You will find little sympathy if you try to teach a statesman of Kühlmann's caliber that there are secret societies that have such impulses. But that is not the point. It is even a mistake to regard this as fundamental. The fact that one starts from this as a fundamental principle stems only from the secrecy that also exists among anthroposophists, carried over from the bad habits of the old Theosophical Society. People think that if they use the word secret or occult and can point to something secret or occult, they are giving themselves a very special status. But that is not what has a beneficial effect when it comes to external reality. What matters is to show how things happen, to simply point to what everyone can understand with their common sense.

Within those societies that cultivated such occult truths that point to reality, the following sentence was uttered, for example: One must pursue a policy whereby, after the Russian Empire has been overthrown for the good of the Russian people, Russia will be given the opportunity to undertake socialist experiments that Western countries do not want to undertake because they would not prove advantageous or desirable there. — As long as I say that this was said in secret societies, one can doubt it. But when one points out that the entire political leadership is based on this statement, then one is standing in reality with ordinary common sense, and that is what it is all about: awakening a sense of reality.

What has developed in Russia is basically only a realization of what is wanted in the West. These societies know so well that clumsy socialist experiments are still being carried out by non-English speakers, that things are being realized in all sorts of twists and turns, that this does not cause them any particular headache; for they know that the point is to bring these countries to the point where socialist experiments are necessary. If you can keep them ignorant of a social order, then you can impose that social order on them, and then you become the ruler of socialist experiments.

You see, there is tremendous power in withholding a certain kind of occult knowledge, which is very carefully cultivated in these centers. And there is no salvation from this power except by acquiring knowledge from the other side and using it against them. In this area, one does not speak of guilt or innocence; in this area, one simply speaks of necessities, of things that must come because they are already at work in the underground, in the realm of forces that are not yet phenomena but are already forces and will become phenomena.

I hardly need to emphasize that I stand by what I have always said: that the true essence of German culture cannot perish. This true essence of German culture must find its own way. But that is precisely the point: that it can find its way, that it does not seek it on false paths, on paths of ignorance. So do not interpret what I am about to say as somehow contradicting what I have said over the years; for there are two sides to everything, and what I have indicated is in many respects a desire. It can, of course, be paralyzed if forces from the other side are also at work; but these must be based on knowledge, not on amateurish ignorance.

You see, what matters is this: If no resistance is raised from the East—and by the East I mean everything from the Rhine eastward to Asia—then British world domination will develop with the decline of the Roman-Latin French element, in accordance with the intentions of those forces which I have described today, and have often described before, as lying behind instincts. They lie behind instincts. It is therefore important not merely to approach what Woodrow Wilson says with the thinking that has been instilled in people today, but to understand with deeper knowledge what even in people like Woodrow Wilson is only instinctive, what is then formulated in all kinds of sentences that beguile people, but which come only from the soul in question because that soul is possessed in a certain way by subconscious forces.

What is at stake is that in the circles of the West that keep their knowledge secret, great care is taken to ensure that certain things develop in such a way that the West gains dominion over the East under all circumstances. People today may say whatever they want in their consciousness, but what is being strived for is to establish a ruling caste in the West and an economic slave caste in the East, beginning at the Rhine and extending eastward to Asia. Not a slave caste in the ancient Greek sense, but an economic slave caste, a slave caste that is to be organized along socialist lines, that is to absorb all the impossibilities of a social structure, but which is then not to be applied to the English-speaking population. That is what this is all about: making the English-speaking population the ruling population of the earth.

Now, this is correctly thought from that point of view in the most comprehensive sense. And I come now to explain something which I ask you to take in really, so that you are aware that when such things are said today, they are said under the pressure and urge of the events of the time and must truly not be taken in an unserious sense. What I am saying here is kept carefully secret by the centers in the West, which I have often referred to. And it is taken for granted in the West that the people of the East should know nothing about these things, which, as I said earlier, are known to them through methods which I may also discuss later, and known in such a way that, because others should not know these things — and this is the only way it can be — they want to use them to establish world domination.

You see, from this fifth post-Atlantean period onwards, very specific forces will arise in the evolution of humanity. Humanity is developing forward. One can never gain an insight into the forces that arise in human evolution from the short period of time that can be observed anthropologically or historically in external materialistic science. For in this short period of time that we can observe anthropologically or historically in external development, very little has changed. With this science, we do not know how things looked completely different in the second period, let alone in the first period or even further back. This can only be known through spiritual science. And so it is only with spiritual science that we can point to those forces which will develop in the future from human nature itself in a very elementary way. That such forces, which will transform life on earth, will develop out of human beings is known in those secret centers. This is what people want to keep secret from the East, what they want to keep to themselves as knowledge. And it is also known that these abilities, which humans today have only in their very beginnings, will be of three kinds. They will develop out of human nature in the same way that other abilities have arisen in the course of human evolution.

I must explain to you in a plausible way these threefold abilities, which every knowledgeable person within these secret circles speaks of and which will develop in human nature. First, there are the abilities of so-called material occultism. Through these abilities — and this is precisely the ideal of the British secret societies — certain social forms that today underlie industrialization are to be placed on a completely different foundation. Every knowledgeable member of these secret circles knows that, simply through certain abilities that are still latent in human beings today but are developing, it will be possible, with the help of the law of resonant vibrations, to set machines, mechanical devices, and other things in motion on a large scale. You will find a small hint of this in what I have linked to the character of Strader in my Mystery Dramas.

These things are now in the making. These things are kept secret within those secret circles in the field of material occultism. There are motors which, by knowing the relevant vibration curve, can be set in motion with very little human influence. This will make it possible to replace much of what human power is needed for today with purely mechanical forces. Today there are already fourteen hundred million people on earth; but it is not only these fourteen hundred million who do the work—I have explained this here before—but so much work is done by purely mechanical means that one can say the earth is actually populated by two billion people; the others are simply machines; that is to say, if the work done by machines had to be done by humans without machines, there would have to be six hundred million more people living on earth. But when what I now call mechanical occultism enters the realm of practical effectiveness, which is the ideal of those secret centers, it will not only be possible to provide work for five or six hundred million people, but for a thousand million or more.

This will make it possible for nine-tenths of human labor to become unnecessary within the English-speaking world. But mechanical occultism not only makes it possible to dispense with nine-tenths of the work that is still done by human hands today, it also makes it possible to paralyze any rebellious movement of the then dissatisfied masses. The ability to set motors in motion according to the laws of harmonious vibrations will develop extensively among the English-speaking population. This is known in those secret circles. It is expected to give them supremacy over the rest of the world's population during the fifth post-Atlantean period.

But those circles know something else. They know that two other abilities will also develop. One ability will develop which I would like to call the eugenic ability. And this eugenic ability will develop excellently among the people of the East, among the people of Russia and the Asian hinterland. And it is also known in those secret circles of the West that this eugenic occultism will not develop from the innate predispositions of the British-speaking population, but from the innate predispositions of the Asian and Russian populations. These facts are known in the secret circles of the West, and they are counting on it. They are counted on as certain impulses that must be active in the development of the future. I call eugenic ability the elevation of human reproduction above mere arbitrariness and chance. Within the population of the East, an instinctively clear knowledge will develop which will know how the laws of population must run parallel to certain cosmic phenomena; how, by arranging conception in accordance with certain constellations of the stars, one can cause well-disposed or ill-disposed souls to gain access to earthly incarnation. Only those people who form the racial continuation, the blood continuation of the Asian population, will be able to acquire the ability to see clearly how what today seems chaotic and arbitrary in its effect on the earth—conception, birth—can be brought into harmony with the great laws of the cosmos in individual, concrete cases. Abstract laws are of no use here; what is acquired is a concrete ability that will know in each individual case: now there can be a conception, or now there cannot be a conception.

This knowledge, which will be able to draw down from heaven the impulses for the moralization or demoralization of the earth through the nature of man himself, this special ability develops as a continuation of the blood ability in the races of the East, and I call what develops there as an ability eugenic occultism. This is the second ability that will prevent the evolution of humanity with regard to conception and birth from proceeding arbitrarily, more or less by chance in the world. And now look at the enormous social consequences, at the enormous social impulse that this brings with it! These abilities are latent. It is well known in those secret circles of the British-speaking population that these abilities will develop in the population of the East. It is known that one will not have them oneself in one's innate predispositions. It is known that the earth could not reach its goal, could not get from the earth to Jupiter, and that even relatively soon the earth would turn away from its goal if only the forces of the West were at work. If only the mechanical occult abilities of the West were used, then gradually a soulless population would develop in the West, a population that would become as soulless as possible. This is known. Therefore, within their own circles, they strive to develop what they can through their abilities: mechanical occultism; and they strive to dominate the population that develops eugenic occultism. Every knowledgeable person in Western circles says: It is necessary that we dominate India, for example, because only in the continuation of what comes from Indian bodies — when it combines with what in the West is moving in a completely different direction, toward purely mechanical occultism — will bodies arise in which souls can incarnate in the future and carry the Earth forward to its future stages of development. The English-speaking occultists know that they must renounce the bodies that come from their own national foundation, and they strive to gain dominion over a population that will supply bodies with the help of which the development of the earth can be carried forward into the future.

The American occultists know that only if they cultivate from themselves that what is developing within the Russian population in terms of bodies of the future through eugenic occult predisposition, if they master this so that a social connection gradually comes about between their dying racial characteristics and the budding psychic racial characteristics of European Russia, that only then can they carry over into the future what they want to carry over.

I must tell you about a third ability that is latent today and will develop. It is what I would like to call the hygienic occult ability. Now we have all three: the material occult ability, the eugenic occult ability, and the hygienic occult ability. This hygienic occult ability is well on its way and will not be long in coming. This ability will simply mature through the realization that human life, from birth to death, follows a process that is identical to the process of illness. Disease processes are merely special and radical transformations of the completely ordinary, normal life process that runs between birth and death, except that we carry within us not only the forces that cause disease, but also the forces that heal. And these healing forces, as every occultist knows, are exactly the same as those that are used when one acquires occult abilities by transforming these forces into knowledge. The healing power inherent in the human organism, transformed into knowledge, gives rise to occult knowledge.

Every knowledgeable person in Western circles knows that materialistic medicine will have no basis in the future. For at the moment when hygienic-occult abilities develop, there will be no need for external material medicine, but it will be possible to treat and prevent those diseases that do not arise from karmic causes and are therefore uninfluenceable by psychic means. Everything will change in this respect. This still seems like mere fantasy today, but it is something that will come about very soon.

The only thing is that these three abilities will not come to all people on earth at the same time. You have already seen the differentiation. This differentiation has, of course, only to do with the bodies, not with the souls, which always pass from race to race and from people to people; but this differentiation has a great deal to do with the bodies. The ability to develop eugenic-occult abilities through birth will never emerge from the bodies of the English-speaking population in the future. They will be applied precisely in the West, but they will be applied by dominating Easterners and bringing about marriages between Westerners and Easterners; by using what can only be learned from Easterners.

The people of the Middle Lands are particularly predisposed to hygienic-occult abilities. And the fact is that the English-speaking population cannot acquire hygienic-occult abilities through birth, but can acquire these abilities in the course of development between birth and death. There they can become acquired characteristics. And among the population roughly east of the Rhine to Asia, they will be present at birth. And again, it is so that the population of the Middle Lands cannot acquire the eugenic-occult predisposition directly through birth, but can acquire it in the course of life if they go into apprenticeship with the people of the East. Thus these abilities will be distributed. The people of the East will have no ability whatsoever for material occultism; they will only be able to receive it if it is given to them, if it is not kept secret from them. And one can always find ways to keep it secret, especially when others are so foolish as not to believe the things said by someone who is once in a position to gain some insight into these matters. So the people of the East and the people of the Middle Lands will have to receive material occultism from the West. They will receive the blessings — the products. Hygienic occultism will develop primarily in the Middle Lands, eugenic occultism in the Eastern countries. But communication will have to take place between people. This is something that must be incorporated into the social impulses of the future; it is something that makes it necessary for people to realize that in the future they can only live as a unified humanity across the entire Earth. For if Americans wanted to live only as Americans, they would indeed be able to achieve the highest material effect, but they would condemn themselves to never being able to progress beyond the Earth's development. If they did not seek social relations with the East, they would condemn themselves, as souls, to be banished to the Earth after some incarnation and to haunt only within the Earth's sphere. The Earth would be lifted out of its cosmic context, and all these souls would have to haunt it. The man of the East, on the other hand, would lose the earth if he did not take in, with his eugenic-occult abilities, that which pulls down to the earth, the materialism of the West. They would merely be drawn into some kind of psychic-spiritual development and would lose the development of the earth; the earth would sink beneath them, as it were, and they would not be able to enjoy the fruits of the earth's development.

Trust among human beings in the deepest sense must arise. This is precisely what the remarkable human development of the future shows. It is entirely reasonable for the centers of the West to cultivate things only as they are able to do so. It is not for the people of the West to pay particular attention to what is developing in the East from the point of view of the people of the East; what develops among others must be left to others. This is what we must engrave deeply in our souls: that a point has been reached where guilt or innocence or similar concepts lose their meaning altogether, where it is a matter of taking things seriously in the deepest sense, because they contain knowledge that alone is capable of guiding humanity in the future.

It is very important to view these things in a certain way. For consider that across the earth, differentiated according to the different peoples, according to the people of the West, the Middle Lands, and the East, three kinds of occult abilities are developing which, in a sense, devour each other, intertwining in such a way that the people of the West have a predisposition to material occultism from birth, but can acquire hygienic occultism; that people from the Middle Lands have a predisposition from birth for hygienic occultism, but can acquire material occultism from the West and eugenic occultism from the East if it is given to them; that people from the East have a predisposition from birth for eugenic occultism, but can acquire hygienic occultism from the Middle Lands. These abilities are distributed in a differentiated manner among the people of the earth, but at the same time in such a way that they intertwine. And it is precisely through these intertwining that the future social bond will be formed across the whole earth.

Now, however, there are obstacles to the development of these abilities; and these are manifold in nature, and their effect is actually quite complicated. For example, a significant obstacle for people in the Middle and Eastern countries is to consciously develop the abilities that are to come, if they have strong antipathies toward people in the Western countries and cannot view these things objectively. This is an obstacle to the development of these abilities. On the other hand, in a certain way, the predisposition to a later occult ability is even supported if it is developed out of certain instincts of hatred. This is a very peculiar phenomenon. For one often asks oneself – and here lies something that should be viewed quite objectively – why there has been such senseless ranting in the West. This is also instinctively aimed at these abilities. For nothing will promote what lies in the deepest impulses of Western occultism more than the development of false feelings that are perceived as sacred, which the people of the East, especially the people of the Middle Lands, can portray as “barbaric.” Material occult tendencies are promoted, for example, by the mood that prevails in America, the so-called “crusade mood.” This consists in the belief that America is called upon to bring freedom and justice, and I don't even know what all the other wonderful things are, to the whole world. People believe this as a matter of course. I am not making any accusations here. People believe that they are on a crusade. But it is precisely in believing what is wrong that support for a certain direction lies. If one were to consciously say what is wrong, one would not have this support. So, on the one hand, what is happening now is infinitely beneficial, but on the other hand, it hinders the development of those abilities which, it must be said, are still latent in most people today, but which want to develop in the future and which will have a profound impact on the social structure of the people of the future.

Just think how everything that is happening in the present will be imbued and saturated with understanding and insight when you consider these background factors, when you realize that behind everything that is consciously said today in many cases lie subconscious instincts corresponding to these explanations! The most important fact here, however, is that, through very special evolutionary processes, the English-speaking population has such secret occult centers that know these things, that know what abilities they will have in the future as members of the English-speaking population and what abilities they will lack, and therefore also know how they must organize the social structure so that they can put what they lack at their service. However, instincts work in the direction of such things, and these instincts have already worked, they have worked tremendously, they have worked significantly.

A particularly useful means of steering things in the wrong direction, which can be prompted by Western occult knowledge, is to influence the East in such a way that it retains its old tendency to develop mere religion without science in the future. The leaders of the Western secret circles will ensure that something that is neither mere religion nor mere science, but the synthesis of both, the interaction of knowledge and faith, does not exist there. But they will also ensure that the science that otherwise also permeates the content of religion will only work in secret, that it will only permeate the more important affairs of humanity and the political leadership of the earth in the achievement of British world domination. It will be of tremendous help in the spread of this world domination if the East does not permeate religious ideas with science as much as possible.

Now think how everything Russian is conducive to this Western striving. On the one hand, there is still a desire in Russia today to be pious, but not to penetrate the content of piety with spiritual science, to remain, as it were, in an unclear mysticism. This unclear mysticism would be a good means of promoting what the West wants as supremacy over the East.

On the other hand, it is a matter of making science, which is for the earth, as atheistic as possible. And in this, the culture of the British-speaking population has been tremendously fruitful in recent times. This British-speaking population truly has no cause for complaint. It has achieved tremendous things, for it has spread its scientific direction, religionless science, atheistic science, basically all over the earth. It has become the ruler of the whole earth. Goetheanism, which is quite consciously the opposite of this, could not even arise in Goethe's own country; it is a fairly unknown thing even in Goethe's country! What dominates science today as intellect is entirely in keeping with what is to become apparent as the outward expression of the science cultivated in secret by the circles, but cultivated there as a synthesis between science and religion. For the outside world, there should only be atheistic science; for the inner circles, which are supposed to guide the course of world events, there should be a science that is at the same time religion, and a religion that is at the same time science.

The best way to control the East is to keep it in a state of religious ignorance. The best way to control the Middle Lands is to graft a religion onto them, because they will not allow themselves to be grafted onto a religion, and to graft a religionless science onto them. These things are promoted quite consciously by those who stand as knowledgeable in the aforementioned circles, and instinctively by the others. And after the ruling powers of the Middle Lands, which originate from a bygone era, have been swept away, there is initially nothing in the Middle Lands that can take their place. This is what makes it so difficult to correctly assess the entire world-historical situation of the present. The whole world has been preoccupied with the question of the guilt or the cause of this warlike catastrophe. But all these things can only be illuminated when viewed against the background of those forces that do not manifest themselves in external phenomena. These things cannot be judged according to the categories, according to the categories of thought, by which one usually judges when raising the question of guilt or innocence—precisely for the reasons I have explained to you today.

I know very well that today, when even Wilson is called the Pope of the twentieth century, not in a derogatory sense but in an approving sense, because he is rightly the lay pope of the twentieth century, even in the Middle Lands a clouded judgment will gradually develop about the course of this world war, as it is called, because the real issues will not be taken into account. Every document will prove what I am saying. But the documents must be seen in their proper context. Above all, it must be possible to form an opinion. In this case, that opinion can only be formed by those who can shed some light on things from beyond the threshold. For you see, I fear that through the things that are now coming to light, day after day, so to speak, increasingly false judgments will prevail, that fewer and fewer people will be inclined to address the question in a way that could be fruitful. I believe that people will have strange thoughts when they now learn, for example, from the newspapers—whether it may be true or not, but it could be true—that the abdicated German emperor says: “I wasn't even there when the war was made—you will have read it in the latest newspapers—Bethmann and Jagow did it!”

It is, of course, unheard of for such a thing to be uttered by him, unheard of, of course! But everywhere there are secretly influenced judgments that then go astray because of such things. You see, what is at stake here is that one must take the facts very precisely into account in order to be able to ask the right questions. Then you will see that you really cannot grasp the deep, tragic necessity underlying this catastrophe as superficially as is so often the case. Even superficial events must not be viewed superficially.

I would like to draw your attention to one case; you will see immediately why I am singling out this particular detail. Some time ago, I explained here that there were certainly many series of events and facts in Germany that could have led to war, but that they were interrupted and did not lead to war, while what actually led to war only began very late, based on certain preconditions, and was completely unrelated to the other events. I do not want to repeat today what I have already said to you in this regard, but I would like to give you something to think about today so that you can see how, in world history, things that appear to be external symptoms collapse, while the great things behind them, which I have spoken to you about today, remain standing.

You see, one can raise the question: Could the entire catastrophic war that began in July or August 1914 have taken a different course than it did? I do not want to go into whether this catastrophe could have been avoided or not; that is another matter. But I want to raise the question: Could this catastrophe have taken a different course? Well, it could have taken a different course; that is entirely conceivable, although saying such things after the event, I would say, has only methodological value. But it would be conceivable, given the events and also the occult background, that the whole catastrophe could have taken a different course. One must judge layer by layer. What I am saying now, of course, applies only to a certain layer of facts. And within this layer of facts, one can judge as follows. One can say: It would also have been conceivable that the war in 1914 would have begun in such a way that the German army would have marched eastward and waited to see whether the outbreak of war in the east would be followed by war in the west. It would have been conceivable that the main body of the German army would have marched against Russia, that a purely defensive stance would have been maintained against the West, and that one would have waited to see whether the French, who in this case would not have had any alliance obligations, would attack. They would not have had any alliance obligations at that moment if war had not been declared in the east, but had waited until the Russian armies actually invaded. They would have invaded; there is no question that they would have invaded. I am not claiming that five years earlier there might not have been a different hypothesis that could have led in a different direction, but in 1914 it was no longer possible. Within this set of facts, one could imagine that the war would have taken a fundamental turn toward the east. That would have been possible. And yet it was impossible. It was actually impossible for the simple reason that there was no German campaign plan for the east. No one ever thought that the war could begin in any other way than Germany being provoked into attacking Russia, which would then trigger the Franco-Russian alliance, and that Germany would then have to fight a war on two fronts.

Now, under the axiom that had developed within German strategy since the beginning of the twentieth century, it was assumed that this war on two fronts could only be waged offensively. All that existed was the campaign plan, which was to march through Belgium, quickly force France to accept a separate peace—which was certainly an illusion, but these were the illusions that existed at the time—and then throw the masses of troops eastward. Now I ask you to consider what such a strategic plan is. It is calculated down to every detail, for every day. It calculates exactly how long it can take from the day on which the Russian general mobilization begins until the first order is given for the German mobilization, which then cannot wait but must continue because the initial impetus is the Russian general mobilization. On the day after that, on the second day after that, on the third day after that, this and that must happen. If you wait just one day after the Russian general mobilization, the whole plan is thrown into disarray and can no longer be carried out. That is what I ask you to consider, that something like this was actually decisive at a time when there was no Central European policy whatsoever. That is, of course, the essential point, that there was no Central European policy. For Bethmann is still talking nonsense today. People were desperate when Bethmann said the most incredible, the most impossible things in the German Reichstag; but he is still saying them today. There was no policy at all, only strategy, but a strategy based on a very specific case. Nothing could be changed, not even in the space of an hour.

I therefore ask you to consider that, given the external circumstances, no one in Germany needed to want war; it had to happen. There was no need to want it. I ask you to take this into account. It had to happen, simply because, quite automatically—naturally, at the moment when Russia issues orders for total mobilization, as if the hands of a clock were moving to twelve—the German army commander thinks: Now I must mobilize. And from that point on, everything happens automatically. It does not arise from will, it arises because it has been prepared for years. The Russian general mobilization is automatically followed by the invasion of Belgium and France, because this is seen as the only reasonable course of action. It was impossible to tell the Kaiser, because, as I have already told you, it was known that he was so indiscreet that if you told him today, the whole world would know tomorrow. He only learned of the invasion of Belgium at the moment when mobilization began. Similar things happened on a massive scale. I ask you to take these things into account, and then you will say to yourself: Of course, there was no need for anyone within Germany to want this—the war had to happen. I say: If you stick to this version of events. Of course, you can move on to a different version of events, but then you will come up against some very complicated questions.

It is really the case that something great, something that will become a catastrophe for humanity, is reminiscent of the story of the good headmaster Kaltenbrunner, which I told you with reference to Hamerling. You remember that I told you: When you consider Robert Hamerling's poetic personality and understand it, you say to yourself: What is at work in this personality stems largely from the fact that he came to Trieste at a certain point in time as a high school teacher and was able to spend his vacations in Venice, that he came to the shores of the Adriatic. The entire inner structure of Hamerling's soul depends on the fact that he was able to spend ten years as a high school teacher—for that was all he could be, given his background—in Trieste on the Adriatic. But how did he get there? I have told you: when he was a substitute teacher in Graz, he wrote a letter of application for a vacant position in Budapest. Now think about it: he wrote a letter of application; if the authorities had received and approved it, Hamerling would have spent the entire ten years in Budapest. The whole poetic personality would have been lost, it would not have existed; anyone who knows him knows that. What caused him not to go to Budapest but to Trieste? The good rector Kaltenbrunner, to whom the application had to be submitted first, dawdled over it and left it in his drawer until the position in Budapest was filled. And when the position was filled and Hamerling said, “For God's sake, I would have loved to have the job in Budapest!” — the good rector Kaltenbrunner blushed and said, “Oh God, I completely forgot, it's still in my drawer!” And Hamerling was saved from going to Budapest. The next time Hamerling applied for a position in Trieste, after this incident, the good rector Kaltenbrunner did not forget to pass it on, and Hamerling came to Trieste and became “the Hamerling.” Now I ask you: Did the good rector Kaltenbrunner make Hamerling a poet? Nevertheless, there is no other cause among the external phenomena than that Hamerling became “the Hamerling” through the dawdling of the good Kaltenbrunner, rector in Graz in Styria. It is only possible to get to the bottom of things by studying symptomatology, because this symptomatology leads one to assess external phenomena in the right way and to see what lies behind the symptoms. That is what is important. That is what I want to achieve more and more.

When you look at the catastrophe of the present, you certainly do not find an easy way out of the turmoil. Just consider the great difficulty that exists. Let us assume that Mr. Grey wanted to prove, based solely on external documents, that he was completely innocent of the outbreak of war. Of course, this can be proven very easily. One can prove quite strictly from external documents that the British government is innocent of the outbreak of this war. But everywhere it is a question of the weight of the evidence. You can only get to the bottom of this if you ask the question as I have been asking it here for years: Would the British government have been in a position to prevent the invasion of Belgium, for example? You must answer: Yes, it would have been in a position to do so. For that is precisely what I demanded in my memorandum, that the facts be presented to the world in plain language. On the one hand, this would of course have meant that the gentleman who has now defected to Holland would have had to disappear somehow at that time. Perhaps this has something to do with the fact that my memorandum met with so little approval, even among those who were in a position to judge it. But I demanded that the events be recounted minute by minute, simply, without embellishment, as they unfolded at the same time in Berlin and London between half past four on Saturday—you know, Saturday is when the mobilization was signed in Berlin at half past four—and half past ten at night. These decisive events, untainted by anything the world has been talking about, simply recounted, prove that it would have been possible for the British government to prevent the invasion of Belgium. It was not prevented. Therefore, at half past ten on Saturday, the only order that His Majesty had brought himself to give against the will of German strategy, namely to hold back the army, not to let it march westward, but to remain on the defensive in the west—this single order was revoked at half past ten on Saturday, and the old strategy remained in place. But then the events from minute to minute, I would say, between half past four and half past ten on Saturday night really need to be recounted, just the facts, plain and simple. Then, of course, a completely different picture emerges, above all a picture that leads to the right questions being asked.

Now, it is to be feared that the world public will be influenced by what is found in the archives; but the facts, the decisive ones, which occurred on Saturday between half past four and half past ten at night, will probably never come out of the archives, because they were probably not written down at all, that is, they were written down, but they were not written down in such a way that the transcripts will be found in archives.

You see, caution in judgment is what one must also gain. If one can gain this caution in judgment, it is a great help in the development of those latent abilities of which I have just spoken to you today, which must develop in the future of humanity, differentiated into three parts throughout the earth. And then you will realize that what I described eight days ago as the only valid solution to the social question, insofar as one can speak of such a solution in the sense I have indicated, was not developed out of some intellectual thought as an abstract program.