How Can Mankind Find the Christ Again?
GA 187
1 January 1919, Dornach
VIII. Experiences of the Old Year and Outlook over the New Year II
A ray of light illumines the kind of retrospect we were engaged in yesterday evening if we take pains to consider the negative side of the matter. We might ask ourselves the following question—it has, of course, often been asked before: What are the deeper impulses that brought mankind to today's catastrophic events? Particularly, and more important, what are the deeper impulses that brought mankind to the catastrophic mood that is clearly to be perceived in these events? Obviously, we are not always able to look directly into the deeper causes that underlie events in time. Our gaze must turn first to what may be said to lie more on the surface of happenings. It is then possible to describe this or that, and such descriptions will by no means be incorrect. This is not to be overlooked by someone intending to observe earnestly in the manner of spiritual science. A spiritual scientific observer certainly does not wish to say that everything is wrong. But one would like to point out that when someone observes the world today it does not suffice—at this present moment in time—to stop short at what is on the surface; it is necessary to go more deeply into conditions. In this respect there is nothing exactly new to be said today; rather, we should place before our souls all that contributes to our view of the New Year that confronts us so frighteningly.
You remember, I said recently that it belongs to the most essential, the most supremely important present-day knowledge that mankind is standing before a new revelation. This is the revelation that is to take place, from a certain aspect is already taking place, through the Spirits of Personality who—if it may be so expressed—are now rising to the new height of Creators. In the history of mankind up to the present day, we have only been able to attribute this capacity to the Spirits who in the Bible are called the Elohim, and whom we call the Spirits of Form. Thus, something creative will occur in what we can observe as we follow the events of the outer world.
Now it is characteristic of human nature that at first people will be averse to recognizing any such intervention of a spiritual element. Particularly at the present time there is no desire to understand such a spiritual intervention. The moment we do give our attention to it, we will have to distinguish between two things.
To make this more intelligible, I would like to say the following: At his investment in Rome the famous Cardinal Newman made a remarkable statement. He said that he saw no salvation for the Church except in a new revelation. This happened decades ago; since then, various reactions have been expressed at one place or another to this remarkable view of Cardinal Newman's.21Cardinal Newman: England, 1801–1890. Led Oxford movement in the Church of England. 1845, investment in Roman Catholic Church; became cardinal-deacon. And when one examines what has been said on the side of the Church and by those related to the Church creed, one finds a universal opinion that the talk should not be of a new revelation, but far rather of holding fast to the old revelation, that if anything is necessary it is first and foremost that the old revelation should be better understood than has so far been the case.
In the objections that were raised on all sides to this pronouncement by the Cardinal—who indeed had an intuition of the breaking-in of a new revelation—we can see how mankind opposes any such revelation. As I said, there are two things here to be distinguished. Mankind's struggle against receiving such a revelation is obviously not going to change the fact of its coming. It surges through the events in which man is entangled like a new wave of the spirit; man cannot push it back from the earth. It pours out over the earth. This is the one fact.
Let me say it this way: For some time, especially from the beginning of the twentieth century—to be exact, since the year 1899—as we human beings come and go about the world, we have been immersed in a new wave of spiritual life that is pouring into the common life of all mankind. And a modern spiritual investigator is simply a person who acknowledges this fact. He is someone who is aware that such an event has intervened in the life of mankind. This is the one fact.
The other fact is this, that people, by the very reason of their present attitude, need a certain shaking-up, a certain rousing, in order to notice that this wave is indeed pouring into their life. So there is a significant situation: on the one hand, the wave is actually pouring itself into life and is there; on the other hand, people refuse to notice it. They fight against it. And don't take what I say as mere imagery! For the centers, the coherers into which this wave discharges—in just the same way as the electric current in wireless telegraphy—in this sphere the coherers are human souls. Don't be deceived for a moment! For it is fact, that just by living on the earth as men of the twentieth century, human beings are the receiving apparatus for what pours into life as I have described. People may struggle against admitting this into their consciousness, but they cannot prevent their souls from receiving the impact of this spiritual wave. Nor can they prevent it from entering them.
This fact must be examined more closely. Various hypotheses must now be considered after our deliberations of the last weeks. If one asks what is the most important faculty of the human soul in our epoch, the answer is: intellectuality. And if today some people maintain—quite justifiably—that one should not just develop intellectuality but also other soul forces, their emphasis is insistent because a modern person does indeed feel that intellectuality is now the outstanding faculty, but that as it floods in upon him, he should not simply allow his other capacities to be stunted. It is because intellectuality does play such an important role today in this age of the consciousness soul that we are so frequently warned not to let our feelings become cramped. This is tremendously important.
But now we must gain a clear idea concerning this intellectuality. You know that I have spoken about it from the most varied points of view. Even in the public lectures I have not hesitated to say what was necessary about the intellectual element in our present age. I have shown, for instance, how the present scientific world conception makes particular use of it. This world conception has fastened its hold on people in all walks of life; everyone thinks in conformity with it even when he knows nothing at all about science. When someone experiments, even when someone simply observes, he works out the experiments and the results of the experiments, even his observations, with his intellect. Intellectuality is actively weaving and holding complete sway in the scientific world outlook to which at present mankind is so wedded. From such a standpoint, for instance, people even want to study social problems. But how does intellectuality really work into things? In my public lectures I have often raised the question: what sort of world picture is actually obtained from this scientific world conception? One finally realizes that a conception of the world acquired by the ordinary scientific way of thinking is not reality at all, but a specter, or a number of specters. This is true even of our atoms and of all ideas of the atomic world. Even those who take a more positivist stand and do not entirely subscribe to the atomic theory, persons like Poincare, Avenarius or Mach, conceive of nature in such a way that they never arrive at reality, where nature is actually at work: they only reach a specter of nature. This relates to what I said here a few days ago, that actually the world of concepts in which we are living today in this age of the consciousness soul does not contain realities but merely pictures, reflected images. And we already accomplish very much when we abandon the superstition that when we read a scientific book or hear a scientific talk, we are learning the truth. If we are really aware of what is being imparted, we know that it is only an image, a kind of specter of reality.
In a certain sense, people today cherish inordinately, love inordinately, what lives in ideas of this kind, ideas that are ghostly images and not bound up with reality—in contrast, for instance, to Goethe's thoughts on metamorphosis. And people would dearly like to confine reality to this ghostly web of ideas. All those who talk today of a monistic world conception and the like, or in any way at all establish a positivist world conception, are actually believing in a curiously superstitious way in the importance of this ghostly web. They think that out of what is given them by modern scientific perception they should be able to produce a picture of reality. This indeed cannot be done. Thus, this ghostly kind of world-picture, which can be made by people at the present stage of human evolution, is very dear to their hearts. And souls are dominated today on the one hand by their love of an imagined world, and on the other hand by the fact that this imagined world yields only pictures. Moreover, the souls dominated in this way by their longing for ideas are the same souls that are struggling against the incoming spiritual wave that is in fact the true reality. It cannot possibly be turned aside by a mere ghostly web of ideas put forward by science. One only gains a correct view of these things when one realizes that this scientific way of thinking prepares people to reject all the truly real spiritual elements that are playing into the world. It is for this reason that they oppose, violently oppose, the wave that I said is nevertheless rolling in and spreading out and already living in men's souls.
You see, there is something in modern human beings, indeed in the very people who are the most representative, something that does not like the feel of this wave. It is breaking in upon them, and there is something in their consciousness that wants to resist it. We can make a sketch of it like this. (See Diagram.) Let this be modern man; then here (I) we have one layer of the human soul, and here (II) a second layer of the human soul. In the upper layer (II) is consciousness, modern consciousness, especially well-schooled in science. But the wave I am speaking about is pressing forward through the lower layer (I). The important thing now for consciousness is that it should not simply be occupied by what becomes a ghostly web, but that it should allow what is below to flow up into it, that it should take up into itself what is there below.

If you think about this you will find something tremendously important for understanding the present constitution of the human soul. For, my dear friends, if there had not been a certain state of soul, we could never have had this terrible catastrophe of the war, or rather, the expression of this soul-catastrophe by the war. This catastrophe that is occurring in mankind takes different forms, has various aspects, and the war that has been raging for these four and a half years is only one aspect. To understand this fact of a soul-catastrophe, we must examine it minutely. One must indeed ask, what is really happening with this wave that has appeared as I have described?
This wave is still for the present below the surface of what is usually observed. One may ask, what is actually living in this wave in which the Spirits of Personality are moving? Certainly the Spirits of Personality are living in it, those Beings who want to manifest as new Creators; but also, many other things are in it. You can picture to yourselves a sea with ships moving on it, carrying the most diverse personalities travelling in this way over the waves. These may stand for us as images of the Spirits of Personality. But the waves themselves are there and they also represent something. In the sea we have, so to speak, merely the blind watery element, but this can also have its moods. And in the spiritual wave of which I am speaking, something else is present. What is flooding human souls, what is actually pushing its way into our souls, is strife, world strife. This is being enacted, one may say, behind the scenes of our modern world. Humanity is entangled in this world strife. For the spiritual investigator to perceive the Spirits of Personality is by no means an easy or comfortable matter. It is not of such a nature that one could be told: I am making you into a seer because it will give you untold happiness; you will be able to float luxuriously in spiritual perception. This would please most people. When today they are to enter the spiritual world they would like to be given something of the nature of a festive drink. They shy away if nothing is offered them that gives them a comfortable feeling of wellbeing. There can indeed be no question of this today. Today one feels permeated through and through by the strife going on behind the scenes of the world, a battle that must be waged, that must be placed into world evolution in the course this world evolution has to take.
It is possible to describe in various ways the form this world evolution has to take; I will mention only one. In old pre-Christian times, but gradually fading as the Mystery of Golgotha approached, it seemed a matter of course to souls who were observant, at least throughout the pagan world, that they had experiences revealing the reality of repeated earth-lives. Life in those olden days was on the whole quite different from the way modern man is inclined to picture it. Today—is it not so?—people are distinguished by whether they are educated or not. In ancient times a distinction was made between those who could observe repeated earth-lives and those who could not. But this knowledge had to recede, and I have often told you that it was the task of Christianity to hold back for a while this wave of evolution that normally would awaken in human beings a consciousness of reincarnation. In saying this, of course, one exposes oneself to all kinds of misunderstanding. Objections are put forward which if one were speaking more fully one would like, and be able, to put forward oneself. Recently somewhere or other I spoke on the subject, and then immediately received a letter asking whether I did not know that reincarnation was definitely spoken of in the Bible. Naturally you will find in my writings indications of where it may be found in the Bible; this goes without saying. But the question is not whether such reference can be found: the important fact is that in the Bible reincarnation is not openly referred to, not, one might say, held out in one's hand. It was indeed necessary in human evolution that for a time the consciousness of repeated earth-lives should recede, so that men would learn to live each separate earth-life fully and with all earnestness. Now, however, we face a reversal of the situation: we have reached the point where we can make no advance unless we turn our gaze to reincarnation. Now is the time when spiritual beings wishing to bring humanity the consciousness of repeated earth-lives have to wage a hard fight against those who would allow only old elements and impulses to enter human consciousness. This is a significant battle in which man must take part if he wants to see what is going on behind the scenes in either human evolution or the general evolution of the world.
We should not simply imagine that behind the scenes of physical existence there is a place where we can lay ourselves down to go pleasantly to sleep. That is the paradise usually pictured by the materialists. Their dearest dream is to have a really good sleep once they have passed through the gate of death. They love to imagine this because sleeping is, after all, very comfortable. But I'm sure you know that the matter is not like that. On the contrary, behind the scenes of physical existence we could not possibly entertain a desire to satisfy certain instincts in order to enhance our own personal egotism. Consequently, we become participants in a battle, a real battle.
Now the following is apparent: If people would not struggle against recognizing this battle, if they would prove themselves ready to look behind the scenes of life to what is described by the spiritual investigator, they would have a different outlook today on the whole of existence. I have always stressed the fact that we human beings should take an interest in one another. But this can only be a real interest if we let the light of spiritual science shine into our lives. Is it not true that when we enter into relation with someone—and we all do enter into relation with other people things happen like this: we become acquainted with people we call good, with other people whom we call neither good nor bad, and with still other people whom we call bad, who do us various kinds of harm. Certainly in external life on the physical plane we have no alternative but to relate ourselves to human beings. When someone boxes our ears and we are incited to give it right back to him in return, there is no alternative but to deal with that particular person himself. But this attitude no longer suffices for the conditions of our time. It is far more in keeping with present conditions to say to oneself: I've had my ears boxed; or someone has lied to me; this or that has been done by a human being. It is true that in physical life we have to restrict our dealings to our fellowmen, but it is important for us to realize that all kinds of spiritual forces are working in human beings with which we have to reckon. Naturally, if someone boxes our ears, we can't return it to the demon who incited him to the action; we have to deal with the man who confronts us in his physical body. However, what is so necessary on the surface of existence is not really adequate for understanding the world; it is particularly useless for grasping our social life. In other words, a person gets nowhere today if behind what goes on physically he does not fully recognize a spiritual world in its reality and concreteness. This is most important. But the majority of people are afraid of it.
Their fear is not unfounded. If you are not dull, prosaic people (of course no one here is!), a shiver will run down your spine when you think how you provide all kinds of spiritual beings with a stage for their activities. This is indeed the case. If we are conscious of the fact, we can feel that we lose ourselves in the spiritual beings who fill us out. We are like sacks stuffed to the top with all kinds of beings. Admittedly a shivery feeling is not unjustified. Nevertheless, it cannot be got rid of by denying the fact that one is such a sack—by closing one's consciousness, as it were, to become blind and deaf to what is a reality. Help must be obtained in some other way.
Now we are confronting a very significant fact. Let us assume that a man who is a human coherer into whom the wave of strife discharges but who is not inclined to acknowledge spiritual life in any way—let us assume that he gives himself up completely to the modern way of thinking, that is to say, to the thinking formed on the model of the scientific world conception. We must face these things really seriously. For at the present time unless we do so we cannot find a gleam of light, we can only succumb to Rathenau's pessimism. Take the following, for example. Suppose—shall we say—a man like Ludendorff had become a professor of botany. He would have been excellent as such; he would have done outstanding work. Indeed, he would have become quite a celebrity, as people say—so well-known that his ambition would have been satisfied. And… he would not have made so many human beings suffer as he has in fact done. Now Ludendorff has not had the position of a guiltless professor of botany (guiltless, that is, from a cosmic aspect, for probably he would in some way have tortured the students who were having to pass his examinations!) But let us assume he had become an innocent professor of botany, innocent from a cosmic point of view: then things would have gone quite well. But they did not go that way: he became a so-called strategist. And because of what lay within him, that is, a capacity only to think the thoughts of those ghostly webs woven by science, he could not draw up into his consciousness what discharged itself into his soul. For that way of thinking is not suited to bring up into consciousness what is discharged into the soul below. And so he became the cause of disaster for a great part of humanity. He is one of the thirty or forty individuals outwardly responsible for the present catastrophe. He is a man who from the place he occupies simply struggles against the recognition of any kind of spirituality. But the time has come when persons in influential positions who fight against acknowledging the spirit, who refuse to recognize that the spiritual world is indeed playing into human life, such persons can bring calamity upon mankind. It is most important that this fact be grasped. Now, today, even if they have not held responsible positions in the war itself, still there are countless individuals who, from fear or some other reason, are resisting the wave of spiritual life that is flowing in through the Spirits of Personality—resisting it because they only want to think as science thinks.
That is the reason why today many personalities are incomprehensible, and why many are wrongly estimated. It is infinitely tragic, for example, that such a man as Ludendorff is looked upon as great. But it is true that the fact to which I have just alluded blurs people's judgment of individuals. All kinds of demonic forces play into these men, and are even imputed to them while actually they are pushing them back, because they carry in their souls a mere ghostly web on the scientific pattern and with this they cannot grasp a situation. The kind of person I have mentioned then lives his life so that in everything he does he may be insensible to the breach in his personality and to all that surges and rages deep within him. This is the case with very many people today. They are numb to what is raging within them when they attain a certain position in outer life; one cudgels his neighbor, another writes an utterly foolish book on botany, and so on; they are befogged about what is actually surging within them and causing the potential disintegration of their personality. This threatens them simply through the impact of today's inevitable events, because they are afraid of being hurled into the struggle now being enacted in the world behind the scenes, on the waves of which the Spirits of Personality wish to enter into our age.
Recognition of the spiritual world requires our being alive to the question we are now examining. And, dear friends, it is tremendously important to take seriously what has so often been emphasized here, namely, that spiritual science should not be regarded as mere theory. If you are going to consider it mere theory, you would be better off reading a cookbook; for it is not just the content of spiritual science that is essential. The gist of the matter is how one has to think in order to do justice to spiritual science. It is a different kind of thinking from the thinking employed in the natural-scientific world of today. You see, there are definitely two ways to form thoughts. One is the dismembering, differentiating way that today plays so great a role in science, where differences are looked for, where careful distinctions are made. This is the prevailing scientific method. In science all that is said or written or done is under the influence of thinking that is dismembering, thinking that is differentiating. Exact definitions are demanded. Today when you so much as make a statement, you are nailed down to sharp definitions. But sharp, rigid definitions are simply distinguishing the things defined from the things not defined. This manner of thinking is a mask used with particular pleasure by the Spirits who are joined in this battle and who would like to tear us apart. Speaking trivially, one could say that a large number of the individuals responsible for the catastrophe of the war, or having to do with its aftermath, are really mad! But that, as I said, is speaking trivially. The important thing is to understand what has brought about the disintegration of their personalities. This first way of thinking is the thinking that is accessible to the various forces, various powers that are tearing man asunder. It must be clearly distinguished from the second way of thinking, which alone is employed in spiritual science.
The second way of thinking is a totally different kind of mental process, a completely other way of thinking. In contrast to the dismembering kind, it is a shape-forming manner of thinking. If you look more closely, if you follow what I have tried to indicate in my various books on spiritual science, you will realize that the difference does not lie so much in the content that is imparted—this can be judged from various other viewpoints; but the way of seeing the whole world and of coordinating that knowledge, the entire mode of thought representation, is a different one. This is shape-producing; it gives separate pictures, rounded totalities; it gives contours, and through contours, color. Throughout the entire presentation in the printed books you will be able to see that it has none of the dismembering character that you find in all modern science. This difference of the “how” (the mode of thinking) must be brought out just as emphatically as the difference of the “what” (the content of subject matter). Thus there exists a formative (gestaltende) way of thinking that has been developed with the especial purpose of leading to the supersensible worlds. If you take the book, Knowledge of the Higher Worlds, where such a path is marked out, you will find that every thought, every idea in it is based on this formative thinking.
This is something essential for the present time. For this formative thinking has a quite definite quality. When you dissect with your thinking, like a present-day scientist, you are thinking just the way certain spirits of the ahrimanic world think and you are making it possible for them to enter your soul. If on the other hand you exercise creative, formative thinking (gestaltendes Denken), thinking that allows for metamorphosis, I could also say Goethean thinking—represented, for instance, in the shaping of our pillars and capitals; used too in all the books I have tried to give to spiritual science—this thinking is closely bound up with the human being. Only the beings connected with the normal evolution of mankind can work creatively, sculpturally as a human being works within himself with thinking. This is the amazing thing about it. You can never go astray on a wrong path if through spiritual science you engage in formative thinking. You can never lose yourself in the various spiritual beings who want to gain an influence over you. It is natural for them to permeate your being. As soon, however, as you practice formative thinking, as soon as you refrain from mere musing or from dissecting, and strive to think in the way modern spiritual science thinks, you retain possession of yourself and cannot then have the feeling of complete emptiness. This is the reason why from the standpoint of spiritual science we are always placing such great emphasis on the Christ Impulse. For the Christ Impulse stands in the direct line of formative thinking. Even the Gospels cannot be understood if they are simply dismembered. The result of that treatment is shown in modern Protestant theology, which has been pulling them to pieces: the result is that everything has fallen away; absolutely nothing has remained. The lecture cycles on the Gospels22Rudolf Steiner, Gospel of St. John, Gospel of St. John and Its Relation to the Other Gospels (Spring Valley, Anthroposophic Press, 1984 and 1982). follow the opposite path. They build up and shape something so that through these new forms an understanding of the old Gospels is brought about. Actually, what people need today—and this is not exaggerating in the least—is to exercise the spiritual scientific mode of thinking: then those demonic beings who are the accompanying phenomena of the Spirits of Personality on the new incoming wave will not be able to do the people harm. You see how much mankind loses by fighting against the spiritual scientific way of thinking.
I have already told you that the wave cannot be thrust aside, even if people will not go to meet it. Mankind may oppose it, may not wish to perceive it, but still the wave flows in. Then there follows what has really led to the deeper aspect of our present catastrophe, namely, the non-recognition of the spiritual world. That is finally the deeper cause of the present catastrophic events, and especially of the present tragic attitude of soul. And since it is a battle being waged in lower regions, there is no other way of experiencing this soul struggle than by developing the creativity of the human personality itself—through formative thinking. Otherwise the battle will be carried into the external world. Therefore this has to be said: that it is truly not right for people to be unwilling to examine the spiritual grounds of the present disastrous world situation. For, you notice, something extraordinarily new lies in what has been told you. It is a disclosure of the new wave that is to break upon present-day mankind through a quite special way of forming thoughts. If people give themselves up to thoughts modelled on those of science, they will simply be unable to grow to the stature required by the times. If they merely want to organize what is here in the physical world, merely want to reflect upon what surrounds them in the physical world, and have no desire for anything else to be valid, then they only destroy. And then they should not be surprised if the struggle that they do not want to fight out in the spiritual world is carried into physical life. For it has already entered humanity. If human beings will not fight it out in their souls, then it will set man against man, nation against nation, all against all. What happens here in the physical world can only be an image of the spiritual world. Either men take up the battle and fight it out in their souls—which means, they deepen themselves spiritually—or, if they persist in thinking as this present world thinks, the battle will go through their consciousness as through a sieve, and will finally end by their souls being abandoned to the external world. And this will be the cause of everything that is now going to happen. If you reflect on these things, you will realize that present-day human beings are really obliged to turn to the spirit, that this is forced upon them by world events.
Let us now consider what is presented to us this New Year's Day when we are meant to look ahead at what is coming. This particular moment offers us, indeed, a shattering prospect. What we have to keep in mind, dear friends, is this, that we must not deceive ourselves by trying to sleep through this view into the future. That is why I read you yesterday the forecast that has been pronounced by a man who calculates, who does not throw words about from sympathy or antipathy but who reckons with them. I wanted you to see where a calculating materialist of this present time finds himself. People such as he are heading in quite a different direction from a serious perception that they have to acknowledge the spiritual world simply for their own good. Whoever penetrates into the spiritual world and sees its relation to the physical world knows that certain laws prevail even when they do not seem to apply logically—when the logical consequence lies, for instance, in thinking that is dismembering, not in thinking that is formative, intuitive (anschauendes), as I have been describing. You see, laws of this kind do not prevail even externally in a rigid, letter-of-the-law way; but they are definitely there. Take such a law as this, that about the same number of men are born into the world as women. Even this law has its exceptions, even though when considered theoretically it might appear detrimental to mankind if in some particular century only a twentieth of the population born were males and all the others females! Laws do indeed exist that are not founded on ordinary logic and that can only be explained by spiritual science.
Such a law is the following: In the measure to which human beings in a certain epoch permeate their souls with recognition of the spiritual world, as I described it today, so that the spiritual world can flow into their consciousness, in the same measure can the common life of mankind also unfold and human beings be given the possibility to reach beyond their anti-social impulses and beyond all that works against true community.
But people today do not have the courage to let the spiritual world really play into their consciousness. At least a few people should know that the important need of this moment is that the spiritual world should have immediate access to human consciousness. From this point of view consider certain phenomena of this time or, I might say, favorite attitudes of this time, and you will see how people today have the desire to exclude from their consciousness any connection with the spiritual laws of existence. I showed you recently how we have to reckon with this fact even in practical matters, where a conscious connection can easily be eliminated. I was speaking at the time of intelligence tests. With these there is no longer any desire to create a direct, simple connection with the pupils' gifts; instead, in order to avoid any need for thinking, there are all kinds of external measures to test the memory and the intellectual capacity. This is also the reason why people love mathematics. Certain rules are established and the rest is mathematical reckoning. There is no need to follow the details with one's intelligence—nor would it be possible to do so. You will agree that you can picture three or four or five beans in a row, even ten beans; to imagine twenty at one glance is already difficult; but think of having to picture a thousand at one glance, or an entire million! Yet you can reckon them perfectly well, because you can make the calculation mechanically, and have no need to follow with your intelligence the details of what you are doing. What modern people particularly love is to prove something without actually having to call upon their intelligence. They find it terribly irksome if asked to follow the single stages of the proof. They prefer that the matter prove itself without human intervention. What they would like most of all is that the spiritual world would prove its own existence outside there somewhere, through spiritualism or the like. It appalls people that spiritual science should call upon them to be active at each successive stage. That is why they love the symbols of old occultism and things of that kind—and rituals, of which they can say: they are performed before us and we don't have to use our intelligence to follow them; we don't have to form the slightest conception of what is taking place. But that is just what modern spiritual science has to insist upon: the following up of detail. Without it, spiritual science is unthinkable.
It is worthy of notice that in eastern Europe we find the seeds of what really belongs to the next epoch. All kinds of things are being done in that eastern region that show how the human being wants to penetrate with his intelligence what is only meant to be encircled by a net of common intelligence. In this present age of the consciousness soul, some people are trying to bring sharp intellectual shrewdness down into the realm where intelligence alone should be active, where everything should simply be drawn into a net of common intelligence. Take, for example, the way propaganda has been carried on in Russia during the last two decades to bring about the gradual fall of czardom. Naturally this could not happen quite openly in the Russia of serfdom and the whip. Anything written and circulated normally would have been confiscated by the police. Nor was it possible to make speeches. And yet in a comparatively short time, from 1900 to 1904, 60,000,000 anti-czarist pamphlets appeared in Russia. Of these 60,000,000 the police tracked down only twenty to twenty-five percent; the others were distributed, and an immense number appeared just before the downfall of the Czar. Thus a large proportion of the population were prepared for the end of czardom. Now how did it ever come about that, in spite of all that was scented out and confiscated by the police, still out of sixty million pamphlets, each one of which called for revolution and the end of czardom, hardly a quarter were seized? The explanation is that those who led the agitation had discovered a very definite fact, which today is of great importance but which people simply fail to investigate. When they do investigate it in an ahrimanic way, as those Revolutionary leaders did, they have something that enables them to work with tremendous power. Those leaders discovered that the same words addressed to a strictly czarist member of the police worked in an entirely different way when addressed to an ordinary man in the street. The same words that, spoken in the proper manner, sound to a policeman as gentle as a lamb can under certain conditions work upon the populace in a most extreme socialistic sense. Certainly pamphlets were not written then as they are written now in Switzerland—and immediately confiscated; but books or pamphlets were distributed about botany, about plants, that simply by the way they were written prepared souls fully, so that in 1917 Russia was completely ready for the Revolution. It is enormously important to be aware of this secret: that what one says affects one person quite differently from the way it affects another person. In any case, this has all been carefully studied, and the studies made in this sphere are thoroughly characteristic of our time. In fact, they are part of what is struggling most bitterly against the spiritual science that is entering the world.
For instance, I cannot think of anything more strongly opposed to the real essence of the spirit than such books as those by Nikolai Rubakin. Rubakin attempts to study the human soul—and in a new way, but in such a way that it completely denies everything that is alive in spiritual science: that is, in such a way that in a certain sense the intelligence is maintained as it works, but also the activity of the individual intelligence can be excluded in the working. Such a man as Rubakin is reckoning that everything that happens at the present time is bound up with intelligence, but that we should not always work through the subjective intelligence. In this sense he has made the following wide investigation: he has organized a study of people who read books. He asks them to name their favorite books and to say what particularly impressed them in those books, and what kind of influence the books have had upon them. He puts these questions to them in such a way that no account is taken of their sympathies and antipathies—these are expressly ignored, so that only the objective working of their intelligence comes into consideration. The readers give themselves up to a self-analysis of such a kind that simply through the questions he asks they say things that allow him to see more deeply into their souls than they do themselves. This is one method.
The other method is this: again a questionnaire is sent to thousands and thousands of people, asking them to analyze current books. No notice is taken whether a book is on mathematics or botany or politics or socialism or anarchy; that is of minor importance, for that is merely the reading matter, and most readers are unaware that that constitutes only one part of a book. Rubakin establishes how the book works by the beauty of its phrasing, by its disclosure of the writer's temperament, or the monotony of his style. These are genuine qualities through which he can discover the prevailing objective intelligence. He establishes it statistically through these books. The whole method goes to show the outstreaming and intaking of intelligence that is active at the present time. Were such a science carried a bit further, someone could write a fearfully revolutionary book on Jupiter, and someone else a book on the right foreleg of the cockchafer, and the second book would serve the purpose of this Rubakin inquiry just as well as the first. For here it is not a question of what is said but of how it is said; from this it is learnt what works in people as objective intelligence, of which people themselves are not conscious. Here a person is not active subjectively, because he is not allowing his individual intelligence to play a part—any more than he allows it to do in arithmetic. The person is participating in a general prevailing intelligence and is not involved in what this normally brings into action in individual human beings, for his subjective intelligence has been completely excluded.
On the basis of such a science one could found a college today that would undertake to spread revolutionary propaganda simply by following the lines I have indicated. There are such endeavors at the present time. The intention of all of them is, in this epoch of intelligence not to include man in the intelligence but to throw him out of it. This comes from the same source as the desire that man shall not receive the spiritual world consciously, that is, with the consciousness belonging to this present day. But, of course, that is essential. The only salvation for mankind today and in the immediate future is that we accept boldly and courageously the coming-in of the spiritual world. We will not have to give intelligence tests or collect statistics on books and their readers to discover what wants to reveal itself that is living in humanity right now. Another way will be taken, dear friends. For what is the purpose of all this? To speak quite simply, all those endeavors of Rubakin and the rest aim at pulling man out of his skin, because in his skin he has to make use of his intelligence and, what is more, to turn it toward a spiritual life. People would like to get outside their skin. They no longer want to live in it, because they know something living is streaming into it and they find it unpleasant to make the acquaintance of this living thing; they would prefer to escape it. They would like to objectify their intelligent nature, to get outside of it and sit down beside it, so that the wave would only go through it and not through them. But that is also what spiritual science wants!—a science that is not just shut up inside the skin. We should indeed get out of our skin, but not in the wrong way as the experiments I have described accomplish it. People have that wrong urge already. In reality they should accept a knowledge that simply has to be confirmed by their sound human understanding. They do not need to be free of their body to acquire a knowledge that is itself independent of what they do in their body. This is the task of truth—the other is a caricature of truth. And such caricatures of the true spiritual task of the present age are responsible for the evils of this age that have brought us to our present impasse.
When we see in this way what is dominating our epoch, we know why it is that people who do not want to acknowledge the real spirit, but who are honest and do not delude themselves, are at the same time clear about what confronts mankind if it still clings to materialism. We must realize that in this signpost pointing to the spirit lies what need not necessarily make us pessimistic. When we find how little people are inclined even today to approach the spiritual world in the way spiritual science indicates, then we see where the deeper causes of the present ruin actually lie.
Even this year all kinds of articles about Christmas have appeared in print again. One can hardly believe that such rubbish would reappear in these grave times. Everyone writes surprisingly well, in fact, quite beautifully of how people should love one another. Actually they hate one another as never before, but there it is in writing that we should love one another, we should love our enemies, and so on. There was even a letter printed entitled “A woman's letter to Walther Rathenau.” People write in such a manner that, looked at spiritually, the idea lying behind the writing appears in a very strange light. They write of human love, of Christianity, of every possible thing; it is all very beautiful, and the people reading it think it is exquisite. Yet it is nothing but obsolete concept-coins rumbling around in their heads or hearts. And while all this rumbles and rolls, the writer or the reader stands behind and feels a sensuous love for these words, so that all this has the effect upon him of rich sweetmeats. One can dream so deliciously when one says: Christ preached love for one's neighbor; Christianity must blossom again; and so on. With that kind of attitude, the people feel not the slightest necessity to accept the concrete spiritual world in the innermost depths of their soul, with their whole being—as spiritual science requires. The pressing need is for us to take these things in earnest. If we recognize them theoretically and then still do nothing more than stand in reverence before Wilsonism or fall into national chauvinism, still holding forth in the old way—then we shall never get beyond this catastrophe. It will continue until human beings make up their minds really to accept the spiritual world as it must be accepted today, that is, with consciousness that is concrete and without fear or timidity.
And so when we gaze into the new cosmic year, we see on the one hand how some people, just to allay their fears, offer political forecasts and found Leagues of Nations that are to abolish war from the world. In spite of rejoicing that there will not be another Vienna Congress, people are already beginning to say that they would be content if the Congress of Versailles only procured for us as many months of peace as the Vienna Congress brought years of peace. For, in truth, men love to hold thoughts that act like narcotics. The strongest benumbing thought for people today, after they have rejected certain others, is that Wilson is the right man for the future. He is the great man, is he not?—a man who thinks fourteen abstract thoughts are able to transform life in our present world into a paradise! It is comforting, is it not?—something that can lull us to sleep. It is far less comfortable to say: If we are to be saved from a future such as Rathenau predicts, it is necessary that as many individuals as possible come to a conscious recognition of the spiritual world.
This is what one would like to bring to pass in at least a few souls after the New Year's Eve retrospect that we shared last night. One hopes that the truth of that experience has stirred our souls so strongly that someone can say: if mankind continues with the thinking that has become customary, not only in one people but among all the peoples around the earth, then Rathenau's forecast must be correct. Dear friends, there is no necessity for it to be correct! Mankind has the chance to prove that there is no need for his forecast to be correct. This can be our New Year resolution, that we will exert our will so that the foreboding is proved to be false. For this, however, we will have to discard all the old prejudices in which even today we still indulge with such extreme pleasure—prejudices that are completely out of date. It is far more important to take up what is new.
Anyone with insight will know where the spirit is being sought, and there he will find assurance of future security. Where there is no search for the spirit there will be no hope for the future—for conquered or conqueror. Let one part of the world population demand milliards from another part, and the milliards will become melted gold that burns and destroys—while poverty, if given wings by the spirit, can carry men to heights that lead to the future evolution of humanity.
But this must be experienced by insight into the path of the spirit. No leaning toward anything external, no worshiping of new idols that are even now being made ready, can save mankind: only keeping to the spirit, holding fast to the spirit, working in the spirit.
Achter Vortrag
Ein Lichtstrahl, der wirklich erleuchtend wirken kann, fällt auf solche Zeitrückblicke, wie wir gestern einen angestellt haben, wenn man zunächst gewissermaßen die negative Seite der Sache ins Auge faßt, wenn man sich nämlich fragt, wie wir das im Grunde schon öfter getan haben: Welches sind im tieferen Sinne die Impulse, welche die Menschheit in der Gegenwart in solche katastrophalen Ereignisse, namentlich aber, was noch wichtiger ist, in eine gewisse katastrophale Verfassung hineingebracht haben, wie sie ganz deutlich in den Verhältnissen zutage tritt? - Nun wird man selbstverständlich nicht gleich immer den Blick wenden können auf die tieferen Grundlagen von Zeitereignissen. Man wird den Blick zunächst wenden auf die, ich möchte sagen, mehr oberflächliche Schichte des Geschehens. Man wird dann dies oder jenes schildern können, und man wird mit solchen Schilderungen keineswegs unrecht haben. Das ist etwas, was immer berücksichtigt werden muß, wenn im Ernste von geisteswissenschaftlichen Betrachtungen ausgegangen werden soll. Solche geisteswissenschaftlichen Betrachtungen wollen nicht sagen, daß anderes immer unrichtig sei. Aber sie wollen heute in der Gegenwart namentlich darauf hinweisen, daß es nicht genügt, bei einer gewissen oberflächlichen Schichte der Weltbetrachtung stehenzubleiben, sondern daß es notwendig ist, tiefer in die Verhältnisse einzudringen. Nichts gerade Neues soll nach dieser Richtung hin heute gesagt werden, aber an manches soll erinnert werden, was, wenn man es sich als eine gewisse Neujahrsperspektive vor die Seele stellt, geeignet ist, in richtiger Art in diese Perspektive hineinzugehen, die vor uns in vieler Beziehung in erschütternder Weise liegt.
Sie erinnern sich, wie ich in diesen Tagen ausgeführt habe, daß zum Allerwichtigsten, zum Allerwesentlichsten in der Erkenntnis der gegenwärtigen Zeit gehört, daß die Menschheit gewissermaßen vor einer neuen Offenbarung steht. Es ist diejenige Offenbarung, die geschehen soll, und in gewisser Beziehung auch schon geschieht, durch die Geister der Persönlichkeit, welche, wenn man sich so ausdrücken will, zu der Würde von Schöpfern aufsteigen, während wir als Schöpfer im Weltengange der Menschheit bisher nur haben ansprechen können diejenigen Geister, welche in der Bibel die Elohim genannt werden, die wir die Geister der Form nennen. Etwas Schöpferisches also wird auftauchen innerhalb desjenigen, was der Mensch beim Verfolgen der Außenwelt bemerken kann.
Nun liegt es in gewissen Bedingungen der Menschennatur, daß der Mensch sich zunächst sträubt gegen die Anerkennung eines solchen hereinbrechenden Geisteselementes. Der Mensch will namentlich in der Gegenwart nicht eingehen auf ein solches Hereinbrechen eines geistigen Elementes. Nun müssen wir zweierlei unterscheiden, gerade wenn wir diese gegenwärtige neue Offenbarung ins Auge fassen. Um mich deutlicher zu machen, möchte ich noch das Folgende sagen.
Der berühmte Kardinal Newman sagte, als er eingekleidet wurde in Rom, ein merkwürdiges Wort. Er sagte bei seiner Einkleidung, daß er kein anderes Heil für die Kirche sähe als eine neue Offenbarung. Das ist nun schon Jahrzehnte her, und Verschiedenes ist in der Welt da oder dort über diese merkwürdige Anschauung des Kardinals Newman gesprochen worden. Wenn man aber hinblickt auf das, was von kirchlicher Seite und von solcher Seite, die dem kirchlichen Bekenntnis verwandt ist, darüber gesagt worden ist, so ist es überall ein Hinweis darauf gewesen, daß man nicht von einer neuen Offenbarung sprechen soll, daß vielmehr an der alten Offenbarung festzuhalten sei. Und vor allen Dingen, wenn irgend etwas notwendig sei, so sei es nur das, daß man die alte Offenbarung besser verstünde, als man sie bisher verstanden hat.
In diesen Einwänden, die von allen möglichen Seiten gegen den Ausspruch des Kardinals gemacht worden sind, der also eine Intuition hatte von dem Hereinbrechen einer neuen Offenbarung, sieht man, wie sich die Menschheit sträubt gegen eine solche Offenbarung. Nun ist zweierlei, wie gesagt, zu unterscheiden. Dadurch, daß sich die Menschen sträuben, eine solche Offenbarung entgegenzunehmen, wird selbstverständlich die Tatsache nicht aus der Welt geschafft, daß diese Offenbarung kommt. Diese Offenbarung ergießt sich wie eine neue Geisteswelle durch das Geschehen, in das der Mensch eingespannt ist. Der Mensch kann diese Welle nicht etwa von der Erde zurückstoßen. Sie ergießt sich über die Erde. Das ist die eine Tatsache.
Also, ich möchte sagen, seit einiger Zeit, insbesondere seit dem Beginne des 20. Jahrhunderts - oder eigentlich deutlicher gesagt seit dem Jahre 1899 etwa - stehen wir, indem wir als Menschen in der Welt herumgehen, innerhalb einer neuen Welle des geistigen Lebens, die sich in das andere Leben der Menschheit hineinergießt. Und ein Geistesforscher ist heute nur ein Mensch, der dies zugibt, das heißt, der bemerkt, daß so etwas hereingebrochen ist in das Leben der Menschheit. Das ist die eine Tatsache.
Die andere Tatsache ist eben, daß die Menschen - gerade nach ihrer gegenwärtigen Verfassung - ein gewisses Aufraffen brauchen, eine gewisse Aktivität brauchen, um zu bemerken, daß eine solche Welle sich in das Leben hereinergießt. Dadurch konnte das Bedeutsame eintreten, daß auf der einen Seite diese Welle sich wirklich hereinergossen hat in das Leben und da ist, auf der andern Seite aber die Menschen sie nicht bemerken wollen. Sie sträuben sich dagegen. Diese Tatsache, die dürfen Sie nicht abstrakt betrachten. Denn die Zentren gewissermaßen, die Mittelpunkte, in welchen sich diese Welle so ähnlich entlädt wie die elektrische Stromwelle im Kohärer bei der drahtlosen Telegraphie, die Kohärer auf diesem Gebiete also sind doch die Menschenseelen. Und geben Sie sich darüber keiner Täuschung hin: die Sache ist so, daß, indem die Menschen auf der Erde leben, sie einfach dadurch, daß sie Menschen des 20. Jahrhunderts sind, Aufnahmeapparate für das sind, was sich in der geschilderten Weise in das Leben hereinergießt. Der Mensch kann sich sträuben, mit seinem Bewußtsein das zuzugeben, aber er kann es nicht verhindern, daß seine Seele doch den Wellenschlag aufnimmt, daß der Wellenschlag in ihm ist.
Nun muß man gerade diese Tatsache etwas genauer betrachten. Man muß nach den verschiedenen Voraussetzungen fragen, die wir jetzt machen können, nachdem wir diese Betrachtungen durch Wochen hindurch angestellt haben. Man muß fragen: Welches ist denn in unserem Zeitalter die bedeutungsvollste Fähigkeit der menschlichen Seele? Das ist die Intellektualität. Und wenn immer wieder und mit vollem Recht betont wird, der Mensch soll auch die andern Seelenkräfte zur Ausbildung bringen, nicht bloß die Intellektualität, so geschieht solche Betonung gerade aus dem Grunde heute so intensiv, weil der Mensch fühlt, die Intellektualität ist die eigentliche Fähigkeit des Zeitalters, und et soll, weil die Intellektualität über ihn hereinbrechen will, nur nicht die andern Fähigkeiten verkümmern lassen. Gerade weil die Intellektualität im Zeitalter der Bewußtseinsseele eine so wichtige Rolle spielt, gerade deshalb gibt es heute so oftmals die intensive Betonung, man soll das Gefühl, die Empfindung nicht verkümmern lassen, was eben gegenüber der hervorstechenden Tatsache, daß die Intellektualität eine so große Rolle spielt, von ganz besonderer Wichtigkeit ist.
Nun muß man sich über diese Intellektualität einmal eine klare Vorstellung machen. Ich habe von den verschiedensten Gesichtspunkten aus über diese Intellektualität gesprochen. Sie erinnern sich vielleicht, daß ich sogar in Öffentlichen Vorträgen nicht versäumt habe, das Notwendige über das Intellektuelle in der gegenwärtigen Zeit mitzuteilen. Ich habe zum Beispiel davon gesprochen, daß wir in unserer naturwissenschaftlichen Weltauffassung, die eigentlich doch alle Kreise ergriffen hat — jeder Mensch denkt heute naturwissenschaftlich, wenn er auch gar nichts von Naturwissenschaft weiß -, etwas haben, was sich insbesondere der Intellektualität bedient. Auch wenn man experimentiert, auch wenn man beobachtet, man verarbeitet die Experimente oder die Ergebnisse der Experimente, man verarbeitet die Beobachtungen mit der Intellektualität. Gerade in der naturwissenschaftlichen Weltanschauung, an die sich die Menschheit in der Gegenwart so gewöhnt hat, von deren Gesichtspunkten sie auch das soziale Leben zum Beispiel betrachten möchte, gerade in der naturwissenschaftlichen Weltanschauung waltet und webt ganz und gar diese Intellektualität. Aber wie webt sie? Ich habe in öffentlichen Vorträgen oftmals die Frage erörtert: Was für ein Bild der Welt gewinnt man eigentlich durch naturwissenschaftliche Weltanschauung ?Zuletzt sieht man doch ein, daß das, was man sich vorstellen kann von der Welt durch die gebräuchlichen naturwissenschaftlichen Denkgewohnheiten, nicht die Wirklichkeit ist, sondern ein Gespenst oder eine Summe von Gespenstern, selbst unsere Atome und alles das, was man sich vorstellt in der Welt der Atome. Aber auch solche Leute, die mehr Positivisten sind, die nicht viel auf die Atomhypothese geben, wie Poincaré oder Avenarius oder Mach, stellen sich die Natur so vor, daß sie in ihren Vorstellungen eigentlich nicht etwas Wirkliches haben, wo die Natur hineinspielt, sondern ein Gespenst der Natur. Es ist dies zusammenhängend mit dem, was ich vor einigen Tagen hier gesagt habe: daß eigentlich die Begriffswelt, in der wir heute im Zeitalter der Bewußtseinsseele leben, nicht Wirklichkeiten enthält, sondern nur Bilder, Spiegelbilder. Und es ist schon außerordentlich viel gewonnen, wenn man nicht an dem Aberglauben hängt, daß, wenn man ein naturwissenschaftliches Buch liest oder eine naturwissenschaftliche Auseinandersetzung hört, man dann von einer Wirklichkeit erzählen hört. Wird man sich dessen bewußt, was einem da mitgeteilt ist, so ist das eigentlich nur ein Bild, eine Art Gespenst der Wirklichkeit. Was aber da lebt in solchen Vorstellungen, die eigentlich nur gespenstische Bilder sind, die sich nicht so wie die Goetheschen Metamorphosengedanken mit der Wirklichkeit verbinden, das, was da lebt, hat man doch heute in einem gewissen Sinn außerordentlich gern, außerordentlich lieb. Und man möchte die Wirklichkeit einfangen in dieses Gespenstgespinst der Vorstellungen. Alle diejenigen Leute, die heute von monistischer Weltanschauung und dergleichen reden, oder die sonstwie die positivistische Weltanschauung begründen, die glauben eigentlich mit einem merkwürdigen Aberglauben an die Tragweite dieser Gespenstgespinste. Sie glauben, sie könnten aus dem, was ihnen die heutige naturwissenschaftliche Anschauung gibt, ein Bild der Wirklichkeit herausholen, was sie eben nicht können. Also man liebt diese gespenstartige Natur des Weltbildes, das man sich schon einmal nach der heutigen Entwickelungsstufe des Menschen machen kann. Und das, daß man auf der einen Seite seine Vorstellungswelt liebt, daß aber diese Vorstellungswelt auf der andern Seite doch nur Bilder gibt, das beherrscht heute die Seelen. Und die Seelen, die in dieser Weise beherrscht sind von ihrem Vorstellungsstreben, die sind es, die sich sträuben gegen das Hereinbrechen einer Geisteswelle, die ja Wirklichkeit ist, und die zunächst nicht aufgefangen werden kann durch das bloße Gespenstgespinst der Vorstellungen, die man an der Hand der Naturwissenschaft entwickelt. Man kommt mit diesen Dingen nur zurecht, wenn man sich ganz klar ist, daß diese naturwissenschaftliche Vorstellungsart die Menschen dazu präpariert, das positive Geistige abzuweisen, das hereinspielt in die Welt. Und deshalb sträuben sie sich, furchtsam sträuben sie sich gegen die Welle, von der ich gesagt habe, daß sie hereinkommt und sich ausbreitet und daß sie doch in den Seelen der Menschen lebt.
So ist im heutigen Menschen, gerade in den Menschen, die tonangebend sind, etwas da, was diese Welle nicht ergreifen mag; da ist etwas von dem Einschlagen dieser Welle, aber es ist zu gleicher Zeit in ihrem Bewußtsein etwas, was diese Welle nicht ergreifen mag. Man kann das Schema des heutigen Menschen oftmals so hinstellen, daß man sagt: Wenn dieses der Mensch ist, so ist hier eine Schicht der Seele, und hier eine zweite Schicht der Seele. Hier oben in dieser Schicht (siehe Zeichnung, II) ist das Bewußtsein, das heutige Bewußtsein, das insbesondere naturwissenschaftlich geschult ist. Aber die Welle, von der ich spreche, die geht durch die andere Schicht durch (rot). Nun würde es sich darum handeln, daß das Bewußtsein sich nicht bloß mit dem beschäftigt, was Gespenstgespinst wird, sondern daß das Bewußtsein in sich hereinfließen läßt, was da unten ist, daß es in sich aufnimmt, was da unten ist.

Wenn Sie dies bedenken, so werden Sie etwas finden, was gerade heute für das Verstehen der Seelenkonstitution von außerordentlicher Wichtigkeit ist. Denn wir hätten diese furchtbare Kriegskatastrophe oder vielmehr den kriegerischen Ausdruck dieser Katastrophe — die Katastrophe, die in der Menschheit waltet, ist ja verschieden gestaltet, sie hat verschiedene Seiten, der Krieg, von dem man gesprochen hat, ist nur eine Seite -, diese Kriegsseite der Katastrophe, das, was da hauptsächlich in den letzten viereinhalb Jahren gewütet hat, das hätten wir gar nicht bekommen können, wenn nicht diese seelische Tatsache vorläge. Man muß diese seelische Tatsache ganz genau ins Auge fassen, wenn man sie verstehen will. Man muß sich nämlich fragen: Wie ist es denn eigentlich mit dieser Welle, die da so geht?
Das ist eine Welle, die zunächst gleichsam unter der Oberfläche dessen ist, worauf man gewöhnlich aufmerksam ist. Man kann fragen: Was lebt denn eigentlich in dieser Welle, in der sich gerade die Geister der Persönlichkeit bewegen? - Gewiß, es leben darin die Geister der Persönlichkeit, die sich neu als Schöpfer offenbaren wollen, aber es lebt eben manches andere noch in dieser Welle. Denn sehen Sie, Sie können sich einfach ein Meer vorstellen, da fahren Schiffe, in diesen Schiffen können die verschiedensten Persönlichkeiten sein, die sich auf den Wellen da bewegen; sie seien uns Bilder der Geister der Persönlichkeiten. Aber die Wellen selber sind ja da, die stellen auch etwas dar. Im Meer haben wir gewissermaßen bloß das blinde Wasserelement, das aber schon auch seine Mucken haben kann. Aber in dieser geistigen Welle, von der ich da spreche, stellt sich etwas anderes dar. Das, was da hereinflutet in die Seelen, was wirklich in den Seelen einschlägt, das ist Kampf, das ist ein Weltenkampf, der sich gewissermaßen hinter der Szene der gegenwärtigen Welt abspielt. In diesen Weltenkampf ist der Mensch eingesponnen. Die Wahrnehmung der Geister der Persönlichkeit, von denen ich spreche, ist für den Geistesforscher keineswegs eine, ich möchte sagen, ganz bequeme, wohlige Sache. Sie ist durchaus nicht so zu schildern, daß man etwa dem Menschen sagen könnte: Ich mache dich zum Geistesanschauer, weil dir das eine ungeheure Seligkeit bietet, weil du da recht wohlig schwimmen kannst in der geistigen Anschauung. - Das möchten die meisten Menschen. Die möchten, daß man ihnen so etwas wie einen Labetrank gibt, wenn sie heute in die geistige Welt hineinkommen sollen. Sie scheuen davor zurück, nicht einen Labetrank zu empfangen, nicht etwas, wovon sie sagen können: Es ist mir dabei so behaglich, so bequem zumute. — Das ist es gerade nicht, um was es sich heute handeln kann, sondern es handelt sich heute darum, daß man tatsächlich durch sich hindurchgehen fühlt einen Kampf, der sich hinter den Kulissen der Welt abspielt, einen Kampf, der sich abspielen muß, weil er notwendig hineingestellt ist in die Weltentwickelung, wie sie eben zu sein hat.
Man kann verschiedenes angeben, was diese Weltentwickelung, wie sie zu sein hat, charakterisiert. Ich will nur eines erwähnen. In den älteren, vorchristlichen Zeiten — gegen die Zeit, wo das Mysterium von Golgatha stattfand, hat das dann abgenommen -, da war es für die Seelen, die aufmerksam waren, über die ganze heidnische Welt hin wenigstens ziemlich selbstverständlich, daß sie Eindrücke hatten davon, daß es wiederholte Erdenleben gibt. Dieses alte Leben war überhaupt anders, als man geneigt ist, es sich heute vorzustellen. Nicht wahr, heute unterscheidet man Menschen, die eine Schulbildung haben und Menschen, die keine haben. In älteren Zeiten hat man unterschieden Menschen, die aufmerksam sein konnten auf die wiederholten Erdenleben, und solche, die nicht aufmerksam waren darauf. Das aber ging zurück, und ich habe öfter davon gesprochen, daß es gerade die Aufgabe des Christentums war, für eine Weile zurücktreten zu lassen diese Entwickelungswelle, die in dem Menschen das Bewußtsein von den wiederholten Erdenleben erweckt. Wenn man so etwas sagt, so setzt man sich gewöhnlich allerlei Mißverständnissen aus. Widersprüche werden einem vorgeworfen, die man ja, wenn man ausführlich redet, selber beheben möchte und kann. Ich habe neulich das wieder irgendwo gesagt; da hat mir gleich jemand geschrieben, ob ich denn nicht wisse, daß in der Bibel selber über die Reinkarnation gesprochen ist. Natürlich findet man in meinen Schriften die Andeutungen, wo in der Bibel darüber gesprochen ist, das ist selbstverständlich. Aber es ist nicht die Frage die, ob durch eine sehr weitgehende Interpretation in der Bibel von der Reinkarnation die Rede sein kann. Die ganze Verfassung in der Bibel ist doch so, daß die Reinkarnation in der Bibel nicht etwas darin Ausgesprochenes ist, nicht etwas, man kann sagen, an der Hand Hergetragenes. Das ist schon so, daß es in der Entwickelungsnotwendigkeit der Menschheit lag, daß eine Weile das Bewußtsein von den wiederholten Erdenleben zurückging, damit der Mensch sich daran gewöhne, ernst und intensiv das eine Erdenleben zu nehmen. Aber jetzt sind wir gewissermaßen bei einer Rückkehr dieser Sache; jetzt sind wir daran, daß wir nicht vorwärtskommen, wenn wir nicht den Blick wenden auf die wiederholten Erdenleben. Jetzt müssen wiederum diejenigen geistigen Elemente, die dem Menschen das Bewußtsein von den wiederholten Erdenleben zutragen wollen, hinter den Kulissen des Daseins einen harten Kampf kämpfen gegen diejenigen, die die alten Elemente und Impulse nur allein in das Bewußtsein des Menschen hineinlassen wollen. Dies ist ein bedeutsamer Kampf, an dem man teilnehmen muß, wenn man hineinschauen will in das, was hinter den Kulissen der Menschheitsentwickelung, der Weltentwickelung überhaupt vorgeht!
Man soll sich nur nicht vorstellen, daß hinter den Kulissen des sinnlichen Daseins etwas ist, worinnen man sich so gemütlich schlafen legen kann. So sind in der Regel die Paradiesesvorstellungen der materialistischen Menschen. Die stellen sich am liebsten vor: Wenn sich das Tor des 'Todes schließt, so kommen sie dann in die Möglichkeit, recht viel zu schlafen. Weil dieses Schlafen auch sehr behaglich ist, stellen es sich die Menschen am liebsten so vor. Nun, Sie wissen, daß die Sache nicht so ist. Aber es ist auch hinter den Kulissen des Daseins nicht so, daß man unbedingt nur das Begehren danach haben könnte, um alle diejenigen Triebe zu befriedigen, die man gerade aus seinem persönlichen Egoismus heraus gern hätte. Also man wird Teilnehmer eines Kampfes, eines richtigen Kampfes.
Nun liegt folgendes vor: Würden sich die Menschen nicht sträuben, diesen Kampf anzuschauen, würden sie sich bereit erklären, hinter die Kulissen des Daseins zu schauen nach den Mitteilungen, die von Geistesforschern gegeben werden, dann würden die Menschen das Dasein heute überhaupt anders anschauen. Was ich immer betont habe, das ist: Wir sollen Interesse gewinnen, der eine Mensch an dem andern; aber dieses Interesse, wie wir es gewinnen sollen, es ist in Wirklichkeit gar nicht denkbar, ohne daß wir die Geisteswissenschaft in unser Leben hereinleuchten lassen. Nicht wahr, wenn man zu Menschen in Beziehungen tritt - und jeder Mensch tritt zu Menschen in Beziehungen -, dann ist die Sache doch so: Wir lernen Menschen kennen, die wir gut nennen, wir lernen Menschen kennen, die wir mehr gleichgültig finden, wir lernen Menschen kennen, die wir böse nennen, die uns allerlei antun, durch die wir allerlei Schlimmes erfahren. Gewiß, im äußeren Leben auf dem physischen Plan bleibt nichts anderes übrig, als sich an die Menschen zu halten. Wenn einem schließlich einer eine Ohrfeige gibt, so kann man nicht, wenn man den Drang hat, sie ihm wieder zurückzugeben, sich an etwas anderes halten als an diesen Menschen. Aber den Zeitverhältnissen genügt diese Auffassung nicht mehr. Das muß man sich schon einmal gestehen: den Zeitverhältnissen genügt wirklich diese Auffassung nicht mehr, sondern es entspricht den Zeitverhältnissen viel mehr, wenn man sich heute sagt: Irgendein Mensch lügt einen an, oder ein anderer Mensch tut dies oder jenes. Gewiß, im physischen Leben muß man sich an den Menschen halten. Aber das Wichtige ist, daß man sich dessen bewußt wird: In den Menschen wirken herein allerlei geistige Impulse, und mit denen hat man es eigentlich zu tun. Man kann natürlich nicht, wenn einem einer eine Ohrfeige gibt, irgendeinem Dämon, der ihn dazu angetrieben hat, die Ohrfeige zurückgeben, man muß sich an den Menschen halten, der einem im physischen Leben physisch gegenübersteht. Aber das, was so notwendig ist, ich möchte sagen, vor den Kulissen des Daseins, das reicht wirklich nicht aus, um die Welt zu verstehen, namentlich reicht es nicht aus, um wirklich das soziale Leben ordentlich ins Auge zu fassen. Mit andern Worten: Der Mensch kommt heute nicht aus, wenn er nicht hinter dem, was physisch vorgeht, eine geistige Welt in Realität, in Konkretheit wirklich anerkennt. Das ist sehr wichtig. Davor haben die Menschen zum großen Teile Furcht.
Diese Furcht ist gewiß nicht unbegründet. Wenn Sie nicht ganz nüchterne, trockene Menschen sind - selbstverständlich sitzt kein solcher hier -, dann werden Sie so etwas wie eine kleine Gänsehaut bekommen, wenn Sie sich denken sollen, daß Sie eigentlich der Schauplatz sind für das Wirken allerlei geistiger Wesenheiten, wie es in Wahrheit der Fall ist. Hat man dann so das Bewußtsein, man ist der Schauplatz für das Wirken aller möglichen geistigen Wesenheiten, dann hat man das Gefühl, daß man sich verliert an diese geistigen Wesenheiten, die einen ausstopfen. Man kommt sich so wie ein Sack vor, der ausgestopft ist mit allen möglichen Wesenheiten. Dieses Gefühl ist gewiß nicht unberechtigt, diese Gänsehaut; aber sie kann wahrhaftig nicht dadurch aus der Welt geschafft werden, daß man die Tatsache, ein solcher Sack zu sein, ableugnet, daß man gewissermaßen das Bewußtsein davor verschließt und sich blind und taub macht gegen das, was eine Wirklichkeit ist. Es muß in anderer Weise Hilfe geschaffen werden.
Nun, da liegt eine sehr wichtige Tatsache vor. Nehmen Sie an, so ein Menschenkohäter, so ein Mensch, in den hereinschlägt die Welle des Kampfes, der aber nicht geneigt ist, auf das geistige Leben etwas zu geben, gibt sich der Denkweise der heutigen Zeit im eminentesten Sinne hin, der Denkweise, die nach dem Muster naturwissenschaftlicher Weltanschauung aufgebaut ist. Man muß wirklich sich ernsthaft den Dingen gegenüberstellen, denn in unserer heutigen Zeit kann man keinen Lichtstrahl empfangen, sondern nur sich Rathenauschem Pessimismus hingeben, wenn man nicht auf diese Dinge hinschaut. Nehmen Sie zum Beispiel folgendes. Nehmen Sie an, so ein Mann wie Ludendorff wäre Professor der Botanik geworden. Er wäre wahrscheinlich ein ausgezeichneter Professor der Botanik geworden, würde Außerordentliches geleistet haben als Professor der Botanik, würde, wie man sagt, ein berühmter Knopf geworden sein, so berühmt, daß es sogar seinen Ehrgeiz hätte befriedigen können, aber er würde nicht eine so große Zahl von Menschen unglücklich gemacht haben, wie er es getan hat. Nun stand er nicht an einem Platze, wo er ein unschuldiger Professor der Botanik war — unschuldig jetzt im Weltenzusammenhange; wahrscheinlich würde er diejenigen doch einigermaßen gemartert haben, die bei ihm hätten Examen machen sollen -, aber nehmen wir an, er wäre also im Weltenzusammenhange ein unschuldiger Professor der Botanik geworden, so wäre die Sache gut vor sich gegangen. So ist er es aber nicht geworden, sondern er ist ein sogenannter Stratege geworden. Und dutch das, was in ihm lag: nur denken zu können im Sinne der Gespenstgespinste der naturwissenschaftlichen Richtung, konnte er nicht das, was sich in seiner Seele entlud, ins Bewußtsein heraufbekommen; denn diese Denkweise ist nicht geeignet, das, was da unten sich in der Seele entlädt, ins Bewußtsein heraufzubekommen. Und so ist er das Unglück eines großen Teiles der Menschheit. So ist er einer von den dreißig bis vierzig Menschen der Gegenwart, von denen äußerlich die Katastrophe abhängt, ein Mensch, der an dem Platze, an dem er steht, einfach sich sträubt gegen die Anerkennung von irgend etwas Geistigem. Es ist aber heute schon die Zeit da, wo diejenigen Menschen zum Menschenunglück werden können, die in führenden Stellungen sich gegen die Anerkennung eines Geistigen sträuben, die nicht anerkennen wollen, daß das Geistige hereinspielt namentlich in das Menschenleben. Das ist sehr wichtig, daß man diese Tatsache ins Auge faßt. Nun, wenn sie auch nicht zunächst in führenden Stellungen waren bei dieser kriegerischen Katastrophe, so sind doch diejenigen Menschen heute sehr zahlreich, die einfach aus Furchtsamkeit oder andern Gründen zurückstoßen die Welle des geistigen Lebens, die hereinflutet durch die Geister der Persönlichkeit, weil sie nur naturwissenschaftlich denken wollen.
Da liegt der Grund, warum viele Persönlichkeiten so unverständlich sind in der Gegenwart, und warum viele Persönlichkeiten so falsch beurteilt werden. Es ist unendlich tragisch, daß solche Menschen wie Ludendorff als große Menschen angesehen worden sind. Aber es ist schon einmal so, daß diese Tatsache, die ich eben angeführt habe, das ganze Urteil über die Menschen trübt. Es spielt da in die Menschen allerlei Dämonisches herein, das man ihnen zuschreibt, das sie aber eigentlich selber zurückstoßen, weil sie ein bloßes Gespenstgespinst nach dem Muster der Naturwissenschaft in ihrer Seele tragen und mit diesem die Sache nicht auffassen können. Solch ein Mensch wie derjenige, den ich eben jetzt als Beispiel angeführt habe, der lebt sich dann aus, um in allerlei solchen Dingen, wie es diese Persönlichkeit gemacht hat, sich zu betäuben über die Spaltung der Persönlichkeit, über das, was da rumort und tobt. Das ist überhaupt bei sehr vielen Menschen der Gegenwart der Fall. Sie betäuben sich über das, was eigentlich in ihrem Inneren tobt, wenn sie in eine bestimmte Lage kommen im äußeren Leben, durch das oder jenes, was sie tun; der eine prügelt seinen Nachbarn durch, der andere schreibt ein blödsinniges botanisches Buch und dergleichen. Sie betäuben sich über das, was eigentlich in ihrem Inneren tobt, und was immer darin besteht, daß ihre Persönlichkeit zu zerfallen droht; einfach unter dem Einfluß der notwendigen Zeitereignisse droht ihre Persönlichkeit zu zerfallen, weil sie sich davor fürchten, sich in den Kampf hineinzustürzen, der hinter den Kulissen in der Welt jetzt spielt und auf dessen Wellen die Geister der Persönlichkeit einziehen wollen in unsere Zeit.
Anerkennung des Geistigen erfordert einFertigwerden mit derFrage, die wir eben jetzt ins Auge fassen. Und da ist es von ungeheurer Notwendigkeit, wirklich das ernst zu nehmen, was hier so oft betont wird: Geisteswissenschaft nicht bloß als eine Theorie zu betrachten. Wenn Sie sie als eine Theorie betrachten, dann lesen Sie lieber Kochbücher und dergleichen; denn das, was bloßer Inhalt ist in der Geisteswissenschaft, ist nicht eigentlich das Wesentliche und Wichtige. Das, worauf es ankommt, ist die Art, wie man denken muß, um Geisteswissenschaft anzuerkennen. Es ist eine andere Art des Denkens als diejenige, die man gerade aus dem heute gebräuchlichen Naturanschauen gewonnen hat. Es gibt eben zwei Arten, sich Gedanken zu bilden. Die eine Art ist die zergliedernde, die unterscheidende, die gerade in der Naturwissenschaft heute eine so große Rolle spielt, wo man unterscheidet, sorgfältig unterscheidet. Sie finden das gerade in der Naturwissenschaft tonangebend. Alles, was in der Naturwissenschaft gesagt, geschrieben, getan wird, steht unter dem Einfluß der zergliedernden Denkweise, der unterscheidenden Denkweise. Man sucht stramme Definitionen. Und wenn einer heute etwas sagt, so nagelt man ihn an stramme Definitionen. Stramme Definitionen sind aber nichts weiter als Unterscheidungen der Sachen, die man definiert, von andern Sachen. Diese Denkweise ist eine Art von Maske, der sich insbesondere gern bedienen die Geister, die heute uns zerreißen möchten, die in diesem Kampfe drinnenstehen. Trivial könnte man sagen: Eine große Anzahl derjenigen Menschen, die die gegenwärtige Kriegskatastrophe herbeigeführt haben, und derjenigen, die noch drinnenstehen in dem, was die Folgen sind, sind eigentlich verrückt. Aber das ist, wie gesagt, nur etwas Triviales. Um was es sich da handelt, ist, daß man versteht, wodurch ihre Persönlichkeiten zerrissen werden. Von dieser Denkweise, zu der einen Zugang haben die verschiedenen, den Menschen auseinanderreißenden Mächte, muß man klar unterscheiden die andere, die in der Geisteswissenschaft allein angewendet wird. Sie ist eine ganz andere Vorstellungsart, eine ganz andere Denkweise. Sie ist, im Gegensatz zu der zergliedernden, eine gestaltende Denkweise. Sehen Sie genauer zu, verfolgen Sie, was ich versuche in den verschiedenen Büchern über Geisteswissenschaft auszuführen, so werden Sie sich sagen: Nicht so sehr liegt der Unterschied in dem, was mitgeteilt wird — das kann man so oder so beurteilen -, aber aufmerksam sollte man werden, daß die ganze Art der Eingliederung der ganzen Welt, die ganze Art der Vorstellungen eine andere ist. Diese ist gestaltend, sie gibt abgeschlossene Bildheiten, sie versucht Konturen und durch Konturen Farben zu geben. Das werden Sie durch die ganze Darstellung hindurch verfolgen können: sie hat nicht das Zergliedernde, welches die ganze heutige Wissenschaft hat. Dieser Unterschied des Wie muß hervorgehoben werden ebenso wie der Unterschied des Was. Also es gibt eine gestaltende Denkweise, die insbesondere ausgebildet wird und die den Zweck hat, in die übersinnlichen Welten hineinzuführen. Wenn Sie zum Beispiel das Buch nehmen «Wie erlangt man Erkenntnisse der höheren Welten?», wo ein solcher Weg in die übersinnlichen Welten vorgezeichnet wird, so werden Sie finden, daß. darin alles, was die Gedanken und Vorstellungen in Anspruch nimmt, auf gestaltendes Denken veranlagt ist.
Das ist etwas, was für die Gegenwart notwendig ist. Denn das gestaltende Denken hat eine ganz bestimmte Eigenschaft. Wenn Sie zergliedernd denken, wenn Sie so denken, wie der heutige Naturforscher denkt, dann denken Sie ebenso wie gewisse Geister der ahrimanischen Welt, und daher können diese ahrimanischen Geister in Ihre Seele hereindringen. Wenn Sie aber das gestaltende Denken nehmen, das metamorphosierte Denken, ich könnte auch sagen das Goethesche Denken, wie es sich zum Beispiel darstellt in der Gestaltung unserer Säulen und Kapitäle und so weiter, wenn Sie dieses gestaltende Denken nehmen, das auch in all den Büchern beachtet ist, die ich versuchte in die Geisteswissenschaft hineinzustellen, so ist dieses Denken eng an den Menschen gebunden. So gestaltend, wie der Mensch mit dem Denken in sich selber wirkt, vermögen es keine andern Wesen als diejenigen, die mit der normalen Menschheitsentwickelung zusammenhängen. Das ist das Eigentümliche. Dadurch können Sie nie auf falsche Wege kommen, wenn Sie sich durch die Geisteswissenschaft auf gestaltendes Denken einlassen. Da können Sie niemals sich verlieren an die verschiedenen geistigen Wesenheiten, die Einfluß gewinnen wollen auf Sie. Die gehen natürlich durchaus durch Ihre Wesenheit hindurch. Aber sobald Sie gestaltend denken, sobald Sie sich bemühen, nicht bloß zu spintisieren und zu unterscheiden, sondern so zu denken, wie es wirklich diese moderne Geisteswissenschaft will, so bleiben Sie in sich, so können Sie nicht das Gefühl der bloßen Ausgehöhltheit haben. Deshalb betont man, wenn man auf dem Standpunkt unserer Geisteswissenschaft steht, so häufig den Christus-Impuls, weil der Christus-Impuls in der geraden Linie des gestaltenden Denkens liegt. Die Evangelien kann man auch nicht verstehen, wenn man sie bloß zergliedert. Was dabei herauskommt, hat gerade die moderne protestantische Theologie gezeigt. Die zergliedert, aber es ist ihr auch alles entfallen, und es ist gar nichts mehr geblieben. Diejenigen Zyklen, die von den Evangelien handeln, die verfolgen den entgegengesetzten Weg. Sie bauen etwas auf, was gestaltet wird, um durch diese neuen Gestaltungen zum Verstehen der alten Evangelien vorzurücken. Es braucht heute tatsächlich - das ist gar nicht übertrieben — jemand nichts anderes, als sich an die Vorstellungsart, an die Denkweise dieser Geisteswissenschaft zu halten, dann können ihm diejenigen dämonischen Wesenheiten, die als Begleiterscheinungen der Geister der Persönlichkeit hereinrollen mit der neuen Welle, nichts anhaben. Daher sehen Sie, was es eigentlich für ein großer Schaden für die Menschheit ist, wenn sie sich sträubt, geisteswissenschaftlich zu denken.
Ich sagte vorhin: Es läßt sich diese Welle nicht aufhalten, wenn die Menschen sie auch abweisen, sie flutet herein, auch wenn die Menschen sich gegen sie sträuben, wenn sie sie nicht auffassen wollen. Dann kommt dasjenige heraus, was im Grunde zur Katastrophe der Gegenwart im tieferen Sinne geführt hat: das Nichtanerkennen der geistigen Welt. Das ist doch die tiefere Ursache für die heutigen katastrophalen Ereignisse, namentlich auch für die heutigen katastrophalen Seelenverfassungen. Und da es ein Kampf ist, der unten ja waltet, so gibt es kein anderes Mittel, als durch das gestaltende Denken die menschliche Persönlichkeit in sich selber plastisch auszubilden und dadurch den Kampf in der Seele zu erleben. Sonst wird der Kampf in der Außenwelt sich bleibend abspielen. Deshalb muß man schon sagen: Es ist wahrhaftig nicht richtig, wenn die Menschen sich nicht hinneigen wollen zu diesem geistigen Untergrunde der gegenwärtigen katastrophalen Weltlage. Denn Sie bemerken: Es liegt etwas außerordentlich Neues in dem, was hier gesagt worden ist; es ist ein Rechnen mit einer neuen Welle, die hereinspielt, und die durch eine ganz besondere Vorstellungsweise an den Menschen herangebracht werden soll, der in der Gegenwart lebt. Wenn man sich Gedanken, die nach dem Muster der Naturwissenschaft sind, hingibt, kann man einfach nicht der heutigen Zeit gewachsen sein. Wenn man bloß dasjenige ordnen will, was hier in der physischen Welt ist, wenn man bloß über das nachdenkt, was hier in der physischen Welt ist und nichts anderes gelten lassen will, dann zerstört man nur. Und man soll sich dann nicht wundern, wenn der Kampf, dessen man nicht Meister werden will im Geistigen, in das physische Leben hereinspielt, denn er schlägt ja herein in die Menschen. Und wenn sie ihn nicht in der Seele ausfechten wollen, so führt er den einen gegen den andern, Völker gegen Völker, Menschen gegen Menschen. Was hier in der physischen Welt geschieht, kann nur ein Abbild sein der geistigen Welt: Entweder der Mensch nimmt den Kampf so, daß er ihn in seiner Seele ausficht, das heißt, die Menschen vertiefen sich geistig, oder aber dieser Kampf, der durch das Bewußtsein wie durch ein Sieb hindurchgeht, wenn man bloß so denken will, wie die Gegenwart denkt, entlädt sich, indem er den Menschen, die menschliche Seele ausschaltet in der äußeren Welt, und verursacht alles das, was Sie eben jetzt sehen. Sie werden, wenn Sie so etwas bedenken, einsehen, daß es wirklich der heutigen Menschheit obliegt, sich zum Geiste hinzuwenden, daß dies notwendig vorgezeichnet wird von den Weltereignissen.
Betrachten wir eine solche Zeit, wie sie uns dargeboten wird an der Jahreswende, wo wir doch ein wenig auf das Kommende hinblicken sollen, das wahrhaftig in einer erschütternden Perspektive vor uns steht. Sehen Sie, meine lieben Freunde, das ist es, was man erreichen muß: daß man sich nicht betäubt, indem man die Perspektive der Zukunft doch zu verschlafen versucht. Ich habe Ihnen gestern aus diesem Grunde die Perspektive vorgeführt, die ein Mensch entworfen hat, der rechnet, der nun wirklich die Dinge nicht aus Sympathien und Antipathien heraus streut, sondern der sie berechnet. Ich habe das aus dem Grunde getan, damit Sie sehen, wozu ein rechnender Materialist in der heutigen Zeit kommt. Die Menschheit schickt sich zu etwas ganz anderem an als dazu, wirklich einmal Ernst zu machen mit der Anerkennung der Tatsache, daß zum Heil der Menschheit die geistige Welt anerkannt werden muß. Wer die geistige Welt und ihr Verhältnis zur physischen Welt durchschaut, der weiß, daß gewisse Gesetze herrschen, wenn das auch keine logische Folge ist, aber die logische Folge liegt eben im zergliedernden, nicht im gestaltenden Denken, nicht im anschauenden Denken, das ich charakterisiert habe. Sie sehen, solche Gesetze walten auch äußerlich nicht so, daß sie ganz stramm ziffernmäßig vorhanden sind, aber sie sind da. Nehmen Sie nur einmal solch ein Gesetz, das natürlich auch Ausnahmen hat: daß — zum Heile der Menschen — ungefähr ebensoviel Männer wie Frauen über die Erde hin geboren werden. Es könnte ja, rein theoretisch gedacht, zum Unheil der Menschheit doch auch einmal eintreten, daß in irgendeinem Jahrhundert nur ein Zwanzigstel der Menschheit Männer wären, und die andern alle als Frauen geboren würden! Solche Gesetze also, die sich nicht mit der gewöhnlichen Logik begründen lassen, sondern die nur geisteswissenschaftlich zu durchschauen sind, solche Gesetze gibt es. Ein solches Gesetz aber ist auch dieses: In dem Maße, in dem die Menschen ihre Seele durchdringen mit Anerkennung des Geistigen, wie ich es heute geschildert habe, so daß also auch dasjenige, was in einem Zeitalter geistig ist, herabfließt in das Bewußtsein, in dem Maße kann sich auch das gewöhnliche Zusammenleben in der Menschheit entfalten, in dem Maße können die Menschen über die antisozialen Triebe, über das, was der Sozialisierung entgegenarbeitet, hinauskommen.
Es haben die Menschen heute nur nicht den Mut, das Geistige wirklich in ihr Bewußtsein hereinspielen zu lassen. Aber wenigstens einige Menschen sollten wissen, daß es sich darum handelt, heute ins unmittelbare Bewußtsein das Geistige hereinspielen zu lassen. Betrachten Sie von diesem Gesichtspunkte aus bestimmte Zeiterscheinungen, ich möchte sagen, Zeitliebhabereien, dann werden Sie sehen, wie die Menschen heute einen Drang haben, aus ihrem Bewußtsein den Zusammenhang mit dem geistigen Gesetze des Daseins auszuschließen. Und wie sogar im praktischen Handeln mit solchen Dingen zu rechnen ist, durch die der bewußte Zusammenhang ausgeschlossen werden kann, habe ich Ihnen neulich einmal vorgeführt, als ich von den Begabtenprüfungen sprach. Da will man möglichst nicht mehr einen unmittelbar elementaren Zusammenhang mit der Begabung des Schülers haben, sondern durch allerlei äußere Maßregeln Gedächtnis, Verständniskräfte prüfen, damit man nicht zu denken braucht. Deshalb haben die Leute die Mathematik so gern. Da stellt man erst einige Regeln auf, und dann wird mechanisch gerechnet. Da braucht man nicht die Einzelheiten mit der Intelligenz zu verfolgen. Man könnte ja auch nicht. Nicht wahr, Sie können sich nebeneinander drei, vier, fünf Bohnen vielleicht vorstellen, auch zehn Bohnen noch, zwanzig sich auf einen Blick vorzustellen, wird schon schwer gehen. Aber denken Sie sich, Sie sollten sich jetzt tausend oder gar eine Million auf einen Blick vorstellen! Aber rechnen können Sie es ganz gut, weil Sie da mechanisch den Ansatz machen; Sie brauchen die Einzelheit dessen, was Sie da tun, nicht mit der Intelligenz zu verfolgen. Das lieben aber die Menschen heute ganz besonders, wenn man ihnen etwas beweisen kann, wobei sie nicht eigentlich mit der Intelligenz dabeizusein brauchen. Wenn man an sie den Anspruch macht, sie sollen alle einzelnen Etappen des Beweises verfolgen, so ist das den Menschen furchtbar unangenehm. Daher soll lieber die Sache beweisen, ohne daß der Mensch dabei ist. Man möchte am liebsten die Sache, die geistige Welt, so beweisen, daß sie sich da draußen selber zeigt: Spiritismus und dergleichen. Den Menschen ist es furchtbar, daß die Geisteswissenschaft den Anspruch erhebt, daß man wirklich dabei ist, daß man aktiv ist in den einzelnen Etappen. Ohne das ist aber Geisteswissenschaft gar nicht denkbar. Daher liebt man auch die Symbole der alten Geheimwissenschaft und dergleichen. Man liebt Ritualien, von denen die Leute sagen: Sie spielen sich vor uns ab, aber wir brauchen nicht sie mit unserer Intelligenz zu verfolgen, wir brauchen uns keine Vorstellung davon zu machen, was da eigentlich geschieht -, und dergleichen. Doch das ist schon etwas, was moderne Geisteswissenschaft haben muß: dieses Verfolgen des einzelnen.
Es ist sehr merkwürdig: Im Osten von Europa haben wir aufkeimend, was eigentlich auf die nächste Epoche wartet. Da werden, gerade im Osten, allerlei Dinge getrieben, welche zeigen, wie man das, was eigentlich nur mit dem Netz der Intelligenz umspannt werden soll, mit der Intelligenz durchdringen will. Im Zeitalter des Bewußtseins, wo die Intelligenz wirken soll, wo das alles in das Netz der Intelligenz eingespannt werden soll, da sucht man das Intelligente hineinzubringen. Nehmen Sie zum Beispiel nur einmal die Art, wie namentlich in Rußland Propaganda getrieben worden ist, um in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten den Sturz des Zarentums allmählich herbeizuführen! In diesem geknechteten, geknuteten Rußland konnte man natürlich nicht eine ganz offene Propaganda treiben. Das wäre alles polizeilich konfisziert worden, was man irgendwie als Propagandaschriften verbreitet hätte. Reden durfte man auch nicht. Dennoch, in einer verhältnismäßig kurzen Zeit, von 1900 bis 1904, sind in Rußland sechzig Millionen antizaristische Schriften erschienen. Von diesen sechzig Millionen Schriften sind nur zwanzig bis fünfundzwanzig Prozent polizeilich aufgespürt worden, die andern sind hinausgegangen, und Ungeheueres ist erschienen in der Zeit, die dem Sturz des Zarentums vorangegangen ist; ein großer Teil des Volkes war dadurch vorbereitet auf diesen Sturz des Zarentums. Worauf beruht es denn, daß — trotzdem alles, was nur irgendwie aufgespürt werden konnte, sorgfältig polizeilich konfisziert wurde - dennoch von sechzig Millionen Schriften, die alle hingearbeitet haben auf die Revolution, auf den Sturz des Zarentums, kaum ein Viertel der Beschlagnahme verfallen ist? Das beruht darauf, daß die leitenden Führer der Agitation auf etwas ganz Bestimmtes gekommen sind, was heute ungeheuer wichtig ist, was aber die Menschen durchaus nicht einsehen wollen. Wenn man es aber in ahrimanischem Sinne, wie diese Führer, einsieht, dann kann man ungeheuer stark wirken. Die sind darauf gekommen, daß irgend etwas, was man mit denselben Worten ausspricht, in ganz verschiedener Weise wirkt, ob man es einem Polizeimann, der stramm zaristisch denkt, oder ob man es einem Menschen aus dem Volke vorlegt. Dieselben Sätze, die, wenn sie nur in der entsprechenden Weise gesagt sind, auf den Polizeimann lammfromm wirken, die können unter Umständen unter dem Volke in furchtbarstem Sinne sozialistisch wirken. Allerdings, man hat nicht solche Schriften geschrieben, wie sie jetzt in der Schweiz geschrieben werden, die dann konfisziert werden, sondern man hatte Bücher oder Broschüren verbreitet über Botanik, über Pflanzen, die einfach durch die Art der Abfassung im eminentesten Sinne die Seelen so präpatierten, daß Rußland wirklich im Jahre 1917 auf die Revolution vorbereitet war. Hinter das Geheimnis zu kommen, daß eine Sache, die man sagt, auf den einen ganz anders wirkt als auf den andern, das ist ungeheuer wichtig. Allerdings wird das gerade sorgfältig studiert, und die Studien, die auf diesem Gebiete gemacht werden, sind so recht charakteristisch für unsere Zeit. Sie sind eigentlich etwas von dem, was sich am allerärgsten gegen das sträubt, was geisteswissenschaftlich in die Welt hereinkommt. Ich kann mir zum Beispiel nicht denken, daß es etwas gibt, was sich stärker gegen das eigentliche Urelement des Geistigen sträubt, als solche Bücher wie die von Nikolai Rubakin, der es versucht, in ganz neuartiger Weise, aber eben in einer Weise, die dem Lebendigen der Geisteswissenschaft ganz entgegenstrebt, die Menschenseele zu studieren, so daß man gewissermaßen die Intelligenz festhält, wie sie wirkt, aber die Aktivität der Intelligenz in dem Wirken ausschließen kann. Das Streben solch eines Menschen rechnet damit: In unserer Zeit will alles intelligent geschehen, aber man soll nicht durch Anstrengung der subjektiven Intelligenz überall mitwirken. Deshalb hat er in einer ungeheuer weitgetriebenen Art das Folgende versucht.
Er organisierte das Studium der Leser, der Menschen, die etwas lesen. Er läßt sich mitteilen, welches ihre Lieblingsbücher sind, was in diesen Büchern besonders auf sie wirkt, wie sie durch diese Bücher an Einfluß gewonnen haben. Und die Fragen, die dabei gestellt werden an die Leute, sind so gestellt, daß man nicht etwa mit den Sympathien und Antipathien für die Bücher rechnet, sondern daß gerade diese ausgeschaltet sind, daß eigentlich nur das objektive Wirken der Intelligenz in Betracht kommt. Das ist die eine Art: daß er die Leser sich selber so zergliedern läßt, daß sie ihm einfach durch die Fragestellung, die er gibt, Sachen sagen, durch die er tiefer in ihre Seelen hineinschaut, als sie selber es tun.
Die andere Seite ist diese, daß er nun in Tausenden und Tausenden von Fällen wiederum durch solch raffinierte Fragestellungen die Bücher von den Menschen analysieren läßt, die erscheinen. Es wird ganz abgesehen davon, ob das Buch ein mathematisches oder ein botanisches oder ein politisches oder sozialistisches oder anarchistisches ist, das kommt weniger in Betracht, denn das ist der Inhalt, und die Menschen achten nicht darauf, daß der Inhalt nur der eine Teil ist. Aber er läßt feststellen, wie das Buch wirkt durch die Schönheit seiner Sätze oder dadurch, daß der Verfasser Temperament verrät, oder langweilig schreibt, also lauter Eigenschaften, durch die man die objektiv waltende Intelligenz, die in den Büchern nun statistisch festgestellt wird, kennenlernt. Die ganze Art geht darauf hin, die innerhalb des Zeitalters wirkende Intelligenz in der Ausströmung und in dem Aufnehmen kennenzulernen. Würde man eine solche Wissenschaft bis zu einem gewissen Grade ausgebildet haben, dann könnte man auch einmal über den Jupiter ein Buch schreiben, das ein furchtbar revolutionäres Buch sein würde, und auf der andern Seite ein Buch über das erste rechte Bein der Maikäfer, und dieses würde ebenso dem Zweck dienen können, wie das andere Buch über den Jupiter. Denn da handelt es sich wirklich nicht darum, was man sagt, sondern wie man es sagt, weil man dadurch kennenlernt, was als Intelligenz objektiv in der Menschheit wirkt, dessen sich die Menschen aber nicht bewußt sind. Man wirkt jetzt nicht nur subjektiv, indem man seine eigene Intelligenz, wie beim Rechnen, nicht mittun läßt, sondern man wirkt in dem, was als Intelligenz waltet, aber nicht in dem, was diese Intelligenz von Mensch zu Mensch anwendet, sondern indem man die subjektive Intelligenz ganz ausschaltet.
Man könnte heute eine Hochschule begründen, welche auf Grund einer solchen Wissenschaft sich die Aufgabe stellte, revolutionäre Propaganda zu betreiben einfach dadurch, daß man in der Richtlinie vorgeht, wie ich es Ihnen angedeutet habe. Solche Bestrebungen gibt es in der Gegenwart. Sie alle gehen eigentlich darauf hinaus, den Menschen im Zeitalter der Intelligenz nicht in diese Intelligenz hereinzuholen, sondern ihn gerade hinauszuwerfen aus der Intelligenz. Es ist dasselbe, was nicht will, daß der Mensch bewußt, mit dem Bewußtsein, das schon einmal das Bewußtsein der Gegenwart ist, die geistige, die spirituelle Welt aufnimmt. Das aber ist notwendig. Und nur das kann der Menschheit Heil bringen in der Gegenwart und in der nächsten Zukunft: sich kühn und mutig dem Hereinspielen der geistigen Welt zu überlassen. Weder durch Begabtenprüfungen noch dadurch, daß man Bücher und Leser statistisch untersucht, wird man zu dem kommen, was heraus will aus dem, was gerade im Menschen jetzt lebt, sondern man wird anders vorgehen. Denn worauf läuft das alles hinaus? Man kann, wenn man trivial sprechen wollte, sagen: All diese Bestrebungen, gerade diese von Rubakin und so weiter, laufen darauf hinaus, daß der Mensch eigentlich heute aus seiner Haut fahren will, weil er in der Haut in die Notwendigkeit versetzt ist, sich seiner Intelligenz zu bedienen, sie aber auf das spirituelle Leben anzuwenden. Der Mensch möchte aus seiner Haut heraus, möchte nicht in seiner Haut leben, weil er weiß: da strömt ein Lebendiges herein. Aber es ist ihm unangenehm, mit diesem Lebendigen bekanntzuwerden; also möchte er heraus. Er möchte selbst das intelligente Wesen verobjektivieren, möchte heraus und sich neben sich setzen, damit diese Welle durch ihn hindurchgehen kann. Das ist aber dasjenige, was Geisteswissenschaft will: eine Wissenschaft, die eben nicht innerhalb der Haut beschlossen worden ist, weil man nicht auf unrechtmäßige Weise durch solche Experimente, wie ich es gesagt habe, aus der Haut herausfahren soll. Den Drang dazu haben schon die Menschen. Die Menschen sollen aber in der Wirklichkeit das Wissen aufnehmen, das durch den gesunden Menschenverstand aufgenommen werden kann. Man braucht nicht immer selber leibfrei zu werden, um ein Wissen zu erwerben, welches in der Welt so handelt, daß das Handeln unabhängig von dem ist, was man mit dem Wirkungskreis des Leibes vollbringt. Das ist die Aufgabe der Wahrheit, und das andere sind die Karikaturen der Wahrheit. Diese Karikaturen aber der eigentlichen spirituellen Aufgabe in der Gegenwart, die sind es, welche das Unheil unserer Zeit, das Landen in Sackgassen bewirken.
Sieht man in dieser Weise hinein in dasjenige, was in unserer Zeit waltet, dann weiß man, woher es kommt, daß Menschen, die nicht den eigentlichen Geist anerkennen wollen, die aber, wenn sie ehrlich sind, nicht dazu kommen, sich zu betäuben, sich klarmachen, was der Menschheit bevorsteht, wenn sie beim Materialismus bleiben will. Und man muß einsehen, daß in der Hinlenkung zum Geiste dasjenige liegt, was einen durchaus nicht in die Notwendigkeit versetzt, Pessimist zu werden. Wenn man sich klarmacht, wie wenig heute noch die Menschen geneigt sind, so in die spirituelle Welt hineinzugehen, wie es die Geisteswissenschaft verlangt, dann sieht man schon, wo die tieferen Ursachen des Verfalls in unserer Zeit liegen.
Es sind auch in diesen Jahren wiederum allerlei Weihnachtsartikel erschienen. Man sollte gar nicht glauben, daß gegenüber dem Ernste dieser Zeit solches Zeug erscheint, wie es jetzt vielfach wiederum erschienen ist. Die Leute schreiben ja alle furchtbar gut, sie schreiben furchtbar nett, schreiben, wie sich die Menschen lieben sollen. Sie hassen sich zwar so, wie sie sich noch nie gehaßt haben, aber geschrieben wird, wie man sich lieben soll, wie man die Feinde lieben soll und so weiter. Kurz, man schreibt so, wie auch die Dame schreibt, welche die «Briefe einer Frau an Walther Rathenau» geschrieben hat. Man schreibt so, daß eigentlich, geistig angesehen, das Vorstellen, das diesem Schreiben zugrunde liegt, in einer ganz eigentümlichen Weise verläuft. Die Leute schreiben von Menschenliebe, von Christentum, von allem möglichen. Es ist sehr schön, was sie schreiben, und die Leute, die es lesen, finden auch, daß es wunderschön ist. Und dennoch sind es nichts anderes als abgebrauchte Begriffsmünzen, die so fortkollern im Kopf oder im Herzen. Und indem sie so kollern, so rollen, steht der Schreibende oder der Lesende dahinter, und dann wirkt das so wie Zuckerbrot, wenn man sich in der Liebe zu solchen Worten wollüstig ergeht. Man kann so schön träumen, wenn man sagt: Der Christus hat gesprochen von Nächstenliebe, das Christentum muß wiederum aufblühen — und so weiter. Man braucht sich da nicht aus der innersten Seele heraus, mit dem ganzen Menschen auf die konkrete geistige Welt einzulassen, wie die Geisteswissenschaft es verlangt. Aber gerade darauf kommt es an, daß man Einst mit diesen Sachen macht. Wenn diese Sachen theoretisch anerkannt werden, und dann doch die Menschen wiederum nichts anderes tun als den Wilsonianismus verehren oder in nationalen Chauvinismus verfallen und so reden, wie man heute eben redet, dann bleibt diese katastrophale Zeit. Und sie wird so lange bleiben, bis sich die Menschen darauf einlassen, die geistige Welt wirklich so aufzunehmen, wie heute die geistige Welt aufgenommen werden muß: mit dem Bewußtsein, konkret, ohne Furcht und ohne Zaghaftigkeit.
So daß wir, wenn wir hineinschauen in das neue Weltenjahr, auf der einen Seite die Menschen sehen, wie sie, nur um sich betäuben zu können, prophetisch politisieren, Völkerbünde begründen, welche die Kriege aus der Welt schaffen sollen. Freilich fangen die Leute heute schon an, trotzdem sie damit renommieren, daß ein neuer «Wiener Kongreß» nicht kommen soll, sich zu sagen, sie würden froh sein, wenn der Versailler Kongreß so viele Monate den Frieden bewirke, wie der Wiener Kongreß Jahre des Friedens bewirkt hat. Nun, die Menschen mögen eben Gedanken, die sie betäuben! Der hauptsächlichste heutige Betäubungsgedanke für die Menschheit ist dieser, daß nun, nachdem man einige andere abgesägt hat, Wilson der richtige Mann für die Zukunft ist. Er ist der große Mann, nicht wahr? Ein Mann, der vierzehn abstrakte Gedanken für fähig hält, die Welt des Erdendaseins in ein Paradies zu verwandeln! Aber es ist bequem, es ist dasjenige, was einen betäuben kann. Und es ist unbequemer, sich zu sagen: Wenn nicht eine solche Perspektive dastehen soll vor uns, wie die von Rathenau geschaute, ist es notwendig, daß möglichst viele Leute zu einer bewußten Anerkennung der geistigen Welt kommen. Das möchte man in einigen Seelen wenigstens bewirken, nachdem man sich zu einer solchen Silvesterempfindung herbeigelassen hat, wie wir sie gestern durch unsere Seelen ziehen ließen: daß die Wahrheit dieser Silvesterempfindungen so in den Seelen erlebt werde, daß sie sich sagen: Bleibt man stehen bei dem, woran sich die Menschheit in ihrem Denken gewöhnt hat und was wahrhaftig nicht bei einem Volke, sondern bei allen Völkern über das Erdenrund hin waltet, dann ist diese Perspektive von Rathenau richtig. — Sie braucht nicht richtig zu sein! Es ist in der Möglichkeit der Menschen gelegen, daß diese Perspektive nicht richtig zu sein braucht. Das kann die Neujahrsbetrachtung sein, daß man den Willen walten lasse, daß diese Perspektive nicht richtig sei. Dazu ist aber notwendig, daß man sich von allen Vorurteilen absondert, die man heute noch in sich hegt, indem man Urältestes wiederum hervorholt, um sich darinnen wollüstig zu ergehen, daß man sich viel mehr einläßt auf das wirklich Neue.
Derjenige, der das einsieht, der wird wissen, wo man den Geist sucht, und da wird Aussicht sein für ein Heil in der Zukunft. Wo man den Geist nicht suchen wird, man mag da Sieger oder Besiegter sein, da wird nicht Heil sein in der Zukunft! Mögen die Menschen des einen Teiles der Welt von den andern Milliarden verlangen, diese Milliarden, sie werden zu einem glühenden Golde werden und vernichtend wirken, während auf der andern Seite die Armut, wenn sie vom Geist beflügelt ist, doch die Menschen emportragen wird in die Höhen, in welche die Zukunft der Menschenentwickelung hinführen soll.
Aber das muß man empfinden aus innerer Einsicht in den Gang des Geistes. Und kein Hinblicken auf irgend etwas Äußerliches, kein Schwören auf neue Götzen, wie es sich jetzt vorbereitet, kann die Menschheit retten, sondern nur das Sich-Halten an den Geist, das Halten zum Geiste, das Wirken im Geiste.
Eighth Lecture
A ray of light that can truly illuminate shines on such reviews of the past as we undertook yesterday, if one first considers, so to speak, the negative side of the matter, if one asks oneself, as we have done so often before: What are the deeper impulses that have led humanity in the present to such catastrophic events and, more importantly, to a certain catastrophic state of affairs, as is so clearly evident in the circumstances? Of course, it is not always possible to immediately turn one's gaze to the deeper foundations of world events. One will first turn one's gaze to what I would call the more superficial layer of events. One will then be able to describe this or that, and one will by no means be wrong in doing so. This is something that must always be taken into account when one wants to proceed seriously from spiritual-scientific considerations. Such spiritual-scientific considerations do not mean that other things are always incorrect. But they want to point out, especially today, that it is not enough to remain at a certain superficial level of world observation, but that it is necessary to penetrate deeper into the circumstances. Nothing particularly new is to be said in this direction today, but some things should be remembered which, if we take them as a kind of New Year's perspective, are suitable for entering in the right way into this perspective which lies before us in many respects in a shocking way.
You will recall how I have explained in recent days that one of the most important, indeed essential, aspects of understanding the present time is that humanity is, in a sense, facing a new revelation. It is the revelation that is to take place, and in a certain sense is already taking place, through the spirits of personality, which, if one may express it thus, are rising to the dignity of creators, whereas we, as creators in the world history of humanity, have hitherto only been able to address those spirits which are called Elohim in the Bible, which we call the spirits of form. Something creative will therefore emerge within what human beings can perceive when observing the external world.
Now it lies in certain conditions of human nature that human beings initially resist recognizing such an incoming spiritual element. Human beings, especially in the present, do not want to accept such an intrusion of a spiritual element. Now we must distinguish between two things, especially when we consider this present new revelation. To make myself clearer, I would like to say the following.
The famous Cardinal Newman said something remarkable when he was invested in Rome. He said that he saw no other salvation for the Church than a new revelation. That was decades ago, and various things have been said here and there in the world about Cardinal Newman's remarkable view. But if one looks at what has been said about this by the Church and by those who are close to the Church's confession, it has been pointed out everywhere that one should not speak of a new revelation, but rather that one should hold fast to the old revelation. And above all, if anything is necessary, it is only that the old revelation be better understood than it has been understood up to now.
In these objections, which have been raised from all possible sides against the statement of the cardinal, who thus had an intuition of the advent of a new revelation, one sees how humanity resists such a revelation. Now, as I have said, two things must be distinguished. The fact that people resist accepting such a revelation does not, of course, eliminate the fact that this revelation is coming. This revelation pours forth like a new spiritual wave through the events in which human beings are involved. Human beings cannot push this wave back from the earth. It pours forth over the earth. That is one fact.
So, I would like to say that for some time now, especially since the beginning of the 20th century — or more precisely, since about 1899 — we, as human beings walking around in the world, have been standing within a new wave of spiritual life that is pouring into the other life of humanity. And a spiritual researcher today is simply a person who admits this, that is, who notices that something like this has broken into the life of humanity. That is one fact.
The other fact is that human beings—precisely in their present state—need a certain amount of effort, a certain amount of activity, in order to notice that such a wave is pouring into life. This has led to the significant situation that, on the one hand, this wave has really poured into life and is there, but on the other hand, human beings do not want to notice it. They resist it. You must not view this fact in the abstract. For the centers, so to speak, the focal points in which this wave discharges itself in much the same way as the electric current in the coherer in wireless telegraphy, the coherers in this field are the human souls. And do not be deceived: the fact is that, by living on earth, human beings, simply by being human beings of the 20th century, are receptive instruments for what is pouring into life in the manner I have described. Man may resist admitting this with his consciousness, but he cannot prevent his soul from receiving the wave impulse, from the wave impulse being within him.
Now we must examine this fact more closely. We must ask ourselves what different assumptions we can now make after weeks of reflection. We must ask: What is the most significant ability of the human soul in our age? It is intellectuality. And when it is repeatedly and quite rightly emphasized that human beings should also develop their other soul forces, not just their intellect, this emphasis is so intense today precisely because human beings feel that intellect is the true ability of the age, and because intellect is about to overwhelm them, they must not allow their other abilities to atrophy. Precisely because intellectuality plays such an important role in the age of the consciousness soul, there is such an intense emphasis today on not allowing feelings and sensations to atrophy, which is of particular importance in view of the striking fact that intellectuality plays such a major role.
Now we must form a clear idea of this intellectuality. I have spoken about this intellectuality from various points of view. You may remember that even in public lectures I have not failed to say what is necessary about intellectuality in the present age. For example, I have spoken about the fact that in our scientific view of the world, which has actually taken hold in all circles—everyone today thinks scientifically, even if they know nothing about science—we have something that makes particular use of intellectuality. Even when we experiment, even when we observe, we process the experiments or the results of the experiments, we process the observations with intellectuality. It is precisely in the scientific worldview to which humanity has become so accustomed in the present day, from whose perspective it also wants to view social life, for example, that this intellectuality reigns and weaves entirely. But how does it weave? I have often discussed the question in public lectures: What kind of picture of the world does one actually gain through a scientific worldview? Ultimately, one realizes that what one can imagine of the world through the usual scientific habits of thought is not reality, but a ghost or a sum of ghosts, even our atoms and everything one imagines in the world of atoms. But even those who are more positivist, who do not give much credence to the atomic hypothesis, such as Poincaré, Avenarius, or Mach, imagine nature in such a way that in their ideas there is actually nothing real in which nature plays a role, but rather a ghost of nature. This is connected with what I said here a few days ago: that the world of concepts in which we live today, in the age of the conscious soul, does not actually contain realities, but only images, mirror images. And it is already an extraordinary gain if one does not cling to the superstition that when one reads a scientific book or hears a scientific discussion, one hears talk of reality. If one becomes aware of what is being communicated, it is actually only an image, a kind of ghost of reality. But what lives in such ideas, which are really only ghostly images that do not connect with reality in the same way as Goethe's ideas of metamorphosis, is something that we today, in a certain sense, like very much, love very much. And we want to capture reality in this web of ghostly ideas. All those people who talk today about a monistic worldview and the like, or who otherwise justify the positivist worldview, actually believe with a strange superstition in the significance of these ghostly webs. They believe that they can extract a picture of reality from what today's scientific view gives them, which they cannot do. So people love this ghostly nature of the worldview that they can construct for themselves based on the current stage of human development. And the fact that, on the one hand, people love their world of ideas, but on the other hand, this world of ideas only provides images, dominates the souls of today. And the souls that are dominated in this way by their striving for ideas are the ones that resist the breaking in of a spiritual wave, which is indeed reality and which cannot initially be caught by the mere ghostly web of ideas developed on the basis of natural science. One can only cope with these things if one is quite clear that this scientific way of thinking prepares people to reject the positive spiritual element that comes into play in the world. And that is why they resist, fearfully resist, the wave that I have said is coming in and spreading, and that nevertheless lives in the souls of human beings.
Thus, in people today, especially in those who set the tone, there is something that this wave cannot grasp; there is something of the impact of this wave, but at the same time there is something in their consciousness that this wave cannot grasp. One can often describe the pattern of today's human being in this way: if this is the human being, then here is one layer of the soul, and here is a second layer of the soul. Here above, in this layer (see drawing, II), is consciousness, today's consciousness, which is particularly trained in the natural sciences. But the wave I am talking about passes through the other layer (red). Now it would be a matter of consciousness not merely occupying itself with what is spun into ghostly fantasies, but of consciousness allowing what is down there to flow into itself, of consciousness taking in what is down there.

If you consider this, you will find something that is of extraordinary importance for understanding the constitution of the soul today. For we would not have had this terrible catastrophe of war, or rather the warlike expression of this catastrophe — the catastrophe that is raging in humanity is, of course, variously shaped, it has different sides, the war that has been spoken of is only one side — this war aspect of the catastrophe, that which has raged mainly in the last four and a half years, we could not have experienced at all if this spiritual fact had not existed. One must look very closely at this spiritual fact if one wants to understand it. One must ask oneself: What is actually happening with this wave that is going on?
It is a wave that is initially just below the surface of what we normally pay attention to. One might ask: What actually lives in this wave in which the spirits of personality are moving? Certainly, the spirits of personality live there, wanting to reveal themselves anew as creators, but there are many other things living in this wave. For you see, you can simply imagine a sea with ships sailing on it, and in these ships there may be all kinds of personalities moving on the waves; let them be images of the spirits of personalities. But the waves themselves are there, they also represent something. In the sea, we have, so to speak, only the blind element of water, but it can also have its quirks. But in this spiritual wave I am talking about, something else is represented. What floods into the souls, what really strikes the souls, is struggle, a world struggle that is taking place behind the scenes of the present world, so to speak. Human beings are caught up in this world struggle. The perception of the spirits of personality of which I speak is by no means, I would say, a comfortable, pleasant thing for the spiritual researcher. It cannot be described in such a way that one could say to a person: I will make you a spirit viewer because it offers you tremendous bliss, because you can swim quite comfortably in spiritual perception. Most people would like that. They want to be given something like a potion when they enter the spiritual world today. They shy away from receiving anything that is not a potion, anything that they cannot say: It makes me feel so comfortable, so at ease. That is precisely not what it is about today. Today it is about actually feeling a struggle passing through you, a struggle that is taking place behind the scenes of the world, a struggle that must take place because it is necessary for the development of the world as it must be.
One can point to various things that characterize this world development as it must be. I will mention only one. In the older, pre-Christian times — towards the time when the Mystery of Golgotha took place, it then diminished — it was quite natural for souls who were attentive, at least throughout the pagan world, to have impressions that there were repeated earth lives. This old life was completely different from what we are inclined to imagine today. Today, we distinguish between people who have a school education and those who do not. In earlier times, a distinction was made between people who were attentive to repeated lives on earth and those who were not. But this receded, and I have often spoken of how it was precisely the task of Christianity to allow this wave of development, which awakens in human beings the consciousness of repeated earthly lives, to recede for a while. When one says something like this, one usually exposes oneself to all kinds of misunderstandings. One is accused of contradictions which, if one speaks in detail, one would like to and can resolve oneself. I said this again recently somewhere, and someone immediately wrote to me asking whether I did not know that the Bible itself speaks of reincarnation. Of course, one finds in my writings the references to where this is spoken of in the Bible; that goes without saying. But the question is not whether reincarnation can be spoken of in the Bible through a very broad interpretation. The whole constitution of the Bible is such that reincarnation is not something that is explicitly stated in the Bible, not something that can be said to be handed down. It is simply that it was necessary for the development of humanity that for a time the consciousness of repeated earth lives receded, so that human beings could become accustomed to taking one earth life seriously and intensively. But now we are, in a sense, returning to this matter; now we are at a point where we cannot move forward unless we turn our gaze to repeated earth lives. Now, once again, those spiritual elements that want to bring human beings the awareness of repeated earthly lives must fight a hard battle behind the scenes of existence against those who want to allow only the old elements and impulses into human consciousness. This is a significant battle in which one must take part if one wants to look behind the scenes of human evolution, of world evolution itself!
One should not imagine that behind the scenes of sensory existence there is something in which one can lie down and sleep so comfortably. This is usually how materialistic people imagine paradise. They like to imagine that when the gates of death close, they will have the opportunity to sleep a great deal. Because this sleep is also very comfortable, people prefer to imagine it this way. Now, you know that this is not the case. But even behind the scenes of existence, it is not the case that one can necessarily have only the desire to satisfy all those instincts that one would like to have out of one's personal egoism. So one becomes a participant in a struggle, a real struggle.
Now the following is true: if people did not resist looking at this struggle, if they were willing to look behind the scenes of existence for the messages given by spiritual researchers, then people would view existence today in a completely different way. What I have always emphasized is that we should gain interest in one another, but how we are to gain this interest is in reality inconceivable without allowing spiritual science to shine into our lives. Isn't it true that when we enter into relationships with people — and every human being enters into relationships with other people — we get to know people we consider good, we get to know people we find more indifferent, we get to know people we consider evil, who do all kinds of things to us, through whom we experience all kinds of bad things. Certainly, in our outer life on the physical plane, we have no choice but to stick with people. If someone slaps you in the face, you cannot, if you feel the urge to slap them back, stick to anything other than that person. But this view is no longer sufficient for the conditions of our time. We must admit that this view is no longer sufficient for the conditions of our time. It is much more in keeping with the conditions of our time to say: Some person is lying to you, or another person is doing this or that. Certainly, in physical life, you have to stick with people. But the important thing is to be aware that all kinds of spiritual impulses are at work in people, and that is what we are actually dealing with. Of course, if someone slaps you in the face, you cannot slap back at some demon that drove them to do it; you have to stick with the person who is physically standing in front of you in physical life. But what is so necessary, I would say, behind the scenes of existence, is really not enough to understand the world, and in particular it is not enough to really grasp social life properly. In other words, people today cannot get by unless they truly recognize a spiritual world in reality, in concreteness, behind what is happening physically. That is very important. People are largely afraid of this.
This fear is certainly not unfounded. If you are not completely sober, dry people—of course, there are none of those here—then you will get something like goose bumps when you think that you are actually the scene of the activity of all kinds of spiritual beings, as is actually the case. Once you are aware that you are the scene of the activity of all kinds of spiritual beings, you feel that you are losing yourself to these spiritual beings that are stuffing you. You feel like a sack stuffed with all kinds of beings. This feeling is certainly not unjustified, this goose bumps; but it cannot truly be eliminated by denying the fact that one is such a sack, by closing one's consciousness to it, so to speak, and making oneself blind and deaf to what is reality. Help must be found in another way.
Now, there is a very important fact here. Suppose there is a human being, a human being who is struck by the wave of struggle but who is not inclined to give anything to spiritual life, who surrenders himself to the way of thinking of the present age in the most eminent sense, the way of thinking that is based on the pattern of the scientific worldview. One must really take these things seriously, because in our time one cannot receive a ray of light, but only surrender to Rathenau's pessimism if one does not look at these things. Take the following example. Suppose a man like Ludendorff had become a professor of botany. He would probably have become an excellent professor of botany, would have achieved extraordinary things as a professor of botany, would, as they say, have become a famous button, so famous that it could even have satisfied his ambition, but he would not have made as many people unhappy as he did. Now he was not in a position where he was an innocent professor of botany—innocent now in the context of the world; he would probably have tormented those who had to take exams with him to some extent—but let us assume that he had become an innocent professor of botany in the context of the world, then things would have gone well. But that is not what he became; instead, he became a so-called strategist. And because of what lay within him: being able to think only in terms of the fantasies of the scientific direction, he could not bring what was unleashed in his soul into consciousness; for this way of thinking is not suitable for bringing what is unleashed in the soul into consciousness. And so he is the misfortune of a large part of humanity. He is one of the thirty to forty people of the present day on whom the catastrophe depends outwardly, a person who, in the position he occupies, simply resists the recognition of anything spiritual. But the time has already come when those people who, in leading positions, resist the recognition of anything spiritual, who do not want to acknowledge that the spiritual plays a role, especially in human life, can become a misfortune for humanity. It is very important to face this fact. Now, even if they were not initially in leading positions during this war catastrophe, there are still many people today who, simply out of fear or for other reasons, reject the wave of spiritual life that is flooding in through the spirits of the personality, because they only want to think scientifically.
This is the reason why many personalities are so incomprehensible in the present day, and why many personalities are so misjudged. It is infinitely tragic that people like Ludendorff have been regarded as great men. But it is already the case that the fact I have just mentioned clouds the whole judgment of human beings. All kinds of demonic forces come into play in human beings, which are attributed to them, but which they actually reject because they carry in their souls a mere phantom image based on the model of natural science and cannot grasp the matter with it. A person like the one I just mentioned as an example then lives out his life in all sorts of things, as this personality did, in order to numb himself to the split in his personality, to what is rumbling and raging within him. This is generally the case with many people today. They numb themselves to what is actually raging within them when they find themselves in a certain situation in their outer life, through this or that which they do; one beats up his neighbor, another writes a nonsensical book on botany, and so on. They numb themselves to what is actually raging inside them, and whatever that may be, their personality threatens to disintegrate; simply under the influence of the necessary events of the times, their personality threatens to disintegrate because they are afraid to throw themselves into the struggle that is now taking place behind the scenes in the world and on whose waves the spirits of personality want to enter our time.
Recognition of the spiritual requires coming to terms with the question we are now considering. And here it is of tremendous necessity to take seriously what is so often emphasized here: not to regard spiritual science merely as a theory. If you regard it as a theory, then you would be better off reading cookbooks and the like; for what is mere content in spiritual science is not actually the essential and important thing. What matters is the way one must think in order to recognize spiritual science. It is a different way of thinking from that which has been gained from the view of nature that is common today. There are two ways of forming thoughts. One way is the analytical, the discriminating way, which plays such an important role in natural science today, where one distinguishes, carefully distinguishes. You find this particularly prevalent in natural science. Everything that is said, written, and done in natural science is influenced by the analytical way of thinking, the discriminating way of thinking. People seek rigid definitions. And when someone says something today, they nail them down with rigid definitions. But rigid definitions are nothing more than distinctions between the things being defined and other things. This way of thinking is a kind of mask that is particularly popular with the spirits who want to tear us apart today, who are involved in this struggle. Trivially, one could say that a large number of those who brought about the present war catastrophe, and those who are still caught up in its consequences, are actually insane. But that is, as I said, only trivial. What is important here is to understand what is tearing their personalities apart. We must clearly distinguish between this way of thinking, which is accessible to the various forces tearing people apart, and the other way of thinking that is used in spiritual science alone. It is a completely different way of thinking, a completely different mindset. In contrast to the dissecting way of thinking, it is a creative way of thinking. If you look more closely and follow what I am trying to explain in the various books on spiritual science, you will say to yourself: the difference does not lie so much in what is communicated—that can be judged in different ways—but one should pay attention to the fact that the whole way of integrating the whole world, the whole way of thinking, is different. This is formative, it gives complete images, it tries to give contours and, through contours, colors. You will be able to follow this throughout the entire presentation: it does not have the dissecting quality that all of today's science has. This difference in how must be emphasized just as much as the difference in what. So there is a formative way of thinking that is specially developed and has the purpose of leading into the supersensible worlds. If you take, for example, the book How to Know Higher Worlds, which outlines such a path into the supersensible worlds, you will find that everything that engages the thoughts and ideas is based on formative thinking.
This is something that is necessary for the present. For creative thinking has a very specific quality. If you think in a dissecting manner, if you think as today's natural scientists think, then you think in the same way as certain spirits of the Ahrimanic world, and therefore these Ahrimanic spirits can penetrate your soul. But if you take creative thinking, metamorphosed thinking, I could also say Goethean thinking, as it is represented, for example, in the design of our columns and capitals and so on, if you take this creative thinking, which is also taken into account in all the books I have tried to include in spiritual science, then this thinking is closely connected to the human being. No other beings except those connected with normal human development are capable of shaping things in the same way that human beings do with their thinking within themselves. That is what is unique about it. This means that you can never go astray if you engage in creative thinking through spiritual science. You can never lose yourself to the various spiritual beings that want to influence you. Of course, they pass right through your being. But as soon as you think creatively, as soon as you strive not merely to speculate and differentiate, but to think as this modern spiritual science really wants you to, you remain within yourself and cannot feel empty. That is why, from the standpoint of our spiritual science, we so often emphasize the Christ impulse, because the Christ impulse lies in the straight line of creative thinking. The Gospels cannot be understood by merely dissecting them. Modern Protestant theology has shown what comes of this. They dissect them, but they have also lost everything, and nothing remains. The cycles that deal with the Gospels follow the opposite path. They build something that is formed in order to advance toward an understanding of the old Gospels through these new formations. Today, it is actually necessary—and this is no exaggeration—for someone to do nothing other than adhere to the mode of imagination, to the way of thinking of this spiritual science, and then the demonic entities that roll in with the new wave as accompanying phenomena of the spirits of the personality will not be able to harm them. You can therefore see what great harm it does to humanity when it resists spiritual scientific thinking.
I said earlier: this wave cannot be stopped, even if people reject it; it floods in, even if people resist it, even if they do not want to accept it. Then what emerges is what has basically led to the catastrophe of the present in a deeper sense: the failure to recognize the spiritual world. That is the deeper cause of today's catastrophic events, and especially of today's catastrophic states of mind. And since this is a struggle that is raging below, there is no other means than to develop the human personality plastically within oneself through creative thinking and thereby experience the struggle in the soul. Otherwise, the struggle in the outer world will continue indefinitely. That is why we must say: it is truly wrong for people not to want to incline themselves toward this spiritual foundation of the present catastrophic world situation. For you will notice that there is something extraordinarily new in what has been said here; it is a reckoning with a new wave that is coming in and that is to be brought to people living in the present through a very special way of thinking. If one indulges in thoughts that follow the pattern of natural science, one simply cannot be equal to the present time. If you merely want to organize what is here in the physical world, if you merely think about what is here in the physical world and refuse to accept anything else, then you are only destroying. And you should not be surprised when the struggle that you do not want to master in the spiritual realm plays into physical life, for it strikes at the heart of human beings. And if they do not want to fight it out in their souls, it pits one against the other, peoples against peoples, people against people. What happens here in the physical world can only be a reflection of the spiritual world: Either people take up the struggle in such a way that they fight it out in their souls, that is, they deepen themselves spiritually, or else this struggle, which passes through consciousness like a sieve, if one wants to think in the way the present thinks, discharges itself by eliminating people, the human soul, in the outer world, and causes everything that you see right now. When you consider this, you will see that it is truly incumbent upon humanity today to turn toward the spirit, that this is necessarily predetermined by world events.
Let us consider such a time as is presented to us at the turn of the year, when we should look a little toward what is coming, which truly stands before us in a shocking perspective. You see, my dear friends, this is what must be achieved: that we do not numb ourselves by trying to sleep through the perspective of the future. For this reason, I presented to you yesterday the perspective of a person who calculates, who does not scatter things out of sympathy or antipathy, but who calculates them. I did this so that you could see what a calculating materialist arrives at in this day and age. Humanity is preparing itself for something quite different than really getting serious about recognizing the fact that, for the good of humanity, the spiritual world must be acknowledged. Anyone who understands the spiritual world and its relationship to the physical world knows that certain laws prevail, even if this is not a logical consequence, but the logical consequence lies precisely in dissecting, not in creative thinking, not in the intuitive thinking that I have characterized. You see, such laws do not operate externally in such a way that they exist in strict numerical form, but they are there. Take, for example, a law that naturally has exceptions: that — for the good of humanity — approximately as many men as women are born on earth. Purely theoretically speaking, it could happen, to the detriment of humanity, that in some century only one-twentieth of humanity would be men, and all the rest would be born women! Such laws, which cannot be explained by ordinary logic but can only be understood through spiritual science, do exist. But there is also this law: to the extent that people permeate their souls with recognition of the spiritual, as I have described today, so that what is spiritual in an age flows down into consciousness, to that extent can ordinary coexistence among human beings unfold, to that extent can human beings overcome their antisocial instincts, that which works against socialization.
People today simply do not have the courage to really let the spiritual play into their consciousness. But at least some people should know that it is a matter of allowing the spiritual to enter into their immediate consciousness today. Consider certain contemporary phenomena from this point of view, I would say contemporary fads, and you will see how people today have an urge to exclude from their consciousness the connection with the spiritual laws of existence. And I recently showed you how even in practical life we can expect to encounter things that exclude conscious connection, when I spoke about aptitude tests. There, people want to avoid as much as possible any direct, elementary connection with the student's talent, but instead test memory and comprehension through all kinds of external measures so that they do not have to think. That is why people like mathematics so much. First, a few rules are established, and then calculations are made mechanically. There is no need to pursue the details with intelligence. One could not do so anyway. You can probably imagine three, four, or five beans next to each other, maybe even ten beans, but imagining twenty at a glance is already difficult. But imagine you now have to imagine a thousand or even a million at a glance! But you can calculate it quite well because you do it mechanically; you don't need to use your intelligence to follow the details of what you are doing. But that is what people today love most of all, when you can prove something to them without them actually having to use their intelligence. If you demand that they follow all the individual stages of the proof, people find that terribly unpleasant. Therefore, it is better to prove the thing without the person being there. People would prefer to prove the thing, the spiritual world, in such a way that it reveals itself out there: spiritualism and the like. People find it terrible that spiritual science demands that one really be there, that one be active in the individual stages. Without this, however, spiritual science is inconceivable. That is why people love the symbols of ancient secret sciences and the like. They love rituals about which people say: They are performed before us, but we do not need to follow them with our intelligence, we do not need to form any idea of what is actually happening there — and so on. But this is something that modern spiritual science must have: this following of the individual.
It is very strange: in Eastern Europe we have something sprouting that is actually waiting for the next epoch. There, especially in the East, all kinds of things are being done that show how people want to permeate with intelligence that which should really only be encompassed by the network of intelligence. In the age of consciousness, where intelligence is supposed to work, where everything is supposed to be woven into the web of intelligence, people are seeking to bring intelligence into it. Take, for example, the way propaganda has been used in Russia to gradually bring about the fall of the tsarist regime over the last two decades! In this enslaved, oppressed Russia, it was of course impossible to conduct completely open propaganda. Anything that could in any way be distributed as propaganda would have been confiscated by the police. People were not allowed to speak either. Nevertheless, in a relatively short period of time, from 1900 to 1904, sixty million anti-tsarist writings appeared in Russia. Of these sixty million writings, only twenty to twenty-five percent were tracked down by the police; the rest got out, and monstrous things appeared in the period preceding the fall of the tsarist regime; a large part of the people were thus prepared for the fall of the tsarist regime. What is the reason why, despite the fact that everything that could be traced was carefully confiscated by the police, hardly a quarter of the sixty million pamphlets that worked toward the revolution and the overthrow of the tsarist regime were seized? This is because the leaders of the agitation came to a very specific conclusion, which is enormously important today, but which people are completely unwilling to accept. However, if one understands it in the Ahrimanic sense, as these leaders do, then one can have an enormously powerful effect. They have realized that something that is expressed in the same words has a completely different effect depending on whether it is presented to a policeman who thinks in strictly tsarist terms or to a person from the people. The same sentences, when spoken in the appropriate manner, have a docile effect on the policeman, but under certain circumstances they can have a terrible socialist effect on the people. Admittedly, they did not write texts such as those now being written in Switzerland, which are then confiscated, but they distributed books and pamphlets on botany and plants which, simply by the way they were written, prepared people's minds in the most eminent sense, so that Russia was truly ready for the revolution in 1917. It is immensely important to discover the secret behind why something you say has a completely different effect on one person than on another. Of course, this is being studied carefully, and the studies being done in this field are very characteristic of our time. They are actually something that is most opposed to what is coming into the world in the form of spiritual science. For example, I cannot imagine that there is anything that resists the actual primordial element of the spiritual more strongly than books such as those by Nikolai Rubakin, who attempts, in a completely new way, but in a way that is completely opposed to the vitality of spiritual science, to study the human soul in such a way that one captures, as it were, the intelligence as it works, but excludes the activity of intelligence in its workings. The striving of such a person counts on this: in our time, everything wants to happen intelligently, but one should not participate everywhere through the effort of subjective intelligence. That is why he has attempted the following in an enormously exaggerated way.
He organized the study of readers, of people who read something. He asks them to tell him what their favorite books are, what particularly affects them in these books, how these books have influenced them. And the questions he asks people are phrased in such a way that one does not expect them to express their likes and dislikes for the books, but rather that these are eliminated, so that only the objective workings of intelligence are taken into account. That is one way: he allows readers to dissect themselves so that, simply through the questions he asks, they tell him things that allow him to see deeper into their souls than they themselves do.
The other side is that, in thousands and thousands of cases, he again uses such clever questions to let the books analyze the people who appear in them. It doesn't matter whether the book is mathematical or botanical or political or socialist or anarchistic; that is less important, because it is the content that matters, and people don't pay attention to the fact that the content is only one part of it. But he allows us to determine how the book works through the beauty of its sentences or through the fact that the author reveals his temperament or writes boringly, i.e., through qualities that allow us to recognize the objectively prevailing intelligence that is now statistically determined in books. The whole approach is aimed at getting to know the intelligence at work within an era in its expression and reception. If such a science had been developed to a certain degree, it would be possible to write a book about Jupiter that would be a terribly revolutionary book, and on the other hand a book about the first right leg of the May beetle, and this would serve the same purpose as the other book about Jupiter. For it is really not a question of what one says, but of how one says it, because in this way one gets to know what is objectively at work in humanity as intelligence, but of which human beings are not aware. One does not now act only subjectively by not allowing one's own intelligence to participate, as in arithmetic, but one acts in what reigns as intelligence, but not in what this intelligence applies from person to person, but by completely eliminating subjective intelligence.
Today, one could found a university which, on the basis of such a science, would set itself the task of carrying out revolutionary propaganda simply by proceeding in the manner I have indicated to you. Such endeavors exist at present. They all actually aim at not bringing people into this intelligence in the age of intelligence, but rather at throwing them out of intelligence. It is the same thing that does not want people to consciously, with the consciousness that is already the consciousness of the present, take in the spiritual world. But this is necessary. And only this can bring salvation to humanity in the present and in the near future: to boldly and courageously surrender to the influence of the spiritual world. Neither by testing talent nor by statistically analyzing books and readers will we arrive at what wants to emerge from what is currently living in human beings; we must proceed differently. For what does all this amount to? To put it trivially, one could say that all these efforts, especially those of Rubakin and others, amount to the fact that human beings today actually want to get out of their own skin because they are forced to use their intelligence, but they want to apply it to spiritual life. Human beings want to get out of their skin, they don't want to live in their skin because they know that something alive is flowing in. But it is unpleasant for them to become acquainted with this living thing, so they want to get out. They want to objectify the intelligent being themselves, they want to get out and sit beside themselves so that this wave can pass through them. But that is precisely what spiritual science wants: a science that has not been decided within the skin, because one should not leave the skin in an unlawful way through experiments such as I have described. People already have this urge. But in reality, people should take in the knowledge that can be taken in through common sense. One does not always have to become bodiless oneself in order to acquire knowledge that acts in the world in such a way that the action is independent of what one accomplishes with the sphere of influence of the body. That is the task of truth, and the rest are caricatures of truth. But these caricatures of the actual spiritual task in the present are what cause the calamities of our time and lead us into dead ends.
If one looks in this way at what is prevailing in our time, one knows where it comes from that people who do not want to recognize the actual spirit, but who, if they are honest, cannot bring themselves to numb themselves, realize what lies ahead for humanity if it wants to remain with materialism. And one must realize that turning toward the spirit does not in any way make it necessary to become pessimistic. When one realizes how little people today are inclined to enter into the spiritual world as spiritual science demands, then one already sees where the deeper causes of the decline of our time lie.
All kinds of Christmas articles have appeared again in recent years. One would not believe that, given the seriousness of the times, such stuff could appear as it has now appeared again in many cases. People write terribly well, they write terribly nicely, they write about how people should love one another. They hate each other as they have never hated before, but they write about how one should love one another, how one should love one's enemies, and so on. In short, they write like the lady who wrote the “Letters of a Woman to Walther Rathenau.” They write in such a way that, intellectually speaking, the ideas underlying their writing take on a very peculiar form. People write about love for humanity, about Christianity, about all sorts of things. What they write is very beautiful, and the people who read it also find it beautiful. And yet it is nothing more than worn-out conceptual coinage that keeps rolling around in the head or in the heart. And as it rolls around, the writer or the reader stands behind it, and then it has the effect of a carrot on a stick when one indulges voluptuously in the love of such words. It is so nice to dream when you say: Christ spoke of love for one's neighbor, Christianity must flourish again — and so on. There is no need to engage with the concrete spiritual world from the depths of your soul, with your whole being, as spiritual science demands. But it is precisely this that is important, that one does something with these things. If these things are accepted in theory, and then people do nothing else but worship Wilsonianism or fall into national chauvinism and talk the way people talk today, then this catastrophic time will continue. And it will remain so until people allow themselves to truly accept the spiritual world as it must be accepted today: with awareness, concretely, without fear and without hesitation.
So that when we look into the new world year, we see, on the one hand, people engaging in prophetic politics and founding leagues of nations that are supposed to eliminate war from the world, just to numb themselves. Of course, despite boasting that there will be no new “Congress of Vienna,” people today are already beginning to say that they would be happy if the Congress of Versailles brought as many months of peace as the Congress of Vienna brought years of peace. Well, people like thoughts that numb them! The main thought that numbs humanity today is that now, after a few others have been cut down, Wilson is the right man for the future. He is the great man, isn't he? A man who believes that fourteen abstract ideas are capable of transforming the world of earthly existence into a paradise! But it is convenient, it is what can numb you. And it is more inconvenient to say to yourself: if we are not to face a future like the one Rathenau envisioned, it is necessary that as many people as possible come to a conscious recognition of the spiritual world. One would like to achieve this in at least some souls, after allowing oneself to be moved by such New Year's Eve feelings as we allowed to pass through our souls yesterday: that the truth of these New Year's Eve feelings be experienced in the souls in such a way that they say to themselves: If we stick to what humanity has become accustomed to in its thinking, and what truly prevails not among one people but among all peoples across the globe, then Rathenau's perspective is correct. — It does not need to be correct! It is within the realm of human possibility that this perspective does not need to be correct. This may be the New Year's reflection, that one allows the will to prevail that this perspective is not correct. To do this, however, it is necessary to separate oneself from all the prejudices that one still harbors today, by bringing out the most ancient things again in order to indulge in them, and to engage much more with what is truly new.
Those who understand this will know where to look for the spirit, and there will be hope for salvation in the future. Wherever one does not look for the spirit, whether one is victorious or defeated, there will be no salvation in the future! May the people of one part of the world demand this of the other billions; these billions will become red-hot gold and have a destructive effect, while on the other side poverty, if inspired by the spirit, will carry people up to the heights to which the future of human development is leading.
But this must be felt from inner insight into the course of the spirit. And no looking to anything external, no swearing allegiance to new idols, as is now being prepared, can save humanity, but only holding fast to the spirit, holding fast to the spirit, working in the spirit.