Karmic Relationships IV
GA 238
16 September 1924, Dornach
Lecture VI
To-day I wish to continue with the subject I placed before you the day before yesterday. We were tracing the thread of evolution which enters into the spiritual life of the present time, and we left off with the individuality of Julian the Apostate. I told you that this individuality was next incarnated in one who is only known by legendary accounts, whose secret is contained in the Parsifal legend, in the name of Herzeleide. In this life as Herzeleide, the soul of Julian the Apostate entered into a far deeper inner life. The soul-life of the individuality was deepened, as was indeed necessary after the many storms and inner moods of opposition which he had undergone in his life as Julian the Apostate.
But this later life of which I told you—this life as Herzeleide—spread itself out over the former life as Julian the Apostate like a warm embalming cloud. Thus the soul grew more intense and deep and inward, and grew richer, too, in manifold impulses of the inner life.
Now this soul was among those who had carried over something of the ancient Mysteries. Julian had lived within the substance of the ancient Mysteries at a time when their light was still radiant in many ways. Thus he had received into himself much spirituality of the cosmos. All this had been as it were pressed back during the incarnation as Herzeleide; but it was none the less pressing forth in the soul, and thus we find the same individuality again in the 16th century; we find arising in him once more, in a Christianised form, what he had undergone as Julian the Apostate. For the same individuality reappears in the 16th century as Tycho de Brahe, and stands face to face with the Copernican world-conception which emerges within Western civilisation at that time.
The Copernican world-conception pictures the universe in a way, which if followed to its logical conclusions would tend to drive all spirituality out of the cosmos in man's conception of it. The Copernican world-picture leads at length to a mechanical, machine-like conception of the universe in space. It was after all in view of this Copernican picture of the world that the famous astronomer said to Napoleon: he had searched through all the universe and he could find no God. It is, indeed, an entire elimination of spirituality.
The individuality of whom I am now speaking, who had now returned as Tycho de Brahe, could not submit to this. Thus we see Tycho de Brahe accepting in his world-conception what is useful of Copernicanism, but rejecting the absolute movement of the earth ascribed to it according to the Copernican world-picture. In Tycho de Brahe we see these things united with true spirituality. When we consider the course of his life, it is indeed evident how a karma from ancient time is pressing its way forth with might and main into this life as Tycho de Brahe, seeking to enter the substance of his consciousness. Such is his spirituality. We remember how his Danish relatives sought to hold him fast at all costs in the profession of a lawyer, and we see how, living as a tutor, he steals the hours by night in which to commune with the gods. And here an extraordinary thing appears. All this is contained in his biography. We shall see presently how deeply significant it is for a true estimate of this individuality of Tycho de Brahe—Julian—Herzeleide. With the most primitive instruments contrived and manufactured by himself, he discovers considerable errors in calculation which had entered into the determination of the orbits of Saturn and Jupiter. We have this remarkable scene in the life of Tycho de Brahe. As a young man with the most primitive instruments with which other people would not dream of trying to accomplish anything, he feels impelled one day to seek the exact places of Saturn and Jupiter in the heavens. In his case all these things are strongly permeated with spiritual content. And this spiritual content leads him to a conception of the universe such as we must have if we are striving once again to the modern science of Initiation, when at length we come to speak of spiritual beings as we speak of physical men on earth. For in reality we can ever meet them, and there is in fact only a difference in quality of being as between those individualities who are now on the physical plane and those who are discarnate, living between death and a new birth.
These things kindled in Tycho de Brahe an extraordinarily deep and penetrating vision of spiritual connections. I mean the connections which appear when we no longer regard everything on earth as though it were caused by earthly impulses alone, and on the other hand consider the stars only in mathematical calculations, but when we perceive the interplay of impulses from the stars with the historic impulses within mankind. In Tycho de Brahe's soul there lived instinctively what he had brought with him from his life as Julian the Apostate. In that former life it had not been permeated with rationalism or intellectualism. It had been intuitive, imaginative—for such was the inner life of Julian the Apostate. With all this he succeeded in doing something that made a great sensation.
He could make little impression on his contemporaries with his astronomic opinions, differing as they did from Copernicus, or with his other astronomical achievements. He observed countless stars and made a map of the heavens which alone made it possible for Kepler afterwards to reach his great results. For it was on the basis of Tycho de Brahe's mapping of the stars that Kepler discovered his famous laws. But none of these things could have made so great an impression on his contemporaries as a discovery relatively unimportant in itself, but very striking. He foretold almost to the day the death of the Sultan Soliman, which afterwards occurred as he had foretold it. Here we see ancient perceptions working into a later time in a spiritual intellectuality. Perceptions which Julian the Apostate had received light up again in modern time in Tycho de Brahe. Tycho de Brahe is indeed one of the most interesting of human souls. In the 17th century he passed on through the gate of death and entered the spiritual world. Now in the spiritual currents which I have described as those of Michael, this being, Tycho de Brahe—Julian the Apostate—Herzeleide, constantly emerges. In one or another of the super-sensible functions he is in fact always there. Hence too we find him in those great events in the super-sensible world at the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th century which are connected with this stream of Michael.
I told you already of the great super-sensible School of instruction in the 15th, 16th centuries which stood under the aegis of Michael himself. Then there began for those who had been within this School a life which took its course in such a way that activities and forces unfolded in the spiritual world worked down into the physical, worked in connection with the physical world. For example, in the time that immediately followed the period of the super-sensible School of Michael, an important task was allotted to an individuality of whose continued life I have often spoken—I mean the individuality of Alexander the Great.
I have already spoken, here at Dornach too, of Lord Bacon of Verulam as the reincarnated Haroun al Raschid. We know how intense and determining an influence Bacon's conceptions had on the whole succeeding evolution of the spiritual life, notably in its finer impulses and movements. Now the remarkable thing is this, that in Lord Bacon himself something took place which we may describe as a morbid elimination of old spirituality. For such spirituality he had after all possessed when he was Haroun al Raschid.
And thus we see, proceeding from the impulse of Lord Bacon, a whole world of daemonic beings. The world was literally filled supersensibly and sensibly with daemonic beings. (When I say “sensibly” I meant not, of course, visibly, but within the world of sense.)
Now it chiefly fell to the individuality of Alexander to wage war against these daemonic idols of Lord Bacon, Francis Bacon of Verulam. And similar activities, exceedingly important ones, were taking place on earth below. For otherwise the materialism of the 19th century would have broken in upon the world in a far more devastating way even than it did. Similar activities, taking place in the spiritual and in the physical world together, were allotted to the stream of Michael, until at length at the end of the 18th and the beginning of the 19th century there took place in super-sensible regions what I have already described as the enactment of a great and sublime super-sensible ritual and ceremony.
In the super-sensible world at that time a cult was instituted and enacted in real imaginations of a spiritual kind. Thus we may say: At the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th century there hovers in the immediate neighbourhood of the physical world of sense a great super-sensible event, consisting in super-sensible acts of ritual, an unfolding of mighty pictures of the spiritual life of beings of the universe, the Beings of the Hierarchies in connection with the great ether-workings of the universe and the human workings upon earth. I say“in the immediate neighbourhood,” meaning of course, adjoining this physical world in a qualitative, not in a spatial sense. It is interesting to see how at a most favourable moment a little miniature picture of this super-sensible cult and action flowed into Goethe's spirit. Transformed and changed and in miniature we have this picture set down by Goethe in his fairy story of the Green Snake and the Beautiful Lily ...
There was, then, a great super-sensible action in which those above all took part who had partaken in the stream of Michael, in all the revelations super-sensible and sensible, of which I told you. Now here again and again the individuality who was last present upon earth in Tycho de Brahe, plays a very great part. And it was his constant striving to preserve the great and lasting impulses of what we call paganism, of the old life of the Mysteries. It was his striving to preserve it in effect towards a better understanding of Christianity. He had entered Christianity when he lived as the soul of Herzeleide. Now it was his striving to introduce into the Christian conception all that he had received through his Initiation as Julian the Apostate. For it was this especially which seemed so important to the souls of whom I have spoken. The many souls who are now to be found in the Anthroposophical Movement or strive towards this Movement with sincerity are united with all these spiritual streams. By its very essence and nature they feel themselves attracted by the School of Michael, and Tycho de Brahe had a great influence in this. At the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century, especially at the end of the 19th century, these souls have descended to the earth, prepared not only to feel the Christ as He is felt in the various Confessions, but to feel Him and behold Him as the Cosmic Christ in His universal majesty and glory. The souls were prepared for this even supersensibly, between death and the new birth. They were prepared by such influences as that of Tycho de Brahe, of the soul who was last incarnated in Tycho de Brahe.
This individuality therefore played an extraordinarily important part continuously within the stream of Michael.
You see, the souls were constantly looking towards the approaching dominion of Michael. They were looking towards it in the old super-sensible School of the 15th and 16th centuries, and they were looking towards it again during the enactment of that super-sensible ceremony which was to introduce and, as it were, to consecrate from the spiritual worlds the subsequent Michael dominion upon earth. Now as I have already indicated, a large number of Platonically gifted souls have remained in the spiritual worlds since the time they worked in Chartres. (I have placed here for your inspection to-day other pictures of the series from Chartres which I received. They are pictures of the Prophets and also of the wonderful architecture of Chartres.) The individualities of the teachers of Chartres, who were of a Platonic tendency, remained in the spiritual world. It was more the Aristotelians who descended to the earth, finding their way largely into the Dominican Order. Then, after a certain time, they united again with the Platonists in the spiritual world and went on working together with them supersensibly, from the spiritual world. Thus we may say: the souls of Platonic character have remained behind. They have not appeared again on earth, not at any rate the more important individualities among them. They are waiting till the end of this century. But on the other hand, many who felt themselves drawn to what I have described as the Michael deeds in the super-sensible, have come down and entered the stream of the Anthroposophical Movement inasmuch as they have felt sincerely drawn on earth to such a spiritual Movement.
We may say in truth: what lives in Anthroposophy was kindled first by the Michael School of instruction in the 15th, 16th centuries, and by the great religious act that took place in the super-sensible at the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th century. It was in vision of that super-sensible action that my Mystery Plays came into being, and for this reason the first Mystery Play, different as it is from Goethe's fairy story of the Green Snake and the Beautiful Lily, nevertheless reveals distinctly similar features. For a thing that would contain real impulses of a spiritual kind cannot be arbitrarily conceived. It must be seen and worked out in harmony with the spiritual world.
Thus we stand here within the Anthroposophical Movement to-day, having entered into the dominion of Michael which has now begun. We stand here in this Movement, called to understand the essence of this reign of Michael, called to work in the spirit of his working through the centuries and the thousands of years. At this moment of great significance he has begun his earthly rulership once more and we are called to work in his direction. Such is the inner esoteric impulse of this stream of Michael, whose working to begin with for this century, is very clearly foreshadowed.
But you must see that if we take Anthroposophy in its present content and trace it backward, we find little preparation for it upon earth. Go back just a little way from what appears as Anthroposophy and try to find its sources in the course of the 19th century, for instance. If you do so open-mindedly, if your vision is not clouded by all manner of philological contrivances, you will not find the sources. You will find isolated traces of a spiritual conception which it was always possible to use like little germinating seeds, though very sparingly, within the great texture of Anthroposophy. But you will find no real preparation for it within the earthly sphere.
All the greater was the preparation in the super-sensible. You are well aware how Goethe's working (even after his death, though in my books it may not seem so) contributed to the forming and shaping of Anthroposophy. It is indeed true that the most important things in this respect took place within the super-sensible. Nevertheless we can trace the spiritual life of the 19th century backward in a living way till we come to Goethe, Herder, and others, nay even to Lessing. And we find after all that what was working in isolated spirits of the end of the 18th and first half of the 19th century was, to say the least of it, imbued with a strong spiritual atmosphere, even if it appeared in great abstractions as in Hegel, or in abstract pictures as in the case of Schelling.
You may read in my Riddles of Philosophy how I described Schelling and Hegel. I think you will recognise that I was seeking to point to something of the soul and spirit in this evolution of world-conceptions which could then enter into the Anthroposophical stream. In the book Riddles of Philosophy, I tried indeed to take hold of those abstractions of the philosophers with full heart and mind. Perhaps I may specially draw your attention to the chapter on Hegel, and to the things I said of Schelling.
But we must go still deeper to perceive the origin of certain remarkable phenomena that appeared in the spiritual life of the first half of the 19th century. They were lost sight of, they were obliterated in what then came forth as the materialistic spiritual life of the second half of the century. Nevertheless, in however abstract conceptions, there did appear something that contained a hidden spiritual life and being.
Most interesting, and increasingly so the more one enters into him, is the philosopher Schelling. He begins almost like Fichte, with pure, clear-cut ideas, saturated through and through with will. For such was Fichte. Johann Gottlieb Fichte was one of the few figures of world-history—indeed in a certain respect he is perhaps unique—who combined the greatest conceptual abstractions with enthusiasm and energy of will. He is an extraordinarily interesting figure. Short and thick-set, under-grown a little owing to the privations of his youth, one would see him marching along the street with extraordinary firmness of step. He was all will, and will and will again, and his will lived itself out in the description of the most abstract concepts. And yet with these most abstract concepts he could achieve such a thing, for instance, as his Addresses to the German Nation, with which he inspired countless people most wonderfully.
Schelling appears in an almost Fichte-like way, not with the same power, but with a similar way of thought. But we very soon see Schelling's spirit expand. In his youth he speaks like Fichte of the“I” and the “Not I” and other such abstractions and inspires the people of Jena with these things. But he soon departs from them. His spirit grows and widens and we see entering into him conceptions, albeit fanciful, which nevertheless tend almost to spiritual imaginations. Thus he goes on for a while. Then he enters deeply into such spirits as Jacob Boehme, and writes something altogether different in style and tone from his former works. He writes The Foundations of Human Freedom—which is a kind of resurrection of the ideas of Jacob Boehme.
Then we see almost a kind of Platonism springing up in Schelling's soul. He writes a philosophic dialogue entitled Bruno which is truly reminiscent of Plato's Dialogues, and deeply penetrating. Interesting too is another short work Klara, wherein the super-sensible world plays a great part. Then for a very long time Schelling is silent. His fellow philosophers begin to look on him, if I may put it so, almost as a living dead man. He published only his extraordinarily deep and significant work on the Samothracian Mysteries, once again an expansion of his spirit; but he lives on in simple retirement at Munich, until at length the King of Prussia summons him to lecture on philosophy at the University of Berlin. And of the philosophy he now proclaimed Schelling said that he had gained it in the silence of his retirement through the course of decades.
Now, therefore, Schelling appeared in Berlin, proclaiming that philosophy which was afterwards included in his posthumous works as the Philosophy of Mythology, and the Philosophy of Revelation. He made no great impression on the Berlin public, for the whole tenor of his lectures in Berlin was really this: Man, however much he thinks and ponders, can attain nothing in the sphere of world-conceptions; something must enter his soul, inspiring and imbuing his thought with life as a real, spiritual world.
Suddenly, in place of the old rationalistic philosophy there appears in Schelling a real awakening of the ancient philosophy of the gods of mythology, a reawakening of the old gods in a very modern way, and yet with old spirituality quite evidently working in it. All this is very strange. And in his Philosophy of Revelation he evolves ideas of Christianity which do contain, in however abstract a form, important inspirations and suggestions for what must afterwards be said by Anthroposophy, directly out of spiritual vision, on many points of Christianity.
Schelling is most certainly not to be passed over in the easygoing way of the Berlin people. Indeed he cannot be passed over at all, but the Berlin folk passed him over quite easily. When one of his descendants got engaged to the daughter of a Prussian minister (an external, but at any rate a karmically connected event) a Prussian functionary who heard of it remarked:“I never knew before why Schelling ever came to Berlin. Now I know.”
Nevertheless one can well come into inner difficulties and conflicts in following Schelling thus through his career. Moreover the last period in his life, dreadfully as it is generally treated in the histories of philosophy, is always dealt with in a chapter by itself, under the title: Schelling's Theosophy.
I myself again and again returned to Schelling. For me a certain warmth always proceeded from what lives in him, in spite of the abstract form. Thus at a comparatively early age I entered deeply into the above-mentioned philosophic dialogue, Bruno, or On the Divine and Natural Principle of Things.
Since the year 1854, Schelling was in the spiritual world again. And he came especially near to one through this dialogue, Bruno, if one entered into it, and lived through it, also through his Klara, and notably through his essay on the Samothracian Mysteries. One could easily come really near to him in spirit.
And at length, as early as the beginning of the eighteen nineties, it became fully clear to me: However it may have been with the other personalities who worked in the sphere of philosophy during the first half of the 19th century, in Schelling's case it is absolutely clear that a spiritual inspiration did really enter in. Spiritual inspiration worked and entered into his work continually.
Thus one might attain the following picture.—To begin with, down in the physical world, one could see Schelling, as he passed through the manifold vicissitudes of life, through a long period, as I said above, of loneliness and isolation, treated in the most varying way by his fellow men, now with immense enthusiasm, and now again with scorn and derision; Schelling, who really always made a significant impression whenever he appeared again in public—the short, thick-set man, with the immensely impressive head, and eyes which even in extreme old age were sparkling with fire, for from his eyes there spoke the fire of Truth, the fire of Knowledge. And this Schelling whom one can distinctly see—the more so, the more one enters into him—had certain moments when inspiration poured into him from above.
Most clear and visible it became to me when I read Robert Zimmermann's review of Schelling's book on the Ages of the World. From Zimmermann, as you know, is derived the word Anthroposophy, though his Anthroposophy is a tangled undergrowth of abstract concepts. I had the very greatest regard for him, and yet, when I read this review, I could not help breaking out into the sigh—“Pedant that you are!”
Then I returned to the book itself, Schelling's Ages of the World, which is indeed somewhat abstractly written, but in which one may clearly recognise something like a description of ancient Atlantis—quite a spiritual description, containing spiritual realities, however much distorted by abstractions.
Thus you see in Schelling's case again and again there is something working in from higher worlds, so that we must say: Down there is Schelling, but in the higher worlds something is taking place which influences him from above. In Schelling's case what is a general truth becomes most visible, namely that in spiritual evolution there is a perpetual interplay of the spiritual world above with the earthly world below. And once in the eighteen nineties I was most intensely concerned in finding the spiritual foundations of the age of Michael and of other things.
At that time I myself was entering a phase of life in which I could not but experience intensely the world immediately adjoining our physical world of sense. I could only hint at these things in my autobiography, but I have hinted at them there. That adjoining world is separated, if I may so describe it, only by a thin wall from the physical, and in it the most gigantic facts are happening, nor are they at all powerfully separated from our world. It was at the time when I was in Weimar. On the one hand I entered most intensively into the social life of Weimar in all directions; but at the same time I felt the inner necessity to withdraw into myself. These two sides of my life went parallel with one another. And at that time, in the very highest degree, it happened that my experience of the spiritual world was always more intense and strong than my experience of the physical. Already as a young man I had no great difficulty in quickly comprehending any philosophy or world-conception that came into my sphere. But a plant or a stone, if I had to recognise it again, I had to look at, not three or four times, but fifty or sixty times. I could not easily unite my soul with that which in the physical world is named by physical means. And this had reached its highest point during my Weimar period.
It was long, long before the Republican Constituent Assembly took place in Weimar, and at that time Weimar was really like a spiritual oasis, quite different from any other place in Germany. In that Weimar, as I said in my autobiography, I did indeed experience intense moments of loneliness. And once again—it was in 1897—wishing to investigate certain matters, I put my hand on Schelling's Divinities of Samothrace, and his Philosophy of Mythology, simply to receive a stimulation, not in order to study in the books. (Just as one who researches in the spiritual world, if for instance, he wishes to make researches on the periods of the first Christian centres, in order to facilitate matters may lay the writings of St. Augustine or of Clement of Alexandria under his head for a few minutes in succession. You must not laugh about these things. They are simply external methods to assist one, external technicalities that are not directly connected with the real thing itself. They are an external stimulation, like any technical mnemonic.) Thus at that time I took into my hand Schelling's Divinities of Samothrace, and his Philosophy of Mythology. But the real subject of my study at that moment was that which was taking place spiritually in the course of the 19th century, and which afterwards poured down so as to become Anthroposophy.
And at that moment, when I was really able to trace Schelling's life, his biography, his evolution through his life, it was revealed to me—not yet quite clearly, for these things only became clear at a far later date, when I wrote my Riddles of Philosophy—it was revealed to me, I could already perceive, although not quite clearly, how much of Schelling's writing was written down by him under inspiration, and that that inspiring figure was Julian the Apostate—Herzeleide—Tycho Brahe. He has not appeared again himself on the physical plane, but he worked with tremendous strength through the soul of Schelling. Then I became aware how greatly Tycho Brahe had progressed in his life as Tycho Brahe. Through Schelling's bodily nature little could penetrate; but once we know how the individuality of Tycho Brahe hovered over him as an inspirer, we read the lightning-flashes of genius in the Divinities of Samothrace quite differently. We read the flashes of genius above all in the Philosophy of Revelation, and in Schelling's interpretation of the ancient Mysteries, which is, after all, magnificent of its kind. And especially if we enter deeply enough into the curious language he uses in these passages, then presently we hear, no longer the voice of Schelling but the voice of Tycho Brahe! Then indeed we become aware how, among other spirits, this Tycho Brahe, especially the individuality who was in Julian the Apostate, played a great part, and contributed many things. For by his genius many a thing arose in the spiritual life of modern time which worked in turn as a stimulus, and whence we were to borrow at least the external form and expression for the spirit and teachings of Anthroposophy.
Another of the writings of German philosophers which made a great impression on me was Jakob Froschhammer's book, Die Phantasie als Welt-Prinzip, a brilliant book at the end of the 19th century, brilliant because this courageous man, having been driven from the Church, and his writings placed in the Index, was no less courageous in the face of science, for he revealed the kinship of the creative principle of fancy working purely in the soul when man creates artistically, with the force that works within as the force of life and growth. In that time it was indeed an achievement. Froschhammer's book on fancy or imagination as a world-principle, as a world-creative power, is indeed a work of great importance.
Thus I was greatly interested in this man, Jakob Froschhammer. Once more I tried to get at him in a real sense, not only through his writings, and once again I found that the inspiring spirit was the same who had lived in Tycho Brahe and in Julian the Apostate. And so it was in a whole number of personalities in whose working we can see a certain preparation for what then came forth as Anthroposophy.
But in each case we need the spiritual light behind, the light which works within the super-sensible. For what came to earth before remained, after all, in a world of abstraction. It is only now and then, in a spirit such as Schelling, or in a man of courage like Jakob Froschhammer, that the abstractions suddenly grow concrete.
And to-day, my dear friends, we may look up to what is working there in spiritual realms, and we may know how Anthroposophy stands in relation to it. And well we know how we are being helped by that which we perceive when we extend our spiritual research into the detailed realities of spiritual life in the course of history. Well may we know it. Here upon earth, striving honestly towards Anthroposophy, there are numbers of souls who have always stood near to the stream of Michael. Added to these, in the super-sensible world, are numbers of souls who have remained behind, among them the teachers of Chartres. And between those who are here in the world of sense, and those who are above in the spiritual world, there is a decided tendency to unite their work with one another.
And now if we would find a great helper for those things which we must investigate for the future of the 20th century, if we would find one who can advise us in relation to the super-sensible world, if we need impulses that are there within that world, it is the individuality of Julian the Apostate—Tycho Brahe who can help us. He is not on the physical plane to-day; but in reality he is always there, always ready to give information on those matters especially which concern the prophetic future of the 20th century.
Taking all these things together it does indeed emerge that those who receive Anthroposophy in a sincere way at the present time are preparing their souls to shorten as far as possible the life between death and a new birth, and to appear again at the end of the 20th century, united with the teachers of Chartres who have remained behind.
We should receive into our souls this consciousness: That the Anthroposophical Movement is called to work on and on, and to appear again not only in its most important, but in nearly all its souls, at the end of the 20th century. For then the great impulse will be given for a spiritual life on earth, without which earthly civilisation would finally be drawn into that decadence, the character of which is only too apparent.
Out of such foundations, I would fain kindle in your hearts something of the flames that we require, so that already now within the Anthroposophical Movement we may absorb the spiritual life strongly enough to appear again properly prepared. For in that great epoch after shortened life in spiritual worlds we shall work again on earth—in the epoch when for the salvation of the earth the spiritual Powers are reckoning in their most important members, in their most important features, on what Anthroposophists can do.
I think the vision of this perspective of the future may stir the hearts of Anthroposophists to call forth within themselves the feelings which will carry them in a right way, with energy and strength of action and with the beauty of enthusiasm, through the present earthly life; for then this earthly life will be a preparation for the work at the end of the century when Anthroposophy will be called upon to play its part.
Sechster Vortrag
[ 1 ] Ich möchte in der Betrachtung, die ich vorgestern hier angestellt habe, heute fortfahren. Und zwar standen wir da, wo wir den Faden der Entwickelung, wie er hereinspielt in das spirituelle Leben der Gegenwart, fallengelassen haben mit der Individualität Julian Apostatas respektive der Individualität, die in Julian Apostata gelebt hat und von der ich Ihnen angedeutet habe, daß sie zunächst in derjenigen Persönlichkeit verkörpert war, von der nur legendäre Nachrichten da sind, von der Persönlichkeit, die in die ParsifalSage hineingeheimnißt ist als Herzeloyde. Es war ein vertieftes Seelenleben, das da in die Seele des frühern Julian Apostata einzog, ein vertieftes Seelenleben, das diese Individualität wahrhaftig brauchte, brauchte gegenüber den Stürmen und den inneren Oppositionsstimmungen, welche sie eben in dem Dasein als Julian Apostata durchgemacht hatte. Dieses Leben, von dem ich Ihnen sprach, war ein solches, das sich über das Julian-Apostata-Leben wie eine friedfertige, warme Wolke herüberzog. Und so ist die Seele innerlich intensiver geworden. So ist die Seele reicher auch geworren, reicher an den mannigfaltigsten inneren Impulsen.
[ 2 ] Aber diese Seele hatte ja, weil sie zu denjenigen gehörte, die noch etwas von den alten Mysterien übernommen hatten, die noch drinnen gelebt hatten in der Substanz der alten Mysterien in einer Zeit, wo diese Mysterien in gewisser Beziehung helleuchtend noch waren, diese Seele hatte von der Spiritualität des Kosmos viel in sich aufgenommen. Das war gewissermaßen zurückgedrängt worden während der Herzeloyde-Inkarnation, drängte aber herauf in der Seele, und so finden wir diese Individualität wieder im sechzehnten Jahrhunderte. Und wir erkennen im sechzehnten Jahrhunderte bei dieser Individualität, wie aufsteigt verchristlicht dasjenige, was sie als Julian Apostata durchgemacht hatte. Es erscheint diese Individualität als Tycho de Brahe im sechzehnten Jahrhunderte und steht da gegenüber demjenigen, was in der abendländischen Zivilisation als die kopernikanische Weltanschauung herauftaucht.
[ 3 ] Diese kopernikanische Weltanschauung, sie gab ein Bild von dem Weltenall, das nun ganz darauf hinarbeitet, wenn es in seinen letzten Konsequenzen verfolgt wird, Spiritualität aus dem Kosmos in der Anschauung herauszutreiben. Das kopernikanische Weltbild führt zuletzt zu einer völlig mechanisch-maschinellen Auffassung des Weltalls im Raume. Und schließlich ist es ja dieses kopernikanische Weltbild, aus dem heraus ein berühmter Astronom zu Napoleon gesagt hat, er fände keinen Gott innerhalb dieses Weltenalls; er hätte alles durchforscht, er fände keinen Gott. Es ist eben das Austreiben aller Spiritualität.
[ 4 ] Dem konnte sich die charakterisierte Individualität, die jetzt in Tycho de Brahe da war, nicht fügen. Daher sehen wir, wie Tycho de Brahe in bezug auf seine Weltanschauung dasjenige annimmt, was brauchbar ist im Kopernikanismus, wie er aber ablehnt die absolute Bewegung, die der Erde zugeschrieben werden mußte im Sinne des kopernikanischen Weltbildes. Und wir sehen dies gebunden bei Tycho de Brahe an wirkliche Spiritualität, Spiritualität, bei der wir, wenn wir den Verlauf seines Lebens ins Auge fassen, geradezu sehen können, wie altes Karma hinaufdrängt in das Tycho-de-Brahe-Leben, mit aller Gewalt heraufdrängt, Bewußtseinsinhalt werden will. So wird ja von seinen dänischen Angehörigen in jeder Weise versucht, ihn im juristischen Berufe festzuhalten; er muß unter der Aufsicht eines Hauslehrers in Leipzig Jurisprudenz studieren und kann nur, während jener schläft, sich die Stunden aussparen, in denen er in der Nacht mit den Göttern verkehrt. Und da zeigt sich — das ist ja auch in seiner Biographie wiederum enthalten — etwas höchst Merkwürdiges.
[ 5 ] Sie werden sehen, daß dies für die spätere Beurteilung der Tycho de Brahe-Herzeloyde-Julian-Individualität von Bedeutung ist. Schon mit sehr primitiven Instrumenten, die er sich selber zusammengestellt hat, entdeckt er bedeutende Rechenfehler, die gemacht worden sind in bezug auf die Ortsbestimmungen von Saturn und Jupiter. Und wir haben die merkwürdige Szene im Leben Tycho de Brahes, daß er als junger Mensch mit primitiven Instrumenten, mit denen man sonst gar nicht daran denkt, irgendwie etwas anfangen zu können, eines Tages sich gedrängt fühlt, die genauen Orte am Himmel für Saturn und Jupiter aufzusuchen. Solche Dinge werden dann bei ihm durchaus mit Spirituellem durchsetzt, mit Spirituellem, das ihn so hineinführt in eine Auffassung des Weltalls, wie man sie eigentlich haben muß, wenn man wiederum dem modernen Initiatentum zustrebt, wo man dann dazu kommt, von geistigen Wesen so zu sprechen, wie man von physischen Menschen auf Erden spricht, weil man ihnen ja eigentlich immer begegnen kann, weil ja im Grunde genommen nur ein Seins-Unterschied, ein Unterschied in der Qualität des Seins ist zwischen denjenigen Menschenindividualitäten, die gerade hier auf dem physischen Plane verweilen, und denjenigen, die entkörpert sind und zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt leben.
[ 6 ] Das aber fachte in Tycho de Brahe überhaupt ein ungemein bedeutsames Hineinschauen in jene Zusammenhänge an, die sich ergeben, wenn man nicht mehr hier auf Erden alles wie durch irdische Impulse veranlaßt anschaut und dies oben in den Sternen nur mathematisch berechnet, sondern wenn man das Ineinanderwirken von Sternenimpulsen und menschheitlichen geschichtlichen Impulsen durchschaut. Durch jenes Instinktive in der Seele, das er sich aus seinem Julian-Apostata-Leben mitgebracht hatte, das damals während des Julian-Apostata-Lebens nicht durchsetzt war von Rationalismus oder Intellektualismus, sondern das intuitiv, imaginativ war — so war ja das innere Leben Julian Apostatas —, durch all das gelang es ihm dann, etwas sehr Aufsehenerregendes zu tun.
[ 7 ] Er konnte nicht viel Eindruck auf seine Zeitgenossen machen mit seinen von dem Kopernikus ja abweichenden astronomischen Ansichten, mit dem, was er sonst in der Sternkunde leistete. Er beobachtete unzählige Sterne und zeichnete eine Sternkarte, die es dann allein möglich machte, daß Kepler zu seinen großartigen Ergebnissen kam. Denn Kepler kam auf Grundlage der Sternkarte des Tycho de Brahe zu seinen Keplerschen Gesetzen. Das alles aber hätte auf seine Zeitgenossen wohl nicht den großen Eindruck gemacht, den eine an sich nicht gerade bedeutsame, aber auffällige Sache machte: Er sagte nämlich den Tod des Sultans Soliman fast bis auf den Tag genau prophetisch voraus, der dann auch so eintraf, wie er ihn vorausgesagt hatte. Wir sehen ja wirklich in Tycho de Brahe hereinwirken in eine neuere Zeit, verbunden mit einer spirituellen Intellektualität, möchte ich sagen, alte Anschauungen, die er als Julian Apostata aufgenommen hatte. Wir sehen das alles hereinwirken in die neuere Zeit in diesem Tycho de Brahe. Und Tycho de Brahe gehört schon zu den interessantesten Seelen, die dann, als er im siebzehnten Jahrhunderte durch die Todespforte ging, in die geistige Welt hinaufversetzt wurde.
[ 8 ] Nun, in den Strömungen, die ich als Michael-Strömungen geschildert habe, findet sich eigentlich Tycho de Brahe-Julian-ApostataHerzeloyde fortwährend; in irgendeiner der übersinnlichen Funktionen ist er im Grunde genommen immer da. Deshalb findet man ihn auch wieder bei bedeutsamen Ereignissen in der übersinnlichen Welt, die mit dieser Michael-Strömung zusammenhängen, am Ende des achtzehnten und am Beginn des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts.
[ 9 ] Ich habe ja früher hingewiesen auf die große übersinnliche Lehrschule im fünfzehnten, sechzehnten Jahrhundert, die unter Michaels Ägide selber stand. Dann begann ein Leben für diejenigen, die in dieser Lehrschule waren, das sich so abspielte, daß Kraftentwickelungen, Tätigkeiten in der geistigen Welt abliefen, daß diese Tätigkeiten herunterwirkten in die physische Welt, im Zusammenhang wirkten mit der physischen Welt. So zum Beispiel fiel gerade in dieser Zeit, die nun folgte auf die Zeit dieser Lehrschule, eine wichtige Aufgabe einer Individualität zu, von deren fortlaufendem Leben ich ja öfter gesprochen habe: der Individualität Alexanders des Großen.
[ 10 ] Ich habe ja auch hier aufmerksam darauf gemacht, wie Baco von Verulam, Lord Bacon, der wiedererstandene Harun al Raschid ist. Und das Merkwürdige ist dieses, daß im Zusammenhang mit Lord Bacons Anschauungen, die einen so intensiven, maßgebenden Einfluß auf die ganze folgende Geistesentwickelung gerade in feineren geistigen Bestrebungen gehabt haben, in Lord Bacon etwas geschah, was man bezeichnen könnte wie ein krankhaftes Heraustreiben alter Spiritualität, die er schon immerhin als Harun al Raschid gehabt hat. Und so sehen wir denn, daß von dem Impuls dieses Lord Bacon ausgeht eine ganze Welt dämonischer Wesenheiten. Es wird die Welt geradezu davon erfüllt, übersinnlich und sinnlich erfüllt — sinnlich, natürlich nicht anschaulich — ich meine, die sinnliche Welt wird erfüllt von dämonischen Wesenheiten. Der Individualität Alexanders fällt es zu, hauptsächlich den Kampf zu führen gegen diese Dämonen-Idole des Lord Bacon, des Baco von Verulam.
[ 11 ] Und ähnliche Tätigkeiten, die außerordentlich wichtig sind, geschehen unten, sonst wäre der Materialismus des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts noch in viel verheerenderer Weise hereingebrochen. Ähnliche Tätigkeiten, die sich im Zusammenhange der geistigen und der physischen Welt abspielten, die fielen dann der Michael-Strömung zu, bis in übersinnlichen Regionen am Ende des achtzehnten und Beginn des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts das stattfand, was ich schon einmal hier genannt habe: das Aufleben eines übersinnlichen bedeutsamen Kultus.
[ 12 ] In der übersinnlichen Welt wurde dazumal ein Kultus eingerichtet, der in realen Imaginationen geistiger Art sich abspielte. So daß man sagen kann: Am Ende des achtzehnten und Beginn des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts schwebt eigentlich unmittelbar angrenzend, ganz in der Nähe — natürlich ist das qualitativ gemeint — der physisch-sinnlichen Welt ein übersinnliches Geschehen, das darstellt übersinnliche Kultushandlungen, mächtige Bilder-Entwickelung des geistigen Lebens, der Weltenwesenheiten, der Wesenheiten der Hierarchien, im Zusammenhange mit den großen Ätherwirkungen des Kosmos und mit den menschlichen Wirkungen auf der Erde. Es ist interessant, daß in einem besonders günstigen Augenblicke von dieser übersinnlichen Kultusbetätigung, ich möchte sagen, ein Miniaturbildchen einströmte in Goethes Geist. Und dieses Miniaturbildchen, dieses metamorphosierte, veränderte Miniaturbildchen haben wir von Goethe hingemalt in seinem «Märchen von der grünen Schlange und der schönen Lilie». Es ist so ein Fall, wo leise nun etwas durchbricht. Sehen Sie, das war ein übersinnlicher Kultus, an dem sich vorzugsweise diejenigen beteiligt haben, welche mit teilgenommen haben an der Michael-Strömung bei all den Offenbarungen, den übersinnlichen und sinnlichen Offenbarungen, von denen ich gesprochen habe.
[ 13 ] Überall spielt da die Individualität, die zuletzt in Tycho de Brahe war, eine außerordentlich große Rolle. Er war überall bestrebt, die großen, dauernden Impulse dessen, was man Heidentum, was man altes Mysterienwesen nennt, eben auch zum besseren Verständnis des Christentumes zu erhalten. In das Christentum war er eingezogen, während er als Seele der Herzeloyde lebte. Jetzt war er bestrebt, alles dasjenige, was er durch seine Julian-Apostata-Initiation hatte, einzuführen in die Vorstellungen des Christentums. Das war es ja ganz besonders, was wichtig erschien für diejenigen Seelen, von denen ich da gesprochen habe. Mit allen diesen Strömungen sind die zahlreichen Seelen verbunden, die jetzt in der anthroposophischen Bewegung sich finden, die ehrlich nach dieser Bewegung hinstreben. Sie fühlen sich angezogen von der Michael-Strömung gerade durch die innere Natur und Wesenheit dieser Michael-Strömung. Und Tycho de Brahe hatte einen bedeutenden Einfluß darauf, dal} diese Seelen nun am Ende des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts oder im Anfang des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts, vorzugsweise aber Ende des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts, vorbereitet auf die Erde herunterkamen, um den Christus nicht nur so zu schauen oder zu fühlen, wie ihn die verschiedenen Bekenntnisse fühlen, sondern wiederum in seiner ganzen grandiosen Weltherrlichkeit als den kosmischen Christus. Dazu wurden sie ja vorbereitet, auch übersinnlich zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt, durch solche Einflüsse wie die des Tycho de Brahe, der Seele, die zuletzt in Tycho de Brahe verkörpert war. So spielte diese Individualität eigentlich fortdauernd gerade innerhalb dieser Michael-Strömung eine außerordentlich bedeutsame Rolle.
[ 14 ] Sehen Sie, es wurde ja immer hingeschaut — sowohl innerhalb der alten Lehrschule im fünfzehnten und sechzehnten Jahrhundert wie später bei der Verrichtung des übersinnlichen Kultus, der einleiten sollte gewissermaßen von der übersinnlichen Welt aus die spätere, neu eintretende spätere Michael-Herrschaft auf Erden —, es wurde ja überall hingewiesen auf die kommende Michael-Herrschaft.
[ 15 ] Nun blieben eine ganze Anzahl — ich habe das schon angedeutet — platonisch begabter Seelen seit ihrer Wirksamkeit in Chartres in der geistigen Welt. Ich habe heute andere Bilder aus der Sammlung von Bildern über Chartres hier anheften lassen, Prophetenbilder, aber auch Bilder der außerordentlich wunderbaren Architektur von Chartres. Die Individualitäten der Lehrer von Chartres, die gerade platonisch geartet waren, sie blieben in der geistigen Welt. Herunter stiegen mehr die Aristoteliker, die zum Beispiel im Dominikaner-Orden vielfach waren, dann aber nach einer bestimmten Zeit sich vereinigten und eben auch von der geistigen Welt aus auf übersinnliche Art mit den Platonikern zusammen wirkten. So daß man sagen kann: Eigentlich sind immer zurückgeblieben die platonisch gearteten Seelen; sie sind bis heute in ihren wesentlicheren Individualitäten nicht wiederum auf der Erde erschienen, sondern warten bis zum Ende dieses Jahrhunderts.
[ 16 ] Dagegen sind gerade viele, die sich angezogen fühlten von dem, was ich beschrieben habe als die Michael-Taten im Übersinnlichen, die sich in ehrlicher Weise zu einer solchen spirituellen Bewegung hingezogen fühlten, eben in die Strömung der anthroposophischen Bewegung eingelaufen. Und man kann schon sagen: Dasjenige, was in der Anthroposophie lebt, das ist angeregt zunächst von der Michael-Lehrschule im fünfzehnten, sechzehnten Jahrhundert und von jenem Kultus, der am Ende des achtzehnten Jahrhunderts und im Beginn des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts übersinnlich stattfand.
[ 17 ] Es ist ja auch aus diesem Grunde, daß, als im Hinblick auf diesen übersinnlichen Kultus meine Mysterienspiele entstanden, gerade das erste Mysterium, trotzdem es sich viel unterscheidet von Goethes «Märchen von der grünen Schlange und der schönen Lilie», doch deutlich ähnliche Züge aufweist. Diese Dinge, die reale Impulse spiritueller Art enthalten wollen, können eben nicht aus den Fingern gesogen werden, sondern werden durchaus im Einklange mit der geistigen Welt geschaut und gearbeitet.
[ 18 ] So stehen wir heute da mit der anthroposophischen Bewegung, die eingelaufen ist in die mittlerweile eingetretene Michael-Herrschaft, berufen dazu, gerade das Wesen dieser Michael-Herrschaft zu verstehen, berufen dazu, gerade im Sinne des Wirkens Michaels durch die Jahrhunderte und die Jahrtausende, jetzt, wo er wieder seine Erdenherrschaft in einem besonders bedeutsamen Momente antritt, berufen, in dieser Richtung zu wirken. Es liegt in dem inneren Esoterischen dieser Michael-Strömung, daß in einer ganz bestimmten Weise vorgezeichnet ist, zunächst für dieses Jahrhundert, dasjenige, was geschehen wird.
[ 19 ] Aber sehen Sie, meine lieben Freunde, für die Anthroposophie, wenn man sie so ihrem heutigen Inhalte nach nimmt und sie rückwärts verfolgt, findet man wenig Erdenvorbereitung. Gehen Sie nur etwas zurück von dem, was heute als Anthroposophie auftritt, und suchen Sie unbefangen, nicht etwa den Sinn getrübt durch allerlei philologische Spitzfindigkeiten, sondern unbefangen irgendwo Quellen für diese Anthroposophie etwa im Laufe dieses neunzehnten Jahrhunderts: Sie finden sie nicht. Sie finden einzelne Spuren von spiritueller Auffassung, die dann wie Keime, aber Keime sehr spärlicher Art, Verwendung finden konnten in dem ganzen Gefüge der Anthroposophie; aber eine eigentliche Vorbereitung innerhalb des Irdischen ist ja nicht vorhanden.
[ 20 ] Um so stärker ist die Vorbereitung im Übersinnlichen. Und schließlich, inwiefern Goethes Wirken, auch nach seinem Tode — wenn auch das in meinen Büchern anders aussieht — mitgewirkt hat an der Gestaltung der Anthroposophie, das wissen Sie ja alle. Das Wichtigste in bezug auf diese Dinge, das unmittelbar Wichtigste hat sich schon im Übersinnlichen abgespielt. Aber wiederum wenn man so lebendig zurückverfolgt das geistige Leben des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts bis zu Goethe, Herder, sogar meinetwillen bis zu Lessing zurück, dann erscheint einem dennoch dasjenige, was in einzelnen Geistern des ablaufenden achtzehnten Jahrhunderts, der ersten Hälfte des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts gewirkt hat, wenn es auch wie zum Beispiel bei Hegel in starken Abstraktionen auftritt oder in abstrakt bildhafter Arc wie bei Schelling, es erscheint einem dennoch mindestens sehr stark spirituell angehaucht.
[ 21 ] Denn ich glaube, man erkennt in meinen «Rätseln der Philosophie» aus der Art und Weise, wie ich Schelling, wie ich Hegel geschildert habe, daß ich dennoch in dem Geistig-Seelischen dieser Entwickelung der Weltanschauung auf etwas hinweisen wollte, was dann einlaufen kann in das Anthroposophische. Ich versuchte ja auch in meinem Buche «Die Rätsel der Philosophie» diese Abstraktionen, die da auftreten, ich möchte sagen, mit dem Gemüte zu erfassen. Ich darf da vielleicht ganz besonders auf das Kapitel über Hegel hinweisen, auch auf manches, was über Schelling gesagt ist.
[ 22 ] Aber man muß eben doch noch tiefer gehen. Dann findet man merkwürdige Erscheinungen, die da im Geistesleben der ersten Hälfte des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts auftreten und die dann nur, ich möchte sagen, zunächst versanken in demjenigen, was geistiges Leben, materialistisches Leben der zweiten Hälfte des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts war. Und doch tritt in alledem etwas auf, worin, wenn auch in abstrakten Begriffen, eben durchaus Spirituelles ist, spirituelles Leben und Weben darinnen ist.
[ 23 ] Insbesondere interessant und immer interessanter, je mehr man sich in ihn einliest, wird der Philosoph Schelling. Ich möchte sagen, er beginnt fast wie Fichte mit willensdurchtränkten, scharf markierten, reinen Ideen. So trat ja Fichte auf. Johann Gottlieb Fichte ist ja eine der wenigen Persönlichkeiten in der Weltgeschichte, vielleicht in seiner Art überhaupt einzig in gewisser Beziehung, eine Persönlichkeit, die die stärksten Begriffsabstraktionen zu gleicher Zeit mit Enthusiasmus und Energie des Willens verband, so daß man gerade in ihm eine sehr interessante Erscheinung vor sich hat: Der kurze, gedrungene Fichte, im Wachstum etwas zurückgeblieben durch die Entbehrungen der Jugend, der, wenn man ihm auf der Straße nachschaute, mit einem ungeheuer fest auftretenden Schritte ging, alles Wille, Wille, der sich auslebt in der Darstellung der abstraktesten Begriffe, aber mit diesen abstraktesten Begriffen doch wiederum so etwas erreicht wie jene «Reden an die deutsche Nation», die er gehalten hat, mit denen er unzählige auf wunderbare Weise begeistert hat.
[ 24 ] Schelling tritt fast fichtisch auf, nicht mit solcher Kraft, aber mit solcher Gedankenart. Wir sehen aber sehr bald, daß sich Schellings Geist erweitert. Geradeso wie Fichte von Ich und Nicht-Ich und von allerlei ähnlichem Abstrakten redet, redet auch Schelling in seiner Jugend, begeistert damit auch in Jena die Leute. Aber ihn verläßt das alsobald, der Geist erweitert sich, und wir sehen in ihn einziehen, wenn auch phantasie-gestaltete, aber wiederum fast nach Imaginationen hinzielende Vorstellungen. Es geht eine Weile weiter, dann vertieft er sich in solche Geister wie Jakob Böhme, beschreibt etwas, was dem ganzen Ton und Stile nach ganz verschieden ist von seiner früheren Wirksamkeit: die Grundlage der menschlichen Freiheit, eine Art Auferweckung der Ideen Jakob Böhmes. Wir sehen dann, wie in Schelling der Platonismus fast auflebt. Ein Weltanschauungsgespräch «Bruno» verfaßt er, das wirklich an Platos Gespräche erinnert, das sehr eindringlich ist. Interessant ist auch ein anderes Schriftchen, «Clara», worinnen die übersinnliche Welt eine große Rolle spielt.
[ 25 ] Dann schweigt Schelling furchtbar lange. Er wird von seinen Mit-Philosophen, ich möchte sagen, für einen Lebendig-Toten gehalten und veröffentlicht dann nur die außerordentlich bedeutsame Schrift über die Samothrakischen Mysterien, — wiederum Erweiterung seines Geistes. Er lebt aber vorerst noch in München, bis ihn der König von Preußen beruft, an der Berliner Universität diejenige Philosophie vorzutragen, von der Schelling sagt, daß er sie in der Stille seiner Einsamkeit durch die Jahrzehnte hindurch erarbeitet habe. Und jetzt tritt Schelling in Berlin auf mit derjenigen Philosophie, die dann in seinen nachgelassenen Werken als «Philosophie der Mythologie» und als «Philosophie der Offenbarung» enthalten ist. Er macht keinen großen Eindruck auf das Berliner Publikum, denn der Tenor dessen, was er in Berlin redet, ist doch eigentlich der: Mit allem Nachdenken bringt der Mensch es zu gar nichts in bezug auf die Weltanschauungen; es muß etwas in die Menschenseele hineinkommen, was als wirkliche geistige Welt das Nachdenken durchlebt.
[ 26 ] Da erscheint plötzlich statt der alten rationalistischen Philosophie bei Schelling ein Wiedererwecken der alten Götterphilosophie, der Mythologie, ein Wiedererwecken der alten Götter, und zwar in einer auf der einen Seite ganz modernen Weise; aber aus allem sieht man: Da wirkt nach alte Geistigkeit. Es ist ganz merkwürdig.
[ 27 ] Was er über das Christentum in der Philosophie der Offenbarung entwickelt, darin sind immerhin bedeutsame Anregungen gegeben, wenn auch in ganz abstrakten Formen, für dasjenige, was für manchen Punkt des Christentums auch innerhalb der Anthroposophie aus der geistigen Anschauung heraus gesagt werden muß.
[ 28 ] So leicht wie die Berliner kann man ganz gewiß über Schelling nicht hinweggehen. Man kann überhaupt nicht über ihn hinweggehen! Die Berliner gingen ganz leicht drüber hinweg. Als sich ein Sprößling Schellings vermählte mit der Tochter eines preußischen Ministers — ein äußerlich mit der Sache zusammenhängendes, wenn auch karmisch zusammenhängendes Ereignis —, hörte ein preußischer Funktionär von dieser Tatsache und sagte, früher hätte er nie gewußt, warum eigentlich Schelling nach Berlin gekommen wäre, jetzt wüßte er es.
[ 29 ] Aber man kann schon in innere Schwierigkeiten und Konflikte hineinkommen, wenn man Schelling so verfolgt. Zu alledem wird immer diese letzte Periode Schellings in den Philosophie-Geschichten zwar greulich geschildert, aber es steht überall da über diesem Kapitel der Titel: «Schellings Theosophie». — Nun, es war immer wiederum so, daß ich mich mit Schelling viel beschäftigte. Es ging immer, trotz der abstrakten Form, eine bestimmte Wärme aus von dem, was in Schelling lebte. So habe ich in verhältnismäßiger Jugend zum Beispiel mich viel beschäftigt mit jenem platonischen Gespräche, das ich eben erwähnt habe: «Bruno, oder über das göttliche und natürliche Prinzip der Dinge».
[ 30 ] Schelling, der ja seit dem Jahre 1854 wieder in der geistigen Welt weilte, Schelling kam einem eigentlich gerade durch dieses Gespräch «Bruno», wenn man es vornahm, es durchlebte, durch seine «Clara», namentlich aber durch die Schrift über die Samothrakischen Mysterien ungemein nahe. Man kam leicht in die wirkliche, reale, spirituelle Nähe Schellings. Und da wurde mir denn doch eigentlich schon im Beginn der neunziger Jahre des vorigen Jahrhunderts völlig klar — bei den anderen Persönlichkeiten, die für die Weltanschauung in der ersten Hälfte des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts wirkten, mag das gewesen sein wie immer, aber bei Schelling war es klar —: da wirkt geistige Inspiration dennoch herein. In Schelling wirkte geistige Inspiration fortdauernd herein.
[ 31 ] Und so konnte man das folgende Bild haben: Sagen wir, zunächst unten in der physischen Welt den durch seine mannigfachen Lebensschicksale gehenden Schelling, der, wie ich gesagt habe, unter diesen Schicksalen eine lange Einsamkeit hatte, der in der mannigfaltigsten Weise behandelt wurde von seinen Mitmenschen, zuweilen mit riesiger, großartiger Begeisterung, zuweilen verhöhnt, verspottet, dieser Schelling, der eigentlich immer einen bedeutsamen Eindruck machte, wenn er wieder persönlich auftrat, er, der kurze, gedrungene Mann mit dem ungeheuer ausdrucksvollen Kopfe, den im spätesten Alter noch funkelnden, feuerfunkelnden Augen, aus denen das Feuer der Wahrheit sprach, das Feuer der Erkenntnis, dieser Schelling, man kann ganz deutlich sehen, je mehr man auf ihn eingeht: er hat Momente, wo Inspiration von oben in ihn hereinfällt.
[ 32 ] Am alleranschaulichsten wurde mir das, als ich die Rezensionen von Robert Zimmermann — von dem Sie ja wissen, daß von ihm das Wort «Anthroposophie» herrührt, aber seine Anthroposophie ist ein Gestrüppe von Begriffen — über Schellings Schrift über die «Weltalter» las. Ich schätze Robert Zimmermann sehr, aber dazumal mußte ich denn doch innerlich in den Seufzer ausbrechen: O du Philister!
[ 33 ] Da ging ich denn wieder zurück zu Schellings Schrift selber von den Weltaltern, die ja auch etwas abstrakt geschrieben ist, von der man aber sogleich erkennt: Da ist etwas drinnen wie eine Schilderung der alten Atlantis in ganz spiritueller Art, mannigfach verzerrt durch die Abstraktionen, aber es ist etwas darinnen.
[ 34 ] Sie sehen also, es ist überall etwas da, was gerade bei Schelling so hereinwirkt, daß man sagen kann: Da unten ist Schelling, und da oben geschieht etwas, was auf Schelling herunterwirkt. Da bei Schelling wird es besonders anschaulich, daß eigentlich ein fortwährendes Wechselspiel der geistigen Welt oben und der Erdenwelt unten in bezug auf die geistige Entwickelung vorhanden ist. Und als ich dann einmal so in der Mitte der neunziger Jahre ganz besonders intensiv damit beschäftigt war, dasjenige aufzusuchen, was die spirituellen Grundlagen des Michael-Zeitalters sind und ähnliches, und wo ich dann selber hineinkam in eine Lebensphase — ich kann ja diese Dinge im «Lebensgang» nur andeuten, aber ich habe es schon angedeutet —, in der ich stark miterleben mußte die Welt, die unmittelbar angrenzt an unsere sinnlich-physische Welt, die aber eben doch durch eine dünne Wand von ihr getrennt ist — in dieser nächsten Welt spielen sich ja eigentlich die gigantischen Tatsachen ab, sie sind gar nicht so stark getrennt von unserer Welt —, als ich da in Weimar war, wo ich auf der einen Seite außerordentlich stark das gesellige Leben von Weimar nach allen Seiten hin miterlebte, aber zur gleichen Zeit die innere Notwendigkeit hatte, mich wiederum stark von allem zurückzuziehen, so daß diese Dinge parallel gingen: da war das für mich selber aufs höchste gestiegen, daß eigentlich immer bei mir ein stärkeres Miterleben der geistigen Welt als der physischen Welt vorhanden war. So daß es mir schon als junger Mensch nicht sehr schwer geworden ist, irgendeine Weltanschauung, die in meine Sphäre trat, schnell zu überblicken; aber ich mußte mir irgendeinen Stein oder eine Pflanze, die ich wiedererkennen sollte, nicht drei-, viermal, sondern fünfzig-, sechzigmal anschauen, — ich konnte nicht leicht die Seele verbinden mit demjenigen, was in der physischen Welt auf physische Art Namen bekommt.
[ 35 ] Das war damals aufs höchste gestiegen gerade während der Weimarer Zeit. Weimar ist ja dazumal, lange bevor die konstitutionelle Republikaner-Versammlung dort stattgefunden hat, wirklich ein Ort gewesen wie eine Oase, wie eine geistige Oase, ganz anders als andere Orte in Deutschland. Da in diesem Weimar, wie ich in meinem «Lebensgang» gesagt habe, erlebte ich schon meine Einsamkeiten. Und da nahm ich dann wieder einmal, um hinter manches zu kommen, Schellings «Gottheiten von Samothrake» und seine «Philosophie der Mythologie» 1897 eigentlich bloß zur Anregung in die Hand, nicht um drinnen zu studieren, sondern zur Anregung, so wie man äußere Hilfsmittel verwendet. Nicht wahr, sagen wir, es will irgendeiner, der in der geistigen Welt forscht, sich einmal die Forschung erleichtern: es sind eben bloß äußere Hilfsmittel, die man da hat, wie man ja auch technische Hilfsmittel hat, die dann mit der eigentlichen Sache nicht recht im Zusammenhang stehen. Will einer, sagen wir, über die Zeit der ersten christlichen Jahrhunderte forschen, so legt er sich einmal ein paar Nächte die Schriften des heiligen Augustinus oder des Clemens von Alexandrien unter den Kopf; das ist eine äußere Anregung, wie irgendein technisches Hilfsmittel beim Erinnern. So nahm ich dazumal die «Gottheiten von Samothrake» des Schelling, die «Philosophie der Mythologie» in die Hand. Aber eigentlich hatte ich dasjenige im Auge, was da im Laufe des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts sich eben so abspielte, daß) es dann gleichsam erst herunterströmte und zur Anthroposophie werden konnte.
[ 36 ] Da, als ich Schelling wirklich nun in seinem biographischen Werdegang verfolgen konnte, aber nicht deutlich — klar wurde das erst viel, viel später, als ich meine «Rätsel der Philosophie» geschrieben habe —, da konnte ich — wie gesagt, nicht ganz deutlich — wahrnehmen, wie vieles in Schellings Schriften eigentlich von ihm nur unter Inspiration niedergeschrieben ist, und daß der Inspirierende Julian Apostata-Herzeloyde-Tycho de Brahe ist, der nicht wieder selber auf dem physischen Plane erschienen ist, aber durch Schellings Seele ungeheuer viel gewirkt hat. Und dabei wurde ich gewahr, daß gerade dieser Tycho de Brahe in einer eminent starken Weise nach seinem Tycho de Brahe-Dasein fortgeschritten ist. Durch Schellings Leiblichkeit konnte ja nur wenig durchgehen. Aber wenn man das einmal weiß, daß da Tycho de Brahes Individualität als inspirierend über Schelling schwebt, und dann die genialen Blitze in den «Gottheiten von Samothrake», die genialen Blitze namentlich am Schlusse der «Philosophie der Offenbarung» liest, mit der in ihrer Art doch großartigen Interpretation Schellings der alten Mysterien, und namentlich wenn man sich in die Sprache, die Schelling da führt, in die so merkwürdige Sprache vertieft, dann hört man bald nicht Schelling reden, sondern Tycho de Brahe. Und dann wird man eben gewahr, wie unter anderen Geistern gerade dieser Tycho de Brahe, der ja auch als Individualität in Julian Apostata war, viel dazu beigetragen hat, daß manches heraufgekommen ist im neueren Geistesleben, was dennoch wiederum so anregend gewirkt hat, daß wenigstens die äußeren Formen des Ausdruckes für das anthroposophisch Geartete manchmal davon hergenommen sind.
[ 37 ] Dann wiederum, eine der Schriften aus der deutschen Philosophie, die auf mich einen großen Eindruck gemacht haben, ist die Schrift von Jakob Frohschammer: «Die Phantasie als Grundprinzip des Weltprozesses», eine geistvolle Schrift vom Ende des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts. Geistvoll deshalb, weil dieser mutige Mann, der von der Kirche ausgestoßen worden ist, dessen Schriften auf den Index gesetzt wurden, der mutig war auch der Wissenschaft gegenüber, die Verwandtschaft aufdeckte zwischen dem, was rein seelisch in der Phantasie schafft, wenn der Mensch künstlerisch schafft, und demjenigen, was innerlich als Wachstum und Lebenskraft wirkt. Dazu gehörte schon etwas in jener Zeit. «Die Phantasie als Grundprinzip des Weltprozesses», als weltschöpferische Macht, ist schon eine bedeutsame Schrift.
[ 38 ] So interessierte mich wiederum dieser Jakob Frohschammer sehr. Ich suchte ihm beizukommen, eben auch real, nicht bloß durch seine Schriften. Wiederum fand ich: Der inspirierende Geist ist derselbe, der in Tycho de Brahe, in Julian Apostata gelebt hat.
[ 39 ] So gibt es eine ganze Reihe von Persönlichkeiten, bei denen man sehen kann, wie etwas vorbereitend wirkte für dasjenige, was dann Anthroposophie geworden ist. Aber man braucht überall dahinter das spirituelle Licht, das im Übersinnlichen wirkt. Denn was vorher auf die Erde davon heruntergekommen ist, das sind eben doch Abstraktionen geblieben. Nur konkretisieren sie sich zuweilen bei solch einem Geiste wie Schelling oder bei einem so mutvollen Menschen wie Jakob Frohschammer.
[ 40 ] Und sehen Sie, wenn wir heute hinaufschauen zu dem, was da eigentlich wirkt im Übersinnlichen, und wissen, wie Anthroposophie zu dem steht, und wenn wir die Forschung ausdehnen auch in bezug auf die Geschichte in das ganz Konkrete hinein, in das konkrete Geistesleben hinein, dann dient uns wohl auch dieses ganz vorzüglich: Da auf der Erde sind ehrlich zur Anthroposophie strebend eine Anzahl von Seelen, welche den Michael-Strömungen immer nahegestanden haben; da sind in der übersinnlichen Welt eine Anzahl von Seelen, namentlich die Lehrer von Chartres, die zurückgeblieben sind. Zwischen denen, die hier in der sinnlichen Welt sind, und denen, die oben sind in der geistigen Welt, besteht die entschiedenste Tendenz, ihre Wirksamkeiten miteinander zu vereinen.
[ 41 ] Und sehen Sie, will man nun für das, was man erforschen soll für die Zukunft des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts, einen bedeutsamen Helfer haben, sozusagen jemanden, der einem raten kann in bezug auf die übersinnliche Welt, wenn man Impulse braucht, die da drinnen sind, dann ist es die Individualität des Julian ApostataTycho de Brahe. Sie ist heute nicht auf dem physischen Plan, aber sie ist eigentlich immer da und gibt immer Auskunft über diejenigen Dinge, die sich namentlich auf das Prophetische in bezug auf das zwanzigste Jahrhundert beziehen.
[ 42 ] Und all das zusammennehmend, stellt sich doch heraus: Diejenigen Menschen, die heute in ehrlicher Weise die Anthroposophie aufnehmen, sie bereiten ihre Seele dazu vor, mit möglichster Abkürzung des Lebens zwischen Tod und neuer Geburt am Ende des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts wiederum zu erscheinen und dann auch vereint zu sein mit jenen Lehrern von Chartres, die zurückgeblieben sind.
[ 43 ] Und das ist etwas, meine lieben Freunde, was wir aufnehmen sollten in unsere Seelen: dieses Bewußtsein, daß die anthroposophische Bewegung in ihrem Wesentlichsten dazu berufen ist, weiter zu wirken, — und nicht nur in ihren bedeutsamsten, sondern fast in allen ihren Seelen wieder zu erscheinen mit dem Ende des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts, wo der große Anstoß für das geistige, für das spirituelle Leben auf Erden gegeben werden soll, weil sonst endgültig die Erdenzivilisation in ihre Dekadenz hineinzieht, deren Eigenschaften sie ja heute so stark zeigt.
[ 44 ] Das ist es, was ich gerne möchte: aus solchen Untergründen heraus in Ihren Herzen, meine lieben Freunde, etwas von den Flammen anzünden, die wir brauchen, um das geistige Leben so stark schon jetzt innerhalb der anthroposophischen Bewegung zu machen, daß wir in der rechten Weise vorbereitet erscheinen, wenn jene große Epoche, mit der wir wieder wirken werden auf Erden nach abgekürztem übersinnlichem Leben, wenn jene große Epoche erscheint, bei der für die Rettung der Erde geradezu in ihren wichtigsten Gliedern auf dasjenige gerechnet wird, was Anthroposophen vermögen.
[ 45 ] Ich denke, schon der Hinblick auf diese Perspektive der Zukunft kann Anthroposophen begeistern, kann Anthroposophen dazu bringen, in sich die Gefühle hervorzurufen, welche sie in rechter, energischer, tatkräftiger, mit Enthusiasmus gezierter Weise durch das gegenwärtige Erdenleben tragen, damit das eine Vorbereitung sein kann für dasjenige am Ende des Jahrhunderts, wo eben Anthroposophie zu dem Angedeuteten berufen sein soll.
Sixth Lecture
[ 1 ] I would like to continue today with the reflection I made here the day before yesterday. We were at the point where we dropped the thread of development, as it plays into the spiritual life of the present, with the individuality of Julian Apostata, or rather the individuality that lived in Julian Apostata and of which I have indicated to you that it was first embodied in the personality of which there is only legendary news, of the personality that is secreted into the Parsifal saga as Herzeloyde. It was a deepened soul-life that entered the soul of the former Julian Apostata, a deepened soul-life that this individuality truly needed, needed in the face of the storms and the inner moods of opposition that it had just gone through in its existence as Julian Apostata. This life of which I have spoken to you was one that spread over the Julian Apostata life like a peaceful, warm cloud. And so the soul became more intense inwardly. The soul also became richer, richer in the most diverse inner impulses.
[ 2 ] But this soul, because it belonged to those who had still taken over something of the old Mysteries, who had still lived within the substance of the old Mysteries at a time when these Mysteries were still brightly shining in a certain respect, this soul had absorbed much of the spirituality of the cosmos. This had been pushed back, so to speak, during the incarnation of Herzeloyde, but pushed up in the soul, and so we find this individuality again in the sixteenth century. And in the sixteenth century we recognize in this individuality how that which it had gone through as Julian Apostata rises up in a Christianized form. This individuality appears as Tycho de Brahe in the sixteenth century and stands opposite that which emerges in Western civilization as the Copernican worldview.
[ 3 ] This Copernican worldview gave a picture of the universe which, when pursued to its ultimate consequences, now works entirely towards driving spirituality out of the cosmos in the worldview. The Copernican world view ultimately leads to a completely mechanical-machine conception of the universe in space. And after all, it is this Copernican world view that led a famous astronomer to say to Napoleon that he could find no God within this universe; he had explored everything and found no God. It is precisely the exorcism of all spirituality.
[ 4 ] The characterized individuality that was now present in Tycho de Brahe could not submit to this. Hence we see how Tycho de Brahe, with regard to his worldview, accepts that which is useful in Copernicanism, but how he rejects the absolute movement that had to be attributed to the earth in the sense of the Copernican worldview. And in Tycho de Brahe we see this bound up with real spirituality, spirituality in which, if we look at the course of his life, we can almost see how old karma pushes up into Tycho de Brahe's life, pushes up with all its might, wants to become the content of consciousness. Thus his Danish relatives try in every way to keep him in the legal profession; he has to study jurisprudence under the supervision of a tutor in Leipzig and can only spare himself the hours during which he communes with the gods at night while the tutor sleeps. And this reveals - as his biography also contains - something highly peculiar.
[ 5 ] You will see that this is important for the later assessment of the Tycho de Brahe-Herzeloyde-Julian individuality. Even with very primitive instruments, which he put together himself, he discovers significant calculation errors that have been made with regard to the location of Saturn and Jupiter. And we have the strange scene in Tycho de Brahe's life in which he, as a young man with primitive instruments, with which one would otherwise not even think of being able to do anything, one day feels compelled to seek out the exact locations in the sky for Saturn and Jupiter. Such things are then interspersed with spirituality, with spirituality that leads him into a conception of the universe that one must actually have if one strives towards modern initiatism, where one then comes to speak of spiritual beings in the same way as one speaks of physical people on earth, because you can actually always meet them, because basically there is only a difference in being, a difference in the quality of being, between those human individualities that dwell here on the physical plane and those that are disembodied and live between death and a new birth.
[ 6 ] This, however, stimulated in Tycho de Brahe an immensely significant insight into those connections that arise when one no longer looks at everything here on earth as caused by earthly impulses and only calculates this mathematically above in the stars, but when one sees through the interplay of stellar impulses and human historical impulses. Through that instinctiveness in the soul which he had brought with him from his Julian Apostata life, which at that time during the Julian Apostata life was not permeated by rationalism or intellectualism, but which was intuitive, imaginative - such was the inner life of Julian Apostata - through all this he then succeeded in doing something very sensational.
[ 7 ] He was not able to make much of an impression on his contemporaries with his astronomical views, which differed from Copernicus, with what he otherwise achieved in astronomy. He observed countless stars and drew a star chart, which alone made it possible for Kepler to arrive at his great results. Kepler arrived at his Keplerian laws on the basis of Tycho de Brahe's star chart. However, all of this would probably not have made the great impression on his contemporaries that one not exactly significant but striking thing did: he prophesied the death of Sultan Soliman almost to the day, which then came to pass just as he had predicted. We really do see Tycho de Brahe working his way into a more recent era, combined with a spiritual intellectuality, I would say, old views that he had absorbed as Julian Apostata. We see all this working its way into the modern age in this Tycho de Brahe. And Tycho de Brahe is already one of the most interesting souls who, when he passed through the gate of death in the seventeenth century, was transported up into the spiritual world.
[ 8 ] Now, in the currents which I have described as Michael currents, Tycho de Brahe-Julian-Apostata-Herzeloyde is actually to be found continually; in one of the supersensible functions he is basically always there. That is why we find him again in significant events in the supersensible world connected with this Michael current at the end of the eighteenth and the beginning of the nineteenth century.
[ 9 ] I referred earlier to the great supersensible school of teaching in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, which was under the aegis of Michael himself. Then began a life for those who were in this school of teaching, which took place in such a way that developments of power, activities in the spiritual world took place, that these activities worked down into the physical world, worked in connection with the physical world. Thus, for example, just at this time, which now followed the time of this school of teaching, an important task fell to an individuality whose ongoing life I have often spoken of: the individuality of Alexander the Great.
[ 10 ] I have also pointed out here how Baco of Verulam, Lord Bacon, is the resurrected Harun al Rashid. And the strange thing is this, that in connection with Lord Bacon's views, which have had such an intensive, decisive influence on the whole subsequent spiritual development, especially in finer spiritual endeavors, something happened in Lord Bacon which could be described as a pathological expelling of old spirituality, which he had already had as Harun al Raschid. And so we see that a whole world of demonic entities emanates from the impulse of this Lord Bacon. The world is virtually filled with them, supersensibly and sensually filled - sensually, of course, not vividly - I mean, the sensual world is filled with demonic entities. It falls to Alexander's individuality mainly to lead the fight against these demonic idols of Lord Bacon, of Baco of Verulam.
[ 11 ] And similar activities, which are extraordinarily important, happen below, otherwise the materialism of the nineteenth century would have broken in in a much more devastating way. Similar activities, which took place in the connection between the spiritual and the physical world, then fell to the Michael current, until in the supersensible regions at the end of the eighteenth and beginning of the nineteenth century what I have already mentioned here took place: the revival of a supersensible, significant cultus.
[ 12 ] A cult was established in the supersensible world at that time, which took place in real imaginations of a spiritual nature. So that one can say: At the end of the eighteenth century and the beginning of the nineteenth century there was actually a supersensible happening directly adjacent to the physical-sensible world, very close to it - of course this is meant qualitatively - which represented supersensible cult acts, powerful image-development of spiritual life, of the world entities, of the entities of the Hierarchies, in connection with the great etheric effects of the cosmos and with the human effects on earth. It is interesting that at a particularly favorable moment from this supersensible cult activity, I would like to say, a miniature picture flowed into Goethe's spirit. And we have this miniature picture, this metamorphosed, altered miniature picture painted by Goethe in his “Fairy Tale of the Green Snake and the Beautiful Lily”. It is such a case where something quietly breaks through. You see, this was a supersensible cult in which those who participated in the Michael current in all the revelations, the supersensible and sensual revelations, of which I have spoken, took part.
[ 13 ] The individuality that was last in Tycho de Brahe played an extraordinarily large role everywhere. He endeavored everywhere to preserve the great, enduring impulses of what is called paganism, what is called the old mysteries, also for a better understanding of Christianity. He had entered Christianity while he was living as the soul of Herzeloyde. Now he endeavored to introduce everything he had gained through his Julian Apostata initiation into the mental images of Christianity. That was what seemed particularly important for the souls I was talking about. The numerous souls who are now to be found in the anthroposophical movement, who are honestly striving towards this movement, are connected with all these currents. They feel attracted to the Michael current precisely because of the inner nature and essence of this Michael current. And Tycho de Brahe had a significant influence on the fact that these souls came down to earth at the end of the nineteenth century or at the beginning of the twentieth century, but preferably at the end of the nineteenth century, prepared not only to see or feel the Christ as the various denominations feel him, but again in all his grandiose world glory as the cosmic Christ. They were prepared for this, also supersensibly between death and a new birth, through such influences as those of Tycho de Brahe, the soul that was ultimately embodied in Tycho de Brahe. So this individuality actually continued to play an extraordinarily important role within this Michael current.
[ 14 ] You see, it was always looked at - both within the old school of teaching in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries as well as later in the performance of the supersensible cult, which was to introduce, so to speak, from the supersensible world the later, newly occurring later Michael reign on earth - it was pointed out everywhere to the coming Michael reign.
[ 15 ] Now a whole number - I have already indicated this - of platonically gifted souls have remained in the spiritual world since their activity in Chartres. Today I have had other pictures from the collection of pictures about Chartres pinned here, pictures of prophets, but also pictures of the extraordinarily wonderful architecture of Chartres. The individualities of the Chartres teachers, who were of a Platonic nature, remained in the spiritual world. The Aristotelians, for example, who were numerous in the Dominican order, descended, but then after a certain time united and worked together with the Platonists from the spiritual world in a supersensible way. So that one can say: Actually, the Platonic souls have always remained behind; they have not reappeared on earth in their more essential individualities until today, but are waiting until the end of this century.
[ 16 ] In contrast, many of those who felt attracted by what I have described as the Michaelic deeds in the supersensible, who honestly felt drawn to such a spiritual movement, have just entered the current of the anthroposophical movement. And one can already say that what lives in anthroposophy is initially inspired by the Michael school of teaching in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries and by the supersensible cult that took place at the end of the eighteenth century and the beginning of the nineteenth century.
[ 17 ] It is also for this reason that, when my mystery plays were created with this supersensible cult in mind, the first mystery, although it differs greatly from Goethe's “Fairy Tale of the Green Snake and the Beautiful Lily”, has clearly similar features. These things, which want to contain real impulses of a spiritual nature, cannot be pulled out of one's fingers, but are seen and worked in harmony with the spiritual world.
[ 18 ] So we stand there today with the anthroposophical movement, which has entered the reign of Michael, called to understand precisely the nature of this reign of Michael, called to work in this direction precisely in the sense of Michael's work through the centuries and the millennia, now that he is again beginning his reign on earth at a particularly significant moment. It lies in the inner esoteric of this Michael current that what will happen is predetermined in a very specific way, initially for this century.
[ 19 ] But you see, my dear friends, if you take anthroposophy according to its present content and follow it backwards, you will find little earthly preparation. Just go back a little from what appears today as anthroposophy and search impartially, not with your mind clouded by all sorts of philological quibbles, but impartially somewhere for sources for this anthroposophy in the course of this nineteenth century: you will not find them. You will find individual traces of spiritual conception, which could then be used like germs, but germs of a very sparse kind, in the whole structure of anthroposophy; but an actual preparation within the earthly is not present.
[ 20 ] The preparation in the supersensible is all the stronger. And finally, you all know to what extent Goethe's work, even after his death - even if it appears differently in my books - contributed to the shaping of anthroposophy. The most important thing in relation to these things, the most directly important thing, has already taken place in the supersensible. But again, if you trace back the spiritual life of the nineteenth century as vividly as Goethe, Herder, even, for my sake, as far back as Lessing, then that which was at work in individual spirits of the late eighteenth century, of the first half of the nineteenth century, even if it appears in strong abstractions, as in Hegel, for example, or in abstract, pictorial arc, as in Schelling, it nevertheless appears to you to have at least a very strong spiritual touch.
[ 21 ] For I believe that one recognizes in my “Riddles of Philosophy” from the way in which I have described Schelling and Hegel that I nevertheless wanted to point to something in the spiritual-spiritual aspect of this development of the worldview that can then enter into the anthroposophical. In my book “The Riddles of Philosophy” I also tried to grasp these abstractions that appear there, I would like to say, with the mind. I may perhaps refer in particular to the chapter on Hegel, and also to some of what is said about Schelling.
[ 22 ] But you have to go even deeper. Then one finds strange phenomena that appear in the spiritual life of the first half of the nineteenth century and which then only, I would like to say, initially sank into what was the spiritual life, the materialistic life of the second half of the nineteenth century. And yet something appears in all of this in which, even if in abstract terms, there is definitely spirituality, spiritual life and weaving within it.
[ 23 ] The philosopher Schelling is particularly interesting and becomes more interesting the more you read into him. I would say that he begins, almost like Fichte, with pure ideas imbued with will and sharply defined. That is how Fichte appeared. Johann Gottlieb Fichte is one of the few personalities in world history, perhaps unique in his kind in certain respects, a personality who combined the strongest conceptual abstractions at the same time with enthusiasm and energy of will, so that in him we have before us a very interesting phenomenon: The short, stocky Fichte, somewhat retarded in growth by the privations of youth, who, when one looked after him on the street, walked with a tremendously firm step, all will, will that lives itself out in the presentation of the most abstract concepts, but with these most abstract concepts again achieved something like those “speeches to the German nation” that he gave, with which he inspired countless people in a wonderful way.
[ 24 ] Schelling appears almost fictitious, not with such force, but with such a way of thinking. We soon see, however, that Schelling's mind expands. Just as Fichte spoke of ego and non-ego and of all sorts of similar abstract things, Schelling also spoke in his youth, inspiring people in Jena. But he immediately abandons this, the mind expands, and we see mental images entering it, albeit imaginative ones, but again almost aiming at the imagination. It goes on for a while, then he delves into such spirits as Jakob Böhme, describing something that is quite different in tone and style from his earlier work: the foundation of human freedom, a kind of revival of Jakob Böhme's ideas. We then see how Platonism is almost revived in Schelling. He wrote a worldview discussion entitled “Bruno”, which is really reminiscent of Plato's discussions and is very powerful. Another pamphlet, “Clara”, in which the supersensible world plays a major role, is also interesting.
[ 25 ] Then Schelling is silent for an awfully long time. He was regarded by his fellow philosophers, I would say, as a living-dead man and then only published the extraordinarily important work on the Samothracian Mysteries - another expansion of his mind. For the time being, however, he still lived in Munich until the King of Prussia called him to lecture at the University of Berlin on the philosophy that Schelling said he had developed in the silence of his solitude over the decades. And now Schelling appears in Berlin with the philosophy that is then contained in his later works as “Philosophy of Mythology” and “Philosophy of Revelation”. He does not make a great impression on the Berlin audience, because the tenor of what he says in Berlin is actually this: With all his thinking, man gets nowhere at all with regard to worldviews; something must enter the human soul that lives through reflection as the real spiritual world.
[ 26 ] Suddenly, instead of the old rationalistic philosophy, there appears in Schelling a reawakening of the old philosophy of the gods, of mythology, a reawakening of the old gods, and indeed in a completely modern way on the one hand; but from everything one sees: there is an old spirituality at work. It is quite strange.
[ 27 ] What he develops about Christianity in the philosophy of revelation contains significant suggestions, albeit in very abstract forms, for what must be said about some aspects of Christianity within anthroposophy from a spiritual point of view.
[ 28 ] One can certainly not pass over Schelling as easily as the Berliners. One cannot get over him at all! The Berliners passed over him quite easily. When one of Schelling's offspring married the daughter of a Prussian minister - an outwardly connected, if karmically connected, event - a Prussian functionary heard of this fact and said that in the past he had never known why Schelling had actually come to Berlin, but now he knew.
[ 29 ] But you can get into inner difficulties and conflicts if you follow Schelling like this. In addition, this last period of Schelling's life is always portrayed horribly in the histories of philosophy, but everywhere above this chapter is the title: “Schelling's Theosophy”. - Well, it was always the case that I occupied myself a great deal with Schelling. Despite the abstract form, a certain warmth always emanated from what lived in Schelling. For example, when I was relatively young, I spent a lot of time on the Platonic discussion I have just mentioned: “Bruno, or on the Divine and Natural Principle of Things”.
[ 30 ] Schelling, who had been back in the spiritual world since 1854, Schelling actually came very close to you through this conversation “Bruno”, if you read it, lived through it, through his “Clara”, but especially through the writing on the Samothracian Mysteries. It was easy to get close to Schelling in a real, genuine, spiritual way. And then it became completely clear to me at the beginning of the nineties of the last century - it may have been the same with other personalities who worked for the worldview in the first half of the nineteenth century, but with Schelling it was clear - that spiritual inspiration was nevertheless at work. In Schelling, spiritual inspiration was constantly at work.
[ 31 ] And so one could have the following picture: Let us say, first of all, down in the physical world, Schelling, who went through the manifold destinies of his life, who, as I have said, had a long loneliness among these destinies, who was treated in the most varied ways by his fellow men, sometimes with enormous, magnificent enthusiasm, sometimes ridiculed, mocked, this Schelling, who actually always made a significant impression when he appeared in person again, he, the short, stocky man with the tremendously expressive head, the eyes still sparkling and glittering with fire in his later years, from which the fire of truth, the fire of knowledge spoke, this Schelling, you can see quite clearly the more you look at him: he has moments when inspiration falls into him from above.
[ 32 ] I became most aware of this when I read the reviews by Robert Zimmermann - of whom you know that the word “anthroposophy” comes from him, but his anthroposophy is a jumble of concepts - about Schelling's writing on the “World Ages”. I hold Robert Zimmermann in high esteem, but at that time I had to break out inwardly into a sigh: O you Philistine!
[ 33 ] Then I went back to Schelling's writing itself on the ages of the world, which is also written somewhat abstractly, but of which one immediately recognizes: There is something in it like a description of ancient Atlantis in a very spiritual way, distorted in many ways by the abstractions, but there is something in it.
[ 34 ] So you see, there is something everywhere that has such an effect on Schelling that one can say: Schelling is down there, and something is happening up there that affects Schelling. In Schelling it becomes particularly clear that there is actually a continuous interplay between the spiritual world above and the earthly world below in relation to spiritual development. And when, in the middle of the nineties, I was particularly intensively occupied with seeking out the spiritual foundations of the Michael Age and the like, and when I myself entered a phase of life - I can only hint at these things in the “course of life”, but I have already hinted at them - in which I had to strongly experience the world that directly adjoins our sensual-physical world, which is, however, separated from it by a thin wall - in this next world the gigantic facts actually take place, they are not so strongly separated from our world - when I was in Weimar, where on the one hand I experienced the social life of Weimar in all its aspects, but at the same time had the inner necessity to withdraw strongly from everything, so that these things went parallel: It was then that I myself experienced to the highest degree that there was actually always a stronger co-experience of the spiritual world than of the physical world. So that even as a young man it did not become very difficult for me to quickly survey any worldview that entered my sphere; but I had to look at any stone or plant that I was supposed to recognize, not three or four times, but fifty or sixty times - I could not easily connect the soul with that which in the physical world is given names in a physical way.
[ 35 ] That was at its highest at that time, especially during the Weimar period. Weimar at that time, long before the constitutional republican assembly took place there, was really a place like an oasis, like a spiritual oasis, quite different from other places in Germany. It was in this Weimar, as I said in my “Lebensgang”, that I experienced my loneliness. And then, once again, in order to get to the bottom of things, I picked up Schelling's “Gods of Samothrace” and his “Philosophy of Mythology” in 1897 purely for inspiration, not to study inside, but for stimulation, just as one uses external aids. It is not true, let us say, that someone who is researching in the spiritual world wants to make his research easier: they are merely external aids that one has there, just as one has technical aids that are not really connected with the actual matter. If someone wants to research, say, the time of the first Christian centuries, he puts the writings of St. Augustine or Clement of Alexandria under his head for a few nights; that is an external stimulus, like some technical aid for remembering. So at that time I picked up Schelling's “Gods of Samothrace”, the “Philosophy of Mythology”. But what I actually had in mind was that which took place in the course of the nineteenth century in such a way that) it then flowed down, as it were, and could become anthroposophy.
[ 36 ] Then, when I was really able to follow Schelling in his biographical development, but not clearly - this only became clear much, much later, when I wrote my “Riddles of Philosophy” - I was able to perceive - as I said, not quite clearly, how much in Schelling's writings was actually only written down by him under inspiration, and that the inspirer was Julian Apostata-Herzeloyde-Tycho de Brahe, who did not reappear on the physical plane himself, but who had worked tremendously through Schelling's soul. And in the process I realized that this very Tycho de Brahe had progressed in an eminently powerful way after his Tycho de Brahe existence. Only a little could pass through Schelling's corporeality. But once you know that Tycho de Brahe's individuality hovers over Schelling as inspiring, and then you read the flashes of genius in the “Deities of Samothrace”, the flashes of genius especially at the end of the “Philosophy of Revelation”, with Schelling's interpretation of the ancient mysteries, which is magnificent in its way, and especially if you immerse yourself in the language that Schelling uses there, in the language that is so strange, then you soon hear not Schelling speaking, but Tycho de Brahe. And then one becomes aware of how, among other spirits, this very Tycho de Brahe, who was also an individuality in Julian Apostata, has contributed much to the emergence of many things in modern spiritual life, which have nevertheless had such a stimulating effect that at least the external forms of expression for the anthroposophically inspired are sometimes taken from it.
[ 37 ] Then again, one of the writings from German philosophy that has made a great impression on me is the work of Jakob Frohschammer: “Die Phantasie als Grundprinzip des Weltprozesses”, a spiritual writing from the end of the nineteenth century. Spiritual because this courageous man, who was expelled from the church, whose writings were placed on the Index, who was also courageous in the face of science, uncovered the relationship between what is created purely by the soul in the imagination, when man creates artistically, and what works inwardly as growth and vitality. There was already something to this at that time. “The imagination as the basic principle of the world process”, as a world-creating power, is already a significant writing.
[ 38 ] So this Jakob Frohschammer interested me very much. I tried to get to know him, in real terms, not just through his writings. Again I found that the inspiring spirit is the same one that lived in Tycho de Brahe, in Julian Apostata.
[ 39 ] So there is a whole series of personalities in whom one can see how something had a preparatory effect on what then became anthroposophy. But everywhere you need the spiritual light behind it, which works in the supersensible. For what has previously come down to earth has remained abstractions. Only they sometimes become concrete with such a spirit as Schelling or such a courageous man as Jakob Frohschammer.
[ 40 ] And you see, if we look up today to what is actually at work in the supersensible, and know how anthroposophy relates to it, and if we also extend our research into the very concrete, into the concrete spiritual life, then this also serves us quite excellently: There on earth are a number of souls honestly striving towards anthroposophy who have always been close to the Michael currents; there are a number of souls in the supersensible world, namely the teachers of Chartres, who have remained behind. Between those who are here in the sensuous world and those who are above in the spiritual world, there is the most decided tendency to unite their activities with each other.
[ 41 ] And you see, if you now want to have a significant helper for what you are to research for the future of the twentieth century, someone, so to speak, who can advise you with regard to the supersensible world, if you need impulses that are in there, then it is the individuality of Julian ApostataTycho de Brahe. It is not on the physical plan today, but it is actually always there and always provides information about those things that relate specifically to the prophetic in relation to the twentieth century.
[ 42 ] And taking all this together, it turns out that those people who honestly accept anthroposophy today are preparing their souls to reappear at the end of the twentieth century with the shortest possible life between death and new birth, and then also to be united with those teachers of Chartres who have remained behind.
[ 43 ] And that, my dear friends, is something we should take into our souls: this consciousness that the anthroposophical movement in its essentials is called to continue to work, - and to reappear not only in its most significant souls, but in almost all its souls, with the end of the twentieth century, when the great impulse for the spiritual, for the spiritual life on earth is to be given, because otherwise the earth civilization will finally be drawn into its decadence, the characteristics of which it shows so strongly today.
[ 44 ] That is what I would like: out of such substrata to kindle in your hearts, my dear friends, something of the flames which we need to make the spiritual life so strong even now within the anthroposophical movement that we shall appear in the right way prepared when that great epoch appears with which we shall again work on earth after abbreviated supersensible life, when that great epoch appears in which, for the salvation of the earth, that which anthroposophists are capable of is counted upon precisely in its most important members.
[ 45 ] I think that the very prospect of this future can inspire anthroposophists, can lead anthroposophists to evoke in themselves the feelings that will carry them through the present life on earth in a right, energetic, energetic, enthusiastic way, so that this can be a preparation for that at the end of the century when anthroposophy will be called to what is indicated.