Karmic Relationships IV
GA 238
18 September 1924, Dornach
Lecture VII
In the lectures to-day and tomorrow I wish to give certain indications which will throw light, not only on the working of karma, but on the wider importance of karmic knowledge for our general knowledge of the history of evolution, especially in the domain of the spiritual life. We cannot understand the real working of karma if we merely consider the successive earthly lives of any one individuality. Certain it is that within this earthly life, being strongly impressed by the earthly career and history of one man or another, or maybe even of ourselves, we are most keen to know: How do the results of former earthly lives reach over into a later one? But the ways of the working of karma would never become clear to us if we stopped short at the earthly lives themselves. For between one earthly life and another man spends the life between death and a new birth, and it is there that karma is elaborated from what has happened in a former earthly life. There it is elaborated in co-operation with other karmically connected human souls who are also in their life between death and a new birth, and with the Spirits of higher and lower Hierarchies. And this elaboration of karma can only be understood if we can look to the world of stars beyond the earth. For we know that the realm of the stars as it appears to physical sight, reveals only its external aspect.
Again and again we must repeat that the physicist would be in the highest degree astonished if he arrived at the places of the stars which he observes through his telescope, whose constitution and substances he analyses with his spectroscope. The physicist, if he were to go to the places where the stars are, would be astonished to see something totally different from what he would expect. For what the star shows to earthly observation is in reality only an outward semblance, comparatively unessential to its own true being. What the star really contains is of a spiritual nature, or, if physical it appears as the remnant, so to say, of something spiritual.
We can best explain this in the following way. Imagine that an inhabitant of some other star were to observe the Earth in the way our astronomers and astro-physicists observe other stars. He would describe a luminous disc shining far out into the cosmos. On it he would find perhaps darker and lighter spots which he would somehow interpret. Probably the interpretation would altogether disagree with what we who inhabit the globe know amongst ourselves. Or perhaps, if Vesuvius were erupting and such a being could observe it, he would theorise that a comet was colliding with the Earth, and so forth. At any rate, what such a being described would have very little to do with the real essence of our Earth.
For what is the essence of our Earth? You must remember that this Earth has proceeded from the Saturn-existence as I described it in my Occult Science. In Saturn there was as yet no air, no gas, no liquid, no solid earth-constituent. There were only varied differentiations of warmth. But in those warmth-conditions, everything that afterwards became the mineral, plant and animal, and human kingdoms was contained germinally. We human beings, too, were in the warmth of ancient Saturn.
Then evolution went forward. Out of the warmth, air was precipitated, water was precipitated, and at length the solid element. All these are remnants, precipitated, cast out by humanity in order that it might attain its further evolution. The whole solid mineral world belongs to us. It is but a relic that has remained behind. So, too, the watery and airy elements. Thus the real essence of our Earth is not what we have in the kingdoms of Nature, and not even what we carry in our bones and muscles (for these too are composed of what we have thus cast out and afterwards absorbed again). Our own souls are the real essence, and everything else is in reality more or less a semblance, a remnant, a waste product, or the like.
The only true description of the Earth would be to describe it as the colony of the souls of man in cosmic space.
Thus are all the stars colonies of spiritual Beings in cosmic space, colonies which we can learn to know as such. And having passed through the gate of death, our own soul lives and moves among these starry colonies. It goes on its further journey, evolving towards a new birth in community with other human souls that are there, and with the Beings of higher or even of lower Hierarchies. And when a man's karma is elaborated and he is ripe to take on an earthly body once again, his soul starts on the returning journey.
To understand karma, therefore, we must return once more to a wisdom of the stars. We must discover spiritually the paths of man between death and a new birth in connection with the Beings of the stars.
Now until the beginning of the age of Michael there have been the greatest difficulties for the men of modern time to approach a real wisdom of the stars. And Anthroposophy, having nevertheless found its way to such a wisdom, must be deeply thankful for the fact that the dominion of Michael really did enter the life of Earth-humanity with the last third of the 19th century. For among many things that we owe to the dominion of Michael there is this too: we have gained once more unhindered access to discover what must be investigated in the worlds of the stars if we would understand karma and the forming of karma in the sphere of humanity.
To introduce you gradually into the extremely difficult questions that arise in the investigation of karma, I will give you an example to-day. It will show you by an illustration how much must be achieved before we can speak of the working of karma as we are doing in these lectures.
It is true enough, is it not, that if we were to speak popularly or in public of the content of these lectures nowadays, these things which are truly an outcome of exact research would be treated as an absurdity. Nevertheless it is a most exact research and you must make yourselves acquainted with all the responsibilities of which one becomes aware in the course of it. You must learn to know all the obstacles and difficulties one meets in such research—the thorny hedges, as it were, which one must pass. For all these things are necessary in order that at length a number of human beings, united karmically in the community of Michael, can learn to know the things of karma. You must know that these are questions of the most earnest spiritual research, far removed from what is imagined by the layman who stands outside this Anthroposophical Movement.
Most of you will remember a character who occurs again and again in my Mystery Plays—the character of Strader. I have already to some extent spoken of these things. The character of Strader is partly drawn from life, in so far as that is possible in a poetic work. I had a kind of pattern for the personality of Strader. It was a man who lived through the developments of the last third of the 19th century and came to a kind of rationalistic Christianity. After an extremely difficult period of youth (as is suggested in the description of Strader) this man became a Capuchin monk, but he could not bear it in the Church, and at length became a professor.
Having been driven from theology into philosophy, he wrote and spoke with great enthusiasm of Lessing's “free-thinking religion” if one may so describe it. Having come into an inner conflict with official Christianity, he then wanted to found a sort of rationalistic Christianity on a basis of reason and in a quite conscious way. The soul-conflicts of Strader as described in my Mystery Plays did indeed take place in the real life of this man, though of course with certain variations.
Now you know that in the last Mystery Play, Strader dies. I myself, if I now look back and see how I wove the character of Strader into the plot of the four Mystery Plays, must see that though there was no external difficulty in letting him live on just like the other characters, he dies out of an inner necessity at a certain moment. One may well feel his death as a surprise when reading through the plays. But I had the strong inner feeling that I could no longer continue the character of Strader in the plays.
Why was it so? You see, in the meantime the original, the model, if I may call him so, had died. Now having based the character of Strader on him, you may well imagine how deeply interested I was in the original, in his further course of evolution. He continued to interest me when he had passed through the gate of death.
Now it is a peculiar thing when we wish to follow the life of a human being clairvoyantly through the time directly after death, through the period that lasts about a third of the physical life on earth. The earthly life, as we know, is in a certain way gone through again backward, at a threefold speed. Now what is the human being really experiencing in these decades that immediately follow his earthly life?
Imagine a human life here upon earth. We know how it falls into day and night—alternating conditions of waking and sleeping. Already in the periods of sleep man experiences reminiscences of the day-waking life pictorially, but he is not conscious. Ordinarily when we look back upon our life we remember only the day-waking states. Nor do we bear in mind what the chain of memories is really like, for in reality we should say: I remember that day from morning till evening, then there is a break, then again from morning till evening, then again a break and so on. But, as the nights are an empty void in our memory, we draw the line continuously through and thus falsify the chain of memory by placing one day directly after another. After death it is different, for then we must live with intense reality through all the experiences that were present in the nights of our life, comprising about a third of the length of our life. We live through it backwards. Now this is the peculiar thing—we have, as you know, a certain sense of reality, a certain feeling of real existence with regard to the things we meet with here in the physical world. If we had not this sense of reality we could consider as a dream all the things we meet with, even in the daytime. Thus we undoubtedly have a sense of the reality of things. We know that they are real; they hit us if we knock against them; they send us light and sound. In short, there are many things that give us our sense of reality here in this earthly life between birth and death.
Now all that we have here on earth as feeling of reality, all that we should describe as the reality—the real existence—of human beings whom we meet here, is in its intensity like the reality of a dream compared to the immensely strong reality which we experience in the decades immediately after death and which the clairvoyant observer can experience with us. For there, everything seems to us more real. The earthly life seems like a dream. It is as though the soul were only then awakening into the real intensity of life.—That is the peculiar thing.
Now as I followed the image of Strader (or of his counterpart) after his passage through the gate of death, the real individuality living after death naturally interested me far more than the reminiscence of his earthly life. For the earthly seems like a dream compared to what emerges after death. Faced with the strong impressions of the dead I could no longer have evolved sufficient interest in the living man to describe his life. In this case I speak out of my own experience. How weak is the reality of earthly life compared with that intensest life which meets us when we follow a man after his death!
When our interest has been kindled on the earth and we try to follow the life of a man in his further course after death, we begin to realise the tremendous difficulties and hindrances. For if we observe rightly and penetratingly, we see, already in that backward course which takes about a third of the time of the past earthly life, how the dead man begins to approach and prepare for the forming of his karma. In a reverse and backward life, he sees all that he underwent during his life on earth. If he offended another man he experiences the event again. If I die at the age of seventy-three, and at the age of sixty I offended someone, I experience it again on the backward journey. But this time I experience, not the feelings which I had in giving the offence, but the feelings of the other man. I live right over into him. Thus I with my own experience live in those who were touched in a good or in a bad sense by these my experiences in life. And thus the tendency is prepared and grows in me myself, to create the karmic balance.
Now my interest in the earthly archetype of Strader who now appeared before me as an individuality in higher worlds—my interest in him had been kindled especially by his desire to take hold of Christianity in a very penetrating, in a very brilliant, but rationalistic way. In his case we cannot but admire the thinker, and yet in the books he wrote, in his rationalistic description of Christianity, we see again and again how the thread of rationalism, the thread of abstract concepts breaks at the critical moment, and in the last resort appalling abstractions are the outcome. He cannot really enter a spiritual conception of Christianity. He builds up a religion of abstract philosophical concepts for himself. In short, the whole workings of modern intellectualism find expression in him.
This again appeared in a peculiar way as one followed his path of life after his death. Ordinarily, when there are no special difficulties, we find the human being living gradually into the sphere of the Moon, for that is the first station of the life after death. When we arrive after death in the Moon-region, we find all those whom we might call the “Registrars” of our destiny, who in primeval time were the wise Teachers of humanity. How often we have spoken of them here! As the Moon separated physically from the Earth, and, having been a part of earthly substance, became a heavenly body by itself, so the primeval Teachers of mankind afterwards followed the Moon, and we to-day, when as dead men we pass the region of the Moon, find the great primeval Teachers of mankind. They were not here in physical bodies, but they founded the primeval wisdom of which the traditions of sacred literature are but an echo.
Unhindered, if there are no special hindrances, we find our way after death into that region of the Moon. Now with the human being who was the archetype of Strader, something peculiar occurred. It was as though he was simply unable to approach the Moon-region unhindered and undergo that life of soul which follows directly after death. There were perpetual hindrances, as though the Moon-region simply would not let this individuality approach it.
Then if one followed the real events and causes in pictorial Imagination, the following appeared.—It was as though the Spirits, the primeval Teachers of mankind who had once brought to humanity the original and spiritual wisdom, called out again and again to this human being, the archetype of Strader: “Thou canst not come to us, for owing to thy special qualities as man thou mayst not know anything as yet about the stars. Thou must wait, and first repeat and recapitulate many things that thou didst undergo not only in thy last, but in thy former incarnations. Thou mayst not know anything at all of the stars and their real being, till thou hast thus prepared thyself.”—It was a strange scene. One had before one an individuality who simply could not grow out towards the spiritual of the world of stars—or could only do so with the greatest difficulty. And in this case I made the strange discovery that these modern individualities of the rationalistic, intellectualistic mind, find the great hindrance in the shaping of their karma, inasmuch as they cannot approach unhindered the spiritual being of the stars.
On further investigation it appeared that this personality had drawn all the forces of his rationalism from the time that still preceded the dawn of the Age of Michael. He was not yet really touched by the dominion of Michael.
In this case I felt strongly called upon to follow the individual karma farther into the past. It was a real challenge. For I said to myself: something is here, which, working from the results of former lives on earth, has prepared this human being karmically, so that the karma works itself out not only in this earthly life, but extends even into the life after his death. It is indeed a strange phenomenon.
Then the following appeared. The earthly life which I have indicated in bare outline, which is reflected in the character of Strader, this earthly life of the individuality was preceded by a life in spiritual worlds which I can only describe as a sore and grievous trial. It was a trial in the spiritual worlds: “What shall I do with Christianity?” It was like a slow preparation of the influences which then made him insecure in earthly life in his conception of Christianity. This too shines through in the figure of Strader. He is in no way certain. He rejects the super-sensible in a way; he tries only to take hold of it with intellect, and yet after all he wants to see. Call to mind the character of Strader, and you will find it so. Thus the real life of the archetype of Strader grew out of his former karma. In effect, in his passage through the life between death and a new birth, before his earthly life at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century, he had passed through the world of the stars in a very dim and darkened consciousness. His consciousness was darkened as he went through that life between death and a new birth. And as a reaction, in his life on earth he conceived concepts the more clear and sharply outlined for the bluntness of the conceptual pictures he had experienced between death and a new birth.
We go backward still—beyond these phenomena which seemed to show the starry worlds as though in a perpetual fog—backward to his former life on earth, and there we find the most remarkable thing of all. We are led to begin with, or at least I was led, to the Battle of the Minstrels in the Wartburg, A.D. 1206. It was the very time of which I told you how the old Platonists from the School of Chartres, for instance, had gone up into the spiritual worlds and the others had not yet descended. It was the time when a kind of heavenly conference took place between the two groups of souls as to the further progress of the activities of Michael. In that time there took place the Battle of the Minstrels in the Wartburg.
It is ever interesting to observe: What is happening here on earth and what is happening yonder? Thus we have an event on earth in the Battle of the Minstrels on the Wartburg, not directly connected with the continued stream of Michael.
Now who was there in the Battle of the Minstrels? The greatest German poets were there together, vying one with another in their song. The story is well known—how the Minstrels fought for the fame of princes and for their own repute: Walther von der Vogelweide, Wolfram von Eschenbach, Reinmar von Zweter, and how there was one who stood against all the others—Heinrich von Ofterdingen.
In this Heinrich von Ofterdingen I found the individuality that underlay the archetype of Strader.
Thus it was Heinrich von Ofterdingen. Now we must concentrate on this: Why did Heinrich von Ofterdingen meet with such difficulties when he had passed through the gate of death? Why did he have to go through the world of stars, as it were, darkened and befogged?
To answer this we must return to the story of the Battle of the Minstrels. Heinrich von Ofterdingen takes up the fight against the others. They have already called the hangman. He is to be hanged if he loses. He manages to withdraw; but, hoping to bring about a renewed contest, he summons the magician Klingsor from the land of Hungary. He did, in effect, bring the magician Klingsor from Hungary to Eisenach. A new Battle of the Wartburg ensues and Klingsor enters the lists for Heinrich von Ofterdingen. Klingsor himself sings against the others, but it is quite evident that he is not battling alone. He causes spiritual beings to battle with him. For instance, in order to do so, he makes a youth become possessed by a spiritual being—and then compels the youth to sing in his place. He calls still stronger spiritual forces into play in the Wartburg.
Over against all that comes from Klingsor's side stands Wolfram von Eschenbach. One of Klingsor's practices is to make one of his spiritual beings put Wolfram to the test, as to whether he is really a learned man. For Klingsor finds himself driven into a corner by Wolfram. In effect, Wolfram von Eschenbach, observing that some spiritual influence is at work, sings of the Holy Communion, the Transubstantiation, the Presence of Christ in the Eucharist, and the spirit is obliged to depart, for he cannot bear it. There are indeed “real realities” underlying these things, if I may use the tautology.
Klingsor puts Wolfram to the test, and succeeds indeed, with the help of the spiritual being, in proving that Wolfram (though indeed he has a star-less Christianity, a Christianity that no longer reckons with the cosmos) is quite unlearned in all cosmic wisdom. This now is the point. Klingsor has proved that the Minstrel of the Holy Grail, even in his time, knows only that Christianity which has eliminated the Cosmic Christianity. Klingsor himself, on the other hand, is only able to appear with the support of spiritual beings, inasmuch as he possesses a wisdom of the stars. But we recognise, from the way he uses his wisdom, that what is called “Black Magic” is indeed mingled in his arts.
In a word, we see Wolfram von Eschenbach, who is a stranger to the stars, encountered by a wisdom of the stars unrighteously applied.
This was in the 13th century, immediately preceding the appearance of those Dominicans of whom I told you. It was at the very time when Christianity, just where it was greatest, had divested itself of all insight into the world of stars. Indeed at that time the wisdom of the stars only existed in quarters that were inwardly estranged from Christianity, as was the case with Klingsor of Hungary.
Now it was Heinrich von Ofterdingen who had summoned Klingsor. Heinrich von Ofterdingen, therefore, had allied himself with an unchristian wisdom of the stars. And thus Heinrich remained united in a certain way, not merely with the personality of Klingsor (who in fact afterwards vanished from Heinrich's life in the super-sensible) but with the unchristian cosmology of the Middle Ages. In this way he lived on between death and a new birth, and was reborn as I described it to you. He came into an uncertainty of Christianity.
But the most important thing is this.—He dies again and enters on the returning journey of his life. And in the world of souls, at every step he stands face to face with the necessity, if ever he is to approach the world of stars again, to pass through the grievous battle which Michael had to wage in the last third of the 19th century when he claimed his dominion especially against those demonic powers which were connected with the unchristian cosmology of the Middle Ages.
To complete the picture, I will add that it is clearly possible to see among those who fought hard against the dominion of Michael, and against whom the spirits of Michael had to proceed—it is clearly possible to see among them to this day, the very spirit-beings whom Klingsor conjured up in the Wartburg long ago against Wolfram von Eschenbach.
Thus we see a man whose other results of past karma even led him for a time into the services of the Capuchin Order, unable to come near to real Christianity. He could not come to it because he bore within him the antagonism to Christianity which he had raised in his past life,when he summoned Klingsor to his aid from the land of Hungary, against Wolfram von Eschenbach, the singer of Parsifal. Darkly in the unconscious life of this man the unchristian cosmology still showed itself, but in his ordinary consciousness he evolved a rationalistic Christianity which is not even very interesting. For the interest attaches more to the great conflict of his life, when with a Christian rationalism he tried to found a kind of rationalistic religion.
But it is most significant of all to recognise this connection of abstract rationalism, abstractly clever thinking, with that which lives in the subconscious as darkened, veiled conceptions about the stars and relationships to the stars. Such things, living in the subconscious, rise into consciousness as abstract thoughts. We can study the karma of the cleverest men of the present day—cleverest in the materialist sense—and we find that as a rule in former earthly lives they had something to do with cosmological aberrations into the realms of black magic. This is a very significant connection. An instinctive feeling of it is preserved in the peasants and country folk, who feel a certain aversion from the outset when they find among them someone who is all too clever in a rationalistic sense. They do not like him. In their instinctive conception of him there is something which, if we follow it up, leads eventually to such connections.
Now I want you to consider all these things in relation to our main subject. Such human spirits one could meet with in the last third of the 19th century and in the beginning of the 20th. They are among the most interesting. A reborn Heinrich von Ofterdingen, who had to do with the blackest magician of his time, with Klingsor, proves indeed most interesting in his present-day rationalistic intellect.
We see here how great the difficulties are when one wishes to approach the wisdom of the stars rightly and righteously. Indeed the true approach to the wisdom of the stars, which we need to penetrate the facts of karma, is only possible in the light of a true insight into Michael's dominion. It is only possible at Michael's side.
I have shown you a single example to-day—the example of him who was the archetype of Strader. It will show you once more, how through the whole reality of modern time there has come forth a certain stream of spiritual life which makes it very difficult to approach with an open mind the science of the stars, and the science, too, of karma. But difficult as it is, it can be done. Despite the attacks that are possible from those quarters which I have described to-day, we can nevertheless go forward with assurance, and approach the wisdom of the stars and the real shaping of karma. As to how these things are possible, I will tell you more tomorrow.
Siebenter Vortrag
[ 1 ] Den heutigen und den morgigen Vortrag möchte ich so gestalten, daß sich daraus einige Richtlinien ergeben können, um die Wirkung des Karma auf der einen Seite, aber auch die Bedeutung von Erkenntnissen, die sich auf das Karma von Menschen beziehen, für die allgemeine Entwickelungsgeschichte namentlich des geistigen Lebens, etwas zu beleuchten. Wir können Karma in seiner Wirksamkeit nicht verstehen, wenn wir nur auf die aufeinanderfolgenden Erdenleben irgendeiner Individualität hinblicken. Es ist ja so, daß man gewiß innerhalb des Erdenlebens, wo einem in starker Beleuchtung die irdische Laufbahn dieses oder jenes Menschen oder seine eigene entgegentritt, sich vor allen Dingen tief interessiert für die Frage: Wie reichen die Ergebnisse vorangegangener Erdenleben in spätere hinüber? — Aber erklärlich würde diese Wirkungsweise niemals werden, wenn man bei den Erdenleben stehenbleiben müßte, denn der Mensch verlebt ja zwischen den Erdenleben das Leben zwischen Tod und neuer Geburt. Und in diesem Leben zwischen Tod und neuer Geburt wird ja das eigentliche Karma ausgearbeitet aus dem, was in einem Erdenleben sich ereignet im Zusammenhange mit anderen Menschenseelen, die entkörpert sind, die karmisch mit ihnen verbunden sind, die auch in dem Leben zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt sind, und im Zusammenhange mit Geistern der höheren Hierarchien, auch wohl mit Geistern niederer Hierarchien. Und dieses Karma in seiner Ausarbeitung wird nur verständlich, wenn man zu dem außerirdischen Sternenwesen hinschauen kann, das ja in der Art, wie es dem physischen Auge erscheint, nur seine Außenseite zeigt.
[ 2 ] Man muß immer wieder sagen: Die Physiker würden in hohem Grade erstaunt sein, wenn sie an Orte kommen würden, wo die Sterne sind, die sie durch ihre Teleskope betrachten, die in den Spektroskopen analysiert werden in bezug auf ihre Substanzen, ja ihre Konstitution. Erstaunt wären diese Physiker, wenn sie hinaufkämen an die Orte, wo diese Sterne sind, die sie durch ihre Teleskope betrachten, und nun sehen würden, daß sie gar nicht das da antreffen, was sie erwarten! Das, was ein Stern der Beobachtung der Erde zeigt, ist ja eigentlich nur ein für sein eigenes Dasein ziemlich wesenloses Nach-außen-Scheinen; während dasjenige, was der Stern enthält, geistiger Art ist, oder wenn es physischer Art ist, sich als Rest, möchte man sagen, eines Geistigen zeigt.
[ 3 ] Sie können sich, meine lieben Freunde, am besten in der folgenden Art klarmachen, was da vorliegt. Bedenken Sie einmal, irgendein Bewohner eines anderen Sternes würde in ähnlicher Weise die Erde beobachten, wie bei uns Astronomen und Astrophysiker andere Sterne beobachten: er würde eine Scheibe beschreiben, die in das Weltenall hinausglimmt, leuchtet, bei der er vielleicht dunkle und helle Flecken finden würde, die er irgendwie deuten würde. Wahrscheinlich würde die Deutung mit dem nicht stimmen, was wir Erdenbewohner unter uns wissen. Vielleicht, wenn der Vesuv Feuer speit und man das beobachten könnte, würde er davon reden, daß da von außen Kometen anfliegen und dergleichen. Jedenfalls würde dasjenige, was ein solcher Astronom beschreiben würde, recht wenig zu tun haben mit dem, was Wesenhaftes eigentlich unsere Erde bildet.
[ 4 ] Und was bildet denn Wesenhaftes unsere Erde? Denken Sie nur einmal: Unsere Erde ist aus demjenigen hervorgegangen, was ich in meiner «Geheimwissenschaft» als Saturndasein geschildert habe. Da gab es noch keine Luft, keine Gase, keine Flüssigkeit, keine festen Erdenbestandteile, da gab es nur Wärmedifferenzierungen. Und in dieser Wärmedifferenzierung war alles keimhaft darinnen, was später mineralisches, pflanzliches, tierisches Reich geworden ist, auch menschliches Reich. Wir Menschen waren auch noch in diesem Saturn drinnen, in dieser Wärme.
[ 5 ] Dann hat sich das weiterentwickelt: Die Luft wurde abgesetzt aus der Wärme heraus, Wasser wurde abgesetzt, das Feste wurde abgesetzt; es sind lauter Reste, die abgesetzt wurden, die da von den Menschen herausgeworfen wurden, um ihre Bildung zu erreichen. Alles, was mineralisch Festes ist, gehört ja zu uns, ist ja nur zurückgebliebener Rest, ebenso das Wässerige, ebenso das Luftförmige. So daß das Wesentliche auf unserer Erde nicht dasjenige ist, was in den Reichen der Natur da ist, auch nicht dasjenige, was wir in den Knochen und in den Muskeln tragen, denn diese sind wieder zusammengesetzt aus dem, was also abgeschieden ist und was wir wieder hereingenommen haben; sondern das Wesentliche sind unsere Seelen. Und das andere ist im Grunde genommen alles mehr oder weniger Schein oder Restprodukt und dergleichen.
[ 6 ] Wahrhaftig würde man die Erde nur dann beschreiben, wenn man sie als die Kolonie der Menschenseelen im Weltenraum beschriebe. Und so sind alle Sterne Kolonien von Geistwesen im Weltenraum, Kolonien, die man kennenlernen kann. Unsere eigene Seele, indem sie durch die Pforte des Todes gegangen ist, bewegt sich durch diese Sternenkolonien hindurch, macht ihren weiteren Weg der Entwickelung durch bis zu einer neuen Geburt in Gemeinschaft mit jenen Seelen, die dort schon sind als Menschenseelen, in Gemeinschaft mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien oder auch niederer Hierarchien, und kommt dann, entsprechend dem, wie Karma ausgearbeitet ist, wie der Mensch reif geworden ist, wiederum zurück, um einen Erdenleib anzunehmen. So daß wir also, wenn wir Karma verstehen wollen, wiederum zu einer Sternenweisheit, zu einem spirituellen Untersuchen des Menschenweges zwischen Tod und neuer Geburt in Verbindung mit den Sternenwesen kommen müssen.
[ 7 ] Nun gibt es aber gerade bis in den Anbruch der Michael-Herrschaft herein für die Menschen der neueren Zeit große Schwierigkeiten, an eine wirkliche Sternenweisheit heranzukommen. Und indem die Anthroposophie dennoch herankommen mußte an diese Sternenweisheit, weiß sie dankbar zu sein dem Umstande, daß eben die Michael-Herrschaft mit dem letzten Drittel des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts über das Geschehen der Erdenmenschheit hereingebrochen ist. Und unter den mancherlei Dingen, die der MichaelHerrschaft zu verdanken sind, ist eben dieses, daß wir wieder einen ungehinderten Zugang zu der Untersuchung desjenigen gewonnen haben, was in den Welten der Sterne untersucht werden muß, damit wir das Karma, die Karmabildung im Menschheitlichen verstehen können.
[ 8 ] Ich möchte Ihnen das an einem Beispiel heute zeigen, um Sie langsam in die außerordentlich schwierigen Fragen hereinzuführen, die sich an die Untersuchung über Karma knüpfen. Ich möchte Ihnen ein Beispiel vorführen, an dem Sie gewissermaßen illustrativ ersehen können, was alles zu geschehen hat, bevor man in einer solchen Weise über das Karmawirken sprechen kann, wie das jetzt in diesem Vortrage geschieht. Denn, nicht wahr, man weiß doch: Wenn von dem Inhalt dieser Vorträge irgendwie in der Öffentlichkeit, in der gewöhnlichen populären Öffentlichkeit heute gesprochen würde, so würde man ja das, was ganz exakte Forschung ist, für eine Torheit, für eine Narrheit ansehen. Aber es ist das eben ganz exakte Forschung, und Sie müssen schon bekannt werden mit all den Verantwortlichkeiten, deren man sich bei einer solchen Forschung bewußt wird, müssen bekannt werden mit all demjenigen, was einer solchen Forschung entgegensteht, welche, sozusagen, «Dornenhecken» man zu passieren hat bei einer solchen Forschung. Denn es ist notwendig, daß eine Anzahl von Menschen sie wissen können mit all jenen karmischen Eigentümlichkeiten der Michael-Zusammengehörigkeit, von der ich gesprochen habe; wissen eben, daß es sich bei diesen Dingen um ernste geistige Forschung handelt und nicht um dasjenige, was heute der Unkundige, der außerhalb der anthroposophischen Bewegung steht, über solche Dinge denkt.
[ 9 ] Die meisten von Ihnen, meine lieben Freunde — ich habe ja die Tatsache zum Teil schon erwähnt —, werden sich einer Gestalt erinnern, die in meinen Mysterien immer und immer wiederum auftritt: der Gestalt des Strader.
[ 10 ] Diese Gestalt des Strader ist, insofern das bei einer Dichtung der Fall sein kann, in einem gewissen Sinne nach dem Leben gezeichnet. Ich habe das schon vor einigen von Ihnen hier erwähnt. Und die Persönlichkeit des Strader hat eine Art von Vorbild gehabt, das die Entwickelung des letzten Drittels des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts miterlebt hat und in gewissem Sinne zu einer Art von rationalistischem Christentum gekommen ist. Eine Persönlichkeit, welche nach einer außerordentlich schwierigen Jugend — bei der Darstellung des Strader schimmert so etwas davon durch — Kapuziner geworden ist, aber es innerhalb der Kirche nicht aushalten konnte und den Weg dann fand zum Professorenamt.
[ 11 ] Diese Persönlichkeit war dann, als sie aus der Theologie hinein in die Philosophie getrieben worden war, begeisterter Schilderer von Lessings freigeistiger Religion geworden. Die Persönlichkeit war dann so, daß sie in eine Art innerlichen Konfliktes gekommen ist mit dem offiziellen Christentum, und aus der Vernunft heraus eine Art rationalistisches Christentum begründen wollte, ziemlich bewußt. Und die Seelenkämpfe, die man bei Strader in meinen Mysteriendramen findet, spielten sich schon mit einer gewissen Variante bei dieser Persönlichkeit im Leben ab.
[ 12 ] Nun wissen Sie ja, daß in meinem letzten Mysteriendrama die Persönlichkeit des Strader stirbt. Und wenn ich selber zurückblicke auf die Art und Weise, wie sich mir Straders Persönlichkeit in das Ganze meiner Mysteriendramen hineinverwoben hat, dann muß ich sagen: Trotzdem ja gar kein äußerliches Hindernis gewesen wäre, auch den Strader noch weiterleben zu lassen, wie die anderen weiter leben, — er stirbt aus einer inneren Notwendigkeit heraus! So daß es sogar möglich ist, den Tod Straders als eine Überraschung im Mysteriendrama zu sehen. Es stirbt Strader in einem gewissen Momente: Ich hatte das Gefühl, ich könnte den Strader nicht weiter behandeln in den Mysteriendramen.
[ 13 ] Warum das? Ja, sehen Sie, meine lieben Freunde, mittlerweile ist, wenn ich es so nennen darf, das Original gestorben. Und Sie können sich denken, wie tief dieses Original mich interessiert hat in seinem Entwickelungsgange, da ich gerade die Gestalt des Strader entworfen hatte. Dieses Original interessiert mich weiter, auch nachdem es durch die Pforte des Todes gegangen war.
[ 14 ] Aber nun besteht da eine gewisse Eigentümlichkeit. Wenn wir gerade veranlaßt sind, mit dem schauenden Auge eine Persönlichkeit zu verfolgen in der Zeit, die auf den Tod folgt, die ein Drittel ungefähr des physischen Erdenlebens dauert — das Erdenleben wird ja im rückwärtigen Gang in einer gewissen Weise wiederholt, aber mit dreifacher Schnelligkeit —, was erlebt denn der Mensch eigentlich da in den Jahrzehnten, die unmittelbar an das Erdenleben angrenzen?
[ 15 ] Wenn Sie sich ein Menschenleben hier auf Erden vorstellen, so zerfällt es in Tage und Nächte, Wachzustände, Schlafzustände. In den Schlafzuständen sind immer schon bildhaft Reminiszenzen an das Tagesleben. Wenn man so zurückblickt auf das Leben, erinnert man sich gewöhnlich ja nur der Tageszustände, der Wachzustände, man gibt gar nicht acht; denn man müßte eigentlich die Erinnetungen so gestalten: Da erinnere ich mich vom Morgen bis zum Abend, jetzt bricht’s ab, vom Morgen bis zum Abend — bricht wieder ab, vom Morgen bis zum Abend — bricht wieder ab.
[ 16 ] Aber weil da in der Nacht nichts drinnen ist in der Erinnerung, ziehen wir die Linie einfach glattweg durch und fälschen unsere Erinnerungen, indem wir nur die Tage aneinandersetzen. Aber nach dem Tode müssen wir dasjenige in starker Realität durchleben, was in den Nächten, während des dritten Teils des Lebens ungefähr, vorhanden war, und zwar rückwärts durchleben. Und da ist das Eigentümliche eben: Man hat ja ein gewisses Seinsgefühl, möchte ich sagen, ein Wirklichkeitsgefühl von dem, was einem auf Erden entgegentritt. Würde man dieses Wirklichkeitsgefühl nicht haben, so würde man ja alles, was einem bei Tag begegnet, auch für Träume halten können. Man hat also ein gewisses Wirklichkeitsgefühl. Man weiß, die Dinge sind wirklich, sie stoßen einen, wenn man an sie anstößt, sie senden einem Licht zu, senden Töne zu. Kurz, es gibt vieles, was veranlaßt, daß wir ein Wirklichkeitsgefühl haben hier während unseres Erdenlebens zwischen Geburt und Tod.
[ 17 ] Aber wenn man all das nimmt, was wir hier als Wirklichkeitsgefühl haben, wenn Sie, meine lieben Freunde, all das nehmen, was Sie als Wirklichkeit der Menschen bezeichnen, denen Sie hier begegnen, so ist alles das in seiner Intensität wie Traumwirklichkeit gegenüber der ungeheuer intensiven Wirklichkeit, die man in diesen Jahrzehnten unmittelbar nach dem Tode erlebt und die der Betrachter miterlebt. All das erscheint einem viel realer, das Erdenleben erscheint einem so, als ob es ein Traum wäre, es ist, als ob eigentlich die Seele jetzt erst aufwachte in bezug auf die Intensität des Lebens. Das ist das Eigentümliche.
[ 18 ] Und als ich dieses Vorbild des Strader verfolgte, nahm mich natürlich das Wirkliche, die wirkliche Individualität, die da lebte nach dem Tode, viel mehr in Anspruch als die Erinnerung an das Erdenleben, das ja gegen das, was da im Tode auftritt, wie im Traum erscheint. So daß ich gegenüber den starken Eindrücken des Toten nicht mehr das Interesse für den Lebenden hätte entwickeln können, um es zu beschreiben.
[ 19 ] Ich kann also hier aus der eigenen Erfahrung heraus sprechen, wie wenig intensiv das Erdenleben ist gegenüber dem Leben, das einem da entgegentritt, wenn man den Menschen verfolgt nach dem Tode, und das intensivstes Leben ist. Und wenn man nun, gerade da, wo durch das angefachte Erdeninteresse dieses besondere Interesse erregt ist für das Leben nach dem Tode, aufmerksam zu verfolgen versucht, wie das nun weitergeht, dann merkt man die sich entgegensetzenden Schwierigkeiten. Denn wenn man ganz tichtig beobachtet, eindringlich beobachtet, so sieht man, wie in diesem Rückwärtsleben nach dem Tode, das ungefähr ein Drittel der Lebenszeit in Anspruch nimmt, sich bereits zeigt, daß der Tote an seine Karmabildung vorbereitend heranwill. Er sieht ja alles dasjenige, was er durchgemacht hat während des Lebens, bei diesem umgekehrten, bei diesem Zurück-Erleben. Wenn er einen Menschen beleidigt hat, erlebt er das wiederum. Sterbe ich als Dreiundsiebzigjähriger und habe in meinem sechzigsten Lebensjahr jemand beleidigt, so erlebe ich das im Rückwärtswandern wieder; aber ich erlebe es so, daß ich nicht die Gefühle erlebe, die ich beim Beleidigen gehabt habe, sondern die Gefühle, die der andere über mein Beleidigen gehabt hat. Ich lebe mich ganz in den anderen hinüber. Und so lebe ich eigentlich mit meinen eigenen Erlebnissen in denjenigen Menschen, die von diesen Erlebnissen berührt worden sind im guten oder bösen Sinn. Und da bereitet sich dann bei einem selber die Tendenz vor, den karmischen Ausgleich zu schaffen.
[ 20 ] Nun war das Interesse, das ich an diesem irdischen Vorbilde des Strader hatte, das mir jetzt als eine übersinnliche Individualität gegenübertrat, namentlich dadurch angefacht, daß dieses Vorbild wirklich in einer eindringlich scharfsinnig rationalistischen Weise das Christentum erfassen wollte. Man bewundert dabei den Denker; aber man merkt überall bei dieser rationalistischen Darstellung des Christentums in den Büchern jenes Menschen, die er auf Erden geschrieben hat, wie der Faden des Rationalismus, der Faden der Begriffe abreißt, wie im Grunde doch etwas furchtbar Abstraktes dabei herauskommt, wie der Betreffende nicht hineinkommen kann in ein spirituelles Erfassen des Christentums, wie er mit philosophischen Begriffen eine Art Begriffsreligion sich zusammenzimmert und so weiter. Kurz, die ganze Schwäche des Intellektualismus moderner Zeit tritt bei dieser Persönlichkeit auf.
[ 21 ] Das wiederum zeigt sich in einer merkwürdigen Weise beim Verfolgen seines Lebensweges nach dem Tode zurück. Man findet bei Menschen, bei denen nicht solche Schwierigkeiten auftreten, daß sie sich nun allmählich hineinleben in die Sphäre des Mondes. Das ist die erste Station. Und wenn wir als Tote in die Mondenregion kommen, finden wir ja dort alle diejenigen, ich möchte sagen, «Registratoren» unseres Schicksals, welche einmal die weisen. Lehrer der Menschen in Urzeiten waren, von denen man oft hier gesprochen hat und die, als der Mond physisch sich von der Erde getrennt hat und aus einem Erdeninhalte ein eigener Weltkörper geworden ist, dann diesem Monde gefolgt sind. So daß wir heute, wenn wir die Mondenregion als Tote passieren, zunächst die großen Urlehrer der Menschheit antreffen, die nicht im physischen Leibe da waren, die aber die Urweisheit begründet haben, von der nur ein Abglanz vorhanden ist in demjenigen, was literarisch überliefert ist. Wir finden uns, wenn eben keine Hemmnisse eintreten, sozusagen ungehindert auf dem Wege in diese Mondenregion hinein.
[ 22 ] Bei der Persönlichkeit, die das Urbild des Strader ist, trat etwas auf, wie wenn sie überhaupt nicht in der Lage wäre, ungehindert dieses unmittelbar auf den Tod folgende seelische Leben gegen die Mondenregion durchzumachen: fortwährend Hindernisse, wie wenn die Mondenregion diese Individualität nicht herankommen lassen wollte.
[ 23 ] Und wenn man in bildhafter Imagination verfolgte, was da eigentlich war, dann zeigte sich das Folgende: Es war, wie wenn die Geister, also die Urlehrer der Menschheit, die einmal die ursprüngliche spirituelle Wissenschaft der Menschheit gebracht haben, wie wenn diese Urlehrer der Menschheit immer diesem Urbilde des Strader entgegenrufen würden: Du kannst nicht zu uns, denn du darfst deiner besonderen menschlichen Qualität wegen noch nichts wissen von den Sternen; du mußt warten, du mußt Verschiedenes erst dir wiederholen von dem, was du nicht bloß in der letzten, sondern in den früheren Inkarnationen durchgemacht hast, damit du reif wirst, überhaupt irgend etwas wissen zu dürfen von den Sternen und ihrer Wesenheit.
[ 24 ] Und da trat dieses Merkwürdige auf, daß man eine Individualität vor sich hatte, die dem Geistigen der Sternenwelt eigentlich gar nicht entgegenwachsen kann oder schwer entgegenwachsen kann. Sie wird ihr natürlich entgegenwachsen, aber sie kann ihr nur schwer entgegenwachsen. Und so habe ich gerade an dieser Persönlichkeit die merkwürdige Entdeckung gemacht, daß es bei solchen neueren rationalistisch-intellektualistischen Individualitäten ein Hindernis in der Karma-Ausgestaltung ist, daß sie nicht an die Sterne in ihrer Wesenheit so ungehindert herankommen können. Bei der weiteren Nachforschung ergab sich, daß diese Persönlichkeit eben alle Kraft zu ihrem Rationalismus aus der Zeit geholt hat, die noch dem Anbruche der Michael-Herrschaft voranging. Sie war noch nicht berührt in richtiger Weise von der MichaelHerrschaft.
[ 25 ] Nun wurde aber ganz stark herausgefordert die weitere Prüfung des Karma dieser Persönlichkeit für die Vergangenheit. Denn ich mußte mir sagen: Da liegt doch etwas vor, was diese Persönlichkeit aus den Ergebnissen vergangener Erdenleben karmisch so präpariert, daß das nicht nur im Erdenleben sich auswirkt, sondern noch hineinstößt in das Leben, das nach dem Tode liegt. Es ist das schon ein recht merkwürdiges Phänomen.
[ 26 ] Da zeigte sich denn, daß das Leben, welches vorangegangen ist diesem Ihnen skizzenhaft beschriebenen Erdenleben, das in der Gestalt des Strader sich spiegelt, das Leben, das diesem Erdenleben in den geistigen Welten vorangegangen ist, ein arges Prüfungsleben war, ein rechtes Prüfungsleben im Übersinnlichen: Wie soll ich’s denn mit dem Christentum halten?
[ 27 ] Man möchte sagen, es bereitet sich langsam da im Übersinnlichen etwas vor, was diese Persönlichkeit unsicher macht in bezug auf die Auffassung ihres Christentums im Erdenleben. Auch das schimmert in der Strader-Figur durch: Sie ist in nichts sicher, weist ab in einer gewissen Weise dasjenige, was übersinnlich ist, will es nur mit dem Verstande erfassen, will aber doch etwas sehen. Erinnern Sie sich an die Schilderung des Strader. So ist es schon; so ist diese Persönlichkeit auch im Leben aus ihrem Karma in früherer Zeit herausgewachsen. Und es zeigt sich, daß tatsächlich diese Persönlichkeit beim Durchgange durch das Leben zwischen Tod und neuer Geburt, vor diesem Erdenleben am Ende des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts und im Beginn des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts, in sehr stark abgedämpftem Bewußtseinszustande durch das Sternenleben durchgegangen ist, abgedämpft gerade dieses Leben zwischen Tod und neuer Geburt durchläuft. Dadurch trat dann im Leben die Reaktion auf, um so hellere, festere Begriffe zu fassen gegenüber den stumpfen Begriffsbildern, die diese Persönlichkeit zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt durchmachte.
[ 28 ] Wenn man nun hinüberkommt über diese, ich möchte sagen, die Sternenwelten immer wie im Nebel zeigenden Erscheinungen zu dem vorigen Erdenleben dieser Persönlichkeit, da findet man etwas höchst Merkwürdiges. Da wird man zunächst — wenigstens ich wurde es — geführt zu dem «Sängerkrieg auf der Wartburg» 1206, gerade in der Zeit, die ich Ihnen geschildert habe als diejenige, in der die alten Platoniker zum Beispiel der Schule von Chartres hinaufgegangen waren in die geistige Welt, die anderen, die Aristoteliker, noch nicht heruntergekommen waren und wo über das eigentliche fortlaufende Michael-Geschehen eine Art himmlischer Konferenz zwischen beiden, eine Besprechung stattfand. In diese Zeit fällt der Sängerkrieg auf der Wartburg hinein.
[ 29 ] Es ist immer interessant, zu verfolgen: Was ist hier auf Erden, und was ist darüber? Und so haben wir ein Ereignis in dem Sängerkrieg auf der Wartburg, das mit der fortlaufenden Michael-Strömung nicht unmittelbar zusammenhängt.
[ 30 ] Nun, wer war im Sängerkrieg auf der Wartburg? Es waren ja bedeutendste deutsche Dichter da vereinigt, die miteinander kämpften durch Gesang. Es ist ja bekannt, worinnen der Sängerkrieg auf der Wartburg bestand, wie da kämpften um den Ruhm von Fürsten und um ihre eigene Geltung Walther von der Vogelweide, Wolfram von Eschenbach, Reinmar von Zweter, daß aber einer da war, der im Grunde gegen alle anderen war: Heinrich von Ofterdingen. Und in diesem Heinrich von Ofterdingen fand ich die Individualität, die dem Urbilde des Strader zugrunde lag, wieder.
[ 31 ] Also haben wir es mit dem Heinrich von Ofterdingen zu tun — und wir müssen unsern Blick darauf wenden: Warum hat Heinrich von Ofterdingen, nachdem er durch die Pforte des Todes gegangen ist, die Schwierigkeit, wie im Dämmerzustand durchzugehen durch die Sternenwelt? Warum?
[ 32 ] Da braucht man nur die Geschichte des Sängerkrieges ein wenig zu verfolgen: Heinrich von Ofterdingen nimmt den Kampf auf gegen die andern. Man hat schon den Henker gerufen: er soll gehenkt werden, wenn er verliert. Er entzieht sich der Sache. Aber er tuft, um einen erneuerten Kampf herbeizuführen, aus dem Ungarlande den Zauberer Klingsor. Er bringt den Zauberer Klingsor aus dem Ungarlande ja wirklich nach Eisenach.
[ 33 ] Nun spielt sich da eine neuere Art Wartburgkrieg ab, bei dem Klingsor mitwirkt. Man sieht aber ganz deutlich: Klingsor, der jetzt eintritt für Heinrich von Ofterdingen, der selber kämpfend, singend auftritt, kämpft nicht allein, sondern er läßt geistige Wesenheiten mitkämpfen. Und um geistige Wesenheiten mitkämpfen zu lassen, läßt er ja zum Beispiel einen Jüngling besessen sein von einer solchen geistigen Wesenheit, läßt den dann statt seiner singen. Und er läßt noch stärkere geistige Kräfte auf der Wartburg auftreten.
[ 34 ] All dem, was da von Klingsors Seite kommt, all dem steht gegenüber Wolfram von Eschenbach. Eine Prozedur, die Klingsor ausführt, besteht ja namentlich darinnen, daß eine solche geistige Wesenheit dahinterkommen soll, ob Wolfram von Eschenbach ein gelehrter Mensch ist oder nicht. Klingsor ist erwas in die Enge getrieben durch Wolfram von Eschenbach. Denn als Wolfram von Eschenbach merkt, daß da Geistiges im Spiele ist, da singt er von dem heiligen Abendmahl, von der Transsubstantiation, von der Gegenwart Christi im Abendmahl, — und der Geist muß weichen, er kann das nicht vertragen. Hinter diesen Dingen liegen ja durchaus wirkliche Realitäten, wenn ich diese Tautologie gebrauchen darf.
[ 35 ] Und es gelingt Klingsor, dem Wolfram von Eschenbach mit Hilfe mancher geistiger Wesenheiten zu beweisen, daß Wolfram von Eschenbach wohl ein sternenloses Christentum hat, das nicht mehr mit dem Kosmos rechnende Christentum hat, aber ganz ungelehrt ist in aller kosmischen Weisheit. Darauf kommt es nun an. Klingsor hat bewiesen, daß der Sänger des Gral schon in jener Zeit nur alles das vom Christentum kennt, was das kosmische Christentum abgestreift hat. Und Klingsor kann ja nur dadurch in der geistig unterstützten Weise auftreten, daß er die Sternenweisheit hat. Aber schon aus der Art und Weise, wie er sie verwendet, sieht man, daß sich dasjenige, was man «schwarze Magie» nennt, in seine Künste hineinmischt.
[ 36 ] Und so sehen wir denn, wie auf eine unrichtige Weise dem Sternen-Laien Wolfram von Eschenbach die Sternenweisheit entgegengestellt worden ist. Wir stehen in der Zeit des dreizehnten Jahrhunderts, vor dem Auftreten jener Dominikaner, von denen ich gesprochen habe; wir stehen in der Zeit, wo das Christentum gerade da, wo es besonders groß war, abgestreift hat alle Einsicht in die Sternenwelt und wo im Grunde genommen nur da, wo innerliche Entfremdung von dem Christentum war, noch Sternenweisheit vorhanden war, wie bei dem Klingsor aus dem Ungarlande.
[ 37 ] Nun hatte Heinrich von Ofterdingen den Klingsor herbeigerufen, hatte also den Bund geschlossen mit der unchristlichen Sternenweisheit. Dadurch ist in einer gewissen Weise Heinrich von Ofterdingen verbunden geblieben nicht nur mit der Persönlichkeit des Klingsor, die später aus seinem übersinnlichen Leben eigentlich verschwunden ist, sondern namentlich verbunden geblieben zunächst mit der entchristeten Kosmologie des Mittelalters. Und so lebte er weiter zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt, wird dann wiedergeboren in der Art, wie ich es Ihnen geschildert habe, lebt sich in eine gewisse Unsicherheit des Christentums hinein.
[ 38 ] Aber das Wesentliche ist dieses: Er stirbt wiederum, macht den Weg zurück, und indem er den Weg zurück macht in der Seelenwelt, steht er auf Schritt und Tritt der Norwendigkeit gegenüber, um wiederum an die Sternenwelt heranzukommen, durch den harten Kampf durchzugehen, den Michael bei Inanspruchnahme seiner Herrschaft führen mußte gerade im letzten Drittel des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts gegen jene dämonischen Gewalten, die mit der unchristlichen Kosmologie des Mittelalters zusammenhängen. Und um dieses Bild vollständig zu machen: Man konnte ganz genau sehen, wie unter denen, welche nun die Michael-Herrschaft hart bekämpften, gegen welche die Geister des Michael vorgehen mußten, gerade diejenigen geistigen Wesenheiten jetzt noch sind, welche dazumal auf der Wartburg von Klingsor beschworen worden sind, um gegen Wolfram von Eschenbach aufzutreten.
[ 39 ] So daß also hier das vorliegt, daß jemand, der durch seine sonstigen karmischen Ergebnisse vorübergehend sogar in den Kapuzinerdienst hereingetrieben war, nicht herankommen konnte an das Christentum, nicht herankommen konnte aus dem Grunde, weil er in sich trug den Antagonismus gegen das Christentum, den er dazumal aufgebracht hatte, als er den Klingsor aus dem Ungarlande zu Hilfe gerufen hat gegen Wolfram von Eschenbach, den Sänger des Parsifal. Und während sich im Unbewußten dieses Mannes noch immer die unchristliche Kosmologie abgedämmert zeigte, war in seinem gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein ein rationalistisches Christentum vorhanden, das nicht einmal besonders interessant ist. Interessant ist nur sein Lebenskampf, mit dem christlichen Rationalismus eine Art rationalistischer Religion begründen zu wollen.
[ 40 ] Aber sehen Sie, meine lieben Freunde, das Wichtigste, das Bedeutsamste ist, was man nun sieht als Zusammenhang zwischen abstraktem Rationalismus, abstraktem scharfsinnigem Denken und demjenigen, was im Unterbewußten webt: abgedämpfte, gelähmte Vorstellungen über die Sterne und Beziehungen zu den Sternen leben sich herauf in das Bewußtsein als abstrakte Gedanken.
[ 41 ] Und wenn man dann verfolgt, wie geartet in ihrem Karma die auf materialistische Weise gescheitesten Menschen der Gegenwart sind, dann kommt man darauf, daß diese Menschen zumeist in früheren Erdenleben etwas zu tun hatten mit der kosmologischen Abirrung ins Schwarzmagische. Das ist ein bedeutsamer Zusammenhang.
[ 42 ] Er hat sich instinktiv in den Bauern erhalten, die von vorneherein einen gewissen Abscheu haben, wenn unter ihnen einer herumgeht, der allzu gescheit ist in rationalistischer Beziehung. Den mögen sie nicht. Da steckt instinktiv in der Anschauung etwas von dem drinnen, was in solche Zusammenhänge gehört.
[ 43 ] Ja, meine lieben Freunde, betrachten Sie das aber jetzt alles in unserm Zusammenhang. Solchen Geistern begegnete man im letzten Drittel des neunzehnten und im Beginn des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts. Sie gehörten zu den interessantesten. So ein wiedergeborener Heinrich von Ofterdingen, der mit dem schwärzesten Magier seiner Zeit, mit Klingsor, zu tun hatte, der erweist sich schon als interessant gerade in seinem rationalistischen Verstande!
[ 44 ] Aber es zeigt sich hier, welche Schwierigkeiten bestehen, wenn man in richtiger Art an die Sternenweisheit herankommen will. Und dieses richtige Herankommen an die Sternenweisheit, das man braucht, um Karma zu durchschauen, ist eben nur im Lichte einer richtigen Einsicht in die Michael-Herrschaft und in einem Sich-zuMichael-Halten möglich.
[ 45 ] Das bezeugt Ihnen wiederum, wie durch die ganze Wirklichkeit der neueren Zeit — ich habe Ihnen das heute an einem einzelnen Beispiele gezeigt, an dem Beispiel des Vorbildes des Strader — eine Strömung des geistigen Lebens heraufgekommen ist, die es schwer macht, in unbefangener Art an die Wissenschaft der Sterne, damit an die Wissenschaft des Karma heranzukommen. Wie man das dennoch kann und sicher sein kann, daß man, ungehindert von den Anfechtungen, die heute möglich sind von jener Seite, die ich charakterisiert habe, dennoch an die Sternenweisheit und an die Gestaltung des Karma herankommen kann, davon wollen wir dann morgen weitersprechen.
Seventh Lecture
[ 1 ] I would like to organize today's and tomorrow's lecture in such a way that some guidelines can emerge from it in order to shed some light on the effect of karma on the one hand, but also on the significance of knowledge relating to the karma of human beings for the general history of development, especially of spiritual life. We cannot understand karma in its effectiveness if we only look at the successive earth lives of any individuality. It is certainly the case that within an earthly life, where the earthly career of this or that person or one's own is confronted with strong illumination, one is above all deeply interested in the question: How do the results of previous earthly lives reach over into later ones? - But this mode of action would never become explicable if one had to stop at the earth lives, for between the earth lives man lives the life between death and new birth. And in this life between death and a new birth the actual karma is worked out from what happens in an earthly life in connection with other human souls who are disembodied, who are karmically connected with them, who are also in the life between death and a new birth, and in connection with spirits of the higher hierarchies, and probably also with spirits of lower hierarchies. And this karma in its elaboration only becomes understandable if one can look at the extraterrestrial star being, which, in the way it appears to the physical eye, only shows its outer side.
[ 2 ] It must be said again and again: Physicists would be highly astonished if they came to places where the stars are that they look at through their telescopes, that are analyzed in the spectroscopes with regard to their substances, indeed their constitution. These physicists would be astonished if they were to come up to the places where these stars are, which they observe through their telescopes, and now see that they do not find there at all what they expect! That which a star shows to the observation of the earth is actually only a rather insubstantial outward appearance for its own existence; while that which the star contains is of a spiritual nature, or if it is of a physical nature, shows itself as a remnant, one would like to say, of a spiritual.
[ 3 ] You can best realize, my dear friends, what is there in the following way. Consider for a moment if some inhabitant of another star were to observe the earth in a similar way to the way astronomers and astrophysicists observe other stars: he would describe a disk that glows and shines out into the universe, in which he would perhaps find dark and bright spots that he would somehow interpret. The interpretation would probably not agree with what we earth dwellers among us know. Perhaps, if Vesuvius was spitting fire and one could observe it, he would talk about comets flying in from outside and the like. In any case, what such an astronomer would describe would have very little to do with what actually forms our earth.
[ 4 ] And what is it that forms our earth? Just think for a moment: our earth emerged from what I described in my “Secret Science” as Saturn's existence. There was no air, no gases, no liquid, no solid earth components, there was only heat differentiation. And in this differentiation of heat, everything that later became the mineral, plant and animal kingdoms, including the human kingdom, was germinating. We humans were also still inside this Saturn, in this warmth.
[ 5 ] Then it developed further: The air was deposited out of the warmth, water was deposited, the solid was deposited; they are all remnants that were deposited, that were thrown out there by human beings in order to achieve their formation. Everything that is mineral and solid belongs to us, is only a residue, just as the watery, just as the airy. So that what is essential on our earth is not that which is there in the realms of nature, nor that which we carry in our bones and muscles, for these are again composed of what has been separated and what we have taken in again; but what is essential is our souls. And the rest is basically all more or less appearance or residual product and the like.
[ 6 ] The earth would only be described truthfully if it were described as the colony of human souls in the universe. And so all the stars are colonies of spirit beings in world space, colonies that can be known. Our own soul, having passed through the gate of death, moves through these star colonies, makes its further way of development through to a new birth in communion with those souls who are already there as human souls, in communion with the beings of the higher hierarchies or also of lower hierarchies, and then, according to how karma has been worked out, how the human being has matured, comes back again to take on an earthly body. So that if we want to understand karma, we must again come to a star wisdom, to a spiritual investigation of the human path between death and new birth in connection with the star beings.
[ 7 ] Now, however, it is precisely until the dawn of Michael's reign that there are great difficulties for people of more recent times to arrive at a real wisdom of the stars. And in that anthroposophy nevertheless had to approach this starry wisdom, it knows how to be grateful to the circumstance that the Michael reign broke over the events of earthly humanity in the last third of the nineteenth century. And among the many things that are due to the Michael rule is precisely this, that we have regained unhindered access to the investigation of that which must be investigated in the worlds of the stars so that we can understand karma, the formation of karma in humanity.
[ 8 ] I would like to show you this with an example today in order to lead you slowly into the extraordinarily difficult questions that are linked to the study of karma. I would like to give you an example from which you can see to a certain extent what has to happen before we can talk about the workings of karma in the way we are doing now in this lecture. For, is it not true, you know that if the contents of these lectures were somehow spoken of in public, in the ordinary popular public today, what is quite exact research would be regarded as folly, as foolishness. But it is very exact research, and you must become acquainted with all the responsibilities of which one becomes aware in such research, must become acquainted with everything that stands in the way of such research, which, so to speak, “thorny hedges” one has to pass in such research. For it is necessary that a number of people should be able to know them with all those karmic peculiarities of the Michael affinity of which I have spoken; know precisely that these things are a matter of serious spiritual research and not what the uninformed, who are outside the anthroposophical movement, think about such things today.
[ 9 ] Most of you, my dear friends - I have already mentioned this fact in part - will remember a figure that appears again and again in my Mysteries: the figure of Strader.
[ 10 ] This figure of Strader is, insofar as this can be the case in a poem, in a certain sense drawn from life. I have already mentioned this to some of you here. And the personality of Strader had a kind of role model who experienced the development of the last third of the nineteenth century and in a certain sense came to a kind of rationalistic Christianity. A personality who, after an extraordinarily difficult youth - something of this shines through in Strader's portrayal - became a Capuchin, but could not stand it within the church and then found his way to the professorship.
[ 11 ] This personality, when he had been driven out of theology and into philosophy, became an enthusiastic exponent of Lessing's free-spirited religion. The personality was then such that it came into a kind of inner conflict with the official Christianity and wanted to establish a kind of rationalistic Christianity out of reason, quite consciously. And the struggles of the soul that you find in Strader in my mystery dramas were already played out with a certain variation in this personality's life.
[ 12 ] Now you know that the personality of Strader dies in my last mystery drama. And when I myself look back on the way in which Strader's personality was woven into the whole of my mystery dramas, then I have to say: even though there would have been no external obstacle to letting Strader live on, like the others, he dies out of an inner necessity! So that it is even possible to see Strader's death as a surprise in the mystery drama. Strader dies at a certain moment: I had the feeling I couldn't treat Strader any further in the mystery dramas.
.[ 13 ] Why is that? Yes, you see, my dear friends, in the meantime, if I may call it that, the original has died. And you can imagine how deeply this original interested me in its development, since I had just created the figure of Strader. This original continues to interest me, even after it has passed through the gate of death.
[ 14 ] But now there is a certain peculiarity. If we are just induced to follow a personality with the observing eye in the time that follows death, which lasts about a third of physical earth-life - earth-life is repeated in a certain way in the backward course, but at three times the speed - what does the human being actually experience in the decades that immediately follow earth-life?
[ 15 ] If you imagine a human life here on earth, it is divided into days and nights, waking states and sleeping states. In the sleeping states there are always pictorial reminiscences of daytime life. When one looks back on life in this way, one usually only remembers the day states, the waking states, one does not pay attention at all, because one should actually organize the memories in this way: I remember from morning to evening, now it breaks off, from morning to evening - breaks off again, from morning to evening - breaks off again.
[ 16 ] But because there's nothing inside the memory at night, we simply draw the line straight through and falsify our memories by just lining up the days. But after death we have to live through in strong reality what was present in the nights, during the third part of life, and we have to live through it backwards. And that is the peculiar thing: One has a certain sense of being, I would say, a sense of reality of what one encounters on earth. If you didn't have this sense of reality, you would think that everything you encounter during the day is a dream. So you have a certain sense of reality. You know that things are real, that they push you when you bump into them, that they send you light, send you sounds. In short, there are many things that cause us to have a sense of reality here during our life on earth between birth and death.
[ 17 ] But if you take all that which we have here as a sense of reality, if you take, my dear friends, all that which you describe as the reality of the people you meet here, then all that is like dream reality in its intensity compared to the tremendously intense reality which one experiences in these decades immediately after death and which the observer witnesses. All this seems much more real, life on earth seems as if it were a dream, it is as if the soul is only now waking up to the intensity of life. That is the peculiar thing.
[ 18 ] And when I followed this example of Strader, the real thing, the real individuality that lived there after death, naturally occupied me much more than the memory of life on earth, which seems like a dream compared to what occurs in death. So that I could no longer have developed the interest for the living to describe it in the face of the strong impressions of the dead.
[ 19 ] I can therefore speak here from my own experience of how little intense earthly life is compared to the life that confronts you when you follow a person after death, and which is the most intense life. And if you now try to follow attentively how this life continues, especially when this special interest in life after death is aroused by the kindled earthly interest, then you will notice the difficulties that oppose it. For if one observes very carefully, insistently observes, one sees how in this backward life after death, which takes up about a third of one's lifetime, it is already apparent that the dead person wants to prepare for the formation of his karma. He sees all that he has gone through during life in this reverse, in this backward experience. If he has offended a person, he experiences it again. If I die at the age of seventy-three and have offended someone in my sixtieth year, I experience it again in the reverse experience; but I experience it in such a way that I do not experience the feelings that I had when I offended, but the feelings that the other person had about my offense. I live myself completely in the other person. And so I actually live with my own experiences in those people who have been touched by these experiences in a good or bad way. And that's where the tendency to create karmic balance prepares itself.
[ 20 ] Now the interest I had in this earthly role model of Strader, who now confronted me as a supersensible individuality, was fueled in particular by the fact that this role model really wanted to grasp Christianity in a forcefully perceptive, rationalistic way. One admires the thinker; but one notices everywhere in this rationalistic presentation of Christianity in the books of this man, which he wrote on earth, how the thread of rationalism, the thread of concepts breaks, how basically something terribly abstract comes out of it, how the person concerned cannot enter into a spiritual grasp of Christianity, how he concocts a kind of conceptual religion with philosophical concepts and so on. In short, the whole weakness of modern intellectualism is evident in this personality.
[ 21 ] This, in turn, becomes apparent in a strange way when following his life path back after death. One finds in people who do not experience such difficulties that they now gradually live themselves into the sphere of the moon. That is the first station. And when we come into the lunar region as the dead, we find there all those, I would like to say, “registrars” of our destiny, who were once the wise teachers of man in primeval times. When the moon physically separated from the earth and became a separate world body from the contents of the earth, they followed this moon. So that today, when we pass the lunar region as the dead, we first encounter the great primal teachers of mankind who were not present in the physical body, but who founded the primal wisdom, of which only a reflection is present in that which has been handed down in literature. If there are no obstacles, we find ourselves, so to speak, unhindered on the path into this lunar region.
[ 22 ] In the personality that is the archetype of the Strader, something occurred as if it were not at all able to go through this spiritual life immediately following death against the lunar region unhindered: continual obstacles, as if the lunar region did not want to let this individuality approach.
[ 23 ] And if one pursued in pictorial imagination what was actually there, then the following became apparent: It was as if the spirits, that is, the original teachers of mankind, who once brought the original spiritual science to mankind, as if these original teachers of mankind were always calling out to this original image of the Strader: You cannot come to us, for you must not yet know anything of the stars because of your particular human quality; you must wait, you must first repeat to yourself various things of what you have gone through not only in the last, but in the earlier incarnations, so that you may become mature enough to be allowed to know anything at all of the stars and their essence.
[ 24 ] And then this strange thing occurred, that you had before you an individuality that actually cannot grow towards the spiritual of the starry world, or can hardly grow towards it. Of course it will grow towards it, but it can only grow towards it with difficulty. And so it was precisely in this personality that I made the curious discovery that it is an obstacle to the shaping of karma in such newer rationalist-intellectualist individualities that they cannot approach the stars in their essence so unhindered. Further investigation revealed that this personality drew all the strength for its rationalism from the time that preceded the dawn of the Michael reign. She had not yet been touched in the right way by the Michael reign.
[ 25 ] Now, however, the further examination of the karma of this personality for the past was very strongly challenged. For I had to say to myself: there is something here that has prepared this personality karmically from the results of past earth lives in such a way that it not only has an effect in earth life, but also has an impact on the life that lies after death. This is quite a strange phenomenon.
[ 26 ] Then it turned out that the life which preceded this earthly life described to you in sketch form, which is reflected in the figure of Strader, the life which preceded this earthly life in the spiritual worlds, was a severe testing life, a real testing life in the supersensible: What should I think about Christianity?
[ 27 ] One would like to say that something is slowly preparing itself in the supersensible, which makes this personality uncertain with regard to the conception of its Christianity in earthly life. This also shines through in the Strader figure: She is not sure of anything, rejects in a certain way that which is supersensible, only wants to grasp it with the intellect, but still wants to see something. Remember the description of Strader. That is how it is; that is also how this personality grew out of its karma in earlier times. And it turns out that this personality actually passed through the life between death and new birth, before this life on earth at the end of the nineteenth century and at the beginning of the twentieth century, in a very dampened state of consciousness through the star life, passing through this very life between death and new birth in a dampened state. As a result, the reaction arose in life to grasp brighter, firmer concepts in contrast to the dull conceptual images that this personality underwent between death and a new birth.
[ 28 ] If one now passes over these, I would like to say, the starry worlds always appearing as if in a mist, to the previous earthly life of this personality, one finds something most remarkable. First of all - at least I was - one is led to the “Singers' War at the Wartburg” in 1206, precisely at the time I have described to you as the time when the old Platonists, for example of the school of Chartres, had gone up into the spiritual world, the others, the Aristotelians, had not yet come down and where a kind of heavenly conference took place between the two, a discussion about the actual ongoing Michael events. The Singers' War at Wartburg Castle falls into this period.
[ 29 ] It is always interesting to follow: What is here on earth, and what is above? And so we have an event in the Singers' War at Wartburg Castle that is not directly related to the ongoing Michael current.
[ 30 ] Now, who was at the Wartburg in the Singers' War? The most important German poets were united there, fighting with each other through song. It is well known what the Singers' War at the Wartburg consisted of, how Walther von der Vogelweide, Wolfram von Eschenbach, Reinmar von Zweter fought for the glory of princes and for their own prestige, but that there was one who was basically against all the others: Heinrich von Ofterdingen. And in this Heinrich von Ofterdingen I found the individuality that underlay the archetype of Strader.
[ 31 ] So we are dealing with Heinrich von Ofterdingen - and we must turn our attention to him: Why does Heinrich von Ofterdingen, after he has passed through the gate of death, have the difficulty of passing through the starry world as if in a state of twilight? Why?
[ 32 ] You only need to follow the story of the Singers' War a little: Heinrich von Ofterdingen takes up the fight against the others. The executioner has already been called: he is to be hanged if he loses. He evades the matter. But in order to bring about a renewed battle, he summons the sorcerer Klingsor from Hungary. He really does bring the magician Klingsor from Hungary to Eisenach.
[ 33 ] A new kind of Wartburg War is now taking place, in which Klingsor is involved. But one sees quite clearly that Klingsor, who now stands up for Heinrich von Ofterdingen, who himself appears fighting and singing, does not fight alone, but lets spiritual beings fight with him. And in order to let spiritual entities fight with him, he lets, for example, a youth be possessed by such a spiritual entity and then lets him sing instead of him. And he allows even stronger spiritual forces to appear at the Wartburg.
[ 34 ] All that comes from Klingsor's side is confronted by Wolfram von Eschenbach. One of the procedures that Klingsor carries out is that such a spiritual being should find out whether Wolfram von Eschenbach is a learned man or not. Klingsor is somewhat cornered by Wolfram von Eschenbach. For when Wolfram von Eschenbach realizes that something spiritual is involved, he sings of Holy Communion, of transubstantiation, of the presence of Christ in the Lord's Supper - and the ghost has to give way, he can't stand it. Behind these things there are indeed real realities, if I may use this tautology.
[ 35 ] And Klingsor succeeds in proving to Wolfram von Eschenbach, with the help of some spiritual entities, that Wolfram von Eschenbach does indeed have a Christianity without stars, a Christianity that no longer reckons with the cosmos, but is completely unlearned in all cosmic wisdom. That is what matters now. Klingsor has proved that the singer of the Grail already at that time only knows everything of Christianity that cosmic Christianity has stripped away. And Klingsor can only appear in the spiritually supported way that he has the wisdom of the stars. But from the way in which he uses it, we can already see that what is called “black magic” is mixed into his arts.
[ 36 ] And so we see how the wisdom of the stars has been set against the starry layman Wolfram von Eschenbach in an incorrect way. We stand in the time of the thirteenth century, before the appearance of those Dominicans of whom I have spoken; we stand in the time when Christianity, precisely where it was particularly great, had stripped away all insight into the starry world and where, basically, only where there was inner alienation from Christianity, starry wisdom was still present, as with Klingsor from Hungary.
[ 37 ] Now Henry of Ofterdingen had summoned Klingsor, had thus made a covenant with the unchristian wisdom of the stars. Thus, in a certain way, Heinrich von Ofterdingen remained connected not only with the personality of Klingsor, which later actually disappeared from his supernatural life, but remained connected by name first of all with the unchristianized cosmology of the Middle Ages. And so he lived on between death and a new birth, is then reborn in the way I have described to you, lives into a certain uncertainty of Christianity.
[ 38 ] But the essential thing is this: He dies again, makes his way back, and by making his way back in the world of souls, he is confronted at every turn by the necessity of the north, in order to reach the starry world again, to go through the hard struggle that Michael had to wage in claiming his dominion, especially in the last third of the nineteenth century, against those demonic powers that are connected with the unchristian cosmology of the Middle Ages. And to complete this picture: One could see quite clearly how among those who now fought hard against Michael's rule, against whom the spirits of Michael had to take action, there are still those very spiritual entities that were summoned by Klingsor at the Wartburg at that time to appear against Wolfram von Eschenbach.
[ 39 ] So that what we have here is that someone who, through his other karmic results, was even temporarily driven into the Capuchin service, could not approach Christianity, could not approach it for the reason that he carried within him the antagonism against Christianity which he had stirred up at that time when he summoned Klingsor from Hungary to help him against Wolfram von Eschenbach, the singer of Parsifal. And while the unchristian cosmology was still dormant in this man's unconscious, a rationalistic Christianity was present in his ordinary consciousness, which is not even particularly interesting. Interesting is only his life's struggle to want to establish a kind of rationalistic religion with Christian rationalism.
[ 40 ] But you see, my dear friends, the most important, the most significant thing is what one now sees as the connection between abstract rationalism, abstract astute thinking and that which weaves in the subconscious: dampened, paralyzed mental images about the stars and relationships to the stars come to life in the conscious mind as abstract thoughts.
[ 41 ] And if one then traces the nature of the karma of the most materialistically clever people of the present, then one comes to the conclusion that these people mostly had something to do with the cosmological aberration into black magic in earlier earthly lives. That is a significant connection.
[ 42 ] It has been instinctively preserved in the peasants, who from the outset have a certain disgust when someone who is all too clever in rationalistic terms walks around among them. They don't like him. There is instinctively something in the view that belongs in such contexts.
[ 43 ] Yes, my dear friends, but now consider all this in our context. Such spirits were encountered in the last third of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century. They were among the most interesting. Such a reborn Heinrich von Ofterdingen, who had to deal with the blackest magician of his time, Klingsor, proves to be interesting precisely in his rationalistic mind!
[ 44 ] But this shows the difficulties that exist when one wants to approach the wisdom of the stars in the right way. And this correct approach to the wisdom of the stars, which one needs in order to see through karma, is only possible in the light of a correct insight into the Michael rule and in a holding oneself to Michael.
[ 45 ] This again testifies to you how through the whole reality of modern times - I have shown you this today with a single example, the example of Strader - a current of spiritual life has arisen which makes it difficult to approach the science of the stars, and thus the science of karma, in an unbiased way. How one can nevertheless do this and be sure that, unhindered by the temptations that are possible today from that side which I have characterized, one can nevertheless approach the wisdom of the stars and the shaping of karma, we will then discuss further tomorrow.