Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

Natural Science and Its Boundaries
GA 322

3 October 1920, Dornach

II. Paths to the Spirit in East and West

Yesterday I tried to show the methods used by Eastern spirituality for approaching the super-sensible world. I pointed out how anybody who wished to follow this path into the super-sensible more or less dispensed with the bridge linking him with his fellows. He preferred to avoid the communication with other human beings that is established by speaking, thinking and ego-perception. I showed how the attempt was first of all made not to hear and understand through the word what another person wished to say, but actually to live in the words themselves. This process of living-in-the-word was enhanced by forming the words into certain aphorisms. One lived in these and repeated them, so that the soul forces acquired by thus living in the words were further strengthened by repetition.

I showed how in this way a soul-condition was attained that we might call a state of Inspiration, in the sense in which I have used the word. What distinguished the sages of the ancient Eastern world was that they were true to their race; conscious individuality was far less developed with them than it came to be in later stages of human evolution. This meant that their penetration of the spiritual world was a more or less instinctive process. Because the whole thing was instinctive and to some extent the product of a healthy human impulse, it could not in ancient times lead to the pathological disturbances of which we have also spoken. In later times steps were taken by the so-called Mystery centres to guard against such disturbances as I have tried to describe to you. What I said was that those in the West, who wish to come to grips with the spiritual world, must attempt things in a different way.

Mankind has progressed since the days of which I was speaking. Other soul forces have emerged, so that it is not simply a matter of breathing new life into the ancient Eastern way of spiritual development. A reactionary harking back to the spiritual life of prehistoric times or of man's early historical development is impossible. For the Western world, the way of initiation into the super-sensible world is through Imagination. But Imagination must be integrated organically with our spiritual life as a whole. This can come about in the most varied ways: as it did, after all, in the East. There, too, the way was not determined unequivocally in advance. To-day I should like to describe a way of initiation that conforms to the needs of Western civilisation and is particularly well suited to anyone who is immersed in the scientific life of the West.


In my book, Knowledge of the Higher Worlds, I have described a sure path to the super-sensible. But this book has a fairly general appeal and is not specially suited to the requirements of someone with a definite scientific training. The path of initiation which I wish to describe to-day is specifically designed for the scientist. All my experience tells me that for such a man the way of knowledge must be based on what I have set out in The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity. I will explain what I mean by this.

This book, The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity, was not written with the objects in mind that are customary when writing books to-day. Nowadays people write simply in order to inform the reader of the subject-matter of the book, so that he learns what the book contains in accordance with his education, his scientific training or the special knowledge he already possesses. This was not basically my intention in writing The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity. For this reason it will not be popular with those who read books only to acquire information. The purpose of the book is to make the reader use his own processes of thought on every page, In a sense the book is only a kind of musical score, to be read with inward thought-activity in order to be able of oneself to advance from one thought to the next. This book constantly expects the reader to co-operate by thinking for himself.

Moreover, what happens to the soul of the reader, when he makes this effort of co-operation in thought, is also to be considered. Anybody who works through this book and brings his thought-activity to bear on it will admit to gaining a measure of self-comprehension in an element of his soul-life where this had been lacking. If he cannot do this, he is not reading The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity in the right way. He should feel how he is being lifted out of his usual concepts into thoughts which are independent of his sense-life and in which his whole existence is merged. He should be able to feel how this kind of thinking has freed him from dependence on the bodily state. Anyone who denies experiencing this has fundamentally misunderstood the book. It should be more or less possible to say: “Now I know through what I have achieved in the thought-activity of my soul what true thinking really is.”

The strange thing is that most Western philosophers utterly deny the reality of the very thing that my Philosophy of Spiritual Activity seeks to awaken in the soul of the reader. Countless philosophers have expounded the view that pure thinking does not exist, but is bound to contain traces, however diluted, of sense-perception. A strong impression is left that philosophers who maintain this have never really studied mathematics, or gone into the difference between analytical and empirical mechanics. The degree of specialisation required to-day will alone account for the fact that a great deal of philosophising goes on nowadays without the remotest understanding of mathematical thinking. Philosophy is fundamentally impossible without a grasp of at least the spirit of mathematical thinking. Goethe's attitude to this has been noticed, even though he made no claim himself to any special training in mathematics. Many would deny the existence of the very faculty which I should like readers of The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity to acquire.

Let us imagine a reader who simply sets about working through The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity within the framework of his ordinary consciousness in the way I have just described. He will not of course be able to claim that he has been transported into a super-sensible world; for I intentionally wrote this book in the way I did so as to present people with a work of pure philosophy. Just consider what advantage it would have been to anthroposophically orientated science if I had written works of spiritual science from the start. They would of course have been disregarded by all trained philosophers as the amateurish efforts of a dilettante. To begin with I had to concentrate on pure philosophy: I had to present the world with something thought out in pure philosophical terms, even though it transcended the normal bounds of philosophy.

However, at some point the transition had to be made from pure philosophy and science to writing about spiritual science. This occurred at a time when I had been asked to write about Goethe's scientific works, and this was followed by an invitation to write one particular chapter in a German biography of Goethe that was about to appear. It was in the late 1890's and the chapter was to be concerned with Goethe's scientific works. I had actually written it and sent it to the publisher when another work of mine came out, called Mysticism at the Dawn of the Modern Age. This book was a link between pure philosophy and philosophy based on Anthroposophy. When this came out, my other manuscript was returned to me. Nothing was enclosed apart from my fee, the idea being that any claim I might make had thus been met. Among the learned pedants there obviously was no interest in anything written—not even a single chapter devoted to the development of Goethe's attitude to natural science—by one who had indulged in such mysticism.

I will now assume that The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity has already been studied with one's ordinary consciousness in the way I have suggested. We are now in the right frame of mind to guide our souls in the direction briefly indicated yesterday—along the first steps of the way leading to Imagination. It is possible to pursue this path in a form consonant with Western life if we simply try to surrender ourselves completely to the world of outer phenomena, so that we absorb them without thinking about them. In ordinary waking life, you will agree, we are constantly perceiving, but in the very act of doing so we are always permeating out perceptions with concepts. Scientific thinking involves a systematic interweaving of perceptions with concepts, building up systems of concepts and so on. In acquiring a capacity for the kind of thinking that gradually results from reading The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity, we become capable of such strong inner activity that we are able to perceive without conceptualising.

There is something further we can do to strengthen our soul-forces so that we are enabled to absorb perceptions in the way I have just described: that is, by refraining from elaborating them with concepts in the very act of absorbing them. We can call up symbolic or other kinds of images—visual images, sound images, images of warmth, taste, and so on. If we thus bring our activity of perception into a state of flux, as it were, and infuse it with life and movement, not in the way we follow when forming concepts, but by working on our perceptions in an artistic or symbolising manner, we shall develop much sooner the power of allowing the percepts to permeate us in their pure essence. Simply to train ourselves rigorously in what I have called phenomenalism—that is, in elaborating the phenomena—is an excellent preparation for this kind of cognition. If we have really striven to reach the material boundaries of cognition—if we have not lazily looked beyond the veil of sense for metaphysical explanations in terms of atoms and molecules, but have used concepts to set in order the phenomena and to follow them through to their archetypes—then we have already undergone a training which can enable us to keep all conceptional activity away from the phenomena. And if at the same time we turn the phenomena into symbols and images, we shall acquire such strength of soul as to be able, one might say, to absorb the outer world free from concepts.

Obviously we cannot expect to achieve this all at once. Spiritual research demands far more of us than research in a laboratory or observatory. Above all an intense effort of will is required. For a time we should strive to concentrate on a symbolic picture, and occupy ourselves with the images that arise, leaving them undisturbed by phenomena present in the soul. Otherwise they will disappear as we hurry through life from sensation to sensation and from experience to experience. We should accustom ourselves to contemplating at least one such image—whether of our own creation or suggested by somebody else—for longer and longer periods. We should penetrate to its very core, concentrating on it beyond the possibility of being influenced by mere memory. If we do all this, and keep repeating the process, we can strengthen our soul forces and finally become aware of an inner experience, of which formerly we had not the remotest inkling.

Finally—it is important not to misunderstand what I am going to say—it is possible to form a picture of something experienced only in our inner being, if we recall especially lively dream-pictures, so long as they derive from memories and do not relate directly to anything external, and are thus a sort of reaction stemming from within ourselves. If we experience these images in their fullest depth, we have a very real experience; and the point is reached when we meet within ourselves the spiritual element which actuates the processes of growth. We meet the power of growth itself. Contact is established with a part of our human make-up which we formerly experienced only unconsciously, but which is nevertheless active within us. What do I mean by “experienced unconsciously?”

Now I have told you how from birth until the change of teeth a spiritual soul force works on and through the human being; and after this it more or less detaches itself. Later, between the change of teeth and maturity, it immerses itself, so to speak, in the physical body, awakening the erotic impulse—and much else besides. All this happens unconsciously. But if we consciously use such soul-activities as I have described in order to observe how the qualities of soul and spirit can penetrate our physical make-up, we begin to see how these processes work in a human being, and how from the time of his birth he is given over to the external world. Nowadays this relation to the outer world is regarded as amounting to nothing more than abstract perception or abstract knowledge. This is not so. We are surrounded by a world of colour, sound and warmth and by all kinds of sensory impressions. As our thinking gets to work on them, our whole being receives yet further impressions. When unconscious experiences of childhood come to be experienced consciously, we even find that, while we were absorbing colour and sound impressions unconsciously, they were working spiritually upon us. When, between the change of teeth and maturity, erotic feelings make their first impact, they do not simply grow out of our constitution but come to meet us from the cosmos in rays of colour, sound and warmth.

But warmth, light and sound are not to be understood in a merely physical sense. Through our sensory impressions we are conscious only of what I might call outer sound and outer colour. And when we thus surrender ourselves to nature, we do not encounter the ether-waves, atoms and so on which are imagined by modern physics and physiology. Spiritual forces are at work in the physical world; forces which between birth and death fashion us into the human beings we are.

When once we tread the paths of knowledge which I have described, we become aware of the fact that it is the outer world which forms us. As we become clearly conscious of spirit in the outer world, we are able to experience consciously the living forces at work in our bodies. It is phenomenology itself that reveals to us so clearly the existence of spirit in the outer world. It is the observation of phenomena, and not abstract metaphysics, that brings the spiritual to our notice, if we make a point of observing consciously what we would otherwise tend to do unconsciously; if we notice how through the sense-world spiritual powers enter into our being and work formatively upon it.

Yesterday I pointed out to you that the Eastern sage virtually ignores the significance of speech, thought and ego-perception. His attitude towards these activities is different, for speech, perception of thoughts and ego-perception tend at first to lead us away from the spiritual world into social contact with other human beings. We buy our way into social life, as it were, by exposing our thoughts, our speech and our ego-perception and making them communicable. The Eastern sage lived in the word and resigned himself to the fact that it could not be communicated. He felt the same about his thoughts; he lived in his thinking, and so on. In the West we are more inclined to cast a backward glance at humanity as we follow the path into the super-sensible world.


At this point it is well to remember that man has a certain kind of sensory organisation within him. I have already described the three inner senses through which he becomes aware of his inner being, just as he perceives what goes on around him. We have a sense of balance, which tells us of the space we occupy as human beings and within whose limits our wills can function. We have a sense of movement, which tells us, even in the dark, that we are moving. This knowledge comes from within and is not derived from contact with outside objects that we may touch in passing. We have a “sense of life,” through which we are aware of our general state of health, or, one might say, of our constantly changing inward condition.

It is just in the first seven years of our life that these three inner senses work in conjunction with the will. We are guided by our sense of balance: and a being that, to begin with, cannot move about and later on can only crawl, is transformed into one that can stand upright and walk. When we learn to walk upright, we are coming to grips with the world. This is possible only because of our sense of balance. Similarly, our sense of movement and our sense of life contribute to our development as integrated human beings.

Anybody able to apply laboratory standards of objective observation to the study of man's development—spirit-soul as well as physical—will soon discover how those forces that form the human being and are especially active in the first seven years free themselves and begin to assume a different aspect from the time of the change of teeth. By this time a person is less intimately connected with his inner life than he was as a child. A child is closely bound up inwardly with human equilibrium, movement and processes of life. As emancipation from them gradually occurs, something else is developing. A certain adjustment is taking place to the three senses of smell, taste and touch.

A detailed observation of the way a child comes to grips with life is extraordinarily interesting. This can be seen most obviously, of course, in early life, but anybody trained to do so can see it clearly enough later on as well. I refer to the process of orientation made possible by the senses of smell, of taste and of touch. The child in a manner expels from himself the forces of equilibrium, movement and life and, while he is so doing, draws into him the qualitative senses of smell, taste and touch. Over a fairly long period the former are, so to speak, being breathed out and the latter breathed in; so that the two trinities encounter each other within our organism—the forces of equilibrium, movement and life pushing their way outward from within, while smell, taste and touch, which point us to qualities, are pressing inwards from without. These two trinities of sense interpenetrate each other; and it is through this interpenetration that the human being first comes to realise himself as a true self.

Now we are cut off from outer spirituality by speech and by our faculties of perceiving the thoughts and perceiving the egos of others—and rightly so, for if it were otherwise we could never in this physical life grow into social beings. [See previous lecture.] In precisely the same way, inasmuch as the qualities of smell, taste and touch wax counter to equilibrium, movement and life, we are inwardly cut off from the last three—which would otherwise disclose themselves to us directly. One could say that the sensations of smell, taste and touch form a barricade in front of the sensations of balance, movement and life and prevent our experiencing them.

What is the result of that development towards Imagination of which I spoke? It is this. The oriental stops short at speech in order to live in it; stops at thought in order to live in it; stops at ego-perception in order to live in it; and by these means makes his way outward into the spiritual world. We, as the result of developing Imagination, do something similar when we absorb the external percept without conceptualising it. But the direction we take in doing this is the opposite to the direction taken by an oriental who practises restraint in the matter of speech, thought-perception and ego-perception. He stays still in these. He lives his way into them. The aspirant to Imagination, on the other hand, worms his way inward through smell, taste and perception; he penetrates inward and, ignoring the importunities of his sensations of smell, taste and touch, makes contact with the experiences of equilibrium, movement and life.

It is a great moment when we have penetrated the sensory trinity, as I have called it, of taste, smell and touch, and we stand naked, as it were, before essential movement, equilibrium and life.


Having thus prepared the ground, it is interesting to study what it is that Western mysticism so often has to offer. Most certainly, I am very far from decrying the elements of poetry, beauty and imaginative expression in many mystical writings. Most certainly I admire what, for instance, St. Theresa, Mechthild of Magdeburg and others have to tell us, and indeed Meister Eckhardt and Johannes Tauler; but all this reveals itself also to the true spiritual scientist. It is what arises if one follows an inward path without penetrating through the domain of smell, taste and touch. Read what has been written by individuals who have described with particular clarity what they have experienced in this way. They speak of an inner sense of taste, experienced in connection with the soul-spiritual element in man's inner being. They refer also to smell and touch in a special way. Anybody, for instance, who reads Mechthild of Magdeburg or St. Theresa rightly will see that they follow this inward path, but never penetrate right through smell, taste and touch. They use beautiful poetic imagery for their descriptions, but they are speaking only of how one can smell, taste and touch oneself inwardly.

It is indeed less agreeable to see the true nature of reality with spiritually developed senses than to read the accounts given by a sensual mysticism—the only term for it—which fundamentally gratifies only a refined inward-looking egotism of soul. As I say, much as this mysticism is to be admired—and I do admire it—the true spiritual scientist has to realise that it stops half-way. What is manifest in the splendid poetic imagery of Mechthild of Magdeburg, St. Theresa and others is really only what is smelt, tasted and touched before attaining to true inwardness.

Truth can be unpleasant, perhaps even cruel, at times. But modern man has no business to become rickety in soul through following a vague incomplete mysticism. What is required to-day is to penetrate the true mysteries of man's inner nature with all our intellectual powers—with the same powers that we have disciplined in the cause of science and used to effect in the outer world. There is no mistaking what science is. It is respected for the very method and discipline it demands. It is when we have learnt to be scientific that we appreciate the achievements of a vague mysticism at their true worth but we also discover that they are not what spiritual science has to foster. On the contrary, the task of spiritual science is to reveal clearly the true nature of man's being. This in turn makes possible a sound understanding of the outer world.

Instead of speaking in this way, as the truth demands of me, I could be claiming the support of every vague, woolly mystic, who goes in for mysticism to satisfy the inward appetite of his soul. That is not our concern here, but rather the discovery of powers that can be used for living; spiritual powers that are capable of informing our scientific and social life.

When we have come to grips with the forces that dwell in our senses of balance, life and movement, then we have reached something that is first of all experienced through its transparency as man's essential inward being. The very nature of the thing shows us clearly that we cannot penetrate any deeper. What we do find is quite enough to be going on with, for what we discover is not the stuff of vague mystical dreams but a genuine organology. Above all, we find within ourselves the true nature of balance and movement, and of the stream of life. We find this within ourselves.

When this experience is complete, something unique has taken place. In due course we discover something. An essential prerequisite is, as I have said, to have worked carefully through The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity. The Philosophy is then left, so to speak, on one side, while we pursue the inward path of contemplation and meditation. We have advanced as far as balance, movement and life. We live in this life, balance and movement. Parallel with our pursuit of the way of contemplation and meditation, but without any other activity on our part, our thinking in connection with The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity has undergone a transformation. We have been able to experience as pure thought what a philosophy such as this has to offer; but now that we have worked upon ourselves in another sphere, our inner soul life; this has turned into something quite different. It has taken on new dimensions and is now much more full of meaning. While on the one hand we have been penetrating our inward being and have deepened our power of Imagination, we have also lifted out of the ordinary level of consciousness the fruits of our thinking on The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity. Thoughts which formerly had a more or less abstract existence in the realm of pure cerebration have now become significant forces. They are now alive in our consciousness, and what was once pure thinking has become Inspiration. We have developed Imagination; and thinking has been transformed into Inspiration.

What we have attained by these two methods in our progress along this road has to be clearly differentiated. On the one hand we have gained Inspiration from what was, to begin with, pure thought. On the other hand, there is the experience that comes to us through our senses of balance, movement and life. We are now in a position to unite the two forms of experience, the outer and the inner. The fusion of Inspiration and Imagination brings us to Intuition.


What have we accomplished now? I can answer this question by approaching it from the other side. First of all I must draw attention to the steps taken by the Oriental seer, who wishes to advance further after being trained in the mantras and experiencing the living word and language. He now learns to experience not only the rhythms of language but also, and in a sense consciously, the process of breathing. He has, as it were, to undergo an artificial kind of breathing by varying it in all kinds of ways. For him this is one step up; but this is not something to be taken over in its entirety by the West.

What does the Eastern student of yoga attain by consciously regulating his breathing in a variety of ways? He experiences something very remarkable when he breathes in. As he does so, he is brought into contact with a quality of air that is not to be found when we experience air as a purely physical substance, but only when we unite ourselves with the air and so experience it spiritually. A genuine student of yoga, as he breathes in, experiences something that works upon his whole being, an activity that is not completed in this life and does not end with death. The spiritual quality of the outer air enters our being and engenders in us something that goes with us through the gate of death. To experience the breathing process consciously means taking part in something that continues when we have laid aside our bodies. To experience consciously the process of breathing is to experience both the reaction of our inner being to the drawing in of breath and the activities of our soul-spiritual being before birth: or let us say rather that we experience our conception and the factors that contribute to our embryonic development and work on us further within our organism as children. Breathing consciously means realising our own identity on the far side of birth and death. Advancing from the experience of the word and of language to that of breathing means penetrating further into an inspired realisation of the eternal in man. We Westerners have to experience much the same—but in a different sphere.

What in fact is the process of perception? It is only a modification of the breathing process. As we breathe in, the air presses on our diaphragm and on our whole being. Brain fluid is driven up through our spinal column into our brain. This establishes a connection between breathing and cerebral activity. Breathing, in so far as it influences the brain, works upon our sense-activity in the form of perception. Drawing in breath has various sides to it, and one of these is perception.

How is it when we breathe out? Brain fluid descends and exerts pressure on the circulation of the blood. The descent of brain fluid is bound up with the activity of will and also with breathing out. Anybody who really makes a study of The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity will discover that when we attain to pure thinking, a fusion of thinking and willing takes place. Pure thinking is fundamentally an expression of will. So it comes about that what we have characterised as pure thinking is related to what the Easterner experiences in the process of breathing out.

Pure thinking is related to breathing out, just as perception is related to breathing in. We have to go through the same process as the yogi, but in a more inward form. Yoga depends on the regulation of breathing, both in and out, and in this way comes into contact with the eternal in man. What should Western man do? He can transform into soul-experience both perception on the one hand and thinking on the other. He can unite in his inner experience perception and thinking, which would otherwise only come quietly together in a formal abstract way, so that he has the same experience inwardly in his soul and spirit as he has physically in breathing in and out. Breathing in and out are physical experiences. When they are harmonised, we experience the eternal.

We experience thought-perception in our everyday lives. As we bring movement into our soul life, we become aware of rhythm, of the swing of the pendulum, of the constant movement to and fro of perception and thinking. Higher realities are experienced in the East by breathing in and out. The Westerner develops a kind of breathing process in his soul and spirit, in place of the physical breathing of yoga, when he develops within himself, through perception, the vital process of transformed in-breathing and, through thinking, that of out-breathing; and fuses concept, thought and perception into a harmonious whole. Gradually, with the beat of this rhythmical breathing process in perception and thinking, his development advances to true spiritual reality in the form of Imagination, Inspiration and Intuition.

In my Philosophy of Spiritual Activity I indicated as a philosophical fact that reality is the product of the interpenetration of perception and thinking. Since this book was designed to deal with man's soul activity, some indication should also be given of the training that Western man needs if he is to penetrate the spiritual world. The Easterner speaks of the systole and diastole, breathing in and out. In place of these terms Western man should put perception and thinking. Where the Oriental speaks of the development of physical breathing, we in the West say: development of soul-spiritual breathing in the course of cognition through perception and thinking.


All this should perhaps be contrasted with the kind of blind alley reached by Western spiritual development. Let me explain what I mean. In 1841 Michelet, the Berlin philosopher, published Hegel's posthumous works of natural philosophy. Hegel had worked at the end of the eighteenth century, together with Schelling, at laying the foundations of a system of natural philosophy. Schelling, with the enthusiasm of youth, had built his natural philosophy in a remarkable way on what he called intellectual contemplation. But he reached a point where he could make no further progress. His immersion in mysticism produced splendid results in his work, Bruno, or concerning the Divine and Natural Principle in Things, and that fine piece of writing, Human Freedom, or the Origin of Evil. But for all this he could make no progress and began to hold back from expressing himself at all. He kept promising to follow things up with a philosophy that would reveal the true nature of those hidden forces at which his earlier natural philosophy had only hinted.

When Hegel's natural philosophy appeared in 1841, through Michelet, the position was that Schelling's expected and oft-promised philosophical revelations had still not been vouchsafed to the public. He was summoned to Berlin. But what he had to offer contained no spiritual qualities to permeate the natural philosophy he had founded. He had struggled to create an intellectual picture of the world. He stood still at this point, because he was unable to use Imagination to enter the sphere of which I have been speaking to you to-day. So there he was at a dead end.

Hegel, who had a more rational intellect, had taken over Schelling's thoughts and carried them further by applying pure thinking to the observation of nature. That was the origin of Hegel's natural philosophy. So Schelling's promise to explain nature in spiritual terms was never fulfilled, and we got Hegel's natural philosophy which was to be discarded by science in the second half of the nineteenth century. It was not understood and was bound to remain so, for there was no connection between phenomenology, or the true observation of nature, and the ideas contained in Hegel's natural philosophy. It was a strange confrontation: Schelling travelling from Munich to Berlin, where something great was expected of him, and it turned out that he had nothing to say. This was a disappointment for all those who believed that through Hegel's natural philosophy revelations about nature would emerge from pure thinking. The historical fact is that Schelling reached the stage of intellectual contemplation but not that of genuine Imagination; while Hegel showed that if pure thinking does not lead on to Imagination, it cannot lead to Inspiration and to an understanding of nature's secrets. This line of Western development had terminated in a blind alley.

There was nothing—nothing permeated with the spirit—to set against Eastern teaching, which only engendered scepticism in the West. Anyone who has lovingly immersed himself in the true Schelling and Hegel, and has thus been able to see, with love in his heart, the limitations of Western philosophy, should turn his attention to Anthroposophy. He should work to bring about an anthroposophically orientated Spiritual Science for the West, so that we come to possess something of spiritual origin to compare with what the East has created through the interaction of systole and diastole.

For us in the West, there is the spiritual-soul rhythm of perception and thinking, through which we can rise to something more than a merely abstract science. It opens the way to a living science, which on that account enables us to live in harmony with truth. After all the misfires of the Kantian, Schellingian and Hegelian philosophies, we have come to the point where we need something that can show, by revealing the way of the spirit, how truth and science are related. The truth that dwells in a spiritualised science would be a healing power in the future development of mankind.

Achter Vortrag

Gestern versuchte ich zu zeigen, auf welche Weise innerhalb des orientalischen Geisteslebens man sich zu nähern versuchte dem Gebiete der übersinnlichen Welt, und ich wies darauf hin, wie derjenige, der diesen Weg in das Übersinnliche antreten wollte, die Verbindungsbrücke gewissermaßen zwischen sich und den andern Menschen wegließ, nicht beging, dafür aber einen andern Weg wählte als denjenigen, der im sozialen Leben zunächst hinüberführt von dem einen Menschen zu seinem Mitmenschen durch die Sprache, durch den Gedanken, durch die Ich-Wahrnehmung. Und ich zeigte, wie zunächst versucht wurde, statt durch das Wort dasjenige zu hören, was der Mitmensch uns sagen will, was wir an ihm verstehen wollen, statt durch das Wort also zu verstehen, in dem Worte zu leben. Dieses In-demWorte-Leben wurde dann noch dadurch verstärkt, daß man die Worte gestaltete zu gewissen Sprüchen, in denen man lebte, die man wiederholte, so daß die Kraft der Seele, die gewonnen wurde durch dieses Leben in den Worten, sich durch die Wiederholung noch verstärkte. Und ich zeigte, wie auf diese Art etwas erreicht wurde im Seelenzustand, den man den der Inspiration in dem von mir charakterisierten Sinne nennen könnte, nur daß die Weisen der alten orientalischen Welt eben ihrer Rasse angehörten, das Ich-Bewußtsein bei ihnen weit weniger entwickelt war als in der späteren Zeit der Menschheitsentwickelung und sie daher in einer mehr instinktiven Art sich so hineinlebten in die geistige Welt. Und weil das Ganze instinktiv war, also gewissermaßen einem gesunden Trieb der menschlichen Natur entsprang, so konnte es auch in den ältesten Zeiten nicht zu den pathologischen Schädigungen führen, von denen wir auch zu sprechen hatten. In den späteren Zeiten wurden dann von den sogenannten Mysterien Maßnahmen ergriffen gegen das Hereinbrechen solcher Schädigungen, wie ich sie Ihnen zu charakterisieren versucht habe. Ich habe nun gesagt, daß diejenigen, die innerhalb der abendländischen Zivilisation zu einem Ergreifen der geistigen Welt kommen wollen, dies anders machen müssen. Die Menschheit ist mittlerweile fortgeschritten. Andere Kräfte der Seele haben sich entwickelt, und man kann nicht einfach etwa den alten orientalischen Geistesweg heute wieder erneuern. Man kann nicht in vorhistorische Zeiten oder in frühere historische Zeiten der Menschheitsentwickelung im Gebiete des Geisteslebens reaktionär zurückkehren wollen. Für die abendländische Zivilisation ist der Weg in die übersinnlichen Welten der der Imagination. Nur muß diese Imagination ganz in das übrige Seelenleben organisch hineingestellt werden. Und dies kann in der mannigfaltigsten Weise geschehen, wie ja auch schließlich der orientalische Geistesweg nicht in ganz eindeutiger Weise vorausbestimmt war, sondern wie er in der mannigfaltigsten Weise gegangen werden konnte. Ich will heute den Weg in die geistige Welt, wie er der abendländischen Zivilisation angemessen ist, so schildern, wie ihn etwa am besten gehen könnte derjenige, welcher durch das wissenschaftliche Leben des Abendlandes hindurchgeht.

In meinem Buche «Wie erlangt man Erkenntnisse der höheren Welten?» ist zwar durchaus ein sicherer Weg in die übersinnlichen Gebiete hinein charakterisiert, aber er ist so charakterisiert, daß er gewissermaßen für jedermann taugt, daß er vor allen Dingen für diejenigen taugt, welche nicht durch ein eigentliches wissenschaftliches Leben hindurchgegangen sind. Ich will ihn heute im Speziellen so charakterisieren, wie er eben mehr für den Wissenschafter taugt. Für diesen Wissenschafter muß ich auch nach allen meinen Erfahrungen als eine Art Voraussetzung ansehen — wir werden gleich nachher hören, in welchem Sinne das gemeint ist —, ich muß ansehen als eine richtige Voraussetzung dieses Erkenntnisweges das Verfolgen dessen, was in meiner «Philosophie der Freiheit» dargestellt ist. Diese «Philosophie der Freiheit» ist ja nicht in der Absicht geschrieben, in der heute zumeist Bücher geschrieben werden. Heute werden Bücher geschrieben zu dem Ziele, daß der Betreffende sich über den Inhalt des Mitgeteilten einfach informiert, daß er nach seinen besonderen Vorkenntnissen, nach seiner Bildung oder seiner wissenschaftlichen Kultur eben Kenntnis nimmt von dem, was inhaltlich in einem Buche enthalten ist. So ist eigentlich im Grunde genommen meine «Philosophie der Freiheit» nicht gemeint. Daher wird sie auch von denjenigen nicht gerade geliebt, die von einem Buche nur Kenntnis nehmen wollen. Meine «Philosophie der Freiheit» ist so gemeint, daß man zur unmittelbaren eigenen Denktätigkeit Seite für Seite greifen muß, daß gewissermaßen das Buch selbst nur eine Art Partitur ist und man in innerer Denktätigkeit diese Partitur lesen muß, um fortwährend aus dem Eigenen heraus von Gedanke zu Gedanke fortzuschreiten. So daß bei diesem Buch durchaus immer mit der gedanklichen Mitarbeit des Lesers gerechnet ist. Und es ist ferner gerechnet mit demjenigen, was aus der Seele wird, wenn sie eine solche Gedankenarbeit mitmacht. Derjenige, der sich nicht gesteht, daß, wenn er dieses Buch nun wirklich in eigener seelischer Gedankenarbeit absolviert hat, er dann gewissermaßen sich in einem Elemente des Seelenlebens erfaßt hat, in dem er sich früher nicht erfaßt hat; derjenige, der nicht spürt, daß er gewissermaßen herausgehoben ist aus seinem gewöhnlichen Vorstellen in ein sinnlichkeitsfreies Denken, in dem man sich ganz bewegt, so daß man erfühlt, wie man in diesem Denken frei geworden ist von den Bedingungen der Leiblichkeit, der liest eigentlich diese «Philosophie der Freiheit» nicht im richtigen Sinne. Und der versteht sie im Grunde genommen nicht richtig, der sich dies nicht gestehen kann. Man muß gewissermaßen sich sagen können: Jetzt weiß ich durch diese seelische Gedankenarbeit, die ich verrichtet habe, was eigentlich reines Denken ist.

Es ist ja das Eigentümliche, daß dasjenige, was gerade in der Seele real werden soll beim Verfolgen meiner «Philosophie der Freiheit», von den meisten Philosophen des Abendlandes überhaupt in seiner Realität geleugnet wird. Sie finden bei zahlreichen Philosophen Ausführungen darüber, daß es ja ein reines Denken gar nicht gäbe, daß alles Denken immer erfüllt sein müsse mit Resten wenigstens, wenn auch noch so sehr verdünnten Resten der sinnlichen Anschauung. Man müßte allerdings glauben, daß solche Philosophen niemals wirklich Mathematik studiert haben, sich niemals eingelassen haben auf den Unterschied zwischen der analytischen Mechanik und der empirischen Mechanik, die so etwas behaupten. Allein es ist ja schon durch unseren Spezialismus einmal so weit gekommen, daß man heute oftmals philosophiert, ohne überhaupt die Spur von einer Erkenntnis des mathematischen Denkens zu haben. Im Grunde genommen kann man nicht philosophieren, ohne wenigstens den Geist des mathematischen Denkens erfaßt zu haben. Wir haben gesehen, wie Goethe gegenüber diesem Geiste des mathematischen Denkens sich verhielt, wenn er auch selber sagte, daß er sich keine besondere, speziell-mathematische Kultur zuschreiben könne. Also es wird eigentlich von vielen geleugnet, daß es das gibt, von dem ich gerade möchte, daß man es sich aneignet durch das Studium der «Philosophie der Freiheit».

Und nun setzen wir voraus, jemand käme einfach innerhalb des gewöhnlichen Bewußtseins dazu, diese «Philosophie der Freiheit» in der Art durchzuarbeiten, wie ich das eben beschrieben habe, dann kann er natürlich nicht sagen: er sei irgendwie in der übersinnlichen Welt darinnen. Denn diese «Philosophie der Freiheit», ich habe sie ganz absichtlich so geschrieben, wie sie geschrieben ist, weil sie zunächst als ein rein philosophisches Werk vor die Welt hintreten sollte. Man sollte nur denken, was geleistet worden wäre für anthroposophisch orientierte Geisteswissenschaft, wenn ich gleich begonnen hätte mit geisteswissenschaftlichen Werken. Diese geisteswissenschaftlichen Werke wären selbstverständlich als der purste Dilettantismus, als Laienliteratur von allen Fachphilosophen unberücksichtigt gelassen worden. Ich mußte zunächst rein philosophisch schreiben. Ich mußte zunächst vor die Welt hinstellen etwas, was im reinen Sinne philosophisch gedacht war, trotzdem es eben hinausging über das gewöhnliche Philosophische. Aber allerdings, einmal mußte der Übergang gemacht werden von dem bloßen philosophischen und naturwissenschaftlichen Schreiben zu dem geisteswissenschaftlichen Schreiben. Es war in einer Zeit, in welcher ich gerade eingeladen war, über Goethes «Naturwissenschaftliche Schriften» zu schreiben als ein besonderes Kapitel einer deutschen Goethe-Biographie. Es war am Ende der neunziger Jahre des vorigen Jahrhunderts. Und so sollte ich das Kapitel über Goethes «Naturwissenschaftliche Schriften» schreiben. Ich hatte es auch schon geschrieben, es war bereits dem Verleger abgeliefert, und unmittelbar hinterher erschien meine Schrift: «Die Mystik im Aufgange des neuzeitlichen Geisteslebens und ihr Verhältnis zur modernen Weltanschauung», durch die ich herüberleitete den Weg von dem rein Philosophischen zu dem Anthroposophisch-Orientierten. Und ich bekam, nachdem diese Schrift erschienen war, mein Manuskript vom Verleger zurück, bloß vom Honorar begleitet, damit ich nicht irgendwie aufmucke, denn damit war dem Rechte sein Tribut gezollt. Aber man wollte von dem, der diese Mystik geschrieben hat, bei den wissenschaftlichen Zöpfen selbstverständlich nun auch nicht mehr ein Kapitel über die naturwissenschaftliche Entwickelung Goethes haben.

Nun, ich setze also voraus, daß man zunächst aus dem gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein heraus in dieser Weise, wie ich es angeführt habe, die «Philosophie der Freiheit» durchgearbeitet habe. Dann wird man in der rechten Verfassung sein, um nun gewissermaßen das in gutem Sinne vorzunehmen für seine Seele, was ich schon gestern bezeichnet habe, mit ein paar Worten allerdings nur, zunächst als den Weg in die Imagination hinein. Dieser Weg in die Imagination hinein, er kann so vollzogen werden, angemessen unserer abendländischen Zivilisation, daß man versucht, sich ganz nur der äußeren phänomenologischen Welt hinzugeben, diese unmittelbar auf sich wirken zu lassen mit Ausschluß des Denkens, aber so, daß man sie doch aufnimmt. Nicht wahr, unser gewöhnliches Geistesleben im wachen Zustande verläuft ja so, daß wir wahrnehmen und eigentlich immer im Wahrnehmen schon das Wahrgenommene mit Vorstellungen durchtränken, im wissenschaftlichen Denken ganz systematisch das Wahrgenommene mit Vorstellungen verweben, durch Vorstellungen systematisieren und so weiter. Dadurch, daß man sich ein solches Denken angeeignet hat, wie es allmählich hervortritt im Verlaufe der «Philosophie der Freiheit», kommt man nun wirklich in die Lage, so scharf innerlich seelisch arbeiten zu können, daß man, indem man wahrnimmt, ausschließt das Vorstellen, daß man das Vorstellen unterdrückt, daß man sich bloß dem äußeren Wahrnehmen hingibt. Aber damit man die Seelenkräfte verstärke und die Wahrnehmungen im richtigen Sinne gewissermaßen einsaugt, ohne daß man sie beim Einsaugen mit Vorstellungen verarbeitet, kann man auch noch das machen, daß man nicht im gewöhnlichen Sinne mit Vorstellungen diese Wahrnehmungen beurteilt, sondern daß man sich symbolische oder andere Bilder schafft zu dem mit dem Auge zu Sehenden, mit dem Ohre zu Hörenden, auch Wärmebilder, Tastbilder und so weiter. Dadurch, daß man gewissermaßen das Wahrnehmen in Fluß bringt, dadurch, daß man Bewegung und Leben in das Wahrnehmen hineinbringt, aber in einer solchen Weise, wie es nicht im gewöhnlichen Vorstellen geschieht, sondern im symbolisierenden oder auch künstlerisch verarbeitenden Wahrnehmen, dadurch kommt man viel eher zu der Kraft, sich von der Wahrnehmung als solcher durchdringen zu lassen. Man kann sich ja schon gut vorbereiten für eine solche Erkenntnis bloß dadurch, daß man wirklich im strengsten Sinne sich heranerzieht zu dem, was ich charakterisiert habe als den Phänomenalismus, als das Durcharbeiten der Phänomene. Wenn man wirklich an der materiellen Grenze des Erkennens getrachtet hat, nicht in Trägheit durchzustoßen durch den Sinnesteppich und dann allerlei Metaphysisches da zu suchen in Atomen und Molekülen, sondern wenn man die Begriffe verwendet hat, um die Phänomene anzuordnen, um die Phänomene hin zu verfolgen bis zu den Urphänomenen, dann bekommt man dadurch schon eine Erziehung, die dann auch alles Begriffliche hinweghalten kann von den Phänomenen. Und symbolisiert man dann noch, verbildlicht man die Phänomene, dann bekommt man eine starke seelische Macht, um gewissermaßen die Außenwelt begriffsfrei in sich einzusaugen.

Man muß selbstverständlich nicht glauben, dies sei zu erreichen in kurzer Zeit. Geistesforschung erfordert weit mehr Arbeit als Laboratoriums- oder Sternwartenforschung. Sie erfordert vor allen Dingen eine intensive Anstrengung des eigenen Willens. Und hat man eine Zeitlang ein solches symbolisches Vorstellen getrieben, hat man sich dazu noch bemüht, auf den Bildern, die man in dieser Weise ganz in Anlehnung an die Phänomene in der Seele präsent sein läßt und die sonst nur vorübergehen, indem man ja im Leben von Sensation zu Sensation, von Erlebnis zu Erlebnis eilt, hat man sich gewöhnt, kontemplativ lange und immer länger auf einem Bilde, das man ganz durchschaut, das man sich selber gemacht hat oder sich auch von jemandem anraten läßt, so daß es keine Reminiszenz sein kann, hat man sich gewöhnt, kontemplativ auf einem solchen Bilde zu ruhen, und wiederholt man diesen Vorgang immer wieder und wiederum, so verstärkt sich die innere Seelenkraft, und man wird zuletzt gewahr, daß man in sich selber etwas erlebt, von dem man vorher eigentlich keine Ahnung gehabt hat. Höchstens kann man - aber man sollte das eigentlich nicht mißverstehen — sich ein Bild machen von dem, was man jetzt, aber nur in seinem Inneren, erlebt, indem man sich erinnert an besonders lebendige Traumvorstellungen, nur daß die Traumvorstellungen doch immer Reminiszenzen sind und nicht unmittelbar bezogen werden dürfen auf etwas Äußeres, daß aber das einem gewissermaßen als Reaktion entgegenkommt aus dem eigenen Inneren. Wenn man also diese Bilder durchlebt, so ist das etwas durchaus Reales, und man kommt darauf, daß man jetzt in seinem eigenen Inneren antrifft dasjenige Geistige, welches den Wachstumsprozeß gibt, welches die Wachstumskraft ist. Man merkt, man kommt hinein in einen Teil seiner Menschheitskonstitution, der in einem ist, der sich mit einem verbindet, der in einem tätig ist, den man aber früher nur unbewußt erlebt hat. Wie unbewußt erlebt?

Nun, ich habe Ihnen ja gesagt, daß von der Geburt bis zum Zahnwechsel ein Geistig-Seelisches den Menschen durchorganisiert, daß es dann mehr oder weniger sich emanzipiert. Dann aber zwischen dem Zahnwechsel und der Geschlechtsreife wird durch ein solches GeistigSeelisches, das gewissermaßen untertaucht in den physischen Leib, zunächst der Liebestrieb angeregt, aber auch vieles andere. Das alles aber geschieht auf unbewußte Art. Kommt man aber mit vollem Bewußtsein durch solche seelischen Vornahmen, wie ich sie charakterisiert habe, dazu, dieses Hineindringen des Geistig-Seelischen in die leibliche Organisation zu verfolgen, dann sieht man, wie solche Prozesse im Menschen vor sich gehen, wie eigentlich der Mensch immer, von der Geburt an, der Außenwelt hingegeben ist. Man hält dieses Sich-Hingeben an die Außenwelt heute für ein bloßes abstraktes Wahrnehmen oder abstraktes Erkennen. Das ist es nicht. Indem wir umgeben sind von einer farbigen Welt, indem wir umgeben sind von einer tönenden Welt, indem wir umgeben sind von einer wärmenden Welt, kurz, indem wir umgeben sind von alldem, was Eindrücke auf unsere Sinne macht, was durch Verarbeitung der Eindrücke mit unseren Vorstellungen wiederum neuerdings Eindrücke auf unsere Organisation macht, indem wir alles dasjenige bewußt erleben, sehen wir, daß wir, wenn wir es unbewußt erleben seit der Kindheit, mit den Farbeneindrücken, mit den Toneindrücken etwas aufnehmen, was als Geistiges unsere Organisation durchdringt. Und wenn wir zum Beispiel zwischen dem Zahnwechsel und der Geschlechtsreife die Liebesempfindung aufnehmen, so ist das nicht etwas, was herauswächst aus unserem Leibe, sondern ist etwas, was der Kosmos uns gibt, was der Kosmos uns durch Farben, durch Töne, durch Wärmeströmungen, die an uns herankommen, gibt. Wärme ist noch etwas anderes als Wärme, Licht ist etwas anderes als Licht im physischen Sinne, Ton ist etwas anderes als Ton im physischen Sinne. Indem wir Sinneseindrücke haben, ist zwar nur dasjenige bewußt, was zunächst, ich möchte sagen, der äußere Ton, die äußere Farbe ist. Aber durch diese Hingebung wirkt nicht dasjenige, wovon eine moderne Physik oder Physiologie träumt, Ätherbewegungen, Atombewegungen und dergleichen, sondern es wirkt Geist, es wirken die Kräfte, die uns erst hier in der physischen Welt zwischen Geburt und Tod zu dem machen, was wir als Menschen sind. Und indem wir solche Erkenntniswege antreten, wie ich sie charakterisiert habe, werden wir gewahr, wie wir aus der äußeren Welt heraus organisiert werden. Wir verfolgen bewußt, was in uns leibt und lebt, indem wir vor allen Dingen nun einen deutlichen Sinn dafür bekommen, daß in der Außenwelt Geist vorhanden ist. Gerade durch die Phänomenologie gelangen wir dazu, deutlich zu sehen, wie in der Außenwelt Geist ist. Nicht wenn wir eine abstrakte Metaphysik treiben, sondern gerade durch die Phänomenologie gelangen wir zu der Erkenntnis des Geistes, indem wir wahrnehmen, wenn wir das zur Bewußtheit erheben, was wir sonst unbewußt tun, indem wir wahrnehmen, wie durch die Sinneswelt das Geistige in uns eindringt und uns selber organisiert.

Ich habe Ihnen gestern gesagt, daß der orientalische Weise gewissermaßen außer acht läßt die Bedeutung des Gesprochenen, die Bedeutung des Gedachten, die Bedeutung der Ich-Wahrnehmung und anders diese Dinge empfindet, andere Seelenverhältnisse zu diesen Dingen, zu der Sprache eingeht, weil Sprache, Gedankenwahrnehmung, IchWahrnehmung zunächst ablenken von der geistigen Welt und uns hinüberlenken sozial zu dem andern Menschen. Gewissermaßen erkaufen wir uns im gewöhnlichen physischen Leben das Dasein in der sozialen Welt dadurch, daß wir die Sprache durchhörig machen, die Gedanken durchsichtig machen, die Ich-Wahrnehmung durchfühlbar machen. Der orientalische Weise nahm wiederum die Undurchhörbarkeit des Wortes hin und lebte in dem Worte. Er nahm die Undurchsichtigkeit des Gedankens hin und lebte in dem Gedanken und so weiter. Wir im Abendlande sind mehr darauf angewiesen, bei dem Wege in die übersinnlichen Welten auf den Menschen zurückzusehen.

Da wollen wir uns erinnern, wie ja der Mensch eine gewisse Art von Sinnesorganisation auch in seinem Inneren trägt. Ich habe schon ausgeführt, wie der Mensch drei Sinne in seinem Inneren hat, durch die er sein Inneres geradeso wahrnimmt, wie wir sonst das Äußere wahrnehmen. Wir haben einen Gleichgewichtssinn, durch den wir uns in der uns als Menschen angemessenen Raumeslage erfühlen und dadurch mit dem Willen darinnen arbeiten können. Wir haben einen Bewegungssinn, durch den wir wissen, auch wenn wir im Dunkeln uns bewegen, durch inneres Erfühlen, daß wir uns bewegen, nicht bloß, daß wir etwa unsere eigenen Bewegungen an den andern Gegenständen wahrnehmen, an denen wir vorbeigehen. Wir haben einen Bewegungssinn. Und wir haben einen Lebenssinn, durch den wir unser Gesamtbefinden, unsere gewissermaßen innere Lebenssituation fortwährend im wechselnden Zustande wahrnehmen. Diese drei inneren Sinne, die arbeiten zusammen mit dem Willen gerade in den ersten sieben Lebensjahren des Menschen. Er richtet sich nach dem Gleichgewichtssinn, wird von einem Wesen, das nicht gehen kann, das später nur kriechen kann, ein Wesen, das aufrecht stehen und gehen kann. Das ist ein von dem Gleichgewichtssinne vermitteltes Bewirken des aufrechten Ganges, das ist ein Hineinstellen in die Welt durch den Gleichgewichtssinn. Ebenso bilden wir uns zum vollen Menschentum aus durch den Bewegungssinn, durch den Lebenssinn. Wer nun beobachten kann mit derselben Objektivität, wie man im Laboratorium, im physikalischen Kabinett beobachtet, wie der Mensch sein Geistig-Seelisches und Physisches entwickelt, der wird schon sehen, daß dasjenige, was da den Menschen durchorganisiert hat, und was vorzugsweise lebte in den ersten sieben Lebensjahren durchorganisierend in ihm, daß sich das emanzipiert und daß es später schon von der Zeit des Zahnwechsels an eine etwas andere Gestalt annimmt. Da ist der Mensch nicht mehr, ich möchte sagen, so intensiv mit seinem Inneren verbunden wie das Kind. Das Kind ist intensiv mit seinem Inneren, mit dem menschlichen Gleichgewicht, mit der menschlichen Bewegung, mit dem menschlichen Leben verbunden. Aber es entwickelt sich gleichzeitig mit diesem Emanzipieren von Gleichgewicht, Bewegung, Leben noch etwas anderes. Es entwickelt sich eine gewisse Einstellung von drei andern Sinnen, von dem Sinn des Geruchs, von dem Sinn des Geschmacks und von dem Sinn des Tastens. Es ist außerordentlich interessant, in allen Einzelheiten zu beobachten, wie sich das Kind — das geschieht allerdings in einem früheren Lebensalter deutlich, aber es ist später auch noch für den, der sich dazu schult, deutlich genug wahrzunehmen -, wie sich das Kind allmählich hineinfindet in das Leben, orientiert durch den Geruchssinn, den Geschmackssinn, den Tastsinn, und wie in einer gewissen Weise, während der Mensch aus sich herausschiebt Gleichgewicht, Bewegung, Leben, er aber mehr in sich hineinzieht all das, was die Qualitäten des Geruchssinnes, des Geschmackssinnes, des Tastsinnes sind. Das eine wird gewissermaßen ausgeatmet, das andere wird eingeatmet in einer längeren Lebensepoche, so daß sich begegnen in unserem Organismus die von innen nach außen drängenden Kräfte des Gleichgewichts, der Bewegung, des Lebens; die von außen nach innen drängenden Qualitätsorientierungen des Riechens, des Schmekkens, des Tastens. Und das wird dadurch bewirkt, daß ineinanderdrängen die eine Dreiheit der Sinne, die andere Dreiheit der Sinne. Dadurch, daß sie ineinanderdrängen, entsteht ein festes Selbstbewußtsein im Menschen, dadurch erfühlt sich der Mensch gewissermaßen erst als ein rechtes Selbst. Und geradeso wie wir abgeschlossen sind von der äußeren Geistigkeit — zu Recht selbstverständlich, denn wir würden sonst im physischen Leben keine sozialen Wesen werden -, wie wir abgeschlossen sind von dieser Geistigkeit durch Sprache, durch Gedankenwahrnehmung, durch Ich-Wahrnehmung gegenüber den andern Menschen, so werden wir, indem gerade Geruchs-, Geschmacks- und Tastqualitäten entgegenwachsen dem Gleichgewicht, der Bewegung, dem Leben, so werden wir nach innen abgeschnitten von dieser Dreiheit Leben, Bewegung und Gleichgewicht, die sich uns sonst unmittelbar enthüllen würden. Es lagern sich gewissermaßen die Erfahrungen des Geruchssinnes, des Geschmackssinnes, des Tastsinnes vor dasjenige, was wir erfahren würden an Gleichgewichtssinn, an Bewegungssinn, an Lebenssinn. Und darin besteht das Ergebnis jener Entwickelung zur Imagination, von der ich gesprochen habe, daß wir ebenso, wie der Orientale haltmacht bei der Sprache, um in ihr zu leben, haltmacht bei dem Gedanken, um in ihm zu leben, haltmacht bei der Ich-Wahrnehmung, um in ihr zu leben, um so in die geistige Welt nach außen hin hineinzudringen, gerade so, wie er haltmacht, wir durch die Imagination, indem wir gerade die äußere Wahrnehmung gewissermaßen vorstellunglos einsaugen, dazu gelangen, gewissermaßen jetzt die entgegengesetzte Tätigkeit auszuüben von der, die der Orientale gegenüber Sprache, Gedankenwahrnehmung und IchWahrnehmung ausübt. Er bleibt bei ihnen stehen. Er lebt sich in sie hinein. Der zur Imagination Strebende windet sich durch Geruch, Geschmack und Tastwahrnehmung hindurch, er dringt in das Innere hinein, so daß ihm dann, indem er unbehelligt bleibt von Geruchswahrnehmung, Tastwahrnehmung, Geschmackswahrnehmung, entgegentritt dasjenige, was zu erleben ist mit Gleichgewicht, Bewegung und Leben.

Das ist ein großer Moment, wenn man durch all das durchdringt, was ich charakterisiert habe als die Sinnesdreiheit des Geschmacks-, des Geruchs-, des Tastsinns, und gewissermaßen nackt vor sich hat, was in Bewegung, in Gleichgewicht und in Leben da ist.

Es ist interessant, zu verfolgen gerade nach solch einer Vorbereitung dasjenige, was so oftmals von abendländischer Mystik dargeboten wird. Gewiß, ich bin weit, ganz weit davon entfernt, das Poetische, das Schöne, das Phantasievolle mancher Mystiken zu verkennen. Gewiß, ich bewundere dasjenige, was zum Beispiel die heilige Therese dargeboten hat, Mechthild von Magdeburg und andere, selbst der Meister Eckhart und Johannes Tauler. Aber für denjenigen, der ein wahrer Geistesforscher ist, für den enthüllt sich das alles, es enthüllt sich all das, was entsteht, wenn man den Weg nach dem Inneren macht und nicht durchdringt durch die Region des Riechens, des Schmeckens, des Tastens. Lesen Sie einmal bei einzelnen Leuten, die besonders deutlich beschrieben haben das, was sie auf diese Weise erlebt haben. Sie reden von einem Schmecken des Inneren, von einem Schmecken in bezug auf dasjenige, was sich als Geistig-Seelisches im Inneren des Menschen auslebt; sie reden auch von einem Riechen, und von einem Tasten reden sie in einem gewissen Sinne, Und derjenige, der richtig zu lesen versteht, er wird gerade bei einer Mechthild von Magdeburg zum Beispiel oder bei einer heiligen Therese ganz deutlich sehen: Die gehen diesen Weg nach innen, aber sie kommen durch Riechen, Schmekken und Tasten nicht hindurch. Sie beschreiben zwar in schönen poetischen Bildern, aber doch nur dasjenige, was da heißt, man beriecht sich innerlich, man erschmeckt sich innerlich, man betastet sich innerlich.

Ja, die wahre Gestalt der Wirklichkeit zu sehen mit geistig wirklich entwickeltem Sinn, das ist nicht so angenehm, als sich erzählen zu lassen von einer wollüstigen Mystik — denn wollüstig ist sie doch -, die im Grunde genommen nur befriedigt einen raffinierten, nach innen gehenden Seelenegoismus. Wie gesagt, so bewundern, wie sie nur irgend sonst bewundert wird, kann ich schon diese Mystik auch, aber wissen muß man als wirklicher Geistesforscher, daß diese Mystik auf halbem Wege stehenbleibt, daß dasjenige, was in den schönen poetischen Bildern der Mechthild von Magdeburg und so weiter zum Vorschein kommt, der heiligen Therese, in Wirklichkeit doch nichts anderes ist als dasjenige, was man erriecht, erschmeckt, ertastet, bevor man zum wirklichen Inneren vordringt. Die Wahrheit ist unter Umständen unangenehm, vielleicht zuweilen grausam. Aber der heutigen Menschheit ziemtes sich nicht, seelisch rachitisch zu werden durch eine nebulose, unvollkommene Mystik. Der heutigen Zeit ziemt es sich allein, mit starker Geisteskraft in das wirkliche, menschliche Innere hineinzukommen, mit jener Stärke, die wir nicht umsonst für die äußere Welt viel mehr diszipliniert erlangt haben in der Naturwissenschaft. Diese Naturwissenschaft wird nicht verkannt. Diese Naturwissenschaft wird aufgenommen gerade nach ihrer disziplinierenden und methodischen Seite hin. Und gerade wenn man diese Naturwissenschaft sich angeeignet hat, dann weiß man auch auf der einen Seite zwar in der richtigen Art zu würdigen dasjenige, was von einer nebulosen Mystik kommt, aber man weiß auch, daß diese nebulose Mystik nicht dasjenige ist, was heute von einer geisteswissenschaftlichen Strömung getrieben werden darf, sondern daß von dieser geisteswissenschaftlichen Strömung klares Erfassen der eigenen menschlichen Wesenheit gesucht werden muß, damit dadurch klares geistiges Erfassen der Außenwelt zustande kommt.

Ich weiß, wenn ich nicht so spräche, wie ich der Wahrheit gemäß sprechen muß, ich könnte hinter mir haben alle die schwafelnden, nebulosen Mystiker, die die Mystik erstreben aus dem Grunde, um innerliche seelische Wollust zu befriedigen. Aber nicht darum kann es sich handeln in demjenigen, was von hier aus getrieben wird, sondern lediglich darum kann es sich handeln, Kräfte für das Leben zu finden, Kräfte, die als Geisteskräfte in unser wissenschaftliches und in unser soziales Leben hineinkommen können.

Wenn man so vorgedrungen ist bis zu dem, was im Gleichgewichtssinn, im Lebenssinn, im Bewegungssinn lebt, dann ist man zu dem gekommen, was man zunächst wegen seiner Durchsichtigkeit als die wahre innere Wesenheit des Menschen erlebt. Man weiß aus der Beschaffenheit der Sache selbst: Jetzt kann man nicht mehr tiefer hineinkommen. Aber man hat auch dann zunächst reichlich genug. Denn dasjenige, was die nebulosen Mystiker träumen, das findet man nicht. Aber man findet eine wirkliche Organologie, und man findet vor allen Dingen in seinem Inneren das wahre Wesen desjenigen, was im Gleichgewichte ist, was in Bewegung ist, was von Leben durchströmt ist. Das findet man in seinem Inneren.

Und dann, wenn man dies durchgemacht hat, dann ist etwas ganz Eigentümliches eingetreten. Dann bemerkt man zur rechten Zeit etwas. Ich habe ja vorausgesetzt, daß man vorher die «Philosophie der Freiheit» gedanklich durchgearbeitet hat. Man hat sie dann sozusagen stehen gelassen, und man hat den Weg der Kontemplation, der Meditation nach dem Inneren genommen. Man ist vorgedrungen bis zum Gleichgewicht, bis zur Bewegung, bis zum Leben. Man lebt in diesem Leben, in diesem Gleichgewicht, in dieser Bewegung. Und ganz parallel laufend, ohne daß wir etwas anderes getan haben, als daß wir diesen kontemplativen, diesen meditativen Weg gegangen sind, ganz parallel laufend ist jetzt aus unserer Gedankenarbeit gegenüber der «Philosophie der Freiheit» etwas ganz anderes geworden, das heißt dasjenige, was durch eine solche Philosophie der Freiheit im reinen Denken erlebt werden kann, das ist nun dadurch, daß wir auf einem ganz andern Gebiete innerlich seelisch gearbeitet haben, etwas ganz anderes geworden. Das ist voller geworden, inhaltschwerer geworden. Und während wir auf der einen Seite in unser Inneres gedrungen sind, die Imagination vertieft haben, haben wir dasjenige, was wir eigentlich erreicht haben durch die Gedankenarbeit in der «Philosophie der Freiheit», aus dem gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein herausgeholt. Wir haben aus Gedanken, die vorher mehr oder weniger abstrakt im reinen Denken geschwebt haben, inhaltsvolle Kräfte gemacht, die jetzt in unserem Bewußtsein leben, und es ist Inspiration geworden, was früher reiner Gedanke war. Wir haben die Imagination ausgebildet, und das reine Denken ist zur Inspiration geworden. Und indem wir auf diesem Wege fortschreiten, gelangen wir dazu, jetzt auseinanderhalten zu können — denn wir haben es auf zwei voneinander streng zu unterscheidenden Wegen gewonnen — dasjenige, was wir aus dem reinen Denken heraus bekommen als Inspiration, das Leben, das auf niederer Stufe ein Denken ist, dann ein zur Inspiration erhobenes Denken, und auf der andern Seite dasjenige, was wir erleben als Gleichgewichtszustand, als Bewegungszustand, Lebenszustand. Und wir können jetzt die beiden Erlebnisse, die beiden Erlebnisarten miteinander verbinden. Wir können das Äußere mit dem Inneren verbinden. Wir kommen wiederum durch die Verbindung von Inspiration und Imagination zur Intuition. Was haben wir da eigentlich vollzogen? Nun, das will ich Ihnen noch von einer andern Seite her charakterisieren. Da muß ich aber zunächst darauf aufmerksam machen, wie der Orientale weiter aufsteigt, nachdem er sich mantrisch gebildet hat, nachdem er in der Sprache, in dem Worte gelebt hat, dann dazu übergeht, nicht nur in dem Rhythmus des Sprachlichen zu leben, sondern dazu übergeht, in einer gewissen Weise bewußt den Atmungsprozeß zu erleben, ja den Atmungsprozeß in einer gewissen Weise künstlich zu erleben, indem er ihn variiert in der verschiedensten Weise. Das ist für ihn eine nächsthöhere Stufe wiederum nicht anwendbar unmittelbar auf unser Abendland. Was erlangt denn der orientalische Jogaschüler, indem er sich dem bewußten und regulierten, vermannigfaltigten Atmen hingibt? Oh, er erlebt dann im Einatmen etwas sehr Merkwürdiges. Er erlebt im Einatmen dasjenige, was in der Luft ist, wenn wir sie nicht bloß physisch auffassen,sondern wenn wir sie mit uns verbinden und dadurch sie geistig auffassen können. Im Einatmen erlebt der Mensch, der zu einem wirklichen Jogaschüler wird, dasjenige, was ihn durchorganisiert, geistig durchorganisiert, was seine Aufgabe nicht erschöpft hat in diesem Leben bis zum Tode, sondern was, durch die Geistigkeit der äußeren Luft in uns hereinkommend, in uns etwas erzeugt, das durch die Pforte des Todes durchgeht. Bewußt den Einatmungsprozeß erleben, heißt, dasjenige in sich erleben, was ein Dauerndes ist, wenn der Leib abgelegt wird. Denn bewußt den Atmungsprozeß erleben, das heißt, die Reaktion des Inneren auf die Einatmung erleben, das heißt, dasjenige erleben, was in unserem geistig-seelischen Dasein vorangegangen ist unserer Geburt, oder sagen wir unserer Empfängnis, was mitgearbeitet hat schon an unserer embryonalen Gestaltung, was dann weiter gearbeitet hat in unserer Kindheit innerhalb unserer Organisation. Bewußt den Atmungsprozeß erfassen, das heißt, sich erfassen jenseits von Geburt und Tod. Das Vorrücken von dem Erleben des Spruches, des Wortes zum Erleben des Atmungsprozesses hieß, weiter sich hineinleben in das inspirierte Erfassen des Ewigen im Menschen. Wir Abendländer müssen gewissermaßen dasselbe in einer andern Sphäre erleben.

Was ist denn eigentlich der Wahrnehmungsprozeß? Der Wahrnehmungsprozeß ist nämlich nichts anderes als ein modifizierter Einatmungsprozeß. Indem wir die Luft einatmen, drückt diese Luft auf unser Zwerchfell, auf unsere ganze Organisation. Es wird das Gehirnwasser durch den Rückenmarkskanal nach aufwärts nach dem Gehirn gedrängt. Dadurch wird eine Verbindung hergestellt zwischen der Gehirntätigkeit und dem Einatmen. Und dasjenige, was sich vom Einatmungsprozeß auf diese Weise im Gehirn spezialisiert, das wirkt in der Sinnestätigkeit als Wahrnehmen. So daß, ich möchte sagen, ein Ast des Einatmens das Wahrnehmen ist. Dann wiederum beim Ausatmen: Das Gehirnwasser geht hinunter, es drückt auf den Blutkreislauf. Es ist das Hinuntersteigen des Gehirnwassers verbunden mit der Willenstätigkeit, und das wiederum verbunden mit dem Ausatmen. Aber derjenige, der die «Philosophie der Freiheit» wirklich studiert, wird finden, daß in jenem Denken, das wir als das reine Denken erreichen, Wille und Denken zusammenfallen. Das reine Denken ist im Grunde eine Willensäußerung. Daher wird dasjenige, was Denken ist, was reines Denken ist, nun verwandt mit dem, was der Orientale erlebte im Ausatmungsprozeß. Es ist verwandt das reine Denken mit dem Ausatmungsprozeß, so wie das Wahrnehmen verwandt ist mit dem Einatmungsprozeß. Wir müssen gewissermaßen mehr zurückgeschoben nach dem Inneren des Menschen denselben Prozeß durchmachen, den der Orientale durchmacht mit seiner Jogaphilosophie. Diese Jogaphilosophie geht auf ein reguliertes Einatmen, Ausatmen, und ergreift so das Ewige im Menschen. Der Abendländer, was kann er tun? Er kann klar für sich seelisch zum Erlebnis machen auf der einen Seite die Wahrnehmung, auf der andern Seite das Denken. Und er kann dasjenige, was sonst abstrakt und formhaft nur in Ruhe verbunden wird, Wahrnehmen und Denken, in innerem Erleben verbinden, so daß er innerlich geistig-seelisch erlebt, was man physisch erlebt bei Einatmen, Ausatmen. Physisch erlebt man Einatmung, Ausatmung; in ihrem Zusammenklang erlebt man bewußt das Ewige. Im gewöhnlichen Erleben erlebt man die Wahrnehmung, das Denken. Indem man beweglich macht sein seelisches Leben, erlebt man den Pendelschlag, den Rhythmus, das fortwährende Ineinandervibrieren von Wahrnehmen und Denken. Und wie sich eine höhere Wirklichkeit in Einatmung und Ausatmung für den Orientalen entwickelt, so entwickelt sich, indem der Okzidentale in sich den lebendigen Prozeß der modifizierten Einatmung im Wahrnehmen, der modifizierten Ausatmung im reinen Denken entwickelt, indem er Begriff, Denken und Wahrnehmung ineinanderwebt, gewissermaßen ein geistig-seelisches Atmen anstelle des physischen Atmens der Jogaphilosophie. Und er zwingt sich auch allmählich hinauf durch diesen rhythmischen Schlag, durch dieses rhythmische Eratmen in Wahrnehmung und Denken zu der wahren geistigen Wirklichkeit in Imagination und Inspiration und Intuition. Und als ich in meiner «Philosophie der Freiheit» eben zunächst nur philosophisch darauf hindeutete, daß sich die wahre Wirklichkeit ergibt aus dem Ineinanderschlagen von Wahrnehmung und Denken, sollte, weil eben gerade diese «Philosophie der Freiheit» als innere Seelenkultur gedacht war, hingewiesen werden auf dasjenige, was der Mensch als Abendländer üben muß, um in die Geisteswelt selber hineinzukommen. Der Orientale sagt: Systole, Diastole; Einatmung, Ausatmung. Der Abendländer muß an die Stelle setzen: Wahrnehmung, Denken. Der Morgenländer sagt: Ausbilden des physischen Atmens -; der Abendländer sagt: Ausbilden des geistig-seelischen Atmens in dem Erkenntnisprozeß durch Wahrnehmen und Denken.

Das mußte gewissermaßen entgegengehalten werden demjenigen, was ja, ich möchte sagen, als die Sackgasse der abendländischen Geistesentwickelung erlebt werden konnte. Ich will Ihnen das auf folgende Weise charakterisieren. Es war im Jahre 1841, da veröffentlichte Michelet, der Berliner Philosoph, die nachgelassenen naturphilosophischen Werke Hegels. Hegel hatte zusammen mit Schelling am Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts an der Entstehung einer Naturphilosophie gearbeitet. Schelling als jugendlicher Feuergeist, er hatte in einer merkwürdigen Weise zunächst aus dem, was er intellektuelle Anschauung nannte, seine Naturphilosophie herauskonstruiert. Aber er kam an einen Punkt, da kam er nicht weiter. Er kam an den Punkt, wo er sich dann in die Mystiker vertiefte. Von seiner Vertiefung in die Mystik zeugen in so wunderbarer Weise seine Schrift «Bruno oder über das göttliche und natürliche Prinzip der Dinge» und seine schöne Schrift über die menschliche Freiheit oder den Ursprung des Bösen. Aber all das brachte es noch nicht weiter, und Schelling fing an zu schweigen, versprach nur immer, daß noch nachkommen sollte eine Philosophie, die erst die eigentlichen geheimen Kräfte, die sich in seiner früheren Naturphilosophie nur andeutend zeigten, enthüllen sollte. Und als die Hegelsche Naturphilosophie 1841 durch Michelet erschien, da war es so, daß Schelling dasjenige, was man von ihm erwartete, was er oftmals versprochen hatte, seine eigentliche Offenbarungsphilosophie, noch immer nicht der Welt mitgeteilt hatte. Er wurde nach Berlin berufen. Aber auch dasjenige, was er da darbieten konnte, es war nicht wirklicher Geist, der durchdringen sollte dasjenige, was er als Naturphilosophie begründet hatte. Er hatte gestrebt nach einer intellektuellen Anschauung. Das war aber auch so etwas, bei dem er stehenblieb, weil er nicht durch Imagination hineinkommen konnte in dasjenige Gebiet, von dem ich Ihnen heute gesprochen habe. Und so blieb er stecken. Und Hegel, der ein mehr rationalistischer Geist war, der nahm den Gedanken Schellings an, und, indem er reine Gedanken einführte über die Naturbeobachtung, führte er ihn weiter. Da entstand Hegels Naturphilosophie. Und so hatte man Schellings Versprechen einer Erzeugung der Natur aus dem Geiste heraus, das niemals erfüllt worden ist, und so hatte man Hegels Naturphilosophie, die verlassen wurde von der Naturforschung in der zweiten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts — allerdings unverstanden, aber sie mußte unverstanden bleiben, weil man gegenüber der wirklichen Naturbeobachtung, gegenüber der Phänomenologie der Natur kein Verhältnis gewinnen konnte zu dem, was an Gedankeninhalt die Hegelsche Naturphilosophie bot. Es ist, ich möchte sagen, ein wunderbares Zusammentreffen, wie Schelling von München nach Berlin geht, wie man dort Großes erwartet von ihm, wie er aber doch nichts zu berichten weiß. Es ist eine Enttäuschung gewesen für alle diejenigen, die geglaubt haben, aus dem reinen Gedanken heraus Offenbarungen über die Natur durch die Hegelsche Naturphilosophie zu erhalten. So hatte sich, ich möchte sagen, historisch erwiesen dadurch, daß Schelling bis zu intellektuellen Anschauungen vorgeschritten war, aber nun nicht zur wirklichen Imagination kommen konnte, dadurch, daß Hegel auch gezeigt hat, daß man mit dem reinen Denken, wenn man nicht zur Imagination kommt, auch nicht bis zur Inspiration, also bis zu den Naturgeheimnissen kommt, es hatte sich erwiesen, daß man dadurch in der Entwickelung des Abendlandes in eine Sackgasse hineingekommen war. Man wußte noch nichts gegenüberzustellen demjenigen, was vom Orienteherüberkam und den Skeptizismus aufgerufen hatte, man wußte nichts entgegenzustellen, was geistig durchtränkt war. Und gerade derjenige, der sich so recht liebend vertieft hat in dasjenige, was Schelling und Hegel sind, der dasjenige dadurch hat sehen können, mit Liebe hat sehen können, was nicht hat werden können durch die Philosophie des Abendlandes, der mußte streben nach Anthroposophie, nach anthroposophisch orientierter Geisteswissenschaft für das Abendland, damit wir etwas haben, was so aus dem Geiste herausschöpft, wie der Morgenländer aus dem Geiste herausgeschöpft hat durch Systole und Diastole und ihr Zusammenwirken. Wir im Abendlande haben das geistig-seelische Ineinanderklingenlassen von Wahrnehmung und Denken, indem wir aufsteigen zu einer Wissenschaft, die nicht bloß eine abstrakte, sondern eine lebendige Wissenschaft ist, die aber auch dafür diejenige Wissenschaft ist, die uns im Elemente der Wahrheit leben läßt. Und nach allem Fehlschlagen des Kantianismus, des Schellingianismus, des Hegelianismus brauchten wir eine solche Philosophie, die durch die Entdeckung des Geistesweges zeigen konnte, wie Wahrheit und Wissenschaft in ihrem wirklichen Verhältnisse zueinander sind; eine solche vergeistigte Wissenschaft, in der wirklich Wahrheit zum Heile der menschlichen Fortentwickelung leben kann.

Eighth Lecture

Yesterday I attempted to show how, within Oriental spiritual life, people sought to approach the realm of the supersensible world, and I pointed out how those who wished to embark on this path into the supersensible world, in a sense, removed the connecting bridge between themselves and other people, but but instead chose a different path than the one that initially leads from one person to another in social life through language, through thoughts, through self-perception. And I showed how, at first, attempts were made to hear what our fellow human beings want to tell us, what we want to understand in them, instead of through words, that is, to understand through words, to live in words. This living in words was then reinforced by shaping the words into certain sayings in which one lived, which one repeated, so that the power of the soul gained through this life in words was further strengthened by repetition. And I showed how, in this way, something was achieved in the state of the soul that could be called inspiration in the sense I have characterized, except that the wise men of the ancient Oriental world belonged to their race, their ego-consciousness was far less developed than in the later period of human evolution, and they therefore lived themselves into the spiritual world in a more instinctive way. And because the whole thing was instinctive, that is, it sprang from a healthy impulse of human nature, it could not lead to the pathological damage we have also had to discuss, even in the most ancient times. In later times, measures were taken by the so-called mysteries to prevent the onset of such damage, as I have tried to characterize it. I have now said that those who want to grasp the spiritual world within Western civilization must do so differently. Humanity has progressed in the meantime. Other forces of the soul have developed, and one cannot simply renew the old Eastern spiritual path today. One cannot want to return reactionarily to prehistoric times or to earlier historical periods of human development in the realm of spiritual life. For Western civilization, the path to the supersensible worlds is that of imagination. However, this imagination must be organically integrated into the rest of the soul life. And this can happen in the most diverse ways, just as the Eastern spiritual path was not predetermined in a completely unambiguous way, but could be followed in the most diverse ways. Today I want to describe the path to the spiritual world that is appropriate for Western civilization, as it could best be followed by someone who has gone through the scientific life of the West.

In my book “How to Know Higher Worlds,” I do characterize a sure path into the supersensible realms, but I characterize it in such a way that it is suitable for everyone, especially for those who have not gone through an actual scientific life. Today I want to characterize it specifically as being more suitable for scientists. Based on all my experience, I must regard the pursuit of what is presented in my Philosophy of Freedom as a kind of prerequisite for these scientists—we will hear in a moment what I mean by this—I must regard it as a proper prerequisite for this path of knowledge. This Philosophy of Freedom was not written with the intention with which books are usually written today. Today, books are written with the aim of simply informing the reader about the content of what is being communicated, so that, according to their particular prior knowledge, education, or scientific culture, they can take note of what is contained in a book. This is not actually what my Philosophy of Freedom is intended to be. That is why it is not particularly loved by those who only want to take note of a book. My Philosophy of Freedom is meant to be read page by page, engaging the reader's own immediate thought activity, so that the book itself is, in a sense, only a kind of musical score that must be read through inner thought activity in order to progress continuously from one thought to another out of one's own mind. Thus, this book definitely requires the reader's intellectual cooperation. And it also counts on what happens to the soul when it engages in such mental work. Those who do not admit to themselves that, once they have really completed this book through their own mental work, they have, in a sense, grasped an element of their soul life that they had not grasped before; those who do not feel that they have been lifted out of their ordinary mental images into a form of thinking free of the senses, in which one moves completely so that one feels how one has become free in this thinking from the conditions of physicality, do not actually read this “Philosophy of Freedom” in the right sense. And those who cannot admit this to themselves do not really understand it. One must be able to say to oneself, in a sense: Now, through this mental work I have done, I know what pure thinking actually is.

It is peculiar that what is supposed to become real in the soul when pursuing my “Philosophy of Freedom” is denied in its reality by most Western philosophers. Numerous philosophers argue that pure thinking does not exist, that all thinking must always be filled with at least some remnants, however diluted, of sensory perception. One would have to believe that philosophers who make such claims have never really studied mathematics, have never engaged with the difference between analytical mechanics and empirical mechanics. But our specialization has already progressed so far that today people often philosophize without having the slightest trace of an understanding of mathematical thinking. Basically, one cannot philosophize without at least having grasped the spirit of mathematical thinking. We have seen how Goethe related to this spirit of mathematical thinking, even though he himself said that he could not claim any special, specifically mathematical culture. So many people actually deny the existence of what I would like them to acquire through the study of the “Philosophy of Freedom.”

And now let us assume that someone, simply within the ordinary consciousness, were to work through this Philosophy of Freedom in the manner I have just described. Then, of course, he could not say that he was somehow within the supersensible world. For I have deliberately written this “Philosophy of Freedom” as it is, because it was intended to appear to the world first as a purely philosophical work. Just think what would have been achieved for anthroposophically oriented spiritual science if I had begun with spiritual scientific works. These spiritual scientific works would, of course, have been disregarded by all professional philosophers as pure dilettantism, as amateur literature. I had to write purely philosophically at first. I had to present to the world something that was thought in a purely philosophical sense, even though it went beyond ordinary philosophy. But of course, at some point the transition had to be made from purely philosophical and scientific writing to writing in the humanities. It was at a time when I had just been invited to write about Goethe's “Scientific Writings” as a special chapter in a German biography of Goethe. It was at the end of the 1990s. And so I was supposed to write the chapter on Goethe's “Scientific Writings.” I had already written it, it had already been delivered to the publisher, and immediately afterwards my writing appeared: “Mysticism in the Dawn of Modern Spiritual Life and Its Relationship to the Modern Worldview,” through which I led the way from the purely philosophical to the anthroposophically oriented. And after this work was published, I got my manuscript back from the publisher, accompanied only by the fee, so that I wouldn't complain, because that was the tribute paid to the law. But of course, those who had written this mystical work no longer wanted a chapter on Goethe's scientific development from someone who had such scientific pretensions.

Now, I assume that you have first worked through The Philosophy of Freedom in the manner I have described, starting from ordinary consciousness. Then you will be in the right frame of mind to undertake, in a good sense, what I described yesterday, albeit only in a few words, as the path into the imagination. This path into the imagination can be followed in a way that is appropriate to our Western civilization, by trying to devote oneself entirely to the external phenomenological world, allowing it to have an immediate effect on oneself, excluding thought, but in such a way that one nevertheless takes it in. Isn't it true that our ordinary mental life in the waking state proceeds in such a way that we perceive and, in fact, always saturate what we perceive with mental images, systematically interweave what we perceive with mental images in scientific thinking, systematize it through mental images, and so on? By acquiring the kind of thinking that gradually emerges in the course of The Philosophy of Freedom, one really does come into a position where one can work so sharply inwardly that, while perceiving, one excludes imagination, suppresses imagination, and surrenders oneself to external perception alone. But in order to strengthen the soul forces and, as it were, absorb the perceptions in the right sense without processing them with ideas while absorbing them, one can also do this by not judging these perceptions in the ordinary sense with ideas, but by creating symbolic or other images of what can be seen with the eye, heard with the ear, as well as heat images, tactile images, and so on. By bringing perception into a kind of flow, by bringing movement and life into perception, but in a way that does not happen in ordinary imagination, but in symbolic or artistic perception, one is much more likely to attain the power to allow oneself to be permeated by perception as such. One can prepare oneself well for such an insight simply by really educating oneself in the strictest sense to what I have characterized as phenomenalism, as working through phenomena. If one has truly sought to reach the material limits of knowledge, not lazily pushing through the veil of the senses and then searching for all kinds of metaphysical concepts in atoms and molecules, but rather using concepts to organize phenomena, to trace phenomena back to their original phenomena, then one already receives an education that can keep everything conceptual away from the phenomena. And if one then symbolizes, visualizes the phenomena, one gains a strong spiritual power to absorb the external world into oneself, so to speak, without concepts.

Of course, one does not have to believe that this can be achieved in a short time. Spiritual research requires far more work than laboratory or observatory research. Above all, it requires an intensive effort of one's own will. And if you have engaged in such symbolic mental imagery for a while, if you have made an effort to keep the images that you have created in this way, based entirely on the phenomena in your soul, present in your mind, images that would otherwise only pass by as you rush through life from sensation to sensation, from experience to experience, then you will have become accustomed to contemplating long and longer and longer on an image that you see through completely, that you have created yourself or that you have had someone advise you to create, so that it cannot be a reminiscence, you have become accustomed to resting contemplatively on such an image, and repeating this process over and over again, the inner strength of the soul is strengthened, and one finally becomes aware that one is experiencing something within oneself that one had no idea about before. At most, one can—but this should not be misunderstood—form a picture of what one is now experiencing, but only within oneself, by remembering particularly vivid dream images, except that dream images are always reminiscences and cannot be directly related to something external, but rather come to meet one, as it were, as a reaction from one's own inner being. So when you live through these images, it is something quite real, and you come to realize that you are now encountering within yourself the spiritual element that gives rise to the process of growth, that is the power of growth. You notice that you are entering a part of your human constitution that is within you, that connects with you, that is active within you, but that you previously only experienced unconsciously. How unconsciously?

Well, I have told you that from birth until the change of teeth, a spiritual-soul element thoroughly organizes the human being, and that it then more or less emancipates itself. But then, between the change of teeth and sexual maturity, this spiritual-soul element, which has, so to speak, submerged itself in the physical body, first stimulates the love impulse, but also many other things. But all this happens unconsciously. However, if one passes through such soul activities, as I have characterized them, with full consciousness, and follows this penetration of the spiritual-soul element into the physical organization, then one sees how such processes take place in the human being, how the human being is actually always, from birth, devoted to the outer world. Today, this surrendering to the external world is regarded as mere abstract perception or abstract cognition. That is not what it is. By being surrounded by a world of colors, by being surrounded by a world of sounds, by being surrounded by a world of warmth, in short, by being surrounded by everything that makes impressions on our senses, which in turn, through the processing of these impressions with our mental images, makes new impressions on our organization, by consciously experiencing all of this, we see that when we experience it unconsciously from childhood, we absorb something with the color impressions, with the sound impressions, which penetrates our organization as something spiritual. And when, for example, we take in the feeling of love between the change of teeth and sexual maturity, this is not something that grows out of our body, but is something that the cosmos gives us, something that the cosmos gives us through colors, through sounds, through currents of warmth that come to us. Warmth is something other than warmth, light is something other than light in the physical sense, sound is something other than sound in the physical sense. When we have sensory impressions, we are only conscious of what is, I would say, the outer sound, the outer color. But through this devotion, it is not what modern physics or physiology dreams of—ether movements, atomic movements, and the like—that is at work, but rather the spirit, the forces that make us what we are as human beings here in the physical world between birth and death. And by embarking on such paths of knowledge as I have characterized, we become aware of how we are organized from the outer world. We consciously follow what lives and breathes within us, above all by now gaining a clear sense that spirit is present in the outer world. It is precisely through phenomenology that we come to see clearly how spirit is present in the outer world. It is not by engaging in abstract metaphysics, but precisely through phenomenology that we arrive at the knowledge of the spirit, by perceiving, by bringing to consciousness what we otherwise do unconsciously, by perceiving how the spiritual penetrates us through the sensory world and organizes us.

I told you yesterday that the Eastern sage disregards, in a sense, the meaning of what is spoken, the meaning of what is thought, the meaning of self-perception, and perceives these things differently, enters into different mental states with regard to these things, to language, because language, perception of thoughts, and perception of the self initially distract us from the spiritual world and direct us socially toward other people. In a sense, in ordinary physical life we buy our existence in the social world by making language audible, thoughts transparent, and self-perception perceptible. The Oriental sage, on the other hand, accepted the inaudibility of words and lived in words. He accepted the opacity of thoughts and lived in thoughts, and so on. We in the West are more dependent on looking back to the human being on our way to the supersensible worlds.

Let us remember that human beings also have a certain kind of sensory organization within themselves. I have already explained how human beings have three senses within themselves through which they perceive their inner world in the same way as we perceive the outer world. We have a sense of balance through which we feel ourselves in the spatial position appropriate to us as human beings and can thus work within it with our will. We have a sense of movement through which we know, even when we move in the dark, through inner feeling, that we are moving, not merely that we perceive our own movements in relation to other objects we pass by. We have a sense of movement. And we have a sense of life, through which we constantly perceive our overall state of being, our inner life situation, so to speak, in its changing state. These three inner senses work together with the will, especially in the first seven years of human life. It is guided by the sense of balance and develops from a being that cannot walk, that can later only crawl, into a being that can stand upright and walk. This is an effect of the sense of balance that enables upright walking; it is a stepping into the world through the sense of balance. In the same way, we develop into full humanity through the sense of movement and the sense of life. Anyone who can observe with the same objectivity as in a laboratory or physics cabinet how human beings develop their spiritual, soul, and physical aspects will see that what has organized human beings throughout and what lived primarily in the first seven years of life, organizing everything within them, emancipates itself and takes on a somewhat different form later on, starting around the time when the teeth change. At that point, human beings are no longer, I would say, as intensely connected to their inner selves as children are. The child is intensely connected with its inner life, with human equilibrium, with human movement, with human life. But at the same time as this emancipation from equilibrium, movement, and life, something else develops. A certain attitude develops in three other senses: the sense of smell, the sense of taste, and the sense of touch. It is extremely interesting to observe in detail how the child — this happens clearly at an earlier age, but it is still clear enough later on for those who train themselves to perceive it — how the child gradually finds its way into life, guided by the sense of smell, the sense of taste, the sense of touch, and how, in a certain way, while the human being pushes out of himself equilibrium, movement, life, he draws into himself all that which are the qualities of the sense of smell, the sense of taste, the sense of touch. One is, so to speak, exhaled, the other inhaled during a longer period of life, so that the forces of balance, movement, and life, which push from the inside out, meet in our organism with the quality orientations of smell, taste, and touch, which push from the outside in. And this is brought about by the fact that the one trinity of senses presses against the other trinity of senses. Through this pressing against each other, a firm self-awareness arises in the human being, through which the human being feels, in a sense, for the first time as a true self. And just as we are cut off from the outer spirituality — rightly so, of course, for otherwise we would not become social beings in physical life — just as we are cut off from this spirituality through language, through the perception of thoughts, through the perception of the I in relation to other people, so, as the qualities of smell, taste, and touch grow in opposition to equilibrium, movement, and life, we become cut off inwardly from this triad of life, movement, and equilibrium, which would otherwise reveal themselves to us directly. The experiences of the sense of smell, the sense of taste, and the sense of touch are, so to speak, superimposed on what we would experience through the sense of balance, the sense of movement, and the sense of life. And therein lies the result of that development toward imagination of which I have spoken, that just as the Oriental stops at language in order to live in it, we stop at thought in order to live in it, we stop at self-perception in order to live in it, in order to penetrate outwardly into the spiritual world, just as he stops we, through imagination, by absorbing external perception in a sense without imagination, come to perform, as it were, the opposite activity to that which the Oriental performs in relation to language, thought perception, and self-perception. He stops at these. He lives himself into them. The person striving for imagination winds his way through smell, taste, and touch, penetrating into the innermost depths, so that, unhindered by smell, touch, and taste, he is confronted with that which is to be experienced with balance, movement, and life.

It is a great moment when one penetrates through all that I have characterized as the triune nature of the senses of taste, smell, and touch, and finds oneself, as it were, naked before what is there in movement, balance, and life.

It is interesting to observe, especially after such preparation, what is so often presented by Western mysticism. Certainly, I am far, very far from misunderstanding the poetic, the beautiful, the imaginative in some forms of mysticism. Certainly, I admire what, for example, Saint Teresa, Mechthild of Magdeburg, and others, even Meister Eckhart and Johannes Tauler, have presented. But for those who are true spiritual researchers, all this is revealed, everything that arises when one follows the path to the inner self and does not penetrate the realm of smell, taste, and touch. Read the writings of individuals who have described their experiences in this way with particular clarity. They speak of a tasting of the inner self, of a tasting in relation to what lives out as spiritual and soul-like within the human being; they also speak of a smelling, and in a certain sense they speak of a touching. And those who know how to read correctly will see very clearly, for example in Mechthild of Magdeburg or in Saint Teresa, that They follow this path inward, but they do not get through it by smelling, tasting, and touching. They describe it in beautiful poetic images, but they only describe what is meant by smelling oneself inwardly, tasting oneself inwardly, touching oneself inwardly.

Yes, seeing the true form of reality with a spiritually developed sense is not as pleasant as being told about a voluptuous mysticism — for voluptuous it is — which, when it comes down to it, only satisfies a refined, inward-turning egoism of the soul. As I said, I can admire this mysticism as it is admired everywhere else, but as a true spiritual researcher, one must know that this mysticism stops halfway, that what appears in the beautiful poetic images of Mechthild of Magdeburg and so on, of Saint Teresa, is in reality nothing other than what one smells, tastes, and feels before one penetrates to the real inner core. The truth may be unpleasant, perhaps even cruel at times. But it is not fitting for humanity today to become spiritually rickety through a nebulous, imperfect mysticism. It is fitting for the present age to enter into the real human inner life with strong mental power, with the strength that we have acquired in natural science for the external world, and not in vain. This natural science is not misunderstood. This natural science is accepted precisely because of its disciplining and methodical aspects. And precisely when one has acquired this natural science, then one knows, on the one hand, how to appreciate in the right way that which comes from a nebulous mysticism, but one also knows that this nebulous mysticism is not what should be driven by a spiritual-scientific current today, but that this spiritual-scientific current must seek a clear understanding of our own human nature, so that a clear spiritual understanding of the external world can come about.

I know that if I did not speak as I must speak in accordance with the truth, I would have behind me all the rambling, nebulous mystics who seek mysticism for the sake of satisfying their inner spiritual lust. But that cannot be the purpose of what is being pursued here. The sole purpose can be to find forces for life, forces that can enter our scientific and social life as spiritual forces.

When one has advanced to the point of what lives in the sense of balance, in the sense of life, in the sense of movement, then one has arrived at what one initially experiences as the true inner essence of the human being because of its transparency. One knows from the nature of the thing itself: now one cannot go any deeper. But even then, one has enough for the time being. For what the nebulous mystics dream of cannot be found. But one finds a real organology, and above all one finds within oneself the true essence of that which is in equilibrium, that which is in motion, that which is permeated by life. One finds this within oneself.

And then, when you have gone through this, something very peculiar happens. Then you notice something at the right moment. I have assumed that you have already worked through the “Philosophy of Freedom” in your mind. You have then left it there, so to speak, and taken the path of contemplation, of meditation into your inner being. You have advanced to equilibrium, to movement, to life. You live in this life, in this equilibrium, in this movement. And running completely parallel, without our having done anything other than following this contemplative, meditative path, running completely parallel, something completely different has now emerged from our mental work on The Philosophy of Freedom. namely, that which can be experienced through such a philosophy of freedom in pure thinking has now, through our inner spiritual work in a completely different realm, become something completely different. It has become fuller, richer in content. And while we have penetrated into our inner being and deepened our imagination, we have taken what we have actually achieved through our thinking work in The Philosophy of Freedom out of ordinary consciousness. We have transformed thoughts that previously floated more or less abstractly in pure thinking into meaningful forces that now live in our consciousness, and what was once pure thought has become inspiration. We have developed our imagination, and pure thinking has become inspiration. And as we continue along this path, we will be able to distinguish to distinguish between — because we have gained it in two strictly separate ways — what we obtain from pure thinking as inspiration, life, which at a lower level is thinking, then thinking raised to inspiration, and on the other hand what we experience as a state of equilibrium, as a state of movement, a state of life. And we can now connect the two experiences, the two types of experience, with each other. We can connect the external with the internal. Through the connection of inspiration and imagination, we arrive once again at intuition. What have we actually accomplished here? Well, I would like to characterize that for you from another angle. But first I must point out how the Oriental continues to ascend after they have educated themselves through mantras, after they have lived in language, in words, they then move on to not only living in the rhythm of language, but also to consciously experiencing the breathing process in a certain way, even artificially experiencing the breathing process in a certain way by varying it in many different ways. This is a higher stage for him, which again cannot be directly applied to our Western world. What does the Oriental yoga student achieve by devoting himself to conscious, regulated, and varied breathing? Oh, he experiences something very strange when he inhales. When he inhales, he experiences what is in the air when we do not merely perceive it physically, but when we connect with it and thereby perceive it spiritually. When inhaling, the person who becomes a true yoga student experiences that which organizes him spiritually, that which has not exhausted its task in this life until death, but which, entering into us through the spirituality of the external air, creates something within us that passes through the gate of death. To consciously experience the process of inhalation means to experience within oneself that which is permanent when the body is laid down. For to consciously experience the breathing process means to experience the reaction of the inner being to the inhalation, that is, to experience that which preceded our birth, or let us say our conception, in our spiritual and soul existence, that which already contributed to our embryonic formation and then continued to work in our childhood within our organization. Consciously grasping the breathing process means grasping oneself beyond birth and death. Advancing from the experience of the saying, of the word, to the experience of the breathing process meant living further into the inspired grasping of the eternal in the human being. We Westerners must, in a sense, experience the same thing in another sphere.

What exactly is the process of perception? The process of perception is nothing other than a modified process of inhalation. When we inhale air, this air presses on our diaphragm, on our entire organization. The cerebral fluid is pushed upward through the spinal canal to the brain. This establishes a connection between brain activity and inhalation. And that which is specialized in the brain in this way through the process of inhalation acts in the sensory activity as perception. So I would say that one branch of inhalation is perception. Then again, during exhalation, the cerebral fluid descends and presses on the blood circulation. The descent of the cerebral fluid is connected with the activity of the will, which in turn is connected with exhalation. But anyone who really studies the Philosophy of Freedom will find that in the thinking we attain as pure thinking, will and thinking coincide. Pure thinking is basically an expression of the will. Therefore, what thinking is, what pure thinking is, is now related to what the Oriental experienced in the exhalation process. Pure thinking is related to the exhalation process, just as perception is related to the inhalation process. We must, in a sense, push back further into the inner being of the human being and undergo the same process that Easterners undergo with their yoga philosophy. This yoga philosophy is based on regulated inhalation and exhalation, and thus grasps the eternal in the human being. What can Westerners do? They can clearly experience for themselves, on the one hand, perception and, on the other hand, thinking. And they can connect perception and thinking, which are otherwise only connected abstractly and formally in a state of rest, in their inner experience, so that they experience inwardly, spiritually and soulfully, what is physically experienced in inhalation and exhalation. Physically, one experiences inhalation and exhalation; in their harmony, one consciously experiences the eternal. In ordinary experience, one experiences perception and thinking. By making one's soul life flexible, one experiences the pendulum swing, the rhythm, the continuous vibration of perception and thinking. And just as a higher reality develops for Easterners in inhalation and exhalation, so too does it develop for Westerners as they develop within themselves the living process of modified inhalation in perception and modified exhalation in pure thinking, as they interweave concepts and and perception, they develop, so to speak, a spiritual-soul breathing in place of the physical breathing of yoga philosophy. And they also gradually force themselves upward through this rhythmic beat, through this rhythmic breathing in perception and thinking, to the true spiritual reality in imagination, inspiration, and intuition. And when, in my Philosophy of Freedom, I initially pointed out only philosophically that true reality arises from the intertwining of perception and thinking, it was necessary, precisely because this Philosophy of Freedom was intended as an inner soul culture, to point out what Westerners must practice in order to enter the spiritual world itself. The Oriental says: systole, diastole; inhalation, exhalation. The Westerner must substitute: perception, thinking. The Oriental says: training physical breathing; the Westerner says: training spiritual-soul breathing in the process of cognition through perception and thinking.

This had to be countered, so to speak, to what I would call the dead end of Western spiritual development. Let me characterize it in the following way. In 1841, Michelet, the Berlin philosopher, published Hegel's posthumous works on natural philosophy. Hegel, together with Schelling, had worked on the development of a philosophy of nature at the end of the 18th century. Schelling, as a youthful firebrand, had initially constructed his philosophy of nature in a remarkable way from what he called intellectual intuition. But he reached a point where he could go no further. He reached the point where he immersed himself in mysticism. His immersion in mysticism is wonderfully evidenced by his work “Bruno, or on the Divine and Natural Principle of Things” and his beautiful work on human freedom or the origin of evil. But all this did not get him any further, and Schelling began to remain silent, promising only that a philosophy would follow which would reveal the actual secret forces that had only been hinted at in his earlier natural philosophy. And when Hegel's natural philosophy appeared in 1841 through Michelet, Schelling had still not communicated to the world what was expected of him, what he had often promised, his actual philosophy of revelation. He was called to Berlin. But even what he was able to present there was not the real spirit that was supposed to permeate what he had established as natural philosophy. He had strived for an intellectual view. But that was also something he got stuck on because he could not enter the realm I have spoken to you about today through imagination. And so he remained stuck. And Hegel, who was a more rationalistic spirit, took up Schelling's idea and, by introducing pure thoughts about the observation of nature, carried it further. This gave rise to Hegel's natural philosophy. And so we had Schelling's promise of the creation of nature out of the spirit, which was never fulfilled, and so we had Hegel's philosophy of nature, which was abandoned by natural science in the second half of the 19th century — albeit misunderstood, but it had to remain misunderstood because, in contrast to the actual observation of nature, in contrast to the phenomenology of nature, it was impossible to relate to the content of Hegel's natural philosophy. It is, I would say, a wonderful coincidence that Schelling went from Munich to Berlin, that great things were expected of him there, but that he had nothing to report. It was a disappointment for all those who believed that Hegel's philosophy of nature would provide revelations about nature through pure thought. Thus, I would say, it was historically proven by the fact that Schelling had advanced to intellectual views but could not now arrive at real imagination, and by the fact that Hegel also showed that with pure thinking, if one does not arrive at imagination, one does not arrive at inspiration, that is, at the secrets of nature. it had been proven that this had led the development of the West into a dead end. There was nothing to counter what had come over from the East and had given rise to skepticism; there was nothing spiritually saturated to set against it. And precisely those who had immersed themselves so lovingly in what Schelling and Hegel were, who had been able to see with love with love what could not come about through Western philosophy, had to strive for anthroposophy, for anthroposophically oriented spiritual science for the West, so that we might have something that draws from the spirit in the same way that the people of the East drew from the spirit through systole and diastole and their interaction. We in the West have the spiritual and soul-like interplay of perception and thinking, in that we ascend to a science that is not merely abstract, but a living science, which is also the science that allows us to live in the element of truth. And after all the failures of Kantianism, Schellingianism, and Hegelianism, we needed a philosophy that could show, through the discovery of the spiritual path, how truth and science are really related to each other; a spiritualized science in which truth can truly live for the good of human development.