Historical Necessity and Freewill
GA 179
9 December 1917, Dornach
2. Concerning the World of the Dead
As I have already remarked, we shall consider certain matters during these lectures which will then culminate, tomorrow or the next day, in an exposition of Historical Necessity and Free Will, will culminate by my having to show in what sense an historical event is necessary, and in what sense such an event—as something which, generally speaking, interferes in the soul-sphere of human life—could also be otherwise than it is. Indeed, at the present time—when such important occurrences are interfering in human life—this is a problem which is of very special, deeply penetrating significance; for, in face of the sad, catastrophic events of the present day (the war) every human being must indeed ask himself the question:—in how far are such happenings—and directly this present one—dependent on a certain necessity and in how far could the present occurrence have turned out differently, had it been able to assume a different aspect.
As we indicated, it will be our aim during these lectures to reply to this large, inclusive question with means that we can have at our disposal now in the occult basis that is to be explained in public lectures. But we must proceed from a more inclusive consideration of human life. We must deepen ourselves somewhat, from a certain aspect, in human nature itself For, as you are perhaps able to gather directly from the public lectures held recently, in human life the forces of that world are playing in which the human being finds himself between death and a new birth. Into this life—much more intensely than one imagines—are the forces playing, in which the human being is embedded, as the so-called dead. We are, as human beings, so fashioned—in the last lecture I drew attention more to the physical aspect—that in reality, the threshold between the everyday physical world and the spiritual world, cuts right through our midst. If we hold in mind our everyday life, and what we have considered the last time more from the physical side, today more from the side of the soul, then we may say: While we are incarnated here in the physical body, our human life runs its course in such a way that we have active in us, first, everything that can be experienced through the senses during our life, everything that is outspread around us, so to say, as a tapestry of the sense impressions, and from which we receive knowledge through our senses. Upon this world, then, everything is built which we elaborate out of this sense world, but which we also, independently of it, are able to interpenetrate in our thought life. When, however, we unite sense life and thought life, we have in reality everything in which we live with our usual waking consciousness.
From the moment we awaken in the morning until the moment we fall asleep, we are awake in reality only in our sense impressions and in our thought life. We are not awake at all, in the full sense of the word, in our feelings, in our feeling life. And there, between the thought life and the feeling life, practically unnoticed for the everyday consciousness, lies the threshold. For what interpenetrates our feeling life as a deeper reality does not actually come to consciousness at all in the human being. The feelings themselves do [not?] come to consciousness in him. They surge up and down out of a subconscious world. But the consciousness has really nothing more to do with feeling that we in sleep have to do with our dreams. Therefore it was possible recently to say here in Switzerland in public lectures:—While the human being lives in his feeling life, he is actually asleep and dreaming. The dream life extends itself over into our waking life. We are really continuously in a dream state from the moment of going to sleep to that of awakening, but only those dreams are remembered or enter our consciousness that are most strongly connected with our physical existence; dreaming continues on throughout the entire sleep life. Only in the deeper layers of our consciousness do we sleep, so to say, dreamlessly. But this dreaming and dreamless sleep life goes over into our feeling life, into the life of our affections. And we know no more of the reality, of the actual content of the ordinary consciousness in the non-clairvoyant consciousness of our feeling life, than we know what actually occurs when the images of the dream life run their course before us. Therefore it was also stated in these lectures that the human being does not inwardly experience the content of what is termed “History” with waking consciousness, but dreams it through, goes through it in a dream. History is what may be termed a cosmic dream of the human being. For the impulses that live in history live actually in feeling and emotional impulses. He dreams, while he inwardly experiences, history. Thus the life of feeling lies quite underneath the threshold of the real, waking consciousness. In this soul relationship also the boundary between the conscious and the unconscious life cuts right across the middle of the human being. In his will life the human being sleeps completely. For with his everyday consciousness he knows nothing about what actually lives in the will. His ordinary consciousness lives in the reality that expresses itself in the will in exactly the same way in which he lives in deep sleep. He follows consciously only that which, proceeding out of the will, has gone over into action. In this he awakens; in the execution of the will he cannot awaken. Therefore the philosophers continually quarrel about the freedom and the non-freedom of the will, because they are unable to penetrate into the region that can only be seen into with clairvoyant consciousness, the region out of which the will really draws its impulses.
Thus—I accentuate it once more—in the soul relationship also, the threshold lies between the actual physical world of waking life and the world which remains subconscious for him, lies in the midst of the human being himself, for this human being.
Now everything which the human being experiences and lives with between death and a new birth plays right into his life, insofar as it is the life of the feeling and the will—that is, insofar as it has been dreamt and slept through. What the dead live through is actually in the world in which we are living, in as far as we feel and will. Only we do not know with ordinary consciousness the realities that live in feeling and willing. If we could live through the reality which gives the basis of the feeling life, if we would live through especially the reality giving the basis of the willing life, just as in waking we live through the reality of the sense perceptions and the thought conceptions—the conceptions indeed to a minor degree, nevertheless to a certain degree—then would the departed, the man who has passed through the portals of death, be just as much beside us, in continual association with us, as someone who still walks about with us here on the physical plane, so that we are able to receive impressions from him in our waking consciousness by means of our senses and thought life. What is living in the impulses of the departed dead ascends continually within our feeling life, into the life of our will impulses. And only because we dream and sleep this away do we feel separated from the dead with whom we were associated.
In reality, however, the world in which the so-called dead live is quite different from the world in which we live while we are incarnated in the physical body. For observe, when you ask quite seriously: what then exists for the waking non-clairvoyant consciousness from the time of waking until going to sleep? The answer is: Only that which can be lived through in the world which is spread out as a tapestry of the sense impressions and also in the world we fashion out of it for ourselves by means of our thought conceptions. From this world, in the first place, everything belonging to the so-called mineral kingdom, for which the sense organs are used in perceiving, is not directly existent for the dead. To this mineral world belong, for example, also the stars, the sun and moon; in general everything belongs to it that is perceptible to the senses, and to it belongs also a large region of the plant world. These are regions that primarily do not lie open to the spiritual- and soul-eyes of the dead.
On the other hand there begins to open up already for the soul-eyes of the dead the world of which we are more or less unconscious when we direct our glance toward it—the glance which is of course veiled by the sense world—that is to say the world of impulses, of forces which live in the animals. This is for the dead the lowest world, in exactly the same way that the mineral world is the lowest world for us here in the physical body. Just as for us the plant world, which sprouts forth out of the mineral kingdom, builds itself up, so, for the dead, the human world, as soul world, erects itself upon the foundation that lives in the animal world. And just as the animal world forms the third category, which erects itself upon the mineral and plant world, so the kingdom of the Angels, Archangels, etc., forms a higher kingdom in the world of the dead.
The entire environment into which the departed one is transposed is thereby different from the environment in which we ourselves live in the physical body. For just conceive for a moment how it would be, were everything you perceive with the senses taken out of the world which you perceive with your physical body, about which you, in your physical body, form concepts. There would be something remaining over and above for the non-clairvoyant perception which can only have the appearance of a dream world, a world which can only be dreamed, which cannot live any more strongly in the consciousness than a dream. But the distinction becomes clearer if we hold the difference in mind in yet another way. Just notice that as long as we are incarnated in the physical body, the essential thing that lends character to our lives (the chief characteristic) is that we (although inwardly the matter is difficult as you know from other lectures) are able to have the consciousness that whatever we do with the beings of the mineral and plant kingdoms—as a result of our intercourse with them—remains relatively a matter of indifference to them. We act indeed under the influence of this thought just expressed. We break the stone calmly and have the idea that we do not cause the stone pain, nor also give it any joy. You know that inwardly the matter is somewhat different: but in as far as we human beings are in touch with the surrounding mineral world, we think with a certain justification that joy and pain is not at once aroused when we break a stone to pieces or do something similar.
In a like manner do we relate ourselves to the plant world. The human beings are now very rare who, for example, feel a sort of pain, have a somewhat similar feeling when a flower is plucked. The individuals, who in a certain sense still prefer to have the rose on the rosebush than to have the rose bouquet in the room, are not at all so numerous. It is only with the animal world that we begin to bring our human nature directly into relationship with the surrounding world. And yet let it be said once more:—the human beings are just now quite rare among present day people who have a feeling—only distantly similar to be sure—when plucking roses similar to the one they would have were the heads of animals being torn off in order to bind them together in a nosegay:—even among anthroposophists I have found that not everyone always prefers to have roses on the rose-bush—although indeed the feeling has already progressed so far that there has never been, let us say, a bouquet of nightingale heads presented in a hall! Now we are beginning to feel how the life that extends itself out of us continues on into our surrounding world.
The departed has no such condition. For him nothing exists at all in the environment for which he could not have the feeling that if he were only to stretch out a finger—this is now expressed quite symbolically, in imagery—then what is accomplished—through the sticking out of his finger, indeed, through any action whatever, yes, through everything done by the dead—would not bring about, would not release joy and pain in the environment. He does not enter at all into relationship with his surroundings unless he awakens joy and pain, unless there exists an echo of joy and pain. If you do something after you have passed through the portals of death, then through your action, wherever it may be, pain or joy, tension or relaxation of something is continually occurring which is similar to the feeling life. If we knock on a table we feel that it does not pain the table. The one who is dead can never carry out an action without knowing that he lives and weaves, not only into the living element, but into the living element filled with feeling. The feeling-filled incitement is spread out over his entire environment.
From another aspect you will find that described in the corresponding chapter of my book Theosophy. This world of incitement filled with feeling lives thus upon the lowest level there above in the animal kingdom. And just as we are acquainted with a certain external side of the mineral kingdom by means of our sense perceptions, so is the departed dead familiar, over the extent of his whole world, with the inner side, not with the outer form, but with the inner aspect of animal life. This animal life is the lowest basis upon which he lives, upon which he fashions himself, upon which he erects his existence. And a large amount of work of the dead consists in their placing themselves in direct relationship to the world of living animal creatures. Just as we here on earth, from childhood on, place ourselves in connection with the dead mineral world, so do we after death establish ourselves continually on a broad and expanding, growing relationship to the world of the living animal. This world the dead person learns to know on all sides. This world the departed learns to know through having to penetrate step by step all the secrets which here on earth are concealed from him, just as that is concealed from his soul which slumbers underneath his feeling life, for it is the same thing.
Granted, such a question as the one I now intend to interject cannot be allowed as a proper scientific one. But it can nevertheless point toward something behind which real relationships exist. It can be asked: why then is there so much really concealed from the human being here in the physical world by the governing power of the all-penetrating world wisdom? We can ask, why is that concealed into which the dead must be initiated, the mysteries of the construction of the whole animal world?
Directly when we attempt to answer such a question, we plunge into the deepest of all mysteries of existence. And in these considerations we shall have to try to understand this question also. In the first place, however, we must perceive how this comprehension of the inner side of the animal life really takes place.
Here I might proceed, in order not to become theoretical, from a fact of recent history. You know that in a certain external way human historical consciousness has experienced a change in modern times through so-called Darwinism. There has been an endeavor to find the forces by means of which the organisms evolve from the so-called imperfect condition. The Darwinists have named several kinds:—primarily the principle of special selection, survival of the fittest, the adjustment to environment, etc., I do not intend to come to you with these things which you indeed can read in every handbook on Darwinism, even in every encyclopedia. But I wish to point out that those are external, abstract principles: that for those who look deeper, nothing at all is said thereby. What actually happens is not shown when it is said: the perfection occurs through the selection of the fittest, the others gradually dying out and the fittest surviving. Here nothing is actually said about the forces, about the impulses that actually live in the animal kingdom—in order that these creatures may be able not only first to perfect themselves but also to be able to frame their life correspondingly in the ordinary present-day world. What really acts in the forces of selection, in forces that are put forward by Darwinism as forces of selection, as forces that are of a purely mechanically purposeful character. It is the dead working there. It belongs to the most astonishing and impressive experiences which can be made in the circle of the dead, to discover that just as here there are smiths and joiners and others who work in the world of mechanics, in the handicrafts, and thereby create the physical sensible basis of life here, so in the spirit realm, beginning with the animal kingdom and upwards, do the dead work. While the animal kingdom here in many respects is such that we feel it to be an inferior one—however, the mineral world lies indeed still lower—yet the very basis of the work of the dead is the furthering of the animal kingdom. Therefore, the departed become accustomed to living in all the skillfulness that is concealed from him, through the fact of his world of feeling being plunged down into the life of animal existence, during the life between birth and death.
You see, we come here to the point of view that until our age was held more or less secret by the brotherhoods that believed, partly justly, partly unjustly, that other men were not ripe enough for such things. If you gain the knowledge of what is related to the animal nature in the world of the dead, if you look about, you then see that all this belongs to the living element filled with feeling. The human being has also this living element filled with feeling in his soul. But in what way? Between birth and death he possesses it in such a way that were it not locked up in his subconsciousness he could at every moment employ this living element filled with feeling, which exists in the period between birth and death, for the destruction of the remainder of this element in the world. So just imagine what that really means. You yourself, in your personal life, live as a living-element-filled-with-feeling, which, however, is enclosed in the boundaries that are drawn into the physical human being. If human beings were to have this element generally, freely at their disposal—anthroposophists will already be more cultivated in this regard—then they could, in every instance, employ these concealed forces to destroy the living element filled with feeling that is lying in their environment.
The animal nature in the human being is primarily, even in the most exact meaning of the word, a destructive one. And it is even endowed with the capacity to destroy. And when the individual has passed through death's door, then it is his task above everything to tear out of his soul all the impulses that have then become free in such a way that there is really a very great deal remaining of the desire to destroy the living, to kill the living. And it can be said, that to have respect and reverence for all living things is something that the departed must learn above everything else. This reverence for everything living is something that can be looked upon as the self-evident evolution of the departed. So just as we here with inner participation follow a child which as a matter of course evolves from a small infant onward, gradually from day to day, from week to week, just as we follow up with this child the way the soul takes hold of the fleshly bodily nature, having great joy in what happens without the cooperation of the so-called free will, in what occurs there through the pure organic forces of the soul; so in a similar manner, when we follow up the course taken by the departed from the day of his death onward through his life after death, we again behold the development of the deepest reverence for all living beings in the environment, a development from which free will has been withdrawn.
This is something which, as it were, happens like an external side in the departed, just as with the child this occurs as an external side through its growing up, by its traits becoming more expressive. What increases externally in the child to our joy, in like manner increases in the departed by our discovering something radiating from him, more and more through his holding every living thing sacred in such an exalted way. But in this connection an important difference occurs between the life after death and the life here on earth. The life here has concealed by a veil just that in which the departed must deepen himself. We perceive the world through our senses and form for ourselves certain laws which we call the laws of nature, according to which we then form round about us our mechanical instruments, our tools. What we erect round about us according to the laws of nature is indeed essentially a world of the dead. We must even kill the plant, even the tree, when we wish to place its wood at the service of our mechanical arts. And again it belongs to the most staggering knowledge, that in reality everything which our senses teach us, when we apply it by means of our will, is something destructive and cannot be anything else but something destructive.
Even when we create a work of art we must take part in the world of destruction. What we thus create first arises out of destruction. A beneficent world wisdom has only caused us at first to shrink back, as human beings, from placing what lives (generally speaking, from the animal-world upward) at the service of mechanical art. In a certain higher sense, however, everything lives in the world. You will already realize this from the various accounts given during the course of the year. But what do we do in reality when we place at the service of mechanical art that which we perceive through our senses and combine through our understanding? We continually carry death into life. Even a Raphael painting cannot come into being unless death is carried into life. Before a Raphael painting arises it contains more life than afterwards. In the universe this is compensated only through the fact that souls appear who enjoy the Raphael painting and receive from it an impulse, a strong impression. The impulse, the impression which the creating or enjoying soul receives, this alone can help to overcome the forces of death, even when the highest treasure, the so-called highest spiritual possessions of mankind are created here on the physical plane. Essentially, the earth will be destroyed because through their mechanical acts human beings carry death into the earth in such a strong measure. The earth will no longer be able to live, because the forces of death prevail over that which can be saved and carried over into the world of Jupiter, beyond the decay of the physical earth. But out of what human beings have created by weaving together death and life—out of what they have thus created—they will have regained a soul content which they will then carry over into the world of Jupiter.
Death or the destruction of what is living, continually weaves into life, more than words can say; it weaves in human activity itself, through the fact that between birth and death [unreadable] human activity is intimately interwoven with the sense of [unreadable]. Indeed, consciousness arises because death weaves itself into life. Man would not accomplish his task on earth, as far as consciousness is concerned, were he not called upon to weave death into life. Even within ourselves we kill the life of the nerves the very moment in which we form a thought; for a really living nerve cannot form thoughts. In recent public lectures I have said that—“We enter into the life of our nerves through a constant death-process.”
In this respect the life between death and a new birth is the exact opposite. There it is essential for the human soul to acquire the habit of holding holy all that is living, of permeating the living with ever more and more life.
In this manner the life between birth and death is connected with death; the life between death and a new birth, with the life of the whole. An animal kingdom lives upon the earth only through the fact that man dies and sends his impulses from the spiritual world into the life of the animals.
The second thing which man learns to know after death is the kingdom of the human soul itself, regardless of whether these human souls are embodied here in physical bodies or have already passed through the gate of death. After death, man faces the animal world with the feeling that when he carries out an action, something experiences joy, or another being, at least something possessing being, suffers pain. He knows that he strikes against living reality when his spiritual force alone hits against this. Here it is more a universal living and weaving within living reality. In regard to the familiarity with what exists in our own human sphere after we are dead, it is so, that when another soul enters into a relationship with us, after we ourselves have passed through the gate of death, we become aware that our own life-feeling is either strengthened or diminished, according to the way in which we face this soul. Through our relation to a certain soul, regardless of whether it dwells here upon the earth or in the spiritual world, we feel that we become inwardly strengthened. Our companionship with this soul strengthens us in a certain way; our inner forces become stronger and at the same time more alive. We meet this soul and feel that it makes us more awake than we would have been otherwise. An intimate sense of life streams toward us with a certain intensity, through our companionship with this soul. Instead, the relationship with another soul may weaken us in the direction of certain forces and dim down our life, as it were.
Our companionship with souls consists therein that we feel our own life surging livingly in this relationship with the others. We live out our life of feeling and will as human beings between birth and death without knowing that the souls of the dead live in the waves of this life of feeling and will, which we sleep and dream away. They are always there; they live in the waves of our own feeling and will, and they live there in such a way that they experience this life with us. While we experience the surrounding world through our senses as something external, the dead live in the impulses of our feelings and will; they are far more intimately bound together with us than we, insofar as we are physically embodied, are bound together with our surroundings.
It is so that this life—or better, this experiencing, this inner presence in life—of the dead, develops gradually in accordance with the conditions that have been spun out during our life here. Assuredly we live together with all souls after death; this is true, but we know nothing about it. Relationships set in slowly and gradually; namely, with souls with whom we have formed connections during our life between birth and death. We cannot form new relationships, original connections with other human beings during the life between death and a new birth; we can form no such connections originally and directly. When we have loved or hated someone here, i.e., when we were connected with him either in a positive or in a negative way, this again rises from a gray spiritual depth, in the gradual awakening of the life after death, so that we live within these souls, as I have just described.
Thus, a great part of this experiencing, or this inner life-presence of the dead, consists in the fact that everything that exists in the form of a link with other souls, during our last or earlier incarnations, gradually rises up from a gray spiritual depth. This can widen out—and in the case of many departed souls it widens out very soon after death—but in an immediate way. Someone may die; he may have stood in some kind of relationship to a soul dwelling either on the earth or in the spiritual world. This relationship appears before him once more after death, as I have described just now. But this soul with whom he is linked up has relations with other souls, with whom, perhaps, he has never come into contact during any of his lives between birth and death. But here, after death, such souls can establish an indirect contact with the so-called dead soul, and thus enter into relationship with him.
But, as I have already said, these are never direct connections, for they are always mediated by the souls with whom we are linked up karmically through our physical life. The connection with souls where no relationship has been established during physical life is always quite a different one, and is transmitted through the soul who was connected with us in physical life.
You can easily realize, now, that first there are direct, then indirect relationships. Through the fact, however, that all souls are more or less connected with one another throughout the earth, and that during his long life between death and a new birth, man forms, indirectly at least, many new connections—through this fact, the human being enters a very wide field of mutual experience with other souls, if we also take into consideration these indirect relationships. Even when we are here on earth we have already within us this living-into other souls. In the spiritual world we have lived together with innumerable souls, over and over again. The feeling of being at one with all souls, which an abstract philosophy considers only abstractly, and discusses as an abstract at-oneness, has its quite concrete side. Namely, that souls are scarcely to be found over the whole earth with whom there is not at least a distant and indirect connection. We must grasp this fact as concretely as possible, then this will lead us to something real. What the departed experiences is thus a gradual growing into and awakening into a world based, in a wider sense, on his karma. An inward brightness that increases more and more spreads, as it were, over this world, as our experiences become richer in this second realm, which is based upon the animalic realm, just as our experiences in the plant realm are based upon the mineral realm. Our experiences become ever richer and richer.
Imagine this experience extending in all concrete directions, and you will obtain a great deal of that which permeates the soul of the departed between death and a new birth; for all thoughts that connect us in any way with other souls are bound up with this experience. Herein lies an infinitely rich world. Essentially is it so (you will gather this from the cycle on Life Between Death and Rebirth) that during the first half of this life between death and a new birth, the development is more filled with wisdom, more permeated with wisdom. In a wise way man becomes accustomed to the connections that he gradually draws up again out of the spiritual depth. He becomes familiar with all this in a very wise way. Essentially, the threads leading to all karmic relationships of a direct or indirect nature begin in what I have called in the Mystery Plays “The Midnight Hour of Being.” Then follows the further working out, and then an element of force, similar to the will, but only similar, not exactly the same—enters into the life of the soul. This element of force, similar to the will, makes the human being stronger and stronger. Above all, it strengthens those impulses in him that are added to the wisdom-filled survey of the world, as elements and impulses pertaining to the will, as impulses of force.
A certain form of will becomes active in man during the second half of the life between death and a new birth. If we observe this will (we can do this especially in the case of souls who, through this or that circumstance, have a shorter or a shortened life between death and new birth) we find that the will takes a peculiar direction, which may be characterized by saying—the will arises in order to wipe out in some way the traces of our life, the traces of karma.
Please grasp this quite clearly. Such a will, aiming at the effacement of the traces of karma, becomes more and more evident in man. This effacement of the traces of karma is connected with the deepest secrets of human life. Were man to have a continual and full survey of the wisdom which he can acquire very soon, comparatively soon, after death, then there would be numberless human beings who would prefer to wipe out the traces of their existence, rather than enter into new lives. The elaboration of our earlier lives into a karmic connection, which we achieve, can only be achieved because we are dulled by certain beings of the higher hierarchy during the second half of the life between death and a new birth; we are paralyzed in regard to the light of wisdom, so that we restrict our activity and our will- impulses more and more. And we must say that the aim of this is to restrict them in such a way that we create what can then become united with a physical human body in the stream of heredity, and can live out its earthly destiny in this physical body.
We can only understand these thoughts fully when we consider earthly destiny itself. How dream-like this earthly destiny is for man on earth! As a child he accustoms himself gradually to the conditions of earthly life. What we call destiny comes to him in the form of single life experiences. Out of the woof of these life experiences, something is formed which is in reality man himself. For think what you would be as far as the present day, had you not lived through your own particular destiny! You can indeed say—I myself am what I have experienced as destiny. You would be quite another human being had you experienced a different destiny. And yet, how strange destiny seems to be, how little interwoven with what man calls his ego! In how many countless cases the ego feels itself struck by destiny! Why? Because what we ourselves do towards the molding of our destiny remains hidden in the subconsciousness. What we experience takes up its place in the world of sense-experience and in the world of thoughts. It merely strikes against our feeling life. Our feeling life remains passive to this. What we have in common with the realm of the dead springs forth actively out of our feeling life and out of the life of the will impulses. What springs forth in this way, and what we ourselves do without our consciousness, by dreaming and sleeping through it, this forms our destiny; we ourselves are this. We dream and sleep through all we do toward the molding of our own destiny. We wake in what we experience as our destiny, but only because it remains unconscious. What is it that remains in reality unconscious? That which sounds across as impulses, out of earlier incarnations on earth, and out of the life between death and a new birth in a purely spiritual way—out of the regions where also the dead are to be found—a region which we dream and sleep away. At the same time, these are forces that come also from ourselves. They are the forces with which we mold our destiny. We weave our destiny out of the same region that the dead inhabit in common with us.
Think how we grow together with this world, of which we now know something to a certain extent—how we sleep through it and how we experience it—although we have not yet spoken of the experiences in connection with the beings of the higher hierarchies. This will also be considered. But what I wish to convey in a description of this kind is that we must place the realm of the so-called dead within the same realm in which we ourselves live, and we must become conscious of the fact that we feel separated from the dead (but in reality we are not separated from them) only because we dream and sleep away our feeling-life and will-life, where the dead are. However, something else can be found in this world that we dream and sleep away, something that man as a rule does not follow at all in his usual consciousness. Sometimes he becomes aware of this when it appears before him in specially striking cases; but these are exceptional, outstanding cases, which only draw attention to what is always permeating life and streaming through it. You yourselves will have heard of many cases resembling the following one:—
Someone is in the habit of taking a daily walk; it leads him to a mountain slope. He goes there every day; it is his special pleasure. One day he goes there again as usual. Suddenly, while he is walking, he hears something like a voice, although it is not a physical voice, which tells him:—Why are you taking this walk? Can you really not do without this pleasure? It speaks more or less like this. He begins to hesitate and turns aside, in order to think over what has just happened to him. In this instant a piece of rock rolls down; it would quite certainly have struck him, had he not turned aside.
This is a true story, but one that only points out sensationally something that is always present in our lives. How often you plan to do this or that—and this or that prevents you. Think how many things would have been different, even in the smallest experiences of life, had you started out at an appointed hour, instead of half an hour later, because something detained you. Think what changes have thus come into your life; what changes have also come into the lives of many other people! It is quite easy to picture this. Let us suppose that you have planned to take a walk at 3:30 PM; you were supposed to meet another person and to tell him some news that he, in his turn, would have told to someone else. Because you came too late you do not tell him this news; this was not done, and with a certain right. Here we see a universal order of laws that differs from the one that we describe as a necessity of Nature. It consists therein, that someone is prevented from continuing his walk because he hears a voice that causes him to turn aside, and thus saves him from being struck dead by the falling piece of rock. We feel that here a different world system is at work. But this world system permeates our existence always, not merely when such sensational events take place. Even in such matters, we are used to see only the sensational aspect of things. We do not notice this other world. Why? Because we turn our gaze toward the events that occur in our life and in our surroundings and not toward the events that do not occur, events that are continually being prevented, continually being hindered.
From a certain moment in spiritual experience, that which does not happen is held back from us. That from which we are, as it were, prevented, can rise up in our consciousness in the same way as that which does happen; except that it comes to our consciousness as another world system. Try to place this world system before your souls by saying to yourselves: man is accustomed to look only at what happens and not at what has been prevented from happening. What he does not notice in this case is intimately connected with the realm in which the dead are, in which we ourselves are with our dreamlike feeling and sleeping will. Within us, we cut ourselves off from this other world because dream and sleep play also into our waking life. All that seethes, lives and weaves beneath the boundary which separates our thinking from our feeling contains, at the same time, the secrets that build not only the bridge between the so-called living and the so-called dead, but also the bridge between the realm of necessity and the realm of freedom and of so-called chance.
Zweiter Vortrag
Wie ich schon bemerkt habe, werden wir in diesen Tagen Betrachtungen anstellen, die dann morgen oder übermorgen gipfeln werden in einer Auseinandersetzung über geschichtliche Notwendigkeit und Freiheit, gipfeln werden darinnen, daß gezeigt werden soll, in welchem Sinne ein geschichtliches Ereignis notwendig ist, und in welchem Sinne ein geschichtliches Ereignis, überhaupt irgend etwas, das in das Menschenleben seelisch hereingreift, auch anders sein könnte. Es ist’ dieses ein Problem, das in der Gegenwart, wo so bedeutungsvolle Ereignisse hereingreifen in das Menschenleben, von ganz besonders tiefgehender Bedeutung ist. Denn angesichts der traurigen, katastrophalen Ereignisse der Gegenwart muß sich jeder Mensch die Frage stellen: Inwiefern sind solche Ereignisse und ist gerade dieses Ereignis abhängig von einer gewissen Notwendigkeit, und inwiefern hätte es auch ganz anders ausfallen können, hätte es sich ganz anders gestalten können?
Wie gesagt, wir werden in diesen Tagen darauf hinzielen, uns diese große, umfassende Frage zu beantworten mit den Mitteln, die man gegenwärtig in den öffentlich zu besprechenden okkulten Grundlagen haben kann. Aber wir müssen ausgehen von einer umfassenderen Betrachtung des menschlichen Lebens. Wir müssen uns etwas vertiefen von einer gewissen Seite her in die menschliche Natur selbst. Das müssen wir vorausgehen lassen. Denn, wie Sie vielleicht gerade aus den in der letzten Zeit gehaltenen öffentlichen Vorträgen entnehmen können, in das menschliche Leben spielen fortwährend die Kräfte jener Welt herein, in welcher der Mensch sich befindet zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt. Viel intensiver, als man denkt, spielen die Kräfte, in die der Mensch als sogenannter Toter eingebettet ist, in das Leben herein. Wir sind — ich habe das letzte Mal, ich möchte sagen, mehr physisch darauf aufmerksam gemacht - als Menschen so geartet, daß im Grunde genommen die Schwelle zwischen der gewöhnlichen physischen Welt und der geistigen Welt mitten durch uns geht. Wenn wir unser gewöhnliches Leben ins Auge fassen und das, was wir das letzte Mal mehr physisch betrachtet haben, heute mehr seelisch betrachten, so können wir sagen: unser menschliches Leben, wenn wir hier im physischen Leibe verkörpert sind, verläuft so, daß wir erstens alles das in uns wirksam haben, was durch unsere Sinne während unseres Lebens erfahren werden kann, alles das, was sich gewissermaßen als der Sinnesteppich um uns herum ausbreitet und wovon wir durch unsere Sinne Kunde erhalten. Auf diese Welt baut sich dann alles das auf, was wir aus dieser Sinneswelt herausarbeiten, was wir aber auch unabhängig von dieser Sinneswelt durchdringen können in unserem Vorstellungsleben. Wenn wir aber Sinnesleben und Vorstellungsleben zusammenfassen, so haben wir im Grunde schon alles dasjenige, worin wir mit unserem gewöhnlichen wachen Bewußtsein leben.
Von dem Augenblicke an, wo wir morgens aufwachen, bis zu dem Augenblicke, wo wir einschlafen, wachen wir in Wirklichkeit nur vollständig in unseren Sinneseindrücken und in unseren Vorstellungen. In unseren Gefühlen, in unserem Gefühlsleben wachen wir eigentlich nicht im vollen Sinne des Wortes. Und zwischen dem Vorstellungsleben und dem Gefühlsleben liegt für das gewöhnliche Bewußtsein ziemlich unvermerkt die Schwelle. Denn das, was unser Gefühlsleben als tiefere Realität durchdringt, das kommt eigentlich dem Menschen in Wirklichkeit gar nicht zum Bewußtsein. Die Gefühle selbst kommen ihm zum Bewußtsein. Die Gefühle wogen herauf aus einer unterbewußten Welt, aber das Bewußtsein hat mit den Gefühlen wirklich nicht mehr zu tun, als wir im Schlafe mit unseren Träumen zu tun haben. Deshalb konnte auch in den öffentlichen Vorträgen hier in der Schweiz jetzt gesagt werden: Indem der Mensch in seinem Gefühlsleben lebt, schläft er eigentlich träumend. Das Traumleben dehnt sich herein in unser Wachleben. Wir sind vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen eigentlich immer in Träumen; aber nur die am allerstärksten mit unserem physischen Dasein zusammenhängenden Träume kommen zum Bewußtsein oder zur Erinnerung. Das Träumen geht durch das ganze Schlafleben weiter, und nur in den tieferen Schichten unseres Bewußtseins schlafen wir gewissermaßen traumlos. Aber dieses träumende und traumlos schlafende Leben geht auch in unser Wachleben herein. Das Traumleben geht in unser Gefühlsleben herein, in das Affektleben. Und wir wissen von der Wirklichkeit, von dem wirklichen Inhalte im gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein, im nichthellseherischen Bewußtsein nicht mehr von unserem Gefühlsleben, als wir von dem wissen, was eigentlich geschieht, wenn die Bilder des Traumlebens vor uns ablaufen. Daher konnte auch gesagt werden, daß der Mensch den Inhalt dessen, was man «Geschichte» nennt, nicht mit wachem Bewußtsein erlebt, sondern durchträumt. Was Geschichte ist, ist ein Weltentraum des Menschen. Denn die Impulse, die in der Geschichte leben, leben eigentlich in den Gefühls-, in den Affektimpulsen; der Mensch träumt, indem er Geschichte erlebt. Also das Gefühlsleben liegt schon unterhalb der Schwelle des eigentlich wachen Bewußtseins. Auch in dieser seelischen Beziehung geht die Grenze zwischen bewußtem und unterbewußtem Leben mitten durch den Menschen.
Und im Willensleben schläft der Mensch vollständig. Denn was eigentlich im Willen lebt, davon weiß der Mensch mit dem gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein nichts. Sein gewöhnliches Bewußtsein lebt in der Realität, die sich im Willen ausspricht, genau so, wie es lebt im tiefen Schlafe. Bewußt verfolgt der Mensch eigentlich nur dasjenige, was schon aus dem Willen heraus und in die Handlung übergegangen ist; darinnen wacht er, im Vollziehen des Willens kann er nicht wachen. Daher stritten sich die Philosophen immer über die Freiheit und Unfreiheit des Willens, weil sie nicht eindringen konnten in das Gebiet das nur mit hellseherischem Bewußtsein durchschaut werden kann -, aus dem der Wille eigentlich seine Impulse holt. So liegt also, ich betone es noch einmal, auch in seelischer Beziehung für diesen Menschen die Schwelle zwischen der eigentlichen physischen wachen Welt und der dem Menschen unterbewußt bleibenden Welt mitten im Menschen drinnen.
Nun spielt in unser Leben herein, insofern es Gefühls- und Willensleben ist, also verträumt und verschlafen wird, alles dasjenige, was der Mensch miterlebt zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt. Die Erlebnisse der Toten sind eigentlich in der Welt, in der wir lebend auch sind, indem wir fühlen und wollen. Nur kennen wir mit dem gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein die Realitäten, die im Fühlen und Willen leben, nicht. Würden wir das dem Gefühlsleben zugrunde liegende Reale, würden wir namentlich das dem Willensleben zugrunde liegende Wirkliche so durchleben, wie wir das Wirkliche der Sinneswahrnehmungen und des Vorstellens — des Vorstellens schon weniger, aber doch bis zu einem gewissen Grade - wachend durchleben, dann wäre der Tote, der Mensch, der durch die Todespforte gegangen ist, genau ebenso neben uns, mit uns in fortwährender Verbindung, wie derjenige, der mit uns noch auf dem physischen Plane so herumwandelt, daß wir von ihm Eindrücke empfangen können im wachen Bewußtsein durch unsere Sinne und durch unser Vorstellungsleben. Dasjenige, was in den Impulsen der Toten lebt, das ragt fortwährend herein in unser Gefühlsleben, in das Leben unserer Willensimpulse. Und nur weil wir dies verträumen und verschlafen, fühlen wir uns von den Toten, mit denen wir verbunden waren, getrennt.
Aber im Grunde ist die Welt, in der die sogenannten Toten leben, auch recht verschieden von der Welt, in der wir leben, wenn wir im physischen Leibe verkörpert sind. Denn fragen Sie sich mit voller Besonnenheit: Was liegt denn eigentlich vor für das wache Bewußtsein, für das nicht hellseherisch gewordene Bewußtsein vom Aufwachen bis zum Einschlafen? Es liegt nur dasjenige vor, was erlebt werden kann in der Welt, die sich als Sinnenteppich ausbreitet, und in der Welt, die wir uns durch unsere Vorstellungen aus dieser Sinneswelt machen. Von dieser Welt ist zunächst alles das, was dem sogenannten mineralischen Reiche angehört, wozu man Sinnesorgane braucht, um es wahrzunehmen, für den Toten unmittelbar nicht vorhanden. Zu dieser mineralischen Welt gehören zum Beispiel auch die Sterne, gehören Sonne und Mond, gehört überhaupt alles das, was mit den Sinnen wahrgenommen wird, und es gehört ein großes Gebiet der Pflanzenwelt dazu. Das sind zunächst Gebiete, die nicht aufgeschlossen liegen vor dem Geistes- und Seelenauge des Toten.
Dagegen beginnt aufgeschlossen zu sein für das Seelenauge des Toten bereits die Welt, die auch mehr oder weniger unbewußt vor uns liegt, indem wir den Blick lenken - hier allerdings den durch die Sinneswelt verschleierten Blick - auf die tierische Welt. Die tierische Welt, das heißt die Welt der Impulse, der Kräfte, die in den Tieren leben, die ist für den Toten genauso die unterste Welt, wie für uns im physischen Leibe die mineralische Welt die unterste Welt ist. Wie sich für uns aufbaut die pflanzliche Welt, die hervorsprießt aus der mineralischen Welt, so baut sich für den Toten aus der Grundlage, die in der tierischen Welt lebt, die menschliche Welt auf, die menschliche Welt als seelische Welt. Und wie für uns das Tierreich erst die dritte Kategorie bildet, die sich aufbaut auf mineralischer, auf pflanzlicher Welt, so für den Toten als das weiter hinaufliegende Reich das Reich der Angeloi, Archangeloi und so weiter.
Die ganze Umgebung, in die der Tote hineinversetzt ist, ist damit eine andere als die Umgebung, in der wir selbst im physischen Leibe leben. Denn stellen Sie sich einmal vor: aus der Welt, die Sie wahrnehmen in Ihrem physischen Leibe, über die Sie sich Vorstellungen machen in Ihrem physischen Leibe, wäre alles dasjenige weg, was Sie durch die Sinne wahrnehmen: es bliebe überhaupt zunächst für das nichthellseherische Bewußtsein etwas übrig, was sich nur wie eine ’Traumeswelt ausnehmen könnte, was nur erträumt werden könnte, was nicht stärker im Bewußtsein leben könnte als ein Traum.
Deutlicher aber wird der Unterschied, wenn wir ihn in einer andern Weise noch ins Auge fassen. Das wesentlichste Charakteristikum unseres Lebens in der Umwelt, so lange wir im physischen Leibe verkörpert sind, ist - obwohl innerlich die Sache anders ist, das wissen Sie aus andern Vorträgen -, daß wir, indem wir zu den mineralischen und pflanzlichen Wesen in eine Beziehung treten, das Bewußtsein haben können: diesen Wesen bleibt es verhältnismäßig gleichgültig, was wir mit ihnen anstellen. Wir handeln ja auch unter dem Einflusse dieses eben ausgesprochenen Gedankens. Wir zerschlagen ruhig Steine und haben zunächst das Bewußtsein, daß wir dem Stein nicht weh tun oder auch keine Lust bereiten. Sie wissen, innerlich ist die Sache etwas anders. Aber insofern wir Menschen mit der mineralischen Umwelt in Berührung stehen, denken wir mit einem gewissen Rechte: Lust und Leid wird nicht gleich aufgerührt, wenn wir einen Stein zerschlagen oder dergleichen.
In ähnlicher Weise verhalten wir uns gegenüber der Pflanzenwelt. Und diejenigen Menschen sind schon sehr selten, welche zum Beispiel eine Art Schmerz, eine Art Mitgefühl empfinden, wenn eine Blume gepflückt wird. Die Menschen, welche in einem gewissen Sinne doch lieber die Rosen am Rosenstrauch haben als im Rosenbouquet im Zimmer, die sind nicht gar so häufig. Erst bei der tierischen Welt fangen wir an, unser Menschliches unmittelbar mit der Umwelt in Beziehung zu bringen. Und noch einmal sei es gesagt, die Menschen, die mit einem auch nur entfernt ähnlichen Gefühle Rosen vom Rosenstrauch pflücken, wie sie Köpfe von Tieren abreißen würden, um sie zu Sträußchen zusammenzufügen, dieseMenschen sind eben doch unter den Gegenwartsmenschen selten. Selbst unter Anthroposophen habe ich gefunden, daß nicht alle immer die Rosen am Rosenstrauch am allerliebsten haben, obwohl das Gefühl schon so weit fortgeschritten ist, daß noch niemals in einem Saale mir zum Beispiel ein Bouquet mit Nachtigallenköpfen überreicht worden ist! Da fangen wir an zu fühlen, wie das Leben, das sich in uns selbst ausdehnt, sich in unsere Umwelt hinein fortsetzt.
Der Tote hat es nicht so. Für den Toten gibt es gar nichts in der Umgebung, für das er nicht das Gefühl haben könnte, wenn er nur einen Finger ausstreckt - es ist jetzt ganz symbolisch, bildlich gesprochen -, durch das, was sich durch das Ausstrecken des Fingers, also durch irgendeine Aktion vollzieht, ja durch alles, was der Tote tut, löst sich Lust und Leid in der Umgebung aus. Er kommt gar nicht anders mit seiner Umwelt in Beziehung, als daß er Lust und Leid erweckt, daß überall ein Echo von Lust und Leid ist. Tun Sie etwas, nachdem Sie durch die Pforte des Todes gegangen sind, so geschieht immer durch das, was Sie tun, irgendwo Schmerz oder Freude, Entspannung oder Anspannung von so etwas, was dem Gefühlsleben ähnlich ist. Wenn wir an einen Tisch klopfen, haben wir eben das Gefühl, dem Tisch tut es nicht weh. Der Tote kann nie eine Aktion ausführen, ohne daß er weiß, er lebt und webt nicht nur in Lebendigem, sondern in gefühlsmäßig Lebendigem. Gefühlsmäßiger Reiz ist ausgebreitet über seine ganze Umgebung.
Von einer andern Seite finden Sie das ja selbst geschildert in den entsprechenden Kapiteln meiner «Theosophie». Diese gefühlsmäßige Reizwelt lebt also oben im tierischen Reich auf einer untersten Stufe. Und so bekannt wir sind mit einer gewissen Außenseite des mineralischen Reiches durch unsere Sinneswahrnehmungen, so bekannt ist der Tote mit der Innenseite — nicht mit der Außenform, aber mit der Innenseite — des tierischen Lebens über seine ganze Welt hin. Das ist die unterste Grundlage, auf der er lebt, auf der er sich aufbaut, auf der er sein Dasein aufbaut. Und ein großes Stück Arbeit für den Toten besteht darinnen, sich in unmittelbare Beziehung zu der Welt des TierischLebendigen zu setzen.
Wie wir uns hier von Kindheit auf in Beziehung setzen zu der Welt des Mineralisch-Toten, so leben wir uns nach dem Tode ein in eine allmählich immer mehr an Breite und an Ausdehnung wachsende Beziehung zu der Welt des Tierisch-Lebendigen Die lernt der Tote nach allen Seiten kennen. Die lernt der Tote kennen, indem er stufenweise alle die Geheimnisse zu durchdringen hat, welche ihm hier so verborgen sind, wie seelisch dasjenige, was unter seinem Gefühlsleben schlummert; denn es ist dasselbe.
Es kann selbstverständlich eine solche Frage wie diejenige, die ich jetzt aufwerfen will, nicht als eine ordentlich wissenschaftliche Frage gelten. Allein sie kann doch hinweisen auf irgend etwas, hinter dem reale Beziehungen sind. Gefragt werden kann, warum denn eigentlich dem Menschen hier in der physischen Welt manches verborgen ist beim Walten der alles durchdringenden Weltenweisheit. Man kann fragen, warum das verborgen ist, in das der Tote eingeweiht werden muß: in die Geheimnisse des Aufbaues der gesamten tierischen Welt.
Gerade wenn man solch eine Frage zu beantworten versucht, greift man hinein in die tiefsten Geheimnisse des Daseins überhaupt. Und auch mit dieser Frage werden wir uns noch etwas zu befassen haben in diesen Betrachtungen. Zunächst aber haben wir den Blick darauf zu lenken, wie denn dieses Erfassen der Innenseite des tierischen Lebens eigentlich ist.
Da könnte ich zunächst, um nicht theoretisch zu werden, vielleicht ausgehen von einer zeitgeschichtlichen Tatsache. Sie wissen, daß in einer gewissen äußerlichen Weise das menschliche historische Bewußtsein in der neueren Zeit eine Umänderung erfahren hat durch den Darwinismus. Man hat versucht, die Kräfte zu finden, durch die sich die Organismen von sogenannten unvollkommenen zu vollkommenen Zuständen entwickeln. Die Darwinisten haben ja mancherlei genannt: zunächst das Prinzip der zweckmäßigen Auslese, der Anpassung an die Verhältnisse und so weiter. Ich will Ihnen mit diesen Dingen, die Sie in jedem Handbuch des Darwinismus nachlesen können, sogar in jedem Lexikon, nicht kommen. Aber hinweisen will ich darauf, daß das äußerliche, abstrakte Prinzipien sind; daß für den, der tiefer blickt, gar nichts damit gesagt ist. Was eigentlich geschieht, ist nicht gezeigt, wenn man sagt: die Vervollkommnung geschieht dadurch, daß die Passendsten ausgewählt werden und die andern allmählich absterben, während die Passendsten die Überlebenden sind. Damit ist natürlich nichts gesagt über die Kräfte, über die Impulse, die eigentlich im tierischen Reiche leben, damit die Tiere erst sich vervollkommnen, aber auch in der gewöhnlichen gegenwärtigen Welt ihr Leben entsprechend zimmern können.
Was wirkt denn wirklich in den Kräften, die vom Darwinismus als Selektionskräfte, als Kräfte einer reinen mechanischen Zweckmäßigkeit und so weiter angesprochen werden? Darinnen wirken die Toten. Es gehört zu den überraschendsten, eindringlichsten Erfahrungen, die im Kreise der Toten gemacht werden können, wenn man darauf kommt, wie — ebenso wie es hier Schmiede und Tischler und andere Leute gibt, welche in der mechanischen Welt handwerksmäßig arbeiten und dadurch die physisch-sinnliche Grundlage des Lebens hier schaffen - in der geistigen Welt, vom Tierreich angefangen nach aufwärts, die Toten arbeiten. Während das tierische Reich hier in vieler Beziehung ein solches ist, das der Mensch als ein niedriges empfindet, aber das mineralische liegt noch niedriger, ist die Grundlage der Arbeit der Toten die Fortführung des tierischen Reiches. Daher lebt sich der Tote gewissermaßen ein in alle die Geschicklichkeiten, die ihm hier für das Leben zwischen der Geburt und dem Tode verborgen sind.
Hier kommen wir dann an den Punkt, der vielfach geheimgehalten wurde bis in unsere Zeit von den Brüderschaften, welche zum Teil mit Recht, zum Teil mit Unrecht glauben, daß die andern Menschen für solche Dinge nicht reif sind. Lernt man erkennen, was sich auf die tierische Natur bezieht in der Welt der Toten, hält man da Umschau, so ist das alles Gefühlsmäßig-Lebendiges. Der Mensch hat auch in seiner Seele Gefühlsmäßig-Lebendiges. Aber wie? Zwischen der Geburt und dem Tod hat er es so, daß, wäre es nicht eingeschlossen in seine Unbewußtheit, der Mensch jederzeit dieses Gefühlsmäßig-Lebendige, das zwischen Geburt und Tod liegt, zum Verderb des übrigen Gefühlsmäßig-Lebendigen in der Welt verwenden könnte. Also bedenken Sie, was das eigentlich heißt! Sie leben selbst in Ihrem persönlichen Leben ein Gefühlsmäßig-Lebendiges, das aber eingeschlossen ist in die Grenzen, die eben dem physischen Menschen gezogen sind. Hätten die Menschen im allgemeinen das frei zur Verfügung - Anthroposophen werden in dieser Beziehung schon kultivierter sein -, so könnte der Mensch jederzeit die Kräfte, die da gerade verborgen sind, verwenden, um das um ihn liegende Gefühlsmäßig-Lebendige zu zerstören. Die tierische Natur im Menschen ist zunächst sogar im vorzüglichen Sinne eine zerstörerische, und sie ist sogar angelegt, zu zerstören. Und wenn der Mensch durch die Pforte des Todes gegangen ist, so ist es vor allen Dingen seine Aufgabe, alle die Impulse aus seiner Seele herauszureißen, welche dann in der Weise frei geworden sind, daß eigentlich sehr viel vorliegt von dem Bedürfnis, Lebendiges zu zerstören, Lebendiges zu töten. Und man kann sagen, zu dem, was der Tote lernen muß, gehört vor allen Dingen Achtung, Heiligachtung vor allem Lebendigen.
Diese Heiligachtung vor allem Lebendigen ist etwas, was man beobachten kann als die selbstverständliche Entwickelung des Toten. So wie wir hier mit innigem Anteil ein Kind verfolgen, das sich von klein auf, allmählich, von Tag zu Tag, von Woche zu Woche selbstverständlich entwickelt, wie wir bei diesem Kinde verfolgen, wie das Seelische ergreift das Fleischlich-Leibliche, wie wir innige Freude haben an dem, was da geschieht, ohne daß der sogenannte freie Wille mitwirkt, was da rein durch seelisch-organische Kräfte geschieht: so hat man, wenn man den Toten von seinem Todestage an weiterhin durch sein Leben verfolgt, eben wiederum die Anschauung eines dem freien Willen zunächst entzogenen Einlebens in die Heilighaltung alles in der Umgebung befindlichen Lebendigen. Das ist gewissermaßen etwas, was wie eine Außenseite im Toten geschieht, so wie im Kinde es als Außenseite geschieht, daß es wächst, daß seine Züge ausdrucksvoller werden. Was so äußerlich am Kinde zu unserer Freude heranwächst, das wächst am Toten heran, indem wir von ihm immer mehr und mehr ausstrahlend finden das so erhebende Heilighalten alles Lebendigen.
Und in dieser Beziehung unterscheidet sich gewichtig das Leben nach dem Tode von dem Leben hier. Das Leben hier hat gerade dasjenige durch einen Schleier verdeckt, in das sich der Tote vertiefen muß. Wir nehmen die Welt durch unsere Sinne wahr und bilden uns gewisse Gesetze, die wir Naturgesetze nennen, nach denen wir dann unsere mechanischen Werkzeuge, unsere Geräte ringsherum bilden. Das, was wir nach dem Gesetze der Natur um uns herum als eine Welt aufbauen, ist im wesentlichen eine Welt des Todes. Selbst die Pflanze, selbst den Baum müssen wir töten, wenn wir sein Holz in den Dienst unserer mechanischen Künste stellen wollen. Und es gehört wiederum zu den erschütterndsten Erkenntnissen, daß im Grunde genommen alles dasjenige, was uns unsere Sinne lehren, wenn wir es anwenden durch unseren Willen, ein Zerstörendes ist und gar nicht anders sein kann als ein Zerstörendes.
Ja, selbst wenn wir Künstlerisches schaffen, müssen wir uns beteiligen an der Welt des Zerstörens. Was wir da aufbauen, geht erst aus der Zerstörung hervor. Eine gütige Weltenweisheit hat nur bewirkt, daß wir in der Regel zunächst noch als Menschen zurückscheuen, von der tierischen Natur nach aufwärts dasjenige in den Dienst der mechanischen Kunst zu stellen, was da lebt. In einem gewissen höheren Sinne lebt aber in der Welt eigentlich alles. Das können Sie aus den verschiedenen Darstellungen, die im Laufe der Jahre gegeben worden sind, schon erkennen. Was tun wir aber eigentlich, indem wir das in den Dienst der mechanischen Kunst stellen, was wir durch unsere Sinne wahrnehmen und durch unseren Verstand kombinieren? Wir tragen fortwährend den Tod in das Leben hinein. Ein Raffaelisches Gemälde selbst kann nicht zustande kommen, ohne daß der Tod in das Leben hineingetragen wird. Bevor ein Raffaelisches Gemälde entsteht, lebt mehr, als da lebt, nachdem ein Raffaelisches Gemälde entstanden ist. Die Abschlagszahlung im Universum besteht nur darin, daß Seelen kommen, die dieses Raffaelische Gemälde genießen, die von diesem Raffaelischen Gemälde einen Impuls, einen Eindruck bekommen. Der Impuls, der Eindruck, den die schaffende oder die genießende Seele bekommt, das ist dasjenige, was einzig und allein hinweghelfen kann über das Wirken des Todes - selbst in dem Fall, wenn die höchsten Güter, die sogenannten höchsten Güter der Menschheit hier auf dem physischen Plan geschaffen werden. Die Erde wird im wesentlichen dadurch zerstört werden, daß die Menschen den Tod mit ihren mechanischen Künsten in die Erde in einem so starken Maß hineintragen. Sie wird nicht mehr leben können, weil der Tod dasjenige überwiegt, was hinübergerettet werden kann über den Untergang der physischen Erde in die Jupiterwelt. Aber aus dem, was Menschen geschaffen haben, indem sie den Tod mit dem Leben verwoben haben, werden sie seelischen Inhalt wiederum erhalten haben, den sie nun hinübertragen in die Jupiterwelt.
Mehr als man sagen kann, webt sich durch menschliches Tun selber, dadurch daß dieses menschliche Tun zwischen Geburt und Tod innig verwoben ist mit dem Sinnessein, mehr als man sagen kann, webt sich fortwährend der Tod, webt sich fortwährend die Vernichtung des Lebendigen in das Leben ein. Allerdings beruht darauf, daß sich der Tod in das Leben einverwebt, die Entstehung des Bewußtseins überhaupt, und der Mensch würde gar nicht seine Erdenaufgabe in bezug auf das Bewußtsein absolvieren können, wenn er nicht dazu berufen wäre, den Tod in das Leben einzuweben. Selbst in unserem Innern töten wir in dem Augenblicke das Leben der Nerven, in welchem wir vorstellen wollen. Denn ein richtig lebender Nerv kann nicht vorstellen. In unser Nervenleben hinein ersterben wir fortwährend, habe ich in öffentlichen Vorträgen in der letzten Zeit gesagt.
In dieser Beziehung ist das Leben zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt ein völlig entgegengesetztes. Da handelt es sich darum, daß die Menschenseele vollständig sich einlebt in die Heilighaltung des Lebendigen, in die Durchdringung des Lebendigen mit immer mehr und mehr Leben. So hängt das Leben zwischen der Geburt und dem Tode zusammen mit dem Tode, und es hängt das Leben zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt zusammen mit dem Leben des Ganzen. Denn nur dadurch, daß der Mensch stirbt und von der geistigen Welt heraus seine Impulse in das Leben der Tiere sendet, lebt über die Erde hin eine tierische Welt.
Das zweite, in das sich der Mensch nach dem Tode einlebt, ist das Reich der Menschenseelen selbst, gleichgültig, ob diese Menschenseelen hier im physischen Leibe verkörpert sind, oder ob sie selbst schon durch die Pforte des Todes gegangen sind. Der tierischen Welt gegenüber hat der Mensch nach dem Tode das Gefühl, wenn er eine Aktion ausführt: etwas hat Freude, oder etwas tut weh einem Wesen oder wenigstens einem Wesenhaften. Er weiß: Stößt du nur mit deiner Geisteskraft, so stößt du an Lebendiges.
Hier ist es mehr ein allgemeines Leben und Weben im Lebendigen. Gegenüber der Bekanntschaft mit dem, was in unsere Sphäre, die menschliche Sphäre tritt, wenn wir tot sind, ist es so, daß, wenn eine andere Seele in Beziehung zu uns tritt, nachdem wir selbst durch die Pforte des Todes gegangen sind, wir dann fühlen, durch die Art, wie wir zu dieser Seele in Beziehung treten, wird unser eigenes Lebensgefühl entweder verstärkt oder abgeschwächt. Zu der einen Seele, gleichgültig ob sie hier auf Erden weilt oder drüben in den geistigen Welten, treten wir so in Beziehung, daß wir fühlen, wir werden stärker innerlich, nach einer gewissen Beziehung stärkt uns das Zusammensein mit der Seele, unsere inneren Kräfte werden stärker gemacht, wir leben gleichsam mehr auf. Wir begegnen einer Seele und fühlen, wir wachen an ihr mehr auf, als wir ohne sie aufgewacht wären. Lebensinnigkeit fließt uns in einer gewissen Stärke zu durch die Bekanntschaft mit der einen Seele. Durch die Bekanntschaft mit einer andern Seele werden wir schwächer nach einer gewissen Kraftrichtung hin; sie dämpft unser Leben gewissermaßen ab. Und darin besteht das Zusammenleben mit Seelen, daß wir unser eigenes Leben lebendig wogen fühlen in der Verbindung mit andern Seelen.
Wir leben als Menschen zwischen Geburt und Tod unser Gefühls- und Willensleben hin und wissen gar nicht, daß durch die Wogen unseres Gefühls- und Willenslebens, die wir verschlafen und verträumen, die Totenseelen leben. Sie sind immer da; sie leben in unseren eigenen Gefühls- und Willenswogen, und sie leben so, daß sie mitleben dieses Leben. Während wir mit unseren Sinnen die Umwelt gewissermaßen doch als etwas Äußerliches erleben, leben in unseren Gefühlen und in unseren Willensimpulsen die Toten intimer mit uns verbunden, als wir mit unserer Umwelt hier, insofern wir physisch verkörpert sind, innig verbunden leben.
Aber das ist so, daß dieses Leben, dieses Erleben, besser gesagt, dieses Leben-Innesein der Toten langsam und allmählich sich entwickelt, und zwar nach Maßgabe derjenigen Verhältnisse, die angesponnen sind hier im Leben. Gewiß, wir sind nach dem Tode mit allen Seelen zusammen, das ist schon wahr, aber wir wissen nichts davon. Langsam und allmählich stellen sich Beziehungen her, und zwar zu denjenigen Seelen, mit denen wir Beziehungen angeknüpft haben in dem Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod. Neue Beziehungen, ursprüngliche Beziehungen kann der Mensch zum Menschen nicht anknüpfen in dem Leben zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt, ursprünglich, unmittelbar kann er nicht anknüpfen. Wenn wir hier jemand lieb gehabt haben, oder einen gehaßt haben, also mit ihm in irgendeiner positiven oder negativen Verbindung waren, so tritt das wiederum aus einer grauen Geistestiefe im allmählichen Heraufleben des Lebens nach dem Tode auf, in der Art, wie ich es eben angedeutet habe, daß wir drinnen leben in diesen Seelen.
Und so besteht ein großer Teil dieses Erlebens, dieses Leben-Inneseins der Toten darinnen, daß allmählich auftaucht eben aus grauer Geistestiefe alles dasjenige, was an Banden da war aus dem letzten oder vorletzten oder früheren Leben, an Verhältnissen mit andern Seelen. Das kann sich weiter ausdehnen, dehnt sich für manchen Toten verhältnismäßig sehr früh, sehr bald nach dem Tode aus, doch mittelbar.
Es kann so sein, daß jemand stirbt; er hat mit einer Seele, die entweder noch auf Erden weilt, oder in der geistigen Welt weilt, in Beziehung gestanden, in irgendeiner Beziehung. Diese Beziehung tritt in ihrer Wirklichkeit nach dem Tode ihm wiederum in der angedeuteten Weise entgegen. Aber diese Seele, mit der er in Beziehung gestanden hat, hat Beziehungen zu andern Seelen, mit denen er vielleicht nicht in Beziehung gestanden hat in irgendeinem Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod. Da, indirekt, mittelbar können dann auch solche Seelen an den sogenannten Toten herantreten, mit ihm in eine Beziehung treten. Nur allerdings sind das niemals unmittelbare Beziehungen, wie ich schon sagte, sondern sie sind immer vermittelt durch diejenigen Seelen, mit denen man durch das physische Leben karmisch verbunden ist. Die Verbindung mit solchen Seelen, mit denen man die Verbindung nicht im physischen Leben begründet hat, ist doch immer eine ganz andere, und sie wird vermittelt durch die Seelen, mit denen man im physischen Leben in Beziehung gestanden hat.
Sie können sich auch jetzt leicht vorstellen, daß zunächst die unmittelbaren Beziehungen vorliegen, dann die mittelbaren Beziehungen. Dadurch aber, daß über die Erde hin doch die Seelen alle mehr oder weniger miteinander verbunden sind, der Mensch in dem langen Leben zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt wenigstens indirekt in viele Beziehungen hineingerät, lebt sich der Mensch in der Tat, wenn man die mittelbaren Beziehungen mitrechnet, in ein weites Miterleben mit andern Seelen hinein. Dieses Hineinleben in andere Seelen haben wir immer in uns, auch wenn wir hier auf der Erde stehen. Wir haben mit unzähligen Seelen immer wieder und wiederum gelebt in der geistigen Welt. Dieses Sich-Einsfühlen mit allen Seelen, das eine abstrakte Philosophie eben auch nur abstrakt behandelt und als abstraktes Einssein bespricht, das hat seine sehr konkrete Seite: es gibt eigentlich über die Erde hin kaum Seelen, mit denen nicht wenigstens eine entfernte, indirekte Verbindung doch besteht.
Diese Sache muß man so konkret fassen wie möglich, dann kommt man mit ihr zum Realen. Das, was der Tote so erlebt, ist also ein allmähliches Hineinwachen, Hineinaufwachen in eine Welt, die aber zur Grundlage sein Karma im weiteren Sinne hat. Über diese Welt hin wird es gleichsam immer mehr innerlich licht und lichter, indem wir immer Reicheres und Reicheres erleben in diesem zweiten Reiche, das sich auf dem Reich des Tierischen aufbaut, wie unser Erleben mit dem Pflanzenreich auf dem Reich des Mineralischen. Reicheres und Reicheres erlebt man immer mehr.
Dieses Erleben denken Sie sich in all den konkreten Beziehungen ausgestaltet, dann haben Sie vieles von dem, was die Seele der Toten zwischen Tod und neuer Geburt durchdringt. Denn verbunden mit diesem Erleben sind ja alle Gedanken, die uns karmisch irgendwie verbinden mit den andern Seelen. Eine unendlich reiche Welt liegt darinnen. Und es ist im wesentlichen - das können Sie schon aus dem Zyklus über das Leben zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt entnehmen - in der ersten Hälfte des Lebens zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt so, daß die Entwickelung eine mehr weisheitsvolle ist. Der Mensch lebt sich weisheitsvoll ein in die Verbindungen, die er sich allmählich wiederum herausholt aus grauer Geistestiefe; weisheitsvoll lebt er sich da hinein.
Vor dem, was ich in den Mysterien «Mitternachtsstunde des Daseins» genannt habe, sind im wesentlichen die Fäden gezogen zu all den karmischen direkten und indirekten Verbindungen hin, zu denen sie zu ziehen sind. Dann kommt das Verarbeiten. Dann tritt in das menschliche Seelenleben ein mehr dem Willen ähnliches Kraftelement ein, aber nur ein ähnliches, nicht ein gleiches. Dieses dem Willen ähnliche Kraftelement macht den Menschen immer stärker und stärker. Es verstärkt vor allen Dingen die Impulse in ihm, welche zu dem weisheitsvollen Überblicken der Welt als willensmäßige Elemente, willensmäßige Impulse, als Kraftimpülse dazukommen.
Nun tritt etwas Merkwürdiges ein. Im Menschen lebt ein gewisser Wille in der zweiten Hälfte des Lebens zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt auf. Wenn man diesen Willen beobachtet - man kann das insbesondere bei denjenigen Menschen, welche durch irgendwelche Verhältnisse ein gewissermaßen kurzes Leben zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt, ein abgekürztes Leben, haben -, da tritt eine merkwürdige Willensrichtung ein, die man etwa charakterisieren kann dadurch, daß man sagt: Es tritt der Wille ein, die Spuren des Lebens, die Spuren des Karma in einer gewissen Weise zu verwischen.
Ich bitte Sie, das recht deutlich aufzufassen. Solch ein Wille: die Spuren des Karma zu verwischen, tritt im Menschen immer mehr und mehr auf. Dieses Verwischen der Spuren des Karma, das hängt mit den tiefsten Geheimnissen des Menschenlebens zusammen. Und würde der Mensch immerfort den vollen Überblick über die Weisheit haben, den er nach seinem Tode verhältnismäßig bald haben kann, so würden unzählig viele Menschen lieber die Spuren ihres Daseins verwischen, als in neue Erdenleben eintreten. Die Verarbeitung der früheren Erdenleben im karmischen Zusammenhang, die wir ja vollziehen, kann sich im wesentlichen nur dadurch entwickeln, daß wir durch gewisse Wesen der höheren Hierarchien in der zweiten Hälfte des Lebens zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt mit Bezug auf das Weisheitslicht abgetrübt werden, abgelähmt werden, so daß wir unsere Tätigkeit, unsere Willensimpulse immer mehr und mehr einschränken. Und man kann nur sagen: das Ziel geht dann dahin, sie so einzuschränken, daß wir eben dasjenige schaffen, was sich dann in der Vererbungsströmung mit einem physischen Menschenleib verbinden und in diesem physischen Menschenleib sein Erdenschicksal ausleben kann.
Vollständig versteht man diesen Gedanken allerdings nur dann, wenn man dieses Erdenschicksal selbst ins Auge faßt. Wie ist doch dieses Erdenschicksal selbst etwas Traumhaftes für den Erdenmenschen! Er lebt sich ein als Kind in die Verhältnisse des Erdenlebens. Dasjenige, was man Schicksal nennt, tritt in Form von einzelnen Lebenserfahrungen an ihn heran. Aus dem Gewebe, das diese Lebenserfahrungen bilden, gestaltet sich etwas, was eigentlich wir selbst sind. Denn bedenken Sie alle, was Sie wären bis zu Ihrem heutigen Tage, wenn Sie nicht gerade das Schicksalsleben erlebt hätten, das Sie eben erlebt haben. Sie können schon sagen: Das, was ich als Schicksal erlebt habe, bin ich selber. — Denn ein ganz anderer wären Sie, wenn Sie eben etwas anderes als Schicksal erlebt hätten.
Und dennoch, wie fremd fühlt der Mensch eigentlich sein Schicksal, wie wenig fühlt er es mit dem verwoben, was er sein Ich nennt. In wie unzähligen Fällen fühlt sich das Ich eben getroffen vom Schicksal. Warum? Weil das, was wir selbst aus uns heraus arbeiten an der Zimmerung unseres Schicksals, eben im Unterbewußten bleibt. Das, was wir erleben, das stellt sich hinein in die Welt der Sinneserfahrung und in die Welt der Vorstellungen. Es schlägt ja nur an unser Gefühlsleben an. Unser Gefühlsleben verhält sich dazu passiv. Aber aktiv aus diesem Gefühlsleben und aus diesem Leben der Willensimpulse kraftet dasjenige heraus, was wir nun auch mit dem Reich der Toten gemeinschaftlich haben. Was da aber herauskraftet und was wir selber tun ohne unser Bewußtsein, was wir wiederum verschlafen und verträumen, das bildet unser Schicksal, das sind wir selbst. Was wir an unserem Schicksal tun, verschlafen und verträumen wir. Was wir an unserem Schicksal erleben, das leben wir allerdings wachend durch, aber eben nur, weil es unterbewußt bleibt. Was bleibt da eigentlich unterbewußt? Dasjenige, was als Impulse herüberschlägt aus den früheren Erdenverkörperungen und aus dem Leben zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt auf eine rein geistige Weise aus dem Reiche, in dem die Toten auch sind, aus dem Reiche, das wir verträumen und verschlafen. Das sind zugleich Kräfte, die auch von uns selbst kommen. Es sind die Kräfte, mit denen wir unser Schicksal zimmern. Wir weben unser Schicksal aus demselben Reiche heraus, das mit uns gemeinschaftlich die Toten beleben.
Denken Sie sich, wie wir da zusammenwachsen mit dem Reiche, von dem wir bis zu einem gewissen Grade jetzt wissen, wie es verschlafen wird: Wie wir es erleben! - obwohl wir noch nicht haben besprechen können, wie nun das Erleben gegenüber den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien ist; das wird auch noch dazukommen. Aber was man hervorrufen möchte durch eine solche Auseinandersetzung, wie ich sie eben gegeben habe, das ist, daß wir das Reich der sogenannten Toten hereinrücken in das Reich, in dem wir selber leben. Und bewußt werden wir uns, wie wir uns nur durch den Umstand von den Toten getrennt fühlen — aber nicht von ihnen getrennt sind -, daß wir unser Gefühlsleben, in dem die Toten auch sind, und unser Willensleben, in dem die Toten auch sind, verträumen und verschlafen.
In dieser Welt, die wir verträumen und verschlafen, liegt aber noch etwas anderes, etwas, was der Mensch im gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein im Grunde gar nicht verfolgt. Er wird manchmal darauf aufmerksam, wenn es ihm in besonders eklatanten Fällen entgegentritt; aber das sind sensationelle einzelne Fälle, die nur auf dasjenige hinweisen, was das Leben fortwährend durchdringt und durchzieht. Wieviel werden Sie selbst von solchen Fällen gehört haben, wie der folgende ist!
Ein Mensch ist gewöhnt, täglich einen Spaziergang zu machen; er führt ihn auf einen Berghang. Da geht er täglich hin, das ist seine Lust. Eines Tages geht er wiederum hin. Plötzlich, während er geht, hört er etwas wie eine Stimme, die aber nicht physisch da ist, die ihm sagt: Warum gehst du eigentlich diesen Weg? Kannst du diese Lust nicht auch entbehren? — So ungefähr sagt sie zu ihm. Da wird er stutzig. Er tritt etwas zur Seite und denkt nach über das, was ihm geschehen ist. In dem Augenblicke rollt ein Felsstück in die Tiefe, das ihn ganz sicher erschlagen hätte, wenn er nicht beiseite getreten wäre.
Das ist eine wahre Geschichte, aber eine von denjenigen Geschichten, die eben nur sensationell, möchte ich sagen, auf etwas hinweisen, was fortwährend in unserem Leben da ist. Wie oft kommt es vor, daß Sie sich vornehmen, dies oder jenes zu tun. Sie werden durch dies oder jenes abgehalten. Malen Sie sich einmal aus, wie vieles manchmal anders geworden wäre im kleinen Erleben des Tages, wenn Sie einen Ausgang zu einer festgesetzten Stunde unternommen hätten, den Sie dann eine halbe Stunde später unternommen haben, weil Sie durch irgend etwas abgehalten worden sind, malen Sie sich aus, was da als Veränderung in Ihr Leben hineingekommen ist, was sogar als Veränderung in das Leben vieler anderer Menschen hineingekommen ist! Leicht kann man sich so etwas ausmalen. Nehmen wir einmal an: Sie haben sich vorgenommen, an einem Tage um viertel Vier Uhr nachmittags einen gewissen Gang zu machen, da wären Sie mit einem andern Menschen zusammengetroffen; dem hätten Sie eine Mitteilung gemacht, der wiederum diese Mitteilung einem andern gemacht hätte. Sie machen, weil Sie zu spät kommen, diese Mitteilung dem andern Menschen nicht und sehen: es wird hintangehalten, gewisse recht wichtige Dinge geschehen nicht.
Da sieht man eine Weltenordnung, die anderer Art ist als die Weltenordnung, die wir als natürliche Notwendigkeit bezeichnen. Darin, daß jemand von dem Weiterschreiten auf einem Spazierwege abgehalten wird, weil er eine Stimme hört, durch die er beiseite tritt, was verhindert, daß er von einem Felsblock erschlagen wird, darin fühlen wir eine andere Weltenordnung hereinragen. Aber diese andere Weltenordnung ragt ja in jedem Augenblick unseres Daseins herein, nur nicht durch so sensationelle Ereignisse. Der Mensch ist nur gewöhnt, den Blick aufs Sensationelle zu richten auch in diesen Dingen. Wir beachten jene Welt nur nicht. Warum? Weil wir den Blick richten auf das, was geschieht in unserem Leben und in unserer Umwelt, und nicht richten den Blick auf dasjenige, was nicht geschieht, was immerfort abgehalten wird, was immerfort zurückgehalten wird.
Von einem gewissen Momente des geistigen Erlebens an kann dasjenige, was nicht geschieht, wovor wir gewissermaßen bewahrt oder zurückgehalten worden sind, uns ebenso zum Bewußtsein kommen wie dasjenige, was geschehen ist. Nur kommt es uns zum Bewußtsein als eine andere Weltenordnung. Versuchen Sie, jene Weltenordnung sich einmal recht zur Seele zu bringen, indem Sie sich sagen: Der Mensch ist gewöhnt, nur auf dasjenige zu sehen, was geschieht, und nicht auf dasjenige, was vom Geschehen abgehalten wurde. - Was er da nicht beachtet, das hängt innig zusammen mit dem Reiche, in dem die Toten sind, in dem wir selbst sind mit unserem träumenden Fühlen, mit unserem schlafenden Willen. Wir trennen uns in uns selber von einer ganz andern Welt dadurch ab, daß auch in das wache Leben der Traum, der Schlaf hereinspielen. Und was da alles brodelt und lebt und webt unter der Grenze, die unser Vorstellen von unserem Fühlen trennt, das ist zugleich dasjenige, was einschließt die Geheimnisse, welche die Brückebilden zwischen den sogenannten Lebendigen und den sogenannten Toten, aber auch die Brücke bilden zwischen dem Reich der Notwendigkeit und dem Reich der Freiheit und dem sogenannten Zufall.
Second Lecture
As I have already mentioned, we will be engaging in reflections over the next few days, which will culminate tomorrow or the day after tomorrow in a discussion about historical necessity and freedom, culminating in an attempt to show in what sense a historical event is necessary, and in what sense a historical event, or anything else that affects the soul in human life, could also be different. This is a problem that is of particularly profound significance in the present, when such momentous events are affecting human life. For in view of the sad, catastrophic events of the present, every human being must ask themselves: To what extent are such events, and this event in particular, dependent on a certain necessity, and to what extent could they have turned out quite differently, could they have taken a completely different course?
As I said, we will aim in these days to answer this great, comprehensive question with the means currently available in the publicly discussed occult foundations. But we must start from a more comprehensive view of human life. We must delve a little deeper into human nature itself from a certain angle. We must do this first. For, as you may have gathered from the public lectures given recently, the forces of that world in which human beings find themselves between death and a new birth are constantly at work in human life. The forces in which human beings are embedded as so-called dead beings play a much more intense role in life than one might think. We are — I pointed this out last time, I would say more physically — as human beings, such that the threshold between the ordinary physical world and the spiritual world runs right through us. If we consider our ordinary life and look at what we considered more physically last time from a more spiritual perspective today, we can say that our human life, when we are embodied here in the physical body, proceeds in such a way that, first of all, we have within us everything that can be experienced through our senses during our life, everything that spreads out around us, as it were, like a sensory carpet, and of which we receive knowledge through our senses. Everything that we work out of this sensory world is then built upon this world, but we can also penetrate this sensory world independently in our life of imagination. However, when we combine sensory life and imaginative life, we basically already have everything in which we live with our ordinary waking consciousness.
From the moment we wake up in the morning until the moment we fall asleep, we are in reality only fully awake in our sensory impressions and in our ideas. In our feelings, in our emotional life, we are not actually awake in the full sense of the word. And between the life of ideas and the life of feelings lies a threshold that is quite unnoticed by ordinary consciousness. For what permeates our emotional life as a deeper reality does not actually come to human consciousness at all. It is the feelings themselves that come to consciousness. The feelings surge up from a subconscious world, but consciousness has no more to do with the feelings than we have to do with our dreams when we are asleep. That is why it could now be said in public lectures here in Switzerland: in living his emotional life, man is actually dreaming. Dream life extends into our waking life. From the moment we fall asleep until we wake up, we are actually always dreaming; but only the dreams most closely connected with our physical existence come to consciousness or are remembered. Dreaming continues throughout our entire sleep life, and only in the deeper layers of our consciousness do we sleep without dreams, so to speak. But this dreaming and dreamless sleeping life also enters our waking life. Dream life enters into our emotional life, into our affective life. And we know no more about reality, about the real content of ordinary consciousness, of non-clairvoyant consciousness, from our emotional life than we know about what actually happens when the images of dream life pass before us. Therefore, it could also be said that human beings do not experience the content of what we call “history” with waking consciousness, but rather dream it through. What history is, is a world dream of human beings. For the impulses that live in history actually live in the emotional, in the affective impulses; human beings dream when they experience history. Thus, emotional life already lies below the threshold of actual waking consciousness. In this spiritual relationship, too, the boundary between conscious and subconscious life runs right through the human being.
And in the life of the will, human beings sleep completely. For what actually lives in the will, human beings know nothing of with their ordinary consciousness. Their ordinary consciousness lives in the reality that expresses itself in the will, just as it lives in deep sleep. Consciously, human beings actually pursue only that which has already passed from the will into action; therein they are awake, but in the execution of the will they cannot be awake. This is why philosophers have always argued about the freedom and bondage of the will, because they could not penetrate the realm that can only be seen with clairvoyant consciousness—the realm from which the will actually draws its impulses. So, I emphasize once again, in the spiritual realm as well, the threshold between the actual physical waking world and the world that remains subconscious to humans lies within the human being.
Now, insofar as our life is a life of feeling and will, that is, dreamy and sleepy, everything that human beings experience between death and a new birth plays into our lives. The experiences of the dead are actually in the world in which we also live, in that we feel and will. But with our ordinary consciousness we do not know the realities that live in feeling and will. If we were to live through the reality underlying the life of feeling, if we were to live through the reality underlying the life of will in the same way as we live through the reality of sense perception and imagination — imagination to a lesser extent, but still to a certain degree—then the dead person, the human being who has passed through the gate of death, would be just as much beside us, in constant connection with us, as the one who still walks around with us on the physical plane, so that we can receive impressions of him in our waking consciousness through our senses and through our life of imagination. That which lives in the impulses of the dead continually protrudes into our emotional life, into the life of our will impulses. And it is only because we dream this away and sleep through it that we feel separated from the dead with whom we were connected.
But basically, the world in which the so-called dead live is also quite different from the world in which we live when we are embodied in the physical body. For ask yourself with complete calmness: What actually lies before the waking consciousness, the consciousness that has not become clairvoyant, from the moment of waking up to the moment of falling asleep? There is only that which can be experienced in the world that spreads out as a tapestry of senses, and in the world that we create for ourselves through our ideas from this sensory world. From this world, everything that belongs to the so-called mineral kingdom, which requires sensory organs to perceive, is initially not immediately available to the dead. This mineral world also includes, for example, the stars, the sun and the moon, and everything that can be perceived with the senses, including a large part of the plant world. These are initially areas that are not open to the mind's eye and soul's eye of the dead.
In contrast, the world that lies more or less unconsciously before us begins to open up to the soul's eye of the dead when we direct our gaze—here, however, a gaze veiled by the sensory world—toward the animal world. The animal world, that is, the world of impulses, of the forces that live in animals, is just as much the lowest world for the dead as the mineral world is the lowest world for us in our physical bodies. Just as the plant world springs forth from the mineral world for us, so the human world, the soul world, springs forth for the dead from the foundation that lives in the animal world. And just as the animal kingdom is only the third category for us, built up on the mineral and plant worlds, so for the dead, the realm of the angeloi, archangeloi, and so on is the realm that lies further above.
The entire environment into which the dead are transported is therefore different from the environment in which we ourselves live in our physical bodies. For imagine for a moment that everything you perceive through your senses were removed from the world you perceive in your physical body, the world you form ideas about in your physical body: at first, all that would remain for the non-clairvoyant consciousness would be something that could only appear like a 'dream world,' something that could only be dreamed, something that could not live in consciousness any more strongly than a dream.
The difference becomes clearer, however, when we consider it in another way. The most essential characteristic of our life in the environment, as long as we are embodied in the physical body, is—although inwardly things are different, as you know from other lectures—that, by entering into a relationship with mineral and plant beings, we can have consciousness: these beings remain relatively indifferent to what we do with them. We also act under the influence of this very thought. We calmly break stones and are initially aware that we are not hurting the stone or giving it any pleasure. You know that inwardly the matter is somewhat different. But insofar as we humans are in contact with the mineral environment, we think with a certain degree of justification that pleasure and pain are not equally stirred up when we break a stone or do something similar.
We behave in a similar way toward the plant world. And those people who feel a kind of pain, a kind of compassion, when a flower is picked, for example, are very rare. People who, in a certain sense, prefer roses on the rose bush to roses in a bouquet in their room are not that common. It is only in relation to the animal world that we begin to relate our humanity directly to the environment. And let me say once again that people who pick roses from a rose bush with even remotely similar feelings to those with which they would tear off the heads of animals to make bouquets are rare among contemporary humans. Even among anthroposophists, I have found that not everyone always loves roses on the rose bush, although the feeling is so advanced that I have never been presented with a bouquet of nightingale heads in a hall, for example! This is where we begin to feel how the life that expands within us continues into our environment.
The dead do not have this. For the dead, there is nothing in their surroundings that they could not feel if they only stretched out a finger—this is now entirely symbolic, figuratively speaking—through what is accomplished by stretching out the finger, that is, through any action, indeed through everything the dead do, pleasure and pain are triggered in their surroundings. They have no other way of relating to their environment than by arousing pleasure and pain, so that there is an echo of pleasure and pain everywhere. If you do something after you have passed through the gates of death, what you do always causes pain or joy, relaxation or tension, something similar to emotional life, somewhere. When we knock on a table, we have the feeling that it does not hurt the table. The dead can never perform an action without knowing that they live and weave not only in living beings, but in emotionally living beings. Emotional stimuli are spread throughout their entire environment.
You will find this described from another perspective in the relevant chapters of my book “Theosophy.” This emotional world of stimuli therefore lives at the lowest level of the animal kingdom. And just as we are familiar with a certain outer aspect of the mineral kingdom through our sensory perceptions, so the dead are familiar with the inner aspect — not the outer form, but the inner aspect — of animal life throughout their entire world. This is the lowest foundation on which he lives, on which he builds himself, on which he builds his existence. And a great part of the work for the dead consists in placing themselves in direct relation to the world of animal life.
Just as we relate to the mineral world from childhood, so after death we gradually enter into a relationship with the animal world that grows ever broader and more expansive. The dead person gets to know this world in all its aspects. The dead person gets to know this by gradually penetrating all the secrets that are so hidden from him here, such as the soul life that slumbers beneath his emotional life; for it is the same thing.
Of course, a question such as the one I am about to raise cannot be considered a proper scientific question. But it can point to something behind which there are real relationships. One may ask why, in the physical world, many things are hidden from human beings, despite the omnipresent wisdom of the universe. One may ask why the dead must be initiated into the secrets of the structure of the entire animal world.
It is precisely when one attempts to answer such a question that one delves into the deepest mysteries of existence itself. And we will have to deal with this question again in these reflections. But first, we must turn our attention to how this understanding of the inner side of animal life actually comes about.
In order not to become too theoretical, I could perhaps start with a historical fact. You know that, in a certain external way, human historical consciousness has undergone a change in modern times as a result of Darwinism. Attempts have been made to find the forces through which organisms develop from so-called imperfect to perfect states. Darwinists have mentioned various things: first of all, the principle of natural selection, adaptation to circumstances, and so on. I don't want to bore you with these things, which you can read about in any Darwinist handbook or even in any encyclopedia. But I would like to point out that these are external, abstract principles; that for those who look deeper, they say nothing at all. What actually happens is not shown when one says: perfection comes about through the selection of the fittest and the gradual extinction of the others, while the fittest are the survivors. This, of course, says nothing about the forces, the impulses that actually exist in the animal kingdom, enabling animals to perfect themselves in the first place, but also to shape their lives accordingly in the ordinary present world.
What really is at work in the forces that Darwinism refers to as forces of selection, as forces of pure mechanical expediency, and so on? It is the dead who are at work there. It is one of the most surprising and powerful experiences that can be had in the realm of the dead when one realizes how—just as there are blacksmiths, carpenters, and other people here who work with their hands in the mechanical world and thereby create the physical and sensory basis of life here—so too do the dead work in the spiritual world, starting with the animal kingdom and moving upward. While the animal kingdom here is in many respects one that humans perceive as inferior, and the mineral kingdom is even lower, the basis of the work of the dead is the continuation of the animal kingdom. Therefore, the dead live, as it were, into all the skills that are hidden from them here for life between birth and death.
Here we come to the point that has been kept secret until our time by the brotherhoods, which believe, partly rightly and partly wrongly, that other people are not ready for such things. If one learns to recognize what relates to animal nature in the world of the dead, if one looks around, one finds that everything is emotionally alive. Human beings also have something emotional and living in their souls. But how? Between birth and death, if it were not enclosed in their unconsciousness, human beings could at any time use this emotional and living element that lies between birth and death to destroy the rest of the emotional and living element in the world. So consider what that actually means! You yourselves live in your personal lives with something emotional and alive, but it is enclosed within the limits that are imposed on physical human beings. If human beings in general had free access to this — anthroposophists will already be more cultivated in this respect — then human beings could at any time use the forces that are hidden there to destroy the emotional life that surrounds them. The animal nature in humans is initially destructive in the highest sense, and it is even designed to destroy. And when humans have passed through the gate of death, their task is above all to tear out of their souls all the impulses that have then become free in such a way that there is actually a great deal of the need to destroy living things, to kill living things. And one can say that what the dead must learn above all is respect, reverence for all living things.
This reverence for all living things is something that can be observed as the natural development of the dead. Just as we here follow with deep interest a child who, from an early age, gradually, day by day, week by week, develops in a natural way, just as we follow in this child how the soul takes hold of the physical body, how we take deep pleasure in what is happening, without the so-called free will playing any part, what is happening purely through soul-organic forces: so, when we continue to follow the dead from the day of their death through their life, we again have the view of a life that is initially deprived of free will and is sanctified by everything living in its surroundings. This is, in a sense, something that happens as an external aspect in the dead, just as it happens as an external aspect in the child, who grows and whose features become more expressive. What grows externally in the child to our delight grows in the dead as we find more and more of the uplifting sanctification of all living things radiating from them.
And in this respect, life after death differs significantly from life here. Life here is veiled by precisely that which the dead must immerse themselves in. We perceive the world through our senses and form certain laws, which we call natural laws, according to which we then form our mechanical tools, our devices around us. What we build around us as a world according to the laws of nature is essentially a world of death. Even the plant, even the tree, we must kill if we want to use its wood in the service of our mechanical arts. And it is one of the most shocking realizations that, when we apply what our senses teach us through our will, everything is destructive and cannot be anything other than destructive.
Even when we create art, we must participate in the world of destruction. What we build there only emerges from destruction. A benevolent worldly wisdom has only resulted in us, as humans, generally shying away from putting what lives in the animal realm at the service of mechanical art. In a certain higher sense, however, everything in the world actually lives. You can already see this from the various representations that have been given over the years. But what are we actually doing when we put what we perceive through our senses and combine through our intellect at the service of mechanical art? We are constantly carrying death into life. A Raphael painting itself cannot come into being without death being carried into life. Before a Raphaelesque painting comes into being, there is more life than there is after a Raphaelesque painting has come into being. The down payment in the universe consists only in the fact that souls come who enjoy this Raphaelesque painting, who receive an impulse, an impression from this Raphaelesque painting. The impulse, the impression that the creative or enjoying soul receives is the only thing that can help overcome the effects of death—even in the case when the highest goods, the so-called highest goods of humanity, are created here on the physical plane. The earth will essentially be destroyed by the fact that human beings are bringing death into the earth to such a great extent with their mechanical arts. It will no longer be able to live because death will outweigh what can be saved from the destruction of the physical earth in the Jupiter world. But from what humans have created by interweaving death with life, they will in turn have received soul content, which they will now carry over into the Jupiter world.
More than can be said, death weaves itself through human activity, because this human activity between birth and death is intimately interwoven with the sense life; more than can be said, death weaves itself continuously, the destruction of the living weaves itself continuously into life. However, the emergence of consciousness itself is based on the fact that death is woven into life, and human beings would not be able to fulfill their earthly task in relation to consciousness if they were not called upon to weave death into life. Even within ourselves, we kill the life of the nerves at the moment we want to imagine something. For a nerve that is truly alive cannot imagine. In our nerve life, we are constantly dying, as I have said in recent public lectures.
In this respect, the life between death and a new birth is completely opposite. It is a matter of the human soul becoming completely attuned to the sanctity of the living, to the permeation of the living with more and more life. Thus, life between birth and death is connected with death, and life between death and a new birth is connected with the life of the whole. For it is only through the fact that human beings die and send their impulses into the life of animals from the spiritual world that an animal world lives on earth.
The second realm into which human beings enter after death is the realm of human souls themselves, regardless of whether these human souls are embodied here in physical bodies or whether they themselves have already passed through the gate of death. In contrast to the animal world, after death, humans have the feeling that when they perform an action, something gives pleasure or causes pain to a being or at least to something that is essentially a being. They know that if they strike with their spiritual power alone, they strike something that is alive.
Here it is more a general life and weaving within the living. In contrast to our acquaintance with what enters our sphere, the human sphere, when we are dead, it is such that when another soul enters into relationship with us after we ourselves have passed through the gate of death, we then feel that, through the way we relate to this soul, our own sense of life is either strengthened or weakened. We enter into a relationship with one soul, regardless of whether it dwells here on earth or over there in the spiritual worlds, in such a way that we feel we become stronger inwardly; after a certain relationship, being together with the soul strengthens us, our inner powers are made stronger, we live more fully, as it were. We encounter a soul and feel that we awaken more through it than we would have awakened without it. A certain strength of meaning flows into us through our acquaintance with one soul. Through our acquaintance with another soul, we become weaker in a certain direction of force; it dampens our life, so to speak. And this is what living together with souls consists of: that we feel our own life pulsating in connection with other souls.
As human beings, we live our emotional and volitional lives between birth and death, completely unaware that the waves of our emotional and volitional life, which we sleep and dream away, are the lives of the dead souls. They are always there; they live in our own emotional and volitional waves, and they live in such a way that they share this life with us. While we experience our environment with our senses as something external, the dead live more intimately connected with us in our feelings and impulses than we live intimately connected with our environment here, insofar as we are physically embodied.
But it is so that this life, this experience, or rather, this inner life of the dead develops slowly and gradually, according to the conditions that have been established here in life. Certainly, after death we are together with all souls, that is true, but we know nothing about it. Slowly and gradually, relationships are established, namely with those souls with whom we have established relationships in the life between birth and death. Human beings cannot establish new relationships, original relationships, with other human beings in the life between death and a new birth; they cannot establish them originally, immediately. If we loved someone here, or hated someone, that is, if we had a positive or negative connection with them, this reappears from a gray spiritual depth in the gradual awakening of life after death, in the way I have just indicated, that we live within these souls.
And so a large part of this experience, this inner life of the dead, consists in the gradual emergence from the gray depths of the spirit of everything that was there in the last or penultimate or earlier lives, in relationships with other souls. This can expand further, expanding for some dead people relatively early, very soon after death, but indirectly.
It may be that someone dies who has been connected in some way with a soul that is either still on earth or in the spiritual world. This relationship reappears in reality after death in the manner indicated. But this soul with whom he was connected has connections with other souls with whom he may not have been connected in any life between birth and death. Indirectly, then, such souls can also approach the so-called dead and enter into a relationship with them. However, as I have already said, these are never direct relationships, but are always mediated by those souls with whom one is karmically connected through physical life. The connection with such souls, with whom one has not established a connection in physical life, is always quite different, and it is mediated by the souls with whom one has been related in physical life.
You can easily imagine that first there are the direct relationships, then the indirect relationships. However, because all souls are more or less connected with each other through the earth, and because human beings enter into many relationships, at least indirectly, during the long life between death and a new birth, human beings actually live, if one includes the indirect relationships, in a wide co-experience with other souls. We always have this living into other souls within us, even when we are here on earth. We have lived again and again with countless souls in the spiritual world. This empathy with all souls, which abstract philosophy treats only abstractly and discusses as abstract oneness, has a very concrete side: there are hardly any souls on earth with whom we do not have at least a distant, indirect connection.
This matter must be grasped as concretely as possible, then one can come to understand it in reality. What the dead experience is thus a gradual awakening into a world that has its foundation in karma in the broader sense. Above this world, it becomes, as it were, increasingly lighter and brighter within us as we experience ever richer and richer things in this second realm, which is built upon the animal realm, just as our experience of the plant realm is built upon the mineral realm. We experience ever richer and richer things.
Imagine this experience unfolding in all its concrete relationships, and you will have much of what permeates the soul of the dead between death and new birth. For connected with this experience are all the thoughts that somehow connect us karmically with other souls. An infinitely rich world lies within. And it is essentially—as you can already gather from the cycle on life between death and a new birth—that in the first half of life between death and a new birth, development is more wisdom-filled. Human beings live wisely into the connections that they gradually draw out of the gray depths of the spirit; they live wisely into them.
Before what I have called in the mysteries the “midnight hour of existence,” the threads are essentially drawn to all the direct and indirect karmic connections to which they are to be drawn. Then comes the processing. Then an element of power more similar to the will enters the human soul life, but only similar, not the same. This element of force, similar to the will, makes the human being stronger and stronger. Above all, it strengthens the impulses within him that contribute to a wise overview of the world as elements of the will, impulses of the will, as impulses of force.
Now something strange happens. In the second half of life, between death and a new birth, a certain will arises in the human being. If one observes this will—one can do so especially in people who, due to certain circumstances, have a relatively short life between death and a new birth, an abbreviated life—a remarkable direction of the will emerges, which can be characterized by saying that the will arises to erase the traces of life, the traces of karma, in a certain way.
I ask you to understand this very clearly. Such a will: to erase the traces of karma, arises more and more in human beings. This erasing of the traces of karma is connected with the deepest mysteries of human life. And if human beings always had the full overview of wisdom that they can have relatively soon after death, countless people would prefer to erase the traces of their existence rather than enter into new earthly lives. The processing of previous earthly lives in the karmic context, which we are indeed carrying out, can essentially only develop through our being tempered and tempered by certain beings of the higher hierarchies in the second half of life between death and a new birth, with reference to the light of wisdom, so that we increasingly restrict our activity and our impulses of will. And one can only say that the goal is to restrict them in such a way that we create precisely what can then connect with a physical human body in the stream of heredity and live out its earthly destiny in this physical human body.
However, this idea can only be fully understood if one considers this earthly destiny itself. How dreamlike this earthly destiny is for human beings on earth! As a child, they live themselves into the conditions of earthly life. What we call destiny approaches them in the form of individual life experiences. From the fabric that these life experiences form, something is created that is actually ourselves. For consider what you would be today if you had not experienced the life of destiny that you have experienced. You can already say: What I have experienced as destiny is myself. — For you would be someone completely different if you had experienced something other than destiny.
And yet, how foreign does a person's fate actually feel to them, how little do they feel it is interwoven with what they call their self. In countless cases, the self feels struck by fate. Why? Because what we ourselves work out from within ourselves in shaping our fate remains in the subconscious. What we experience enters the world of sensory experience and the world of ideas. It only affects our emotional life. Our emotional life is passive in this regard. But actively emerging from this emotional life and from this life of volitional impulses is what we now also share with the realm of the dead. But what emerges from this and what we ourselves do without our consciousness, what we in turn sleep through and dream away, forms our destiny; that is what we ourselves are. What we do to our destiny, we sleep through and dream away. What we experience in our destiny, however, we live through while awake, but only because it remains in the subconscious. What actually remains subconscious? That which carries over as impulses from previous earthly incarnations and from the life between death and a new birth in a purely spiritual way from the realm where the dead also are, from the realm that we dream away and sleep through. These are at the same time forces that also come from ourselves. They are the forces with which we shape our destiny. We weave our destiny out of the same realm that, together with us, animates the dead.
Think how we grow together with the realm of which we now know, to a certain extent, how it is overslept: how we experience it! Although we have not yet been able to discuss what the experience is like in relation to the beings of the higher hierarchies; that will come later. But what I would like to bring about through such a discussion as I have just given is that we bring the realm of the so-called dead into the realm in which we ourselves live. And we become aware of how we feel separated from the dead only by circumstance — but are not separated from them — that we dream away and sleep through our emotional life, in which the dead also exist, and our will life, in which the dead also exist.
In this world that we dream away and sleep through, however, there is something else, something that human beings in their ordinary consciousness do not really pursue. They sometimes become aware of it when it confronts them in particularly striking cases; but these are sensational individual cases that only point to what permeates and pervades life continuously. How many such cases as the following have you heard of yourself?
A man is accustomed to taking a walk every day; he walks on a mountainside. He goes there every day, it is his pleasure. One day he goes there again. Suddenly, as he is walking, he hears something like a voice, but it is not physically there, saying to him: Why are you walking this way? Can't you do without this pleasure? — That is roughly what it says to him. This makes him pause. He steps aside and thinks about what has happened to him. At that moment, a piece of rock rolls down the slope, which would certainly have killed him if he had not stepped aside.
This is a true story, but one of those stories that are, I would say, sensational, pointing to something that is constantly present in our lives. How often do you decide to do this or that? You are prevented from doing so by this or that. Imagine how much would sometimes have been different in the small experiences of the day if you had left at a fixed time, but then left half an hour later because you were prevented from doing so by something. Imagine what changes this would have brought about in your life, and even in the lives of many other people! It's easy to imagine something like that. Let's suppose you decided to go somewhere at a quarter past four in the afternoon, and you met someone else there; you gave them a message, and they in turn gave that message to someone else. Because you are late, you do not pass on this message to the other person and you see that things are being delayed and certain important things are not happening.
Here we see a world order that is different from the world order we call natural necessity. In the fact that someone is prevented from continuing on a path because they hear a voice that makes them step aside, preventing them from being struck by a rock, we sense the intrusion of a different world order. But this other world order intrudes into every moment of our existence, only not through such sensational events. People are simply accustomed to focusing their attention on the sensational, even in these matters. We simply do not pay attention to that world. Why? Because we focus our attention on what happens in our lives and in our environment, and do not focus our attention on what does not happen, on what is constantly prevented, on what is constantly held back.
From a certain moment of spiritual experience onwards, what does not happen, what we have been protected or held back from, can become just as conscious to us as what has happened. Only it comes to our consciousness as a different world order. Try to bring this world order to your soul by saying to yourself: Man is accustomed to seeing only what happens and not what has been prevented from happening. What he does not notice is intimately connected with the realm in which the dead are, in which we ourselves are with our dreaming feelings, with our sleeping will. We separate ourselves from a completely different world by allowing dreams and sleep to play a part in our waking life. And everything that bubbles and lives and weaves beneath the boundary that separates our imagination from our feelings is at the same time that which contains the secrets that form the bridges between the so-called living and the so-called dead, but also the bridges between the realm of necessity and the realm of freedom and so-called chance.