The Rudolf Steiner Archive

Theosophy is a mediator of peace, and its second principle, to find the seeds of truth in all worldviews, should not only apply to the past, but especially to the present.

Haeckel's “Welträtsel” (World Riddle) now wants to deal with the great question of existence. The sensation caused by this book shows the interest in this question. But the book is entirely rooted in materialism. If theosophy wants to be life, it has to deal with such facts.

What is the position of the author in modern intellectual life? A bold spirit has shown itself in this work. Ernst Haeckel has had a great influence on modern intellectual life for a decade. He was one of the first to take up Darwinism, boldly and courageously to its ultimate consequences.

Let us first deal with Haeckelianism and Darwinism. Everything that comes from Haeckel has been worked through and is acquired. But how are the conclusions to be drawn from his scientific views? Man is trapped between birth and death, is only a higher animal. After his death, there is no existence. Scientific materialism is a way of thinking from the last century, but not a consequence of Darwinism. Haeckel saw in Goethe his predecessor. Goethe discovered the intermaxillary bone that he had inferred and sought in humans. For him, this was proof of the truth of the relationship between humans and higher animals. Even as a privy councillor in Jena, he was still in the midst of students for this purpose.

Haeckel saw his materialism in his Darwinism. Haeckel's view has been very much shaken in the last decade. Haeckel established the ape relationship. Now he concludes: one must have descended from the other. For example, let's assume two brothers. One is a tramp, the other a moral person. They both have the same ancestors. One descends, the other ascends. Once there was only one nature with the possibility of development in both directions. That was Haeckel's hasty conclusion.

There is nothing more useful today than studying the secret writing of nature. Disregarding individual one-sidedness, the first 30 pages of Haeckel's book are of importance.

Riddle questions:

1. What provided the impetus for matter and force?
2. How did motion come about?
3. Where did life come from?
4. Where did the idea of fitness come from?
5. How could consciousness arise?
6. How did language come about? (Laws must underlie it).

Theosophy makes it clear to us in a different way. Let us look at sleep with her. What lies within a person during sleep? Life is present, but there is no ability to perceive. The soul has two directions, one towards the lower, one towards the higher, the Devachanic. Now the soul in us is still a baby, but it will develop and become more and more richly structured and grow up into the divine. Occultism promotes this development. There the higher world is experienced. That which lives as spirit shines in the darkness of night.

What Haeckel lacks is that he only pursues the idea of development in the past, instead of also pursuing it in the future. In this way, Theosophy will make Haeckel's thoughts fruitful.

We should learn from him, but not criticize him. Force and matter are nothing but crystallized spirit; figuratively speaking, they are like ice to water. Matter is nothing real, it is only spirit in another form. Take coal. What is it? Stone - and was a growing Farrenbaum millions of years ago. The living has become the lifeless. All of the earth's crust originated from the living.

The origin of all things lies in the All-consciousness. The question should not be: how did spirit arise from movement, but rather the other way around: how did movement arise from spirit? The religion of the materialists is nothing more than fetishism. The atom is a fetish. The worst superstition is the belief in the atom, which is real fetishism. Haeckel says: “For us, God is in every atom. That is moving matter.” There is a grain of truth in this, because the Spirit of God lives in every atom. It is just that the materialist regards matter as the first. For the theosophist, God is spread throughout the world: theosophy strives to draw all beings up to God. In doing so, it deifies and spiritualizes the world.

Dear attendees! Today I will speak about a very difficult, I would almost say, concerning topic: the evolution of a planet, especially in relation to the evolution of our own planet in the theosophical sense. And perhaps more than in any other of these lectures, it will be necessary today to appeal to the full impartiality of the audience. For such a way of looking at things, as one is currently almost solely accustomed to – that is, to deal with such a question as that of planetary development in a material, purely physical sense – what Theosophy has to say will, of course, have to appear quite fantastic.

Furthermore, the scope of what we have to discuss today is very broad. And the field of research involved is so remote that it is of course quite impossible for me to speak to you today in detail – in a short lecture – about the way in which such insights are gained. It is quite impossible for me to give you a derivation of what I have to say. I will only be able to relate and point out what would require many, many lectures, or even books, to be discussed in detail. I will not even be able to present the subject to you as it presents itself to the so-called occultist or secret researcher, but I will have to resort to comparisons and analogies.

I would ask you to bear in mind that the way in which I will treat the subject today is not the same way in which the secret researcher or occultist arrives at these results. Today, if any simile is used, it is only to make it possible to make oneself understood at all. The insights themselves are gained from quite different sources. And when we discuss inner development in detail in one of the next lectures, we will also learn something about the sources from which such insights as today's are drawn.

In the sense of the theosophical world view, man is – and I was able to mention this to you just now, also in connection with lectures from the last few weeks – an evolving being, a being in the process of development.

He sees a future perspective that entitles him to say that there is something spiritual, a spark of divinity, or better said, a resting place, a divine seed, in his breast. The human being of the future will be quite different from what he is today. Now the objection may be raised: How can man know what he will be in the future? He can know because he already carries the potential, the germ of the future within himself. The purpose of self-knowledge is none other than to study the potential and germs that still lie deeply hidden in the human breast today, in order to see what man can become in the future. In this way, man can see into his own future.

On the other hand, all higher beings – you know from earlier lectures that Theosophy speaks of higher beings than human beings – all divine beings are, for the theosophical worldview, entities that are similar to human beings, who have gone through their development at a similar level, albeit on different planes. One could say that the gods also served their time in humanity in earlier epochs. They were human and have already become what man will become in the future. Thus, in the theosophical world view, divine spiritual beings have advanced beyond the stage of humanity.

Man has not yet risen to the level of divinity. In this sense, we must place man in a whole sequence of entities. Then we will have created the conditions for being able to observe planetary development in the sense of spiritual research. It should be emphasized that this spiritual research, when understood in the right sense, in no way contradicts the sensual scientific research of our days, just as it does not contradict when an anatomist anatomically examines the corpse of a great artist and registers his anatomical results . Neither does it contradict what an art historian has to say about these artists, nor does what the materialist has to say about the moon, sun and earth contradict what Theosophy has to say about these heavenly bodies. The two things can coexist quite harmoniously. And even if the materially oriented researcher, from the standpoint of his conceit of infallibility, confronts the results of spiritual research with brusqueness, we must still say that such opposition is no less possible than the opposition of the anatomist who dissects a corpse and finds something to object to in what an art historian says about this person.

This said, if we look up at the heavenly bodies, where we see not only material things but also, in these things, the expression of spiritual beings, we will also find the expression for man in the thought that Goethe hinted at in “Faust” when he characterized the earth spirit:

In the flood of life, in the storm of action
I surge up and down
Weaving back and forth!
Birth and grave,
An eternal sea,
A changing weaving,
A glowing life.
So I create at the whirling loom of time
and weave the living garment of the Godhead.

Those who cannot rise to the realization that it is a reality to speak of the spirit of Mercury and the spirit of the Sun, and that what the eye sees and what we can explore with our instruments to what is spoken in theosophy is exactly the same as the external bodies of man to his soul, for such people the theosophical results will be spoken in vain.

When there was more conscious spiritual research in scholarship than there is today, the names given to our celestial bodies, especially those belonging to our solar system, were meant in a completely different sense. The old names Mercury, Mars, Jupiter, etc. did not just refer to the material bodies; in these material bodies they saw the bodies of spiritual beings. And the names applied to the spiritual entities, so that originally Mercury was the name for the planetary spirit of Mercury. The same applies to the Moon, Sun, Mars, Venus, etc. This is a prerequisite that we must adhere to if we want to understand what I have just said.

First of all, let me describe the meaning of the earth's development in a comparison. Imagine going back to an earlier point in our Earth's development, to the point in time that our natural science must also assume: namely, to the point in time before man set foot on Earth. Our natural science certainly indicates such a point in time when the various other lower beings were present in manifold forms, and a point in time when man essentially entered this Earthly development in his present form, as a sensual-real being. Don't get worked up about the form. It should mean nothing other than that if we go back in scientific research, we will find a point in time when man was not yet there.

Let us look at the earth as it presents itself at this point in time. We have the point in time when man could not have changed anything about this earth in any way. Nothing at all had been worked on by man on this earth. Because he was not there at all yet. So we have to say: the point in time we are talking about now presents us with the earth as it was prepared by the forces of nature. But for man to be able to intervene with his own cultural work – spiritually and religiously speaking – it would be as if I had to say: the earth has been handed over to man out of the hand of the gods, without human intervention.

Now, human beings are beginning to work on the earth step by step. If we follow purely historical research, we learn that this teaches us how man first began to work the earth with primitive tools. We imagine how he carried stones to both sides of the Nile and how the pyramids were formed. We look back even further, to the time when people created the first cultural works using simple flint tools. As we move forward, we see how humans increasingly came to control the forces of nature. It is then clear to us that the things we see today would not be there if human minds and hands had not worked. Let us try to imagine a time when no human hand or mind had yet worked. Try to understand what the things around you are. They are the result of natural forces, but also the result of human labor. So we look back to the point in time when human labor began.

Now let us look up to our time, when human labor has changed this planet. Let us compare the surface of our earth with the surface of yore. We put ourselves in the place of an observer who is outside our earth and compares these two points in time and can then say: This is the earth without human intervention, and then on the other hand, this is what human labor has done. This human work can continue. It will increasingly transform the Earth planet. In your mind, you can at least imagine the later stage of Earth's development, where again an unbiased observer looks at this Earth planet, but now in such a way that, when he looks at it from the outside, it would seem to him as if you were looking at this room. There is nothing here that is merely a natural phenomenon. You will find nothing of the original forces, such as they are a flowing in the open. It is all artificially constructed. So you could imagine a point in the earth's development where everything that can be transformed by human hands has actually been transformed by human hands in such a way that the observer would see an earth transformed into a work of art. Of course, nature would have to be transformed even more by human labor and conquered by humans.

But there is no reason why we should not think that electricity and other forces of nature that have been put at the service of humans, and indeed much more significant forces of the earth, can be put at the service of human culture. In the present development, we see the earth as having arrived at a goal. We do our work in such a way that man does it with this goal in mind. If we could not intervene in the growth of plants, if it were not as it has happened, we could not become master of the forces of the origin of higher living beings, but only the inanimate, mineral nature could be completely transformed, so that the form of the planet would be the result of its work at the final goal of the earth planet.

Now let us look back again to the point in time when human work had not yet begun. The theosophical worldview does not view anything that already existed or was already developed in any other way. Everything that has come into being and developed has come about in a similar way to these processes, which I have been able to hint at comparatively. The beings, of whom I have said that they have ascended from men to gods, and whom men regard as the higher ones, they did their work at that time. Just as a younger being will receive the earth planet from the hands of men when the earth has reached its goal and will then be able to continue working on it, so man received this planet from the hands of the gods. What he found, the gods had brought into being, exactly in the same way and form as man brought the earth into being. Such was the mere development of nature before there was any culture on this earth, before a simple man, with simple tools or, let us say, with his hands, somehow touched the earth, the earth was the work of the gods. From that point on, man has taken over the work of the gods in his own way.

Let us look at the matter from a different point of view, from the point of view of knowledge. Man seeks to explore what is around him, he seeks to think about what is in the world in terms of thought. I have often used the comparison: if there were no water in this glass, I could not scoop any out. All our thoughts, when we reflect on the world, have their meaning. If they are to have a meaning for the world, then they must be within the world. Of course, it would be quite ridiculous to want to think about a world in which no thoughts are embodied. When man reflects on the world and arrives at thoughts about the world, the world must have been built according to these thoughts. When man now investigates the laws and arrives at natural laws, what are these natural laws for him, which express themselves in thoughts? Nothing other than what man draws from them, similar to how he draws water from a glass. And just as the watchmaker has formed the watch according to his thoughts, and another, without knowing the watchmaker, can disassemble the watch better afterwards, so man comes and dissects the world afterwards. He does not need to know the one who put the thoughts into it. And it would be strange to say: No watchmaker put the thoughts into the watch mechanism.

More recent science has so often said: We do not need any spiritual authors of the world. Science has finally led us to understand this world in a purely mechanical way and to understand how the individual parts interlock. So we don't need a creator. — That's just as clever as claiming that because you understand how to take a watch apart, you don't need to assume a watchmaker. The fact that the world can be explained mechanically is no proof that it was not originally built according to thoughts. When we see nature in its natural forces and deduce the laws from them, for philosophy these natural forces are the expression of the original thoughts of the gods and the work of men in art, these are thoughts of a later work of the same kind as the work of the gods in nature outside. When the theosophist contemplates a rock, a crystal, or even a plant — although this is more difficult — he says to himself: All these have been created in the same way in spirit, like a machine, a work of art, like a work of art by a painter or musician. Only the latter are more recent products of the human spirit, which is a God in the making, while the former are the product of the mature spirit of God, which has long since surpassed the level of man. This is the spirit.

Now let us look at the matter in more detail. If we look at man as he is and lives today, and if we go back only a little in history, we learn that everything around us has been created relatively recently and that centuries ago man worked with very different, more primitive means of culture. And if we go further back, these means of culture become more and more primitive, and cultural history shows us that people living in the earliest times made knives and tools out of stone. So we come to a primitive man on earth who, in relation to everything that is the result of intellectual culture today, was still very far behind. The mind of the human being whom today's science likes to call prehistoric man was very primitive. We can see, then, that the ability to understand developed and took shape during this time. In this way, we ourselves trace the development of the mind. Further research into humanity in cultural history does not go any further.

But now spiritual research begins, theosophical research. It speaks in the most serious sense of the development, of the development of everything that exists in our environment. Just as the intellect has gradually developed, which at the beginning could only create very primitive means of culture such as flint knives and so on, grinding grain between two millstones, so the intellect was not only primitive, but it was not there at all. The intellect, this intellectuality has developed. Based on spiritual facts, just as our science is based on material facts, intellectuality begins to follow the things that cultural history speaks of. Cultural history extracts from the layers of the earth what it finds. Man evidently had a completely different facial expression. His brain was the tool of the spirit, which was not yet as developed as it later became. But from there we go back to even more distant primeval times. And what I have mentioned before, I have to bring up again here to make everything a whole. We come back to human ancestors who, however, cannot be shown in geology, who did not yet make tools, who did not yet have what we call intellectual power, but who had other mental abilities instead. From material natural science you know that the Earth has not always looked the same as it does today, that it has undergone continuous changes in its shape, that where there is land today there used to be sea, and where there is sea today there used to be land. The theosophical worldview speaks of facts that even the scientist at least hypothetically admits. The part of the earth's surface that is now occupied by the Atlantic Ocean, which lies between Europe, Africa and America, was once land. This is a fact for spiritual research. Arldt's treatise on Atlantis only provides information about the animal and plant world. Theosophical research, however, speaks of the human form. The intellect had not yet developed at that time; other spiritual abilities were decisive then.

You can get a rough idea of how this came about. When seeing animals migrate into dark caves, they lose their faces. Other powers develop. Strength declines. Thus, in general, in the course of development, we find that with the development of one faculty, the other must gradually recede. Thus, with the development of the mind, of intellectuality, other spiritual powers that man had in times gone by recede.

A certain kind of clairvoyance, a dim, dark clairvoyance, was an outstanding spiritual power among the population of ancient Atlantis. These were people whose forebrain was not yet developed. That was the case with the Atlantic people, whose forebrains were not developed; they were not intellectual, but they were endowed with a certain clairvoyance. They had not yet developed reflection. Therefore, [the Atlantic man] could not have any culture. He could not make knives and axes for himself, he simply lived in a completely different way, but he was clairvoyant in a certain respect. His consciousness was so developed that he could not only perceive in his surroundings that which the senses convey, that which enters the human soul through the gates of the senses, but his soul was able to perceive even more of the soul, albeit in a very shadowed way. When he came near another person, he not only perceived what the person looked like, not only perceived what the person saw, but he could vividly perceive what moral qualities the other person had. He could perceive the soul, the inner being, the instincts, the passions and desires with a completely different kind of mind. If he came near a person who had wild desires, he had something else; today we would call it hallucinations. Colorful images arose in him of what lived in that being. So a completely different perception was present in those times. This is roughly how we have characterized the Atlantean population.

Another practical activity was also linked to this cognitive activity. You can read more about these things in my magazine “Lucifer - Gnosis”, in the essays of “13”. There it is described how people worked in those days. They had no tools, but just as they were clairvoyant, they were also endowed with a certain magical power. They were able to do what people today can no longer do. They were able to promote the growth of a plant, to make it grow faster. I could tell you many other things, but I think that is enough, for it could be taken in the most serious way. You see, however, that we are looking back here to a point in our earth's development that had a very different human being. But you must bear in mind that a different being, at the center of such a development, also requires a very different environment.

If we explore the Earth itself in these ancient times, then this Earth is also quite different. The distribution of water, fog, clouds, and air that we have around the Earth today did not yet exist in ancient Atlantis. It was quite different. The air was, so to speak, almost saturated with water. We did not have to deal with such a distribution of water in the air as we do today, but with a perpetual misty air. When Germanic mythology speaks of a 'fog home', it is a memory of ancient Atlantis with its foggy air. It was only in the later process of our earth's formation that what we have in our environment today emerged. Only with this environment was the progression of sensory and intellectual development possible. Thus we look back on a different formation of man and the earth planet. In certain respects, we can regard man as divine in a spiritual sense, but he differs considerably from the spirituality of our time. The spirituality of that time has receded. But the recognition that built the mind has emerged in our time. It has pushed the other back.

There will indeed come a time when people will unite the two: self-aware intellectual knowledge with withdrawn clairvoyance. This is what is already emerging in clairvoyance as a prophecy of later epochs. The Atlanteans were not so significantly different from people today, but they were different in some ways. If I may express myself crudely and trivially, I would say that they were not yet embodied in such dense matter, they were not yet as hardened in their matter as they have been since that time. Just as you follow the animals and come up to the cartilaginous fish and bony fish, as you come to beings that are embodied in less dense matter, we also had people who had a finer organism that they then knew how to control more.

The naturalist [Lord Kelvin] takes us back to such times – albeit hypothetically. The naturalist has calculated when the earth must have been in a state that did not yet allow for life on earth. According to the amount of heat that it still loses today and that it must have possessed in the past, it must once have been so warm that creatures such as plants, animals and humans that live on it today could not have lived then. Whether this hypothesis is more or less well-founded, it is certainly ingenious and based on good foundations. It is calculated that 30 million years ago the Earth was in a state in which there was no plant kingdom, no animal kingdom and no human kingdom. These were in a completely different state from planetary beings.

Let us trace them back to a state that is more and more fluid and more and more finely material. So, what man carries as a physical body was not yet present at that time. If you hold on to the idea that I have put before you, then you will be able to visualize and imagine how the human spiritual part could have lived at that time, as well as how what is spiritual and soulful in the animal and plant world could have lived on this planet before it emerged in plants, animals and humans. We follow man from the stage when he was physically softer and then even softer, to states that appear gelatinous compared to our present flesh and further back ethereal and even earlier spiritual, so that we find him, by looking into the past, always spiritualized. This is how we have to look at all beings.

We come back to an Earth planet that in its form does not yet represent a solid skeleton for our Earth, but a soft mass of mist. If you now look further at the beings that we have traced back, we find the Earth planet by no means as material as science presents it. We find it still fluid where plant, animal and human forms have appeared. But we also find it already populated by beings in a spiritual state. Thus we see how the earth continues to develop.

I would like to make clear by means of a comparison what is of course somewhat difficult to grasp. Consider today's hard coal. You dig it out of the earth. Today it is lifeless. If you look back millions of years into the past, this coal was still within extensive forests. These forests with their undergrowth perished, were covered by the earth and transformed over millions of years into what we dig out as coal. This is the dead body of former plant formations. The plant has become stone.

So much for the external material point of view. For spiritual research, something else arises. The spiritual researcher sees how the living becomes dead, how a stone has become from the living. But spiritual research says: every stone - whether you take a rock crystal or any other rock - everything has come into being in a similar way to coal. Nothing living has come from something dead. Just as a plant would not grow out of coal, something living has never come from something dead. It is the other way around: the dead has come from the living. But what we have around us in the way of stones and rocks and crystals is nothing other than fossilized life. The inanimate emerged from the animate. Thus the earth was once a body that had nothing inanimate about it. The inanimate, the rock, is only a later phase, a precipitation from the animate. And the question is already wrongly posed if someone wants to explore how the animate arises from the inanimate, because only the inanimate arises from the animate.

When you look at a gelatinous lower animal, as we think of them in terms of materialistic science, when you imagine how their individual limbs are differentiated and how man, however, has developed out of an undifferentiated, uniform body, and how then from such a being, beings with cartilage and beings with bones arose, whose skeleton is a kind of petrification – so the whole skeleton of the earth is petrified, crystallized, it is what life has left behind. If we follow this in relation to another form of our earth, with ever thinner and thinner matter, we find: everything changes, the inanimate ceases. This thin matter is at the same time a living one. And finally – continue the same thought, I only need to hint at it – then you come back even further to times when you can find the even higher truth that just as the inanimate later arose from the animate, the material-animate arose from the spiritual in the first place. Just as the inanimate is not the origin of life, so too is mere life not the origin of spirit, but spirit is the origin of life.

However, in a remotely similar way, we have to imagine that our earth was once a spiritual being, and that life developed out of this spiritual being through a kind of hardening, just as the living later developed out of the lifeless. And so we trace the earth back to the state where it was a spiritual being. Man's soul was present in a completely different way. As we trace man further and further back, it becomes apparent that he had very different abilities, clairvoyant abilities. However, the further back we trace him, the more his independence disappears. We find him in absolute dependence as a part of the divine beings that form this earth in its original state. Thus we look back to an original state of the earth, in which man was a member of the gods, had not yet separated himself from the general divine existence, is a member of their organism, as your hand is a member of your organism.

Thus man forms a part of this spiritually conceived state of the earth; we have traced back the earth planet. Now go through again with me what is happening now in this planet Earth. We must now imagine that first the spiritual separates and leaves behind a living thing, hardens into a living thing and animates a spiritual, so that we now have an Earth that consists of spirit and matter. And the living thing is linked to a mineral and dead thing. Man is a true dual being; when we follow him, we must follow how, on the one hand, the physical organism has developed and, on the other hand, a spiritual element has developed. This spirit was originally contained in the spirit-earth. However, the spirit must be thought of in a completely different direction of development than the body. Compare: When you see the body, it appears, according to its external structure, as the perfect embodiment of this external sensual being. In terms of its spirit, it appears in such a way that we see a magnificent, powerful future. Our mental and spiritual qualities appear to us only as an inclination. This will make the idea plausible that we are dealing with two directions of development on our earth.

First of all, we have to observe the initial state of our earth. It develops in such a way that, up to a certain point in time, minerals, plants and animals and the human form, this being of sense, have separated out. This leads us to the point in time when they become the bearers of spirit. Then they are fertilized by a part that has not been absorbed into the matter that was formed earlier. Let us make a comparison. If someone comes to you and says: Here I have water. That is a certain substance, and I will cool this water in one part, so that ice floes arise. — If someone said: The ice is also water, only in a different form, so we would have to admit that. But if someone would come and wanted to say: It is ice and not water, that would be nonsense. So we can also say: Matter is nothing else but spirit. It is to spirit as ice is to water; it is spirit condensed, hardened, crystallized, if you will.

Let us follow the spiritual state of the earth up to a certain point in time. Then the spirit transforms itself into this material form. People, animals, plants and minerals arise. That is the point in time that I characterized earlier, the point in time when no human being has yet worked on this earth out of inner impulse. The being of feeling was there, just as the ice is in the water. Imagine the ice in the middle, but there is still water around it. As soon as man had reached the necessary perfection as a being of sense, he was given the opportunity to receive the spiritual spark and to be enlivened by it. He received the divine spark from the spiritual. Man had reached a certain level of development in terms of the senses. He is a real witness of the spirit and begins as a small god to continue the work of the earlier gods as his cultural work.

So you can imagine the development of a planet from the spirit to life and from there to the inanimate. The highest living being is fertilized by the spirit and the further work of the spiritual up to its peculiarity through matter. There we have a planet before us. Now you will ask: This Earth planet, where did it get the possibility to crystallize out of itself precisely this mineral kingdom with crystals formed in such a way, with plants, animals and human beings formed in such a way? — If something is to crystallize in the glass, then the forces that can accomplish the crystallization must prevail in this form.

Within the theosophical worldview, we know that every person has an eternal, imperishable core of being that did not come into being at the moment of birth. We know the doctrine of repeated lives on earth. We know that people have certain destinies for the simple reason that in past lives on earth, each person has prepared everything for himself. We have been given an account of the development of the soul in various earthly lives in various lectures, and we have seen that this life comes between two incarnations. Man is nothing other than the re-embodiment of a previous human being. We know this from the doctrine of re-embodiment and karma.

In a universal sense, we are dealing with an incarnation of the planets themselves. Just as the person who does not believe in spiritual miracles, but in spiritual natural facts, does not allow the soul of the person to arise out of nothing, just as little did the scholars of the 17th century allow earthworms to arise out of the river mud. So it is nothing more than the spiritual-soul developing only out of the spiritual-soul. This is certain from the experience of earlier developmental facts. Likewise, we have to consider the fact that the earth is now excavating such plants, animals and human forms out of itself. We have to look for the cause in earlier embodiments of our earth. Just as there is an interim period between two human incarnations, there is an interim period between two planetary incarnations. Just as we speak of people, of incarnations, so we speak of planets, of “Manvantars”. Thus we see that the earth is a re-incarnated planet from the past, and between two such planets there is an interval, a “Pralaya”. So we look back to a different state in which this earth was not yet such a planet as it is today, but we look back to an imperfect state of our earth. Just as a person in today's incarnation has abilities and powers that he has acquired from events and experiences in life, so the Earth as a whole has evolved from previous incarnations in order to get to know the regular formations of minerals, plants and animals. So we have our present planet and a predecessor. A few more words about this predecessor. What were the obvious characteristics of this predecessor? Spiritual research can trace them exactly, but I do not want to present them to you today because they seem to be plucked out of thin air. What abilities did it acquire to bring people so far that they could be fertilized by a spirit? Up to that point, man had been a kind of higher animal, he had come close to the point where development begins. I can only hint at the rest. To understand the progress that has taken place from an earlier planet to our present one, we have to realize the real meaning of the development of the earth. Occultism tells us that this meaning is as follows. The occultist knows that the spirit of the earth's development is love, and the spirit of the previous one is wisdom. In our stages of development, love is expressed, and in the earlier ones, wisdom. You can also understand this comparatively. If you understand it, you will find that our entire material earthly structure is embodied wisdom. Look at the rock crystal. You have to study, apply reason, to understand, you have to calculate. The spirit that you draw out must have been put in. Natural scientists have not yet come to understand these forms. The further we penetrate, the more we will understand that we are not dealing with unwisdom, but with wisdom. If you see a human thigh bone, look at it through a microscope. You will not find a compact mass. You will find fine beams, more beautiful than the best house. Because everything is stretched out there so that the greatest load can be carried with the least expenditure of energy. If a beam is placed at a certain angle, material can be saved. Here the miracle is performed.

The anatomist knows how the miracle of the human heart moves us, and that it is more perfect than what man develops in his soul today. These are passions, desires. No matter how he purifies them, they are not like the miracle of the heart. Man drinks coffee, tea, beer and thereby inhibits or stimulates the activity of the heart. You can trace a structure full of wisdom through the entire development of the earth. This is what has developed as a material framework. We look back on a framework that was nothing more than the basis for a new incarnation. Everything that was built as a framework was determined at that time. What is happening on earth now is the result of the passions, instincts and desires that were aroused and caused then. Look at an uncivilized 'Negro'; his soul blindly follows instincts, passions. There are no moral concepts. Man devours his fellow man. Gradually, the soul purifies itself. But wise is the basic structure, which is so imperfect in its passions. When the earth's development began again, it shaped the previously acquired basic structure again. What should happen on this earth is the purification of instincts, passions and instincts. Everything has been created, including the wise structure of how instincts and drives, moral concepts and so on, religious creativity and the sense of a soul arise from our earth. Thus, piece by piece, they originate from the earlier elementary states, like the wisdom of the structure of our basic framework.

Do not believe that out of nothing, this or that, the thigh or the heart, is formed out of nothing and thus becomes the bearer of passions and morals. To come from blind drives and instincts to the purity of moral wisdom, this wisdom of the basic structure had to grow out of long experience. This heart had to develop out of the experiences of the earlier planetary spirit. So the wisdom that underlies the basic structure of our earth is the experience of an earlier planetary incarnation of the earth spirit. On earth we have a different purpose. Here, wisdom is not experienced, here what has been wisely built up is instilled, instilled - the ennobling of drives, desires and passions. The beings ennoble themselves by living in an external relationship to each other. This external relationship of the earthly world is egoism, as it exists in all beings. It is love. This tendency of the development of love is just as much the meaning of the development of the earth as the development towards wisdom was the meaning of the predecessor of the development of the earth. When the development of the earth has reached its goal, then everything that is still egoism in man and in other beings today will have been transformed into love.

And the next incarnation will carry love within it, just as the earth carried wisdom within it. Thus an original planet that acquires wisdom passes into everything that people accomplish here in the development of the earth into an embodied love. When we look into the future, it means a perspective view, a view to the fact that man deifies himself and makes himself the bearer of love, in order to then give it back to his successor, and to whom he will belong again as a higher being, like the higher developed beings who presided over the development of the earth and still preside over it today.

Now I can only add what real occultism has to say about the outer presentation of this meaning of development. Just as something always has to be discarded when a higher development takes place, so it is with today's plants. Originally they did not exist in this form. They can only flourish on soil that is mineral; they can grow out of it. If we are talking about a life that was originally mere and about the fact that the mineral aspect has only gradually emerged, then our present-day plants were not present in the original life, but other plant forms were. These plant forms have, on the one hand, developed in relation to the mineral kingdom and, on the other hand, further developed into the present-day plant kingdom, which will not live without the mineral kingdom. That is the meaning of higher development: it is based on something. The plant has pressed down part of the mineral kingdom on which it stands. The animal kingdom has excreted the plant kingdom and feeds on it. The plant kingdom assimilates the carbon dioxide that humans exhale and exhale oxygen, which humans need. If you look into the human world itself, you can see that man, as master of the outer world, can only live on the basis of the 13th chapter of the Gospel of John, where Christ Jesus shows that he is aware that a higher being can only rise on the basis of a lower one, just as a plant can only rise on mineral soil, an animal on vegetable soil. Everything is helpful and healing on the soil of the apostles. Hence the great gratitude expressed in the parable of the washing of the feet. The spirit is at the same time the origin of this soil, but the substantiality of the soil must always be withdrawn so that something finer and younger can develop on it.

Thus the later form that spirituality took could only develop by excluding matter. Just as the original life expelled the mineral kingdom, so the moon was also expelled. Thus the matter of the moon is to be regarded as the rejected brother of the development of the earth, which was united with it in its earlier planetary existence. The moon has been cast off and still has a spiritual connection to the earth. It is necessary for this earth as the mineral kingdom is for the plant kingdom, as the plant kingdom is for the animal kingdom.

If we go further back, we will not only see the earth united with the moon, with what the secret researchers have called the moon, today's moon is only the cast-out corpse. It is similar with the sun. I have been able to show you a perspective of how the theosophical view looks at planetary development. The planets as they appear to us in the sky today present themselves in a certain relationship for the theosophical research. What is the sun today, what is the moon today, has emerged in the course of development. They represent other phases of development. If you look back to your own origin and source, you will be able to say to the child: This represents my own development. In a sense, the occultists see the planets in this way, so that they appear as childhood stages compared to the development of the earth. Other planets appear as those that have reached the stage in which the earth is today much earlier.

Thus, occultists present this development in such a way that they place the seven planets in a series that has a relationship in its individual links, as it is expressed in the successive stages of human development. Just as this represents that which can also stand side by side, so for the secret researcher this side by side is represented in that which each individual can also go through, namely: this development through forms that are preserved in the planets neighboring the earth. This is expressed by the science of secret in mnemonic signs. These are the names of the days of the week. “Cheap philosophy” — many will object. In the seven days of the week, the planets represent their own development on Earth. We have to start from Saturday. The development of Mars takes place on Earth. Secret research calls the development of Mercury the development in which man intervenes and which will persist until the end of the development. So this is how it corresponds:

Saturday: Saturn,
Sunday: the Sun
Monday: the Moon
Tuesday: Mars
Wednesday: Mercury
Thursday: Jupiter
Friday: Venus

Thus, in the names of the days of the week in the most diverse languages, you have a marker for planetary development everywhere.

[IMAGE REMOVED FROM PREVIEW]

I was only able to follow this development for a short distance, namely from the Earth to the Moon. So you can see that and how meaning and significance is added to this development through theosophical research. Those who not only have a feeling for our research, but also for the deeper forces, for the forces in development, have always understood that the earth comes from a development and progresses to a further development, that it is the planet that represents the stage of development of love, and that wisdom develops through love into a higher form. The next thing that surrounds us is the floods of the development of the earth planet, which present themselves as a tendency towards love.

One of the great minds sensed this in a poem when he wanted to express the meaning of the earth's development, when he looked up at the next goal of the earth's development, when he looked up at what man cannot look beyond. Then it appeared to him like a glance of the divine spirit, like a circle in which the infinity of the divine spirit can express itself. It seems as if the development of humanity, the whole meaning of planetary development, can express itself in the small spirit of the earth. But the spirit of the earth reveals to him what its essence is, what has become of earlier forces, and what will be transformed into later forces. And if I speak from the human point of view, the meaning of planetary development appears to us as development towards love. This is also expressed by Dante, the great thinker and poet, in the words:

The orbiting that was received in you
showed itself, like reflected light,
when I observed it for a while all around,
seemed to me in itself, in its own coloring
painted with our image,
which is why my gaze was completely absorbed in it.
Just as the geometrician becomes completely absorbed
in measuring out the compass and, pondering,
cannot find the principle he needs:
so it was with me at that new sight.
I wanted to see how the image related to the circle
and how it fitted into it;
but for this, not only my own wings were not enough,
my spirit was not struck by lightning,
which brought it what it longed for.
Here the power of the lofty imagination broke,
but already my desire and will moved,
like a wheel that drives the same revolution,
love that moves the sun and stars.

There have always been great searching minds. There have always been epochs in which the human mind sought to penetrate into the deepest questions; at the end of the eighteenth and the beginning of the nineteenth century, it was particularly astonishing. In the German thinkers, we find the highest level of training. But precisely these important ones have become the least known. One man stands at the top: Johann Gottlieb Fichte. Who knows and still reads his “Addresses to the German Nation” today?

Fichte's world view is a difficult one, so let us first take a look at Immanuel Kant. Kant, so to speak, set firm limits to human knowledge. He sought the thing in itself. He did not penetrate into its depths. Fichte went beyond him in a way. The Age of Enlightenment began with Kant. He said: “Man, you shall dare to use your own reason.” This caused the old belief in authority to falter. Stirring memories of the spirit of enlightenment came from France. Rousseau's spirit had a powerful effect on Kant. Materialism appeared there first, and the spirit of enlightenment also made itself felt in Germany; but something else was added there.

Lessing, in his “Education of the Human Race”, showed how he had been seized by this spirit of enlightenment; but with him, for the first time, we encounter a new idea, the idea of re-embodiment. He said: “Is not all eternity mine?” Through many lives, man walks the path to perfection. We see how Goethe showed us the great idea of re-embodiment in great images. That was Fichte's “deed”: Fichte showed in his teaching of science that man has to find the “I” within himself, and it was precisely this that was difficult for man to grasp. Fichte said: The great thing is that man himself says “I” to himself. No one can call out “I” to us from the outside. It is the only name that only we can give ourselves; it is the designation of our unique nature in relation to nature. It is there that the God in man begins to speak. With this, man has begun to ascend to ever higher levels. In 1800, Fichte wrote “On the Destiny of Man”. One should not read it, but live it, let it take effect on oneself. He suggests observing our inner life, immersing ourselves in the inner power of our nature in order to come to the certainty of our eternal essence. In his booklet “Instructions for a Blessed Life” he shows that the I has always lived in us and will always live in us. In such German writings you receive the best theosophical training.

Novalis was an eminently theosophical spirit; he died at the age of 29 as a mining engineer. He himself felt that his mathematics was a great poem. In this he recalls Pythagoras' saying that there is music of the spheres in it. Novalis sensed the movement in the universe as harmonious tones. For him, the starry world was a world built according to mathematical principles — just as the harmonies that one perceives in music can also be calculated. He also sensed and thought the layers of the earth. It was clear to Novalis that man must develop his inner senses. In “The Apprentices of Sais” he clearly stated that man is related to God and the whole world – Pictures: Hyacinth, a beautiful boy, loves the beautiful Rose Child. He owes the realization of the human ego to Fichte.

Another thinker: Schelling. In his 1809 publication “On Human Freedom”, he seeks to bring out Jakob Böhme's ideas. He is concerned with the interesting research into the origin of evil. I can only hint at a comparison today: everyone will see harmony at the bottom of everything. But how does disharmony come about? How can man come to freedom? By also having the possibility of doing evil. Schelling says: the divine good is like sunlight. When light throws light into darkness, it awakens shadows. The light would not be able to develop its power if there were nothing to cast the shadows. — Jakob Böhme calls it the counter-throw. Darkness is precisely the nothing. The something, the good, can only be understood by the fact that evil is a nothing, only a shadow. Schelling also called human beings, as a physical body, a perfection. Hands, for example, are perfect and independent, but can scratch themselves if they turn against each other. — Conversation: Clara and Benno. He had been silent for a long time, then Frederick William IV appointed him to the University of Berlin. Then he wrote “Philosophy of Mythology” and “Philosophy of Revelation”. He speaks there of ancient mysteries. What is a mystery? If we go far back behind Homer to the culture of the Greek secret schools, temple cults, we see that the disciples first had to observe the external drama, the God who descends into nature, who is hidden in all four realms, who only awakens in man. In the human breast is the place of the resurrection of God. This was not art, religion, science, it was all three at once: beauty, religion and piety. It was only later that truth, beauty and piety, science, art and religion separated. The mysteries illustrated this. In Schelling you can find the most beautiful in his “Mystical Revelations”.

Heinrich Kleist: “Käthchen von Heilbronn”, “Prinz von Homburg”. The former cannot be understood if one denies hypnosis and does not look deeper into the soul life. Kleist delved deeply into Schubert's philosophical lectures, which he heard in Dresden at the time, about dreams and the interior of the soul, and through this he gained those thoughts.

Justinus Kerner found a way to study the abnormal soul life with the seer of Prevorst. She came into a spiritual and mental environment in that state. This has many concerns. While the physical body rested during sleep, the soul perceived conditions in its environment. Kerner said: “For her, the state of constant illness is a constant dying.” Eckartshausen presents everything in an idealized way up to a certain point.

Ennemoser was somewhat superficial.

This chain of theosophical thinkers provided deep insights into the further development of humanity, showed the eternal core of being in individuality, and demonstrated re-embodiment.

What significance does the personality have for the being? It gains experience in thinking, feeling and willing. It does not discard this experience when it dies like a garment; no, life was a school for it, and what it took in during its lifetime, it takes with it as treasure into its new existence. A human being would have lived in vain if that were not the case. Thus, with each life, the individuality becomes richer. Everything that the personality has collected is the pearls of a pearl necklace. The personality is the tool for developing out of life. Earth life is what makes us more perfect. The personality lays the foundation for development.

Certain Western views underestimate the personality and believe that we simply shed our personality at death. No, we take its fruits with us. It is valuable to learn what the personality means. And all those spirits are masters at describing the personal. The mission of the German spirit at that time was to emphasize what is pure and beautiful and noble in the personality. And this is precisely what Theosophy shows: beautiful, pure and lofty thinking. Each age has its task and mission. That was the mission of German philosophy. The great minds have been almost completely forgotten, and it is our duty to learn from them. The most wonderful fruits can be gained there. Then one will truly understand the energy that emanated from those minds. “Man can do what he should, and when he says, 'I cannot,' he will not.” There were two great eras: the first when the Vedanta philosophy emerged in Asia in the post-Vedic period, the second at the beginning of the nineteenth century in Germany. On both occasions, the human mind experienced its greatest depth. During this time, will and strength were directed towards the ideal.

Nature is a great living thing,
And everything is fruit, and everything is seed.

Just as a person seeks like-minded people among his contemporaries for intimate thinking and feeling, so it also satisfies him to occupy himself with great minds of the past. The Theosophical worldview does not yet provide an opportunity for this – but people are beginning to occupy themselves with it. It is still a young spiritual movement.

One who comes as close as possible to the theosophical views is Paracelsus. He lived in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries and was a naturalist and physician. He combined in himself the wisdom and knowledge of his time and can still be a guiding light and teacher today. He has been unfairly criticized and slandered; he is said to have been a debauchee and to have enjoyed wine and the tavern more than his profession. But anyone who takes the trouble to study him recognizes in him the wisest and most intrepid champion of a high school of thought. He lived from 1493 to 1541, that is, at a time when the ideas of the Middle Ages began to give way to new views. Today's science does not yet understand him; it has so far been materialistic in direction; that too brought great things. Humanity had to limit itself to the external world. Today, when we are in the process of going far beyond doubt and ignorance, it is different. He lived by his motto: “No one should be another's servant, each should be a servant to himself alone.” According to this motto, he investigated everything that was accessible to him for the investigation of the spiritual foundations of things. But everything he investigated, he put at the service of medicine and the health care of mankind. His aim was to be of help.

What was the state of the art of healing at that time? It was completely under the influence of medieval pharmacology – Galen – and had degenerated. People tried to cure illnesses with trivial means, and he humorously describes how the doctors of the time only knew a few rules and applied them without understanding. Then Paracelsus decided to bid farewell to all this bookish wisdom. He wanted only one great teacher and to study him thoroughly: nature! She was to be his teacher and his teaching. The teacher should pass the nature exam. In doing so, he carried out this precept in the spirit of his motto. Lonely and independent, he went his way and sought to learn wherever he could learn something.

The doctor at that time had estranged himself from nature; but he had the instinctive feeling: there are secret relationships that humans and all of nature have to one another. He said to himself: “When humans develop in a wrong relationship, then they lose something of the more intimate relationship to nature.” When the cow seeks its food, it finds exactly what it needs. It has a more intimate relationship with the natural product - a bond - that it feels. The more man lives in stereotyped concepts, the more he loses the context. To feel something specific in every plant, in every mineral, is a gift. Man should not only see something shiny in gold, silver, and mercury.

Paracelsus assumes that the relationship between all of these and the human being can be found. Thus, his intuitive instinct distinguishes the power inherent in nature – and that is the healing power. We sense this power in the relationship between the sexes; it is something that attracts two beings to each other. Such attraction must exist between people and all natural products. This sympathy and antipathy cannot be taught by books; it comes only through the inner enlightenment of the soul.

You become a doctor by making yourself a different person and developing that power within you. Paracelsus gained this directly from nature; he wanted to get to know the relationship that man has with plants, trees, shrubs, with nature - and he listened to what his heart and soul said. He traveled far, to the south and to the north, and he said of himself: “I have never been afraid to learn, not even on the streets from vagrants.”

He gained a vast amount of experience for his medical profession. He was also filled with a certain pride, which was justified because he felt free and independent from his anxious predecessors when he said the proud words: “If you want the truth, follow me.” This is how he related to the surrounding nature. What had built up in him was a knowledge of man, which Theosophy has now to recapture.

In what we call the physical body, only a part, and indeed the lowest, of the human being can be seen. Theosophy calls the next higher link of the human being the etheric body. The same forces and substances as in this human body are also in animals, plants and minerals. Science is not aware of these finer forces because they are not just a product of chemical composition, nor is it aware that the etheric body exists before the physical body.

Before the etheric body, theosophy knows of another. Matter crystallizes out of itself into the physical body; comparable to how ice crystallizes out of water. The etheric body is the basic template. The astral body is the third link; this has formed the etheric body through its condensation. The astral body is the outer form for desires and instincts. The physical is created out of the spiritual and the soul.

Even higher is the “ego” of the human being, which is connected to the divine. The divine is the original, and this is also how Paracelsus views the world. He also initially speaks of the physical body. This is the seat of the animal life force, which the theosophist describes as the etheric body, whereas Paracelsus calls it the elementary body. Paracelsus was already using the term “astral body” to describe the third body; he also sometimes called it the sidereal body. He said: Within the physical body is the elementary body, within that is the sidereal body and within that is the divine spark. As an external human being, he is related to the elements: water, earth, air and fire. Through astral qualities, he is related to the worlds of the stars and through divine qualities to the invisible divine world. He needed a simile: Imagine an apple and its core, and you will say that the core of the apple has separated from the basic substance; the elementary body is in the apple flesh, the sidereal body in the core from the substance of the world of stars, and the innermost, divine, comes from the divine.

Paracelsus found threefold relationships within himself; first of all, to nature; furthermore, he had a fine relationship to the stars; he felt sympathetically attracted and antipathically repelled, and thus had relationships to the whole cosmos. Finally, however, he also felt divine relationships to everything divine in the wide universe. He said: The physical is built out of the spiritual, then it has separated itself from the spiritual. Do not seek the source of the disease in the elemental, but in the sidereal. Where there are symptoms of illness, relationships are not in the right proportion. Knowledge of disease involves three things: firstly anatomy, secondly astrology, thirdly knowledge of the divine forces, theology. Only in the totality of these three - that is, in the whole knowledge of the world - is the basis for understanding disease.

If Paracelsus needed a basis, he searched for the spiritual, for the invisible within the visible. When he observed the magnetic force in iron, how iron attracts or repels, he imagined the magnet to be composed of iron, attraction and repulsion.

Now he discovered that within the sidereal body there is something like [a] magnet. Therefore, he examined the magnetic forces and applied magnets to people. Wherever forces are destroyed in the human being, he sought to have a healing effect on them. Paracelsus called for the study of the higher worlds from the physician. Therefore, he was also concerned with the sleeping person and the world of dreams, and he observed what changes there. He painted a wonderful picture: the sleeping person with his physical and elementary bodies has been left by the astral body, and there it lives with the whole world of the stars and carries on the balancing star talk; that is why it has such a refreshing effect on the physical body. Thus the astral body receives the effect of the forces in the world of the stars.

Those who look so deeply into the workings of nature can also use spiritual means. From the starry sky, he knew how to get the things that worked on his sick. Today, one would speak of hypnotism. It is a mistake to believe that every idea has a healing effect; only certain ideas can have an effect; abstract concepts have no effect on the soul. Paracelsus used the word “imagination” and by that meant the transformation of the concept into an image. He believed that one should create entirely pictorial ideas and place very specific feelings into this image. Then the picture gains the power to affect the particular soul. Consider how Paracelsus, as a great healer of souls, affected the physical! He achieved nothing that occult schools do not aspire to. There, very specific exercises are done in which certain geometric figures, which make up a complete system, are placed before the soul of the person. Then the secret student has to evoke a certain feeling with a certain figure, and then what is called imagination develops.

Paracelsus formed a picture of how man relates to nature in a truly theosophical way. If he found that some kind of passion lived in a person, he sought the counter-image for this whole spiritual person outside in nature; thus nature became a mirror image for nature. The human passions, anger, rage, cunning - which are inwardly mental, are reflected in images of the animal world; and for everything that the etheric body builds up, there is a counter-image in the plant world. Paracelsus found the healing in that which is in harmony with the sick person. In nature, he saw, as it were, the human being laid out in compartments. He spoke a wonderful word: the whole of nature consists of individual letters and together these form the word “human being”. Of the insane, he said: the astral body is always healthy when it surrenders to the sidereal forces. But if the connection is clouded, then there are clouded rays. The soul is always healthy in the insane, it only shines through clouded rays.

I have only been able to give you a brief sketch of his penetrating research here. Goethe followed a similar line. He had recognized the relationship to nature. In “Faust”, where Faust encounters sublime nature, he has him say:

Exalted Spirit, thou gavest, thou givest me everything.
[Why I asked. Thou didst not in vain
Turn thy face to me in the fire.
Gavest me the glorious nature for a kingdom,
Strength to feel it, to enjoy it. Not
You only allow coldly amazed visitors,
granting me the gift of looking into their deep chests,
as into the bosom of a friend.
You lead the line of the living
before me, and teach me my brothers
in the silent bush, in air and water.]

As you know, the saying that serves as the leitmotif of this lecture can be found in Goethe's “Faust”. This, his greatest work, has given rise to so many explanations that a whole library could be filled with them. The sentence spoken by Mephistopheles is sometimes explained in very peculiar ways. It is not possible to discuss them all here, but I would like to refer you to Professor Minor, who wrote a three-volume commentary on Faust. He gives the following explanation: Mephistopheles says mockingly, “Blood is a very special juice,” because he does not like blood and therefore demands a signature that is written in blood.

Faust enters into a pact with the emissary of hell; Goethe took this motif, like the material of the Faust saga in general, from German legends. The fact that Faust, the representative of humanity striving for the highest, should sign over his soul with blood is already known in the oldest Faust books – as early as the sixteenth century. He has to cut his hand, dip the pen into the blood, write his name, and then the words are said to have appeared in the coagulated blood: “Man, escape” — and yet blood should be something that Mephisto could not stand? On the contrary, it must be something very precious to him; that is Goethe's opinion of this passage in his great poem. From the standpoint of spiritual research, we can approach the significance of blood for life by considering the question: What actually is this blood? — This question is not to be treated scientifically; from the standpoint of spiritual science, we can look more deeply into the nature of man. We see the undercurrent of this saying for the entire historical development of man, so that we can at least answer the question in a certain direction. In doing so, we want to start from a saying that comes from an ancient teacher of the Egyptian secret schools, Hermes Trismegistus:

Everything below is like everything above!

“Above” refers to the spiritual world, “below” to the physical world; for the mystic, everything spiritual is “above” in the sense of Hermetic theosophy.

When we look at a person, we first see their physical appearance, their body; but we not only suspect, we know that a spiritual essence dwells within this body. We see the spiritual being revealed through the physical; the physical shows what moves the person at the bottom of their soul. We see their joy in their smile, their suffering in their tears. The entire physical aspect is a testimony of the spiritual. The spirit has built up the body: a lovely appearance as the image of a lovely soul; a brutal physical appearance, built up by a brutal spirit. We call the soul-spiritual the “upper”, the physical is the “lower”. Plato spoke of the “upper” as the archetype of things. Everything that surrounds us is the image of a spiritual reality. The world of archetypes is the “upper world”. Just as the shadow on the wall is the image of the object, so the lower world is the faithful reflection of the upper. Those who look at the world with spiritual eyes see not only the material; they see not only the eye and the ear, the body and its limbs, in the human form; they also perceive a soul behind it.

The sum of all physical phenomena in nature: forests, fields, plants, minerals, yes, the heavenly and planetary bodies are the expression of a spiritual world. Every time we see something in the lower, we can conclude that there is something corresponding in the upper. Man gets to know the lower in his everyday experience; the scientist examines it with instruments. The spiritual researcher shows us the archetypes – the upper aspect. We will understand things when we recognize the upper aspect for each lower aspect.

In this way, we will also come to know the human being when, after having observed the blood with the nervous system and the heart, we then search for what prevails in them, what corresponds to them in the upper aspect, when we ask: What is the spirit of the blood?

In the same way, we want to understand the human being by considering what the spiritual archetype of blood is. To do this, we have to follow the path of human development together.

What is the essence of the human being according to spiritual science? We get to know the upper part of the human being through the connecting link, starting from the body. For materialism, this is everything. Bones, digestive and respiratory organs, nerves, reproductive and circulatory systems make up the physical body. What we know about the human being consists entirely of the same substances that make up the things found in nature. The same matter is everywhere in the world, even in minerals.

Theosophy or spiritual science distinguishes, in addition to the body that we have in common with all inanimate nature, an etheric or life body, but understands it to mean something different from the physicist's understanding of ether. While science previously assumed only the physical, it too has recently come to recognize a kind of life principle. But while science reaches its knowledge only through logic and reasoning, the theosophist has gained his knowledge by developing abilities within himself that lie dormant in everyone. We call such a developed person an “awakened one,” that is, the spiritual world opens up to him.

The more organs a person has, the more worlds can be opened up to him. Through self-development, through self-perfection, he can attain higher development. Then he can see the etheric body, which underlies the physical body as a very fine body. Everything that lives in a person comes from the etheric body. Plants have this in common with us; just as color belongs to the flower, so the etheric body belongs to the physical body for those who can see it. Many say that it is immodest to claim such a thing and think that no one can know this. But it is much more immodest to say this, because those who have not seen the matter cannot decide, but those who see can. No one can say more than: I do not know —, just as little as a blind man can claim that there are no colors because he does not see them.

The third link of the human being arises when one seeks the vehicle for everything that is named: desire, lust, passion, pain. Not only blood and nervous systems are in man, but just as real are those phenomena. We call its carrier the “astral body”. We have it in common with the whole animal world. But what makes man the crown of all creation, what makes him rise above the animal world; what he has for himself alone, is the fourth limb, the ego body. This is what distinguishes him from all beings except himself; out of this he develops further and further upwards. We recognize this when we compare an uncultivated person with a cultured person. — example of Darwin and the man-eater. — The I, which is already in him, has not yet worked on the astral body.

We therefore usually distinguish two parts of the astral body: the one part that the human being receives, and the other that he has worked into it. The astral body transformed by the I is the spiritual self or manas.

We can also work on our etheric body; many principles and moral ideas, which are still rooted in the astral body, also extend as forces into the etheric realm, for example, art. What a person absorbs from a work of art has an effect on the etheric body; the same applies to what is achieved through religion. We also distinguish two parts in it: the received and the worked-in spirit of life. We call this Budhi. A chela acquires the ability to work more and more into it; spiritual training is a working out of the etheric body. Finally, such a working out of the physical body can also take place through special spiritual abilities. The theosophist calls the spiritualized part through which man stands in relation to the whole cosmos “Atman” or the real spirit of man. Thus we distinguish seven aspects in the human being. These aspects of the human being are not to be understood as separate parts, but rather as seven levels, degrees of his being, like the tones of a scale or the colors of the rainbow. The last three levels: Manas, Budhi, Atma, make up the archetype of the human being - the upper part.

Man has not had these seven members from the beginning; only gradually have they been developed with the physical body; in the original state, only the predispositions for this physical body are found. Man is an image of the whole cosmos. Cuvier, the important naturalist, says: For the one who studies animal anatomy, the smallest member is an image of the whole body. From the peculiar shape of a bone, he can deduce the shape of the whole body. In each individual there is an image of the whole universe. If a being who is able to see through this were to come to our world from another world and see only a rock crystal, it could deduce from it what the whole world should be like. Each one that can internalize the external becomes a mirror of the whole universe. The human physical body cannot be regarded as a mirror of the universe in itself; it is only through the etheric body that it is internalized, and internalization continues through the etheric body. In the animal, external life is reflected in inner consciousness. In the plant, we do not yet have consciousness. Consciousness does not depend on external stimuli, but is present where external stimuli are reflected internally: in the animal.

In the human being, this consciousness expresses itself in the first formation of the nervous system. This nervous system is the so-called sympathetic or digestive system, solar plexus, arising on the sides of the spinal cord – it is an organ of consciousness. To observe the human being in this stage as a being with only this system of consciousness requires a training such as the Hindu receives in the yoga training. When the brain and spinal cord systems are not active in him, the human being sees an unknown world shining within him, a consciousness that was once his own: dull and dim, a kind of omniscience. The whole universe is reflected in this consciousness; it depends on the nature of the universe. It can reflect everything that shines into it from the universe, but it cannot give anything itself.

When the soul begins to integrate the ego into the tripartite body, it integrates itself into the spinal cord. Only with this does the possibility arise for an inner life to develop; only with this is the human being able to react to attacks... [gap]

In no physical body could self-awareness take root without the blood system. The blood system, in which inner warmth can develop, the red, warm human blood must be there for the ego to reveal itself. The blood is the carrier of self-awareness in a being. Therefore, if you have found the way to his blood, you have also found the way to his self; what affects the blood affects the self. It is not the ego that is or creates the blood; the astral body does that. Only when the astral body has created the blood is the ego able to dwell in it. One can receive knowledge from a person, learn many things, and in the same way one can teach another and make communications to him; but one has access to the particular individuality of a person only when his blood is affected, set in faster or slower motion. The particular juice provides access to the ego. Control over the blood makes one the master of the person.

How does one influence the blood? I would like to refer to a conversation between two well-known men: Anzengruber, the playwright, and Rosegger, the writer who portrayed Austrian rural life. Anzengruber spent his whole life in the city – and yet, with what genius he brought the figures of the rural world to the stage! Rosegger said to him: “Perhaps it would be better for you to study the farmers.” To which Anzengruber replied: “I wouldn't be able to do that; I can't do it by observation, it's in my blood. My ancestors were farmers, and when I am left to myself, it takes care of itself.”

There is a deep truth in this, and to explore it, we need to consider the nature of consanguinity. We speak of consanguinity, but in reality not a single drop of the father's blood passes into that of the son. Quite different organs are related, like the blood system. This forms itself at the latest in the embryo. If a similar organism descends from another, something similar is expressed in the blood. It is not the blood that is related, but that which is expressed in the blood, which moves it, warms or cools it. The relationship lies in the soul, which underlies the physical.

Among all peoples we find in ancient times that marriages were contracted within the near-kith and kin; small tribal unions married within the kin. It was a crime to marry outside the tribe, outside the blood relationship. All mankind has worked its way out of this.

From the near-marriage later developed the far-marriage. Tacitus, for example, in his “Germania”, gives a glimpse of how distant marriage developed from close marriage. At the moment this happens, a very special phenomenon appears: somnambulistic clairvoyance. For example, in 1000 and 900 BC, the ancient Greeks had the ancient clairvoyance; all legends originated from this state. Clairvoyance ceases when long-distance marriage occurs. Where form mixes with foreign form, something is expressed in the blood that does not belong to the common stock. This process was a change to the intellectual view in all peoples. Formerly, the process was similar for an old clairvoyant as it is today for a medium. To recall this state in our time would be an anachronism, as it was the natural state in the past; every child did not absorb from the outside, but felt within himself what was related to his tribe. When foreign blood was added, the person grew out of his tribe. Whereas in the past what was in the generations was expressed in the blood, later it was expressed in what the external senses conveyed. As a last remnant, although not quite like the old seer, Anzengruber feels not only what he himself feels as a human being, as an individual person, but also what his father has experienced. Hence the veneration of the ancestors, because and where one still felt their direct influence.

Thus there used to be an inner knowledge that the old sages exude from within, that emanates from systems that live below the blood, a knowledge of the whole universe; the knowledge that flows in from within instead of what later in human life gained control over one's blood from the outside. Now the influx from the outside has control over one's blood.

Genesis speaks of people living to be 800 and 900 years old. This can also be explained from what has been said before: in ancient times, not just a person was named with a name, but everything that the ego can encompass; a person who remembered not only what he, but also what his father and grandfather experienced, everything that could be summarized as a common memory, was given a common name. As age diminishes, so does memory, namely everything that is imprinted in the blood of a generation, we have the transition from close marriage to long-distance marriage.

Thus it is already evident in the Bible that whoever has a person's blood has the person himself. What has an effect in people inscribes itself in the blood, insofar as it inscribes itself, so much has the person. Through such combinations of spiritual research as here, through clairvoyance, the deepest cultural possibilities can be considered. It would be impossible for culture to graft a completely alien culture onto an original one. Many believe that this is precisely how it should be expressed in the blood; but this is a mistake.

If, for example, we were to impose our modern culture on the Hindus, we would only wipe out their original culture. If we want to bring the culture of the higher peoples into the lower one, we must know the preconditions; with the ever-increasing racial mixing, the underlying conditions should be considered. It is the purpose of Theosophy to intervene here and to bring about the observance of a correct system. He who would lead men to higher culture must know how to approach the blood of men from without. He cannot bring culture to man unless his blood reacts. Thus the wisdom of the saying is expressed for all culture:

Blood is a very special fluid.

What did Mephistopheles have to do to get to the very depths of Faust? He had to get his blood. He wants to take possession of his blood because he knows what the old legends always emphasize:

If you have his blood, you have his self!

Spiritual research finds that the penetration of this saying shines through into the cultural stages of humanity.

The theosophical worldview is not just intended to satisfy theoretical needs, but what is called the theosophical worldview is conceived as something comprehensive and universal. Even though the Theosophical movement has gained few followers in the last 30 years, it may be said that there is a growing understanding that it is supposed to provide something that sheds light on all branches of spiritual life.

Today, an attempt will be made to show how the personality of Richard Wagner can be understood in a special way from the point of view of the Theosophical worldview.

Today, mysticism is usually understood by people as something that cannot be connected to a clear concept. It has been completely forgotten today that there was a time - the first centuries of the Christian era - when mysticism was called mathesis, because mysticism is said to be the clearest, most vivid, brightest form of knowledge and can only be compared to the clearest, most vivid form, mathematics.

Mysticism is to the supersensible world what mathematics is to the physical world. If one speaks of the way in which one can arrive at the study of the supersensible, one calls it mysticism; if one means more the study without the methods, one calls it theosophy. Theosophy is not meant to be the study of a divine or the study of a god. For the theosophist, the Divine is the all-embracing, underlying principle of the most insignificant and the most comprehensive phenomena in the world. If a person is still at an undeveloped stage, he will recognize only a little of the world; if he is more developed, he will recognize more. However, theosophy will never presume to say that man can recognize the nature of God. We can never speak of a complete knowledge of God; we must be clear that we live, weave and are in God. Knowledge is in the divine, but the divine can never be encompassed by knowledge.

In a Berlin lecture in 1811, Johann Gottlieb Fichte characterized what underlies philosophical endeavor as an attitude, as a view. He said to his audience: “In these lectures I have something very special to tell you, nothing about what the five senses say, what the mind combines. The supersensible objects go beyond sensory perception. A new sense is necessary for this. What matters is that one has the faith that one can gain knowledge of the supersensible world. If someone does not know this spiritual world, then he is like a blind man who can see nothing of color and light. Not in the sense that theosophy and mysticism speak of the supernatural as something outside our world, but in the sense that the blind man who is operated on sees the colors and the world of light, in the sense that man awakens the powers and abilities that are in his soul and lie dormant. It is possible to awaken what are called the spiritual eyes and spiritual ears. He is not immodest who says that one can know something, but he who claims that one cannot know anything. It is for the seeing person, not the blind, to decide about colors. It is for the spiritually seeing person to decide about the supersensible world.

There have always been people who were spiritually enlightened. They are called the initiated or the initiated. They were the missionaries for the world. All religions are based on the teachings of those who have looked into the spiritual worlds. The act of looking into the spiritual worlds is called mysticism or theosophy. There are ways to work out of the spiritual worlds without looking into them with one's own insight. Those who have looked into them without being able to describe the character of the same were the great artists. The great artists, such as Dante, Goethe and Richard Wagner, drew from the spiritual world.

It is not to be said that the ideas that Richard Wagner has drawn from the spiritual worlds would have been understood by him. This is not an objection to the truth of the matter. The plant is also unaware of the ideas that the botanist draws from it or that the poet has in mind. It is unaware of the ideas of the botanist and the poet, but it grows according to what the botanist subsequently thinks about it, it realizes these laws. Just as little as the plant, the poet needs to understand what he carries within him, which then makes him understandable. Just as it would be absurd to believe that a plant knows the laws by which it grows, it would be equally absurd to believe that Richard Wagner knew anything of what can be understood from him.

Richard Wagner was not just a poet and musician; he was the bearer of a new culture. He once said: All truly symphonic instrumental music is capable of making the laws and their interrelationships appear – sometimes the mind can be caught and cornered by the secrets that art reveals to us. – The musical instruments are the organs of nature itself. The artist does not merely depict reality, but truth.

At various times in his life, Richard Wagner searched very earnestly for a solution to the world's greatest problems. He wrote on his house:

This house shall be called Wahnfried,
because here my delusion found peace.

He really was a seeker. He sought throughout his entire life. In the mid-1840s, we find in Richard Wagner a purely Christian spirit, the kind of Christian worldview that has been propagated through the centuries. Then, in the 1840s, something took hold of him – it lasted until the 1850s – like a kind of atheism or materialism. During that period, strong, bold minds had come to realize that the same laws prevail up there in the world as in inorganic nature. This was a world view that the boldest minds of the time had developed. Richard Wagner was also more or less seized by it. But for him, material reality nevertheless took on an ethical or moral character. The true materialist believed that the world of the senses was the be-all and end-all. For Wagner, this belief was associated with a deep morality, like a great vision of the meaning of life. He said: “Man can only become selfless and loving when he says to himself, ‘It will all end with this existence’ — when he is capable of merging into the universe, of comprehending everything for the world, nothing for himself.” So he also wanted to ethically and morally transfigure materialism. But he soon came to a different view through Schopenhauer. Schopenhauer gave him something that was deeply satisfying to him as an artist and as a musician.

Schopenhauer stated that all other arts face the essence of the world much more alien than music. He gives music a very special position among the arts in general. Schopenhauer has basically taken the one guiding principle of his world view:

Life is an unfortunate thing, and I try to make it bearable by thinking about it.

Underlying everything is an unconscious, blind will. It forms the stone and then from the stone the plant and so ever higher forms, because it is always unsatisfied. In human life itself there are great differences. The “savage” living in dull consciousness feels the unsatisfaction of the will much less than the higher-standing man, who can feel the pain of existence much more clearly. Then Schopenhauer says: There is a second thing that man knows besides the will, and that is the idea. It is as if the waves of the sea ripple and reflect the forms of the will, the dark urge. In man, the will rises to the illusory image of the mirage. In it, man creates an image of what is outside of him. The idea is an illusion. Man suffers not only from the unsatisfied will, but also from the fact that he knows how to awaken the idea from the will. But there is a means by which man can come to a kind of release from the blind urge of the will. One means to this end is art. Through art, man is able to transport himself beyond what would otherwise arise from the will as dissatisfaction. When man creates a work of art, he creates out of imagination. While other imaginations are mere images, he looks at art as something different. The genuine artist does not create a copy of nature. When he creates works such as, for example, a Zeus, he has combined many impressions, retained all the merits in his memory and left out all the defects. From many people, he has formed an archetype that is not realized anywhere in nature, but is nevertheless distributed among many individual personalities.

According to Schopenhauer, a kind of essence confronts us in artistic works. By going to the depths of creative nature, as it were, man creates something that is reality. While other arts have to pass through the imagination, thus giving images of the will, for Schopenhauer, sound is an expression of the will itself. He hears the will of nature and reproduces it in tones.

Goethe sees intentions everywhere in nature. This is not a cliché, but rather the fact that Goethe was aware that nature only partially achieves its purpose in every being. There is much more to every being than it expresses. What does not come to light in it is released by the artist from nature; he creates something that goes beyond nature. When man, in creating after nature, creates a higher thing, he goes beyond nature. Goethe sees man as the highest link in the chain of development of beings.

When the healthy nature of man works as a whole, when he feels himself in the world as a great, beautiful, dignified and worthy whole, when the harmonious comfort gives him a pure, free delight: then the universe, if it could feel itself, would exult as it reached its goal and admire the summit of its own being and becoming. (On Winkelmann)

That which is elevated from nature to a work of art by man is such that in the work of art the divine foundation of nature shines towards man. The artist creates and the artistic is enjoyed by those who enjoy it in the Platonic ideas. The artists seek the common archetype of things. They create something higher than imagination, but live and work in the element of imagination. For Schopenhauer, music is something that sounds out of the essence of the world. The person who is artistically active in sound is, as it were, as if he were at the heart of nature with his ear; he perceives the will of nature and reproduces it in sounds. Thus, says Schopenhauer, man has an intimate relationship with the world, for he penetrates into the innermost essence of things. He had assigned music the role of directly representing the essence of the cosmos out of a kind of instinctive insight. He had a kind of instinctive idea of the real facts.

Schopenhauer's view was heartening for Richard Wagner. From this point of view he sought to establish his place in the world as a musician and as a poet. For him, music became a direct expression of the essence of the world.

Richard Wagner looked back to ancient Greece and said: In ancient Greek culture there was also an art. This art was not only music, not only poetry. In this primal art in Greece there was an interaction of dance, poetry and music. —- The movements in dance, those gestures in ancient dance, become for Wagner the expression of what can take place in the human soul. He imagined that the most intimate relationships between lovers, the most noble relationships, were expressed in gestures and movements. For Wagner, dance was originally a sensual reflection of the deepest experiences of love in the soul. What the poet spoke was only another expression of what is going on in the soul. The word is the other means of expression that must be added to the dance. The third means of expression is music. Richard Wagner looked at an original art that was neither music nor poetry nor dance in itself. He said to himself that originally all of humanity was more selfless; it was much more imbued with a sense of being absorbed in one another. Just as a finger, if it had consciousness, would have to feel itself as a limb of an organism, so the Greek citizen was a member of the whole state. Over the centuries, only egoism has emerged, that necessary egoism that has brought about independence. Its idea was that the future would necessarily bring about a reversal from egoism to love.

All people and all human achievements have also passed through the path of egoism. The arts used to belong together and only then separated. They must first come together again to form a whole.

Wagner saw Shakespeare as a role model as a poet and Beethoven as a musician. These were artists of whom he said: If you want to achieve something as an artist, you have to learn from them a musical and poetic creation. He saw in the earlier compositions that the libretto came between the feeling and the music; he wanted to change that. It was clear to him that music is connected to the human being. As an artist, he built on Shakespeare on the one hand and Beethoven on the other.

To understand this, we need to know what the mystical element is in the human being. He is a mystic who is able to see the spiritual in all the world, in all movement. It is possible for the human being to look at the whole cosmos in the same way as one looks at a single person, for example. Everything about a person becomes an expression of the soul within. Behind the veil of the physiognomy, one can see into every person. When the mystic looks at the plant and mineral world, he recognizes in every plant and every stone the expression of the common spirit of nature, one spirit in all entities. Some plants appear to him as the laughing expression of the rejoicing spirit of the earth, others as the tears that express the sorrow of the spirit of the earth. He really does see something moral in what the earth produces, the expression of a spiritual essence. Anyone who is able to live in the right way in the whole world, who feels that what is expressed in the world stands before man as uniformly as mathematics stand before him. The earth spirit of Faust was also a reality for Goethe. When we read the words:

Eminent spirit, thou gavest me, gave me all,
What I requested. Thou didst not in vain
Turn thy face to me in the fire.
Gavest me the glorious nature for a kingdom,
Strength to feel it, to enjoy it. Not
Coldly marveling visit thou only permit,
granting me to look into her deep breast,
as into the bosom of a friend.
You lead the line of the living
past me and teach me my brothers
in the silent bush, in air and water.
And when the storm roars and creaks in the forest,
the giant spruce toppling, crushing neighboring branches
And neighboring trunks squashing down,
And the hill muffled hollow thunders,
Then you lead me to the safe cave, show
Then myself, and my own chest
Secret deep wonders open up.

When we read these words of Goethe, we see how he realizes how man recognizes the divine-spiritual in nature and feels that it rises in his own heart.

In true mysticism, one is led to a real insight. When a person practices meditation and concentration, the time comes when he gains insight into the world of light and color in the astral realm. This world appears as if the colors were floating freely in space and became the expression of spiritual beings. Everything there is permeable, but we have light and we have colors, which are the expression of spiritual beings. The third world is the actual spiritual home of man. This is a world of spiritual sound, into which one soaks in such a way that everything around us appears as a world of flowing sounds.

We can distinguish three states of mind in today's man: first, everyday consciousness, waking consciousness; secondly, unconscious life in sleep; thirdly, in between, dream consciousness.

For the mystic, the awakened one, the soul is not merely there at night, but it is also aware then. It can then perceive a world of flowing tones at night. When he has reached this stage, he must make the transition from sleep consciousness to waking consciousness in such a way that he can also perceive the spiritual world in the waking state. When the practical mystic walks through streets and alleys, he sees not only the physical but also the spiritual everywhere. It is the world of Devachan in which the human being lives and moves during the entire state of sleep. There the soul lives in its true home, in a world of sound, in the world of the harmony of the spheres, the world that resounds and sings through him. For the mystically awakened, a sound becomes audible from the soul of all beings. Theosophy does not regard what the Pythagorean view of the world calls the harmony of the spheres as a dreamt-up construct, but as reality. When we hear music in the physical world of sounds, we are only hearing a shadow image of the spiritual world. The aesthetically appreciative person feels that music is akin to the home of the soul.

Richard Wagner said: If we want to express the soul of man, we can grasp a threefold way of expressing our inner being: in movement, in word and in music. Music is connected to the innermost core of the soul. Until now, music has only expressed the inner being of man, that which is hidden within him. But it is the greatest thing that this is transformed into action.

The symphony describes what a person can experience within themselves. But where the soul's experiences lead to action, where feelings lead to action, music has not been an appropriate expression of the soul. Only once has a symphony – Beethoven's Ninth – been able to express what lives within. There the composer gives in to the power that expresses the inner life in words. There the inner life pushes to become at least words, as an expression of the bubbling up of the inner life.

Shakespeare presents what a person can do when the soul itself has already come to terms with its inner being. The spoken drama has presented the external action, but has kept silent about what lives in the soul. Music has been the portrayal of what remains of the human being within the soul. Richard Wagner said: “Music must not merely compose the poetry, but must stand directly opposite the human being itself.” What overflows into action, he writes in words; what lives in the soul as the reason for action, that is expressed by music.

The mystic knows that man does not live here on earth merely as an individual personality, that the individual human being cannot be there without the other people either. The bond that connects them is spiritual. Those who look into the spiritual worlds can see how individual peoples are members of a whole natural organism. Just as a finger that has been cut off from a hand withers, so too is the individual human being, detached from the earthly organism, something that withers like a finger when separated from the organism.

The idea that one person can redeem another makes no sense if we do not take the mystical ideal into account; for example, we recognize a knowledge of this connection in Hartmann von der Aue's “Poor Henry”. Just as we can fill up the emptiness in a glass by pouring something into it from another vessel, just as we can let warmth flow over, so there is something in humanity that can be transferred from one person to another. All ideas of redemption are based on profound mysticism. Richard Wagner felt the spiritual in man, the ascent beyond man to the superman. In the superhuman figure, he shows how there is a connection within the whole human organism. Thus he brings redemption problems, for example, in the “Flying Dutchman”, where the Dutchman is redeemed by a sacrificing female being. - Tannhäuser is redeemed by Elisabeth.

In this way he weaves the fate of one human being into the fate of another. He shows this most magnificently in the 'Nibelungenring' and in 'Parsifal'. In the Nibelungenring we see how he presents the entire working of the world, how he points to an ancient human past, a humanity that has always been there. In the distant past, there was an ancient clairvoyance at the basis of all human development. Myths and legends arose out of ancient clairvoyance. There was once a clairvoyant consciousness that humanity will regain at a higher level. From the clairvoyant somnambulistic consciousness, humanity passes to the ordinary consciousness and then again to a consciousness where the human being still has the clairvoyant consciousness in addition to the ordinary consciousness. The whole transition from an originally less self-contained personality, which was still clairvoyant, to a sensual view, that is what the conquest of gold means: the conquest of sensual perception and human power. Love turns into selfishness; later it turns back into love. Those who want to bring out the ego must renounce love, and for that they acquire the gold. In his Ring of the Nibelung, Richard Wagner describes how the self develops, the selfish self, and how it emerges from the original state of clear-sightedness to become a loveless human being. As Alberich emerges, we feel the self arise. Richard Wagner wanted to depict the loveless ego in the pedal point in E-flat major in Das Rheingold, and in the subsequent chord we hear the wonderful way it comes to life.

We see how the gods emerge from a primordial consciousness, how it arises like a warning voice. It stands before Wotan in Erda. It stands there for humanity. Wotan calls upon her; he says:

You know
What the depths conceal,
What weaves through mountain and valley,
Air and water. Where there are beings
Your breath blows:
Where minds reflect
Your mind clings:
Everything, they say,
Is known to you.

Then Erda says:

My sleep is dreaming,
my dreaming is musing,
my musing is the rule of knowledge!

Brünhilde brings redemption through sacrifice. The idea of sacrifice, the idea of redemption carried out, is the most magnificent in Parsifal. It was on Good Friday 1857 in the Villa Wesendonck on Lake Zurich that Wagner looked out at the budding, burgeoning, blossoming nature. And in that moment, the connection between the burgeoning nature and the death of Christ on the cross became clear to him. This connection is the secret of the Holy Grail. From that moment on, the thought that he had to send the secret of the Holy Grail out into the world in musical form continued to permeate Richard Wagner's soul.

To understand these thoughts of Richard Wagner, we have to go back several hundred years in the development of mankind. At that time, there were also initiation sites in Europe. Through the wisdom that was imparted to man in the mysteries, he was brought into conscious contact with the gods. Such a person is called an initiate. Only the forms of such teachings change at different times. In the medieval mysteries of Europe, the secret that Richard Wagner sensed was brought to its highest development, namely, how nature's springtime blossoming is connected to the mystery of the cross. This was taught in a special way in the initiation schools of the Middle Ages, which are called Rosicrucian. We can best present this in the form of a conversation. Let us imagine the teacher saying something like the following to the student: Look at the plant, how it is rooted in the earth and holds its leaves and flowers towards the sun. In divine innocence and chastity, it holds its fruit organs towards the sun. And now look at people. Man is the reverse of the plant. He turns his head toward the sun, which corresponds to the root of the plant, and he turns the organs that the plant holds chastely toward the sun toward the earth. Through the soul of the disciple there had to pass the feeling of divine chastity as it is expressed in the plant. He was shown a future for humanity in which man, too, will become desireless and chaste. Then a spiritual chalice will open from above and look down upon man. And as now the sunbeam descends to the plant, so will man's purified power unite with the Divine Chalice. This inverted chalice, as it was presented to the disciple as a fact in the Mysteries, is the real ideal of the Holy Grail. The sunbeam is the holy lance of love.

You all know that the title of today's lecture, “Blood is a very special fluid,” is taken from Goethe's “Faust.” You know that Faust, the representative of striving humanity, is opposed by Mephistopheles, the emissary and prince of hell; he demands a contract from Faust in which Faust commits himself to the evil powers, and demands the signature in blood. Faust considers this a grotesque, a quirk, but Mephisto remarks: “Blood is a very special fluid.”

There are entire libraries explaining Faust, and this saying has also been explained in countless ways. One of the latter is the highly curious one from Professor Minor of Vienna, which goes: Mephisto, the emissary of hell, cannot stand blood, hates it, and that is why he demands a signature in blood. There may be some erudition in the explanation, but there is no reason in it. Mephistopheles would not demand a signature in a substance he hates. On the contrary, Mephistopheles places particular value on blood. This material has already undergone a long development of legends. In the sixteenth [seventeenth] century we already find in the Pfitzer's Faustbuch that Faust signs over himself to the devil with blood, and in older versions of this legend it is described exactly how the vein on the left hand is opened, the blood runs out, coagulates and in coagulating forms the letters: “Oh man, flee!”

Blood also appears in other legends and always has a special meaning. In these legends in particular, we see events that were significant for the last few centuries. Fairytales and myths all have a theosophical basis, and anyone who engages with theosophical wisdom can see that they contain figurative expressions for spiritual and profound truths. The legend of Faust is one such expression, and in particular this expression, in which Goethe used theosophical wisdom as a basis.

We want to point out the whole significance of blood in the world and in humanity, and we will see that the saying is to be taken literally. If we try to get it out of our minds, we say: It will get ahold of Faust especially when it has his blood in its name.

Theosophy wants to point to the near future, how to colonize, how humanity should mix. To understand what blood means, it must be explained from the point of view of theosophy.

To find access, one must place the old sentence at the top, the Hermetic principle: As above, so below; and vice versa.

At first incomprehensible, it contains a whole world view. All who have this guiding principle say: All that is material is the expression of a spiritual substance.

To those who look more deeply, it presents itself as ice and water.

If someone tells you: Ice is not water, you say that they just don't know the context.

Just as ice is nothing but condensed water, matter is nothing but condensed spirit.

The world is a great spiritual organism, and everything in it is a part of it.

The world is a great spiritual organism, and everything in it is a part of it.

The world is a great spiritual organism, and everything in it is a part of it.

The world is a great spiritual organism, and everything in it is a If someone says to you: Ice is not water, you can say that he does not know the context. Just as ice is nothing other than condensed water, so matter is nothing other than condensed spirit. In all material things we can find the underlying spirit. The true spiritual researcher calls spirit the upper part, the material, so to speak, the physiognomic expression, the lower part. When you look at a face, you can tell from the expression what is going on in the soul behind it, whether it is joy or sadness. To the true spiritual researcher, everything in the world, all of nature, is an expression of the spirit. For example, to the researcher, one flower is the expression of the joy of the earth spirit, another of pain.

In this way, the spirit expresses itself in everything. There is no matter that does not express spirit, and no spirit that is not expressed somewhere in matter. One understands why a face smiles, why it cries, when one knows the underlying pain and joy; one understands the lower when one knows the upper. Thus we will understand what corresponds to blood in the spiritual when we understand what blood means in the world.

To do this, we have to consider the fourfold nature of the human being. To the spiritual seer, the physical body is only one part of the human being. It consists of the same substances as nature outside. Only its juices can move, grow, digest, reproduce, the substance cannot do this by itself; for this it needs the etheric body, which it shares with plants. The third link, the astral body, the carrier of pain, joy, pleasure, displeasure, passions and base representations, is not present in plants, but in humans and animals. The fourth link, whereby humans become the crown of creation, is their ability to say “I” to themselves. This is what underlies all religions. In the ego, God speaks to the human soul, and a shiver went through the line of Jews in the temple when the priest pronounced the name of the ineffable God, “Yahweh”.

The higher limbs that make up the spiritual structure of the human being need not concern us today. You know that we can only perceive the sensual body sensually, and the other supersensible parts are therefore called the upper limbs. And each of these upper members has an instrument in the physical body, the parts of which are all of different kinds and not of equal significance. We shall understand this connection if we imagine that the physical body contains the same substances as the inanimate products of the external world. Think of a crystal. It is just a stone, but if you look at it more closely, you say to yourself: This stone could not be like this if everything in the world were not as it is. Each individual thing is a mirror of the whole. It takes on this form through the forces of the outside world and could not exist in this way on another star with different forces.

The brilliant Frenchman Cuvier says: Give me a human bone, and I will determine the entire figure from it. For the whole figure determines the individual bone. It is the same with the earth. Likewise, with only a physical body, man would be a mirror of the universe, but without consciousness; he could not express anything in it.

Now, however, we are not just looking at the physical being, but at the being that lives. You cannot find anything that does not grow and move its juices in a certain way, individualizes. You see growth, reproduction and so on in the plant as a physiognomic expression for the etheric body, so that two parts exist, firstly, in which there are only chemical processes, and secondly, the activity of the etheric body, which brings movement.

Now let us move on to the animal. It not only sets matter in motion, but is also able to reflect joy and suffering within itself. When a plant rolls up its leaves when touched, it is reacting to a stimulus, not sensing; it only becomes sentient when the external process is followed by an internal one. This requires a nervous system; this is provided by the astral body, so that when you have a human being in front of you, you can say: First of all, the human being has what only the physical part works on; these are the sense organs; they are lived through by the etheric body, but are not built by it. Its actual tool is growth, and so on. The astral body's tool is the nervous system, from the solar plexus to the finest nerves of the spine.

A being that has a nervous system will indeed reflect the outside world within itself, but without the fourth link it will never know the expression for its ego. It finds its tool in the blood. The fact that a being has blood enables it to feel joy and suffering from its innermost individuality, its very own being. I must first relate the ideas to myself in my blood, then the pain becomes my pain, the joy my joy. Hence the connection between inner processes and the bloodstream. Blushing and turning pale are a matter of the soul.

We speak of consanguinity. The name is not quite right. The recently told story of Anzengruber and Rosegger illustrates what underlies it. Anzengruber had farmers for ancestors, which is why he can describe them. As figurative as this may seem, it is still the actual truth. Blood itself is not inherited; it is always newly formed. Blood and all its organs are the last to form in the animal and human germ. What is inherited is what lies behind the blood, the shape and structure of, for example, the nose, the brain and so on. We connect what we have inherited with our innermost selves by letting it affect our blood; in this way it becomes our property. Thus the blood pulses through entire generations, although it is always new blood.

Certain things in the Bible are impossible to understand without understanding the meaning of blood. Right at the beginning of the Old Testament, you find that Adam, Abraham and so on live to be 800, 900 years old. At that time, there was a different way of naming, a different meaning of the word.

I must mention a fact here that was an important event in the development of humanity: the transition from close marriage to distant marriage. In all peoples, there comes a time when this ancient law is broken. When this happens, something always takes place in spiritual development. In the case of close marriage, the ancestors lived on in memory to a much greater extent. Everyone retained the memory of what had been done generations before. The moment that distant marriage occurs, memory is limited to the time between birth and death. In the past, you would find a great cult of ancestors for a tribal leader, to whom the whole tribe can be traced back. As long as blood comes to blood, the individual remembers, and so long the same name remains. As long as the memory of Adam lasts, his name remains. So you see that blood is like a tablet; what is inherited is the inner structure of the body, which is written into the blood. The same ego remains wherever the same is written into the blood.

We have the group soul and also speak of such a thing in animals. Therefore, we do not refer to the individual lion as an ego; and the further we go back in man, the more we come across the group soul.

It is only through long-distance marriage that the individual ego develops. The more distant the people who mix are from each other, the more the old view is killed and the outside world flows in; the earlier sense of identity with one's ancestors is pushed into the background. The more that flows in from the outside, the more the differences of personality develop; because the outside world is different everywhere. You can see that, for example, in different countries.

What primarily determines a person must have an effect on his blood. What you say to a person will only make an impression if his blood is stirred. You must not have access to his intellect or to his nervous system; you must make his blood pulsate, then you will touch his I, for the blood is precisely its instrument.

All ancient schooling consists not in theory but in influencing the I itself. Faust is to be understood in this way. At the moment when one takes possession of the blood of a being, one forms a bond with that being. He who wishes to assert his power in an unauthorized way does this; he who wishes to gain influence over a being in the good sense may only do so much that this being retains its independence at every moment — may not give him anything that the other is not willing to accept.

It is clear that where one wants to plant and foster a spiritual life, one must act on the blood.

In terms of colonization, cultures can only develop where the blood mixing of the peoples allows a good tone together. Where this is not the case, where the blood mixing does not go together, the culture that is already present will be destroyed. Those who look into this will see that the introduction of European culture into distant countries often appears to be an illusion and a deception. In the future, a culture will come that will ask about this law. Then colonization will no longer be based on blind chance, but on the theosophical significance for indirect life.

So you see that Mephistopheles really gets Faust under his control through the blood, and that the desire for the signature in blood is not a quirk or a grimace.

You know that the saying that is to be the leitmotif of our lecture, “Blood is [a very special fluid],” is found in Goethe's “Faust.” Mephistopheles, the emissary of hell, and thus of evil, demands that Faust sign the contract he is concluding with him in blood. The point is that Faust, whom Goethe presents as a representative of striving humanity, is placed between good and evil, that Faust is to be served by the servant of hell and that Mephistopheles is to accompany Faust throughout his life and Faust in return surrenders himself to him. This contract should be signed in blood, as Mephistopheles demands. Now you know the answer to Faust's remark as to whether such a form, and especially blood, is required: “And blood is a very special fluid.”

There is a whole literature about Faust, but very few people know the meaning of the word “Mephistopheles”: the liar, the corrupter – from the Hebrew =; much less [do they] know the meaning of the blood. In one of the last commentaries on Faust, you can read that one has to understand the saying of Mephistopheles in this way: Mephistopheles demands the blood and remarks ironically: “Blood is a very special fluid” because he hates the blood, because it is particularly unpleasant for him, so he demands the signature in blood. You really have to be a “Goethe explainer” to be able to make such a statement. Can you in your right mind demand something as a special prize because it is the most unpleasant thing to you? You don't do that; when you demand something, as strictly as Mephisto does, with the signature, you are designating this something as something valuable. Common sense simply dictates that the emissary of hell places a very special value on blood. Hence the signature in blood.

We can trace the legend on which Goethe based his poem back to the sixteenth century. Even then, we find the signature in blood, and it is still vividly depicted. How Faust's vein is opened, how the blood trickles out, how it then coagulates, how the sign finally appears: O man, cleanse thyself!

The Faust saga is in turn only one of the many sagas in which blood and blood oaths play a role. The blood oath did not come into the Faust saga by mere happenstance, but through that through which we find a deep wisdom expressed in so many sagas and myths. How mysterious a fact often appears! But the spiritual researcher knows that when we explore the old legends and fairy tales, not in the way of today's materialistic scholars who speak of a poetic folk fantasy that the connoisseur of the people certainly has never found them anywhere, and who speak of fantastic creations – if we observe not in this way, but as spiritual researchers, we find profound spiritual truths expressed in them everywhere, figurative expressions for profound spiritual truths. It is most remarkable that when we look at simple expressions of the people, we have before us great spiritual truths, presented in images. These are fairy tales, myths, legends! And we can always ask ourselves: is there perhaps a deep spiritual truth contained in this folk tale, perhaps in this one saying? And then, as spiritual scientists, we want to examine this saying.

Today, we will deal with the significance of blood, the significance of this particular fluid, in the life of the individual as well as in the life of humanity and nations. By illuminating the mystery of blood, we will shed some light on important cultural issues of the present.

We will understand what we have to say about it if we keep to an ancient saying, a saying that is called the Hermetic Principle. It comes from one of the greatest initiates, Hermes Trismegistus, the Egyptian initiate. Many scholars consider him to be a fabulous personality. However, spiritual science knows that he was the greatest teacher of Egyptian culture. This sentence may at first seem strange, it reads: “Everything above is as it is below, everything below is as it is above.”

What does this mean? You will understand when you consider the following: You see a smiling expression on a person's face; it is immediately clear to you that serenity is present in that person's soul. You see a tear, and it is clear to you that sadness or pain has settled on this person's soul. You draw conclusions about the inner being from what the eyes see on the outside, and about the material from the spiritual. Now, in the sense of the philosophy of Hermes Trismegistus, the material is called the lower, and the spiritual-soul is called the upper. And anyone who is familiar with this philosophy is aware that there is a spiritual world and that everything that takes place in this spiritual world can find expression in the material world. This philosophy tells us that at some point every spiritual reality finds material expression. There is no spiritual reality that does not express itself in the material world, and no material reality that does not have a spiritual side. Everything down in the material as well as up in the spiritual.

In medieval philosophy of that great, wonderful brotherhood, which is called the brotherhood of the Holy Grail, you could have been an invisible spectator between the teacher and students of the Holy Grail covenant and overhear a long-lasting teaching scene. I cannot sketch this in any other way than in the form of a conversation. It did not take place like this, but you will get an idea of what happened between teacher and student.

It was made clear to the student: just as you can tell a person's soul and their cheerfulness by a laughing expression on a face, and their sadness by a tear, you can do the same in all of nature. For such a student, what Goethe characterizes as the earth spirit was not just a poetic image, but reality. Just as every human being, when he sees his fellow human beings laughing or sad-faced before him, says to himself: Here I have not only flesh and blood, but a soul, so the medieval Grail disciple had been brought to say to himself: When I look at this earth with its stones, plants, animals, people and everything else, , it is, like the human body, the expression of a soul or spirit; and it was made quite clear to him: If your finger were to imagine itself to be an independent entity without your soul, you could easily convince yourself that this is not the case by cutting it off from your body. It would wither away in no time. It cannot live an independent life. Nor can you, who belong to the earth soul. If you could separate yourself from it, you would wither like the finger if you were to move only a few miles away from the earth. The finger does not indulge in the foolish illusion of being an independent entity because it has grown; if it could walk around like a person, it would do so.

Thus the saying became a deep truth for the pupil, and the earth spirit a real being. And when he walked across the fields, a realization shone in him, going deep to his heart. When he saw one plant with a laughing face, it was the expression of the cheerful earth spirit, and when he saw another with dark purple flowers, it was the expression of the grieving earth spirit; the whole earth became the expression of a spirit, as did the seemingly dead stone.

When the student then went on to the so-called Rosicrucian school, which was founded in the fourteenth century, the teaching continued with the following: Look at the stone, this crystal! It consists of a certain substance. Compare this substance with animal and human substance. This is permeated by instincts and desires, by cravings and wishes; but desireless, without desire - only of glass - illuminated by the light, the stone substance stands there; chaste in the face of animal and human substance. - And so the disciple had to delve deeper into the chaste stone. As a lofty ideal, the goal was before his eyes, to become as pure as the stone in its kind. The disciple had to feel this way about the chaste stone.

I may only tell you the first sentence of a very solemn formula that was spoken every time there was an important section in the teaching, the formula that indicates the passage of divine wisdom through all nature. Where world wisdom works down in the realm of stones, it is characterized in the formula: The stones are mute. I have placed and hidden the eternal creative Word in them, and chaste and modest, they bear it in the depths.

And another scene that took place within the Grail Schools was this: one pointed to the plant calyx, which stands out from the plant, and said: “Behold the plant! It stretches its roots into the earth and its organs of fertilization towards the sun, those organs that appear here in chaste purity and are kissed by the sunbeam, which is called the holy lance of light. And this plant chalice contains the same reproductive organs that must be covered by the sense of shame in the human realm. Man is the completely inverted plant. The roots are the head of the plant. We have to imagine that, through the absorption of desires and instincts, the human being has to shamefully conceal what the plant holds up to the sun as a chaste chalice. A development takes place from plant to human being. Imagine the plant indicated by a downward stroke, the animal makes half the turn, the human being the whole. This is drawn: a cross is created. Plato expressed it thus: the world soul is crucified on the cross of the cosmic body. — For the three kingdoms were felt in spiritual science as the cross, and as the world soul passes from the plant to man, it passes through the cross.

And now the disciple was told: Imagine this development, imagine the chaste chalice of the plant as a model for the human power of procreation, and this purified from all desire; imagine man as a creative being, as pure and chaste as the calyx of the plant, then the chalice appears to man as the spiritual organ of production of the future, kissed by the sun of spiritual life. This ideal is called the Holy Grail. - So the spiritual content of the Holy Grail was distributed to the students.

Those who walk through nature as scientists see in the chalice a deep reference to what man should become. The lower, matter, expresses the spirit, the upper, everywhere.

And we learn to understand the lower when we get to know the upper. We understand the matter of blood when we get to know the upper that corresponds to it. Our task is first to look at the human being spiritually and then to see what corresponds to the blood in the spiritual.

We no longer need to get to know the nature of the human being in detail in the spiritual. Four members: physical, etheric, astral body and I, through which the human being has become the crown of creation. The I is that which sensitive natures always feel as the expression of the actual and eternal in man. And you need only make a very small effort to consider what this name 'I' means in contrast to all other names. Anyone can call a chair a chair; but this cannot be done with the name 'I'. No one can say 'I' to me, the name 'I' can never approach us from the outside if it is to mean anything to us. The soul must begin to speak from within. With the I, we express something that gives itself its name. The true religions have always felt this. For example, the ancient Hebrew secret science called this divine the God himself, and the name for it the unspeakable name of God. “I am, who am” means nothing other than this “I am” in the soul. And that is what those who heard it, the listeners felt: the resounding of the spiritual in the soul when it was spoken: “Jav” = “I am who I am”; that is the unspeakable name of God.

The I is therefore the highest of the four members of man. Of these four members, you can only see and touch the physical body here, et cetera. The other three members are the upper part of man; but to every upper part there corresponds a lower. Each of these three members is built up in the physical body by special organs. The physical body, of which the ordinary materialistic anatomist knows something, is also a many-membered being. Its organs are not all the same; man has four kinds of organs: those that are purely physical, built only by the physical body itself; then those that he could not have developed without the etheric body, without the astral body, without the ego. Certain organs are the lower part of the etheric body, certain the lower part of the astral body, and certain the physical expression, the lower part of the ego.

At the same time, you must not believe that physical organs, which are only composed of the physical, can also be in a purely physical body; all are permeated by the etheric and astral bodies; but these first ones take their form only from the physical body. The ear and the eye are physical apparatuses. In his senses, the human being is an expression of the physical body. Now go from these senses to the organs of nutrition, reproduction and growth: these are no longer mere physical apparatuses, they are structured and are the lower part of the etheric body. You have to imagine that the human body, in its sense organs and its skeleton, is built by the physical principle itself. The fact that it is permeated by the etheric body means that the others are incorporated into it. The plant is also permeated by an etheric body, which is why it also incorporates the organs of nutrition, growth and reproduction. The moment a being is also permeated by an astral body, a nervous system is incorporated into that being. This is the expression of the astral body.

As man gradually developed as a material being, he passed through the various kingdoms of nature; he has found his way from the mere physical body up to the higher ones, and the higher members of his being have incorporated more and more organs from the lower ones. The organs are not of equal value. The nerves are the expression of the astral body, the stomach and liver those of the life body; they find, as it were, their outer physiognomy in the lower for the upper.

The matter can be explained in even more detail: the astral body has developed slowly; it consists of different members, first of all the so-called sentient body, the lowest member, then the sentient soul, then the intellectual soul, and finally the consciousness soul. They have developed little by little. If you want to understand this gradual development of man, you have to start again at the bottom. Look at a physical being! Great philosophers call this a mirror of the entire world system. Why? Look at the smallest stone, consider that it could not be as it is if the whole environment were not as it is. The great naturalist Cuvier said: If you show a very wise anatomist a single bone, he would be able to see from its structure what the structure of the whole animal to which it belongs should be; if the bone were a little different, the whole structure would have to be different. The whole is expressed in the individual; this applies to the whole cosmos.

Just as a single bone must be as it is because the whole is as it is, and would be different if the whole were different, so a very wise being could tell from the smallest stone how the whole planet is formed. The individual is a mirror of the cosmos.

But if we ascend from the mere lifeless mirror of the cosmos, as it already shows itself in the stone, this cosmic reflection appears to us in a higher form when we see it where there is life underlying the beings. There the cosmos is not reflected as it is in the stone; there the process of reflection continues within. The being closes itself off from the outside. Processes within are stimulated because certain processes are taking place outside. In its movements, the plant reflects what is happening outside.

In the nervous system, the reflection is even more complete. The simplest nervous system is the one that still exists in humans as the sympathetic nervous system, which spreads out in two strands on either side of the spinal cord and whose activity our consciousness is unaware of. This nervous system, as the lowest nervous system, is the lower one for the sentient body. Now you can see, as is shown in my Theosophy, how the sentient soul integrates itself into the sentient body. There is an expression of this in the lower part: the spinal cord nerve strand integrates itself between the two ganglion strands. Everything below is like everything above!

The material world is a wonderful expression of spiritual life. Theosophy will offer you a spiritual image of the world. This has the seal imprint outside. And this is the meaning of the word seal. In the language of revelations, St. John calls it “sealed” where we have something material in front of us and we do not yet know the spiritual aspect of it. And our world will become apparent with its seven secrets. The whole world is sevenfold: seven colors, seven tones, seven limbs of the human being. There is nothing miraculous about this, only the same basic law. This sevenfold universe is, as far as it is not revealed, a book with seven seals. When it is unsealed, one will recognize the upper part for the lower.

For the mind soul, which is a higher link in the astral body, the brain is the outer expression, the lower.

Now the question arises: if the physical body is, so to speak, its own physical expression, everything that belongs to the nutritional and et cetera system, the expression of the ether body, if the nervous system is that of the astral body, what then is the expression of the eternal?

That is the blood and the blood system. Wherever blood appears, it is an expression of an ego.

In this way, we will understand in a spiritual-scientific way why, for example, in the human being, when the germ develops, the heart and blood come only after all the organs have been formed in the womb. This corresponds entirely to what takes place in the spirit. The I is the crown of everything and also appears last.

There is also a wonderful connection between blood and the I. You may be able to get an idea of how blood is connected to the I, to the very essence of the human personality, if you consider the following: where the I is afraid, where it is horrified, its physical body turns pale; where it wants to hide, the blood appears in the form of a blush. Wherever the ego is particularly engaged, we see external expression in the discoloration of the face. This is trivial, but it gives us an idea of the connection between the ego and the blood.

You see, our materialistic science regards the heart as a kind of pumping station. It is of the opinion that the heart pumps blood through the body, quite mechanically. Hegel was the only German philosopher of the nineteenth century to know that this is not the case. He said: it is not the heart that drives the blood, but the blood that gives the heart its movement. And the blood gets its movement from the soul, is driven by the spirit. The heart beats faster when the spiritual impulse is there. The blood is the driving element of the heart.

It was a bold statement, but it is common knowledge in spiritual science. It has never said anything other than this: that it is the soul itself, under the impulse of the ego, that causes the blood to flow either under a sense of terror or under some other feeling that belongs to the soul, that this soul, this ego, drives the blood and thereby the heart.

And at the same time, this will draw your attention to something in spiritual science that will make one thing clear to you. Namely, the heart is something that thwarts today's material science. The voluntary muscles are so-called striated muscles, all involuntary muscles are so-called muscles with smooth muscle fibers. The heart is now an involuntary muscle; most people cannot control it. And yet it is striated; where does that come from? Spiritual science explains it thus: the heart as it is today is at the beginning of its development; there will come a time when what is still an involuntary movement today will become an involuntary one, subordinate to its spirit. The brain is the thinking organ of today and the heart will become the spiritual organ of the future. In the future, the heart will occupy a completely different position. Man will consciously make his blood circulate through his body. The heart will be the expression of his spiritual life, a consciously working muscle. In the future it will be so. That is why it is already present in the germ. Thus we have these very different organs of man, blood and heart, as the expression of the I and can follow it in its significance for the world.

We speak of blood relationship, of the importance of blood. We sense this, but we have no real insight into it. I will present such intuitions from life: Anzengruber and Rosegger, who are both known for their depictions of rural life – the latter describes them as he sees them, but the former very aptly describes them entirely from his own perspective, without having observed and studied them more closely – had a conversation in which Rosegger said to Anzengruber: You live and have lived entirely in the city, and yet you have characterized the farmers so admirably. If you were to go out to them and take a good look at them, you would be able to describe them perfectly. That would just drive me crazy, Anzengruber replied. I have lived in the city all my life, but my ancestors were farmers, all farmers, it's in my blood.

It is in the blood – that could seem like a picture; but is it a mere picture? Anzengruber really did describe from his blood. He didn't have a notebook. Why? Not because blood is inherited, it cannot be inherited. Not a single drop of blood passes from father to son. It is even the latest thing to arise in the germ. But just as you inherit your father's nose, the structure of external organs, you also inherit the structure of your nervous system, the structure of your internal organs. Everything that is the expression of the physical body, the etheric and astral body, you inherit from your ancestors. You could just as easily examine the similarity of your stomach to that of your father as you could your nose. And you could examine the similarity of the Anzengruber brain to that of his peasant ancestors, like the nose. The limbs of the human being that prove to be similar to the ancestral forms express themselves in the blood as in a tablet, because the blood represents the I. What makes an impression on the blood makes an impression on the I. If I live entirely as a son of my ancestors, and what has been inherited is the strongest in me, then what has been inherited is imprinted in the blood, and I feel in the blood what was still present in my ancestors. If the impressions of the outer world are stronger, then what has entered my ego, my blood, drowns out what flows from within. I forget what the ancestors have allowed to flow in.

Thus, the one of whom it is said that he has “race” will truly be a son of his family, have the structure of his ancestors. He imprints this in his blood, his I. The one in whom the race is no longer so strong is dependent on external impressions. Everyone has these impressions, whether they are the son of this or that father. They have drowned out their inner impulses when faced with stronger external impressions. If the impressions of the outside world are stronger, then he has its blood, if race lives in him, then race has his blood. What the ancestor has experienced is then expressed in what he does and writes.

Expand this and consider the spiritual origin of man. Imagine: Even more is expressed by what is inherited. Imagine that; it really happened.

If we go back to ancient times, we find a certain starting point in every people. Very different marriage relationships, relationships of love and belonging and kinship prevailed then; within the family, the tribe, the individuals married. In every nation, you will find the transition from what can be called close marriage to what is called distant marriage. In the time of the former, it would have broken the custom, the law of a tribe, if a male or female member had married outside it. In every nation, however, we see how close marriage is later broken, how individuals married into other tribes. And everywhere this transition from close marriage, where blood relatives marry, to distant marriage, where those who are distant unite, is linked to a change in spiritual life.

The legends of the peoples have preserved this transition from close to distant marriage in a special, unique way. There are many legends in which women are abducted and taken to foreign tribes. Something tragic in the transition from the old order to the new is expressed in them. The transition to distant marriage is linked to a transition from an ancient clairvoyance to a modern one, more dependent on the observation of the external world of the senses. Where close marriage is common practice, people still have something like a natural clairvoyance. This is lost when foreign blood is mixed with the close blood. What Anzengruber felt in his blood was also felt by those who were in close marriage, but to a much greater degree. They did not feel what their ancestors had experienced as darkly, as half unconsciously as Anzengruber, but as something they had experienced themselves. Through the close relationship, the inherited structure was so strong that it was imprinted in the blood. Thus the ego, the blood, the whole family felt, not just itself. Only when foreign blood was added did the power of generation cease, did the old cult of ancestors lose itself. Where a distant ancestor was honored, it was not the product of the imagination, but rather the feeling that the most distant descendant felt connected to the ancestors in his blood, in his ego. Clairvoyance was there. All legends, which are like images of truths, become understandable to us when we know that they arose out of other perceptions, out of clairvoyance, which can still be found today in primitive, natural peoples.

You need to know this if you want to understand the writings that are based on spiritual science. One writing belongs here above all: the Bible. You cannot understand the most important parts of it in today's times. It is impossible if one does not know one thing: that in ancient times a name did not refer to what was represented in a personality, but to what lived on in the blood of a distant relative for entire generations. Because the inherited structure was expressed in the blood of the most distant descendant, one felt all of this in one's self. It did not yet work as it did with the Anzengruber, but rather like a true memory. The person in whom all the blood had merged with another through the distant marriage remembers only his own life, while the person from the close marriage remembers everything that the ancestors have experienced. They, the ones from the close marriage, referred to it as belonging to their ego. Through generations the same name resounded, because the experiences of the ancestor were recalled. Thus Adam was not the name of an individual man, but of a continuous memory through generations.

Let the Bible describe the original ages; it knows that the names were given in that way. A wonderful light falls on those ancient reports. They are correct as soon as one knows that their names belong to the time when the same structure was expressed in the blood over and over again.

And then we find everywhere, where the transition from the near to the distant marriage takes place, how that ancient clairvoyant memory is killed. Today you can find everywhere the very first elementary truths, which are thousands of years old in occultism. You can find the sentence presented: The more closely related the blood relationship is, the more vivid the power of vision is. The mixing of blood had an extinguishing effect on the life of the spiritual body. Today, researchers are trying to see if the blood of different animals can be mixed. The blood of mice does not kill rats, that of rabbits does not kill hares, because these animals are closely related. Blood from more distantly related animals kills them. Distant blood really does kill here. It was different with humans. Distant blood did not have an extinguishing effect on the physical body, but on the spiritual body, which was the carrier of that higher wisdom.

This shows us the function of blood. We see that the one who has the blood has the I. Where the outside world has gained greater power because foreign blood has been added, there the external experiences have taken effect and these have the blood. Whoever has the blood of a being has the being's I.

Not everything is the same for all time. When close marriage existed, conditions on earth were different. This does not apply to the new era; because conditions on earth have changed, the I had to move into distant marriage. The old aristocratic families have retained the old ways, and this has adverse consequences today. What in ancient times was the bearer of high spiritual human development must have a harmful effect in materialistic times.

In the future, humanity will rise again to higher levels of consciousness, but in a different way, in that the individual will take possession of spiritual rebirth; he will become so strong that he himself as a person will be able to imprint the spirit in his blood, gaining power over his blood. Then man will become clairvoyant again, so that he will not merely conquer abstract knowledge, but will be able to transfer this knowledge into his blood. Try to acquire as much theoretical knowledge as you want, it remains dry and abstract, sober and bare; try to develop knowledge in such a way that concepts become feelings for you, higher affects, touch your blood, then it becomes higher knowledge. Hence that medieval schooling that led the student across the fields, that let the flowers speak to his blood, and not just to his cool mind.

This is how things are connected. It is necessary to research the function of blood. Just as blood is the creator of what holds the ego together, so if we bring spiritual life to the blood from the outside and it does not match the blood, the spiritual life cannot be understood by the blood. Therefore, the European cannot simply impose his culture on a “savage” tribe. They can preach as much as they like, but they will not achieve their purpose and will only destroy it. This is how the Spanish destroyed the Indians: the blood differences were too great. The Indians had very different blood from the Europeans.

Thus you will see that the spiritual intercourse between nations must be consciously regulated. One must pay attention to the mission of the blood, the blood question is related to the colonial question. Here again one can see how practical Theosophy is. The time will come when we will have to consciously guide what we call cultural mixtures. We must not overlook the fact that only the upper part can penetrate into the lower part, where it can truly find expression.

Study the conditions of your blood, for then you will get to know the conditions of your various selves.

When you speak to a person in everyday life, you speak to them in terms of abstract, bare, and dull concepts! The other person can learn a lot from you, but everything they can learn remains in a certain shadowy conceptual state. If you speak to them about something that touches their heart and makes their blood boil, then you will not only have their mind, but also their soul, and you will have them inside you. Whoever has a man's blood has his soul. Whoever has a nation's blood – not in a materialistic sense, but as an expression of the soul – has the nation, and whoever wants to have a nation, to teach it, must understand the soul and the expression of the soul in blood. Whether for good or evil, if you want to take possession of a human soul, you must take possession of the blood.

Thus the folk tales have spoken wisdom here, by emphasizing the blood oath, to indicate that a person gives himself completely. There is profound wisdom in the legend that lets the devil win Faust, his entire self, by obtaining the signature in blood. Once Mephistopheles has the blood of Faust, he has his ego. That is why he did not mean it mockingly, but it is truth and really the expression of deep wisdom; yes, it is precisely the deepest wisdom about the nature of man in the sense that the lower is the expression of the upper, it confirms this sentence to us: And blood, yes, blood is a very special fluid.

The riddle of our existence is as old as thinking humanity itself, and not only has it been posed at all times, but also among all peoples. But there are also moments in every single human life when we look up to something higher, something mysterious. In particular, one big question is posed again and again by thinking humanity, namely, the question of the meaning and significance of our existence. In fact, one could say that all other riddles ultimately boil down to this one question about the meaning of the universe. And deep down inside every single person lies the emotional desire to receive an answer to this question. But it is not only our ignorance of such lofty things as the movement of the stars or the origin of our existence that drives us to ask questions; often, more mundane things do so to an even greater extent; indeed, there are times in life when everything becomes a mystery , why we are afflicted with sorrow and pain, why we are born into a lower class, while others are born into the most favorable conditions of life, why we suffer while others do not, although we lead a seemingly blameless life. Yes, it is especially difficult for us to understand that we are deprived of the necessities of life, although our fellow human beings have seemingly entered into existence with just as few merits and are now richly blessed with the most diverse goods.

In addition to the big existential questions, however, there are still questions in life, the solutions to which should not only satisfy our minds and ingenuity, but should also pour into our hearts like comfort and reassurance, filling our souls with a harmonious mood that truly understands life. Of course, not only the mind should have a say in the objective solution of the existential questions. For according to the monistic world view, which assumes that both spirit and mind flow from the same source of existence, both also demand consideration.

There have always been great epochs in the development of mankind when the attempts to solve the questions of existence have brought peace to troubled souls. Religions, in their own way, provide such solutions to the big questions; but they mainly take into account only one side of the human being, that is, they satisfy more only the mind, but not the reasoning intellect as well.

For some time now, something has been emerging in our culture that seems like a conflict between those religious solutions that were sacred to many people and meant truth to them, and what science teaches.

Even children are confronted with such questions in a worrying way. They are introduced to the teachings of the origin and destiny of man in great religious images, but at the same time they also absorb the teachings of popular science, they hear about the development of man and all living things through purely natural forces.

The consequences that arise for a young soul can be of two kinds: either such a person becomes dulled to all higher things, enthusiasm for the questions of the meaning of life and existence fades away, or he takes the side of science and deliberately begins to trample on religious truths from his supposedly superior point of view.

There have been many attempts to resolve this conflict. Almost every day brings us new evidence of how people here and there are striving to shed light on the riddles of existence, even if these personal attempts do not directly promote scientific insight.

But another attempt at a solution has been gaining ground with ever greater force in recent decades. Although it has crept quietly and modestly into our culture, it has already brought peace and quiet to thousands upon thousands of minds. What distinguishes this approach from all others is that it does not apply only to the narrow confines of a single nation, but rather its followers are scattered across the globe, belonging to the most diverse nations and religions.

This attempt to solve the riddle of existence has been made by spiritual science. It tells us: Man perceives the world of the senses around us, but that is not all, as material science believes, for which everything that lies beyond sensory perception is transcendental.

For spiritual science, the human being is a creature in the process of development. The word development seems so familiar to us; how could it not, being the magic word of a large range of recent scientific fields. However, spiritual science takes this word in a different sense than natural science does.

If our senses have limits to our knowledge, it is because we have developed to a certain point. Where we are in our development is the limit of our knowledge. But we can develop further and higher with the necessary seriousness and inner clarity. Our senses are not complete from the beginning either; they are the products of long periods of development. The eye, this marvelously complicated organ, has been conjured out of the most primitive beginning, similar to the ear, which may have originally been nothing more than a simple static apparatus.

Similarly, abilities can still develop in the human soul that can then reveal to us what is still hidden today under impenetrable veils. This spiritual vision may be just as great an experience for a person as physical vision is for a blind person. For the blind man there is only a world of touch and sounds around him. The world of light and colors do exist in themselves, but he does not perceive any of them, so for him they are nothing. It is the same with the spiritual organs of perception. Those who lack the ability to perceive in this higher way perceive nothing of these higher worlds. However, this does not mean that there can be no development and rebirth of the soul, that one can go beyond the limits of the ordinary mind and see new worlds around oneself. In this sense, spiritual science seeks to solve the questions of existence and the riddles of the world.

For some, of course, what spiritual science has to say seems ridiculous because there is absolutely no convincing evidence for them, the undeveloped. But for those who work with these things, the matter is different. It is, moreover, a well-known fact that many things that have subsequently moved people deeply were ridiculed and scorned when they first appeared.

From this point of view, let us now discuss the great mystery of existence, which is about the nature of man, during life and after death, which thus asks about the fate of the soul.

For spiritual science, the study of the human being is much more difficult than it is for material science to study the human being, whom it merely knows. It sees the whole of man's being in his mere physical body. For spiritual science, on the other hand, this corporeality of man is only part of his entire being. The physical body is the part of man that can be perceived by our senses. It is constructed from the seemingly lifeless material of the nature around us. However, spiritual science knows other higher elements of human nature in addition to this physical body.

From the mid-nineteenth century until the last third of the twentieth century, anyone who dared to talk about such things was considered a fool. Today, however, opinions and views on this subject have changed somewhat. At the beginning of the nineteenth and at the end of the eighteenth century, people still spoke of a life force, which was understood to be something quite different from something that exists according to purely mechanical laws.

In the purely materialistic theory, however, it was thought that life meant merely a suitable interaction of physical forces.

Today, there are again some researchers who, on the basis of facts, have come to the conclusion that there is more to human life than just physical matter and forces. In earlier centuries and millennia, such things were researched by the secret sciences. There is a significant amount of literature about these secret researches, where one can find more detailed information.

The second link of the human being is called the life or etheric body. This is not to be understood as something like a structure consisting of that hypothetical physical ether, but the correct view of it can be gained through the following consideration: a crystal can exist in itself through its physical and chemical forces; for a living being, however, these alone are no longer sufficient. As soon as life has left it, the individual parts of the physical body disintegrate because they are composed of an impossible mixture. What now holds them together is precisely the life body. This is the vehicle of growth and reproduction.

The third link is the astral body, the carrier of desire and suffering, of joy and pain, of passion and instinct. It encompasses the lower soul life of the human being, as well as the lower imaginative life of everyday life.

The fourth aspect of the human being is the I, which distinguishes humans from all other earthly creatures. The etheric body is shared with plants and animals, the astral body only with the animal world. The fourth aspect, on the other hand, is, as I said, not shared with any other earthly creature. More deeply-oriented natures have always felt this I as something very special. “I” is now a very strange name, which one could not say like any other name of an object, but everyone can only say “I” to themselves. This name can never reach our ears from the outside if it is to be a designation of ourselves.

All deeper religions, and these are those based on spiritual science, know that when the soul utters that name “I”, then, as it were, God speaks in it. That is why this name was already called the unpronounceable name of God in Hebrew antiquity, which can only sound in the innermost soul. Jean Paul recounts in his biography that sublime moment of his own birth of the ego; at that moment he looked into the holy of holies of his being.

Every occult school since the most ancient times has held that man consists of at least these four elements, which work and weave together. From this point of view, the threads will also reveal themselves to us, through which we can come closer to solving the mystery of human existence.

Only the cultivated and highly developed human being can become aware of these four elements. The “savage” and the average European differ only in that the former unconditionally follows his instincts and passions, while the latter knows that they must not be followed. The I has begun to purify the astral body in the latter. Here, therefore, the astral body is divided into a part influenced by the I and one that is given over to desires.

But the I works not only on the astral body, but also on the etheric or life body. All earthly impressions that pass by quickly are changes in the etheric body for spiritual research. He who has brought about profound and lasting changes in his etheric body, for example, has improved his memory, has achieved a great deal. The greatest impulses for working in the etheric body are artistic and religious perceptions, for they most essentially ennoble the etheric body. On an even higher level, there is even a transformation of the physical body.

The differences between these individual stages only become really clear when we consider sleep and death. The former can be described as the younger brother of the latter.

Notion of the nature of sleep: During sleep, changes occur in the human being. When asleep, only the physical body and the etheric body of the sleeper lie in bed; however, the astral body and the ego are loosened. Instincts, desires and passions, feelings and sensations sink down into unconscious darkness during sleep. All qualities that are carried by the etheric body are active or at least present in a sleeping person. How can we understand the nature of the dying person and the dead? The difference between sleep and death lies in the fact that in sleep the I and the astral body are lifted out of the physical body, while in death the etheric body also separates from the physical body, leaving the latter behind as a dead corpse, which chemically represents an impossible mixture.

However, it does happen that shortly after death, the etheric and physical bodies remain together. In such moments, the whole of life between birth and death stands before consciousness like a great image.

Some people are able to describe such moments in their lives, especially if they have once been in great danger. Here, in a brief moment, what applies to all people after death occurs. Only through the physical body is the narrowness of consciousness formed. The etheric body is the carrier of memory, which is precisely what is restricted and limited in the physical body. In that moment, however, memory expands wonderfully.

The etheric body then detaches itself from the physical body as a second corpse gradually dies, only to completely dissolve in its sphere after some time. But the essence of his life remains in the human being. This essence lives and works in him and consists of the memory tableau of life. He takes this with him on his journey after life. Then the moment also arrives when those parts of the astral body dissolve that have not been processed by the ego.

Now comes a fact that can be proved just as logically as any biological law, but which few people think about properly and thoroughly, namely that the human, immortal individuality, consisting of the ego and the life essence, finds a new opportunity to enter this earthly life. The spiritual research of all times and also today's theosophy teach reincarnation.

The essence that lives in a person today has often been on earth before and will return again and again, although not always in the same external form.

Every person has the opportunity and the strength to develop through the work of their own self. This results in a refinement of the etheric body and an increase in the life essence as abilities and innate qualities. The more often a person has gone through such a life and the better they have applied such a life, the more noble their powers and aspirations will become.

Spiritual science leads man beyond spiritual superstition, while all materialistic science tends to lead to superstition because it strives to explain the imperfect from the imperfect. More and more we should strive to take as much as possible of the imperishable with us into the superphysical realm.

The ego core goes through many lives of man and rises ever higher to God. Originally, the soul also comes from divinity. Comparison with the bee that returns to the beehive laden with honey: [The old Greek wisdom says in reference to this, the human soul resembles a bee that flies out to collect honey. It flies out of the bosom of the deity and gathers the honey of experience in life, which it then carries back to the deity.] Thus, the causes of our current existence lie in previous states of existence. Ultimately, there is no suffering that is not karmically balanced before the end of the last life.

From such points of view, strength and consolation for life arise! Thus one can endure pain because one has the consciousness that a balance will take place sooner or later. One's deeds are no longer fruitless, but they all have their importance and meaning.

Karma is the name given to activities that have been transformed into fixed qualities. This law prevails throughout nature.

From such perspectives, the riddles of existence are revealed. The solutions are also answers for the mind. This is how we feel the great truths, which lead us from the transitory to the immortal, to the eternal!

[What we are dealing with today has been called the question of all questions. What could touch man more deeply, if the question is only framed broadly enough – touch him more deeply, from a certain point of view – than reflecting on his origin, on his descent, because] everyone probably has an inkling that this question includes much of what alone can enlighten man about his true nature, about his destiny and about the nature of his life in general.

Now, however, from the point of view from which we are to speak to you today about human descent, it is difficult to make ourselves understood even to our contemporaries, if they are not already somehow prepared for it through spiritual science, because compared to what is being put forward from many sides today about the descent or origin of man, what we have to say in this our meditation will seem as if it were spoken in a completely, completely different language; and given the great interest that is shown in this question today, and given the public suggestion — we may perhaps call it that — which is not true science, but many of the catchwords that have been taken from this science and which today dominate many minds, with all this, much of what is presented today will perhaps seem to some even more than what was already said in the last three lectures [of this series] much more like a mere reverie, like a fantasy. When two such fundamentally different things confront each other as what a world view that is more materialistically colored — the word does not need to be pressed — has to say about the origin of man and what spiritual science, as we are considering it here, has to present, when two such different things confront each other, then, then, above all, one must first of all bring one thing to mind. Anyone who has familiarized themselves with the concepts and ideas that dominate our popular literature when the origin of man is discussed and it is claimed that this origin of man is spoken of in the way it must be according to scientific facts; [if you are confronted with this] when you have read your way into popular [or, for that matter, more or less scientific literature, one must still bear in mind that the concepts and ideas that someone adopts are not always based entirely on real contemplation, on real observation, but on authority, which is adopted in a, one might say, mysterious, mystical way – and this word is used in the worst sense – [by what is once popular], by what once has prestige.

And it must be realized that it is extremely difficult for those who have become accustomed to thinking in the direction that confronts them to bring the ideas they have once accepted into any kind of acceptable relationship with ideas of a different nature [that are put forward, for example, from the perspective of spiritual science]. Therefore, anyone who speaks about this question from the point of view of spiritual science today has no illusions about the fact that he could easily be understood by all those who have surrendered their habitual ways of thinking, by what is commonly accepted and seemingly based on the solid facts of science. That would certainly be an illusion. Nevertheless, from this spiritual-scientific point of view, what is to be said must be said, especially today, for little by little these ideas will find their way into the minds of all those who can free themselves from the [thought habits] just mentioned. This should be stated in advance so that it is not believed that the humanities scholar only indulges in such illusions, that he can conquer those who live in strict scientific ideas in flight, or that it cannot happen, [that one confronts such ideas], and say from their point of view, that what he has presented is pure nonsense, [pure folly]. As a rule, he is able to present the arguments put forward by the opponents of the former very easily himself. The deception then mostly lies with those who approach it from a spiritual scientific point of view and believe that its arguments could contain anything new for him.

Thus, we may well consider this subject [from the standpoint of spiritual science] without prejudice, given this assumption. Monistic thinking takes the easy way out by posing the question in materialistic terms, using a curious logic... Our natural science, which has been equipped with such admirable progress in the course of the 19th century – and no one but the humanities scholar can marvel at this progress in natural science – our natural science has, among many other things, also broadened the human view of the sum of living beings that live around us today and that lived on this earth in earlier epochs of the earth's development. We find their remains more or less preserved in the layers of our earth, where we once found creatures that were little like us. And a kind of religion, a kind of belief, that has been built on this scientific fact, has concluded from the contemplation, from the appropriate contemplation of what the world shows around us today, if we look at the layers of the earth to search for pre-worldly beings. This confession has turned it into a kind of theory of evolution that contains an extraordinary amount of interesting, important and also correct information.

But we can characterize the logical error that this theory of evolution makes with a few words – and we must characterize it [in this way] – and it is precisely when we start from this point that we will gather the material for thought in order to present that [being] to our minds, which can be said from the point of view of spiritual science. Science shows us [today] the perfect being alongside imperfect life. If we examine the layers of our earth, science shows us a series of [apparently] imperfect living creatures [to seemingly perfect beings], so that we can say: It is obvious to the human eye that one living creature is imperfect and the other is perfect.

Now, due to circumstances and facts [that we do not want to explain here], a remarkable logical conclusion has been drawn from this.

Let us consider this conclusion in its simplest, logical, sober form: the perfect has arisen from the imperfect. By making a comparison, we can make this conclusion clear to ourselves and then ask ourselves whether it is possible. Let us assume that we see two people next to each other, one with a genius for hard work, who has developed great diligence in life and has achieved something respectable. If we take another person next to him, we see a different person who has few abilities, who was also lazy and lethargic and has achieved nothing of note. Now we hear that these two are related. How they are related is something we should think about first, because that is the question in relation to the so-called developmental problem. When we look at the beings around us, we see that humans, with their various organs, are similar to lower forms of life, so-called imperfect ones. We see that humans have a slightly different structure, but basically the same bones as lower creatures. We could cite numerous other reasons that could lead us to the conclusion that we must assume a relationship. But what this relationship is like has not been established by facts, but inferred. No one should entertain the belief that the origin of the higher from the lower has been established; it has been inferred.

So if we know that they [the two people standing opposite each other] are related, [if we] can determine that from something, can we then conclude that [the one who has the genius and who was hardworking and achieved something decent comes] from [the other who was lazy and careless and did not improve]? Anyone who reflects a little will be able to realize how unnatural such a conclusion would be, and how easily he could be set right in his thinking if it were shown to him that the one as well as the other person descended from the same parents, that the one has only developed upward to his industriousness, but the other has declined, has developed downward. It is extremely trivial, [what I see], and it could seem as if an admirable theory that prevails in the world today should be refuted [by an /illegible/ triviality].

Unfortunately, however, [if we look closely] this logical blunder is [made] because it is known that the higher organism is related, [and it is] concluded that the higher one descends from the lower one – [by thinking that one could say that the more highly developed human descends from the lower, lazy human].

Now let us expand this little reflection to include, say, different peoples living side by side, a lower-developed people and a higher-developed people. Today, we have become accustomed to thinking that a higher-developed people with significant spiritual education [and cultural achievements] has developed from a state in which a lower-developed people finds itself today. Exactly the same conclusion as one would draw if one were to place these two people next to each other today. It is possible that one could be corrected if one were to research the facts, just as spiritual science is able to show that it is not the case that the spiritually higher educated people descend from the lower, but that] on the contrary, there is a common descent [of the two], that one that is spiritually more highly developed has developed in one direction and the other in the direction of decline. So that when we examine the ancestry, we are led up to a common primal people, not to the one that lives next to the other today, but to a common one. Since both live side by side, [they descend equally from the primal people]. Only one has developed upwards, the other downwards [in a certain respect].

Let us look at this in a little more detail, [so that our minds can form certain concrete ideas in the process]. You all know that when the European immigrants first moved to the American continent, they encountered an indigenous people [there], a people who are believed [in natural historical thinking] to represent earlier stages of the present peoples. From a European point of view, they were certainly at a low level of civilization back then, but if you take such an absolute point of view, you can go very wrong in your judgment. Let's imagine a scene to illustrate this. The Europeans have not always managed things so well. They have not always chosen the best means to exterminate the free man. One of the last chiefs [of the free people] who came from the areas from which [the Native Americans] were expelled in North America [was one of the last] to face a European conqueror, a leader of a European culture. The inhabitants of America had been deprived of their lands, including the tribe to which that Indian chief belonged. [The scene took place not so long ago.] The people had been promised land for what was taken from them, and it had not been kept.

The leader of the “redskins” stood opposite the leader of the Europeans. We have preserved a speech that the leader of the Native Americans addressed to the Europeans who had defeated his tribe and had not given them any land. I cannot even give you a literal translation of this speech, only the gist of it, what it contains. This is roughly what the chief said to the European: “Yes, you Europeans, you promised us other land for the land whose soil is covered by the corpses of our free brothers, you did not give us other land. That is because the pale man believes in different things than the free man. The pale man has strange magic tools, where little magic creatures are on them, he looks into them and sees what is right for him, he sees what is true and what is false. - The chief once saw the books and thought the letters were such magic creatures, [magic spirits that cause the Europeans to take such measures]. The free man does not believe in such spirits; the free man does not read what is written in such books of spells; the free man goes out and hears how the water rushes and how the trees rustle in the forest and he understands that. Because the Great Spirit speaks to him through the rushing of the water and the rustling of the trees. He always speaks the truth, and because you do not know the Great Spirit, who speaks the truth in the rushing of the water and the rustling of the trees, that is why you behave in this way. The pale man can never understand the free man, otherwise he would not trample with his weapons on the earth, which covers the bones of our brothers and which will one day take revenge on the pale ones!

What interests us about this strange speech by the free man, however, is the reference to the Great Spirit, whom he suspected everywhere. In the rustling of the trees, [in the trickling of the springs], even in thunder and lightning, [in all natural phenomena] the [divine] great spirit spoke to him. What is remarkable about this “savage” population is [this monotheistic religion], this remoteness from all superstition in their fundamental religious belief, which shines through the many superstitions that were present. You really don't need to go very far with your logic before you can see that those who were conquered by the Europeans, from whom the Europeans do not descend, but both [the European and the American population] descend from a common people, who must have had a wonderful natural religion. That will be a hypothesis if one stands on the standpoint of the sense-physical facts; that is a certainty if one [researches spiritually with the methods that we will talk about in the next lectures, especially in the second-next one, which is about initiation]. The American population, which had declined in certain respects, had lost its original purity and developed in another direction [towards a lower level]; the European, from his point of view, developed in the opposite direction. This gives us a concept of development that shows us very, very different perspectives than the simple concept of development that people are so keen to present to us as the only possible one. We see how this development is not at all simple, how we must assume earlier states of existence from which today's emerged, how that which today lives as imperfect in the imperfect appears to be a branch-off that develops towards imperfection. If we could go back in time to the distant past, we would find peoples who are the ancestors of the European [population] as well as those of the conquered American Indians. The path of development went so that a straight development [direction] led to the present-day developed population. But those who did not keep up, who did not absorb what could have led to perfection, came to a decline. The others are not descended from them, but descended from a common ancestor, others have progressed. [They are not merely /uncertain reading] lagging behind on a different point of view, but] because they lagged behind, they now show a state that was never present in ancient times. Because [they were] unable to develop further, [they] regressed.

We can now extend this concept to all living things. If we extend it in this way, we go back to the mammals that are closer to humans. Any simple theory of evolution would assume that the higher mammals were the ancestors of man. Today, this notion of man's very brutal descent from apes has been somewhat dropped, but the line of thought is still based on what appears to be different. If we imagine the relationship between humans and higher apes using this concept, we will say: Today's apes may descend from that original being that existed in the distant past and to which humans have evolved, but they have remained at [an older point of view], and therefore, in their present state, [in their present form] do not represent the ancestors of mankind, but the degenerate creation [that has wanted to hold on to an old form; that has corrupted itself]. Therefore, when today's man looks at this ape, he sees it with the mind, [then] it appears to him as a caricature of his own being, not at all as an ancestor, [and anyone with such feelings experiences it] as a kind of embarrassment... [illegible] when the original characteristics of man are corrupted.

[And so, step by step, we descend from higher to much lower creatures. In the remote past, we come to ancestors of man, whom we must not seek in creatures similar to present-day humans – the further back we go, the more dissimilar they become to the creatures that exist today. They are quite differently shaped]; from those ancestors of man, as a retarded and therefore declining entity, the lower mammals and other lower creatures descend. If we go back to the simplest creatures, [those that live today, consisting of one cell, from which one would also like to derive man,] then we would have to say that, yes, these creatures are undoubtedly related to man. But in the distant past, when man had an ancestor [from whom even these simple single-celled organisms descended, man looked quite different, his ancestor was a completely different being: The simplest organisms are the ones that are furthest behind and therefore the furthest from the original form of [the human being]. This is because they branched off earliest and, since humans have perfected themselves, have undergone a decline, [taken a direction of decline, and are the ones that are furthest from the original form].

Now let us look at this original form of man himself from the point of view of spiritual science. [There we have to take a look at the essence of man, as we have already frequently done.] We cannot look at [man] from the point of view of spiritual science in the simple way that we look at the physical body in material science.

[In what material science regards as the only thing, the human body, only one limb of the human being is based – this is only briefly hinted at – which has the same forces and materials as the seemingly inanimate matter – but science sees this body only be composed of these substances and forces in such an implicit way that these substances and forces could not maintain their form, as the material maintains its form], if the human physical body were not permeated and imbued with the second part of its being, the etheric or life body. This etheric or life body is for the spiritual scientist - [as already shown here last week] - a reality, a higher reality than the physical body, for it is the shaper and creator of the physical body. This etheric body or life body, which is a constant fighter against the dissolution of the physical body, because the moment the etheric body separates from the physical body, death occurs, and the physical body becomes a corpse. This etheric or life body is shared by humans and all other living beings, plants and animals. The third [link is called the astral body in spiritual science for good reasons]. The astral body is the carrier of lust and suffering, of joy and pain, of all instincts, drives, passions, ideas and feelings, of all that lives in the human being. This astral body is the third link of the human being. It has more in common only with the animal world, no longer with the plant world. [Then we already mentioned eight days ago] the fourth link of the human being, through which man is the crown of earthly creation, that which we could say is designated in the German language by the only name that differs from all other names, the name of our ego. The ego name, when you think about it, indicates the essence of the [ego]. [But first turn to] Fichte, [who said]:

Most people would much rather consider themselves a
piece of lava in the moon than an ego.

This ego can only be called from within itself. The name 'I' can never reach my ear if it denotes my own self; that can only be designated by the name 'I' from within. This has been discovered and recognized by those who study spiritual science: here is the actual sanctuary, the innermost link of human nature, to which nothing else of earthly things has access, but where human divine essence penetrates to one. [Man's divine essence announces itself in the ego.] By letting the little word “I” sound to itself, the soul speaks to itself what [religion] refers to as the God in man. This fourth link [of the human essence] is no longer shared by man with other beings, but is for himself and is thus the crown of earthly creation. ... /Illegible words]

[Thus, we initially have the human being as a tetrad before us, and anyone who speaks from a so-called monistic point of view would therefore not only want to accuse this spiritual-scientific view of dualism, which has been used to is done with it, but] then he should also reproach the dualism of the person who says that water consists of oxygen and hydrogen. If it is a mistake to look for light in its primary colors, only the one who does not think of dissecting the thing into its individual parts, or who claims of the individual that it is the comprehensive one, is a monist.]

Only he is a monist who does not think of dissecting the thing into its own members or of claiming that a single member is the whole. Then the word monism becomes a buzzword that does not take into account the facts. [But after all, people work with buzzwords today, not with facts.]

Now we can only understand the origin and descent of man if we consider the relationships between these elements of human beings in the present-day individual. We must distinguish between the two essentially different states in which we encounter man, waking and sleeping. These are two fundamentally different states. It was a remarkable fact when Du Bois-Reymond, [the naturalist], said [and it has already been pointed out in the first of these lectures] at the Leipzig Naturalists' Assembly: 'If one were to examine everything that goes on in the human physical body, all these [complicated movements and] processes, one could indeed investigate how hydrogen and oxygen and carbon and nitrogen [move in such a way, but one could examine all this], but one would never be able to explain the simplest fact of consciousness from these movements: “I feel red”, “I smell the scent of roses”. And likewise, even if someone were to see all the movements with the most wonderful instruments, he would only see movement, but not the soul processes, “I see red and feel the scent of roses”.

It is the worst materialistic superstition, and basically very interesting, that even on scientific ground it has been pointed out [although he has made significant blunders] that the fact of consciousness of the simplest sensation can never be explained from the facts of the physical body. We can understand the sleeping person, but never the waking one. Why? When a person sleeps, all these facts seem to sink into an indeterminate abyss, and because that is missing, we can understand what remains. Du Bois-Reymond, who is himself a materialist, rightly found the fact of life inexplicable.

To make this clear, let us consider the difference between the waking and the sleeping human being. In the waking body, we have the astral human being connected to the physical and etheric bodies. In the sleeping person, on the other hand, we have separated the astral body, detached it from the physical body [and from the etheric body. The difference between being awake and sleeping is that the astral body is separated from the physical and etheric bodies during sleep, but is connected to the physical and etheric bodies when we are awake.]

However, if you imagine purely in material and spatial terms that a kind of material cloud [as the astral body] emerges from the physical body, you still have a rather materialistic idea.

The human being, as he is today in his development, is just not able to perceive his physical organs [during sleep]; when the astral body reconnects with the physical body in the morning upon waking, [he can then perceive the physical surroundings through the eyes and ears]. What perceives is not your physical body, but the I with the astral body, which moves into its physical body in the morning. Physical organs are the instruments of this I equipped with a physical body. Therefore, no one would think of saying, “my brain feels a color, sees a friend,” but rather, everyone correctly says, “I see a friend,” “I perceive a color,” and so on.

When we consider the fact that today, when we are asleep, the human being, his I and his astral body are outside the physical and etheric body, then those who ask – [then we have to ask ourselves]: Where is the I [with the astral body] then? That is also somewhere in another world, in a world that belongs to the supersensible worlds. What does that mean? Where is this supersensible world? Those who oppose spiritual science imagine that spiritual science imagines this supersensible world to be in a beyond. Here it is, all around us!

And how does spiritual science imagine this supersensible world? Not any differently than [one has to imagine] colors and light for the blind. Imagine that you have a congenitally blind person below you. That which is around you, colors and light, is also around him, but he does not see it. For him, the world is what he can feel; for him, the world is [as for you, the world is the world of light and colors]. But if we could operate on this man born blind at this moment, so that he would see, out of the darkness that was around him, the lights and colors would light up, [and the world that was not there for him before. Why is it there now? We see that he has now formed it out of the physical.]

There are as many worlds in infinity as a being has organs to perceive them. [We will see in later lectures that] man, as he once had the disposition in primeval times to the eyes, which at that time could not yet see, but became seeing in the course of development, that all men have the disposition to what is called in spiritual science with Goethe, “the spiritual ears, the spiritual eyes”. Spiritual eyes and ears are present in man as a predisposition and can be developed. This is the purpose of spiritual science, that it gives people the methods to be able to enter the state that is related to the blind-born, [who can be] operated on, [to the world of colors and light, and] of course someone who knows nothing about it should not decide anything about such a world, [but] the only thing that can be said is that this is there, what can be perceived. And it is not only people of the future who can perceive these higher worlds that are around us, but these methods can be applied to people of the present.

People of the present know as a fact, as a primal form, that one can relate to the [higher] worlds as the blind are born [to the world of colors and light]. By awakening the spiritual ears and eyes, new worlds can arise that are around us. In this world and in no other is the human ego and the astral body when they are separated at night from the physical and etheric bodies. As long as a person's spiritual ears and eyes are not awakened, he cannot see [in this spiritual world], so consciousness fades away. But then, when spiritual eyes and ears are awakened, he can see.

But never can [may] perception decide on existence. [Otherwise a blind man could say to a seeing man who says he sees color and light: You are a fool, I see nothing at all]. Existence does not coincide with truth.

Now we ask ourselves the further question: What does this astral body do during the night and what is its business? [Is it unemployed?] This astral body is indeed busy during the night. When you work from morning till evening or let impressions of the outside world affect you through your senses, then something is going on [continually within you], and that is the fatigue, the wearing down of the forces of the physical body. Why is a healthy sleep so healthy? Because the astral body works [during the night on the removal of fatigue, of worn-out substances], on the restoration of the worn-out forces. What the astral body has done, you feel [in the morning as] a refreshment [even if you do not know how it works].

So this astral body works throughout the night, but how is it able to work in the physical body? It is able to do so because it is now not within but outside the physical body. An astral human body that is outside the physical body can work on that body. The one that is in the body has to make use of the organs of the physical body [to perceive the physical environment] and cannot restore [the worn physical body] from within it. Therefore, for all beings that have their astral body within them during wakefulness, it is necessary that the waking state alternates with the sleeping state.

When death occurs, what happens then? What does not happen during our entire life. Then not only the astral separates from the physical, but also the etheric body from the physical. [When you have the sleeping body in front of you, the physical and etheric bodies are in perfect connection in bed, the astral body is lifted out.] If you have the corpse in front of you, then the etheric body has been lifted out. Therefore, the physical and chemical substances now follow their own laws, [the body can no longer hold together] - and here we have set out the fact of death and the fact of sleeping and waking. Only when we know these are we able to understand the primitive conditions of man, then we can take a look at the origin of man.

Let us now take up our concept again. [I cannot talk about all the details today, but only give a sketch of human origin]. Let us go back to a distant past. We find a human ancestor.

But what did he look like? Quite different from today's man. Everything, absolutely everything in humanity has developed, including the conditions of sleeping and waking. They have only become what they are today, were quite different in times gone by. Spiritual science indicates that the distribution of sleep and waking as it is today only occurred relatively late [in the development of the earth]; the rule of sleep was quite different in the distant past. Man slept much longer, [was in an unconscious state, that is,] his astral body was much longer outside the physical body than it is today. And because it had the opportunity to be out longer and the waking state was shorter, this astral body had little to do with mending [the physical body]. The fatigue was not so great.

Today the night state is filled with mending [the physical body]. We only see something in our dreams, like fragments from the unconscious state. In ancient times of the distant past, not all of the work of the [astral body] had to be used to repair the physical body. Therefore, [even if it was dull and dim], this [astral] body [with the ego] was clairvoyant to a certain extent. In a way, this astral body, which was not so intimately connected to the physical and etheric bodies, could see into its surroundings. It saw what was around it in the spiritual world. However, what was it like, [looking into the world here? What is left behind?] There is dreaming. But dreaming is something that is only a very weak, [corrupted] echo of an [ancient], dim clairvoyance of all humanity, just as we have certain organs in us that used to have their function, [for example, certain] muscles near the ear. [Those beings in the animal kingdom that have remained at this level still have these muscles to move their ears.] Such organs, [which today have no function but which had a function in earlier stages of development], are called atavisms. One such atavism is dreaming. In the distant past, in the distant past of humanity, it was not what it is today, but something that brought man into real contact with his surroundings. As strange as it may seem to materialistic thinkers, I would like to give you an [unreadable] and describe a little [how it was] back then. In those ancient times, when man was in that half-asleep state, he could not perceive man in the way that he [could perceive the external natures, but he perceived] what lived in the soul of [other] people. When he – [the other] – was awake and thinking bad thoughts, then he [perceived this evil feeling, it] rose [like a kind of luminous body] for the consciousness at that time as a process of perception, a color image for the state of mind of the other.

In this way, people perceived the spiritual in their environment. [Of course, for materialistic thinkers this is something quite foolish. But the reasons that can be given against it are well known to the spiritual researchers themselves. So: Man was predisposed to be able to perceive in dreams. But it does not matter what one dreams; if a dream reflects reality, then it is real perception. [But if it is perceived in a dream, it is not yet bad. ... We have to imagine these ancient dreams as a much more vital state, showing a spiritual world around man that also exists today, but which he can no longer see because he has lost the ancient clairvoyance, but will learn to see again in the future.

Now we have described this person from the distant past. His astral body was essentially [more powerful], more substantial, more alive than it is now. Man has acquired this [external sensory] perception through his prolonged dwelling in the physical body. [But there is an original state of man in which the astral body was more outside the physical and etheric bodies than it is today.]

Let us realize what the astral body can still do in the physical body under certain circumstances, even today. It cannot do much today, but it can do something. When you feel a sense of shame in your soul and you blush, the blushing is a purely physical process, and what is it the result of? Of a process in the astral body.

The impression that caused the feeling of shame – [a reality of the imagination, an emotional reality] – has caused a feeling in the astral body [and] this feeling [has driven the blood to the surface, causing the blush of shame to appear here]. You can see how the blood could be set in motion by processes in the astral body through one process or another. [Today, there is very little that the astral body can do, but in the past it had great power.] In ancient times, the relationship between the astral body and the physical body was quite different. Not only could the astral body control the physical body in the minor way in which it [illegible] encountered the blood, but it had the ability to transform this physical body itself in terms of its form. At that time, when the astral body was still outside, [he had] not only the task of [removing the physical substances of] fatigue, but [illegible] that clairvoyant ability could [re-form the physical body].

Today [man] has a different forehead. [Certain animals still have that forehead formation and [illegible] formation corrupted. Man] has pushed it forward through forces that were in this astral body. [We can visualize what pushed this human forehead forward.] It was only when man learned to walk upright and move upright that he learned to imagine and feel the starry sky, that which is above, in a certain way. The animal, with its eyes directed downwards or straight ahead, does not have these impressions. When [humans] began to measure the space between the stars, namely at the time when humans had clairvoyant vision, [what was absorbed there] pushed the forehead forward, causing the brain to develop into the kind of convolutions that humans have today in terms of their abilities. This astral body is the creator of our forebrain and helped create [the anterior brain] [in adaptation to the external world]. Thus we can literally see how the astral body helped create the physical body.

Just as the astral body today transforms only a pale face into a red face [when shame is driven into the face], so in ancient times it shaped [the brain] out of this [primordial form] [into its present form]. Those beings in our line of ancestors who acquired this ability ascend to humans. Those who did not acquire this ability do not ascend to humanity, but condense. [Thus] an earlier stage of development ossified, corrupted, [and shows itself to us in a corrupted state]. Man must never be derived from today's ape, which has never been able to let these powers of the astral body take effect on it. But now we ask, if we go back even further, then we come to an even looser connection [to the physical and ether body]. There is less and less of it [the physical and etheric body], therefore the astral body [in the etheric body] is more and more powerful [and more and more powerful] and more and more able to transform the physical body. [At that time, man was gelatinous, like the animal, which is even more gelatinous today.] When man was in a soft state, the astral body could work on him in a powerful way.

[And] so we can go further and further back, to the state where the entire astral body was outside [the physical body], [where the physical body] related to the ether body as [ the body of the snail to the physical house [of the snail] relates, where the astral body /illegible] it, as it were, switches and reworks it, like the snail on the house - the snail does not live in the fabric of the house. [So it belongs to the physical and etheric bodies, but it does not yet live in them; it works on them from the outside; and we find] states, if we go back even further, [where even] the etheric body is not yet in this intimate connection with this physical body, the etheric body is still outside the physical body, and here we come to realize that the members of human nature, [which today in the waking human being are inwardly linked together], in ancient times have joined together. They certainly have a common origin, but despite the fact that they originate from the unified primal being and the unity they form in man is a remarkable one, [they are multi-faceted]. And if we ascribe to the astral body the ability to transform the physical body, what qualities can we ascribe to the [originally] free etheric body? ... /illegible]

[The further we go back in this respect to the original properties of this body, the better we get to know the mysterious workings in development]; if we can ascribe to the astral body the [shaping and reshaping, the] transformation [and reworking of the physical body], then we must ascribe to the ether body the material creation of the physical body. What is our physical body around us today, how did it come into being? We can visualize this with an image.

[The] humanities scholar [is not able to present everything with [illegible] through images. Today, what is tangible can be presented to everyone with the help of an image, which is something that arouses more associations from a physical-materialistic point of view.

By means of comparison, we can realize how the physical body of man came into being. Today, people believe so easily that what they know as physical contains the origin of the living, but this is again [such a] habit of thought, in truth it is not so. If you [once] deal with the prejudices that today [are said to come from science but do not come from it] ... /gap] If you examine how things are, [and we then only learn the method of how to examine], then you can make clear to yourself by the following comparison how the physical body comes into being.

Take coal, it is a mineral substance today. But long ago it was plants. What is now coal was once present as [graphite-containing] plants [in mighty forests]; the organic has transformed into the inorganic, the plant has become stone, the living has become physical. If you are able to do spiritual scientific research, you can see how all stones were originally living beings. We can investigate and prove that stones, rock crystal, were plants in primeval times, just like stone coal. Just as the mineral part of us originally came to life, so too was the human physical body once separated from the etheric body. As you see today] the many coral animals that build the coral reef, the physical, [you see how they grow out of it], see how the living creatures work this physical reef out of their own body. So in a time of man [ancestor] only this etheric body was present, [the astral body, and the] physical body is out of the etheric body [through a process] like ice from the water; the etheric body is a condensation, in condensed, other form, and there we come back to the original state of humanity.

Where only the etheric body existed, there was no physical human being at all. How did the physical human being begin? There was the astral and the etheric human being, who preceded the [physical] human being. The first physical human being was a small physical inclusion, like when chalk balls split off from [an animal, you see the animal and then a small chalk ball], or [you have] a container of water here: first [a small grain of ice forms], then it increases in size [little by little].

So man's entire physical nature was not there at all. It formed in the first place [as a small, tiny thing] within the spiritual, etheric [and astral], and] what now detached itself from the etheric and astral and back, was doomed, it began to develop in a descending direction, [and became the lowest living creatures]. But what was seized by the forces of the etheric and astral bodies developed higher. [Something detached itself from the animal], step by step, until [the stage was reached where] today's man was present; he left beings everywhere in his wake, as a result of the [developmental] steps he has taken. The simplest being that one sees today, which is said to be the progenitor [of humanity], is only a side branch [of human development].

But man [as a spiritual being], as an astral being, precedes all living beings. He is the firstborn as a spiritual being. [The other beings, the imperfect beings, descend] from him [as a spiritual being], who [from the very beginning] has all the potential for the highest perfection [within himself]. So man was there as a spiritual being before he was there as a physical [being]. [So where do we come from? From the world that man does not see]; man does not see the world in which the astral, etheric bodies are at home. In there is the world from which man really comes. Therefore, what is the highest link in man originally comes from him in a mysterious way, [the astral body, the etheric body and] as the last link, the physical body. Man descends from the Divine-Spiritual, [from the spiritual man descends. Only] then do we consider the appearance and descent of man in the right light, when [we] truly [elevate ourselves to spiritual-scientific contemplation. These spiritual-scientific insights can be explained in detail in the course of winter. What now appears as a program will become clear in its details. That will become clear... The physical is born out of the spiritual. The spiritual is something that permeates everything. This has always been felt above all by those who, through their good disposition and insight, had no materialistic mind and no materialistic habits of thought. From the laws that permeate and resound through the whole world as spiritual, from such laws, man appears to spiritual researchers as originating. Thus spiritual research is based on no other point of view than Goethe's, which we have recognized as a genuine spiritual researcher and which he has expressed in the most diverse forms, including in that wonderful series of poems entitled “God and the World” [is entitled], in which there is a beautiful poem, ‘Orphic Primal Words’, of which today we are particularly interested in the first stanza, because it shows us how Goethe was aware of the facts we have been talking about today. He wants to show us how that which is spiritual in man, which comes from higher laws [than from physical laws, which are explained by external sensory facts], cannot be fragmented by the powers of the temporal, cannot be fragmented by the forces of the sensual. [This is what he wants to express when he] connects an ancient, sacred idea to [his own dismemberment]: I and spiritual people are not bound to the physical laws of the body, which they themselves have produced, built, transformed, they are eternal and unchanging in their essence, in that they transform and remodel that which they themselves [as the ego and astral body] have produced.

As on the day when you were given to the world
the sun stood in greeting of the planets
You are as ever present and eternal
[according to the law by which you came into being].
You must be so, you cannot escape it,
So said the Sibyls and the seers of old.
And no power and no time dismember
The molded form that lives and develops.